I really wouldn't know without actually playing with it, but you might
consider cloning the system disk off to another hard drive and then
cloning it back. File fragmentation might be an issue, even though the
OS is supposed to be smart about that.
Sent from my iSomething
--
> On Mar 24, 2014, a
Eric -
After installation of Mavericks on my 2010 2.53 Ghz 4G RAM MacBook Pro, the OS
substantially slowed down. Ideas? I'll email off the list. You seem to know
about all this, so thought I'd ask.
Best!
Dean
--
Dean Rosenthal
www.deanrosenthal.org
> On Mar 23, 2014, at 2:32 PM, Eric Danne
On Mar 23, 2014, at 11:32 AM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> Best thing one should do upgrading from 10.6 is to do a complete new install
> on a new drive, and then use the migration assistant to transfer over your
> applications and stuff.
I wholeheartedly agree with Eric on this one, provided one'
No, 10.9.2 doesn't significantly slow down anything. In fact, things generally
seem a little snappier on my 2008 MacPro. I think some of that is due to the
memory compression.
Best thing one should do upgrading from 10.6 is to do a complete new install on
a new drive, and then use the migration
Expect your OS to significantly slow down on 10.9. But no problems with 2014.
Actually, a few crashes. I run it without any other apps.open, sometimes I need
the inst. manual going in Safari. I went from Snow Leopard.
Best!
Dean
--
Dean Rosenthal
www.deanrosenthal.org
> On Mar 23, 2014, at
On 2014-03-22 16:50, Mark McCarron wrote:
> I'm currently using Fin 2012 on a macpro. os 10.6.8 (snow leopard). My
> current set up is very stable.
> In order to upgrade to Fin 2014 I need to upgrade the OS. Should I go 10.7
> 10.8 or 10.9?
10.9.2 is the latest, and 10.9 is free and it should ha
I've been using both finale 12 and14 , Logic 9 (without your plugins) on osX
10.7 10.8 and now 10.9 . I had no problem with no one of this. I personally
prefered 10.8.
Hope you find this useful
--
Gippo Mercoli
www.clubgippo.com
> Il giorno 22/mar/2014, alle ore 16:50, Mark McCarron ha
I'm currently using Fin 2012 on a macpro. os 10.6.8 (snow leopard). My current
set up is very stable.
In order to upgrade to Fin 2014 I need to upgrade the OS. Should I go 10.7 10.8
or 10.9?
I also have Logic Pro 9 and DP 7 using mostly native plugins. with EZ drummer.
Mark McCarron
__
What's needed is a proper grid with options for what to show and sorting
with clickable headers. But one might as well wish for a flying car.
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Aaron Sherber wrote:
> On 12/29/2011 10:22 AM, Jari Williamsson wrote:
> > I would NOT want all the description texts cl
On 12/29/2011 10:22 AM, Jari Williamsson wrote:
> I would NOT want all the description texts clutter the grid view.
But it would be nice as an option, for those who prefer the old
single-column view with descriptions.
Aaron.
___
Finale mailing list
Fin
On 2011-12-29 16:12, Aaron Sherber wrote:
> On 12/28/2011 11:15 PM, Robert Patterson wrote:
>> I see the description text now that you've told me where to look, but it is
>> of limited value since it does not display in the grid.
>
> Yes, I agree.
I would NOT want all the description texts clutter
On 12/28/2011 11:15 PM, Robert Patterson wrote:
> Thanks Aaron. In my (limited) experience, the magnifiers affect only the
> cell size, not the % size of the content. (Boo.)
Well, if the content had been downsized to fit in the cell, the
magnifier will expand the content by making the cell bigger
Thanks Aaron. In my (limited) experience, the magnifiers affect only the
cell size, not the % size of the content. (Boo.)
I see the description text now that you've told me where to look, but it is
of limited value since it does not display in the grid. You have to know
what to select first. It wo
On 12/28/2011 9:14 PM, Robert Patterson wrote:
> Hello all. I have decided to upgrade to Fin12 from Fin08. What's the most
> intelligent way to go about converting my default settings?
I used to just open one of my old templates and save with the new
version, but for the past few years I have bow
Hello all. I have decided to upgrade to Fin12 from Fin08. What's the most
intelligent way to go about converting my default settings? I know this has
come up before, so if there is a website or a prior post, just point me
towards it.
Beyond that, is there any way to accomplish any of the following
Katherine Hoover wrote:
Dear finalelist,
I'm working on a fairly new mac with finale 2004.
1. Is it time to upgrade to 2011?
2. I have a score with 4 staves. Is it possible (for formatting) to
move a single staff up or down within a single system ?
1. Only you can answer if i
Dear finalelist,
I'm working on a fairly new mac with finale 2004.
1. Is it time to upgrade to 2011?
2. I have a score with 4 staves. Is it possible (for formatting) to
move a single staff up or down within a single system ?
Thanks,
Katherine Hoover
Thanks James ... I found the plugin and experimented with it. So far
I haven't gotten it to show the parenthesis, but the rest is pretty
much as you stated it.
Dean
On Jun 6, 2009, at 3:59 PM, James Gilbert wrote:
In the TG Tools plugin menu there is a 'create handbells used
plugin.' I'v
In the TG Tools plugin menu there is a 'create handbells used plugin.' I've
only ever played around with demo of Sibelius 6 and don't know what I'm
doing with Sibelius as well as Finale, but my impression is that I prefer
the Finale plugin, takes care of hiding the time signature, indenting right
s
Hmmm . well, I'm glad it finally worked for you ... after I call them
Monday, I'll post the results of my quest. Once I get it, THEN we'll
see what happens. One thing I'm curious about, which may be known by
some on the list ... I write quite a bit for Hand bell Choirs. The
last piece I d
On Jun 6, 2009, at 2:34 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:
Yeah, I had a problem too, it told me my credit card was not
accepted. I tried again and all was well. I got notice of shipping
today.
But I am ready to send it back if the new features don't work
Some work beautifully - the rehearsal
Yeah, I had a problem too, it told me my credit card was not
accepted. I tried again and all was well. I got notice of shipping
today.
But I am ready to send it back if the new features don't work and
they haven't addressed some of the stupider bugs. So far it looks
like the only big one
No problem here. Finale 2010 is on the way, and I've only paid once.
Raymond Horton
Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Well, I bit the bullet and ordered an upgrade to 2010. Something
really screwed up in the final ordering process, which noted there was
a failure of some kind ... bottom, line, my c
Well, I bit the bullet and ordered an upgrade to 2010. Something
really screwed up in the final ordering process, which noted there
was a failure of some kind ... bottom, line, my credit card got hit 3
times for the order, and as far as I can tell, not one of the three
orders actually were
Yes, David, I am indeed a SHE. My name is what happens when your parents
get creative because the boy they expected to name "_, Jr."
turns out to be a girl. :)
Thanks to all who chimed in. I decided to go with the upgrade to 2009,
mainly because of the new Aria Player (must hea
On 14 Jan 2009 at 12:39, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> You need to READ before posting. He has Finale 2007, not 2002.
Thurletta is a he? I assumed Thurletta is a SHE.
In any event, yes, I misremembered the details. Thurletta said that
s/he had upgraded to 2007 from 2002 with a previous "amnesty" upgr
You need to READ before posting. He has Finale 2007, not 2002.
I'd say if there is NO compelling new feature that you absolutely
cannot live without for the next 6 months or so, you should save the
money and wait for Finale 2010 (hope it isn't named that
but...whatever) which would have the featur
On 14 Jan 2009 at 8:16, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> Since MakeMusic generally updates their products in the summer time,
> and since that is about 6 months from nowyou'll be shelling
> out another $100 or so again real soon.
Er, what? Why would you think that someone who hasn't upgraded since
Wow, what a "deal"...not.
Since MakeMusic generally updates their products in the summer time,
and since that is about 6 months from nowyou'll be shelling
out another $100 or so again real soon.
I'd say wait unless you absolutely need some new feature Finale 2009 offers
On Wed, Jan 1
Hi Thurletta-
To get into the archives just click on the link on the bottom of this
email and sign in:
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
There is also another archive at :
http://www.opensubscriber.com/messages/finale@shsu.edu/topic.html
Hope this helps:)
Bob Morabito
On Jan
After getting an email with a marvelous $99.95 price for upgrading to
Finale Mac 2009, I'm considering taking the plunge. I know folks here have
discussed the problems they've had with 2009, but I'll confess I didn't
pay much attention since I didn't think I'd be upgrading. I currently use
According to MM support:
The $99.95 upgrade price from Finale 2008 to 2009 is good through
09/30/2008. After that it will return to the retail price of $119.95.
Thanks Bob
On Jul 25, 2008, at 11:13 AM, Bob Morabito wrote:
If you don't upgrade to FIn2009 now, does the price go up from $99?
If you don't upgrade to FIn2009 now, does the price go up from $99?
If so, when?
Thanks
Bob Morabito
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Yup. Two Macs and a PC.
On 1/13/08, Aaron Sherber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> At 01:27 PM 1/13/2008, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> >Yes. They need to drop the price. It is like $119 or something. I threw
> away
> >the flyer. So, since I have two licenses to upgrade, it would be $250 or
> so
> >(with
At 01:27 PM 1/13/2008, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
>Yes. They need to drop the price. It is like $119 or something. I threw away
>the flyer. So, since I have two licenses to upgrade, it would be $250 or so
>(with shipping and stuff).
Just curious: Two licenses? You run Finale on 4 machines?
>Now, if i
Yes. They need to drop the price. It is like $119 or something. I threw away
the flyer. So, since I have two licenses to upgrade, it would be $250 or so
(with shipping and stuff).
Now, if it was say $100 to do both, I might consider it. Otherwise, I might
just wait until the next version in a coupl
As well as strike fear in Sibelius users ;-)
On 1/13/08, dhbailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> > I still haven't upgraded to Finale 2008, but today in the mail I got a
> > little mailer from MakeMusic, and they are enticing the offer with the
> > inclusion of a FREE Final
Not Fair
mark
--- Aaron Sherber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 09:47 PM 1/12/2008, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
> >I still haven't upgraded to Finale 2008, but today
> in the mail I got a
> >little mailer from MakeMusic, and they are
> enticing the offer with the
> >inclusion of a FREE Finale T-Shir
Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 09:47 PM 1/12/2008, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
>I still haven't upgraded to Finale 2008, but today in the mail I got a
>little mailer from MakeMusic, and they are enticing the offer with the
>inclusion of a FREE Finale T-Shirt.
Not fair! We *early* adopters used to get th
Eric Dannewitz wrote:
I still haven't upgraded to Finale 2008, but today in the mail I got a
little mailer from MakeMusic, and they are enticing the offer with the
inclusion of a FREE Finale T-Shirt. Woohoo! I'm really tempted now!
Man, I wish I had waited!!! Wearing those t-shirts makes me bl
At 09:47 PM 1/12/2008, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
>I still haven't upgraded to Finale 2008, but today in the mail I got a
>little mailer from MakeMusic, and they are enticing the offer with the
>inclusion of a FREE Finale T-Shirt.
Not fair! We *early* adopters used to get the t-shirt! I don't think
I still haven't upgraded to Finale 2008, but today in the mail I got a
little mailer from MakeMusic, and they are enticing the offer with the
inclusion of a FREE Finale T-Shirt. Woohoo! I'm really tempted now!
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http:
On Feb 11, 2006, at 12:52 AM, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
Cecil Rigby wrote:
To that end I was hoping someone would take a minute to answer this:
If I install 06 in its own folder, away from all the previous
versions'
folders, should I have any of the problems that I've read some of you
had?
(f
Cecil Rigby wrote:
Hi David et al-
thanks for the reminder on plugins and the tip on the soundfonts.
since we can now point playback to any soundfont, without having to copy
it to the Component Files folder that we had to when they first included
soft-synth playback, getting playback with a so
Hi David et al-
thanks for the reminder on plugins and the tip on the soundfonts.
> since we can now point playback to any soundfont, without having to copy
> it to the Component Files folder that we had to when they first included
> soft-synth playback, getting playback with a soundfont is very e
Cecil Rigby wrote:
Hi everyone-
after waiting out upgrades since 2003b I finally will be taking Win06, but
*mostly* because I don't like having to ask people to send me music
submissions in the earlier format. I don't know that I'll actually use it
for engraving yet. That depends on how easily
Cecil Rigby wrote:
To that end I was hoping someone would take a minute to answer this:
If I install 06 in its own folder, away from all the previous versions'
folders, should I have any of the problems that I've read some of you had?
(files being overwitten, fonts not working, etc) Was this
Hi Cecil,
I am answering out of courtesy, not because I'm sure if this - you
need Darcy, or Brad, or one of the tech gurus for a definitive
answer, but my feeling is that you will be fine. 2006c is pretty
stable, and the installation issues were cured earlier. I haven't
heard anyone bri
Hi everyone-
after waiting out upgrades since 2003b I finally will be taking Win06, but
*mostly* because I don't like having to ask people to send me music
submissions in the earlier format. I don't know that I'll actually use it
for engraving yet. That depends on how easily it installs and behave
On Nov 16, 2005, at 1:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there: I originally wrote this the other day:
Though I cannot afford to do so yet, I am wondering about upgrading
from my version (FinMac 2000c) which won't even run in Classic but
requires I boot in OS9. I have a sense that the curre
Bill:
Did you look at this?
http://downloads.makemusic.com/forms/product_comparisons.pdf
Wade Kotter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/16/2005 11:07 am >>>
I will check out eBay for "semi-upgrades," but in poking around the
Finale site I think I am seeing more options than I remember,
Hi there: I originally wrote this the other day:
Though I cannot afford to do so yet, I am wondering about upgrading from my version (FinMac 2000c) which won't even run in Classic but requires I boot in OS9. I have a sense that the current version for Macintosh is rather buggy, and so I'd like t
On Jul 29, 2004, at 12:10 PM, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:00:50 -0700, Dean M. Estabrook
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks to you also, Richard. I think I found the annotation files,
and
dealt with them correctly. We'll see the next time I open 2k4c, and
see
what kind of, if an
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:00:50 -0700, Dean M. Estabrook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks to you also, Richard. I think I found the annotation files, and
> dealt with them correctly. We'll see the next time I open 2k4c, and see
> what kind of, if any, messages I see. I first time I forgot to clic
On Jul 29, 2004, at 12:32 AM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 29.07.2004 2:33 Uhr, Dean M. Estabrook wrote
Johannes
Ok. after much fumbling about (I'm really technologically
challanged, I got the file moved to the correct folder (called
2004b), and it opens ok. Then when I tried to use the User's
On Jul 28, 2004, at 5:55 PM, Richard Yates wrote:
Ok. after much fumbling about (I'm really technologically
challanged, I got the file moved to the correct folder (called
2004b), and it opens ok. Then when I tried to use the User's Manual,
I got the same kind of message, so I repeated the pro
On 29.07.2004 2:33 Uhr, Dean M. Estabrook wrote
>> Johannes
>> Ok. after much fumbling about (I'm really technologically
>> challanged, I got the file moved to the correct folder (called
>> 2004b), and it opens ok. Then when I tried to use the User's Manual,
>> I got the same kind of message
> > Ok. after much fumbling about (I'm really technologically
> > challanged, I got the file moved to the correct folder (called
> > 2004b), and it opens ok. Then when I tried to use the User's Manual,
> > I got the same kind of message, so I repeated the process, and got it
> > to work also.
On Jul 28, 2004, at 3:26 PM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 29.07.2004 0:12 Uhr, Dean M. Estabrook wrote
Yesterday I went to the Finale Site and downloaded 24k "c" (about 3
hours). Anyway, I tried to open a new file in Wizard today, and got
the message:
"Finale cannot start the Wizard because a neces
On Jul 28, 2004, at 3:26 PM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 29.07.2004 0:12 Uhr, Dean M. Estabrook wrote
Yesterday I went to the Finale Site and downloaded 24k "c" (about 3
hours). Anyway, I tried to open a new file in Wizard today, and got
the message:
"Finale cannot start the Wizard because a neces
On 29.07.2004 0:12 Uhr, Dean M. Estabrook wrote
> Yesterday I went to the Finale Site and downloaded 24k "c" (about 3
> hours). Anyway, I tried to open a new file in Wizard today, and got
> the message:
>
> "Finale cannot start the Wizard because a necessary data file
> (pagesizes.txt) couldn't
Yesterday I went to the Finale Site and downloaded 24k "c" (about 3
hours). Anyway, I tried to open a new file in Wizard today, and got
the message:
"Finale cannot start the Wizard because a necessary data file
(pagesizes.txt) couldn't be found in the Component files folder."
What do I do?
D
62 matches
Mail list logo
