On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 09:52 -0400, Robert McGwier wrote:
> Bob Cowdery wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 19:20 -0500, KE5EUP wrote:
> >
> >
> I'd like to have:
>
> 1. A platform independent GUI.
> 2. An IDE that makes GUI development "nice" (i.e. NOT VC6 style).
>
>
I offered this code as an example of a 2.0 port. I bailed out on it in March,
since
it was very time consuming, and there was absolutely no resonance with
the folks on the reflector. It started as a kind of jigsaw project, just
sorting the pieces into object categories, would need to be refactor
Bob Cowdery wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 19:20 -0500, KE5EUP wrote:
>
>
I'd like to have:
1. A platform independent GUI.
2. An IDE that makes GUI development "nice" (i.e. NOT VC6 style).
> I think one should consider in all this the push into distribution
IF you wanted to maximise the SDR1000 group participation in programming
I'd say that the design architecture is paramount and would lead onto
choosing the programming language(s) to suit the structure best.
As a family man with limited time for hobbies I'd like to be able to
develop a small chun
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 19:20 -0500, KE5EUP wrote:
> >> I'd like to have:
> >>
> >> 1. A platform independent GUI.
> >> 2. An IDE that makes GUI development "nice" (i.e. NOT VC6 style).
> >>
I think one should consider in all this the push into distribution with
Erlang which frees up each node to be
I have an uninformed question. What about Python?
Forgive the ignorance, I have a series of books and learning it is on my
short list this winter. The web site states and I quote below:
"Python runs on Windows, Linux/Unix, Mac OS X, OS/2, Amiga, Palm
Handhelds, and Nokia mobile phones. Python ha
At 04:10 PM 10/18/2006, Ken Klein wrote:
>Jim;
>
>Please excuse a really dumb question: Why NOT use Java??? Seems to me for
>an Open Source project such as this, that would be the first choice.
Not a dumb question at all.
It would revolve around whether you want to have maximum portability
or
:00 PM
To: Eric Wachsmann; 'Philip Covington'
Cc: 'FlexList'
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Q for software team (Was: PowerSDR Open Source Fan)
At 02:43 PM 10/18/2006, Eric Wachsmann wrote:
>I'd like to have:
>
>1. A platform independent GUI.
>2. An IDE that makes
At 02:43 PM 10/18/2006, Eric Wachsmann wrote:
>I'd like to have:
>
>1. A platform independent GUI.
>2. An IDE that makes GUI development "nice" (i.e. NOT VC6 style).
>
>I am not stuck on any tool or language at this point as I don't have enough
>information to say, "This is the best tool" or "This
At 01:36 PM 10/18/2006, Philip Covington wrote:
>On 10/18/06, Jim Lux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>At 11:29 AM 10/18/2006, Philip Covington wrote:
>>
>> >Well, the first place I would start is to open the Console project
>> >file in C# Express and let it convert the project - then start fixing
>> >
On 10/18/06, Jim Lux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 11:29 AM 10/18/2006, Philip Covington wrote:
>
> >Well, the first place I would start is to open the Console project
> >file in C# Express and let it convert the project - then start fixing
> >the problems with .NET 1.1 to .NET 2.0 from there.
>
ED]; FlexList
> Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Q for software team (Was: PowerSDR Open Source
> Fan)
>
> On 10/18/06, Eric Wachsmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Not necessarily. I would prefer to have a cross platform solution. I
> have
> > not evaluated
On 10/18/06, Eric Wachsmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not necessarily. I would prefer to have a cross platform solution. I have
> not evaluated Eclipse yet, but it sounds like it could be an alternative.
>
>
> Eric Wachsmann
> FlexRadio Systems
>
I thought Eclipse was a development environmen
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > radio.biz] On Behalf Of Philip Covington
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 3:44 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: FlexList
> > Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Q for software team (Was: PowerSDR Open Source
>
Behalf Of Philip Covington
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 3:44 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: FlexList
> Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Q for software team (Was: PowerSDR Open Source
> Fan)
>
...Sounds like the plan is the Console will stay in C#
> tho
On 10/18/06, Bob Cowdery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 13:20 -0400, Philip Covington wrote:
> > On 10/18/06, James Courtier-Dutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Eric wrote on 10/10/06
> > > >
> > > > "We ARE NOT planning on using the same tools for the future versions of
>
At 11:29 AM 10/18/2006, Philip Covington wrote:
>Well, the first place I would start is to open the Console project
>file in C# Express and let it convert the project - then start fixing
>the problems with .NET 1.1 to .NET 2.0 from there.
You will get well over 400 warnings and errors when you lo
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 13:20 -0400, Philip Covington wrote:
> On 10/18/06, James Courtier-Dutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Eric wrote on 10/10/06
> > >
> > > "We ARE NOT planning on using the same tools for the future versions of
> > > the software. Rather, we will use FREE TOOLS. We have n
On 10/18/06, Jerry Flanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 17:26 10/18/2006, you wrote:
>
> >Another think to think about is that someone could take up converting
> >PowerSDR console to work with .NET 2.0. Since C# Express is free,
> >someone could get started on this with no monetary investment
At 17:26 10/18/2006, you wrote:
>Another think to think about is that someone could take up converting
>PowerSDR console to work with .NET 2.0. Since C# Express is free,
>someone could get started on this with no monetary investment in
>development tools.
>
>The other supporting library DLLs, lik
At 10:26 AM 10/18/2006, Philip Covington wrote:
>On 10/18/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The release of the new version shouldn't be the primary criteria for
> > purchasing the IDE for version 1.x
> >
> > I
> > -Tim
> > ---
> > Integrated Technical Services
>
>Another think to think
On 10/18/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The release of the new version shouldn't be the primary criteria for
> purchasing the IDE for version 1.x
>
> I believe, that there is not going to be point in the future (if ever)
> where PowerSDR 1.x will not be usable with the SDR-1000 hardwa
On 10/18/06, James Courtier-Dutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Eric wrote on 10/10/06
> >
> > "We ARE NOT planning on using the same tools for the future versions of
> > the software. Rather, we will use FREE TOOLS. We have not settled 100%
> > on what those free tools will be, but right Visua
At 08:36 AM 10/18/2006, Tim Ellison wrote:
>The release of the new version shouldn't be the primary criteria for
>purchasing the IDE for version 1.x
>
>I believe, that there is not going to be point in the future (if ever)
>where PowerSDR 1.x will not be usable with the SDR-1000 hardware. Flex
>ha
rything is just enough."
-Rob Barlow
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Flanders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 11:09 AM
To: Tim Ellison; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: RE: [Flexradio] Q for software team (Was: PowerSDR Open Source
Fan)
Thanks, Tim
Yes, man
hing is just enough."
>-Rob Barlow
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry Flanders
>Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 10:12 AM
>To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
>Subject: [Flexradio] Q for software team (Was: PowerSDR O
Sedona,AZ
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry Flanders
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 7:12 AM
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] Q for software team (Was: PowerSDR Open Source Fan)
Could someone from the software team
> Eric wrote on 10/10/06
>
> "We ARE NOT planning on using the same tools for the future versions of
> the software. Rather, we will use FREE TOOLS. We have not settled 100%
> on what those free tools will be, but right Visual Studio 2005 Express
> versions are looking to be the best pick for th
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry Flanders
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 10:12 AM
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] Q for software team (Was: PowerSDR Open Source Fan)
Could someone from the software team give us an up
Could someone from the software team give us an update on the search
for the new set of tools. Does it look promising? Any estimate of
when might we be able to switch over (if ever)?
Jerry W4UK
At 03:37 10/18/2006, Ken Klein wrote:
>Rick;
>
>I'm waiting for the version that uses the free tools,
30 matches
Mail list logo
