Paul Fremantle wrote:
I think the PPMC needs this sort of concrete feedback.
And perhaps needs to consider that diversity means supporting a broader
community of interests.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
For the record, I am voting -1 on graduation.
I do not feel that Tuscany has sufficient real diversity,
at this time, for graduation.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Oct 20, 2007, at 2:58 AM, Paul Fremantle wrote:
Noel
Wouldn't the community be healthier if it focused some effort on
bringing
in
independent committers?
Its my understanding that the project is very focussed on
encouraging new
committers and that this is having results.
In
Thanks for voting. I think the PPMC needs this sort of concrete feedback.
Paul
On 10/22/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 20, 2007, at 2:58 AM, Paul Fremantle wrote:
Noel
Wouldn't the community be healthier if it focused some effort on
bringing
in
independent
On 10/22/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 20, 2007, at 2:58 AM, Paul Fremantle wrote:
Noel
Wouldn't the community be healthier if it focused some effort on
bringing
in
independent committers?
Its my understanding that the project is very focussed on
I would refer people to the
Re: Graduation: how do we check three or more independent
committers ?
thread, and message ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
Noel
There is a vote in progress on a new committer right now. Does that count?
I'm certainly keen on doing integration between Synapse and Tuscany and as
soon as I get a minute I will do it. I agree that cross-fertilization is
good.
Paul
On 10/21/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The recent Tuscany 1.0 release included Ode integration with an
implementation.bpel component type. We also have experimental support
for integration with Geronimo.
In the last 2 months, 3 new committers have been added, one is in progress
as Paul has said, and one is being discussed. Of these
On 10/19/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Fremantle wrote:
I think Tuscany is ready to graduate because:
1) I understand it to have met the base requirements of the IPMC in
terms
of
independent committers
Apparently a bare minimum, with very little active work from
On 10/20/07, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/20/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...This is the Tuscany community vote result thread which was only on
the
tuscany-dev list but seems to have inadvertently been replied to to the
general@ list
BTW, that
On 10/12/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Tuscany podling respectfully requests the Incubator to consider its
graduation to a Top Level Project.
While incubating Tuscany has made 14(!) releases, voted in 19 new
committers, survived conflicts, formed its PPMC, learned how to govern
Ant Elder wrote:
Apparently a bare minimum, with very little active work from
independents?
If the bare minimum is the 3 legally independent committers as defined
in
the Incubator policy documents then Tuscany has more than the bare
minimum -
and thats active committers.
Can you compare
On 10/21/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ant Elder wrote:
Apparently a bare minimum, with very little active work from
independents?
If the bare minimum is the 3 legally independent committers as defined
in
the Incubator policy documents then Tuscany has more than the
On Oct 21, 2007, at 10:52 AM, ant elder wrote:
On 10/21/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ant Elder wrote:
Apparently a bare minimum, with very little active work from
independents?
If the bare minimum is the 3 legally independent committers as
defined
in
the Incubator
On 10/20/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Fremantle wrote:
Wouldn't the community be healthier if it focused some effort
on bringing in independent committers?
Its my understanding that the project is very focussed on encouraging
new committers and that this is
Noel
Wouldn't the community be healthier if it focused some effort on bringing
in
independent committers?
Its my understanding that the project is very focussed on encouraging new
committers and that this is having results.
Paul
--
Paul Fremantle
Co-Founder and VP of Technical Sales, WSO2
On 10/19/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't use [RESULT] in a thread that is still on-going. There may
have been a result in the Tuscany PPMC, but there is no result yet from
the
Incubator PMC.
This is the Tuscany community vote result thread which was only on the
On 10/20/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...This is the Tuscany community vote result thread which was only on the
tuscany-dev list but seems to have inadvertently been replied to to the
general@ list
BTW, that message says
...given the muddied waters how about waiting a little
nt elder wrote:
The Tuscany podling respectfully requests the Incubator to consider its
graduation to a Top Level Project.
While incubating Tuscany has made 14(!) releases, voted in 19 new
committers, survived conflicts, formed its PPMC, learned how to govern
itself, resolved licensing issues
Paul Fremantle wrote:
Wouldn't the community be healthier if it focused some effort
on bringing in independent committers?
Its my understanding that the project is very focussed on encouraging
new committers and that this is having results.
Where? It seems to me that if it were having
Please don't use [RESULT] in a thread that is still on-going. There may
have been a result in the Tuscany PPMC, but there is no result yet from the
Incubator PMC.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Fremantle wrote:
I think Tuscany is ready to graduate because:
1) I understand it to have met the base requirements of the IPMC in terms
of
independent committers
Apparently a bare minimum, with very little active work from independents?
However, I agree that there is a strong
+1 ; )
On 10/18/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hope you've all see whats going on with our vote over on Incubator
general:
http://marc.info/?t=11919162302r=1w=2
Looks like we've found some words most people are happy with:
...establish a Project Management Committee charged
On 10/18/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks pretty good to me.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tuscany as a top level
Looks good to me.
Kelvin.
On 18/10/2007, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/17/07, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I wonder if we could shorten this just a little. How about:
...establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation
and maintenance of
Folks,
ant elder wrote:
On 10/17/07, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I wonder if we could shorten this just a little. How about:
...establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation
and maintenance of open-source software for distribution at no charge
to the public,
Seems ok with me too.
- Venkat
On 10/17/07, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
...establish a Project Management Committee charged with the
creation and maintenance of open-source software for distribution
at no charge to the public, that simplifies the
On 10/13/07, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...+1 for graduation, with these two edits
Not sure if the vote is still going, but considering the current
discussions and uncertainty about community diversity, I change my
vote to a +0.
IMHO, our current 3 independent committers
On Oct 15, 2007, at 12:06 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Noel
I've expressed some concern before about diversity and independence
[1]. At the time, 11 out of 12 members proposed for the TLP's PMC
worked for a single organization. Since then, a couple more people
have been added but the ratio
On 10/17/07, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I wonder if we could shorten this just a little. How about:
...establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation
and maintenance of open-source software for distribution at no charge
to the public, that simplifies the
It looks pretty good to me.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tuscany as a top level project
On 10/17/07, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Folks,
ant elder wrote:
snip
Having both the last two sentences start This software will... doesn't
sound perfect to me so if we are able to move the for distribution at no
charge... bit up to the top that seems better, which gives:
...establish a Project Management Committee charged with the
Mike Edwards wrote:
Folks,
ant elder wrote:
snip
Having both the last two sentences start This software will... doesn't
sound perfect to me so if we are able to move the for distribution
at no
charge... bit up to the top that seems better, which gives:
...establish a Project Management
...establish a Project Management Committee charged with the
creation and maintenance of open-source software for distribution
at no charge to the public, that simplifies the development,
deployment and management of distributed applications built as
compositions of service components, where the
Luciano Resende wrote:
...establish a Project Management Committee charged with the
creation and maintenance of open-source software for distribution
at no charge to the public, that simplifies the development,
deployment and management of distributed applications built as
compositions of
On 10/13/07, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/13/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/13/07, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
So bringing together all the comments so far gives something like:
...establish a Project Management Committee
On Oct 13, 2007, at 10:07 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Ant,
Are there any issues that should be pointed out, such as the
(hopefully)
mechanical licensing header issue in stdcxx, or community
diversity, which
at least in part is measuring independence from corporate backing
(a popular
Jeremy
Neither of the two independents
are active in the core project areas of Java SCA or SDO (they are
committing to the C++ implementation or to DAS).
Is it stated somewhere that the Java SCA/SDO components are core compared
to C++ and DAS?
Taking a quick sample of the mailing list, the
On Oct 15, 2007, at 8:02 PM, Paul Fremantle wrote:
Jeremy
Neither of the two independents
are active in the core project areas of Java SCA or SDO (they are
committing to the C++ implementation or to DAS).
Is it stated somewhere that the Java SCA/SDO components are core
compared
to C++
I was thinking primarily of people who were on the TLP PMC proposal.
But yes, you and Matthew did help draft that proposal.
I also took part in some other discussions.
As the
diversity sub-thread was taken to the private list (which is kind of
ironic in itself) there may also have been
On 10/15/07, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Taking a quick sample of the mailing list, the only contributors to
the discussion thread on Graduation, which I would assume would have
been a hot topic, were from the vendor.
I remember contributing to discussion on Graduation.
Noel
Just an aside. Synapse implements a number of standards, and is not limited
to SOAP/WSDL. We have simple samples that take CSV files from FTP and
publish pure XML/JMS. I also think that ServiceMix would like to say they do
more than JBI.
Paul
On 10/13/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Agreed. This is why we have avoided putting JBI in the ServiceMix TLP charter.
In addition, ServiceMix may provide support for SCA in the future, has
JBI and SCA are not incompatible at all (this may be done leveraging
some parts of Tuscany, but not necesseraly, as the only interesting
bit of
On 10/12/07, Matthieu Riou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 on graduation, with the two edits proposed by Mike...
+1 for graduation, with these two edits.
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
On 10/12/07, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
snip
On 10/12/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
2. grrr SOA! i'm unclear what this really means in this case. though
i've been following the lists for quite a while now, i still find it
really
On 10/13/07, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/12/07, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
snip
On 10/12/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
2. grrr SOA! i'm unclear what this really means in this case. though
i've been
On 10/13/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/13/07, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
So bringing together all the comments so far gives something like:
...establish a Project Management Committee charged with the
creation and maintenance of open-source software
On 10/13/07, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/13/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/13/07, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
So bringing together all the comments so far gives something like:
...establish a Project Management Committee
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
Tuscany will implement relevant open standards including ...
As previously noted, the core standards for Tuscany are SCA and SDO, with
others as desired by the community. What distinguishes Tuscany from
ServiceMix from Synapse is:
Tuscany: SCA / SDO
Ant,
Are there any issues that should be pointed out, such as the (hopefully)
mechanical licensing header issue in stdcxx, or community diversity, which
at least in part is measuring independence from corporate backing (a popular
thread this past month)? It seems that the latter should be well
The Tuscany podling respectfully requests the Incubator to consider its
graduation to a Top Level Project.
While incubating Tuscany has made 14(!) releases, voted in 19 new
committers, survived conflicts, formed its PPMC, learned how to govern
itself, resolved licensing issues and an active
+1 from me (IPMC and Mentor)
Paul
On 10/12/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Tuscany podling respectfully requests the Incubator to consider its
graduation to a Top Level Project.
While incubating Tuscany has made 14(!) releases, voted in 19 new
committers, survived conflicts,
On 10/12/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
some grammar queries
Establish the Apache Tuscany project:
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's
purpose to establish a Project
+1 (IPMC and ex-Mentor :)
-- dims
On 10/12/07, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 from me (IPMC and Mentor)
Paul
On 10/12/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Tuscany podling respectfully requests the Incubator to consider its
graduation to a Top Level Project.
While
snip
On 10/12/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Establish the Apache Tuscany project:
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's
purpose to establish a Project Management Committee
55 matches
Mail list logo
