Can't do an automated update from CVS right now because the abiword
tarball appears to be non existent.
The following 7 packages will be installed or updated:
abiword lame lame-shlibs libxml2 libxml2-bin libxml2-shlibs mad
The following 2 additional packages will be installed:
mad-bin mad-s
Hi all,
SourceForge.net has added some mirrors for
prdownloads.sourceforge.net, and changed the way files are
downloaded. At the moment this means that quite a few fink
packages will fail to download. This is an issue which we know
about and Max is working with the sourceforge team to resolve
>
>
>If you find yourself unable to wait to install a package which has a source URL at
>prdownloads.sourceforge.net, don't worry, you can download the source code yourself.
>All you have to do is cd into /sw/src and then issue the same curl command you saw in
>the failed download phase, changin
Alexander: I'm also having problems with the April 2002 DevTools -
xfree86-rootless in particular won't compile. If you succeed in
uninstalling the April tools, please let me know how you did it.
-Jeff
On Thu, 2 May 2002, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> I did a clean install of fink at about the s
Title: broken sudoers
I've gone and broken my sudoers file, and can't sudo now. I
opened it in BBedit to add the line:
ALL = NOPASSWD: ALL
but it now comes up with the message "sudo:
/etc/sudoers is mode 0640, should be 0440"
Any idea what to do?
--
Dan O'Brien
The Dancing Ox Company
22 Cast
At 7:04 AM -0600 5/3/02, Jeff Whitaker wrote:
>Alexander: I'm also having problems with the April 2002 DevTools -
>xfree86-rootless in particular won't compile. If you succeed in
>uninstalling the April tools, please let me know how you did it.
Are you sure the problem is the dev tools? What
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Ben Hines wrote:
>
> Are you sure the problem is the dev tools? What are your errors? It's
> much more likely to be a fink problem. For example xfree86 won't
> download currently because prdownloads is hosed.
Absolutely sure. Builds with Dec tools, not with April tools.
>
>
On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 09:21 AM, Dan O'Brien wrote:
> I've gone and broken my sudoers file, and can't sudo now. I opened it
> in BBedit to add the line:
> ALL = NOPASSWD: ALL
> but it now comes up with the message "sudo: /etc/sudoers is mode 0640,
> should be 0440"
> Any idea what to d
Erik Price writes:
>
> On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 09:21 AM, Dan O'Brien wrote:
>
> > I've gone and broken my sudoers file, and can't sudo now. I
> > opened it in BBedit to add the line: ALL =
> > NOPASSWD: ALL but it now comes up with the message "sudo:
> > /etc/sudoers is mode 0640,
I want to install Gimp and some other stuff, but my ISP cuts
me off every two hours, interrupting my downloads. I have speed
download, which allows me to resume browser downloads, so I was
wondering if I could download my files through download accelerator
via IE, and then put them so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
well, if you can't sudo, you must enable root, become root, and then
chmod 0440 /etc/sudoers
On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 09:21 AM, Dan O'Brien wrote:
> I've gone and broken my sudoers file, and can't sudo now. I opened it
> in BBedit to add t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
yes, or if you like, install wget.
I like wget much better than curl, it works with less problems. there is
a -c option for it (curl has one too) which will continue the download
from where it left off...
On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 10:00 AM, Dan
On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 10:00 AM, Dan O'Brien wrote:
> I want to install Gimp and some other stuff, but my ISP cuts me
> off every two hours, interrupting my downloads. I have speed download,
> which allows me to resume browser downloads, so I was wondering if I
> could download my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 10:30 AM, Erik Price wrote:
> On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 10:00 AM, Dan O'Brien wrote:
>> I want to install Gimp and some other stuff, but my ISP cuts me
>> off every two hours, interrupting my downloads. I have speed
Hi,
Last night I did a fink update, and it installed a newer version of libxml2
(which is needed by daemonic which in turn is needed by anacron). Libxml2
is apparently expanding, because it now also depends on python, which in
turn depends on quite some other packages. This all seems overkill
I apologize if this message is not of the proper caliber for this list. I
am simply desperate and do not know where else to turn.
I am trying to install Fink 0.4.0 on Darwin 1.4.1. When I run
./bootstrap.sh, I eventually get the following message:
BOOTSTRAP PHASE ONE: download tarballs
curl -f
On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 01:54 PM, edwin sutton waldmire iv wrote:
> I apologize if this message is not of the proper caliber for this
> list. I
> am simply desperate and do not know where else to turn.
There is also a "Fink-Beginner's List". You might find this helpful for
future proble
I can't seem to get pine-ssl to build, although pine builds OK. I found a
suspicious line in my build process:
Including LDAP functionality
File /sw/etc/ssl/factory.pem is missing
I verified that the file was indeed missing. If this file is indeed
necessary, which package should have it?
Alexander:
This line is a warning - I don't think it's the source of your problem.
Where exactly does your build fail? What versions of openldap and openssl
do you have installed?
-Jeff
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> I can't seem to get pine-ssl to build, although pine builds
At 6:48 AM -0700 5/3/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I've gone and broken my sudoers file, and can't sudo now. I opened it
>in BBedit to add the line:
> ALL = NOPASSWD: ALL
>but it now comes up with the message "sudo: /etc/sudoers is mode
>0640, should be 0440"
>Any idea what to do?
Dan,
Other pe
[ldx3:/] hansen% fink list openldap openssl
Reading package info...
Information about 1001 packages read in 14 seconds.
openldap2.0.19-1An open source implementation of LDAP
i openldap-ssl2.0.23-3An LDAP directory services implementation
i openldap-ssl-de 2.0.23-3li
Fink is going crazy on me. On fink-selfupdate I'm getting "unpacking the
tarball fink-09.11.tar.gz .failed" Fink update-all is giving many
warnings of "Possible unterminated here-document" The reason I started
updating is I replaced xtools with xfree86 and Grace gave the msg abt the
motif
At 6:13 PM -0400 5/3/02, tom keyes wrote:
>Fink is going crazy on me. On fink-selfupdate I'm getting "unpacking the
>tarball fink-09.11.tar.gz .failed" Fink update-all is giving many
>warnings of "Possible unterminated here-document" The reason I started
>updating is I replaced xtools with
At 10:30 AM -0400 3/5/02, Erik Price wrote:
>On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 10:00 AM, Dan O'Brien wrote:
>
>> I want to install Gimp and some other stuff, but my ISP cuts
>>me off every two hours, interrupting my downloads. I have speed
>>download, which allows me to resume browser downloads,
I am trying sometime ago to use "graphftpweblog" since ftpweblog
works so well (although is a pity ProFTPd is yet not there), I have
installed from fink and directly from macosxgnu GD.pm but it seems to
have a version incompatibility that I dont know how to avoid... See
it below:
% graphf
proftpd is in unstable.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>works so well (although is a pity ProFTPd is yet not there), I have
¸.·´^`·.,][JFH][`·.,¸¸.·´][JFH][¸.·´^`·.,
Justin F. Hallett - Systems Analyst
Phone: (780)-408-3094
Fax: (780)-454-3200
E-Mail: [
I have just made a fresh install of MacOS X 10.1.4 and the April
Dev Tools. Then i installed the latest fink-binary. When i run
'fink list' everything look OK but when I try to install it all
goes down the drain. This is what I get:
[c213-100-32-76:~] bishop% fink install "xfree86-rootles"
sud
I see one indirect mention of this in the archives, but no response. I use
CVS and the unstable trees, so I stay a right on the bleeding edge. The last
time Nethack was updated, it stopped using the X graphical interface. Now,
far be it from me to upset decades of traditon for those who respect th
On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 10:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [c213-100-32-76:~] bishop% fink install "xfree86-rootles"
It's "xfree86-rootless" =)
> curl -f -L -s -S -O
> http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/fink/dlcompat-20020413.tar.gz
> curl: (22) The requested file was not found
> ### cu
pine-ssl has been updated in cvs (pine-ssl-4.44-2) - should now build
when openldap-ssl is installed.
-Jeff
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Alexander Hansen wrote:
> [ldx3:/] hansen% fink list openldap openssl
> Reading package info...
> Information about 1001 packages read in 14 seconds.
> openldap
On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 10:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [c213-100-32-76:~] bishop% fink install "xfree86-rootles"
It's 'xfree86-rootless' :)
> curl -f -L -s -S -O
> http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/fink/dlcompat-20020413.tar.gz
prdownloads is temporarily broken. Download the file vi
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Alexander Strange wrote:
> On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 10:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > [c213-100-32-76:~] bishop% fink install "xfree86-rootles"
>
> It's 'xfree86-rootless' :)
Yes. The Rutles were a Beatles parody with Eric Idle :)
--
Chris Devers
On 3 May 2002, tom keyes wrote:
> Fink is going crazy on me. On fink-selfupdate I'm getting "unpacking the
> tarball fink-09.11.tar.gz .failed" Fink update-all is giving
> many warnings of "Possible unterminated here-document"
Is it me, or are *a lot* of people getting bugs like this lat
On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 11:59 PM, Chris Devers wrote:
> I'm sorry that I don't have any, but I've got a feeling that a lot of
> people hare seeing different versions of the same problem that you are.
> As far as I've noticed, no clear explanation or remedy has emerged yet,
> but I would be ver
34 matches
Mail list logo
