> > So, it's all about Judy.
> >
raunchydog:
> Hey, Willytex, is that your girlfriend?
>
Nope, I'm married, - thanks for the interest -
but Judy is about my age.
So what's taking Judy so long to show us the lie
in this post? Are you trying to canvass for the
award for unintentded irony? Go fi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey wrote:
> I'll do yas one better. I'll bet ya 2 shiny SBA dollars that you
> can't find a post of Judy's where she is not being a lying,
> hypocritical, personality disordered, nasty old coot that was
> not made on a day ending in y.
Jeez, I must hav
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, zarzari_786 > >
> >
> > Absolutely. To say that she is neutral about people and only addresses
> > issues is absolute hypocrisy, all the LABELS (Emily take note) like 'master
> > of uni
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog"
wrote:
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" steve.sundur@
wrote:
> > >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog"
> > wrote:
> > If you want to keep digging yourself a hole on this one, you can
take
> > it up with
ot;The problem with labels is that they lead to stereotypes and stereotypes
> lead to generalizations and generalizations lead to assumptions and
> assumptions lead back to stereotypes." - Ellen Degeneres
>
>
>
> From: zarzari_786
> To: Fa
to stereotypes." - Ellen Degeneres
From: zarzari_786
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, January 6, 2012 2:31 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Rule? Was (Happy new year to everyone !!! (And
more love bombing..)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.c
Hey, Willytex, is that your girlfriend?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "richardatrwilliamsdotus"
wrote:
>
> zarzari_786:
> > To say that she is neutral about people and
> > only addresses issues is absolute hypocrisy,
> > all the LABELS (Emily take note) like 'master
> > of unintended iro
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, zarzari_786 wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > O.K. then. Sh
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, zarzari_786 wrote:
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> > >
> > > O.K. then. Show us one post where Judy has ever pointed
> > > out an unintended irony, a lie or
zarzari_786:
> To say that she is neutral about people and
> only addresses issues is absolute hypocrisy,
> all the LABELS (Emily take note) like 'master
> of unintended irony', or calling Vaj a
> notorious liar are from her...
>
So, it's all about Judy.
Maybe we should award 'zarari' a little osc
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" wrote:
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog"
> wrote:
> If you want to keep digging yourself a hole on this one, you can take
> it up with Judy.
> >
> Perhaps if I could phrase a question in such a way that she would answ
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog"
wrote:
If you want to keep digging yourself a hole on this one, you can take
it up with Judy.
>
Perhaps if I could phrase a question in such a way that she would answer
it, I would. That in inself appears to be a problem. But also proves
my p
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, zarzari_786 > >
>
> Absolutely. To say that she is neutral about people and only addresses issues
> is absolute hypocrisy, all the LABELS (Emily take note) like 'master of
> unintended irony',
Says zarzari who was awarded "master of the unintended iron
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> >
> > O.K. then. Show us one post where Judy has ever pointed
> > out an unintended irony, a lie or a wiggle from owning
> > up to an error because and only because the perso
"three of Judy's consistent victims...". Victims?! Would that be one, your
inadvertent irony, two, your narcissistic imagination, and three, your
distorted thinking, or did you have other "victims" in mind?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogr
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > O.K. then. Show us one po
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> > >
> > > O.K. then. Show us one post where Judy has ever pointed
> > > out an unintended irony, a lie or a w
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> >
> > O.K. then. Show us one post where Judy has ever pointed
> > out an unintended irony, a lie or a wiggle from owning
> > up to an error because and only because the pers
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
>
> O.K. then. Show us one post where Judy has ever pointed
> out an unintended irony, a lie or a wiggle from owning
> up to an error because and only because the person she
> confronted is a TM critic. Bet you a buck you can't and
> I'
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, zarzari_786 wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> > > >
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog"
> wrote:
> > O.K. then. Show us one post where Judy has ever pointed out an
> unintended irony, a lie or a wiggle from owning up to an error because
> and only because the per
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, zarzari_786 wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> > >
> > > No matter how often she calls out Barry for being the master of
> > > unintended i
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog"
wrote:
> O.K. then. Show us one post where Judy has ever pointed out an
unintended irony, a lie or a wiggle from owning up to an error because
and only because the person she confronted is a TM critic. Bet you a
buck you can't and I'll bet you a
> > I don't know which forum you are referring to,
> > but it must be different from the one than the
> > one I am reading. Maybe its time to put off your
> > glasses, or simply are honest about reality.
> >
raunchydog:
> O.K. then. Show us one post where Judy has ever
> pointed out an unint
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, zarzari_786 wrote:
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> >
> > No matter how often she calls out Barry for being the master of unintended
> > irony, Vaj for lying or has long winded arguments with Curtis, who does his
> > best
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
>
> No matter how often she calls out Barry for being the master of unintended
> irony, Vaj for lying or has long winded arguments with Curtis, who does his
> best to wriggle out of owning up to whatever she has nailed him on, they
> ca
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, zarzari_786 wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "futur.musik" wrote:
> > >
> > > I never said, "Barry should wear a condom before he has
> > > anal sex with Curtis", or "Barry ou
From: raunchydog
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2012 1:26 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Rule? Was (Happy new year to everyone !!! (And
more love bombing..)
Hi Em,
Barry is the only person with an enemy's list, which he imagines are people who
have an axe to gr
and get on with the daily
> appointments. Â I haven't counted my posts of late, but am being quite
> prolific again and don't want to post out on a Friday. Â Â
>
>
> ____________
> From: zarzari_786
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, zarzari_786 wrote:
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "futur.musik" wrote:
> >
> > I never said, "Barry should wear a condom before he has anal sex with
> > Curtis", or "Barry oughta brush his teeth before sucking off Curtis", or
> > "It would
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, zarzari_786 wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "futur.musik" wrote:
> >
> > I never said, "Barry should wear a condom before he has
> > anal sex with Curtis", or "Barry oughta brush his teeth
> > before sucking off Curtis", or "It would be tou
fe@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2012 11:22 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Rule? Was (Happy new year to everyone !!!
> (And more love bombing..)
>
>
> Â
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, zarzari_786 wrote:
> >
>
> > E
AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Rule? Was (Happy new year to everyone !!! (And
more love bombing..)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, zarzari_786 wrote:
>
> Emily, I very much agree with Barry on his analysis, it is spot on. There is
> a lot in the context, you don
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "futur.musik" wrote:
>
> I never said, "Barry should wear a condom before he has anal sex with
> Curtis", or "Barry oughta brush his teeth before sucking off Curtis", or "It
> would be tough to give Barry a blow job, not cuz his penis is so small, but
> b
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, zarzari_786 wrote:
>
> Emily, I very much agree with Barry on his analysis, it is spot on. There is
> a lot in the context, you don't understand, you *cannot* understand, no blame
> to you for that. The example Barry gave, I found was hilarious, and there
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn wrote:
> >
> > If this forum wants to set a new rule...perhaps that
> > should be "Using words or pictures to indicate a direct
> > sexual act between two forum members without their s
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn wrote:
>
>
> "I'm trying to do you a favor and NOT treat you as
> being as naive as you're coming across. I'm trying
> to suggest that you are being baffled by bullshit
> and being taken in by long-term bullshitters, andÂ
> that you don't realize
thing different about this.
From: zarzari_786
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2012 10:39 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Rule? Was (Happy new year to everyone !!! (And
more love bombing..)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> OR
> they are other posters who have dared to agree with
> people they designated as the "troika" (Vaj, Curtis,
> and myself) on the Enemies List. Or who even admitted
> to liking their posts.
Bingo
> Just wait until YOU side with on
_
From: turquoiseb
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2012 10:09 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Rule? Was (Happy new year to everyone !!! (And
more love bombing..)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn wrote:
>
>
> "I'm tryi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn wrote:
>
>
> "I'm trying to do you a favor and NOT treat you as
> being as naive as you're coming across. I'm trying
> to suggest that you are being baffled by bullshit
> and being taken in by long-term bullshitters, and
> that you don't realize i
hursday, January 5, 2012 9:33 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: New Rule? Was (Happy new year to everyone !!! (And
more love bombing..)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn wrote:
>
> If this forum wants to set a new rule...perhaps that
> should be "Using words or p
Ha-Ha! you are such a little victim aren't you Barry? Let's remind Em that you
have called Raunchy and Judy "dumb cunts" and you said recently you would
rather urinate on me than respond to my posts. Or is that disgusting behavior
justified because "someone else did it too!". I'd bet money you w
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn wrote:
>
> If this forum wants to set a new rule...perhaps that
> should be "Using words or pictures to indicate a direct
> sexual act between two forum members without their stated
> consent is not allowed and will result in dismissal for
> a w
If this forum wants to set a new rule...perhaps that should be "Using words or
pictures to indicate a direct sexual act between two forum members without
their stated consent is not allowed and will result in dismissal for a week's
time."
From: richardatrwilli
45 matches
Mail list logo