On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 09:40:00AM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 08/12/2015 12:21 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 23:30:31 +1000
Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
I invite you to reproduce the problem yourself then make the
judgement. Using REQUIRED_USE like
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Alexis Ballier wrote:
i.e. something that really tells the PM how to automate the choice:
- 'qt5 - !qt4' is rather straightforward to solve and tells the PM how
(note that it is not equivalent to 'qt4 - !qt5')
- '^^ ( qt5 qt4 )' requires the PM to make a choice in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/15 09:40 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
At the very least, we need to be able to tag REQUIRED_USE
conflicts with human readable error messages. OK, so I know I
can't have USE=qt4 qt5 for this package... but why? How do I
fix it? We can do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/15 11:08 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Alexis Ballier wrote:
i.e. something that really tells the PM how to automate the
choice: - 'qt5 - !qt4' is rather straightforward to solve and
tells the PM how (note that it is
On 13/08/2015 00:21, James Le Cuirot wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 00:11:45 +0200
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/08/2015 23:29, James Le Cuirot wrote:
Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo.org writes:
On 10 Aug 2015 09:17, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-08-10, o godz. 02:42:21
2015-08-12 15:47 GMT+08:00 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org:
On 12 Aug 2015 15:20, Leno Hou wrote:
2. How to control endian difference via profiles ? i.e. *How to get
ppc64le as a full stage/profile along side ppc64* ?
Could you give me in detail ?
you probably want to create a
Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo.org writes:
On 10 Aug 2015 09:17, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-08-10, o godz. 02:42:21 Mike Frysinger napisał(a):
On 10 Aug 2015 08:28, Justin (jlec) wrote:
I like to propose to add the md5-cache into it. Which other
files are of interest?
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 00:11:45 +0200
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/08/2015 23:29, James Le Cuirot wrote:
Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo.org writes:
On 10 Aug 2015 09:17, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-08-10, o godz. 02:42:21 Mike Frysinger napisał(a):
On 10 Aug 2015
On 12/08/2015 23:29, James Le Cuirot wrote:
Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo.org writes:
On 10 Aug 2015 09:17, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-08-10, o godz. 02:42:21 Mike Frysinger napisał(a):
On 10 Aug 2015 08:28, Justin (jlec) wrote:
I like to propose to add the md5-cache into it. Which
On 12 August 2015 at 16:21, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
Can't we all (except for the usual suspect) just agree that REQUIRED_USE
was a mistake, and go back to pkg_pretend? The only justification for
REQUIRED_USE was that it could allegedly be used in an automated
On 08/11/15 10:32, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello, everyone.
Now that we're officially on git and can officially use pull
requests to provide rapid community interaction, it'd be convenient
to have a little better framework for pinging package maintainers.
With the unofficial mirror/pull
---
.../2015-08-13-openssh-weak-keys.en.txt| 26 ++
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
2015/2015-08-13-openssh-weak-keys/2015-08-13-openssh-weak-keys.en.txt
diff --git
a/2015/2015-08-13-openssh-weak-keys/2015-08-13-openssh-weak-keys.en.txt
On 13 Aug 2015 07:58, 姜渠 wrote:
2015-08-12 15:47 GMT+08:00 Mike Frysinger:
On 12 Aug 2015 15:20, Leno Hou wrote:
2. How to control endian difference via profiles ? i.e. *How to get
ppc64le as a full stage/profile along side ppc64* ?
Could you give me in detail ?
you probably
On 08/12/15 22:38, William Hubbs wrote:
I always wondered why pkg_pretend never caught on.
Because, in a way, it triggers at the wrong point of the merge.
emerge -pv fnurk = dependencies look ok
emerge fnurk = pkg_pretend bails out ... eh?!
(This would be a little bit confusing, if not
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13/08/2015 00:21, James Le Cuirot wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 00:11:45 +0200
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/08/2015 23:29, James Le Cuirot wrote:
Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo.org writes:
Someone end the bikeshed train please.
Seconded.
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 18:03:52 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Can we make it clear whether we are allowed/supposed to use the short
form:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/333531
?
I'd like this to be the preferred form. It's cleaner, the show_bug.cgi=id? is
just noise.
If we do go
On 12 Aug 2015 18:27, Brian Dolbec wrote:
2) There is another alternate location that you can define files to
ignore locally without having to commit them to .gitignore.
Consider .gitignore a global setting. There is another setting
inside .git/info/exclude which is a local config file that
On 08/12/2015 05:44 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
On 08/12/15 22:38, William Hubbs wrote:
I always wondered why pkg_pretend never caught on.
Because, in a way, it triggers at the wrong point of the merge.
emerge -pv fnurk = dependencies look ok
emerge fnurk = pkg_pretend bails out ... eh?!
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 00:22:34 +0200
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13/08/2015 00:21, James Le Cuirot wrote:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 00:11:45 +0200
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/08/2015 23:29, James Le Cuirot wrote:
Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo.org
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
---
.../2015-08-13-openssh-weak-keys.en.txt| 26
++
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
2015/2015-08-13-openssh-weak-keys/2015-08-13-openssh-weak-keys.en.txt
diff
Jason Zaman posted on Wed, 12 Aug 2015 15:38:01 +0800 as excerpted:
Tho I can definitely think of a non-traditional use for bisect.
[When a system hasn't been updated in over a year, bisect the update.]
I like the idea, but its probably easier to just git checkout $(git
rev-list -n 1
hasufell posted on Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:58:20 +0200 as excerpted:
In addition, we just took the freedom to add the clause all commits
must be repoman-valid:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/index.php?
title=Gentoo_git_workflowdiff=352978oldid=352858
That will be necessary too for the CI work mgorny
Alexandre Rostovtsev posted on Tue, 11 Aug 2015 09:13:36 -0400 as
excerpted:
On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 16:04 +0300, Sergey Popov wrote:
You want to migrate to such decision? Like:
qt? (
qt5? ( dev-lang/qtcore:5 ) !qt5? ( dev-lang/qtcore:4 )
)
Fine by me, if you would ask.
That flag
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 11 Aug 2015 10:45, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 8/11/15 10:33 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 11/08/15 06:11 AM, Leno Hou wrote:
I think ppc64le would become popular,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ppc64.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 07:20:54AM +, Duncan wrote:
hasufell posted on Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:58:20 +0200 as excerpted:
In addition, we just took the freedom to add the clause all commits
must be repoman-valid:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/index.php?
On 12 Aug 2015 15:20, Leno Hou wrote:
2. How to control endian difference via profiles ? i.e. *How to get
ppc64le as a full stage/profile along side ppc64* ?
Could you give me in detail ?
you probably want to create a new profile dir:
profiles/arch/powerpc/ppc64/little-endian/
Sergey Popov posted on Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:58:49 +0300 as excerpted:
11.08.2015 15:30, Michael Palimaka пишет:
On 11/08/15 20:10, Sergey Popov wrote:
Err, i have read the whole thread and still does not get a point, why
i am wrong.
You clearly have not. The reasoning behind Qt team's
On 8/12/15 3:47 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
4. I would like become a developer of porting gentoo on ppc64le. Anyone
could help/mentor me to join this project ?
ideally someone on the ppc side would pick you up, but i think they've been
a bit of a skeleton team of late. so if need be, i can
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:17:10 +0200 hasufell wrote:
On 08/11/2015 08:34 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
commit: 719cc5ef240b766953ddbe1e7a6593f8091eed12
Author: Mike Frysinger vapier AT gentoo DOT org
AuthorDate: Tue Aug 11 06:28:16 2015 +
Commit: Mike Frysinger vapier AT gentoo
2 cents from me in case of connection with contributions on github:
- Someone should automate mirroring for https://github.com/gentoo/gnome
- And review periodically pull requests there if there will be some...
On 11.08.2015 18:32, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello, everyone.
Now that we're
On 12/08/15 11:46, Shuai Zhao wrote:
2015-08-12 15:47 GMT+08:00 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org:
On 12 Aug 2015 15:20, Leno Hou wrote:
**Most importantly, Any Ideas/steps of how to porting gentoo on ppc64le
architecture?**
do you have hardware ? then it's simply a matter of booting
On 08/12/2015 12:11 PM, hasufell wrote:
On 08/12/2015 08:48 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:17:10 +0200 hasufell wrote:
On 08/11/2015 08:34 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
commit: 719cc5ef240b766953ddbe1e7a6593f8091eed12
Author: Mike Frysinger vapier AT gentoo DOT org
2015-08-12 15:47 GMT+08:00 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org:
On 12 Aug 2015 15:20, Leno Hou wrote:
**Most importantly, Any Ideas/steps of how to porting gentoo on ppc64le
architecture?**
do you have hardware ? then it's simply a matter of booting Gentoo in it
and
filing/fixing bugs
On 08/12/2015 08:48 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:17:10 +0200 hasufell wrote:
On 08/11/2015 08:34 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
commit: 719cc5ef240b766953ddbe1e7a6593f8091eed12
Author: Mike Frysinger vapier AT gentoo DOT org
AuthorDate: Tue Aug 11 06:28:16 2015 +
So, I've just tried to count the ++ for different ideas and even if I
missed one or two or misread someone's opinion, I think the result is
pretty clear:
reference the bug only in the summary: 1
don't make any of this mandatory: 1
Gentoo-Bug: 123 or similar short form: 9
Gentoo-Bug: url or
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 12/08/15 11:08 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
I was thinking about some syntax like this:
REQUIRED_USE=|| ( +foo bar ) ^^ ( +qt5 -qt4 )
The package manager would first evaluate each group in
REQUIRED_USE with the original set of USE flags. If
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 12:27:15 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/15 11:55 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:30:39 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius
a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/15 01:05 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 12/08/15 01:00 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 12:57:25 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius
a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/15 12:42 PM,
On 08/12/2015 05:59 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
hasufell schrieb:
So, I've just tried to count the ++ for different ideas and even if I
missed one or two or misread someone's opinion, I think the result is
pretty clear:
reference the bug only in the summary: 1
don't make any of
Michał Górny schrieb:
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333531 format, with the
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=; optional for Gentoo
Bugzilla, would be a compromise I can accept. I would not like having
to redundantly give the bug number when I already gave the URL.
Can
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 12/08/15 11:55 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
I think it is better seen as a list of implications, esp. for
this kind of questions :) With that in mind, there is no
autounmask-write: effective USE for a given package is input USE
with these
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/15 12:42 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
2 - is there a particular reasoning for the - in front of qt4
here? I only ask because it would seem that a single
default-enable should suffice in lists
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/15 12:53 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 12/08/15 11:55 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
I think it is better seen as a list of implications, esp.
for this kind of questions :) With that in mind,
hasufell schrieb:
So, I've just tried to count the ++ for different ideas and even if I
missed one or two or misread someone's opinion, I think the result is
pretty clear:
reference the bug only in the summary: 1
don't make any of this mandatory: 1
Gentoo-Bug: 123 or similar short form: 9
Dnia 2015-08-12, o godz. 17:59:03
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn chith...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
hasufell schrieb:
So, I've just tried to count the ++ for different ideas and even if I
missed one or two or misread someone's opinion, I think the result is
pretty clear:
reference the bug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/15 01:00 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 12:57:25 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius
a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/15 12:42 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Ian
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 12:57:25 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/15 12:42 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
2 - is there a particular reasoning for the - in front of qt4
here? I only
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:30:39 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/15 11:08 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Alexis Ballier wrote:
i.e. something that really tells the PM how to automate the
choice: -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/15 11:55 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:30:39 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius
a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/15 11:08 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Alexis
Dnia 2015-08-12, o godz. 18:25:07
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn chith...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
Michał Górny schrieb:
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333531 format, with the
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=; optional for Gentoo
Bugzilla, would be a compromise I can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/15 12:34 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-08-12, o godz. 18:25:07 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
chith...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
Michał Górny schrieb:
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333531 format,
with the
Hello
possibly using wrong ssh key... I suggest to contact infra in case if
you want to update your ssh key because in that case you should have
same error accessing your LDAP workspace.
On 12.08.2015 16:13, gro...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm trying to follow
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 05:21:20 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 23:30:31 +1000
Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
I invite you to reproduce the problem yourself then make the
judgement. Using REQUIRED_USE like this makes the affected
I'm trying to follow https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Gentoo_git_workflow:
grozin@elrond ~ $ git clone --depth=50
git+ssh://g...@git.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git
Cloning into 'gentoo'...
Permission denied (publickey).
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
Please make sure you have the
On 08/12/2015 12:21 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 23:30:31 +1000
Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
I invite you to reproduce the problem yourself then make the
judgement. Using REQUIRED_USE like this makes the affected packages
unusable.
Can't we all (except
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Alexis Ballier wrote:
it is more in the line of what we currently do, but that doesn't
resolve the 'sat' problem: it doesnt make clear we don't want to
satisfy it but rather walk through a list of causes and consequences
now that i'm thinking more about it, killing ||
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 09:38:19 -0500
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
I always wondered why pkg_pretend never caught on.
I to can see the advantage of it over REQUIRED_USE; it would allow the
package maintainer to give specific error messages about why use flag
combinations are invalid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/15 01:22 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 13:06:43 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius
a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/15 01:05 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 12/08/15 01:00 PM,
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 19:43:55 +0200
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
Hm, how about adding a new PM command like required_use foo -bar?
It would be used exclusively in pkg_pretend, and tell the PM to
suggest the necessary package.use changes to
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
pkg_pretend() {
if use qt4; then
required_use -qt5
else
required_use qt5
fi
}
And how would the PM understand that -qt5 is conditional upon qt4?
Such knowledge is required if it's supposed to auto-resolve stuff...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/15 02:00 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
pkg_pretend() { if use qt4; then required_use -qt5 else
required_use qt5 fi }
And how would the PM understand that -qt5 is conditional upon
qt4? Such
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 20:00:42 +0200
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
pkg_pretend() {
if use qt4; then
required_use -qt5
else
required_use qt5
fi
}
And how would the PM understand that -qt5 is
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 14:36:12 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/15 01:52 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 13:39:21 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius
a...@gentoo.org wrote:
...OR we could just adjust PMS to assume
Sergey Popov wrote:
qt? (
qt5? ( dev-lang/qtcore:5 )
!qt5? ( dev-lang/qtcore:4 )
)
Fine by me, if you would ask.
May I suggest instead:
qt? (
qt5? ( dev-lang/qt$something:5 )
qt4? ( dev-lang/qt$something:4 )
)
Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
qt? (
qt5? (
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 14:24:06 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/15 02:19 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 20:00:42 +0200 Ulrich Mueller
u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/15 03:15 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 14:24:06 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius
a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/15 02:19 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 20:00:42
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 19:25:37 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 20:19:08 +0200
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
pkg_pretend still needs to be executed to guess what useflags are
enabled or not, which information is needed before
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
The opposing viewpoint was ferringb believing he could do automatic
dependency resolution for a build server setup, without trying it
and without an implementation, and that a human-readable pkg_pretend
would somehow preclude that.
Hm, how about
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 3:40 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
So, I've just tried to count the ++ for different ideas and even if I
missed one or two or misread someone's opinion, I think the result is
pretty clear:
reference the bug only in the summary: 1
don't make any of this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/15 01:38 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
The opposing viewpoint was ferringb believing he could do
automatic dependency resolution for a build server setup,
without trying it and without an
On 08/12/2015 08:38 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 3:40 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
So, I've just tried to count the ++ for different ideas and even if I
missed one or two or misread someone's opinion, I think the result is
pretty clear:
reference the bug only
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 13:39:21 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/15 01:22 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 13:06:43 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius
a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/15 01:52 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 13:39:21 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius
a...@gentoo.org wrote:
...OR we could just adjust PMS to assume flag order determines
precedence and still not bother with a new operator: For ^^
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 13:06:43 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/15 01:05 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 12/08/15 01:00 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 12:57:25 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius
a...@gentoo.org
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 19:38:21 +0200
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
The opposing viewpoint was ferringb believing he could do automatic
dependency resolution for a build server setup, without trying it
and without an implementation, and that
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
Hm, how about adding a new PM command like required_use foo -bar?
It would be used exclusively in pkg_pretend, and tell the PM to
suggest the necessary package.use changes to the user (or even update
them automatically with the appropriate
On 08/12/2015 07:48 PM, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote:
On 08/12/2015 08:38 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 3:40 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
So, I've just tried to count the ++ for different ideas and even if I
missed one or two or misread someone's opinion, I think the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/15 01:50 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 19:43:55 +0200 Ulrich Mueller
u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
Hm, how about adding a new PM command like required_use foo
-bar? It would be used
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 20:00:42 +0200
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
pkg_pretend() {
if use qt4; then
required_use -qt5
else
required_use qt5
fi
}
And how would the PM understand that -qt5 is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/15 02:18 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 12/08/15 02:00 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
pkg_pretend() { if use qt4; then required_use -qt5 else
required_use qt5 fi }
And how would the PM
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 20:19:08 +0200
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
pkg_pretend still needs to be executed to guess what useflags are
enabled or not, which information is needed before dependency
calculation
You'd probably be implementing this in a SAT modulo theories kind of
way:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 17:08:59 +0200
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Alexis Ballier wrote:
i.e. something that really tells the PM how to automate the choice:
- 'qt5 - !qt4' is rather straightforward to solve and tells the PM
how (note that it is not equivalent to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/15 02:19 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 20:00:42 +0200 Ulrich Mueller
u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
pkg_pretend() { if use qt4; then required_use -qt5 else
required_use qt5 fi }
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 21:22:48 +0200
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 19:25:37 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 20:19:08 +0200
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
pkg_pretend still needs to be executed to
85 matches
Mail list logo
