[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
John D. Ament updated INCUBATOR-142:
Component/s: (was: LogoSubmission)
> Testing - Sally graphics submiss
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
John D. Ament updated INCUBATOR-141:
Component/s: (was: LogoSubmission)
> Test
>
>
> Ke
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
John D. Ament updated INCUBATOR-143:
Component/s: (was: LogoSubmission)
> SallyTest
I
> can link.
> I'll also send you the link to the blog post so we can point to each other.
> If not, please let me know how you'd like to proceed.
> Thanks,Sally = = = = = vox +1 617 921 8656gvox +1 646 598 4616skype
> sallykhudairi
>
> From: Sally Khudairi <s
I'll point out that the link Martjin pointed to is a follow up conversation
after the vote thread that originally introduced allowing podling artifacts
to be distributed via Maven.
Just to level set. I don't think its fair to expect a special policy for a
single podling.
On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 9:40 AM Daniel Dekany wrote:
> The original question in this thread is much less generic than in the
> linked one though, so it's certainly easier to answer.
Thanks for the link Martjin! Definitely a late night reading exercise.
Maybe since Jukka and Bertrand are around they can give us feedback as well
:-)
Either way will digest.
John
On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 7:50 AM Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> For reference, please read
On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 12:02 AM Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 11:46 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > Pssst really need you guys looking at the proposed replacement
> > documentation.
> >
>
> -Sally = = = = = vox +1 617 921 8656gvox +1 646 598 4616skype
> sallykhudairi
>
> From: Sally Khudairi <s...@apache.org>
> To: John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>; "general@incubator.apache.org"
> <general@incubator.apache.org>
> Sent:
vox +1 617 921 8656 <(617)%20921-8656>
> gvox +1 646 598 4616 <(646)%20598-4616>
> skype sallykhudairi
>
>
> --
> *From:* Sally Khudairi <s...@apache.org>
> *To:* John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>; "general@incubator.apache.org"
>
ink, but I
don't think its a bad one in this case).
John
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 9:07 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> Dale,
>
> Thanks. Before publishing this, I was planning to remove the link on
> [5]. The policy docs are complete as they stand right now fro
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 9:37 PM Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 6:26 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 9:14 PM Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>
> > wrote:
> >
&g
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 9:31 PM Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 6:17 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > This is what I'm trying to say with these sentences:
> >
> > Those reviewing the releas
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 9:14 PM Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 6:08 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > That doesn't work well from a permission standpoint.
>
> Can you elaborate?
>
There's a permis
This is what I'm trying to say with these sentences:
Those reviewing the releases will provide the release managers
with information about what is wrong with the release.
Release managers should consider issues reported as blocking, unless told
otherwise
by
I'm planning to add this, what do you think?
In order for a podling to receive full permission from the IPMC to execute
the release, the release
vote must be held on the incubator general list
and pass based on the http://apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes;>standard Package
Release
user to [4] for all the std stuff, and remove the list item/link
> in [4] so there’s no cycle
>
> new-incubator/releasemanagement -> incubating-policy/#releases ->
> dev/#releases
>
> [5] http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
>
> — Da
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 5:35 AM Daniel Dekany wrote:
> Wednesday, December 28, 2016, 4:12:06 AM, Christopher wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > The one complication here is that the release artifact (source tarball)
> is
> > most easily created with a maven project by using the
>
gt;
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 4:03 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm looking for some additional mentors for a potential new podling -
> > Hammock. If anyone has bandwidth and interest, let me know (reply all or
> >
Hi,
I'm looking for some additional mentors for a potential new podling -
Hammock. If anyone has bandwidth and interest, let me know (reply all or
just to me, either is fine).
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HammockProposal
John
+1
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:22 AM Edward Zhang
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After discussion in Apache Eagle community [1][2] and IPMC mail list [3],
> please vote on the resolution proposed by Apache Eagle community below,
> which establishes Apache Eagle as top-level project at
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:38 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org>
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 3:49 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > .. should we just drop the
> > current "policy" document and make the guides the pol
>
> > Am 30.11.2016 um 12:42 schrieb John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>:
> >
> > December 2016 Incubator report timeline:
> >
> >https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2016
> >
> >Wed December 07 -- Podling reports due by end of
December 2016 Incubator report timeline:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2016
Wed December 07 -- Podling reports due by end of day
Sun December 11 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day
Sun December 11 -- Summary due by end of day
Tue December 13 -- Mentor signoff
practice.
>
> Line 4 includes "my personal bias". Whose bias is that? Is that bias
> now policy, or is it still just a personal opinion?
>
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 7:35 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at
All,
Based on some of the feedback received, i think we should start putting
together some revisions to the Incubator's policy document. The document
in reference is at
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html
- Acceptance by Incubator
Rephrase the first few lines as:
If
All,
Based on some variations in process, there's some initial talk to moving
podling bootstrapping from an infra standpoint to a dedicated form. This
form would potentially gather:
- Podling name
- JIRA
- Confluence
- Mailing lists
- Git Repositories
- Travis CI
- Coveralls
other things as
The discussion has moved to legal-discuss. I would encourage everyone to
join the discussion there
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/db78e1f8fc121d8e6b016d2f61d06ccafebf9fd30b4ec00883c78557@%3Clegal-discuss.apache.org%3E
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 3:11 PM Tom Barber wrote:
since its protected the master in case of a bad release needing
to get re-rolled (I personally hate the unnecssary -RC# that projects push
out)
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:44 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > IMHO, the tags on github are not formal releases
IMHO, the tags on github are not formal releases. The fact that github
marks it as a release is just an unfortunate side effect of how github
works. So its not a violation of ASF release process. May be good to
start a discussion on legal-discuss. Let me know if you're subscribed, we
can talk
t page?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Craig
>
> > On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:20 PM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> >
> > This vote passes with 10 binding +1's, 3 non-binding +1, and no -1's
> >
> > Binding:
> > John D. Ament
> > Bertrand Delacretaz
1 Lewis John McGibbney (Incubator PMC binding)
> +1 Jochen Wiedman (Incubator PMC binding)
> +1 John D. Ament (Incubator PMC binding)
> +1 Ted Dunning (Incubator PMC binding)
>
> +7 positive binding votes, no negative votes.
>
> The vote has PASSED at Incubator PMC (and at Commons PMC
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 10:19 PM Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 6:16 AM, John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 6:04 PM Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> O
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 6:04 PM Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 4:06 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 4:57 PM Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri,
I blended Bertrand's improved form with the remaining information from that
section and got this:
Lists eligible (and willing) individuals nominated as Mentors [definition]
for the candidate.
Three Mentors gives a quorum and allows a Podling more autonomy from the
Incubator PMC, so the current
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 4:57 PM Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 8:26 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >...
>
> > Graduation Guide http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html
> >
> > Added a l
role until the proposal is accepted.
>
> And if a mentor comes along after acceptance, then I think it is enough for
> the podling to accept that person, as long as they are on IPMC there is no
> need to do any formal appointment beyond updating the right files. (an ASF
> Membe
All,
I'm planning to start committing a number of website changes. These
changes are a summary of my experience bootstrapping podlings, questions
I've received (both on and off mailing list) from people trying to do
setup, and ways to leverage new infra services.
Here's a summary of the current
All,
I was wondering if someone could help me clarify this block of text. This
is the section I believe is at an issue:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#template-mentors
*It is common for additional Mentors to volunteer their services during the
development of the proposal. The
+1 . I would recommend inlining the licenses rather than making them
external. But that's a small preference thing.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 11:14 PM Kam Kasravi wrote:
> Hi IPMC Community
>
> The PPMC vote to release Apache Gearpump (incubating) 0.8.2-RC2 has passed.
> We
+1
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 5:47 PM Edward J. Yoon
wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> I would like to call a vote for accepting "Weex" for incubation in the
> Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. We ask the
> Incubator PMC to sponsor it, with myself (Edward J.
That's an issue. Want to let them know directly that their website needs
fixing?
On Nov 24, 2016 1:00 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > RE Justin - that's a potential issue, but is also how github works.
>
> It may be how GitHub works but it is IMO against
Hmm thought I voted +1 already
RE Julian's concerns - the artifact includes "incubating" so that passes
the incubator requirement. The requirement doesn't say that it has to
include it in the pom's version.
RE Justin - that's a potential issue, but is also how github works. Since
they're doing
Understood. There's a discussion on legal-discuss you may want to join in
on. The current ruling is that you would have until April 30 2017 to
remove the dependency.
John
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 9:19 AM Karl Wright wrote:
> The Apache ManifoldCF project got an official
in the proposal:
>
> "
> The initial committers are employees of eBay Inc.
> "
>
> - Henry
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 4:50 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Henry,
> >
> > Can you add initial committer affiliations to t
Henry,
Can you add initial committer affiliations to the proposal?
John
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:30 PM Henry Saputra
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As the champion for Griffin, I would like to bring up discussion to
> bring the project as Apache incubator podling.
>
> Here is
Sounds good to me.
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 4:54 PM Edward J. Yoon
wrote:
> Okay, if there is no more feedback then I'll send out a VOTE thread
> tomorrow.
> :-)
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>
> -Original Message-
> From: hedh...@gmail.com
+1 yes please graduate into a subproject (I'm still not sure what the
process looks like, if there's anything actually required)
John
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 8:49 AM Stian Soiland-Reyes
wrote:
> [Note: this is the IPMC vote on general@incubator - there's a
> concurrent VOTE
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:40 AM Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
> > Hi Jitendra,
> >
> > I gonna take a deeper look.
> >
> > My first feedback would be about the name: Concur is traveling/expense
the binding count based on people stating that their vote is
> > binding. Is this incorrect?
> >
> > Bruce
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:45 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Bruce
> >>
> >> Please double
Bruce
Please double check your binding list.
On Nov 21, 2016 12:24, "Bruce Snyder" <bsny...@apache.org> wrote:
> The vote passes with 38 +1 votes (5 binding) and no -1 votes. Below are the
> results:
>
> Jochen Wiedmann +1 (binding)
> Rob Davies +1
> Bertran
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:23 AM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:08 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <
> bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:31 AM, BonoLv <lvs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > ...Longda is ver
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:08 AM Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:31 AM, BonoLv wrote:
> > ...Longda is very warmhearted in helping us to learn the Apache way.
> We hope
> > his application will be successful...
>
> Experienced
I'm changing my vote to +1 since I'm able to build from source after
installing thrift.
Going through this did point out one issue - the Thrift TLP does not
publish valid releases. I've pinged them separately.
John
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 6:50 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
know, we will update. However, as the build should work on your machine
> as soon as you have thrift installed, I don't think we should cancel
> this release.
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 11/14/2016 12:00 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> > Hi,
>
t; - Henry
>
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 5:23 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> No. I voted -1. You have a +2 right now.
>
> On Nov 18, 2016 20:20, "Liang Chen" <chenliang6...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> >
No. I voted -1. You have a +2 right now.
On Nov 18, 2016 20:20, "Liang Chen" wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Finally, this vote passed with the following result:
>
> +1 (binding) : Henry Saputra,Uma Gangumalla,Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>
> Thanks all for your vote.
>
>
> Regards
>
Hey Sam,
I don't think the discussion died down. Questions were asked. I'm not
sure we got answers.
At this point, I'm +1 to accept OpenWhisk. I'm not going to block
OpenWhisk, I am going to work on the assumption that our current git
requirements are met (apache is the canonical repository).
All,
The Apache CommonsRDF podling has begun discussions within itself and with
the Commons TLP to begin the migration over into the Commons TLP as a
subproject. The incubator guides a bit limited in this aspect - I suspect
because the process is really up to the receiving TLP.
By following
issue.
John
On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:46 AM Liang Chen <chenliang6...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi John D. Ament and Henry
>
> Gentle reminder!
> Could you please check again? please feel free to let me know if need to
> provide more information.
>
> BTW,buil
Todd,
Please be cautious about mixing public/private email lists. I'm removing
impala's private based on this.
The guide that Sailesh pointed to [1] mentions the "PMC Chair" which would
be the Incubator PMC, and hence Ted Dunning. If you don't hear back, may
be best to ping him directly (I had
remove-thrift-solution-td2253.html
>
> Definitely,we will update the compile document accordingly also for the 1st
> compile users.
>
> Regards
> Liang
>
>
> John D. Ament-2 wrote
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can you please provide build instructions? It fails for
Hi,
Can you please provide build instructions? It fails for me on
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project carbondata-core: Could not
resolve dependencies for project
org.apache.carbondata:carbondata-core:jar:0.2.0-incubating: Could not find
artifact
+1 release looks great, thanks Stian!
John
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:03 PM Stian Soiland-Reyes
wrote:
> The Apache Commons RDF podling has voted to release
>
> Apache Commons RDF 0.3.0-incubating RC2
>
> Vote thread:
>
>
James,
Could you please test it locally?
Run "ant" from the root directory, then open up
target/site/projects/metron.html in a browser.
John
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 4:52 PM wrote:
> Author: jsirota
> Date: Fri Nov 11 21:51:48 2016
> New Revision: 1000984
>
> Log:
>
Feel free to edit, it's still not submitted.
On Nov 11, 2016 15:42, "P. Taylor Goetz" <ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote:
Yeah, they pulled their report, but their still listed in the “Summary of
podling reports” section.
-Taylor
> On Nov 11, 2016, at 3:34 PM, John D. Ament <
>
> -Taylor
>
> > On Nov 11, 2016, at 8:12 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > I'll be submitting this report in a couple of hours, on behalf of the
> > IPMC. I don't see any changes, but I will grab the c
All,
I'll be submitting this report in a couple of hours, on behalf of the
IPMC. I don't see any changes, but I will grab the current copy from
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2016 .
John
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 9:12 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
On Nov 10, 2016 17:40, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
> > wrote:
> >>...
> >
> >> It just comes from my own experience of
On Nov 10, 2016 15:05, "Roman Shaposhnik" <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 3:40 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
wrote:
> > In addition, I'm a bit confused over the role you're expecting Ted to
fill
> > on this one.
That and update podlings.xml
On Nov 10, 2016 15:04, "Josh Elser" wrote:
Actaully, I should probably ask: is there any sort of formal process we
need to go through to officially add a new mentor on a podling? Or, simply
add her name to
ating-src.zip.asc
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.md5
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.sha
> >
> >
> > There is also a blocking jira that we are working for future releases.
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-926
> >
> &
Hi,
Probably not a good idea to inline the reports, usually we just see links
to whimsy. Here's Metron's -
https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/Metron.html
John
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:30 PM wrote:
> Author: jsirota
> Date: Thu Nov 10 19:30:31 2016
> New Revision:
+1
On Nov 10, 2016 11:41, "Bruce Snyder" wrote:
> Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I would like to call a vote on
> accepting RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator
> [ ] +0 Abstain.
> [ ] -1 Do not accept RocketMQ
se find it on
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2016
>
> We apologize for being late.
>
> Thanks,
> Makoto
>
> 2016-11-09 13:06 GMT+09:00 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>:
> > All,
> >
> > Below is the current draft of the board rep
In addition, I'm a bit confused over the role you're expecting Ted to fill
on this one. When I read
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#top-level-board-proposal it
seems like anyone can submit the resolution to the board. The board may
discuss it, they may be quiet about it.
I
Hongxu:
Please reach out to the HAWQ podling directly. Either a PPMC member or a
mentor can help you.
John
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:34 AM Hongxu Ma wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I dived into HAWQ recently, wish to share some ideas to wiki (e.g. build
> and install), and assign
Roman,
Here's where I sent out the experiment idea to the group -
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/927db43fa0221bcf862088d495be2d15ce433c4bd20f4de8715bb8ae@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
There's actually been quite a few colorful conversations about this on
hipchat with infra. Ranging
, 2016 at 10:37 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> Is this test runtime normal?
>
> Running org.apache.streams.monitoring.tasks.BroadcastMonitorThreadTest
> Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time e
e, and execute streams out of modules.
>
> It looks like your issue stems from not running `mvn install` on
> streams-master prior to streams-project.
>
> Running `mvn clean install` on each in order should result in BUILD
> SUCCESS.
>
> Steve
>
> On November 9, 2016 at
to the infra team for replacing the moin-moin wiki server
quickly, avoiding much impact on this months report.
* Miscellaneous
- None
* Credits
- Report Manager: John D. Ament
Summary of podling reports
* Still getting started at the Incubator
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 9:08 PM Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:19 AM, vongosling wrote:
> > Hi, Guys:
> >
> > I have revised a little about RocketMQ proposal, adding some text to
> focus
> > our design attention about RocketMQ. Also,
ct-0.4-incubating johnament$
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 9:08 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 11:51 AM sblackmon <sblack...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Incubator PMC,
>
> The Apache Streams community has voted and approved the proposal to
> re
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 11:51 AM sblackmon wrote:
> Hi Incubator PMC,
>
> The Apache Streams community has voted and approved the proposal to
> release Apache Streams 0.4 (incubating).
>
> We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members to review and vote on this
> incubator
Done, happy editing!
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 8:03 PM Jitendra Pandey
wrote:
> My Wiki user account name is JitendraPandey, and email:
> jiten...@apache.org .
> Could you please grant me write access to the Incubator Wiki?
>
> Thank you
> jitendra
>
>
server
quickly, avoiding much impact on this months report.
* Miscellaneous
- None
* Credits
- Report Manager: John D. Ament
Summary of podling reports
* Still getting started at the Incubator
- AriaTosca
- Guacamole
- Hivemall
- iota
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 7:58 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > This is a page about Gemfire, not Geode.
>
> Sure but it’s based on / use Apache Geode right?
>
> > the ones you're pointing to are the old ones.
>
> So it might be a good idea to point people to the right
Cos,
Did you mean this section?
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community
John
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 5:41 PM Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Besides, last time I checked there's no such thing as "diversity
> requirement"
> in the graduation. It is indeed
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Tuesday, 8 November 2016, 22:36, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > It was probably a gremlin, I see prior edits from you as well.
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 8, 20
lse lost edit
rights, please shoot an email to get readded.
John
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:35 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> It was probably a gremlin, I see prior edits from you as well.
>
> John
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:32 PM Henry Saput
It was probably a gremlin, I see prior edits from you as well.
John
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:32 PM Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Ah, interesting, I was able to review prev incubator reports.
>
> Thanks, John!
>
> - Henry
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 8,
Well that explains it. You weren't on the contributors group - I've added
you.
John
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:19 PM Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I logged in. My username is Henry Saputra
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:06 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@a
Hi Deron,
Here's an example from a release I did recently for a TLP to give you some
guidance. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/deltaspike/1.7.2/ (and
i'm sure others may find some errors in what I did - no one's perfect)
In this release, for each file there are 3 accompanying files -
gt; On Saturday, November 5, 2016, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > Please find below the draft board report for the incubator for this
> month.
> >
> > John
> >
> > Incubator PMC report for November 2016
All,
Not a lot has changed in the podling report. We still have 7 podlings
missing sign off from mentors. Please review your podlings quickly and
provide them feedback.
John
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:22 AM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
>
> Please find th
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:30 PM Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:10 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > I'm +0.5 for this right now. There's some challenges I would like to see
> > answered to be able to move
I'm +0.5 for this right now. There's some challenges I would like to see
answered to be able to move forward on this.
- Who controls the ACLs? I have some strong opinions of the ACL.
Specifically, when the podling joins the incubator, I expect that the
"OpenWhisk" organization be handed over to
I sent notice.
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 10:02 PM Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> Hi,
> I (apache ID "niclas") would like to rejoin the Incubator PMC.
>
> Thanks
> --
> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java
>
I've added you, happy editing.
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 10:08 PM BonoLv wrote:
> My incubator wiki user name is "BonoLv" . Please grant write access
> permission for me .
>
> Thx.
>
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:08 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:26 PM, John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > ...- How can RocketMQ work with the existing Kafka or ActiveMQ
> communities to
901 - 1000 of 1833 matches
Mail list logo