On Wednesday, September 2, 2015, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm adding some shepherd notes for ODF Toolkit. I think my main concern is
> lack of mentor participation on the project. Rob Weir (I swear every time
> I type his name I type the d) ha
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 6:25 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> I'd like to bring to your attention the ODF Toolkit podling.
>
> This podling has been incubating for over 4 years now. Last month they
> filed a report without mentor sign off, without any feedback on the
Please vote
+1 for accepting corinthia into incubator
0 for dont care
-1 for not accepting corinthia into incubator (please add a reason).
+1 (binding)
.
.
.
== Initial Goals ==
The initial and most important goal is to enlarge the community consisting
of developers, testers, and
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Svante Schubert
svante.schub...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm a developer and an incubator PMC member and desire access to the
incubator Wiki.
Can somebody please give me (user svanteschubert) access to the Wiki (in
particular the incubator report [1]) so I am
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Nick Burch apa...@gagravarr.org wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014, Justin Mclean wrote:
This VOTE has now been going on for more than a month. Anyone able to help
out here?
I thought the vote had passed?
Yes. The [VOTE][RESULT] post is here:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014, at 12:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On 24 Jun 2014, at 7:24, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:22 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
I think its not enough to
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Marvin Humphrey
mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
No other votes were received so the release is approved.
Congratulations, and many thanks to the Apache ODF Toolkit podling for
sticking it out
RC4 for the ODF Toolkit 0.6.1-incubating release is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~robweir/odftoolkit-release/odftoolkit-0.6.1-incubating/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/odf/tags/odftoolkit-0.6.1-incubating-RC4/
I looked around and did not see a process defined for adding a Mentor
to a podling. I see how they are added at podling initiation, but not
after. So apologies if I'm missing something.
It appears that we have at present zero active Mentors, so even with
the experimental release process we're
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
The process is described here:
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
Please vote:
[ ] +1 Yes, to pre-clear the ODF Toolkit Polding to use the Alternate
Release Voting Process
[ ] -1
The process is described here:
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
Please vote:
[ ] +1 Yes, to pre-clear the ODF Toolkit Polding to use the Alternate
Release Voting Process
[ ] -1 No, do not pre-clear the ODF Toolkit Polding to use the
Alternate Release
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
I'll upgrade my vote to +1 (binding)
That gives us two +1's from the IPMC. Need one more to release.
I realize many are busy (including me
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
We've had a vote within the PPMC which passed:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-odf-dev/201402.mbox/%3CCAP-ksogUFy-OkDkdJcNYDjnn8wUf%3DxcJX%2BG2xxQLKzp5PGKEgA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
We're now looking
!
-Rob
Regards,
Dave
On Mar 5, 2014, at 10:53 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Rob, the result Vote within PPMC [1] did not indicate mentor Vote.
Is there any mentor Vote in favor within ODF dev list Vote thread
is interested, pleased let us know at odf-...@incubator.apache.org
Regards,
-Rob
Thx,
- Henry
[1]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-odf-dev/201402.mbox/%3CCAP-ksogUFy-OkDkdJcNYDjnn8wUf%3DxcJX%2BG2xxQLKzp5PGKEgA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:07 AM, Rob Weir
We've had a vote within the PPMC which passed:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-odf-dev/201402.mbox/%3CCAP-ksogUFy-OkDkdJcNYDjnn8wUf%3DxcJX%2BG2xxQLKzp5PGKEgA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
We're now looking for review and approval by the IPMC.
Regards,
-Rob
--
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Florian Hopf
mailingli...@florian-hopf.de wrote:
Hi Joe,
thanks for your feedback. This is my first release and only the second
release of the Odftoolkit so I am glad to get some guidance on things we
missed so far.
On 18.05.2013 20:41, Joe Brockmeier
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:41 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 May 2013 07:04, Florian Hopf mailingli...@florian-hopf.de wrote:
Hi all,
The ODF Toolkit 0.6 is ready for release.
We had a successful vote in the PPMC. The PPMC vote result is here:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 4:23 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 25/01/2013 Benson Margulies wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
What about Apache OpenOffice?
I asked this question about Open Office, and I got, more or less, what
I typed in above.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the reviews, Benson! I added you as a signer-off on these reports.
As reported and discussed, Kafka remains ready to graduate and will
hopefully complete that transition shortly.
On Fri, Oct 5,
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the reviews, Benson! I added you as a signer-off
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
FYI - This is being done in public!
Who or what is an RGB.ES? Don't PMC members have to disclose an identity?
All committers must disclosure
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Aug 27, 2012, at 8:56 AM, donald_harbi...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Yes, that's what end users care about. But it's not sufficient for AOO
since we are seeking alternative distribution channels.
What does that mean? Can I
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:56 AM, donald_harbi...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote on 08/27/2012 08:43:35 AM:
From: Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org, Joe Schaefer
joe_schae...@yahoo.com, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org,
Cc: ooo
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 27, 2012 6:15 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm jumping in late to this discussion after returning from vacation.
To summarize my understanding:
* As Joe says, there's no problem with current
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Re adding ooo-dev@ since this is STILL an AOO issue.
On Aug 27, 2012, at 9:38 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Aug 27, 2012, at 8:56 AM
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 26.08.2012 13:15, Tim Williams wrote:
Marvin gave the link earlier in this thread. 4th para is the relevant bit.
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what
The relevant part is in the last paragraph. However, that says
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Aug 26, 2012, at 7:46 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
AOO doesn't need to change anything to their current release processes
other than to stop pointing source downloads at svn (which is the sole
reason I won't vote for AOO
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Or if someone who cared sufficiently about this policy area took
ownership and proposed a wording of the policy, either as a Board
resolution
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
snip
I can give the IPMC a hand here, if my point is too obscure. A policy
might look like this:
Resolved: An Apache project's release consists
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Marvin Humphrey
mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
Returning to this topic after an intermission...
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Marvin Humphrey
mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
Returning to this topic after an intermission...
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Aug 24, 2012, at 9:32 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
Returning to this topic after an intermission...
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:54
The community vote has passed.
Vote reference: http://s.apache.org/5GA
+1
RGB-ES
Rory O'Farrell
Carl Marcum
Reizinger Zoltan
Keith N. McKenna
Kay Schenk
Roberto Galoppini
Imacat
Andrea Pescetti
Regina Henschel
Graham Lauder
Jürgen Lange
T.J. Frazier
Rob Weir
Dave Fisher
Peter Junge
Christian
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/21/12 8:14 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
In my mind as an IPMC member and Apache Member, this is a source release
VOTE with convenience
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Thilo Goetz twgo...@gmx.de wrote:
On 21/08/12 13:59, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 21.08.2012 12:52, sebb wrote:
I think the NOTICE problems are serious enough to warrant a respin.
This is an unreasonable request. The IPMC voted on the 3.4.0 release.
The notice file
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Thilo Goetz twgo...@gmx.de wrote:
On 21/08/12 13:59, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 21.08.2012 12:52, sebb wrote:
I think
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Marvin Humphrey
mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:59 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
It is fair to require changes for the next release. It's not fair to use
different criteria for two successive, essentially identical releases.
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Per the IPMC's Guide to Successful Graduation [1] this is the
optional, but recommended, community vote for us to express our
willingness/readiness
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote:
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating)
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Do not release this package
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Per the IPMC's Guide to Successful Graduation [1] this is the
optional
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:03 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
Well, for myself, I don't have a problem with the AOO project not having
official binary releases - in such a circumstance I would strongly
prefer no
investment into the ecosyste,
Regards,
-Rob
Regards,
-Rob
Cheers,
-g
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
On Sun
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:59 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 17:01 -0700, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:03 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
Well, for myself, I don't have a problem with the AOO project not having
official binary releases - in
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 20, 2012 8:33 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I would also state that continuing to argue is symptomatic of a
failure to understand
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 20, 2012 8:33 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I would also state
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com
wrote:
I'm sorry, I'm playing catch-up and I'm a bit unclear on the argument -
Marvin said: If the podling believes that ASF-endorsed binaries are a
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Officially, no Apache project has ever, ever, released a binary.
Apache projects have published convenience binaries to accompany their
releases, which have been, by definition, source.
Maybe you can help clarify
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
Date: Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:52 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote
To: ooo-...@incubator.apache.org
Per the IPMC's Guide to Successful Graduation [1] this is the
optional, but recommended
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 2:59 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 19:43 +0100, Nick Kew wrote:
On 23 Jun 2012, at 19:37, Nick Kew wrote:
Nor what appears on planet.apache.org, featuring the article that first
struck me
as using the name in a way I wouldn't expect
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 3:55 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 15:42 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 2:59 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 19:43 +0100, Nick Kew wrote:
On 23 Jun 2012, at 19:37, Nick Kew wrote:
Nor what
The Apache OpenOffice Podling Project Management Committee is pleased
to announce the release of Apache OpenOffice 3.4, available on
Windows, MacOS and Linux.
Downloads are available at: http://download.openoffice.org
The full release announcement can be read here:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
PS: the specific svn revisions here are not the central point, the
point is the lack of any discussion/scrutiny on any of these followed
by the self-fulfilling prophecy: To be released the code must be
clean.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:43 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Short of people.a.o/~luser/my-patch.tgz, I'm fairly certain that
can't happen with an incubating podling. Everything under the
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I don't think the problem is with the size of the ooo-security list
membership. I think it is in the assumption that the [P]PMC has somehow
delegated the ability to make a release of any kind to the
would have addressed these concerns if the security team
gave them a heads up a day or two earlier. Or a week earlier.
Evidently even a month is not even enough.
-Rob
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 09:46
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Apr 12, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Yes, this was already raised on the PPMC (on March 22) as you know. It
seems to me that the PPMC is not concerned.
It is interesting that it is thought, here,
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:43 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 3/31/2012 8:43 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.comwrote:
There isn't (to my knowledge), I can imagine an increasing number of
projects wanting
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 2:08 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 March 2012 17:38, Leo Simons m...@leosimons.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:42 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 29 March 2012 18:43, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
On Mar 29, 2012, at 6:17 PM, Marvin
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.comwrote:
There isn't (to my knowledge), I can imagine an increasing number of
projects wanting such a thing though. Unless someone tells me I'm
wrong and we already have one would you be interested in seeing if
Apple are
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
On Mar 27, 2012, at 12:57 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
[dropped infra@, I believe most interested people are already on
general@]
Let's decouple this thread from the specific issue of the ManifoldCF
release.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Marvin Humphrey
mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
2012/3/13 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com:
we have prepared a new developer snapshot on the way to our first release.
Congratulations on your progress so far!
And thanks for reviewing out dev snapshot
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'll be cutting over the incubator site to
svnpubsub based on the CMS this coming Monday.
Please be advised this will impact the workflow
for publishing stuff: instead of committing build
output to site-publish and
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
=0 (abstain, non-binding [;) from me.
With a different build configuration, I have matching results to the
successful builds reported by others. I don't know enough to interpret the
outcome or the
2011/12/27 Devin Han devin...@apache.org:
Hi all,
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache ODF Toolkit
(incubating) version 0.5. This will be the first incubator release for
ODF Toolkit in Apache.
This release candidate fixes the pom.xml file inconsistant issue found in
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:34 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com
seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to clarify if Non-English Mailing lists are allowed.
Background: I missed in our Proposal the Mailing List:
http://groups.google.com/group/openmeetings-en-espanol/about?hl=en_US
We made now
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, 22 October 2011 8:03 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: timeline of Apache Incubator history
On Fri, Oct 21
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 2:57 AM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Please see
http://incubator.apache.org/history/
This is a Timeplot chart of the number of projects
handled by the Incubator.
The green line shows the Count podlings
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:03 AM, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Please see
http://incubator.apache.org/history/
This is a Timeplot chart of the number of projects
handled by the Incubator.
The green line shows the Count podlings entered incubation.
The yellow line shows the
2011/8/9 Ying Chun Guo guoyi...@cn.ibm.com:
Nick Burch nick.bu...@alfresco.com 写于 08/09/2011 06:47:05 PM:
Nick Burch nick.bu...@alfresco.com
08/09/2011 06:47 PM
Please respond to
general@incubator.apache.org
To
general@incubator.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Accept ODF
Devin noticed that we have our first status report due to the Apache
Board tomorrow (Wed). But we don't have an Apache mailing list to
discuss this yet.
So, I've pasted Devin's draft into the wiki. You can review it here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2011Search for
ODFToolkit.
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 7:05 AM, Nick Burch nick.bu...@alfresco.com wrote:
On Sun, 31 Jul 2011, Sam Ruby wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
As the discussions on the ODF Toolkit threads seem to be winding down,
I would like to initiate the vote to
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Yegor Kozlov yegor.koz...@dinom.ru wrote:
Can we do this for now? If anyone is committed to the project and
able to contribute, please respond to this note with some indication
of your
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept ODF Toolkit for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to ODF Toolkit incubation
[ ] -1 Reject ODF Toolkit for incubation
+1
Regards,
-Rob
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ODFToolkitProposal
This proposal was sent to the Apache Incubator list a week ago. It
was suggested that the PDFBox and Tiki projects should be contacted as
well, to make members aware of this proposal.
If you have comments, please follow up to
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 5:26 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 on the proposal
But comment though on the mailing lists you asked for, I updated them,
so would you please take a look. In brief the changes are:
1- You missed adding odf-private@ which is for Podling
-
From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 08:03
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] ODF Toolkit for Incubation
On Jul 21, 2011, at 7:10 AM, Andy Brown wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Andy Brown
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jul 21, 2011, at 7:10 AM, Andy Brown wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Andy Brown a...@the-martin-byrd.net
wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
And I've added it to the wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org
2011/7/22 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com:
Hi Rob,
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net
wrote:
On Jul 21, 2011, at 7:10 AM, Andy Brown wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jul 21, 2011, at 7:10 AM, Andy Brown wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Andy Brown a...@the-martin-byrd.net
wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
And I've added it to the wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Andy Brown a...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Andy Brown a...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
And I've added it to the wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ODFToolkitProposal
-Rob
What can I do
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Andy Brown a...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
And I've added it to the wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ODFToolkitProposal
-Rob
What can I do to help?
Good question. Once the project is set up, there will be many areas
where we would
tracker
A wiki
A website
==Initial Committers==
Rob Weir
Biao Han
Svante Schubert
Ying Chun Guo
==Sponsors==
===Champion===
Sam Ruby
===Nominated Mentors===
Nick Burch
Yegor Kozlov
===Sponsoring Entity===
The Apache Incubator
And I've added it to the wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ODFToolkitProposal
-Rob
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
Apologies to those who have received multiple copies of this message.
I've cc'ed members of the Apache POI project, the Apache OpenOffice
We continue to discuss moving this work to Apache. Feedback so far
has been to try for an eventual TLP. We're starting to draft the
Incubation proposal. We talked to the maintainer of the C#/AODL
component and he confirmed that it is not really active anymore. He
might move it to bitbucket.
And I was thinking of the Ray Ozzie, the former Microsoft CTO.
Elephant handler is perhaps apt.
-Riob
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:22:39AM +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
You might want to reconsider the name.
In
a Java library but also other languages
(e.g. Python, the existing C#, etc.).
Juergen
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
I'm cc'ing the POI and OpenOffice projects, inviting them to join this
discussion on the Incubator general list: general@incubator.apache.org
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 20:51:53 -0400:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name
wrote:
Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 19:00:50 -0400:
Hi Dennis,
If I
the questions.
-Rob
Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)
On 27 Jun 2011, at 20:42, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
I'm cc'ing the POI and OpenOffice projects, inviting them to join this
discussion on the Incubator general list: general@incubator.apache.org
When we were
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Lee Fisher blib...@gmail.com wrote:
There is activity. It just is not evenly distributed.
[...]
I presume the activity is more in the Java libraries. :-)
I not asking you to presume anything. I'm just following up on
interest expressed on this list a few
governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*
/
-Original Message-
From: rabas...@gmail.com [mailto:rabas...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rob Weir
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 12:43
To: general
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 19:00:50 -0400:
Hi Dennis,
If I understand correctly, the practice at Apache would be to remove
these legacy copyright statements and aggregate them into a single
NOTICE
92 matches
Mail list logo