Yes, I'm likely going to find out the same thing for the 120. The 80
is listed as not working on the Linux-USB site, but of course you
would not have had that info at the garage sale. ;-)
The 120 actually worked quite well under XP.
At least you only blew $2, right? I'm letting my son blow my be
On Apr 4, 2005 5:58 PM, Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark, I had assumed that you had ascertained that the device is
> supported in linux.
No - my 12 year old son wanted the device, earned the money, and
bought it. His PC is Linux (FC2 for simplicity) and I told him that if
it didn't wor
not set
# CONFIG_VIDEO_CX88 is not set
# CONFIG_VIDEO_OVCAMCHIP is not set
CONFIG_VIDEO_SELECT=y
flash linux # cat .config | grep V4
flash linux #
Thanks much,
Mark
On Apr 4, 2005 5:20 PM, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 4, 2005 4:54 PM, Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Apr 4, 2005 4:54 PM, Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I assume it is a video for linux (v4l) or v4l2 driver, in which case
> when the modules loads it should create a device called something like
> /dev/v4l/video0
Humm...could that be a problem? I'll have to look and see if Video for
Linu
On Apr 4, 2005 12:34 PM, Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I found these with a simple google:
>
> gv4l - front end to transcode's v4l functions
> streamer - front end to xawtv
> ffmpeg - command line
> kmediagrab
> avicap
>
> I am sure there are many many others.
>
> actually kino will cap
Hi,
Has anyone done this? Can you recommend some Linux apps that will
make video capture and relatively simple movie editing easy for my 12
year old? He's capturing XBox tricks and makes me boot my Gentoo
laptop back into Win XP so that he can do the capture.
The DVC120 is visible to things li
Hi,
Has anyone done this? Can you recommend some apps that will make
video capture and relatively simple movie editing easy for my 12 year
old? He's capturing XBox tricks and makes me boot my Gentoo laptop
back into Win XP so that he can do the capture.
The DVC120 is visible to things like u
On Apr 1, 2005 3:34 PM, David Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 2, 2005 12:19 AM, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 13:41:05 -0800 Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > | And since it's GMail I cannot
On Apr 1, 2005 12:19 PM, Bryan Oestergaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, not receiving duplicates due to filtering is certainly not what I
> meant by fixing your clients. I was actually hinting at clients (and
> users) behaving sensible and stop sending duplicates.
>
> btw, I have no idea wheth
On Apr 1, 2005 9:34 AM, A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Obviously. That's why you're still posting to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Why not make that email address bounce back to the sender? Im sure it will
> sink in faster :-)
>
OK by me. GMail r
On Apr 1, 2005 8:39 AM, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 22:10:00 +1200 Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | I say again, no other list I am on exhibits this problem, just bloody
> | change it back the the way it used to be, right, wrong or debateable
> | in tech
> >It's got to be an april fool's joke...
> Has to be. Why else would it use "NT" and "comercial-grade" in the same
> paragraph?
Not really. Don't you know that
GENTOO == Gee Everyone NT's Object Oriented?
I'm not a programmer but I hear that Object Oriented programming makes
it trivial to por
Replying to self:
Found this after a few more minutes. Sorry for the wasted bandwidth.
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=30547
Cheers,
Mark
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 18:47:56 -0800, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>It's been a long time since I ran in
Hi,
It's been a long time since I ran into all disk space getting used
up and I've forgotten where portage is putting downloaded files. Where
are the basic packages stored so that I can erase some and get going
again?
Thanks,
Mark
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:57:10 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, Holly, I don't think linux will be ready for the desktop for
> > quite awhile (yes, that does make me sad).
>
> Novell disagrees:
> http://business.news
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 13:23:01 +0200, Hans-Werner Hilse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm very late to answer in this thread and i must admit that I didn't
> read every post so far. But it seems to me everything goes the wrong
> way...
>
> On Sat, 26
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 11:57:06 -0800, John Myers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 March 2005 11:39, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> > I did some Googling and it seemed to suggest that I should look at
> > /etc/X11/gdm/gdm.conf and make sure that DisallowTCP=true is commented
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 23:00:15 -0800, John Myers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As far as the error goes, it sounds like it's a problem with FC2's X setup.
> Can you see if it works *from* a Gentoo box? Also, perhaps there's something
> about 'nolisten tcp' in your xorg.conf? Or in the way they built
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:01:34 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Pupeno wrote:
>
> > Even if id_dsa.pub and authorized_keys is group and world readable, it
> > doesn't
> > work.
>
> On the servers I used key auth with the .ssh folder is 0700 (i.e.
> drwx
Thanks for your help! More info below.
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 23:00:15 -0800, John Myers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 28 March 2005 16:48, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:11:38 -0800, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
> > I'm not clear
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:11:38 -0800, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Here's a little shell script I wrote to do this just now. It should work at
> > least on Gentoo clients. Note that I had a problem when sshing to localhost
> > that it would unset DISPLAY,
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 12:19:53 -0800, John Myers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 27 March 2005 15:11, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> Don't forget to start the X server (Xfree, Xorg, or Xnest) on :2 before
> running that. You shouldn't need to use xhost, ssh takes care
Dave,
Yes, I'm getting them. (I will from answering this message also!) ;-)
It started the same time the list changes started requiring me to
delete the Cc: entry also.
I think this 'conversion' isn't going so well yet.
- Mark
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:13:26 -0500, Dave Nebinger <[EMAIL
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 14:48:19 +0100, Graham Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Why? Isn't the point of replying to a mailing list to send the response
> > to the sender, which is the list?
>
> Yes, which is why the correct response for the mailing l
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 14:25:59 -0800, John Myers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 27 March 2005 09:31, John Myers wrote:
> > On Sunday 27 March 2005 08:35, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > >What I actually want to do is start Gnome on the remote box and see
> > > th
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 12:06:27 -0600, Jeff Smelser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 26 March 2005 05:55 pm, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> > I'm now logged on successfully to a remote machine. I can run X apps
> > and display them here successfully. Let's say tha
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 09:31:03 -0800, John Myers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 27 March 2005 08:35, Mark Knecht wrote:
> >What I actually want to do is start Gnome on the remote box and see
> > the whole Gnome desktop on my local box's second display. I do
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 21:17:44 -0500, Calvin Walton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:55:13 -0800, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ssh -X -Y -C -c blowfish -l mark IP-address
> >
> > I'm now logged on successfully to a remote mac
Hi,
On my local machines when one user is using the machine I can go to
a terminal using Alt-Ctrl-Fx and then after logging in do 'startx --
:2'. At this point I get a second copy of X running on F8 and I can
use the system while the other user's account remains logged on.
How do I do this f
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 16:15:19 -0800, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 08:00:12 +0800, William Kenworthy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What kind of router? I have found that position is very important.
> > Place base station well a
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 08:00:12 +0800, William Kenworthy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What kind of router? I have found that position is very important.
> Place base station well away from other objects (use an extension cable
> if needed), and above desktop clutter etc
>
> e.g., one monitor near th
Hi,
Hi. Mixed Gentoo/FC2 network. My wife and son use wireless
connections but they are not reliable. Typically their machines see
something on the order of -50db. Is this too low to be reliable?
wlan0 Scan completed :
Cell 01 - Address: 00:09:5B:XX:YY:ZZ
ESSID
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 19:36:21 -0500 (EST), A. Khattri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2005, Nick Rout wrote:
>
> > are you talking about portage on top of MacOS X (ppc-macos) or native
> > linux (ppc)?
>
> I meant Portage on top of OS X yes.
So that's a pretty cool idea to me anyway.
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:39:30 -0800, Justin Patrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I originally installed Gentoo on my server box a very long time ago
> (3-4 years I think) and it's still running strong. However, I'm
> noticing *big* lags when doing anything HD related. Even starting up
> simple progra
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 08:17:21 -0500, Bill Roberts
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 16:09 Sat 26 Feb , Ric de France wrote:
> > Brett,
> >
> > On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:44:44 -0500 (EST), Brett I. Holcomb
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I start up using xdm and get an login window on vt7 from wh
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:59:15 -0800 (PST), maxim wexler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have a fat32 partition on another drive /dev/hda5
> which is listed in /etc/fstab like this:
>
> /dev/hda5 /home/blissfix/fat vfat auto,user o o
>
> But as user I have no access, only as ro
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:50:32 +0100, Leif B. Kristensen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 February 2005 06:07, Aaron Walker wrote:
> > Mark Knecht wrote:
> > > The Gentoo developers and package maintainers really do a great job
> > > of makin
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:47:24 -0500, Jesse Guardiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just do:
> >
> > emerge --resume
>
> I don't think that works with -e. I tried it and got
> an error message stating that there was nothing to
> resume. I think --resume only resumes individual emerges,
> not batch
Amazing results. emerge -e world required 463 packages be emerged on
my system. With only one exception they all worked first time. The one
failure (nforce-audio) apprears to be a real problem so I submited a
bug report.
The Gentoo developers and package maintainers really do a great job of
making
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 04:08:35 -0800, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I'm not doing this right though as I've even tried removing
> alsa-jack from the world file (assuming a # removes it...) and that
> doesn't stop the system from getting alsa-driver e
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 04:11:35 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 19 February 2005 08:28 pm, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 18:43:20 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 18:43:20 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 19 February 2005 03:46 pm, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > To compound this a bit I wanted to an emerge -e world on this box in
> > the coming week but th
alsa-driver
[ebuild N] media-sound/alsa-driver-1.0.8
gandalf root #
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:59:12 -0800, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>Is hand editing /var/lib/portage/world OK?
>
>I had noticed this problem the other day while working on an
> Ev
Hi,
Is hand editing /var/lib/portage/world OK?
I had noticed this problem the other day while working on an
Evolution problem on my dad's machine. In that case I had started and
emerge -e gnome, emerge was after alsa-driver but then the alsa-driver
ebuild correctly decided to not install als
Is there a command that tells Linux to really memory that is really
not in use? I'm sure top is not the best app for looking at this so
what app would be better?
Here's a picture of my machine running Gnome and Mozilla immediately
after a reboot.
top - 11:02:50 up 3 min, 2 users, load average:
Thanks to those who helped in the last two days when I had to ask some
questions. I rebuilt a good portion of the machine today using emerge
-e gnome and when it was done all of the Evolution problems had
disappeared and everything seems to be working fine.
Thanks for the help with emerge problems
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 22:22:04 +, Etaoin Shrdlu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 17 February 2005 21:09, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
> > Hi again,
> >OK, I was another 90 minutes into the last 156 and it failed
> > somewhere around #60 with the following failu
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:32:47 -0800, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:19:50 -0600, Andrew Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Mark Knecht wrote:
> > > Thanks to all. It started at 1 of 156. By my calulation that looks
> > >
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 15:41:33 -0500, Dennis Taylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have read the DOCs, but I am missing something. I want to run X-windows on
> my Gentoo box (2.6.10-gentoo-r6), but so far have been unsuccessful. It is
> unclear to me whether Gnome or KDE need me to first install
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:19:50 -0600, Andrew Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark Knecht wrote:
> > Thanks to all. It started at 1 of 156. By my calulation that looks correct:
> >
> > 103 of 260 passed
> > 104 failed
> > 1 of 156 to do
> >
I'm not sure I have...)
Thanks,
Mark
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:16:48 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 11:11:28AM -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > Hi,
> >After looking into a problem with Evolution it appears that a few
> >
Hi,
After looking into a problem with Evolution it appears that a few
people solved the problem doing an 'emerge -e gnome' so I decided to
give that a try. It ran for 4 hours and got to item 104 out of 260 and
then failed because for some reason portage wasn't smart about the
alsa-driver and 2.6
Hi,
I'm having trouble on a Gentoo machine that's run fine for the last
15 months but is now having trouble with Evolution. I suspect that
it's possibly caused by my lack of knowledge about mounting partitions
and possibly coupled with recent updates. I hope you can set me
straight.
The mach
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 21:26:43 +, rodrigo ahumada
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El dom, 13-02-2005 a las 15:36 -0800, Mark Knecht escribió:
>
> >
> > The '0' & '1' are the real channel numbers that LinuxSampler has
> > assigned to
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 15:48:02 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 13 February 2005 03:31 pm, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > > 3) Ask me which on I want to use
> >
> > Easy to make it ask the question but so
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:44:02 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 13 February 2005 12:22 pm, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >This is not a Gentoo thing at all but I don't know where else to
> > ask
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 16:02:32 +, rodrigo ahumada
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i made my own auto-decompresser with python-gtk (i dont use
> file-roller), it uses "file" to get file type and select with command to
> use and showme the output.
>
> in module "commands" you get "commands.getoutput
Hi,
This is not a Gentoo thing at all but I don't know where else to
ask so I'm coming here. Delete if you're not interested.
I have a suspicion this is some big scripting job. Scripting to any
great extent is something I know nothing about. I'm hoping that maybe
someone can point me in the
Do you have any NFS or Samba mounts? Try adding "_netdev " to the
mount options if you do.
- Mark
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:38:29 +, rodrigo ahumada
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El vie, 11-02-2005 a las 22:14 -0800, Steven Susbauer escribió:
> hi:
> > Try adding "[*] Use real mode APM BIOS c
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:24:41 +0100, Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> Thanks for the explanation, Mark... I do have a GMail account, but I
> don't use it for this (or any) list atm, and what I do use it for is
> very limited, so I don't know all that much about how to set it up or
> h
1 - 100 of 747 matches
Mail list logo
