Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
> Sheesh! Maybe a macro would help.
Erm. You can mass copy a tuplet to an arbitrarily large selection range
(vertical as well as horizontal) in a matter of a few seconds using my
Mass Copy plugin. Better than a macro by far.
--
Robert Patterson
http://RobertGPatters
Hello, I have hundreds of measures full of 16th notes, in 18/16
time sig. I'd like to convert all this to 16th-note triplets, in
3/4. No problem changing time sig and converting to tuplets one
tuplet at a time, BUT: is there a way to select a region and
"tupletize" the whole region in one go?
At 4:55 PM -0500 11/23/03, David H. Bailey wrote:
You can't go back in speedy and tupletize notes which have already
been entered.
Yes you can, but it only works for ONE set of tuplets, then you have
to reset it. Not a good solution for Charles.
Open up the Speedy frame on a measure of already
Dang, I was SURE I had done this about a month ago! I tried it again
(same version of Finale as always, FinMac 2003) and it didn't work!
I did find two rather laborious methods to change existing 16th notes
to triplets. One was to select the Simple Entry tool, set it to 16ths
(3 key) and tuplet
Well I'll be darned -- I never went that extra step. I figured that
Finale already knew that my first note that I was hitting ctrl-3 on was
a 16th note and figured it just couldn't be done.
I wonder why Finale doesn't know that first note already is a 16th note,
though. It's certainly displayi
For the first time today, I decided to try to scan a printed music sheet
(Eb Cornet part from an old Brass Band set) and import it into Finale.
I scanned it to a *.tif file, and saved it.
Then, when I tried to import it using SmartScore lite/light/whatever
it's called, I got the following error me
David wrote:
> You can't go back in speedy and tupletize notes which
> have already been entered.
Why not? I do that all the time ...
Never mind caps lock, you just have to hit Ctrl-3 (on Windows) on the first note
and then press the key corresponding to its symbolic duration once more.
--
To
You can't go back in speedy and tupletize notes which have already been
entered.
Richard Huggins wrote:
I didn't write the original question but I was interested in seeing if what
you said would indeed work on a measure of existing 16th notes (turning them
into tuplets). I repeated your steps
I didn't write the original question but I was interested in seeing if what
you said would indeed work on a measure of existing 16th notes (turning them
into tuplets). I repeated your steps and for me it did not work the way you
said. After setting Caps Lock and doing Option-3, I hit the 3 key on t
On Sunday, November 23, 2003, at 05:19 AM, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
I take weights of numbers into account when deciding my choral splits
(though I don't go nuts about it like some do), so I don't think I get
exactly the same results from T, B1, B2 (nor T1, T2, B) as I would
from T, Bar, B.
- Original Message -
> >> It's the old "The razor's free but the blades cost money" philosophy
> >> that made Gillette wealthy.
I think the greatest example in recent technology would be pdf files. Adobe
eagerly distributes the Acrobat Reader for free to make the Distiller worth
buying f
That's true, but Gillette figured that the vast majority of people
wouldn't bother making their own since the price of manufactured razor
blades is so cheap.
I'm sure that's the logic behind iTunes being free -- most people aren't
going to buy CDs anymore and bother ripping the songs they want.
iTunes download site should be here:
http://www.apple.com/itunes/download/
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
On Sunday, November 23, 2003, at 05:49 AM, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
It's the old "The razor's free but the blades cost money" philosophy
that made Gillette wealthy. You have to pay for the songs you
download to listen to with iTunes, but iTunes itself is free.
Eh? I have a ton of my own mus
On Sunday, November 23, 2003 5:26 AM, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wondered:
> At 07:20 AM 11/23/03 -0500, David H. Bailey wrote:
> >iTunes is free -- it'll screw up your installation of WinAmp
>
> Are you sure about that? And how does it manifest itself? I'm
> always wary
> of Apple software on the PC
At 7:20 AM -0500 11/23/03, David H. Bailey wrote:
It's the old "The razor's free but the blades cost money" philosophy
that made Gillette wealthy. You have to pay for the songs you
download to listen to with iTunes, but iTunes itself is free.
Eh? I have a ton of my own music I digitised mys
At 5:35 AM -0600 11/21/03, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
Darcy wrote,
The only oddity now is that the altos and tenors both have to share
an 8vb treble clef
placing tenors on an 8vb G clef did not used to be the norm; in the
past, tenors were noted on a treble clef, in alto range, and
transposed down
At 3:12 AM -0500 11/21/03, Darcy James Argue wrote:
Hi gang,
Okay, so I'm faced with a movement of a piece for orchestra + chorus
where only the men sing. The (highly unreliable) manuscript has the
men divided three ways and calls them "tenor, baritone, and bass" --
but I'm not sure if that's
At 12:39 PM -0500 11/21/03, Charles Small wrote:
Hello, I have hundreds of measures full of 16th notes, in 18/16
time sig. I'd like to convert all this to 16th-note triplets, in
3/4. No problem changing time sig and converting to tuplets one
tuplet at a time, BUT: is there a way to select a re
I was repeating what I had read, but I can't find my sources now, so I
should probably state in public that my comments come only from my
memory and I can't back them up and probably shouldn't have aired them,
excep that if it does screw up Winamp it would be good to be forewarned.
I would sugg
At 07:20 AM 11/23/03 -0500, David H. Bailey wrote:
>iTunes is free -- it'll screw up your installation of WinAmp
Are you sure about that? And how does it manifest itself? I'm always wary
of Apple software on the PC (I have 4 machines and QT has screwed up on
each one), but Winamp is a staple here.
iTunes is free -- it'll screw up your installation of WinAmp, if you
happen to use that currently, but it's free.
It's the old "The razor's free but the blades cost money" philosophy
that made Gillette wealthy. You have to pay for the songs you download
to listen to with iTunes, but iTunes its
At 3:43 am -0600 11/23/03, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
I wrote in part:
and for a few tens of dollars, one can purchase a file converter
which will convert the WAV to MP3 format, among others;
to which Darcy wrote:
iTunes does this for free. You can burn the CDs from there as well.
but I suspect i
I wrote in part:
and for a few tens of dollars, one can purchase a file converter which
will convert the WAV to MP3 format, among others;
to which Darcy wrote:
iTunes does this for free. You can burn the CDs from there as well.
but I suspect if one doesn't already have it, one must buy iTunes;
24 matches
Mail list logo
