On 11.12.2003 1:19 Uhr, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I know the quality isn't always as good, but I still listen regularly to
cassettes I recorded 25 to 30 years ago - they still sound okay. I recently
copied them all onto newer cassettes in case I tangled them up. (Come to think
of it, I have
I often wish to extract individual parts from a score. I have my own saved
templates for various combinations of instruments for use when I create a
score. But I can't see where I can specify in advance what the extracted
parts derived from that score should look like. So I end up having to edit
At 07:20 AM 12/11/2003, David Miles wrote:
But I can't see where I can specify in advance what the extracted
parts derived from that score should look like. So I end up having to edit
them individually for precise layout on the page. I am sure there must be
some way of specifying a template for
On 11.12.2003 14:09 Uhr, Aaron Sherber wrote
Ultimately, all of these settings are stored with the score file. So once
you find settings you like, what you should do is open your *score*
templates (Maestro Font Default.ftm, for example), make the needed changes,
and then resave the template.
At 10:31 AM 12/11/03 +0100, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 11.12.2003 1:19 Uhr, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I know the quality isn't always as good, but I still listen regularly to
cassettes I recorded 25 to 30 years ago - they still sound okay. I
recently
copied them all onto newer cassettes in case
Re last message, my tape restoration info and audio samples are here:
http://maltedmedia.com/mmrestoration.html
Dennis
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
David,
I'm not sure this is what you're looking for, but I've found it to be a helpful,
time-saving process when extracting parts.
Once I'm done with the score, I Save As that file to create a part template. I delete
every staff except the top one, which contains all of the textual instructions
At 02:08 PM 12/11/2003, Rob Deemer wrote:
I'm not sure this is what you're looking for, but I've found it to be a
helpful,
time-saving process when extracting parts.
Maybe I'm missing something in your description, but it seems like you're
taking an awful lot of time to essentially defeat most of
Aaron Sherber wrote:
[snip]
The only caveat to this is that you need to make sure all your
expressions
that you want
to be transferred from the score to the part are note expressions, or
else
they won't
show up in the part.
This is not true, and it's what makes me think you may be
Can Finale produce large format output for vision impaired singers?
TIA,
Doug
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Thanks for that Rob.I do a large volume of short to medium length pieces
with many being very 'layout specific'- eg marching band size, or A5 book
size. Fortunately I have the time to do the required tweaking- but by the
time I am onto the 39th of 40 different band parts I really am pd of
with
At 04:32 PM 12/11/2003, Doug Parker wrote:
Can Finale produce large format output for vision impaired singers?
Sure -- you can make the output as large as you want, and the paper can be
whatever size your printer supports.
Aaron.
___
Finale mailing
At 03:12 PM 12/11/2003, helgesen wrote:
Thanks for that Rob.I do a large volume of short to medium length pieces
with many being very 'layout specific'- eg marching band size, or A5 book
size. Fortunately I have the time to do the required tweaking- but by the
time I am onto the 39th of 40
Just got this in an email:
December 11, 2003
Dear Macintosh customer,
You have waited patiently for Finale 2004 and we need to ask you for just a
little more patience.
We have made tremendous progress over the past few weeks in readying Finale
2004 for Macintosh
Makes me wonder if they are going to make it as a company. Seriously,
missing 2 ship dates...
I could do without the soundfonts or whatever they are called. And the
making of audio CDs. I just want the program to run and do music and
MIDI in OS X.
I hope there is COAL in all the Makemusic
Twice in the past week I have encountered a bug in which Undo simply stops
working and the Undo list stops getting updated (I have the Undo Levels set
to Unlimited). Closing and reopening Finale sets things right, though one
time Finale crashed upon closing. I can't really correlate it to
I, as a user, would like to see them get OS X happening and MIDI. All
that other crap, the making of CDs, the sound playback stuff could wait.
Just OS X, and Midi and the other features (like the new expression
thing) working. I think some of the fluff is delaying it.
Brad Beyenhof
At 1:28 PM -0800 12/11/03, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
on 12/11/03 1:16 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Makes me wonder if they are going to make it as a company. Seriously,
missing 2 ship dates...
In their defense, they didn't give a hard and fast date of 12/15. They
said no earlier than, but of
On Thursday, December 11, 2003, at 01:58 PM, Linda Worsley wrote:
At 1:28 PM -0800 12/11/03, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
on 12/11/03 1:16 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Makes me wonder if they are going to make it as a company.
Seriously,
missing 2 ship dates...
In their defense, they didn't give a
My approach was to design my parts templates as seperate files first, then create libraries with those settings. When I'm ready to extract from the score, I save the file with a different name and load the library for the appropriate part template. Next, update page layout in page tool and the
I wonder what they will charge us for Finale 2005 in August?
Joel Sears
At 03:10 PM 12/11/2003, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
Just got this in an email:
December 11, 2003
Dear Macintosh customer,
You have waited patiently for Finale 2004 and we need to ask you for just a
Wait, you think that they could MAKE a shipping deadline?!?!?!
I think hell just froze over ;-)
Joel Sears wrote:
I wonder what they will charge us for Finale 2005 in August?
Joel Sears
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To those that have now had OS X 10.3 running for a while: how is it?
Is it everything you had hoped? What are the drawbacks (if you can
think of any)? Has anybody tried out the OS-level keyboard shortcut
feature? How QuicKeys-like is that? Are you still required to use the
command key in
I can't imagine that the soundfonts and save as audio would be the
holdup--it seems like that kind of thing is very easy in OS X. I
wonder if Panther somehow threw it off...? In any case, can there be
any doubt that this migration wasn't ever well planned?
Tim
On Dec 11, 2003, at 4:16 PM,
Doug Parker wrote:
Can Finale produce large format output for vision impaired singers?
Aaron Sherber responded:
Sure -- you can make the output as large as you want, and the paper
can be whatever size your printer supports.
and I would point out that in addition (though I've never used the
Brad,
10.3 is really nice. All of the apps have added touches that I keep
discovering. I really like the Finder improvements. Fast user
switching is really nice too. And it all looks considerably more
refined. It is already worth the price in dozens of ways, and I still
have much to
On Thursday, December 11, 2003, at 04:44 PM, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
To those that have now had OS X 10.3 running for a while: how is it?
Mostly excellent. I'm splitting my time between 10.2.8 and 10.3.1 right
now. The difference is substantial.
Is it everything you had hoped? What are the
I've noticed that OS X 10.3 is faster. Classic mode printing from Finale
2003a is a lot faster than under 10.2.8
I'd recommend going to 10.3 without hesitation (actually, we're up to
10.3.1 right now)..
Brad Beyenhof wrote:
To those that have now had OS X 10.3 running for a while: how
On Thursday, December 11, 2003, at 07:13 PM, Tim Thompson wrote:
Tip: You must type the command exactly as it appears in the
application menu, including ellipses and any other punctuation. (An
ellipsis is a special character that looks like three periods. To type
an ellipsis, you can use the
29 matches
Mail list logo
