/util/IdentityHashMap.html
[4]
http://ws.apache.org/axis/java/apiDocs/org/apache/axis/utils/IdentityHashMap.html
[5]
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/collections/apidocs-COLLECTIONS_3_1/org/apache/commons/collections/map/IdentityMap.html
ps: Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Ceki Gülcü
For
ceki2004/01/22 13:01:07
Modified:xdocs/site mail.xml mail2.xml
docs/site mail.html mail2.html
Log:
Removed references to log4j mailing lists
PR:
Obtained from:
Submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Revision ChangesPath
1.32 +3 -4
ceki2003/12/22 11:24:39
Modified:docs .htaccess
Log:
Added a redirection from log4j/ to logging.apache.org/log4j
PR:
Obtained from:
Submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Revision ChangesPath
1.13 +3 -0 jakarta-site2/docs/.htaccess
Index
At 08:42 AM 12/20/2003 -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Dec 20, 2003, at 8:40 AM, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
Subsequent to the demand for the TRACE level expressed by a number of
user, there is every reason to believe that a vote will be held on this
topic before log4j 1.3 is released. However, there
still time as log4j 1.3
will not be released in the immediate future.
--
Ceki Gülcü
For log4j documentation consider "The complete log4j manual"
ISBN: 2970036908 http://www.qos.ch/shop/products/clm_t.jsp
--
ubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Ceki Gülcü
For log4j documentation consider "The complete log4j manual"
ISBN: 2970036908 http://www.qos.ch/shop/products/clm_t.jsp
---
lidays to all,
--
Ceki Gülcü
For log4j documentation consider "The complete log4j manual"
ISBN: 2970036908 http://www.qos.ch/shop/products/clm_t.jsp
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional c
Greetings to all,
I just wanted to bring your attention to the fact that there
are only 17 days left for registering at ApacheCon US/2003!
--
Ceki Gülcü
For log4j documentation consider "The complete log4j manual"
ISBN: 2970036908 http://www.qos.ch/shop/products/clm_t.jsp
olors nicely.
-Original Message-
From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 2:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: JSP editor for Eclipse
Hello all,
I am looking for a JSP editor for Eclipse. Any recommendations on this
front?
--
Ceki Gülcü
For
Hello all,
I am looking for a JSP editor for Eclipse. Any recommendations on this front?
--
Ceki Gülcü
For log4j documentation consider "The complete log4j manual"
ISBN: 2970036908 http://www.qos.ch/shop/products/clm_t.jsp
import org.apache.Facetime;
ApacheCon US 2
you to be a part
of it!
Hyper-Early bird registration fee: US$499
After 30 September: US$599
After 20 October: US$799
After 16 November: US$899
Register today at http://www.apachecon.com/
We look forward to seeing you there!
- Sally Khudairi
--
Ceki Gülcü
For log4j documentation co
ceki2003/09/15 12:01:14
Added: docs/images/logos ac2003-150.gif
Log:
150x86 advert icon for AC 2003.
PR:
Obtained from:
Submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 jakarta-site2/docs/images/logos/ac2003-150.gif
ceki2003/09/15 11:58:13
Modified:xdocs/stylesheets site.vsl
Log:
Added visible link to Ac 2003.
PR:
Obtained from:
Submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Revision ChangesPath
1.32 +4 -0 jakarta-site2/xdocs/stylesheets/site.vsl
Index: site.vsl
The page
http://www.apachecon.com/2003/US/html/travel.html
should be be updated soon.
At 01:42 PM 9/15/2003 -0500, you wrote:
At which hotel is ApacheCon?
-dain
On Monday, September 15, 2003, at 01:29 PM, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
Registration Opens for ApacheCon 2003, the Global Hub for All Things
/
You can find the press release at:
http://www.marketwire.com/mw/release_html_b1?release_id=57498
--
Ceki Gülcü
For log4j documentation consider "The complete log4j manual"
ISBN: 2970036908 http://www.qos.ch/shop/products/clm_t.jsp
import org.apache.Facetime;
Apache
ceki2003/09/05 05:01:02
Modified:xdocs/stylesheets site.vsl
Log:
Removed link to AC2003 as requested by Sally Khudairi in order to
allow more time for preparation of the event.
PR:
Obtained from:
Submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Revision ChangesPath
1.31
rly as
possible.....
On 9/4/03 12:13 PM, "Ceki Gülcü" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If I am not mistakem, early-bird registration seems to be already over...
Anyway, I added a link at the top of the jakarta sidebar menu. I am
confident people will find things to improve but you'
Glenn Nielsen wrote:
+1 But wait until the sessions are available at www.apachecon.com
Ceki Gülcü wrote:
Hello everyone,
Apachecon 2003 will take place in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, 16-19
November 2003.
For this event to be the success that it deserves to have, we need to
make an effort to publicize
ceki2003/09/04 08:31:54
Modified:xdocs/stylesheets site.vsl
Log:
Added an ApacheCon 2003 US icon at the top of the sidebar menu.
The outcome might not be elegant but it's the best I could manage.
PR:
Obtained from:
Submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Rev
ceki2003/09/04 07:07:34
Added: docs/images/logos ac2003-M.gif
Log:
Added AC2003 icon
PR:
Obtained from:
Submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 jakarta-site2/docs/images/logos/ac2003-M.gif
://www.ApacheCon.com. The icons are available at
http://www.apache.org/~ceki/ac2003/
We should at least add a salient image on the sidebar of the jakarta
pages.
Comments?
--
Ceki Gülcü
For log4j documentation consider "The complete log4j manual"
ISBN: 2970036908 http://www.qos.ch/sho
ceki2003/08/10 10:40:34
Modified:xdocs/site whoweare.xml
docs/site whoweare.html
Log:
Updated my bio as well as Shawn Bayer's upon his request.
PR:
Obtained from:
Submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Revision ChangesPath
1.91 +
Here are some OSP rules that might be of interest:
http://www.advogato.org/article/395.html
Enjoy!
--
Ceki For log4j documentation consider "The complete log4j manual"
ISBN: 2970036908 http://www.qos.ch/shop/products
y developer I know who has a say on the platform uses
JBoss: better product, better documentation, better support, lower
price.
Do you think Sun Microsystems cares one bit about the well being of
Open Source? The fact that Sun is actively trying to scuttle a
successful OS project, JBoss in this case
... Mark Fleury _is_ evil.
He has a character but evil? A bit harsh no?
Pier
--
Ceki For log4j documentation consider "The complete log4j manual"
ISBN: 2970036908 http://www.qos.ch/shop/products/clm_t.jsp
-
Hi Robert,
I think Mark's nomination follows the sprit set by Sam's initial note.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-general&m=104275438831116&w=2
As such, I don't see a need for a separate vote.
At 22:16 19.02.2003 +0000, you wrote:
hi ceki
wouldn't it
Fumagalli
- Ceki Gülcü
- Dmitri Plotnikov
- Phillip Rhodes
To add to the list, I'd like to nominate these active committers:
- James Strachan
- Jason van Zyl
- Ted Husted
- Rod Waldhoff
+1
I'd like to add Mark Womack to the list of candidates.
- Sam Ruby
e at which people become committers. But I would like to see
significantly more Jakarta committers become PMC and ASF members.
+1
By the way, when are the next membership nominations?
- Sam Ruby
--
Ceki
-
To unsubscri
D license. Understand its sprit. Read the Apache license. See
how much or how little it differs.
I would encourage general discussion of this on [EMAIL PROTECTED] This
topic has a much wider applicability than Jakarta.
Sure.
- Sam Ruby
--
Ceki
-
oard@apache in order to
solicit clarifications and/or corrections. If you do not hear of any
such changes in the next few days, please treat this as official ASF policy.
- Sam Ruby
--
Ceki
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE
user base is large and
growing. As time passes, more people will gravitate to it as it keeps
improving. We have enough cool features in pipe to keep us busy for
the foreseeable future. Simile, the future is bright and open!
Daniel
--
Ceki
This one surely will become a classic:
http://www.unitedmedia.com/comics/dilbert/archive/dilbert-20030109.html
--
Ceki
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
es the community months or
even years to realize that the idea was bad. Of course, the problem
does stem from the open nature of the ASF but rather from the
imperfections of *any* conceivable system. The bottom line is that we
should not mistake the failings of the system with our own PGL
syndrome (pa
At 12:23 09.12.2002 +0100, Steven Noels wrote:
Ceki Gülcü wrote:
- things being 'easier' when being a member: of course not, and I hope
that wasn't the impression that I gave
The message I was trying to get across was that the "firewall"
a.k.a. barrier between memb
nd an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and see how you are
received. Note the CC: to licensing@.
--
Steven Noels http://outerthought.org/
--
Ceki
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At 05:52 05.12.2002 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote:
Ceki Gülcü wrote:
Would a shut-up-and-think-for-yourself be any better? It seems to me that
you are seeking an explicit sanction for the practice of using the current
license by reference.
Yes, shut-up-and-think-for-yourself would be better assuming
you,
the ASF, nor anyone on the board. What is going on here?
Craig McClanahan
--
Ceki
TCP implementations will follow a general principle of robustness: be
conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from
others. -- Jon Postel, RFC 793
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <m
At 07:31 04.12.2002 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote:
Stefan Mainz wrote:
Ceki Gülcü wrote:
I do not understand what Roy means by "the scope of what was covered
beyond 'this file'" Copyright law only protects the expression of an
idea, so I am baffled by what is meant by the scope b
At 12:02 04.12.2002 +0100, Stefan Mainz wrote:
Ceki Gülcü wrote:
I do not understand what Roy means by "the scope of what was covered
beyond 'this file'" Copyright law only protects the expression of an
idea, so I am baffled by what is meant by the scope beyond the file,
At 12:13 04.12.2002 +0100, you wrote:
Ceki Gülcü wrote:
At 11:06 04.12.2002 +0100, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
IANAL and not the one to decide.
IIRC IIUC the board, &&|| board members have said to use the full
version till version 2.0 arrives.
Well, as far as I know, there is no permi
on this
topic, one should not make absolute statements.
Yes, it is theoretically safer to include the license in each file, but
including a copyright notice followed by reference to the license
should be good enough (because it makes sense.)
Mvgr,
Martin
--
Ceki
TCP implementations will
position on this, or until there is an official
document on this topic, one should not make absolute affirmations.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Ceki
TCP implementations will follow a general principle of robustness: be
conservative in what you do, be liberal in
a reference to
the license? The whole world does it. Why shouldn't we?
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Ceki
TCP implementations will follow a general principle of robustness: be
conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from
others. -- Jon P
tively that this is against ASF rules, I will move to rectify
> the situation.
Roy Fielding and several other board members have repeatedly stated
that the short version is not acceptable IIRC. License 2.0 is
supposed to help.
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
l-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:general-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
--
Ceki
TCP implementations will follow a general principle of robustness: be
conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from
others. -- Jon Postel, RFC 793
--
gt;
>--
>StudioZ.tv /\ Bar/Nightclub/Entertainment
>314 11th Street @ Folsom /\ San Francisco
> http://studioz.tv/
--
Ceki
TCP implementations will follow a general principle of robustness: be
conservative in what you do, be liberal in what you accept from
others. -- Jon Postel, RFC
various
versions. To which Ceki replied by stating [2] the current policy of
not removing deprecated methods until at least two release cycles are
completed. This reply did not seem to satisfy John Armstrong and a
long discussion ensued. A historical perspective [3] seemed to satisfy
most people, at l
At 10:07 25.05.2002 -0400, you wrote:
>Ceki Gülcü wrote:
> >
> > The motivational power of appreciation cannot be underestimated. The
> > author is correct in emphasizing the point. What is not emphasized
> > enough is the need for direction. What's the use of ha
f having a million
volunteers if they all pull in different directions?
>- Sam Ruby
--
Ceki
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
s unnecessary when you have a
close and trusting relationship with the other developer(s) although
establishing trust takes time. It does not happen overnight.
>- Sam Ruby
--
Ceki
ps: By the way, the idea of submitting a patch as a committer is not
mine. It's yours (Sam's).
--
To un
the reasons for his liberal policy (for
granting commit access). I tend to oscillate between a liberal policy
and a conservative one. A discussion on this topic is very well deserved imho.
>Costin
--
Ceki
ps: The tomcat developers should complete the vote on Dan's
candidacy. His candida
At 09:32 16.05.2002 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>On Thu, 16 May 2002, Ceki Gülc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The log4j developers would like log4j bug report related emails to
> > also appear on the log4j-dev mailing list. Can this be done?
>
>All that ne
Bug Database. Please use this
database report bugs and suggest new features. To suggest a new
feature, set the severity of the bug to "enhancement". In case of
problems with the Apache Bug Database, please notify
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks in advance, Ceki
--
To unsubscri
Here is my enthusiastic but non binding +1.
At 14:41 29.04.2002 -0400, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I would like to propose ObjectRelationalBridge
>(http://objectbridge.sourceforge.net/) as a top level subproject of
>Jakarta.
--
Ceki
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMA
At 00:07 13.04.2002 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Ceki [iso-8859-1] Gülcü wrote:
>
> > The results of a recent vote show that the log4j community has strong
> interest
> > in the donation. Is there a document that I can present to the donator for
. Correct? To whom do I
(or the donator) send the signed document? Thanks in advance, Ceki
At 23:58 11.04.2002 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>There are several reasons why this needs a contributors license (assuming
>people want the code)
--
Ceki
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mail
Your explanation is crystal clear. I'll organize a vote on the
donation just to make sure that we really want the code. Thanks again, Ceki
At 23:58 11.04.2002 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Ceki [iso-8859-1] Gülcü wrote:
>
> > A commercial company, a
License) to the log4j-dev list, can we then
consider that
the contribution is "just" a large patch?
Any clarification on this matter would be greatly appreciated.
--
Ceki
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ome rule about being part of the
JDK 1.4 umbrella JSR which apparently changes things. (Don't
ask me why.)
--
Ceki
My link of the month: http://java.sun.com/aboutJava/standardization/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
takes the development of good software for granted. It takes
a lot of
energy and time. We waste much of it bickering among ourselves. Initially I was
very saddened by this but now have grown accustomed to it. I do not expect
to change anyones's mind. I am pretty sick of the politics and hav
are warmed up and all systems are
>configured properly. That should drop the difference even more in theory.
--
Ceki
My link of the month: http://java.sun.com/aboutJava/standardization/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
f the story? You are essentially right if the user knows what
she is doing.
It would be interesting to see if changing
private Category category = null;
to
final private Category category;
in org.apache.commons.logging.impl.Log4JCategoryLog would
change anything. It would be a nice experiment.
At 12:46 29.03.2002 +11
willing to use Jakarta projects will *have* to use the
>Jakarta logger. Sound M$-ish, doesn't it?
>
>Last solution : everyone stands where they are: pro-choice vs. pro-one-logger.
>
>-Vladimir
>
>--
>Vladimir Bossicard
>www.bossicard.com
--
Ceki
My link of the mont
At 16:56 28.03.2002 -0800, you wrote:
>On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
>
> > I think you have done a pretty good job on the log4j wrapper. However,
> > I am pretty stretched out as it is, so I can't really help with something
> > I don't particularly lik
At 00:57 29.03.2002 +0100, Paulo Gaspar wrote:
>Ceki,
>
>What about making clear that commons-logging is only supposed to be
>used by other components so that the application developer picks
>the logging API that suits him best?
That seems to be the intent of commons-logging. I h
y or think won't matter.
At 15:17 28.03.2002 -0800, you wrote:
>On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
>
> > True. It does encourage it, but only initially. On the long run,
> > however, people will run into problems with their logging (as is
> > happening now). They wi
I am trying to say is that I would have liked
to see jakarta present a more united front. Well, too bad...
--
Ceki
My link of the month: http://java.sun.com/aboutJava/standardization/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ind. Just as importantly, log4j documentation
is going to get a massive boost with the upcoming log4j book.
Sun's me-too strategy is bound to fail. The question is whether the
bigger jakarta community is going to help us defeat JSR47 or stand in
the way.
--
Ceki
My link of the month: http://j
At 15:10 28.03.2002 -0600, Morgan Delagrange wrote:
>Where is this world where "everyone" uses Log4J?
That world = (world - jakarta)
--
Ceki
My link of the month: http://java.sun.com/aboutJava/standardization/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For add
Costin, Morgan, Rodney,
Thanks for the lively discussion and sharing your points of view. My intent
was to warn users of the dangers of using common-logging. I have done
my bit. Cheers, Ceki
At 16:31 27.03.2002 -0600, Morgan wrote:
>I believe the order of precedence is well documented. I th
At 15:18 27.03.2002 -0600, Morgan Delagrange wrote:
>Here's the problem, as I see it.
>
>Suppose Commons component A decides to adopt Log4J, Commons component B
>decides to adopt LogKit, and Commons component C adopts JDK1.4 logging.
>They will all minimally function with the right jars in the cla
led nor even
>(necessarily) encouraged to use commons-logging. That's not what it's there
>for. It's there to allow the library components to delegate that decision
>to the containing application.
I understand your argument. I have already exposed mine. Thanks for your
attention. Ceki
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
quot;a nickel of
today for a promise of a penny tomorrow."
As long as you are aware that the supposedly free-lunch may turn out
to be an expensive and not so tasty meal after all...
--
Ceki
My link of the month: http://java.sun.com/aboutJava/standardization/
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
nk the barrier of
entry is in the difficulty implementating the spec not in the licensing.
It's going to be JBoss, Weblogic, and Webspere for a long time. As
such, BEA and IBM will be thrilled to see a lower price -- assuming the
price was high.
Again, my claims are long on speculation and s
ul for their own projects. (Those users may turn
>into contributors over time!)
>I cannot understand why Leo and Ceki refer to the document (and,
>by implication, others like it) as "Marketing" - a term which
>carries in this context clearly condescending connotations.
>I d
ults if run a
>little more like Apache projects, with more opportunity for user feedback
>in an open forum to mold the ultimate result into something useful.
>
>daniel
>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Ceki
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
09.Dec.01 (11 Entries for
>2001)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> CVS, Javadoc, Source code, Documentation management
> system, to allow you to browse multiple and remote source
> repositoriesGenerate Javadoc across multiple java
> projects.
>
>
> Documentation: Sketchy
> Version: None
> News: ;None
>
>
>
>
> Portable email server for all common formats.
> Design goals are portability, protocol abstraction,
> resource abstraction, mail transport and storage in
> single server.
>
> Documentation: Uneven
> Version: 2.0a2
> News: ;1.2.1 released 13. Dec. 00,
> 2.0a2 released 01. Dec. 01
>
>
>
>
> Information Portal, making data available
> via the web or a WAP-enabled phone.
> Jetspeed is independent of content type. The actual
> presentation of the data is handled via XSL and delivered
> to the user for example via the combination of Java Server
> Pages (JSPs) and HTML.
> Jetspeed provides support for templating and content
> publication frameworks such as Cocoon, WebMacro and
> Velocity.
> Jetspeed is built on top of Turbine.
>
> Documentation: Extensive, but unclear
> Version: 1.3a2
> News: ;Last Entry: 2002/03/15 (confusing)
>
>
>
>
> Official Reference Implementation of the
> Servlet 2.2 and JSP 1.1
>
> Documentation: Extensive
> Version: 3.3
> News: ;About bi-weekly updates
>
>
>
>
> Official Reference Implementation of the
> Servlet 2.3 and JSP 1.2
>
> Documentation: Extensive
> Version: 4.0.3
> News: ;About bi-weekly updates
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
># Document ends here #
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Ceki
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
releases up, etc.
>
>No one has taken me up on it. Via CVS is the ONLY way modifications can
>be made to our website.
Have you considered to just copy your files to the relevant directory on
the web site?
CVS is *not* necessary to manage the web site.
--
Ceki
--
To unsubscribe,
>Ceki are you sure?
>>I think we definitely need a solid document countering the
>> idyllic but false world depicted
>> by the FSF.
>
>I agree with comments you have made already, about the importance of licence
>and legal to ASF, Jakarta, and individuals involved
Hi Alex,
You are absolutely right. I thought I had this one nailed but
apparently not. Thank you for pointing out my mistake. Regards, Ceki
>> Asunto: Re: [VOTE] ASL vs. GPL page: is this okay?
>> The "Working Without Copyleft" article is remarkably good. The point
>&g
At 16:17 06.03.2002 -0600, you wrote:
>-1
>
>I'm not sure we need this at all.
I disagree. I think we definitely need a solid document countering the
idyllic but false world depicted
by the FSF. It's just a gargantuan task to come up with a such a document.
Regards, Ceki
are contrary to our
intentions. For example, they may clarify that the result of
aspect-oriented weaving is subject to the terms of the LGPL, whereas
we had intended that it is not. Another concern is who will be in
charge of the Free Software Foundation 10 years from now, or what
happens if the Free Software Foundation is discontinued? [LGPL,
section 13]
Licensing is a blackhole for time. It also happens to be central element in
open source development. Its importance cannot be overstated.
--
Ceki Gülcü
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ieve in 10 lifetimes,
yours humbly included. It is fascinating that he put so much energy in
to this copyleft vision and how far he carried it. My hat is off to RMS.
Regards, Ceki
At 22:16 05.03.2002 +1100, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Is there a page somewhere at apache.org, explaining why anyone wo
sanctioned by the Jakarta project.
I am undoing this change pending a decision by the PMC or any other
collective decision. Regards, Ceki
ps: I went away on vacation on the 23rd of February and came back just
today so I could not react earlier
The following is from http://www.ibiblio.org/java/#recent
I have a request to make of the log4j team, as well as all the other
Java programmers at the Apache Project, IBM alphaWorks, Sun, and
everyone else who distributes JAR archives. Could you please attach a
version number to all your JARs? I
ver had the pleasure of helping
>develop. It will be around for a very long time and will eventually put
>Bugzilla out of business. More info: <http://scarab.tigris.org/>
>
>thanks,
>
>-jon
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
31.01.2002 -0800, you wrote:
>"Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I nominate Ceki Gulcu to be a candidate for the PMC election.
>>
>> Ceki is the force of nature behind log4j, a member of the ASF, until
>> recently a member of the PMC,
The Java Community Process (JCP) is not a "community" process at
all. It's a way for Sun Inc. to claim they are open. You know it. I
know it. Sun knows it. Let's stop deluding ourselves shall we?
I say we move "that flaming fireball" to the home page of *Apache*.
In your opinion, what are the key factors in nurturing a developer
community?
--
Ceki
> It is very easy to monday-morning quaterback and second guess the
> decisions that were made in the distant past with perfect 20-20
> hindsight. Some might even find it amusing to single out so
the printMeta macro and an
iteration on all meta elements in $root. It's nothing much, possibly
buggy and most definitely not as elegant as it should be. (I know very
little about velocity and even less about anakia.)
I have not applied the patch pending approval. Regards, Ceki
Index:
Hi,
Could we please disable posts from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to jakarta/apache lists.
This person (or an impostor) has posted emails with
the title "new photos from my party!" to many jakarta
lists. The content of this mail is possibly a virus.
ed in using
POI? Is the slide community interested?
In addition, I don't see how a templating engine like Velocity could
use POI, but again I am not an expert on the topic.
--
Ceki Gülcü - http://qos.ch
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
fective immediately, and an
>election would be initiated.
>
>- Sam Ruby
--
Ceki Gülcü - http://qos.ch
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Micael,
I guess my remarks on typing "this" do sound arrogant.
Point well taken. Regards, Ceki
--- Micael Padraig Og mac Grene
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 07:07 PM 1/9/02 -0800, you wrote:
> >Ceki Gülcü <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > &
;
>> The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to
>> vote.
>> -Ambassador Kosh
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>-
ms to apply. Regards, Ceki
At 20:24 09.01.2002 -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>On 1/9/02 12:53 PM, "Jon Scott Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> on 1/9/02 6:49 AM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Ted Husted wrote:
&g
Done. I hope the actual patch contains less typos than
my previous mail describing the patch. :-)
--- Jon Scott Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 1/9/02 4:27 AM, "Ceki Gulcu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> &g
awating approval. Regards, Ceki
Index: xdocs/site/mail.xml
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-site2/xdocs/site/mail.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -r1.20 mail.xml
--- xdocs/site/mail.xml 8 Dec 2001 00:11:17 - 1.20
other volunteers?
Regards, Ceki
At 14:57 08.01.2002 -0500, you wrote:
>I'd say it should be the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>and if anyone, including Paulo, want to help out with the Webmaster
>emails, that would be great.
>
>Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
>>
>> I wa
...they would have struggled to survive here...
>>
>> -jon
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Ceki Gülcü - http://qos.ch
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
1 - 100 of 222 matches
Mail list logo
