Re: [Fink-devel] texlive_0.20140523-2

2015-04-17 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
" So, sudo keeps the env variables. Maybe Fink resets the env variables on 10.10, but not on 10.9 (of my machine). Tomoaki Okayama 2015-04-17 0:34 GMT+09:00 Alexander Hansen : > >> On Apr 16, 2015, at 05:46, Tomoaki Okayama >> wrote: >> >> OMG, "make -k c

Re: [Fink-devel] texlive_0.20140523-2

2015-04-16 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
perl -pi seems to work fine, so I've just committed the new texlive.info. But still I'm wondering why the environment variable is not unset in my env... Tomoaki Okayama 2015-04-15 21:18 GMT+09:00 Jack Howarth : > What happens if you substitute a perl edit for the sed edit? >

Re: [Fink-devel] texlive_0.20140523-2

2015-04-16 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
OMG, "make -k check" failed when LANG is set. Grr test-suite.log says "sed: RE error: illegal byte sequence". Hum..., I added "unset LANG" in the TestScript. I hope this bug (the environment variables are not unset when building) will be fixed... Tomoaki Okayam

Re: [Fink-devel] texlive_0.20140523-2

2015-04-14 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
e2009.diff manually, I get the error ``sed: RE error: illegal byte sequence'' on both 10.9 and 10.10 with LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8. So, only the difference is the environment variable, unset or not unset in Fink. Tomoaki Okayama 2015-04-15 10:25 GMT+09:00 Alexander Hansen : > > > On Ap

Re: [Fink-devel] texlive_0.20140523-2

2015-04-14 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
LUDES)|\$(FREETYPE2_INCLUDES) \$(common_includes)|g' \ > xdvik-20090903-texlive2009.diff sed: RE error: illegal byte sequence ### execution of /tmp/fink.4SC75 failed, exit code 1 ### execution of /tmp/fink._3Ky1 failed, exit code 1 Tomoaki Okayama 2015-04-14 23:06 GMT+09:00 Jack Howarth : >

Re: [Fink-devel] texlive_0.20140523-2

2015-04-14 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
version: selfupdate-rsync Mon Apr 13 09:55:22 2015, 10.10, x86_64 Trees: local/main stable/main local/injected No recognized Xcode.app installed Xcode command-line tools: 6.2.0.0.1.1424975374 Max. Fink build jobs: 24 Thanks for your help. Tomoaki Okayama 2015-04-13 19:39 GMT+09:00 Tomoaki Okayama

Re: [Fink-devel] texlive_0.20140523-2

2015-04-13 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
ot; before sed seems to work. (Personally I used LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8) However, on 10.10 and 10.8, the build proceeds without the workaround, even if LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 is set. Does anybody know why? Tomoaki Okayama 2015-04-13 5:45 GMT+09:00 Jack Howarth : > Tomoaki, > The texlive package ne

Re: [Fink-devel] system header leakage in texlive

2015-01-26 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
Thanks for merging the patch for 10.7. Seems proper. On the build failure when flag-sort: I'm not sure how to fix unfortunately. If you find a workaround, please let me know. Tomoaki Okayama 2015-01-26 8:24 GMT+09:00 Jack Howarth : > I suspect that the breakage of the texlive bu

Re: [Fink-devel] TeXLive has corrupt deb?

2015-01-20 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
Sorry, I use 10.9, and the texlive-texmf deb is still broken. http://bindist.finkmirrors.net/10.9/dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-x86_64/text/texlive-texmf_0.20140525-1_darwin-x86_64.deb should be 930 MB or so, but currently only 2.8 MB. Could anybody fix the broken deb please? Tomoaki Okayama

Re: [Fink-devel] TeXLive has corrupt deb?

2015-01-17 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
I use 10.8, and the official deb is still broken. Its size is only 2924kb. Tomoaki Okayama 2015-01-17 8:56 GMT+09:00 Alexander Hansen : > >> On Jan 16, 2015, at 3:54 PM, Scott Hannahs >> wrote: >> >> On Jan 15, 2015, at 19:31, Tomoaki Okayama >> wrote: >&g

Re: [Fink-devel] TeXLive has corrupt deb?

2015-01-15 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
Could anybody fix the broken deb of texlive-texmf please? As long as it remains broken, all other debs of texlive-related packages will not be built in the env. Tomoaki Okayama 2015-01-13 3:49 GMT+09:00 Alexander Hansen : > > On Jan 12, 2015, at 10:18 AM, Scott Hannahs > wrote: > &g

Re: [Fink-devel] TeX Live updater

2014-12-30 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
ox-]base-0.20140523-0beta4, please once remove the version and try again. Tomoaki Okayama 2014-12-31 9:27 GMT+09:00 Hanspeter Niederstrasser : > On 10.9, the new texlive built fine. Just three packaging things I can > think of since I don't use TeX: > > Minor Depends: fix: > *

[Fink-devel] TeX Live updater

2014-12-29 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
for your cooperation. Tomoaki Okayama -- Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel softw

Re: [Fink-devel] new p7zip version

2012-05-17 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
Hi, thanks for your contribution. Go ahead please, and you can take over the maintainer if you like. Tomoaki Okayama At Thu, 17 May 2012 08:35:36 -0700, Alexander Hansen wrote: > > Hi. > > I've come up with packaging for the newest p7zip release (attached). It > appears to

Re: [Fink-devel] libkpathsea6-6.0.0-1 (or -100) fails deb validation on 10.6/* and 10.7

2012-02-05 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
Thanks for the report. I know the bug, and it should be already fixed in experimental/todai. Could you test it please? (That bug is caused by the recent change related to xz unpacking.) Tomoaki Okayama At Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:09:46 -0500, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > > Trying to

Re: [Fink-devel] [tutors-dev:05359] libkpathsea6-6.0.0-1 (or -100) fails deb validation on 10.6/* and 10.7

2012-02-05 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
Thanks for the report. I know the bug, and it should be already fixed in experimental/todai. Could you test it please? (That bug is caused by the recent change related to xz unpacking.) Tomoaki Okayama At Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:09:46 -0500, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > > Trying to

Re: [Fink-devel] [cvs] dists/10.4/unstable/main/finkinfo/text eptex.info, 1.1, 1.2 libkpathsea6.info, 1.1, 1.2 ptexenc1.info, 1.1, 1.2 texlive-texmf.info, 1.6, 1.7 texlive.info, 1.9, 1.10

2012-02-03 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
in reality, because the name of the directry is already tl11 in the original tarball. The line above is dummy. Hope this helps. Tomoaki Okayama At Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:25:29 -0500, Alexander Hansen wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 2/3/12 6:06

Re: [Fink-devel] [cvs] dists/10.4/unstable/main/finkinfo/text eptex.info, 1.1, 1.2 libkpathsea6.info, 1.1, 1.2 ptexenc1.info, 1.1, 1.2 texlive-texmf.info, 1.6, 1.7 texlive.info, 1.9, 1.10

2012-02-03 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
xvf above. Is this a bug? Tomoaki Okayama At Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:11:20 -0500, Alexander Hansen wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 1/25/12 8:55 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: > > Update of /cvsroot/fink/dists/10.4/unstable/main/finkinfo/text &g

Re: [Fink-devel] Fink's imagemagick2-svg and avahi

2012-02-03 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
from Depends and Builddepends. Thanks for your report. Tomoaki Okayama At Sat, 28 Jan 2012 15:39:35 -0500, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > > Hi, > > I was building imagemagick2 on Lion and saw that it was pulling in avahi > and a bunch of gnome deps. These all seem t

[Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2011

2012-01-09 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
other env. * LuaTeX-related commands work good? Original luatex needs poppler4 >= 0.12, but now it's not available in Fink. Therefore I created quick backport-patches to build with poppler4-0.10 in Fink. I worry whether it works good or not. Thank you for your cooperation. Tomoaki Okayama

Re: [Fink-devel] texlive-base install failure on 10.7

2011-11-24 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
I believe the error is due to > /Users/smaret/Library/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf which may be outdated. If you think that file is not needed, please do: $ mv /Users/smaret/Library/texmf/web2c/fmtutil.cnf{,.old} then re-run "fink reinstall texlive-base". Tomoaki Okayama At Thu, 2

Re: [Fink-devel] texlive-base install failure on 10.7

2011-11-24 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
Hmm, strange. Please let us know the result: $ which kpsewhich and $ kpsewhich -all fmtutil.cnf Tomoaki Okayama At Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:31:08 +0100, Sébastien Maret wrote: > > > Le Nov 23, 2011 à 4:45 PM, Tomoaki Okayama a écrit : > > > The whole install log should be help

Re: [Fink-devel] texlive-base install failure on 10.7

2011-11-23 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
/metafun.log may be helpful. Please let us see the logs. Tomoaki Okayama At Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:28:34 +0100, Sébastien Maret wrote: > > Hi all, > > I get the following error when installing texlive-base-0.20100722-100 on 10.7: > > (�) > fmtutil: /sw/var/lib/texmf/web2c/xetex/

Re: [Fink-devel] mftrace vs texlive: libkpathsea4 or 6 ?

2011-03-29 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
't think libkpathsea4 should replace texlive-base. (but if it's indispensable for something I'm ok) 3. [texlive-base] Added Replaces: libkpathsea4 just in case. (already done) Tomoaki Okayama At Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:02:01 -0400, Alexander hansen wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED M

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] Update TeX Live

2011-02-08 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
[1] $ Sometimes old ~/.texmf-var or ~/.texmf-config cause some problems, so if you have such a directory, please try to rename it. (maybe unrelated though ...) Tomoaki Okayama At Wed, 9 Feb 2011 01:06:51 -0500, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > Hi, > > At 10:57 +0900 on 2011-2-9 Tomoaki

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] Update TeX Live

2011-02-08 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
17203 was very useful to investigate the dvips segfault problem. Tomoaki Okayama At Tue, 8 Feb 2011 19:16:18 -0500, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > Hi, > > Thank you first of all for the quick response. > > At 21:54 +0900 on 2011-2-8 Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > > > > I&#x

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] Update TeX Live

2011-02-08 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
I've reported the problem to Mr. Kakuto (patch developer), and he has just updated the patch: http://w32tex.org/generic/dvipsk-TL2010-fix.diff which seems to fix the problem in 64bit. I will update finkinfo when Fink cvs repository comes back. Tomoaki Okayama At Tue, 08 Feb 2011 19:19:40

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] Update TeX Live

2011-02-08 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
s the cvs repository currently, but I will commit the change when available. FYI: dvipsk-TL2010-fix.diff includes the current TeX Live's sources, so it may a bug in upstream. At Mon, 07 Feb 2011 10:14:52 +0900, Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > > Hi, > > Sorry for your inconvenience. > &g

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] Update TeX Live

2011-02-06 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
Currently we don't still have any remedy for this issue. If pdflatex or dvipdfmx can make a normal pdf file, please use it instead of dvips. If you find a way to fix it, please let us know. Tomoaki Okayama At Sun, 6 Feb 2011 19:29:19 -0500, Stefan Bruda wrote: > > Hi, > > Havi

Re: [Fink-devel] Update TeX Live

2011-01-24 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
At Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:33:44 -0600, Robert T Wyatt wrote: > > Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > > At Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:10:43 -0500, > > Alexander Hansen wrote: > >> > >> If you have just "A Replaces B", that means that files from A can > >> au

Re: [Fink-devel] Update TeX Live

2011-01-24 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
#x27;d like to move kpathsea binaries (kpseaccess, kpsepath, ...) from texlive-base to the package "kpathsea", as splitoff in libkpathsea6.info. But if I do so, new "kpathsea" and previous texlive-base have the same binaries, and

Re: [Fink-devel] Update TeX Live

2011-01-24 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
At Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:21:50 -0500, =?utf-8?b?RGFuaWVsIE1hY2tz?= wrote: > > On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 13:57:37 0900, Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > At Sat, 22 Jan 2011 17:27:00 -0500, > > =?utf-8?b?RGFuaWVsIE1hY2tz?= wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 22:58

Re: [Fink-devel] Update TeX Live

2011-01-22 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
At Sat, 22 Jan 2011 17:27:00 -0500, =?utf-8?b?RGFuaWVsIE1hY2tz?= wrote: > > On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 22:58:39 0900, Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > Dear Fink users/developers, > > > > The texlive package in unstable has just been updated to > > TeX Live 2010. Many thanks t

[Fink-devel] Update TeX Live

2011-01-22 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
rom tetex to texlive can be found at http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel/18433 . [New features] In the current version, some packages are newly included, such as detex, xetex, ptex, dvipdfmx, jadetex, pdfjam. You don't need to install these pac

Re: [Fink-devel] [Bulk] Re: Updater to TeX Live 2010

2011-01-16 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
At Sun, 16 Jan 2011 14:50:19 -0500, Alexander Hansen wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 1/16/11 2:45 PM, Kevin Horton wrote: > > On 11-01-16 12:46 PM, Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > >> At Sun, 16 Jan 2011 11:35:36 -0500, > >> Kevi

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

2011-01-16 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
At Sun, 16 Jan 2011 11:35:36 -0500, Kevin Horton wrote: > > On 2011-01-16, at 04:59 , Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > > > Unfortunately I found that texlive-base (<= 0.20080816-3) > > conflicts with new texlive-texmf (>= 0.20100722-0), and > > for this reas

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

2011-01-16 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
Unfortunately I found that texlive-base (<= 0.20080816-3) conflicts with new texlive-texmf (>= 0.20100722-0), and for this reason "fink update-all" doesn't work. One way to update from the previous (2008) version is: $ fink build texlive-texmf $ fink build texlive $ sudo apt-get install texlive-t

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

2011-01-14 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
At Fri, 14 Jan 2011 23:48:36 +0100, Martin Costabel wrote: > > On 14/01/11 09:32 , Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > > I imported a patch from MacPorts, which disables Carbon API. > > https://trac.macports.org/ticket/25316 > > > > How does it work for you? > > In

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

2011-01-14 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
I imported a patch from MacPorts, which disables Carbon API. https://trac.macports.org/ticket/25316 How does it work for you? Tomoaki Okayama At Fri, 14 Jan 2011 02:27:20 +0100, Martin Costabel wrote: > > On 11/01/11 20:26 , Martin Costabel wrote: > [] > > I'll go now ba

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

2011-01-11 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
At Tue, 11 Jan 2011 20:26:59 +0100, Martin Costabel wrote: > > On 11/01/11 19:50 , Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > [] > > FYI, I always succeed to build texlive with ccache-default... > > Yes, this is weird. I haven't really made a test series to see whether > it *alwa

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

2011-01-11 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
At Tue, 11 Jan 2011 20:26:59 +0100, Martin Costabel wrote: > > On 11/01/11 19:50 , Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > > [For Install] > > Does the following command improve the situation? > > $ mv /Users/costabel/.texmf-var /Users/costabel/.texmf-var.old > > No, I had alre

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

2011-01-11 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
rm -Rf ~/.texmf-var; fi in the PreInstScript. I recommend you use fmtutil-sys and updmap-sys if possible, instead of fmtutil and updmap. Tomoaki Okayama -- Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks Learn about

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

2011-01-11 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
h an error, and how to fix it. Any ideas? Tomoaki Okayama At Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:23:49 +0100, Martin Costabel wrote: > > On 10/01/11 14:16 , Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > [] > > Some desirous check points: > > > > * Build/Install (of course) and Update from a current texlive

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

2011-01-11 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
workaround acceptable for the Fink policy? For another report (10.5/i386), please send me the full build log with a compressed format (or put to Web). If you find a solution for that problem, please let me know. Tomoaki Okayama At Tue, 11 Jan 2011 08:40:41 +0100, Martin Costabel wrote: > >

[Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

2011-01-10 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
ptex, dvipdfmx, jadetex As a big difference from before, some new packages are included in this version. If you are familiar with these software, please test them. Thank you for your cooperation. Tomoaki Okayama -- Gaini

Re: [Fink-devel] conflicts/replaces issue between ptex-base and texlive-base

2010-07-09 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
feedback. Tomoaki Okayama At Fri, 9 Jul 2010 14:08:10 -0600, David R. Morrison wrote: > > The only resolution that I see is to move texlive* and ptex* to stable. Are > they ready? > > -- Dave > > > On Jul 9, 2010, at 1:37 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > >

Re: [Fink-devel] conflicts/replaces issue between ptex-base and texlive-base

2010-07-09 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
Hi, At Fri, 9 Jul 2010 08:07:03 -0600, David R. Morrison wrote: > > > On Jul 9, 2010, at 7:31 AM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: > > > > > [1] Why the buildworld is building the ptex-base from stable is a whole > > other issue, and I have no idea as to why it's doing this. It does > > buil

Re: [Fink-devel] TeX Live in unstable

2009-10-12 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
At Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:07:28 +0200, Carsten Schultz wrote: > > Tomoaki Okayama schrieb: > > At Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:59:49 +0200, > > Carsten Schultz wrote: > >> I appreciate your effort, since tetex is getting old. On the other > >> hand, it works fine fo

Re: [Fink-devel] TeX Live in unstable

2009-10-12 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
At Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:59:49 +0200, Carsten Schultz wrote: > > Tomoaki Okayama schrieb: > > Dear Fink users/developers, > > > > I am pleased to announce that TeX Live is now available on > > 10.4/10.5/10.6 in unstable. Enjoy it! > > > > - libkpat

Re: [Fink-devel] TeX Live in unstable

2009-10-11 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
ive and drops teTeX, with the permission of the maintainer of tetex*. Tomoaki Okayama P.S. Also thanks for the detailed explanation about Provides. It also troubled me a lot, and that is the main reason why the virtual package "tetex3-base" was introduced in tetex.info and ptex.

Re: [Fink-devel] TeX Live in unstable

2009-10-10 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
I've also tested the patch on 10.4/PPC, 10.5/PPC and 10.5/i386, and updated finkinfos. Thanks for your report. Tomoaki Okayama At Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:27:29 +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: > > Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > > What will happen by applying the attached patch to lcoco

Re: [Fink-devel] TeX Live in unstable

2009-10-10 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
What will happen by applying the attached patch to lcoco.c? At Sat, 10 Oct 2009 20:41:57 +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: > > Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > > Dear Fink users/developers, > > > > I am pleased to announce that TeX Live is now available on > > 10.4/1

Re: [Fink-devel] TeX Live in unstable

2009-10-10 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
I've fixed PatchFile-MD5 in libkpathsea4.info. Thanks. At Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:08:52 +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: > > Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > > Dear Fink users/developers, > > > > I am pleased to announce that TeX Live is now available on > > 10.4/10.5/10.

[Fink-devel] TeX Live in unstable

2009-10-10 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
, are not compiled by --without-pkg configure options. But if you like, texlive-base can provide these packages. Other requests are welcome; please send a patch with your explanation. Best regards, Tomoaki Okayama -- C

[Fink-devel] TeX Live

2009-09-21 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
is no positive feedback from 10.6 users. Could anyone tell me it works or not? Any other feedbacks are welcome. To save time, EXPLICIT patches with your explanation are very appreciated. Thank you for your cooperation. Tomoaki Ok

Re: [Fink-devel] [RFC] test finkinfo for TeX Live

2009-05-24 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
her fink packages as long as files of fink packages are installed in /sw/share/texmf or /sw/etc/texmf.local. The success of installation does not mean the package works right. Thank you for your cooperation. Tomoaki Okayama At Thu, 07 May 2009 01:52:36 +0900, Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > &

Re: [Fink-devel] [RFC] test finkinfo for TeX Live

2009-05-12 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
Hello, thanks for your comments. At Sun, 10 May 2009 21:36:00 +0200, Jean-François Mertens wrote: > > Hi ! > > Thanks for this great work! > > A couple of small points : > > 1) > On 08 May 2009, at 07:16, Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > > Hmm, it seems dif

Re: [Fink-devel] [RFC] test finkinfo for TeX Live

2009-05-08 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
or this for years. Now the only thing still missing is a > system-texlive package ;-) > Thanks, but I'd like to leave system-texlive to drm. I have never used system-tetex, and I'm not sure how to package system-texlive. Tomoaki Okayama

Re: [Fink-devel] [RFC] test finkinfo for TeX Live

2009-05-07 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
uld be work: $ sudo apt-get install texlive=0.20080816-0 even if tetex is installed. Tomoaki Okayama At Thu, 7 May 2009 08:32:31 -0300, Monic Polynomial wrote: > > On 06/05/2009, at 13:52, Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > > (...) > > > I've already tested them and th

Re: [Fink-devel] [RFC] test finkinfo for TeX Live

2009-05-06 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
one. Sorry for the inconvenience. Tomoaki Okayama At Wed, 6 May 2009 14:43:02 -0300, Monic Polynomial wrote: > > On 06/05/2009, at 14:34, Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > > In order to checkout the experimental tree, please do: > > > > $ cvs -d :pserver:anonym...@fink.cvs.sourc

Re: [Fink-devel] [RFC] test finkinfo for TeX Live

2009-05-06 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
In order to checkout the experimental tree, please do: $ cvs -d :pserver:anonym...@fink.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/fink checkout -P experimental Thanks for your interest. At Wed, 6 May 2009 14:20:47 -0300, Monic Polynomial wrote: > > On 06/05/2009, at 13:52, Tomoaki Okayama wrote:

[Fink-devel] [RFC] test finkinfo for TeX Live

2009-05-06 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
ption that tetex doesn't conflict with (oncoming) ptex. I'm now working on the ptex issues. Best regards, Tomoaki Okayama -- The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scan

Re: [Fink-devel] Dependency of imagemagick

2009-01-03 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
oach, both libdjvulibre15-shlibs and openexr don't have dependency on x11 anymore. I prefer James's approach rather than mine. (This is my own personal feeling, and I would like to leave it to the maintainers to judge it.) Thanks, Tomoaki Okayama At Sat, 3 Jan 2009 23:47:49 +1100, James Bunton wro

Re: [Fink-devel] Dependency of imagemagick

2009-01-03 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
: svg.a, svg.la, and svg.so. See also gimp2 and gnuplot, which excellently divide packages into two: gnome-dependent and gnome-independent. [imagemagick-nox.info] * openexr depends on x11. Deleted. * Sync with imagemagick.info. Thanks, Tomoaki Okayama At Sun, 25 May 2008 02:47:20 +0900, Tomoaki

Re: [Fink-devel] please update Fink wxmac28 to 2.8.9

2009-01-02 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
Happy New Year to all, The build of new wxmac28 was successfully completed on all archs: 10.4/ppc, 10.4/intel, 10.5/ppc, 10.5/intel. I have just committed the new finkinfo to unstable. Thank you for sending a new finkinfo to us. Regards, Tomoaki Okayama At Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:58:29 -0500

Re: [Fink-devel] Let's update gimp2 on pangocairo-branch!

2008-05-26 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
At Mon, 26 May 2008 17:01:33 -0400, Alexander Strange wrote: > > > [gimp2-help.info] (diff from the original finkinfo by Sebastien Maret) > > * Source: > > - Use gimp mirror. > > * Conflicts: > > - Conflicts with old gimp2*. > > * PatchScript: > > - 'cp -a' are not found in Makefile.in. Delete. >

Re: [Fink-devel] Let's update gimp2 on pangocairo-branch!

2008-05-24 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
chScript: - 'cp -a' are not found in Makefile.in. Delete. - Shell-buildin echo cannot accept -n option. Use /bin/echo -n instead. * ConfigureParams: - Add --disable-network. * InstallScript: - Add "top_builddir=`pwd`" to avoid installing errors. Do

Re: [Fink-devel] Dependency of imagemagick

2008-05-24 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
suggestions? Or, are there any ideas for that? I renewed patches for suggestion (1), and attached. * 10.4_imagemagick.splitoff.diff (for 10.4 HEAD) * pango_imagemagick.splitoff.diff (for 10.4 pangocairo) Thanks, Tomoaki Okayama At Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:06:07 +0900, Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > >

Re: [Fink-devel] nox packages, wrongly depend on x11

2008-05-24 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
Hello, imagemagick-nox still depends on openexr, which depends on X11. Please apply attached patches. * 10.4_imagemagick-nox.fix.diff (for 10.4 HEAD) * pango_imagemagick-nox.fix.diff (for 10.4 pangocairo-branch) Thanks, Tomoaki Okayama At Tue, 29 Apr 2008 02:12:24 +0900, Tomoaki Okayama wrote

Re: [Fink-devel] xrender.pc in pango1-xft2-ft219

2008-05-10 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
That's a great solution! It seems to work properly in my env. I'm looking forward to your update. Thanks, Tomoaki Okayama At Thu, 8 May 2008 11:16:12 -0400, Daniel Macks wrote: > > On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 04:59:57AM +0900, Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > > Hello, > > &g

[Fink-devel] xrender.pc in pango1-xft2-ft219

2008-05-06 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
x27;s not good. I recommend removing xrender.pc from pango1-xft2-ft219, at least in 10.5. Thanks, Tomoaki Okayama - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting

Re: [Fink-devel] Let's update gimp2 on pangocairo-branch!

2008-05-01 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
at should be > used more wisely. > I'm sorry for not checking the tracker first... After I read Strange's e-mail, I realized that. I didn't intend to take your submittion lightly, but to leave it up to the maintainer's discretion. Thanks, Tomoaki Okayama gi

Re: [Fink-devel] Let's update gimp2 on pangocairo-branch!

2008-04-30 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1942780&group_id=17203&atid=414256 > > For some reason I can't find the start of this thread in gmane or my > inbox, so I can't compare them. > As noted above, my patch follows your original packaging way. Another one seems to

[Fink-devel] Let's update gimp2 on pangocairo-branch!

2008-04-30 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
. * ConfigureParams: - Add --disable-python. * PatchScript: - Delete unneeded security patches. - Shell-buildin echo cannot accept -n option. Use /bin/echo -n instead. * Depends: - netpbm-shlibs is not needed. * Files:, ConfFiles: - Some new files are added. Thanks, Tomoaki Okayama

[Fink-devel] Dependency of imagemagick

2008-04-28 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
sound? Thanks, Tomoaki Okayama imagemagick_head.diff Description: Binary data imagemagick_pangocairo.diff Description: Binary data - This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this y

[Fink-devel] nox packages, wrongly depend on x11

2008-04-28 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
them are not available, nox-users cannot install imagemagick-nox. Is that ok? Is there any policy in Fink? Thanks, Tomoaki Okayama nox_gnuplot.diff Description: Binary data nox_imagemagick.diff Description: Binary data

Re: [Fink-devel] [cvs] dists/10.4/unstable/main/finkinfo/graphics cairo.info, 1.9.2.17, 1.9.2.18

2008-03-30 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
> - fontconfig2-dev (>= 2.4.1-1), > > + fontconfig2-dev (>= 2.4.1-102), > > fontconfig2-dev is only available at 2.4.1-5. > > dan > You mean, 10.4 users may use pangocairo-branch? OK, I also revert the changes. Thank you for the comments! Tomoaki Okayama

Re: [Fink-devel] Build results on pangocairo-branch

2008-02-03 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
removeall fink -y build ${pkg} done fink validate /path/to/*.deb fink selfupdate and go back to the beginning. The variable ${pkg} is the list of all Fink packages, in alphabetical order. See README for the details. Thanks, Tomoaki Okayama > And: was it done in strict build-order

[Fink-devel] Build results on pangocairo-branch

2008-02-02 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
lable temporarily at: http://fink.sodan.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~okayama/build-10.5-i386/ Thanks, Tomoaki Okayama * log summary here * Broken dependent package's deb -> broken class-factory-util-pm_1.7-1021_darwin-i386.deb * datetime-format-builder-pm588 * datetime-forma

[Fink-devel] Security issue of gv

2007-08-20 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
. debian/patches/CVE-2006-5864.diff is the patch. Please apply it to gv in 10.3/unstable and 10.4/unstable. Or, updating to gv-3.6.3 also fixes this problem. If there is no maintainer of gv, we "Todai Fink Team" would like to maintain gv. Would it be ok? Thanks, Tomoa

[Fink-devel] Patch for fixing errors and supporting kanji for libkpathsea4

2006-11-25 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
However there is no harm for tetex users by this patch, so I think it's better to apply it to libkpathsea4 than to create a new package. I tested on 10.3, 10.4 PPC / intel. The patch command is following: $ patch -p0 < libkpathsea4-magstep-libkanji.patch Thanks in advance, Tomoaki Oka

[Fink-devel] Request for additional module support for freetype219

2006-11-24 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
(although it is available at 2.1.10). I attached a 1-line patch for fix this problem, so could you apply it please? $ cat freetype-2.2.1-otvalid.patch >> freetype219.patch Thanks in advance, Tomoaki Okayama freetype-2.2.1-otvalid.patch Des

Re: [Fink-devel] Please update auctex

2006-10-02 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
At Mon, 2 Oct 2006 09:16:57 -0400, Alexander Hansen wrote: > > On 10/2/06, Tomoaki Okayama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I made a finkinfo of auctex-11.83. Could I commit this to unstable > > tree? > > > > (snip) > > &

[Fink-devel] Please update auctex

2006-10-01 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
/experimental/todai/ecc-10.4/main/finkinfo/editors/auctex.info?revision=1.2&view=markup http://fink.cvs.sourceforge.net/fink/experimental/todai/ecc-10.4/main/finkinfo/editors/auctex.patch?revision=1.2&view=markup I tested on 10.3 and 10.4, with emacs21 and emacs22. Thanks in advance, Tomoaki

Re: [Fink-devel] [tutors-dev:01835] Package feedback

2006-09-30 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
ossible, we "Todai Fink Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" would like to take over the Maintainer. Thanks in advance, Tomoaki Okayama At Fri, 14 Oct 2005 19:22:50 +0200, Max Horn wrote: > > dillo-i18n > -- > As maintainer of the "dillo" package I would have appre

[Fink-devel] Request for native language support for tgif (again)

2006-09-23 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
ested on 10.3 and 10.4 (both powerpc and i386) with --build-as-nobody. In March and April, Asari has already made the same request to the former maintainer, Jeffrey Whitaker. I foward the mails FYI. Thanks in advance, Tomoaki Okayama At Wed, 05 Apr 2006 08:42:35 +0900, ASARI Takashi wrote: >

[Fink-devel] URW fonts bugs in ghostscript-fonts

2006-07-09 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
Hello, URW fonts in the ghostscript-fonts package are broken. Can you replace the fonts with CTAN's ones? I attached a patch. FYI: http://www.codecomments.com/archive276-2004-7-242577.html Thanks in advance, -- Tomoaki Okayama ghostscript-fonts-fix-urw-fonts.patch Description: Binary

[Fink-devel] Please upgrade imagemagick and support libj2k

2006-04-08 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
Hello, I attached a patch to imagemagick.info in 10.4/unstable in order to upgrade the package and support libjasper1. I tested this on both PPC and Intel. Could you apply this patch please? $ patch -p0 imagemagick.info < imagemagick-renewal.patch Thanks in advance, -- Tomoaki Okay

[Fink-devel] Can't resolve dependency of maxima

2006-04-08 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
uot; (no matching packages/versions found) The version of clisp.info in 10.4/unstable/main is 2.35-1001, so please change the dependency to Depends: clisp (=2.35-1001). -- Tomoaki Okayama / Todai Fink Team --- This SF.Net email is sponsored

[Fink-devel] Please use tetex3-base instead of tetex-base (>= 3.0-1)

2006-04-08 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
ox-base (>= 3.0) <--> ptex-nox-base (>= 3.1.8.1) (no virtual package) tetex-base (>= 2.0) <--> ptex-base (>= 3.1.3) -- Tomoaki Okayama / Todai Fink Team --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scr

[Fink-devel] Re: Please upgrade texpower.info to version 0.2

2006-03-25 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
Thank you for your quick reply! I committed the new finkinfo to unstable tree. At Sat, 25 Mar 2006 07:58:33 -0800, David R. Morrison wrote: > > You may take it over if you like. > >-- Dave > > On Mar 25, 2006, at 7:51 AM, Tomoaki Okayama wrote: > > > Hello, &g

[Fink-devel] Please upgrade texpower.info to version 0.2

2006-03-25 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
Hello, I attached a patch to texpower.info for updating it. Could you commit it or may I take over this package? -- Tomoaki Okayama / Todai Fink Team --- texpower.info.orig 2006-01-21 05:32:31.0 +0900 +++ texpower.info 2006-03-26 00:39:57.0 +0900 @@ -1,12 +1,19

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: [tutors-dev:02367] Please change Conflicts/Replaces in tetex.info

2006-03-07 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
nstable tree ;-) I have already tested and committed it. You can see both of the switch at hagi (Todai Fink Team's machine). -- Tomoaki Okayama / Todai Fink Team --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language th

[Fink-devel] Re: [tutors-dev:02367] Please change Conflicts/Replaces in tetex.info

2006-03-06 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
ex, ptex-base OK: tetex-base <-> ptex-base This is because in the case of shinra's workaround tetex-base (>= 0) is not in tetex[-nox]-base's Conflicts/Replaces but in tetex[-nox]. tetex-base (>= 0) should write in tetex[-nox]-base's Conflicts/Replaces. -- Tomoaki Okay

[Fink-devel] Please change Conflicts/Replaces in tetex.info

2006-03-06 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
3-base", however, the packager should write only Depends: tetex3-base. Please think about them ;-) -- Tomoaki Okayama / Todai Fink Team --- tetex.info.orig 2005-04-27 12:26:41.0 +0900 +++ tetex.info 2006-03-07 03:21:57.0 +0900 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Package: tetex%type_pkg[-nox] Type:

Re: [Fink-devel] ESP Ghostscript

2006-02-27 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
gt; something like this with its mta-switch script. I see. Such a script is now included and I let the script be not called automatically when installing. Thanks for your advice! -- Tomoaki Okayama / Todai Fink Team --- This SF.Net email is spo

[Fink-devel] ESP Ghostscript

2006-02-26 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
ll be happy. Thanks, -- Tomoaki Okayama / Todai Fink Team --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer grou

[Fink-devel] ESP Ghostscript

2006-02-26 Thread Tomoaki Okayama
7;s cups, it is necessary to handle system's directory(out of /sw). Symbolic links must be created at least. That handlings in PostInstScript and PreRmScript are commented out now, but would it be possible to uncomment them and commit to unstable? If it is ok, lots of cups users will be happy.