. At it's best, it's surprisingly close to the Nikon 8000,
but persuading the film to be flat without wet mounting might be hard.
David J. Littleboy
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to listser
.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think we are having an unecessary argument
Agreed. Take it off list.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
the car, the
first vehicle past stopped to ask if we were lost.
That would NEVER happen in England now unfortunatly.
David.
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners
in its A/D converter
doesn't mean you have X bits of valid data in the output files.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners
for twice the resolution at a much wider f stop may be problematic.)
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe
resolution by it's snap-to-grid effect
which puts features in the wrong place; it's an artificial sharpening trick
at best.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL
6x7. ;-)
I like my Mamiya 7, too. But it doesn't replace an SLR, and you have to need
to print larger than A3 to need 6x7.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL
equal a
prime lens but that may be changing) but I try to stay within its
limitations - shoot at the lowest ISO that I can get away with and
control exposure time to stay within a range of f:4 to f:11.
Yep. The Tamron 28-75/2.8 does amazing work here on the 5D.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED
of a glass case on the dusty
second floor of a used camera shop here in Tokyo, and when I stood up and
turned around, there was a Fuji GX-680 on the top shelf of the case behind
me ready to pounce. I practically had a heart attack; that guy's enormous.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
to CLA the Nikon 8000, pick up a cheap EOS film
body, and do the work. But there's real work in the inbox, a guitar to be
practiced, old photographs to be processed, and new photographs to be
taken...
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
if the bloke who made the print displayed next to
yours used MF or 12MP digital.)
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners
angels on heads of pins.
And the 12.7 and 16MP Canons look a lot more like 645 than 35mm, in terms of
print quality at 12x18. (This guy is printing a lot bigger than I would, and
thus is agonizing over really minor differences.)
http://www.shortwork.net/equip/review-1Ds-SQ-scantech/
David J
like nobody has been able to get a LS30 to work with
Vista.
A shame really, as although I'm digital, Canon DSLR I still have a few years
worth of slides to scan, so I'll have to keep XP until I've finished.
David.
- Original Message -
From: Arthur Entlich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
I stripped mine down recently following
http://www.vad1.com/photo/dirty-scanner/ls2000-cleaning/ the mirrors and
lenses were thick with dust.
David
- Original Message -
From: Scott McLoughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 4:21 PM
Subject
.
As you say Laurie, Vista just doesn't recognize the SCSI card.
I've found that for most things that Vista doesn't like, by installing in
compatibility mode, seems to get around them.
You guys here were my last resort !
David.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
to.
Thanks,
David.
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
. :-)
People claim they can see amazing differences between drum scans and Nikon
scans. I can't.
http://www.terrapinphoto.com/jmdavis/lws_8000.jpg
http://www.terrapinphoto.com/jmdavis/lws_4500.jpg
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
, I'd think US$400 or so would be worth the investment.
Also, you can ebay the thing when you are done with it and get some of that
back.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail
niceties like still having a liver 5 years from now seem more important than
5% sharper scans.
*: And would love to see someone try it on the Epson 4870.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
a bit better.)
The new Canon 350D with, say, the 24/2.8 (functions like a 38mm lens) would
give the XA a run for the money (and kill the XA at ISO 800 or 1600) and not
be a lot larger. (The 350D + 24/2.8 weighs 590 + 270 or so grams.)
http://www.photo.net/equipment/canon/digital_rebel_xt/
David J
the Pentax
*istD and Canon 350D are quite awkward to hold. Most people find them
perfectly usable.
David J. Littleboy
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners
to the list from a new member. I do need to experiment with
scanning BW film as a positive and see what I get going that route.
Didn't I just say thatg.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe
+ NikonScan does a good job of giving me something usable for
slides. (I have a bit of a love/hate relationship with color negative
materials, mostly hate.)
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
could scan at 14 bits, 4x or 8x, and set black/white points and futz
with curves in PS (well, PWP) later. Sigh.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
/pderocco/image/36593399
In the foreground, the artificial edge invention looks like some exotic
Photoshop special effect.
(Next gets the GF one.)
Thanks for posting that: I had been wondering what it did, and now I know I
don't need itg.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
! It's a real pleasure to see someone being sensibleg. Providing GEM as
a standalone separate from the scanning phase is clearly the right idea.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe
requires that you
get it right at scan time.
(Truth in advertising: I scan into Picture Window Pro, and GEM crashes PWP,
so I don't use it. Ouch.)
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe
computer
that's quite a bit faster, so I'm planning on trying again.
My basic take is that high-res film scans need noise reduction, and
NeatImage does a good job.
There's also NoiseNinja that a lot of peole like, but I don't know if it has
a MAC version.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo
.)
However, looking at the glass holder, it looks to me as though it will hold
a three 6x7 frame strip without problem. As long as the strip is less than
23 cm long.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
- Original Message -
From: Lotus M50 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
From: Bob Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED] asks:
With a slide copier on the front of your digital camera,
who needs a scanner?
Medium and large format users.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
, then:
- does it matter what software package you use with the 5400,
- what is the best setting to get the neg (both color and bw) scanned (16
bit, 16 bit linear, positive, whatever).
Best,
-David Ray Carson
web: http://www.davidraycarson.com/
At 01:46 AM 8/18/2004, you wrote:
Ok, my head is swimming
dissolver off with color neg, don't know with b/w neg
Best,
David Carson
web: http://www.davidraycarson.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ed,
I think what I'm trying to get at is: Given a person with good
Photoshop
skills, is it an easier path to simply scan the neg in and modify
Yes the Minolta DSMP can scan Xpan at 4800, and also
offers excellent Dmax. I utilise the multi-format
holder for Xpan, but others have adapted 35mm holders.
___ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger -
all new features - even more fun!
filter.
Most frustrating. This pdf is Japanese only.
Salutations, David Lewiston
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate
From: David Lewiston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does Agfa still make RSX (ISO 50)?
I'll have to look into this. Is it virtually grainless, like K25?
I've never used it: it appears in a 2-year old brochure that happens to be
sitting on my desk.
Again, there's a Zeiss article* in which they kvetch
is noticeably shy of 2700 dpi. That's pretty
good, but for 35mm, you'd probably be better off with a real scanner.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
http://www.photo-i.co.uk/Reviews/interactive/Epson%204870/page_6.htm
with a flatbed with a transparency attachment?
If your 35mm use is minimal, and 6x6 is your main camera, the 4870 may keep
you happy.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail
slide emulsion that is also
essentially grainless.
Recommendations, please?
Thanks, David Lewiston
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest
From: David Lewiston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
K25 is no longer manufactured in the U.S. Is it still available in other
countries?
Not Japan. I'm pretty sure it's ancient history everywhere.
If it isn't, then I'll have to look for another slide emulsion that is also
essentially grainless
, David L
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
From: David Lewiston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not sure about 20x enlargements though: I consider 13x seriously
excessive. (Hi, my name is Dave, and I'm a grain sniffer.)
Imacon 5600 dpi scans from K25 make grainless giclée prints at 18 x 24,
from somewhat less than full frame, hence 20X
scanning it as a color negative or as a color positive, and
picking whichever of those looks better.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
for a 645 frame. Ouch.
Still, very much worth trying. Most have free demo or home versions you can
play with.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
100F is WONDERFUL
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest
of the
spectral response are such that there are strong valleys and peaks, and that
those valleys and peaks vary from batch to batch. So the Nikon scanners can
have wildly different responses to different batches of Kodachrome.
Sounded sensible and possible, but I've never shot Kodachrome...
David J
hundred dollars from the price that
the fine art giclée printer here on Maui wanted for the same work.
Salutations, David Lewiston
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners
a bit better
than the 2450 or 3200, both of which have great DOF...
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe
that the unevenness in the film
emulsion should prevent Newton rings most of the time. Wrong. But they knew
they were wrong and provide masksg. (Actually, I cut my own masks because
the masks they provide only mask one frame.)
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
(see the article on
Luminous Landscape) I've ever seen (if it is pepper grain). I think Kodak
messed up the processing.
If that scan was made without ICE, you might try an ICE scan. ICE cleans up
pepper grain nicely.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Hi Tony,
I would like to unsubscribe from the filmscanners list, many thanks for
creating it, have enjoyed and benefited from it. Thanks.
Kind regards,
David Tucker
The essence of a celebration
http://www.dtuckerphoto.com
e mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
I have found after several re installations, that the latest version of
Nikon Scan works without crashing, with Adaptec Aspi 4.60, on an XP SP1
setup.
The latest Aspi versions cause / allow Nk Scan to crash frequently.
David.
Has anyone successfully installed an LS30 on XP? Any issues I
put words in my mouth.
Do you think that I'm wrong in that???
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe
).
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
be a thing of
amazing beauty. Stitch together four 6MP dSLR images and print it at 16x24,
and you'll have a print that 35mm can never dream of, whatever printing
technology you use.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
cornered patches of color are pretty obvious
to us. It is the reason camouflage works so well, our eyes and brain
don't register ill-defined edges of similar colors well.
Again, there's no reason to see pixels in larger digital images at all.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
originals.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
pixels, strikes me as seriously problematic.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest
out of a 35mm frame than a 4000 dpi
scanner. I suspect that it's not enough of a difference to be significant.
(None of the Minolta 5400 scans of actual images I've seen showed
significant improvement over 4000 dpi scans, although the test chart images
look a lot better.)
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL
into close to 10D quality. Maybe the better 35mm lenses are
sharper than my Mamiya MF lenses, and some 35mm scans can be downsampled to
2700 dpi. Whatever. There are lots of people who come up with 9MP or so as
the digital equivalent of 35.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
an enlarger print is not so much that you can actually see
that resolution
from a normal viewing distance, but that a 10% MTF at 6 lp/mm is a good
predictor of a 80%+
MTF at 2-3 lp/mm, which is what really matters.
Agreed. This is, IMHO, exactly right.
David J. Littleboy
Tokyo, Japan
find that they
aren't quite good enough.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest
) makes doing my own processing unattractive. Sigh.)
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest
haven't dealt with that as such yet. Inversely, my scans on
my 14-bit scanner are a noisy mess, even slide film, so I'm willing to
listen to arguments that 8-bits is more than enough (and that scanner Dmax
claims are completely and totally insaneg).
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
LAURIE SOLOMON [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, thanks. While there may be such a program out there, I have not seen
one for PC systems to the best of my knowledge;
Picture Window Pro handles 16-bit data everywhere.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Brad Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Except on a MAC... Unfortunately.
Stubbornness has its costs
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
LAURIE SOLOMON [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thank you David. I am not familiar with that application; although come to
think of it, I think I may have heard you or someone else mention it before.
Picture Window Pro's user interface is a tad funky, but it's curves control
is absolutely
about it
relative to this debate, Dickie, oh, I mean David ;-)
Touché!
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners
version out with Neat Image like noise reduction/sharpening.
The bad news, though, is that 16-bits per channel is not a panacea. If the
original data is bad, editing will make it worse. And scanner output is
pretty funky.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
doesn't have a curves tool, although it's high
on the author's list of things to add. What it does have support for is
color calibration.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail
favors, but Vuescan gave you full manual control over everything
the scanner did.
and well worth the
price of admission for people who want more automated scanning.
You're still doing cheapshots: it's not pretty.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
the ONE WAY sign. (Diagonals seem to survive (see
the finer wires) but the fat wires are a jaggy mess (those are jaggies, not
twisted pair cables).) At first glance there seems to be a lot of detail,
but it's all aliasing artifacts.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
a D100 or 10D. The 1Ds, on the other hand, has a much better
viewfinder (a real joy to look through) than any of the affordable cameras,
but makes my Mamiya 645 ProTL feel like an Olympus PenF by comparison. An
amazingly heavy, awkward, bulky camera.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
, sharpen lightly, downsample to 2000 dpi, and sharpen
lightly again. You'll get an image that is just as good as (if not better
than) any DSLR image, and has 13MP or so.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
would have
thought. I shoot a lot of urban stuff, and that would really irritate me no
end.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe
installed on your computer. Delete half your
fonts and try again.
Or use Picture Window Pro.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners
adjustments in 16/48-bit mode as possible.
(Sorry about the noise if you're already doing this.)
David J. Littleboy
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners
, and that I'm not doing that well with the
scanner. And I haven't seen any scans on the net that were any better than
what I'm getting...
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail
that detail onto the print. My conclusion would be that MR's
photoshop technique is poor, but he concluded that MF has less resolution.
It's like the three laws of thermodynamics: You can't win, you can't break
even, and you can't get out of the game.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
shape, in terms of products. About the
only obvious holes are an MF scanner in the US$1000 to US$1500 price range
and a pigment ink inkjet in the A4 (letter/legal) size.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
rings, but was ring-free
when scanned upside down. Sharpness was fine.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners
, but I guess people
were kicking him about that and he came throughg. He's pretty amazing.
I can't speak to how important that is, since I still have a lot to learn
about color...
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
infer from the definitions used at the above web page, that it _is_ a very
good approximation.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe
Todd Flashner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, I suppose if one is convinced that DYR is a resolution that is the way
they'd have to approach it as such, but David, tell me, have you seen a
cited reference that supports that approach?
http://www.chipcenter.com/dsp/DSP000329F1.html
The dynamic
, and that the size of that range is given by the
worse of the noise in the electronics or the bit resolution of the scanner.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
and I disagree, but if you think they are
different, then we all agree. That's all there is here.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe
of the
individual values are determined by the meanings of the endpoints and how
finely the actual range is chopped up, but it is the density range that
determines the meaning of the endpoints.)
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
if you're getting the same effect. If you are, that
would rule out Vuescan.
I have the same scanner, and find that I use Insight for scanning slides,
reserving Vuescan for negs. I haven't had a problem with Insight.
David
experience with in-camera sharpening
(consumer dcams) is that it has too low threshold setting and aggravates
noise something fierce, but maybe scanner sharpening isn't so obnoxious...)
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Qimage print it.)
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate
, signal amplitudes.
David J. Littleboy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate
Recently, I've been having focus problems with my SS4000+, which I use on a
Mac, firewire and OS9.2.
When I purchased the unit, the scans were razor (grain) sharp using both
silverfast and polacolor software. Since it's last firmware update, or so it
seems, the unit's focus seems to have gone
Preben wrote:
Should we perhaps leave it to the *eyes of the beholder*, instead of
stooping to sweeping generalisations.
All copyrighted material deserves protection against commercial pirating if
the originator so wishes...
RIGHT ON! RIGHT ON!! RIGHT ON!!!
an octogenarian to have amassed such a bottomless pool of
enigmatic-yet-pragmatic information/advice. I would like to take this
moment in time space...to salute you for being *the* undisputed cyberspace
hydrant-of-esoteric-knowledge that you are!
Joyfully, -david soderman-
P.S.-- What do you do with Ansel
David Soderman writes: But it's not quite that easy nor as cut-and-
dried as the above.
Anthony Atkielski writes: There aren't any other options. Anything you put
on the site is likely to be stolen. Anything you do not want stolen should
not be put on the site.
David
. He seems to have an exaggerated opinion of
his *own* opinion. Tell me, is it actually possible to be a caricature of
one's very own self?!? ;-)
Joyfully, -david soderman-
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL
of other 4000+ users here, and I know some updated their
firmware. Just to make sure, which firmware version did you install?
Art
David Sirola wrote:
Recently, I've been having focus problems with my SS4000+, which I use on a
Mac, firewire and OS9.2.
When I purchased the unit, the scans
your quotations and placed them side-by-side into the
Light.
You've described the depth of your *sincerity* above.
I acknowledge and respect the concept of your sincerity.
However, I also submit to you that sincerity and *truth* are not necessarily
one and the same.
Joyfully, -david soderman
: the collective
consensus of Scan Multi Pro users.
I also happen to know that Mr. Art E. has a very good *personal* reason to
take stake in the fine efforts of this website's creator/moderator!
So here's a toast...to the importance of always having a keen sense of
humor!
Joyfully, -david soderman
Hi Brad,
Yes, I agree - really annoying ! But that's not a bug. Its a 'delay tactic'
to make you buy it ! I remember that happened to me...the spinning wheel
went away once you had entered the serial number into your copy.
Regards, David
--
You can view David's on-line folio at http
1 - 100 of 554 matches
Mail list logo
