Whatever the facts about Bill Clinton's "transgressions," he isn't running for
president. And what kind of comparison one would make with Trump depends on
whether one believes Clinton's accusers.
(As you know, Clinton was impeached for perjury and obstruction of justice,
not for his behavior
As you well know, I don't lie. Only the liars here ever say I lie--and they're
lying.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
You lie every time you defend Hillary's lies. You seem to be in denial. Just
once I'd like to see you be honest about Hillary Clinton. By not acknowledgin
The part in red below is a lie, so I'm afraid your "definition" doesn't work.
Stew, stew, stew, Stevie-poo.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
What a waste of time replying to you, but for the fun of it, I will
enlightened you.
Anyone whose internet career has been pri
Neither has Hillary. And Bill Clinton is irrelevant.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Well, she has never been charged with perjury and lost a license to practice
law or been found to be a liar by the FBI.
From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@ya
Trump: ...You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start
kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re
a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.
Bush: Whatever you want.
Trump: Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do anything.
As I
You liars who say I lie keep forgetting that nobody has ever been able to make
the charge stick, despite years of trying on the liars' part.
When you accuse someone of lying, you need to be able to document it. You
can't do that with me, because there are no examples of my having lied.
I have to laugh at Stevie-poo going the Barry route, not having any routes of
his own.
I don't think it's going to do Stevie any more good than it did Barry.
But maybe it'll convince the folks at The_Closet to let him in...
Stew, stew, stew, Stevie-poo.
---In FairfieldLife@yah
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
It's weird that you would fib about this again
Yes, it would be weird if I fibbed about this again, seeing as how I never
fibbed to begin with and am not fibbing now. What's really weird is that you
pretend I'm fibbing when you're the one wh
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
And his wife threatened and intimidated these women. Hillary was/is Bill
Clinton's *enabler*.
As I pointed out, quoting from a New York Times report, there's considerable
dispute about how much Hillary had to do with any effort to threaten a
As you know, the objections to what Trump said on that tape are not to his
potty mouth, so if Hillary does have a potty mouth (doubtful, considering the
sources), it's irrelevant.
Bringing up irrelevancies and pretending they're meaningful, as you do all the
time, is just another form of lyin
As you know, you're the one who's lying. And you never used to be honest, so
it's not at all weird that you're lying now.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
You need to stop the lying - it's just too weird, becase you used to be so
honest. What happened?
"The Hindu/Yoga Su
Why Debate Night Won't End Trump's Nightmare
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/10/why-debate-night-wont-end-trump-tapes/503519/
Why Debate Night Won't End Trump's Nightmare
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/10/why-debate-night-wont-end-trump-tapes/503519/
Dona
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
(snip)
He certainly appeared nervous/agitated up there. He couldn't sit still or
stand still and kept hovering over her, at least it appeared that way from the
camera angle.
Both the Twitterati and the media also noticed his "hovering."
Trump supporter, hmm?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
I take it from the content here that no one here practices TM
Or if they do, get any benefits from TM, or display any of the intelligence or
behavior that is supposed to result from TM.
Maybe the group could b
Oh, sorry. It's just that we've come to associate Trump supporters with boorish
behavior.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
No
From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 4:17 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife]
As you know, the objections to what Trump said on that tape are not to his
potty mouth, so if Hillary does have a potty mouth (doubtful, considering the
sources), it's irrelevant.
Bringing up irrelevancies and pretending they're meaningful, as you do all the
time, is just another form of lyin
She tried to decline to take the case but was pressured into it (as you know).
No, of course she wasn't the girl's champion. She was the (unwilling) champion
of the man accused of raping her.
And she didn't "accuse" the girl of fantasizing about sex with older men (as
you know).
Hillar
GOP ex-prosecutors slam Trump over threat to 'jail' Clinton
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/trump-clinton-jail-ex-prosecutors-slam-229547
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/trump-clinton-jail-ex-prosecutors-slam-229547
GOP ex-prosecutors slam Trump over threat to 'jail&#...
h
Bringing up irrelevancies and pretending they're meaningful, as you do all the
time, is just another form of lying.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Anyone would be crazy to think that Hillary Clinton would install a home-brew
computer in her basement in order to bypass
I'm sorry, "My Maharishi"?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Didn't your Maharishi say something like "as you are so you are faced with?"
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Oh, sorry. It's just that we've come to associate Trump supporters with
boorish beh
Bringing up irrelevancies and pretending they're meaningful, as you do all the
time, is just another form of lying.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Anyone would be crazy to think that I would post irrelevancies, or post lies
on this forum, or make negative comments about
Vengeance
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/projects/cp/opinion/clinton-trump-second-debate-election-2016/vengeance
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/projects/cp/opinion/clinton-trump-second-debate-election-2016/vengeance
Vengeance
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/projects/cp/opin
It should be noted that with the exception of Doug, the "consideration of
proposals" he describes is not taking place among those who post to this group.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Archer Angel writes:
Maybe the group could be renamed to something more in line wi
It's irrelevant to the issue of Trump's threat to investigate and jail Hillary
if he's elected. Read the article I linked to--or even just the excerpt I
posted.
She did nothing criminal--that's already been extensively investigated--so
it's irrelevant from that perspective as well.
(The f
I don't know about the identity of ArchonAngel, but I do lean toward the belief
that the "consideration" going on is between Doug and . . . Doug. I also think
Doug hopes to implement a plan for FFL that he has had in mind since well
before taking it over.
Why he can't just start another group
No.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
When the Dow speaks everyone listens. Does it mean that Trump is done?
Dow closes 200 points lower as rates rise and oil slides
http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/dow-closes-200-points-lower-as-rates-rise-and-oil-slides/ar-BBxic
The funny thing is, there's virtually nothing equivalent on the other side to
these moronic anti-Hillary videos. There's no need to make stuff up about
Trump. Lots of videos of comedians making fun of him, plenty of clips of him
saying ridiculous things, but nothing *invented*. Just the real Tru
I just saw this on Politico:
President of Iowa Republican women's group resigns over Trump
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/iowa-federation-republican-women-resigns-trump-229660
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/iowa-federation-republican-women-resigns-trump-229660
President
Lovely tribute to Dylan from Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo:
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/a-few-thoughts-on-dylan-s-big-day
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/a-few-thoughts-on-dylan-s-big-day
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Finally.! Actuall
Heather Digby Parton made the point in an article on Salon today, after quoting
Trump:
That's right, the same man who staged a televised stunt just four days ago in
which he sanctimoniously slammed Democratic presidential nominee Hillary
Clinton for supposedly trashing the reputations of ass
I was thinking the same thing. They've probably slunk off with their tails
between their legs to hide out in The_Closet.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
The Trump supporters on this forum have gone very quiet. I wonder why?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
“This is the first week in nearly six weeks that I have thought Hillary would
win Iowa, given all of Trump's demographic advantages,” said one Iowa
Republican“Donald Trump is in a virtual meltdown as a surge of requested
early ballots start reaching voters. Trump's collapse is a perfect
You're right. It hadn't occurred to me--I guess because it was so obvious--but
Parton's column is the only place I've seen the point made explicitly.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Heather Digby Parton made the point in
Actually, Bhairitu, if you did just a little critical thinking, you'd realize
this nuclear hoo-hah is about Putin trying to scare Americans into electing
Trump, because Putin knows how easy it will be to manipulate him. So Putin is
painting Hillary as the candidate who wants war with Russia and
Jill Stein (no relation, thank goodness) is a doofus.
Hillary isn't going to "slide into nuclear war very quickly." Or at all,,for
that matter, if she can possibly help it.
Trump, on the other hand, might well do so. He's crazier than Putin realizes.
And no, we don't have a choice other
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
That's the whole point. It's the classic Saul Alinsky tactic. If you are
busted for something, deny it and accuse your accuser of the same, but louder.
Actually, that's a classic *Karl Rove* tactic.
The problem here is that Bill Clinton's
Two more actual women have come out with stories of Trump groping them:
Two more women say Donald Trump sexually assaulted them: “It was very random,
very nonchalant”
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/14/another-woman-says-donald-trump-sexually-assaulted-her-it-was-very-random-very-nonchalant/
Just found another mention of this, in an article in TheAtlantic.com:
One spectacular irony in all of this is how Trump’s tactics mirror the
criticism he’s lobbed at his opponent. In the second presidential debate, he
claimed Hillary Clinton “attacked” the women who accused her husband of sex
This must be a really old article. There has been no mystery about who runs the
site since I started using it many years ago.
About snopes.com http://www.snopes.com/info/aboutus.asp
About snopes.com http://www.snopes.com/info/aboutus.asp The snopes.com website
was founded by David Mikkelso
Probably the kind of idiots who won't do anything that would lead to the whole
Internet becoming unreliable.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Oh great! You think that Yahoo has problems now just wait because if
this starts the whole Internet will become unreliable. And pe
Of course he's trying to influence the election. And note that this "report" is
from the extremely right-wing Newsmax.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Or, is he trying to influence the American election by tacitly endorsing
Trump?
Report: Putin Possibly Readying for
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Bill's accusers came forward immediately.
Not true.
Kathleen Willey and Paula Jones didn't go public for five years. Juanita
Broaddrick, for 20 years.
Most of Trump's accusers came out much less than 30 years later.
Trumps,
Dear Doug, It's OK, you can use my name and attack me directly instead of Card.
Be brave! We could actually have a discussion, you know. Card hasn't been
fighting with anybody; it's not right to attack him when you're really angry
with me.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Coming forward doesn't mean going *public*.
(horselaugh) Oh. Well, OK, if "coming forward" no longer means "going public,"
but rather "told friends about it," many of Trump's accusers did exactly that
shortly, or immediately, after their enc
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
(snip)
There is no evidence that Trump did any of these allegations, just last minute
accusations at the end of a political campaign that Democrats are famous for.
In fact, the first woman to make the accusations has been totally discredited
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Heavens to Betsy, JR! You quoted a "right-wing" news source! Mother Superior
Jooday will give you 50 lashes with her ruler.
Nothing wrong with quoting a right-wing news source as long as its bias is
taken into account.
Not that Newsmax
There are oogobs of reasons to fear Trump's election, including (but not
limited to) his threat to "tighten up" libel laws and sue the media when he
doesn't like what they say about him.
There's zero evidence that either Carlos Slim or Jeff Bezos has attempted to
slant the WaPo's or the NYTim
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
(snip)
Of course we have our resident "shamer" troll who tries shame anyone who has a
liberal view if they quote a "right wing source" even if that source is
correct. Shame on that troll!
Not true, Bhairitu.
Bhairitu, this is an idiotic line of attack. When you have to make stuff up out
of whole cloth to throw at those who don't agree with you, it's a really good
sign you have no arguments.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
BTW, I'm wondering why Mother Superior didn't shame
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Bhairitu,
My intent was to present interesting news developments in the world,
regardless of the source. Assuming that the news is correct, one has to
wonder why Putin is recalling his people home. It's probably far fetch to
assu
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
It was too long for me.I changed the channel shortly after Carly made her
comment about Planned Parenthood. I was sold on her by that point.
What you were sold was a bill of goods, unfortunately. She said:
“Anyone who has watched this vid
The normally staid New York Times Editorial Board was practically apoplectic
yesterday about what transpired at the debate. From the lead editorial:
"Peel back the boasting and insults, the lies and exaggerations common to any
presidential campaign. What remains is a collection of assertions s
These are non sequiturs, Mike. Gosnell was a butcher and a criminal and had
nothing to do with Planned Parenthood. As to the woman who survived an
abortion, obviously something got screwed up with the clinic's procedures. That
isn't what normally happens.
The funding issue actually has to do
P.S.: The Gosnell videos and the testimony of the woman who survived an
abortion are not the imaginary scene Fiorina described.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
These are non sequiturs, Mike. Gosnell was a butcher and a criminal and had
nothing to do with Planned Parenthood. As t
Mike, you've gone way off into fantasyland now. Women don't decide to have an
abortion because the government tells them to. Up until Roe v. Wade, of course,
government *prohibited* abortion. And these days it's state governments
(Republican-run) that are doing their damndest to make abortion as
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
No, our government doesn't dare force anyone to have an abortion. That would
cause a revolt.
I didn't say anything about "forcing." *You* said the government "talks them
into it," but it doesn't do that either.
But they sure let you kno
S3raphita, get your dates in order. The election isn't for another 13 months;
the parties' presidential candidates won't be nominated until this summer.
Anything can happen between now and then. And why on earth would you be
thinking the Maharishi Effect would be favoring Trump for president in
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Yes, it could be which is dependent on who the Democrats will choose for their
candidate. IMO, Trump is the worst candidate that the Republicans could choose
for a candidate. You see, Trump only appeals to the extreme right of the
Republicans, wh
John, do you know what "populism" is? I can't imagine why you'd say a Democrat
(which I am) wouldn't consider Trump a populist.
As to how I know he won't be running for president, just the other day I
checked out the entrails of a bat.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Yeah, there is a pretty strong bias against yogic science in the West.
Possibly even a racial prejudice. Yoga did not evolve out of either the Western
sciences or religions, and as such, is considered suspect by many.
In terms of Western science
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Why would NASA speak about colonizing *anything*??
ollieollieollie, it was you who just wrote, "When asked, the people involved
mention some fantasy about colonizing other planets."
It sort of proves my point that such a fantasy is centurie
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
The NASA blurb is all self-serving PR about how their current missions will
allow them further exploration of space. Not even a replacement for TANG has
been developed - lol...As for satellite tech, yes that is useful, and why I
restricted my c
He believes the earth existed for a long time before God decided to start
creating...but then it took God only six 24-hour days to finish the job.
Seriously. That's what he says he believes.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
MD,
I know he graduated from Yale and has a
He's been very clear that he means human 24-hour days, Mike. He explicitly
rejects the "million years to a day" notion. Sorry!
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Of course, what is a *day* or an *hour* in the life of God? The Vedic
literature refers to millions/billion of our year
And the thing is, this country explicitly forbids any kind of religious litmus
test for presidential eligibility.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Carson's religious beliefs are in fact no more strange than that of most
evangelical Christians. I don't see that as dooming his cand
Carson--speaking for himself--is apparently not interested in Daniel's
calculations or the concept of "divine timelines." He explicitly rejects
anything but six 24-hour human days as the time it took God to do Creation from
start to finish (plus one such day of rest, of course). Ain't no wiggle
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
BTW Judy, here is a photo of my Peregrine falcon that I caught a couple of
years ago. Sandy is getting ready for the hunting season right now. See
attachment below.
She sure is gorgeous.
FWIW, this is from Newsmax, a very right-wing and highly unreliable "news"
outlet. Not only that, it isn't from a Newsmax article, it's from a reader
comment--in other words, no editorial control or fact-checking. The dude who
wrote it has sent and posted it all over the place (do a Google searc
FYI, "shooting the messenger" refers to a *blameless* messenger. It isn't
shooting the messenger to point out that he is unreliable, especially when his
message accuses somebody of criminal acts.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Judy, you're just shooting the messen
P.S.: In jurisprudence, it's called "impeaching the witness" and is entirely
legal.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
FYI, "shooting the messenger" refers to a *blameless* messenger. It isn't
shooting the messenger to point out that he is unreliable, especially when his
message a
It's meaningless if the messenger isn't blameless. Of course you want people to
know if the messenger is unreliable and biased. It's a warning that they should
reserve judgment.
He makes too many assertions for me to check them out; I don't have the time
or resources. And I never said he lied
I didn't accuse him of criminal activity, Mike. BIG difference.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
But didn't you just do to him what you're accusing him of doing to Hillary,
questioning the integrity of the person in question?
From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: Fairfi
BTW, Mike, the mainstream media would be *thrilled* to be able to document a
genuine Clinton scandal with actual facts. If they haven't done so this time
around, it's because the facts just ain't there.
BTW 2, the mainstream media isn't all that "librul." They're centrist. And the
Republican
Actually, Mike, Rubio told a bunch of falsehoods. Have a look at this article
from Slate.com by William Saletan:
Marco Rubio Has Decided His Best Strategy Is to Lie About Hillary Clinton and
Benghazi
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2015/11/marco_rubio_is_lying_about_h
Just to be clear, Mike, I wasn't accusing you of being dishonest; I don't think
you are. I do think you're seriously misled by what you're reading and hearing
from the right wing media and politicians.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
(snip)
And no, it isn't at all "interesti
Even though he's often just as critical of liberals...I see.
You could always look at Factcheck.org's timeline (Saletan links to it). You
can verify the entries to make sure they're accurate, because they give you
explicit citations for each one.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
Read the whole article, not just the first few paragraphs. Saletan uses lots of
different sources for the things Clinton said, including videotape of her
saying them that shows Rubio to have misrepresented her statements.
And if you look at the Times reports Saletan cites, they obviously didn'
One more thing, Mike.
You gave no source for what you posted; I had to track it down. Nor does the
piece itself give any sources for any of its claims.
In contrast, I linked to Saletan's article in Slate.com. And it is impeccable
in citing sources for all its assertions, as well as acknowl
Ohhh, Mike, you're smarter than this, better than this. The vast majority of
Saletan's sources are from the public record--e.g., video of Clinton's public
remarks, text of her public statements. You can watch and read them for
yourself. Nowhere does she blame the attack on just the video, contra
Here's the commencement speech:
The Andrews Experience- Dr. Ben Carson 1998 Graduation key note speaker
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrqShRhxJBM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrqShRhxJBM
The Andrews Experience- Dr. Ben Carson 1998 Graduati...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrqSh
Yup. Dude needs brain surgery.
Whose idiocy was the Mars rover on the moon? I missed that.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Gz. That ranks right up there with wanting the Mars rover to roll over to
the American flag planted by the first Astronauts to land on the mo
Well, what you describe of Schapiro's piece is iffy as well. "Had dinner with"
implies a tete-a-tete, but apparently this was a brief exchange--according to
Carson's own spokesman--at a banquet. And it wasn't on the date Carson said it
was.
My guess on this is that the guy who ghost-wrote Car
The NYTimes just put up a story on this. Excerpt:
In an interview with The New York Times on Friday, Mr. Carson said: “I don’t
remember all the specific details. Because I had done so extraordinarily well
you know I was told that someone like me – they could get a scholarship to West
Point.
dead link for Schapiro
If I had attacked people as a teen, it's very likely everyone in my school
would have known about it, and I'd have had a reputation for violence.
Don't give me "liberal hit pieces." Right-wingers are the hit-piece champions.
Politico has done plenty of hit pieces on
Yes, I found the Shapiro article earlier. Thing is, in all Carson's retellings
of the West Point story, he *implies* that he applied, was accepted, and was
granted a full scholarship, but decided not to go. What he said was distinctly
misleading, and it appears Politico was misled.
CNN talked
ROTC was not in a position to "offer to send him to West Point," nor to "offer"
him a "scholarship." There are no "scholarships" to West Point anyway; once
you've been accepted, it's free. ROTC was only in a position to recommend him
if he wanted to go, which he didn't. There's a big difference
It's not at all amazing. His shtick is the confessional redemption narrative,
how he was lost, then turned into a wonderful person when he found God. If
that's your cuppa tea, his misspent youth will make him very appealing. It's
what has sold his books and what he hopes will propel him into the
??? What do Hillary's emails have to do with it?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
ROFLMAO! Nothing to hide verses 30,000 E-mails.
From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, November 8, 2015 9:22 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLif
What does that have to do with anything I said? I was responding directly to
your point; please do me the same courtesy rather than changing the subject.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
The FBI is looking into it. Are they looking into Ben Carson?
From: "authfriend@... [Fai
Hillary herself isn't under investigation, Mike. The FBI's investigation has to
do with the security of her server.
And Carson has had no problem convincing people that he was a "bad boy." It's
the basis of his popularity, as I said already. That's now being questioned by
a few, but it isn't
It's the State Department emails they're concerned about, of course. What is
your *problem*, Mike? You just aren't making any sense.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Why would the security of her server be an issue if they were only Yoga
routines and Chelsea wedding plans?
No, she separated the personal from the State Department emails. You know this.
I have no idea what game you're playing, but it sure doesn't do you any credit.
It appears that you're doing your best to avoid the Carson issues.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Mixed in wit
There aren't any "clips of the attacks," and the talking heads (and anchors and
correspondents and witnesses) are live.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
One thing we know for sure: Americans will be glued to their TVs tonight
watching repetitive clips of the attacks and talking
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Gosh, I guess I've been imagining all the news clips from Paris then shown on
CNN.com, Sky and a few other news sites.
If you thought they were footage of the attacks, yes, you were imagining them.
FYI, "talking heads" refers to the "experts
Just for the record, three of the attackers have been identified as French
citizens. The other four (or five) have not yet been identified. The possible
eighth attacker, who is still at large, lived in Belgium, as did two of the
French attackers and a bunch of people who are suspected of involve
If I were a Muslim living in Paris, or just in France, I'd feel like I was
taking my life in my hands to go on some kind of mass march. Too many
right-wing haters could take a shot at me in ostensible retaliation.
A lot of Muslims have taken to social media to denounce the attacks; at least
t
This is hilarious. Jim and I pop in for brief visits, leave a few posts each,
and Barry and Salyavin spring into full-on jibbering-idiot mode, slapping
together a tag-team pastiche of stupid mistakes, lies, misrepresentations, and
wildly illogical "analyses."
Funniest of all, they portray Ji
Here's a start, a twofer from salyavin at his dimwittiest:
If the peaksters want her as their queen bee I'm happy for them but it does
underline what I'm going on about as far as self awareness goes.
How about just *general* awareness of what's going on around you? I haven't
left any po
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Perhaps they were under the impression, based on what was said, these
particular persons would not return to FFL ever.
You wouldn't be referring to Jim and me, would you? Are you afraid to state
our names?
Actually if they were under that im
And now a couple from Barry. He writes:
One would think that if a person is trying to claim they "left" FFL for
positive reasons, they shouldn't undercut that claim by coming back every so
often to prove that she's still *just as negative as ever* and towards *the
same people as ever*
Ba
901 - 1000 of 1336 matches
Mail list logo
