Hi,
The report has been submitted and incubator report wiki page made read only. If
you need to make any last minute changes before the board meeting please use
whimsey. [1]
Thanks,
Justin
1. https://whimsy.apache.org/board/agenda/2020-02-19/Incubator
--
HI,
> Could you elaborate on that a bit more? Note that since the incubator
> report is public, discussing issues that may have come up on the private
> list could be a bit awkward.
Which is why i didn’t elaborate on it here. That info would go into a private
section.
> There's 6 podlings who
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 11:23 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’m a little behind on sorting out my first incubator board report and I’m
> just abut to hop on several planes and trains (30+ hours travel) to get to
> a conference.
>
> I can see we have a bit to report this
Hi,
I’m a little behind on sorting out my first incubator board report and I’m just
abut to hop on several planes and trains (30+ hours travel) to get to a
conference.
I can see we have a bit to report this month, with a number of releases and a
number of new projects coming into the
hem a few more hours
> > to signoff the report.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yanping
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndam...@apache.org ]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 4:32 PM
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
>
e hours
> > to signoff the report.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yanping
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndam...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 4:32 PM
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> >
: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Final draft of the Incubator Board Report - April 2016
>
> I'm a bit curious about how we should handle Mnemonic. I've received no
> response thus far from the podling. I'd rather not kick them out of the
> monthly repo
urs to
> signoff the report.
>
> Thanks,
> Yanping
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndam...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 4:32 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Final draft of the Incubator Board Report
PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Final draft of the Incubator Board Report - April 2016
I'm a bit curious about how we should handle Mnemonic. I've received no
response thus far from the podling. I'd rather not kick them out of the
monthly report.
John
On Mon, Apr
I'm a bit curious about how we should handle Mnemonic. I've received no
response thus far from the podling. I'd rather not kick them out of the
monthly report.
John
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:28 PM Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:56 AM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
> > Below i
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:56 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Below is the final draft of the board report.
The report looks good to me! Comments inline.
> - Airflow
> - Gearpump
> - Mnemonic
> - Omid
> - Tephra
>
> * Graduations
>
> The board has motions for the following:
>
> - Apex
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 6:13 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Got it. If you're having issues with the wiki, I'd be happy to tick your
> name for you (since we have email confirmation).
I edited the wiki on Upayavira's behalf.
Marvin Humphrey
-
Got it. If you're having issues with the wiki, I'd be happy to tick your
name for you (since we have email confirmation).
John
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 8:52 AM Upayavira wrote:
> Regarding Wave, I'm happy to sign off the report, just didn't get time
> and got stuck regaining access to my wiki a
Regarding Wave, I'm happy to sign off the report, just didn't get time
and got stuck regaining access to my wiki account given slow responses
from Moin. And yes, if Wave continues in the incubator, it really could
do with more mentors.
Upayavira
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016, at 11:56 AM, John D. Ament wro
All,
Below is the final draft of the board report. Remember, mentors have until
tomorrow end of day to sign off on podlings. We have two podlings with no
sign offs - Mnemonic and Wave. Wave is especially concerning since its
just Upyavira now.
I've extended the months of the non-reporting podl
I guess the Wave project missed the report. Can you guide us on how do we
fill in the report now?
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:24 PM John D. Ament wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:14 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> > Hi John,
> >
> > > I've moved the podlings that had no report submitted to non-repor
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:14 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> > I've moved the podlings that had no report submitted to non-reporting and
> > marked them as monthly. I'm especially concerned about iota and Johnzon,
> > one a brand new podling (maybe they shouldn't have reported this month?
Hi John,
> I've moved the podlings that had no report submitted to non-reporting and
> marked them as monthly. I'm especially concerned about iota and Johnzon,
> one a brand new podling (maybe they shouldn't have reported this month?)
JFYI Iota has been slow to start up I’m not sure they would h
I've moved the podlings that had no report submitted to non-reporting and
marked them as monthly. I'm especially concerned about iota and Johnzon,
one a brand new podling (maybe they shouldn't have reported this month?)
and the other a podling that was trying to graduate. I'll reach out to
those
Hi all,
I have some things I'm going to wrap up tonight. But below is the current
draft report. I notice that there are still many missing podlings.
- Atlas
- Htrace
- iota (new podling)
- Johnzon (just raised a graduation vote)
- OpenAz
- Ranger
- Sirona
- Wave
I'd like to hear from these pod
Also committed to the June agenda and all updates committed back to the
wiki.
Incubator PMC report for June 2015
The Apache Incubator is the entry path into the ASF for projects and
codebases wishing to become part of the Foundation's efforts.
With 4 new podlings and no graduations, the Incubat
Over the past month, there has been a lot of discussion within the
Incubator. We have voted in a new PMC Chair, Jukka Zitting, who will be
rotating out of the PMC Chair position of JackRabbit.
There has been a lot of discussion over the future of the Incubator. Under
one proposal, the Board woul
Jukka Zitting wrote on Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 17:20:41 +0100:
> Their next status report is due in March; looking forward
> to a summary then.
They're free to send an out-of-cycle report in February if they
want to...
-
To unsubs
Hi,
Some further followup on this.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>> 2008-08-19 PhotArk
>>
>> S: Zero recent activity.
>> R: Terminate.
>
> I contacted photark-dev
Hi...
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What's the status of this effort?
>
> I went through all the older-than-year podlings identified by Sam for
> a quick (i.e. incomplete) review of the project status. See below for
> my summary (S) and subjective recommendation (
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> On Thursday, January 12, 2012 3:00:41 PM Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> I contacted stonehenge-dev@, asking them to retire or come up with a
>> plan to revive the project. No mentors visible (6 listed).
>
> We already had the vote to retire it:
>
On Thursday, January 12, 2012 3:00:41 PM Jukka Zitting wrote:
> The status of Kato (in relation to Oracle's actions) is being
> evaluated. Ant is helping the community.
>
> >> 2008-11-19 Stonehenge
> >
> > S: Zero activity.
> > R: Terminate.
>
> I contacted stonehenge-dev@, asking them to retire
Hi,
Following up on projects where my recommendation was an unconditional
"Terminate".
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> 2008-08-19 PhotArk
>
> S: Zero recent activity.
> R: Terminate.
I contacted photark-dev@, asking for
Please trim your quotes when replying, thanks.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:27 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 12 January 2012 06:09, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> Cordova
>
> Does not appear to mention anywhere that the previous name was
> Callback which is a strange omission.
The renaming was mentioned already in the December report.
Anyway, for clar
On 12 January 2012 06:09, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> A number of substantive issues came up during the past month.
>
> First, and although it was raised on the private list and therefore details
> won't be part of the public report, we advise the Board that there is
> substantial discussion regardin
On Jan 11, 2012, at 10:39 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
>> -
>>
>> Any23
>>
> ...
>> Yes, all of the code has been ported from Google Code to the ASF.
>> Thanks to Daniel Shahaf and Michele Mostarda for leading the
>> charge here.
>
> To cla
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012, at 01:09, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Below are podling reports. Sam Ruby has already reviewed the original list
> prior to posting, and requested that specific posts not be provided to the
> Board, as he was unhappy with their status:
>
> Kato: has been in limbo for years
A number of substantive issues came up during the past month.
First, and although it was raised on the private list and therefore details
won't be part of the public report, we advise the Board that there is
substantial discussion regarding changing the Incubator VP, which has been
held for almost
Since this thread has come back to life, I read through it and have
one comment to add:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 20:27, Benson Margulies wrote:
>...
> I can see two problems with this view to begin with. One is IP
> management. The more people participate in a project and the longer
> they do so,
Just an FYI: I have posted a status update on Etch on general@, hoping
it doesn't fall on deaf ears with all the discussions going on:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201201.mbox/%3ccab63y-dsjkbkeljkhuvkbdlmsjwvfvixo0fnxexofhq1v4m...@mail.gmail.com%3e
Martijn
On Sun, J
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I went through all the older-than-year podlings identified by Sam for
> a quick (i.e. incomplete) review of the project status. See below for
> my summary (S) and subjective recommendation (R) for each project.
Excellent work! This i
Hey Jukka,
On Jan 8, 2012, at 4:46 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> 2010-02-21 SIS
>
> S: Last activity in November
> (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-sis-dev/20.mbox/browser)
> R: Retire unless activity picks up in Q1.
As a SIS mentor I'd say this is fair, but my personal gut
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> 2008-01-06 RAT
>
> S: Looking to graduate but stuck with (self-inflicted?) bureacracy.
> R: Push to graduate within Q1.
Rat is stalled on trademarks
Robert
-
To unsubs
Hi,
What's the status of this effort?
I went through all the older-than-year podlings identified by Sam for
a quick (i.e. incomplete) review of the project status. See below for
my summary (S) and subjective recommendation (R) for each project.
Please branch any followup discussion about specifi
We've all been aware that the Incubator has been growing more than
graduating, over the years. Last month, Sam started a discussion regarding
being more proactive and pushing projects out of the nest, basically one way
or another, after a year. A real issue is pushing out those really ready to
gr
> Our next report is due in December, not October.
Nu? So where is it?
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Wednesday, November 30, 2011, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
On 2011-11-16 21:53, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> ...I am one of the mentors for NPanday. We did not provide a report this
> month. We apologize for this...
> Do you want us to report next month instead?
I'd say yes, report at the next opportun
On 2011-11-16 21:53, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am one of the mentors for NPanday. We did not provide a report this
> month. We apologize for this.
>
> Like Stefan I cannot seem to find the handy reminder e-mail that usually
> comes on the first day of the reporting month. Neither in my in
Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> For now on, Marvin which sends the reminder Emails to the PMCs
> will also send reminders to all the PPMCs (via their *-dev@ lists)
> as well as the summary to IPMC.
>
> It's crucial the that
> http://incubator.apache.org/report_due_[123].txt
> page be up to date and
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
We are, however, recognizing that we've had growth is
On Nov 20, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
>
>> Maybe I've had been using a high bar with the podlings I
>> mentor/participate. I'll look into graduating couple podlings after I
>> come back from Thanks Giving : Apache PhotArk, Ap
On 16/11/2011, at 12:36 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> My personal perspective is
> that incubation shouldn't generally take more than a year. That
> doesn't mean that there won't be exceptions, and in a few rare cases,
> some that go well beyond that arbitrary time limit, but the point is
> that those s
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> Maybe I've had been using a high bar with the podlings I
> mentor/participate. I'll look into graduating couple podlings after I
> come back from Thanks Giving : Apache PhotArk, Apache Wink.
First things first - can you get Wink's copyrig
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>
>> We are, however, recognizing that we've had growth issues of our own. As
>> David Crossley pointed out, he made mistakes last month related to the
>> Reporting Schedule, and we cont
For now on, Marvin which sends the reminder Emails to the PMCs
will also send reminders to all the PPMCs (via their *-dev@ lists)
as well as the summary to IPMC.
It's crucial the that
http://incubator.apache.org/report_due_[123].txt
page be up to date and correct since Marvin still pulls t
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>> > http://people.apache.org/~rubys/incubator-by-age
>>
>> I think there are more tools like this around... i think it makes
>> sense to somehow link them on the incubato
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Sam Ruby
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Looking at the current list of projects, we have many that exceed that
> >> number. Far exceed that number. In fact th
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Noel J. Bergman
> wrote:
> >>
> >> We are, however, recognizing that we've had growth issues of our own.
> As
> >> David Crossley pointed out, he made
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>
>> Looking at the current list of projects, we have many that exceed that
>> number. Far exceed that number. In fact the median age is 416 days
>> and the mean age is 536.
>
> Thanks to Gavin
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> Looking at the current list of projects, we have many that exceed that
> number. Far exceed that number. In fact the median age is 416 days
> and the mean age is 536.
Thanks to Gavin installing the necessary prerequisites on
people.apache.org
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I can see two problems with this view to begin with. One is IP
> management. The more people participate in a project and the longer
> they do so, the messier it becomes to track provenance and get ICLAs
> from all of the contributors. One
On Nov 16, 2011, at 12:36 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>
>> We are, however, recognizing that we've had growth issues of our own. As
>> David Crossley pointed out, he made mistakes last month related to the
>> Reporting Schedule, and we contin
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>>
>>> We are, however, recognizing that we've had growth issues of our own. As
>>> David Crossley pointed out, he made mistakes
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>>
>> We are, however, recognizing that we've had growth issues of our own. As
>> David Crossley pointed out, he made mistakes last month related to the
>> Reporting Schedule, and we cont
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011, Sam Ruby wrote:
Meanwhile, I will personally focus on JSPWiki. If others wish to join
me, here is a a current list of projects that have been incubating
more than a year:
I've been meaning to try to help out with JSPWiki for a while, but I've
not yet had the time. If ther
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
> wrote:
>> Hi...
>>
>> The idea sounds good in general more specifically that should be clear
>> and documented on the incubator site for future incubating projects. But,
>> IMHO, we should
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
wrote:
> Hi...
>
> The idea sounds good in general more specifically that should be clear
> and documented on the incubator site for future incubating projects. But,
> IMHO, we should categorize projects mentioned in that list from very old t
While I agree that it's important to confront the current inventory, I
think that the situation at hand is as much a matter of what goes into
the incubator as what comes out.
In my limited experience, size and growth are a big barrier to
graduation. If a project is chugging along exhibiting good A
Hi...
The idea sounds good in general more specifically that should be clear
and documented on the incubator site for future incubating projects. But,
IMHO, we should categorize projects mentioned in that list from very old to
recent ones and each group of mentors get in touch with their mentor
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I have been working to get Empire-DB to graduate, and I expect to have
> a vote in front of general@ quite soon.
>
Same with Bean Validation the vote on the dev list is already done and next
steps will be taken soon. I take the blame for
Hi...
Having automated e-mails sent as reminders is a good thing and handy
too. But, IMHO, even with having this in hand mentors *should* be following
up with their mentored projects just in case something went wrong with the
automation scripts like what happened this time, also to follow up wi
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>
> Like Stefan I cannot seem to find the handy reminder e-mail that usually
> comes on the first day of the reporting month. Neither in my inbox nor
> the dev-list archive.
As explained here early this month, the automated reminder
failed because there was an extra board m
Sam Ruby wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> >
> > We are, however, recognizing that we've had growth issues of our own. As
> > David Crossley pointed out, he made mistakes last month related to the
> > Reporting Schedule, and we continue to have issues. The Incubator is almost
> > as big as the re
I have been working to get Empire-DB to graduate, and I expect to have
a vote in front of general@ quite soon.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 5:17 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 16 November 2011 20:57, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Christian Grobmeier
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Deltacloud has gradu
On 16 November 2011 20:57, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>>
>> Deltacloud has graduated and can be put off from your list.
>> Rat is discussing graduation and should be moved from the list too.
>
> The master list from which I drew the data can be
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>>
>> Deltacloud has graduated and can be put off from your list.
>> Rat is discussing graduation and should be moved from the list too.
>
> The master list from which I drew the data
Actually I checked and could not find a reminder for Zeta dev too.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am one of the mentors for NPanday. We did not provide a report this
> month. We apologize for this.
>
> Like Stefan I cannot seem to find the handy reminder e-mail
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
>
> Deltacloud has graduated and can be put off from your list.
> Rat is discussing graduation and should be moved from the list too.
The master list from which I drew the data can be found here:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/
T
On Wednesday, November 16, 2011 9:48:02 PM Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> > Meanwhile, I will personally focus on JSPWiki. If others wish to join
> > me, here is a a current list of projects that have been incubating
>
> > more than a year:
> On t
Hi
I am one of the mentors for NPanday. We did not provide a report this
month. We apologize for this.
Like Stefan I cannot seem to find the handy reminder e-mail that usually
comes on the first day of the reporting month. Neither in my inbox nor
the dev-list archive.
Do you want us to report ne
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Excellent plot chart. As with most plot charts, the end result is a
> Rorschach test. I'll tell you what I (personally) see in this chart:
> a failure to perform garbage collection. My
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
> We are, however, recognizing that we've had growth issues of our own. As
> David Crossley pointed out, he made mistakes last month related to the
> Reporting Schedule, and we continue to have issues. The Incubator is almost
> as big as
This time were 7 reports missed (leaving out S4):
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 5:41 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Amber
> HISE
> Kalumet
> Lucene.NET
> NPanday
> Zeta Components
> Stonehenge
> SHOULD BE RETIRED.
I am a Mentor of Zeta. This time I have not had the time to push the
report. A pity, nobo
Notwithstanding the fact that members of the Board are active within the
Incubator, there are no issues requiring Board attention or intervention.
We are, however, recognizing that we've had growth issues of our own. As
David Crossley pointed out, he made mistakes last month related to the
Report
Weird ... that was posted to my output queue on Monday. :-( No big deal.
Just a clarification that Wave wasn't missing.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional comman
Most of the general discussion on the Incubator list over the past month was
how to improve the usability of the Incubator web-site.
S4 (Simple Scalable Streaming System) -- a general-purpose, distributed,
scalable, partially fault-tolerant, pluggable platform that allows
programmers to easily dev
Brian LeRoux wrote:
> > Brett Porter wrote:
> >
> > ... Also, it seems Callback isn't scheduled to first report until December
> > - was that a mistake on the schedule page or a deliberate decision by the
> > mentors?
>
> I believe this was deliberate while we sorted out the infrastructure
> mov
On Oct 24, 2011, at 8:37 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> On 25/10/2011, at 9:02 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
>> With respect ot an early version of the report, there was confusion as to
>> which podlings needed to report this month, but we appear to have it
>> straightened out. The Wiki page had a
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> On 25/10/2011, at 9:02 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
> > With respect ot an early version of the report, there was confusion as to
> > which podlings needed to report this month, but we appear to have it
> > straightened out. The Wiki page
> I removed Wave from the bottom as it reported last month, but Imperius,
> JSPWiki, and Kitty appear to be missing according to the reporting schedule.
> Also, it seems Callback isn't scheduled to first report until December - was
> that a mistake on the schedule page or a deliberate decision b
On 25/10/2011, at 9:02 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> With respect ot an early version of the report, there was confusion as to
> which podlings needed to report this month, but we appear to have it
> straightened out. The Wiki page had a few too many projects loaded onto it.
I removed Wave from
Most of the general discussion on the Incubator list over the past month was
how to improve the usability of the Incubator web-site.
S4 (Simple Scalable Streaming System) -- a general-purpose, distributed,
scalable, partially fault-tolerant, pluggable platform that allows
programmers to easily dev
Correct,
Hama reported in September, also the 'usual' reminder didn't reach out the
hama-dev@ ML.
Tommaso
2011/10/18 Michael Fitzner
> I think some projects are wrong scheduled for the „October 2011
> Incubator Board Report“ The current schedule plan
> http://w
ould expect the 16th
to be the date for Nov PMC reports to be submitted,
but just an educated guess.
From: Noel J. Bergman
To: general@incubator.apache.org; Joe Schaefer
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 4:48 PM
Subject: RE: October 2011 Incubator Board Report
K
ut just an educated guess.
>
>From: Noel J. Bergman
>To: general@incubator.apache.org; Joe Schaefer
>Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 4:48 PM
>Subject: RE: October 2011 Incubator Board Report
>
>> Keep in mind the board meeting isn't until
> Keep in mind the board meeting isn't until
> next week, so there's still time to address
> the missingreports.
<> We had the meeting date wrong, too. When did October move to the
4th week? And I have no idea when the November meeting will be, since there
are two dates in there (7th and 16th).
Hi,
The Kato project reported in Secptember, as per our schedule. Our next
report is due in December, not October.
regards,
Stuart
On 18/10/11 18:05, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
-8
ETCH, HAMA, HCATALOG (managed to do a release, though), KATO, MANIFOLDCF
(also managed to do a release, tho
ManifoldCF is also listed as March, June, September, and December on
the referenced page.
Karl
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Michael Fitzner
wrote:
> I think some projects are wrong scheduled for the „October 2011
> Incubator Board Report“ The current schedule plan
> http://wiki.a
I think some projects are wrong scheduled for the „October 2011
Incubator Board Report“ The current schedule plan
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule shows that projects
like Etch, Hama, Hcatalog are in the months March, June, September,
December and not in October. It would be
ject: October 2011 Incubator Board Report
>
>Most of the general discussion on the Incubator list over the past month was
>how to improve the usability of the Incubator web-site.
>
>S4 (Simple Scalable Streaming System) -- a general-purpose, distributed,
>scalable, partially
Most of the general discussion on the Incubator list over the past month was
how to improve the usability of the Incubator web-site.
S4 (Simple Scalable Streaming System) -- a general-purpose, distributed,
scalable, partially fault-tolerant, pluggable platform that allows
programmers to easily dev
Bluesky was retired by vote of the Incubator PMC. The project just never
managed to adjust to the ASF's community-orientation.
Olio likewise seems prime for retirement.
HISE (Human Tasks for WS-BPEL) again failed to report (that was an issue in
February as well). Activity has picked up aomewhat
The Incubator PMC now totals 143 members, with some additional requests
(joining and a resignation) pending. Recent changes include Peter Royal and
Phil Steitz (pending) dropping off; and Shane Curcuru, Srinath Perera,
Nicolas Lalevee, Marvin Humphrey, Michael McCandless, Nigel Daley, Tommaso
Teof
Incubator Report May 2011
The Incubator continues to accept and graduate projects a pace. This month
we have two new projects, one retirement (with two more likely), and one
graduation.
Imperius has voted to retire. Others are likely to follow (see below).
LibCloud is proposed for graduation t
1 - 100 of 224 matches
Mail list logo
