Re: [Fink-devel] tcltk 8.4.15

Jack Howarth wrote: >I figured out the problem. We need to pass --disable-corefoundation to > configure for both tcl and tk in 8.4.15. The newer tcltk solved the problems > in pymol-py where the pdb selector would load a pdb and the tcl/tk interface > would become unresponsive. This doesn't occ

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink and Latest Leopard 10.5

Brent Austin wrote: > OK it workedI think? > > brent-austins-power-mac-g5:bin brentaustin$ ./pathsetup.sh > 2007-09-13 06:38:07.673 osascript[23593:10b] Error loading > /Library/QuickTime/LiveType.component/Contents/MacOS/LiveType: > dlopen(/Library/QuickTime/LiveType.component/Contents/Mac

Re: [Fink-devel] Problem with pidgin package on the tracker

Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > Alexander K. Hansen wrote: >> The validation error is as follows: >> >> Validating .deb dir root-pidgin-2.1.0-1... >> Error: File installed outside of allowable subdirectories of /sw >> Offending file: /sw/System/ >> Offending file: /sw/System/Library/ >

Re: [Fink-devel] graphicsmagick

Sven Schwyn wrote: > Hi folks > > I'm very new to Fink and need GraphicsMagick to work with TYPO3 on a > Mac. I've therefore converted the installation guide into an .info > for Fink. However, it's surely far from perfect I guess, so hints on > how to improve it are very much apprechiated, p

Re: [Fink-devel] Crashes with xmms 1.2.8

Djame Seddah wrote: > Hello, > I'm running tiger 10.4.10 and the fink install last updated a few ago > and whenever I launch > xmms > I got this message > > xmms > dyld: Library not loaded: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXxf86vm.1.dylib >Referenced from: /sw/bin/xmms >Reason: image not found > Trace/

Re: [Fink-devel] latest screen and /sw/etc/screenrc

William Scott wrote: [] > zsh-% /usr/bin/screen --version > Screen version 4.00.03 (FAU) 23-Oct-06 > > zsh-% /sw/bin/screen --version > Screen version 4.00.03 (FAU) 23-Oct-06 Why would anyone want to install Fink's screen? Is there a reason I have overlooked? -- Martin -

Re: [Fink-devel] Intel issue for a tracker package.

Martin Costabel wrote: [] > Concerning the issue of the semi-transparent cursor arrow, this may be a > problem of X servers rather than of build architecture: Turns out this is indeed the case. There is a well-known endian bug in the Xquartz server on Mac/intel which has been annoying

Re: [Fink-devel] Intel issue for a tracker package.

Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > If someone with an Intel box has time, I'd appreciate confirmation (or > not) of the issue raised on > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1756440&group_id=17203&atid=414256 There is a little hic: The build fails when trying --build-as-nobody

Re: [Fink-devel] Kaffeine

Pierre-Henri Lavigne wrote: > Good day all, > > I've just met a lead developer - hftom - from the Kaffeine devel team on IRC. > I guess Jack- already worked on it too. The typical error I got while > compiling Kaffeine seems to come from the VERSION defined in > kaffeine-0.8.5-patched/kaffeine/

Re: [Fink-devel] numpy package?

Jack Howarth wrote: > I noticed that Fedora 7 has now replaced the Numeric and Numarray > packages with the new Numpy package that supercedes them. Do we > have any plans on migrating our packages over to Numpy as well? Isn't this a question for the upstream developers? Once they make their sof

Re: [Fink-devel] -Wl,-framework (and others) with libusb

Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > I am currently making a package for libhid (http:// > libhid.alioth.debian.org/) which depends on libusb. The libusb build > flags are causing an error related to pkgconfig so I currently have a > kludge to work around this. > > > Here's the error: > > Valid

Re: [Fink-devel] [cvs] dists/10.4/unstable/main/finkinfo/devel make.info, 1.3, 1.4 make.patch, 1.2, 1.3

Max Horn wrote: > Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.4/unstable/main/finkinfo/devel > In directory sc8-pr-cvs17:/tmp/cvs-serv20994 > > Modified Files: > make.info make.patch > Log Message: > New revision of the GNU make package; hopefully will fix some compatibility > problems with certain p

Re: [Fink-devel] building mozilla-1.7.13-1114 failed on PPC 10.4

Martin Costabel wrote: [] > OTOH, the problem we are seeing comes from the backslash-newline > combination *in shell commands* in the Makefile where they are treated > differently. > > In this case, Apple's make, in agreement with its documentation in > > is doing t

Re: [Fink-devel] wxgtk-2.5.2.8-1005

Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > It shouldn't matter. Fink binaries are intended to be identical no > matter who builds them. > > And actually, the Source->Install command can fetch a binary instead, if > the binary version is the latest. And conversely, the command sudo apt-get install wxgtk=2.

Re: [Fink-devel] building mozilla-1.7.13-1114 failed on PPC 10.4

Daniel Macks wrote: > On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 02:26:13PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: >> Dominique Dhumieres wrote: >> [] >>> The origin of the problem seems obvious: missing space before \ in >>> >>> -DHAS_TMPL_RETENTION\ >>> >>> but

Re: [Fink-devel] building mozilla-1.7.13-1114 failed on PPC 10.4

Dominique Dhumieres wrote: [] > The origin of the problem seems obvious: missing space before \ in > > -DHAS_TMPL_RETENTION\ > > but I did not find how to fix it. Any idea? Try fink remove make -- Martin - This SF.ne

Re: [Fink-devel] Re : Failed: phase compiling: xpdf-3.02-1001 failed

Pierre-Henri Lavigne wrote: > Regards to what you say, does it mean the freetype219 package could be set to > replace freetype2 ? Freetype2 has a long tradition of incompatibility between different versions. Fink was therefore forced to keep simultaneously two versions of freetype2 around - in

Re: [Fink-devel] Failed: phase compiling: xpdf-3.02-1001 failed

Jean-François Mertens wrote: > On 22 Jul 2007, at 11:52, Pierre-Henri Lavigne wrote: > >> Good day, >> >> After this big update, every package seems ok except with xpdf : >> http://paste.lisp.org/display/44948 >> It seems I miss something. Thanks for your help, > I had to change the CXXFLAGS to

Re: [Fink-devel] fink needs a better cctools error message

Alexander Hansen wrote: [] > The error message that they're seeing is the standard one for whenever > there's a package version that exceeds those known to Fink. Rather > than code a special case just for cctools, Ben R. (rangerrick) > suggested it might be easier to add an "xcode" virtual package

Re: [Fink-devel] Re : Wx widgets conflicts ?

Pierre-Henri Lavigne wrote: [] > Validating package file > /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11/wxgtk.info... > Warning: File "%p/lib/libwx_gtk2d_ogl-2.5.2.dylib" is listed more than once > in field "shlibs" of "splitoff". (wxgtk.info) This is an obvious bug; I went ahead and fixed it in 10

Re: [Fink-devel] Error while installing ptex-base-3.1.9

Kevin Horton wrote: > On 7 Jul 2007, at 08:54, Alexander Hansen wrote: >> So I'd move tableaux.sty to %i/etc/texmf.local in the InstallScript >> and >> make sure that there's no %p/share/texmf-local remaining in the .deb . > > Thanks for catching that Alex. I'll submit a revised .info file to

Re: [Fink-devel] Problem updating pyqt-py2x

Jean-François Mertens wrote: > On 05 Jul 2007, at 00:10, Martin Costabel wrote: > >> fink builds pyqt-py24-3.17.2-1 almost OK for me (on a dual G5, OSX >> 10.4.10), up to the linker line for qt.so which fails with lots of >> undefined symbols. >> &g

Re: [Fink-devel] Problem updating pyqt-py2x

Jean-François Mertens wrote: > On 04 Jul 2007, at 03:49, Alexander Hansen wrote: > >> I managed to get sip-py24 updated, but now I'm stuck on pyqt-py24. >> >> My build log and package description files are linked here: >> >> http://akhmac.blogdns.net/~hansen/finklogs/archives/ >> 2007-07.html#e20

Re: [Fink-devel] Problem updating pyqt-py2x

Alexander Hansen wrote: > OS 10.4.10 > PowerPC (G4/867 single) > Xcode 2.4.1 > > I managed to get sip-py24 updated, but now I'm stuck on pyqt-py24. > > My build log and package description files are linked here: > > http://akhmac.blogdns.net/~hansen/finklogs/archives/2007-07.html#e2007-07-03T21

Re: [Fink-devel] [cvs] dists/10.4/unstable/main/finkinfo/text xmlto.info, 1.3, 1.4

Daniel Macks wrote: > Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.4/unstable/main/finkinfo/text > In directory sc8-pr-cvs17:/tmp/cvs-serv12472/10.4/unstable/main/finkinfo/text > > Modified Files: > xmlto.info > Log Message: > unmaintain per request of maintainer > Use unified text-browsers when availa

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink on WWDC Leopard

David R. Morrison wrote: [] > fink-0.24.3.tar.gz, released last Friday, is known to work. 0.27.3, perhaps? -- Martin - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 expres

Re: [Fink-devel] An option for packages that don't work with non-Apple X11

Benjamin Reed wrote: [] > I agree. If the package needs headers, it should be testing for them, > and use them. > > If you need to fix it temporarily, fix the code to have the right -I on > the compile-line without a test. > > Both are better than trying to fake up "system" headers apple probabl

Re: [Fink-devel] unstable ksudoku will not build

Neil Tiffin wrote: > For the past couple of weeks package ksudoku will not build. A month ago, I wrote: Don't bother. This version of the ksudoku package is thoroughly rotten. I don't think anyone has managed to build it. I am CCing the maintainer. If his email still doesn't work, I hope

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc4 package obsolete?

David R. Morrison wrote: > On Jun 4, 2007, at 1:44 PM, Remi Mommsen wrote: [] The only package depending on gcc4 is pdftk in 10.4/unstable (maintainer cc'd). [] > I guess one question is: has there ever been a package declaring a > dependency on the -shlibs part? Yes, pdftk. IIRC ther

Re: [Fink-devel] openmpi from tracker--feedback request

Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > The current build of openmpi from the tracker looked OK to me, but since > there are some library structure changes (with symlinks to maintain > compatibility) I wanted to solicit feedback from folks who use packages > that depend on it: > > https://sourceforge.net/

Re: [Fink-devel] openmpi 1.2 series

Jack Howarth wrote: [] > release. However the openmpi developers have > renamed the libopal.0.0.0.dylib and the > liborte.0.0.0.dylib share libraries as > libopen-pal.0.dylib and libopen-rte.0.dylib. >It appears that the release is supposed > to be backwardly compatible even with this > change

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-beginners] ksudoku does not compile

Alexander Lehmann wrote: > Chris Schram wrote: /sw/lib/qt3/include/qgl.h:79:20: error: GL/gl.h: No such file or directory /sw/lib/qt3/include/qgl.h:80:21: error: GL/glu.h: No such file or directory make[2]: *** [src/gui/views/CMakeFiles/ksudoku_views.dir/ksview.o] Error 1 make[1

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-beginners] In the deep stuff.

Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > Lorinc Del Motte wrote: [] Sorry, dpkg is already the newest version. 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 11 not upgraded. 1 packages not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used. >>

Re: [Fink-devel] [cvs] dists/10.4/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11-system tightvnc.info, 1.3, 1.4

Martin Costabel wrote: [] > jack wrote: [] >> Log Message: >> email changed > [] >> +<<<<<<< tightvnc.info >> +#SetCPPFLAGS: -no-cpp-precomp >> +=== >> +>>>>>>> 1.3 > > In any case, fink doesn't li

Re: [Fink-devel] [cvs] dists/10.4/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11-system tightvnc.info, 1.3, 1.4

Looks like you committed garbage ;-) jack wrote: > Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.4/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11-system > In directory sc8-pr-cvs17:/tmp/cvs-serv14579/unstable/main/finkinfo/x11-system > > Modified Files: > tightvnc.info > Log Message: > email changed [] > +<<< tightvnc

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-announce] Problems with tar

What's that crap message on the fink-announce list? A failed test of some sorts? No wonder that Sourceforge's spam filter sat on it for a whole week. It should have eliminated it. Hopefully next time it will. -- Martin Fink Project News wrote: > > Problems with tar >

Re: [Fink-devel] Shlibs field and variants

Benjamin Reed wrote: [] > a) ignore "private" shared libs that have no public API/headers In the case of root5, aren't all dylibs private, or is there another package depending on one of them? I would just scrap the whole shlibs splitoff stuff for this package. It isn't worth the hassle. -- Ma

Re: [Fink-devel] Surprised to find X11 dependency in wxmac

Alexander Hansen wrote: [] > My original idea was to come up with non-X11-using versions of all of > the dependencies, and for maxima, to reduce overhead for the user. > However, I found that there was a dependency on libgl-shlibs--provided > by x11-shlibs--in wxmac. I don't remember the previou

Re: [Fink-devel] Weird test failure in coreutils

Alexey Zakhlestin wrote: > Do you have the same filesystem type on all of your machines? Not completely. The machine where I observed this has /sw/src/fink.build inside a mounted disk image that is formatted with HFS+ case sensitive. I first thought that this was the problem, but then I ran the

[Fink-devel] Weird test failure in coreutils

Building the new coreutils fails on two of my machines in the test phase: PASS: printf-hex pwd-long: at depth 29: No space left on device FAIL: pwd-long The error message is bogus: Both machines have several GB free on the partition. Also the inode usage is at less than 60%. I can repeat the fa

Re: [Fink-devel] xmolwt-0.7-12

Marc Roussel wrote: [] > Seeing this now I feel a bit silly. I should have noticed that gmolwt was > installed. I didn't realize that different names were used for the > executable in different environments. I can of course use gmolwt, but it > would seem sensible to create a symbolic link to xmolw

Re: [Fink-devel] tetex and gnuplot

Daniel Macks wrote: > On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 10:27:10PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: [] >> I think it's a bug in the gnuplot package. It should install its >> gnuplot.cfg file into /sw/etc/texmf.local instead of >> /sw/share/texmf-local. A line like in the jadetex I

Re: [Fink-devel] tetex and gnuplot

Alexander K. Hansen wrote: > William Scott wrote: >> I'm getting this one one machine, whereas the identical (presumably) >> packages coexist on my others peacefully: >> >> Unpacking replacement tetex ... >> Unpacking tetex-base (from .../tetex-base_3.0-1002_darwin-i386.deb) ... >> Removing any l

Re: [Fink-devel] compilation of package maxima

Jean-François Mertens wrote: [] > The suggestion I made should work _ just > tried it : as is, I get the usual build, and substituting > "C" there by "fr" reproduces your error .. Here is another test that shows that this is indeed a clisp bug. This one can easily be tried by anybody, so maybe so

Re: [Fink-devel] compilation of package maxima

Pascal Gourdel wrote: [] > In fact, the error message was already present some months ago > with the 5.9.2 version, > and I sent a message to the previous maintainer (including the text of > the terminal, > but at this time he was believing that the problem was linked to intel) > What is surprisin

Re: [Fink-devel] compilation of package maxima

Alexander Hansen wrote: [] > What was the problem that you had? It's possible that whatever package > it was needs to be updated for Intel machines. The current maxima-5.11.0-2 builds and works perfectly on my intel machine; with clisp-2.41-1. IIRC, at the time when the alternative of using sb

Re: [Fink-devel] emboss-4.1.0-1 on a (new) intel iMac

Daniel E. Macks wrote: > Many of the function prototypes in /usr/include/crypt.h on my RedHat > box are in /usr/include/unistd.h on my OS X machine. I bet it's just the crypt() function in this case. This is in unistd.h, indeed, see man crypt. Anyway, the #include in question is conditional: #

Re: [Fink-devel] fsplit and ccp4

Jack Howarth wrote: [] > ps For some reason 'fink update-all' now seems to honor the > test. Strange. I would be interested to know if this test > fails for anyone else who has NAV 10 installed. I can't help with NAV, but here is a guess about a possible cause: The ccp4 package description has th

Re: [Fink-devel] New funny warning

Jesse Alama wrote: > Stan Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [] >> Same here, except it reports 266 days for me. > > For me it's 282. I am curious what stat /sw/fink/dists/stamp-cvs-live shows you. I myself don't see the problem any more; it goes away of you try to watch it too closely.

Re: [Fink-devel] New funny warning

Benjamin Reed wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Martin Costabel wrote: >> Running selfupdate and then update-all, I got (on 2 different machines) >> >> WARNING: your info file index has not been updated for 421 days. You >> sho

[Fink-devel] New funny warning

Running selfupdate and then update-all, I got (on 2 different machines) WARNING: your info file index has not been updated for 421 days. You should run 'fink selfupdate' to get the latest package descriptions. Someone can't count, it seems. -- Martin

[Fink-devel] ellipt2d-py25-1.8-1

This package installs its files directly into %p instead of %i, so that the deb contains only doc files. Try to build it with --build-as-nobody and you see how it crashes. The info file has CompileScript: << echo Skipping build << InstallScript: << #%p/bin/python%type_raw[python] setup.py i

Re: [Fink-devel] Help needed: Improving the Package Database (pdb)

Christian Schaffner wrote: [] > 1) > Help testing! Go to > > http://finch.finkproject.org/~chris01/fink_web/pdb/ > > and test anything you can think of. The bug that the pdb doesn't know about the "current" bindist is still present, it seems. Could this *please* be fixed? See bug tracker #1606

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with debugging mysterious tar error

Koen van der Drift wrote: > Yes: > > ... > Writing control file... > Writing package script postinst... > Writing package script prerm... > dpkg-deb -b root-gcc42-4.1.-20070221 /sw/fink/10.4/unstable/main/ > binary-darwin-powerpc/languages > dpkg-deb: building package `gcc42' in `/sw/fink/10.

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with debugging mysterious tar error

Koen van der Drift wrote: > No problems with gcc42. Did you still see "file changed as we read it"? With the patched version, it should still show up, only as a warning, not an error. -- Martin - Take Surveys. Earn Cash

Re: [Fink-devel] tar and dpkg

David R. Morrison wrote: [] > Anyway, my conclusion from all of this is that the two-exit-code > status of tar is here to stay, at least for now. And while Apple is > currently using tar-1.15.x, we have no control over when they might > change to tar-1.16.x. Thus, switching to /usr/bin/tar

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with debugging mysterious tar error

Charles Lepple wrote: > On 3/3/07, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Charles Lepple wrote: >> > Martin, >> > >> > I'd be curious to see how far those ctimes are from the current >> > time(). Can you post your patch? >> >

Re: [Fink-devel] Help with debugging mysterious tar error

Charles Lepple wrote: > Martin, > > I'd be curious to see how far those ctimes are from the current > time(). Can you post your patch? They are just printed out with format %i. To get the real time, you can run these numbers through "/bin/date -r": % /bin/date -r 1172946146 Sat Mar 3 19:22:26

[Fink-devel] Help with debugging mysterious tar error

Could those of you who have or had the dpkg-deb failure caused by tar-1.16.1 claiming "file changed as we read it" please help with debugging this? Based on the outcome of these tests, we should be able to decide whether we need to patch tar or dpkg, or whether we need to dig further down.

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc42 O0g.gch: file changed as we read it (again)

Jean-François Mertens wrote: [] > (I would bet rather on the ctime than on the size _ which looks > to me as an almost redundant test _, but evidence for that > will disappear after your patch .. (sigh) ) I wonder why none of the people who are having this problem really tried to get to the bot

Re: [Fink-devel] libart2-2.3.18 chokes on C++

Daniel Macks wrote: [] > Fixed in fink (along with quick version), and filed upstream. Thanks a lot. I am curious if they'll wake up enough to fix this... -- Martin - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join

Re: [Fink-devel] libart2-2.3.18 chokes on C++

Benjamin Reed wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Martin Costabel wrote: > >> need to be enclosed in 'extern "C"', just like the later declarations of >> art_die() etc are. >> >> If someone has contact to the

[Fink-devel] libart2-2.3.18 chokes on C++

Daniel Macks wrote: > Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.4/unstable/main/finkinfo/gnome > In directory > sc8-pr-cvs5.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv18479/10.4/unstable/main/finkinfo/gnome > > Modified Files: > libart2.info > Removed Files: > libart2.patch > Log Message: > New version; r

Re: [Fink-devel] master.us.finkmirrors.net down?

Benjamin Reed wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Martin Costabel wrote: > >> Still no joy. What I get now is the following >> >> % rsync rsync://master.us.finkmirrors.net/finkinfo/ >> rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 byt

Re: [Fink-devel] master.us.finkmirrors.net down?

Benjamin Reed wrote: [] > If you try now, does it work? Yes. -- Martin - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & busi

Re: [Fink-devel] master.us.finkmirrors.net down?

Benjamin Reed wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Martin Costabel wrote: > >> % rsync rsync://master.us.finkmirrors.net/finkinfo/TIMESTAMP >> -rw-r--r-- 11 2007/02/20 23:07:59 TIMESTAMP > > This should be fixed. I think when w

Re: [Fink-devel] master.us.finkmirrors.net down?

Benjamin Reed wrote: > should be fixed now, I think... let me know if you still see problems One problem is that master.us.finkmirrors.net doesn't update any more. It stopped, in fact, two hours before you wrote your message: % rsync rsync://master.us.finkmirrors.net/finkinfo/TIMESTAMP -rw-r--r

Re: [Fink-devel] cwp-su, coreutils, and modglue

Kurt Schwehr wrote: > I think that sounds like a spectacular solution. > cwp-su has been driving me crazy for a long time now. > That could really be a good solution. Would that > be okay in terms of fink policy? There are a couple of packages that do this kind of thing. In the sci section

Re: [Fink-devel] cwp-su, coreutils, and modglue

Martin Costabel wrote: [] > Wouldn't it be simpler to leave the safely in /sw/lib/cwp-su/bin where > they are now, but instead of making symlinks in /sw/bin, place a script > in /sw/etc/profile.d that prepends /sw/lib/cwp-su to PATH? Oops. Let me try this again: Wouldn't it

Re: [Fink-devel] packaging request

Kasper Peeters wrote: > The current modglue-1.6 and cadabra-0.100 should resolve any remaining > issues on the mac. The dependence on libexpect is gone (so you don't > need tcl anymore) and it should compile fine both on 10.3.x and 10.4.x > (i.e. it takes care of the nested functions problem report

Re: [Fink-devel] cwp-su, coreutils, and modglue

Robert T Wyatt wrote: > FYI to the various maintainers: > > While installing cwp-su (from the 10.4-unstable tree) dpkg complains > about: > trying to overwrite '/sw/bin/grm', which is also in package coreutils > and > trying to overwrite '/sw/bin/isatty', which is also in package modglue > > You

Re: [Fink-devel] PDB tweaks

Charles Lepple wrote: > On 2/18/07, Martin Costabel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> If I ask a question that has 7000 packages as an answer, I want to see >> them. If I want to see less, I ask a different question. > > Makes sense, as long as you get to ask the question b

Re: [Fink-devel] PDB tweaks

Max Horn wrote: [] >>> Just had another idea: We should consider limiting the number of >>> packages displayed on a page. After all, listing 7000 packages >>> generates a fairly big page, which is slow to load. Instead, how >>> about restricting to 100 pkgs per page or something like that?. >> Havi

Re: [Fink-devel] packaging request

Pierre-Henri Lavigne wrote: > Ok sorry to be late :( To resume Martin did the work. Hmm, not really :-) I made packages for lie and modglue, but not for cadabra. Cadabra will need some more serious work for which I won't have time, in particular if you want to build the gui part. -- Martin

Re: [Fink-devel] packaging request

Kasper Peeters wrote: >> As dmacks points out, there is one problem with the modglue package: The >> compatibility_version of the dylibs is 0.0.0. > > I have made an updated version which is now using -version-info > instead of -release. It's available at > > http://www.aei.mpg.de/~peekas/modg

Re: [Fink-devel] why is our dpkg so old?

Jack Howarth wrote: >I am getting swamped with reports from users about gcc42 installation > problems due to the new tar in unstable. Out of these many reports, were you able to extract a situation where these problems are reproducible? I suspect if we had a reproducible error, it would be

Re: [Fink-devel] packaging request

balaurici daici wrote: > Anyone can add KTorrent 2.1 final to fink? Could you please use the package request tracker (linked from the Fink home page)? This thread, despite its general subject, is about a specific request to help with packaging cadabra. -- Martin --

Re: [Fink-devel] packaging request

Martin Costabel wrote: > Kevin Horton wrote: > [] >> Please confirm that your lie and modglue packages will be added to >> fink sometime in the near future. For now we will use the ones from >> your exp directory. > > There is no real obstacle to adding

Re: [Fink-devel] packaging request

Matthias Neeracher wrote: [] > Thanks for the heads up. I've now updated to 5.43. libexpect is fairly > small. Is there really much of a point in building shared libs for it? Thanks. Generalizing from the one example I have seen ;-) I would say it is perhaps not very necessary. By default, the

[Fink-devel] Broken links on wiki Re: [Fink-users] Failed: phase compiling: lablgtk2-2.6.0-1 failed

Sebastian Flothow wrote: > Hi, > > did you ever solve this? I'm getting the very same error with > lablgtk2-2.6.0-4; Mac OS X 10.3.9, gcc 3.3. FWIW lablgtk is also listed > as broken on > http://wiki.finkproject.org/index.php/Fink:Packaging:breakage . Looking at that page, I see links pointing

Re: [Fink-devel] packaging request

Kevin Horton wrote: [] > Please confirm that your lie and modglue packages will be added to > fink sometime in the near future. For now we will use the ones from > your exp directory. There is no real obstacle to adding them, except that I have done virtually no tests. Just confirm that they

Re: [Fink-devel] packaging request

Alexander Hansen wrote: > On 1/24/07, Kasper Peeters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> If it can be built from scratch on OS X, then that's a great start! >> My main problem is that I don't have access to a Mac. So I am looking >> for someone with a Mac who can help me do the packaging. >> >> Best, >>

Re: [Fink-devel] tar/spotlight (was Re: gcc42 mixed result)

David R. Morrison wrote: [] > dpkg-deb -b root-gcc42-4.1.-20070124 > /sw/fink/10.4/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386/languages > dpkg-deb: building package `gcc42' in > `/sw/fink/10.4/unstable/main/binary-darwin-i386/languages/ > gcc42_4.1.-20070124_darwin-i386.deb'. > tar: > ./sw/lib/gcc4.

Re: [Fink-devel] gcc42 mixed result

David Fang wrote: [] > Perhaps something about Spotlight disabling could be added to the > FAQ? It makes a somewhat noticeable improvement on slow machines. I'd > recommend disabling for at least the src/fink.build directories. Spotlight does not touch *.build directories. That's why fink.

Re: [Fink-devel] [cvs] fink ChangeLog, 1.453, 1.454 bootstrap, 1.9, 1.10

Benjamin Reed wrote: > Update of /cvsroot/fink/fink > In directory sc8-pr-cvs5.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv15529 > > Modified Files: > ChangeLog bootstrap > Log Message: > 10.4.9 will mess things up for us... yay sudo :P Just a small memory update (I saw in IRC log that everybody seems t

Re: [Fink-devel] [PATCH] make fink commander provide default feedback

Brendan Cully wrote: > Hi all, > > Here's a patch to fink commander to make it indicate positive or > negative feedback from the feedback buttons. I have updated my finkcommander package in exp to include this patch so that this can be more generally tested. -- Martin --

Re: [Fink-devel] future pymol-py problems

Max Horn wrote: > Am 20.01.2007 um 17:53 schrieb Jack Howarth: [] >> What is the recommended form for the Source line when >> the source tarball only exists within the fink mirror >> system? > > Unless somethign dramatic changed while I wasn't watching (which is > easily possible, considering I

Re: [Fink-devel] Why no frameworks?

Timothy Reaves wrote: > Is there any plans of trying to incorporate framework based builds into > Fink distributed apps? There would be so much benefit from it. Is it > just the work that'd be required that prevents it? Has the idea been > discussed before? The idea has been discussed

Re: [Fink-devel] Fwd: Fink-devel post from [EMAIL PROTECTED] requires approval

Robert Thacker wrote: > Here's the output: > > [ZORAC:~] thacker% dpkg -S include/malloc.h > dpkg: *include/malloc.h* not found. So it wasn't installed by a Fink package. That's OK then. -- Martin - Take Surveys. Earn Ca

Re: [Fink-devel] Fwd: Fink-devel post from [EMAIL PROTECTED] requires approval

Robert Thacker wrote: > What I removed was a blank file in /sw/include. Is this likely to break > anything else? No, but it would be interesting to know where it came from. It should never have been there. Do you get anything from the command dpkg -S include/malloc.h ? -- Martin

Re: [Fink-devel] Fwd: Fink-devel post from [EMAIL PROTECTED] requires approval

Alexander Hansen wrote: [] > You're not supposed to have a malloc.h on OS X. Find it and move it out > of the way. This formulation is perhaps a little too terse and could lead to misunderstandings. There are lots of malloc.h on OSX, like /System/Library/Frameworks/Kernel.framework/Versions/A/

Re: [Fink-devel] gnucash-1.8.12-11

damien lock wrote: > this does not work on my mac. > crashes on startup (Bus error) > -- > Package manager version: 0.26.0 > Distribution version: 0.8.1.cvs i386 > Mac OS X version: 10.4.8 > Xcode version: 2.3 > gcc version: 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5341) > make version: 3.80 > Feedback Co

Re: [Fink-devel] new package help: kodos

Robert T Wyatt wrote: [] > Can't exec "./configure": No such file or directory at > /sw/lib/perl5/Fink/Services.pm line 584, line 1. [see below] This thing is a python module. No configure or make involved. You want to have a look at other "*-py" packages to see how they are compiled. Hint: If

Re: [Fink-devel] Info3?

Michèle Garoche wrote: > Sorry if my question seems to be trivial. I need an answer first for my > own understanding, second for correct translation. I second your request for explanation. I don't understand the formulations either. And what I seem to understand doesn't immediately make sense t

Re: [Fink-devel] tightvnc-1.2.3-10

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have an issue installing tightvnc-1.2.3-10 through fink, seems like an > architecture issue. > > My machine: > > Darwin athena.nyc 8.8.1 Darwin Kernel Version 8.8.1: Mon Sep 25 19:42:00 > PDT 2006; root:xnu-792.13.8.obj~1/RELEASE_I386 i386 i386 > > MacBook Pro/ Intel

Re: [Fink-devel] Please use tetex3-base instead of tetex-base (>= 3.0-1)

Michèle Garoche wrote: [] > The only evidence I have for it is that it worked perfectly two days > before the changes, then did not work one day after it. So certainly > related to this change, given that I have not updated during this time. Is this the same error as seen by others: etex -in

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink errors out after "cvs up" in /sw/fink (problem scanning gmp.info)

Benjamin Reed wrote: [] > http://www.trilug.org/~ranger/irc_logs/public/fink-2006-12-21.log > > Search for "Fingolfin" OK, so it boils down to whether the following is true or not: 14:25 < dmacks> drm: Ayup...fink (at least older versions, dunno currently) scans ConfigureParams during indexing.

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink errors out after "cvs up" in /sw/fink (problem scanning gmp.info)

Max Horn wrote: > Am 22.12.2006 um 07:52 schrieb Martin Costabel: > >> Max Horn wrote: >>> For some reasons I didn't update my Fink installation for some time. >>> So today I run a "cvs up" in /sw/fink, then sudo fink list -o >>> >>&

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink errors out after "cvs up" in /sw/fink (problem scanning gmp.info)

Max Horn wrote: > For some reasons I didn't update my Fink installation for some time. > So today I run a "cvs up" in /sw/fink, then sudo fink list -o > > This resulted in the following error: > > Failed: Error performing percent expansion: unknown % expansion or I don't think running older

Re: [Fink-devel] echo -n now deprecated

David R.Morrison wrote: > As mentioned on the new "preparing for 10.5" page on the fink wiki, > echo -n is now deprecated in fink. I have edited the vast majority > of packages where this occurs to conform to the new version. Instead of > >echo -n "string" > > one should now write > >

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >