Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge and CPU core usage

Howdy, I don't recall seeing the thread on the forums but it sort of sounds a lot like what I was reading on -dev as to why it is not.  Basically, it would be a complex and difficult piece of code.  According to some, it could even create problems that don't exist now, depending on what

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge and CPU core usage

I can't be sure whether these links will help, but there were conversations. https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-866779-start-0.html https://www.reddit.com/r/Gentoo/comments/68psrz/why_does_emerge_calculate_dependencies_on_a/ On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 6:44 AM Dale wrote: > > james wrote: > > On

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge and CPU core usage

james wrote: > On 12/9/19 1:31 AM, Dale wrote: >> Howdy, >> > >> I'm sure trying to get portage to do things in parallel would be a >> programmers nightmare.� It may not even be doable given how the >> tree is >> done or that the complexity of calculating all the options is just to >> much to

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge and CPU core usage

On 12/9/19 1:31 AM, Dale wrote: Howdy, I'm sure trying to get portage to do things in parallel would be a programmers nightmare.� It may not even be doable given how the tree is done or that the complexity of calculating all the options is just to much to run in parallel. Hello Dale,

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge and CPU core usage

Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Monday, 9 December 2019 06:31:08 GMT Dale wrote: >> Howdy, >> >> As some may recall, I upgraded my rig to a 8 core CPU, expanded memory, >> added a hard drive etc etc a while back. All of which made things a bit >> faster. Each core isn't that much faster but the extra

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge and CPU core usage

On Monday, 9 December 2019 06:31:08 GMT Dale wrote: > Howdy, > > As some may recall, I upgraded my rig to a 8 core CPU, expanded memory, > added a hard drive etc etc a while back. All of which made things a bit > faster. Each core isn't that much faster but the extra cores certainly > help in

[gentoo-user] Emerge and CPU core usage

Howdy, As some may recall, I upgraded my rig to a 8 core CPU, expanded memory, added a hard drive etc etc a while back.  All of which made things a bit faster.  Each core isn't that much faster but the extra cores certainly help in most cases.  It is a noticeable improvement.  There's one thing

[gentoo-user] emerge --sync: problem refreshing keys

Hello to everyone, since yesterday emerge --sync fails because it can't refresh keys. The messages I get are: Syncing repository 'gentoo' into '/usr/portage'... * Using keys from /usr/share/openpgp-keys/gentoo-release.asc * Refreshing keys via WKD ... [ !! ] * Refreshing keys from keyserver

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge wants to downgrade icu

On dim. 16 juin 13:42:48 2019, netfab wrote: > Because app-office/libreoffice-bin package (here 6.1.5.2) needs to be > updated/upgraded at each dev-libs/icu update, but it takes time. Isn’t it possible to make app-office/libreoffice-bin dependent of any version of dev-libs/icu instead of a

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge wants to downgrade icu

Le 16/06/19 à 10:22, Alarig Le Lay a tapoté : > Hi, sorry for the delay. > > On mer. 12 juin 12:31:31 2019, netfab wrote: > > Try --autounmask-backtrack=y emerge option. > > Thanks a lot, it worked. > But why portage bothers about icu so suddenly? > Now that =app-office/libreoffice-bin-6.2.4.2

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge wants to downgrade icu

Le 16/06/19 à 10:22, Alarig Le Lay a tapoté : > Hi, sorry for the delay. > > On mer. 12 juin 12:31:31 2019, netfab wrote: > > Try --autounmask-backtrack=y emerge option. > > Thanks a lot, it worked. > But why portage bothers about icu so suddenly? > Because app-office/libreoffice-bin package

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge wants to downgrade icu

Hi, sorry for the delay. On mer. 12 juin 12:31:31 2019, netfab wrote: > Try --autounmask-backtrack=y emerge option. Thanks a lot, it worked. But why portage bothers about icu so suddenly? -- Alarig

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge wants to downgrade icu

Le 12/06/19 à 11:54, Alarig Le Lay a tapoté : > Hi, > > Since some days emerge asks me to go back to ICU from profile 13.0, > but I don’t understand why. > Try --autounmask-backtrack=y emerge option.

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge wants to downgrade icu

Le mer. 12 juin 2019 à 11:54, Alarig Le Lay a écrit : > > Hi, > > Since some days emerge asks me to go back to ICU from profile 13.0, but > I don’t understand why. > > ~ # emerge --ask --verbose --update --deep --newuse @world > > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: > >

[gentoo-user] Emerge wants to downgrade icu

Hi, Since some days emerge asks me to go back to ICU from profile 13.0, but I don’t understand why. ~ # emerge --ask --verbose --update --deep --newuse @world These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild r UD#]

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge with alternate ROOT=

May 28, 2019 9:20 PM, "tedheadster" wrote: > I am having problems trying to rebuild a slave disk with ROOT=/mnt/gentoo. > > While it is _sort_ of working, it does something very unexpected. It > rebuilds 154 packages on the _host_ system. > > Oddly, it does notice that I have different CFLAGS

[gentoo-user] emerge with alternate ROOT=

I am having problems trying to rebuild a slave disk with ROOT=/mnt/gentoo. While it is _sort_ of working, it does something very unexpected. It rebuilds 154 packages on the _host_ system. Oddly, it does notice that I have different CFLAGS set in /etc/portage/make.conf and rebuilds the host

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge --sync source

Mick wrote: > > I can think of 3 things, but more learned M/L contributors may add to these: > > 1. The SATA connection has come loose. With time and movement it can come > (slightly) adrift. Pushing it back in fully fixes this problem - also see No. > 2 below. > > 2. The physical connector's

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge --sync source

On Thursday, 7 March 2019 10:10:53 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Wednesday, 6 March 2019 16:31:27 GMT Laurence Perkins wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-03-01 at 10:12 +, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > [OT] > > > Evidence is mounting that the Atom box is in terminal decline. I get > > > things like

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge --sync source

On Wednesday, 6 March 2019 16:31:27 GMT Laurence Perkins wrote: > On Fri, 2019-03-01 at 10:12 +, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > [OT] > > Evidence is mounting that the Atom box is in terminal decline. I get > > things like batches of files in the portage tree changing owner, and then > > when I

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge --sync source

On 06/03/19 17:39, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > Up to now, I've never had a HDD or SDD fail on me. :-) I hope that > when this does eventually happen, I'll be prepared. I don't think I've had one of mine fail. I have, however, done recovery jobs on two drives that did fail that I managed to revive

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge --sync source

Hello, Rich. I'd like to say hello again to everybody, just to mark that I'm still here and still using Gentoo, and thank people for (a lot of) help rendered in the past. My system, used mainly for SW development, has been stable and well behaved, with very occasional exceptions, for some while

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge --sync source

On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 11:31 AM Laurence Perkins wrote: > > If it's just that the SSD is failing, then get a new one before > something important gets damaged and you have to redo the whole thing. IMO any kind of storage device should be treated as if it could fail at any time without warning.

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge --sync source

On Fri, 2019-03-01 at 10:12 +, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Thursday, 28 February 2019 15:47:41 GMT Rich Freeman wrote: > > > In general it is usually simplest to just remove /usr/portage > > anytime > > you change the sync settings. At least until portage gets smarter > > about it. > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge --sync source

On Thursday, 28 February 2019 15:47:41 GMT Rich Freeman wrote: > In general it is usually simplest to just remove /usr/portage anytime > you change the sync settings. At least until portage gets smarter > about it. That works well on a sufficiently powerful box; it only took - oh, I don't know

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge --sync source

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:41 AM Peter Humphrey wrote: > > On Thursday, 28 February 2019 08:43:13 GMT Davyd McColl wrote: > > > Well, that's pretty-much how git works -- that local repo was still pointing > > to the old remote. Updating your repos.conf won't change that as the old > > remote is

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge --sync source

On Thursday, 28 February 2019 08:43:13 GMT Davyd McColl wrote: > > On 2019/02/28 10:36:35, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > I have a little server box on my LAN, which I use as a git server. I'm > > having a bit of trouble with it pro tem so I decided to switch the git > > sync source on this box. > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge --sync source

I filed a bug report https://bugs.gentoo.org/679040. Yes, currently you need to update your git config manually everytime you change your git remote.

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge --sync source

On 2019/02/28 10:36:35, Peter Humphrey wrote: Hello list, I have a little server box on my LAN, which I use as a git server. I'm having a bit of trouble with it pro tem so I decided to switch the git sync source on this box. I removed the entry pointing to the local server in

[gentoo-user] Emerge --sync source

Hello list, I have a little server box on my LAN, which I use as a git server. I'm having a bit of trouble with it pro tem so I decided to switch the git sync source on this box. I removed the entry pointing to the local server in repos.conf/gentoo.conf and put in 'sync-uri =

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --changed-use @world : how to interpret its output?

On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 12:34:08 +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote: > nice -19 emerge -av1 --update --keep-going --tree --changed-use \ > --unordered-display --verbose-conflicts @world > > I get LOTS of request to change package.use to include abi_x86_32. > > It looks like emerge wants to change

[gentoo-user] emerge --changed-use @world : how to interpret its output?

Hi, I have difficulties to interpret the output of nice -19 emerge -av1 --update --keep-going --tree --changed-use \ --unordered-display --verbose-conflicts @world I get LOTS of request to change package.use to include abi_x86_32. It looks like emerge wants to change half of system (which

[gentoo-user] emerge fails: media-sound/alsa-tools-1.1.6

Applying this makes it work: diff --git a/media-sound/alsa-tools/alsa-tools-1.1.6.ebuild b/media-sound/alsa-tools/alsa-tools-1.1.6.ebuild index 18fcd567ec8..85804ba8aae 100644 --- a/media-sound/alsa-tools/alsa-tools-1.1.6.ebuild +++ b/media-sound/alsa-tools/alsa-tools-1.1.6.ebuild @@ -43,7 +43,7

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge --sync fails on excluded stuff

On 2018-10-22 16:26, Walter Dnes wrote: I have a 10 year old Core2 as an emergency backup machine. Let's just say it's not as fast as modern machines. To speed up "emerge --sync". I put a bunch of unneeded stuff in an "rsync_excludes" file (attached). Now "emerge --sync" has started failing,

[gentoo-user] Emerge --sync fails on excluded stuff

I have a 10 year old Core2 as an emergency backup machine. Let's just say it's not as fast as modern machines. To speed up "emerge --sync". I put a bunch of unneeded stuff in an "rsync_excludes" file (attached). Now "emerge --sync" has started failing, because it obviously can't verify the

[gentoo-user] emerge: custom formatting for USE flags in -pv/-av output

Hello, I see there is a way to customize colors in the output of emerge, but is there a way to customize the other formatting attributes, short of editing the source itself? What I would like to do is to change the way USE flags are shown, possibly - Removing the bold attribute for disabled USE

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge completly a package but dont install it?

On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 1:28 PM wrote: > > On 08/09 09:48, Mateusz Lenik wrote: > > Turns out emerge has this nice flag (excerpt from emerge(1) manpage): > > > > --buildpkgonly, -B > > Creates binary packages for all ebuilds processed without > > actually merging the packages. This

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge completly a package but dont install it?

On 08/09 09:48, Mateusz Lenik wrote: > Turns out emerge has this nice flag (excerpt from emerge(1) manpage): > > --buildpkgonly, -B > Creates binary packages for all ebuilds processed without > actually merging the packages. This comes with the caveat that all > build-time

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge completly a package but dont install it?

Turns out emerge has this nice flag (excerpt from emerge(1) manpage): --buildpkgonly, -B Creates binary packages for all ebuilds processed without actually merging the packages. This comes with the caveat that all build-time dependencies must already be emerged on the system.

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge completly a package but dont install it?

On Wed, 8 Aug 2018 19:12:37 +0200 tu...@posteo.de wrote: > Hi, > > is it possible to go through process of installing a not-installed > package from source to executable ... without actually install the > package - so the system as such is not touched? > > Cheers > Meino > > > You can use

[gentoo-user] emerge completly a package but dont install it?

Hi, is it possible to go through process of installing a not-installed package from source to executable ... without actually install the package - so the system as such is not touched? Cheers Meino

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge and binary packages

On 07/02/18 04:49, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: > I think autofs will fit that type of solution > And why just don't put if in fstab and forget about it? > > > I had it in fstab but the "main" frontend is not always on and it can hang NFS mounts during startup, even with the 'bg' option.

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge and binary packages

I think autofs will fit that type of solution And why just don't put if in fstab and forget about it?

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge and binary packages

On 07/01/18 03:56, Marc Joliet wrote: > Am Samstag, 30. Juni 2018, 19:50:47 CEST schrieb Daniel Frey: >> Hi all, >> >> Some background: I run mythtv with a single backend and five frontends. >> >> For many, many years I've been using binpkg to help ease the compile >> pain on my Intel NUC

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge and binary packages

Am Samstag, 30. Juni 2018, 19:50:47 CEST schrieb Daniel Frey: > Hi all, > > Some background: I run mythtv with a single backend and five frontends. > > For many, many years I've been using binpkg to help ease the compile > pain on my Intel NUC Celeron-based frontends. I use distcc on one to >

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge and binary packages

On Sunday, 1 July 2018 3:50:47 AM AEST Daniel Frey wrote: > Hi all, > > Some background: I run mythtv with a single backend and five frontends. > > For many, many years I've been using binpkg to help ease the compile > pain on my Intel NUC Celeron-based frontends. I use distcc on one to >

Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge and binary packages

On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 10:50:47 -0700, Daniel Frey wrote: > For many, many years I've been using binpkg to help ease the compile > pain on my Intel NUC Celeron-based frontends. I use distcc on one to > compile all my packages and export /usr/portage/packages via nfs. > > I am wondering if it's

[gentoo-user] Emerge and binary packages

Hi all, Some background: I run mythtv with a single backend and five frontends. For many, many years I've been using binpkg to help ease the compile pain on my Intel NUC Celeron-based frontends. I use distcc on one to compile all my packages and export /usr/portage/packages via nfs. I am

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --sync, where is the URL configured?

On 16:57 Wed 20 Jun, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > I am following the instructions here: > > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Chroot > > Got to the emerge --sync step, and it works! But why? There is no > $CHROOT/etc/portage/repos.conf, let alone a gentoo.conf file inside it. > So how does it know where

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --sync, where is the URL configured?

On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 16:57:47 -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Chroot > > Got to the emerge --sync step, and it works! But why? There is no > $CHROOT/etc/portage/repos.conf, let alone a gentoo.conf file inside it. > So how does it know where to sync from? Is there a

[gentoo-user] emerge --sync, where is the URL configured?

I am following the instructions here: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Chroot Got to the emerge --sync step, and it works! But why? There is no $CHROOT/etc/portage/repos.conf, let alone a gentoo.conf file inside it. So how does it know where to sync from? -- Please don't Cc: me privately on

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge colors and light background

> "KE" == Klaus Ethgen writes: KE> I use light background and many colors of emerge and other tools are KE> simple unreadable (like light green). I also use light backgrounds for my terminals. For eix, I have this in a file in /etc/eixrc/: BG0=none BG1=none

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge colors and light background

On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 08:16:30 +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > I use light background and many colors of emerge and other tools are > simple unreadable (like light green). I searched how to adapt them to my > background but did not success. I already know about color.map but this > just allows to tune

[gentoo-user] emerge colors and light background

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi Folks, I recently start with gentoo due to frustration of the rapidly degrading quality of debian. Currently I have pretty good feelings about gentoo but there is one thing that is pretty annoying. I use light background and many colors of

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge custom notes reminders

On 03/22/2018 12:25 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 12:11:05 -0500, R0b0t1 wrote: > >>> Is there a way to add custom notes reminders during emerge or after? >>> >> >> What kind of reminders? Perhaps we could have a developer add some >> encouraging messages to various packages,

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge custom notes reminders

On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 12:11:05 -0500, R0b0t1 wrote: > > Is there a way to add custom notes reminders during emerge or after? > > > > What kind of reminders? Perhaps we could have a developer add some > encouraging messages to various packages, or maybe some news items? I > know I could use some

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge custom notes reminders

On 03/22/2018 11:11 AM, R0b0t1 wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:28 AM, wrote: >> Is there a way to add custom notes reminders during emerge or after? >> > > What kind of reminders? Perhaps we could have a developer add some > encouraging messages to various packages,

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge custom notes reminders

the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > On 03/22/2018 10:51 AM, Dale wrote: >> Neil Bothwick wrote: >>> On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:36:37 -0500, Dale wrote: >>> > It was overwritten because that directory is not part of > CONFIG_PROTECT, hardly surprising as that is not a standard > configuration

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge custom notes reminders

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:28 AM, wrote: > Is there a way to add custom notes reminders during emerge or after? > What kind of reminders? Perhaps we could have a developer add some encouraging messages to various packages, or maybe some news items? I know I could use

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge custom notes reminders

On 03/22/2018 10:51 AM, Dale wrote: > Neil Bothwick wrote: >> On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:36:37 -0500, Dale wrote: >> It was overwritten because that directory is not part of CONFIG_PROTECT, hardly surprising as that is not a standard configuration location. If the device can't be

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge custom notes reminders

On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 10:50:44 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >> Couldn't that location be added in make.conf?  As you pointed out, it > >> shouldn't be there but since it is, maybe protection can be added to > >> prevent future issues.  > > > > I imagine that would prevent the new

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge custom notes reminders

Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:36:37 -0500, Dale wrote: > >>> It was overwritten because that directory is not part of >>> CONFIG_PROTECT, hardly surprising as that is not a standard >>> configuration location. If the device can't be configured from a file >>> in /etc the ebuild

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge custom notes reminders

On 03/22/2018 10:41 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:36:37 -0500, Dale wrote: > >>> It was overwritten because that directory is not part of >>> CONFIG_PROTECT, hardly surprising as that is not a standard >>> configuration location. If the device can't be configured from a file

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge custom notes reminders

On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:36:37 -0500, Dale wrote: > > It was overwritten because that directory is not part of > > CONFIG_PROTECT, hardly surprising as that is not a standard > > configuration location. If the device can't be configured from a file > > in /etc the ebuild needs to back up the

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge custom notes reminders

Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 09:28:27 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >> I didn't pay attention to it as my scanner was already configured. >> What it didn't tell me that the upgrade emptied my configuration file: >> /opt/brother/scanner/brscan4/brsanenetdevice4.cfg >> >> It

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge custom notes reminders

On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 09:28:27 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > I didn't pay attention to it as my scanner was already configured. > What it didn't tell me that the upgrade emptied my configuration file: > /opt/brother/scanner/brscan4/brsanenetdevice4.cfg > > It is not a Gentoo like

[gentoo-user] emerge custom notes reminders

Is there a way to add custom notes reminders during emerge or after? I've upgraded the bin scanner package (from overlay): brother-scan4-bin-0.4.4-r4 and I receive an email note from emerge: LOG: postinst You may need to be in the scanner or plugdev group in order to use the scanner To add a

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --oneshot portage

On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:32:24 +, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > If portage needed to be emerged first, portage would do so. That used > > to be the approach years ago, when portage updates were more > > significant. > > There's still room for confusion, though. For a long time, an update to >

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --oneshot portage

On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 09:26:17 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 19:41:39 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > > Once you have unset those variables, try a world update rather than > > > trying to cherry pick when you think needs to be updated. > > > > " emerge -uDNavq

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --oneshot portage

On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 19:41:39 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > Once you have unset those variables, try a world update rather than > > trying to cherry pick when you think needs to be updated. > > " emerge -uDNavq world" appears to be working (and new "portage" is > there). I have

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --oneshot portage

On 03/13/2018 06:56 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:47:18 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >> I did emerge manually sys-libs/zlib and ruby >> but I'm still left with conflict. >> >> The portage-2.3.6 is no longer in tree, is it the reason I'm getting >> this error? > >

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --oneshot portage

On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:47:18 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > I did emerge manually sys-libs/zlib and ruby > but I'm still left with conflict. > > The portage-2.3.6 is no longer in tree, is it the reason I'm getting > this error? No. Packages are removed from the tree all the time, it

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --oneshot portage

On 03/13/2018 04:19 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:52:34 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >> I spoke too soon. Now, when I try: emerge -u @system >> I'm getting an error as well. >> >> emerge -ua @system >> >> These are the packages that would be merged, in order: >> >>

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --oneshot portage

On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:52:34 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > I spoke too soon. Now, when I try: emerge -u @system > I'm getting an error as well. > > emerge -ua @system > > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: > > Calculating dependencies... done! > > WARNING: One or

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --oneshot portage

Thelma On 03/13/2018 12:11 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:36:12 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >> sys-apps/portage:0 >> >> (sys-apps/portage-2.3.16:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) >> pulled in by sys-apps/portage (Argument) >> >>

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --oneshot portage

Hi, On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 13:38:40 -0600 the...@sys-concept.com wrote: […] just a side note: [ebuild U ] sys-apps/portage-2.3.24-r1 [2.3.6] USE="(ipc) native-extensions xattr -build -doc -epydoc -gentoo-dev% (-rsync-verify) (-selinux) (-linguas_ru%)" PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_5*

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --oneshot portage

On 03/13/2018 12:11 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:36:12 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >> sys-apps/portage:0 >> >> (sys-apps/portage-2.3.16:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) >> pulled in by sys-apps/portage (Argument) >> >>

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --oneshot portage

On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:36:12 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > sys-apps/portage:0 > > (sys-apps/portage-2.3.16:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) > pulled in by sys-apps/portage (Argument) > > (sys-apps/portage-2.3.6:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by > >

[gentoo-user] emerge --oneshot portage

I'm upgrading an older system (maybe 4-months old). and getting an error running emerge --oneshot portage emerge --oneshot portage Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild rR] app-arch/bzip2-1.0.6-r8 [1.0.6-r8] [ebuild U ] sys-devel/automake-1.15.1-r2 [1.15-r2] USE="{-test%}"

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @world and package.mask ?

Am 27.02.2018 um 14:29 schrieb Helmut Jarausch: > I don't understand portage (any more). > > I want to keep dev-qt/qt-meta-4.8.6 (QT4) which requires > > media-libs/phonon[qt4] > > I do have media-libs/phonon-4.9.1-r1[qt4,qt5] installed here. > And in /etc/portage/package.mask I have >>

[gentoo-user] emerge @world and package.mask ?

Hi, I don't understand portage (any more). I want to keep dev-qt/qt-meta-4.8.6 (QT4) which requires media-libs/phonon[qt4] I do have media-libs/phonon-4.9.1-r1[qt4,qt5] installed here. And in /etc/portage/package.mask I have media-libs/phonon-4.9.9 media-libs/phonon-vlc-4.9.9 But still,

[gentoo-user] emerge dev-hasell/stack fails with unclear error

When emerging dev-haskell/stack-1.3.2 I'm getting: [ 84 of 121] Compiling Stack.Path ( src/Stack/Path.hs, dist/build/Stack/Path.o ) [ 85 of 121] Compiling Stack.Package( src/Stack/Package.hs, dist/build/Stack/Package.o ) [100 of 121] Compiling Stack.Upload ( src/Stack/Upload.hs,

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -quad --newuse @world

gg wrote: > Hallo , > > please help me. I try to install a new Gentoo with no-multilib (AMD64) , > > but compiling sandbox fails : > > > ebuild R ] sys-apps/sandbox-2.12 > > Would you like to merge these packages? [Yes/No] y Verifying ebuild manifests Emerging (1 of 1)

[gentoo-user] emerge -quad --newuse @world

Hallo , please help me. I try to install a new Gentoo with no-multilib (AMD64) , but compiling sandbox fails : ebuild R ] sys-apps/sandbox-2.12 Would you like to merge these packages? [Yes/No] y >>> Verifying ebuild manifests >>> Emerging (1 of 1) sys-apps/sandbox-2.12::gentoo >>>

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge error for dev-lisp/clisp-2.49-r9

OK, based on #Bug 638514, installing clisp-2.49.60 fixed the problem. Thanks! On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 12:51 AM, Corbin Bird wrote: > > > On 01/14/2018 02:39 PM, Quico Jurado wrote: > > Hello, > > > > After doing doing the upgrade to my 17.0 profile > >

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge error for dev-lisp/clisp-2.49-r9

On 01/14/2018 02:39 PM, Quico Jurado wrote: > Hello, > > After doing doing the upgrade to my 17.0 profile > (`default/linux/amd64/17.0/desktop'), and recompiling all my packages > I ran into a problem while installing clisp. Basically is bailing out > on the configure stage, this is the relevant

[gentoo-user] emerge error for dev-lisp/clisp-2.49-r9

Hello, After doing doing the upgrade to my 17.0 profile (`default/linux/amd64/17.0/desktop'), and recompiling all my packages I ran into a problem while installing clisp. Basically is bailing out on the configure stage, this is the relevant output of the configure script (suppressed some output

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge @preserved-rebuild failure

On Sat, 6 Jan 2018 21:21:16 +0100, Hartmut Figge wrote: > Mostly stable Gentoo. After having fun with linguas *g* > > !!! existing preserved libs found What's the rest of this output, it should list the packages and files involved. > i5-64 /home/hafi # emerge -q @preserved-rebuild > > emerge:

[gentoo-user] emerge @preserved-rebuild failure

Greetings, Mostly stable Gentoo. After having fun with linguas *g* !!! existing preserved libs found i5-64 /home/hafi # emerge -q @preserved-rebuild emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "dev-lang/ruby:2.1". (dependency required by "@preserved-rebuild" [argument]) [?] dev-lang/ruby

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -e and --resume

On Fri, Jan 05 2018, Daniel Frey wrote: > On 01/05/18 18:50, allan gottlieb wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 05 2018, Daniel Frey wrote: >> >>> On 01/05/18 13:15, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Fri, 05 Jan 2018 13:00:20 -0500, allan gottlieb wrote: > I am finally moving my production machine the the

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -e and --resume

On Sat, 06 Jan 2018 09:40:32 +, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > If the emerge has completed, there is nothing to resume. Just make a > > > note > > > of the packages that failed to build ans emerge --oneshot them, > > > with any necessary fixes. > > > > Thank you. So far (only 104 to go) just

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -e and --resume

On Saturday, 6 January 2018 02:49:53 GMT allan gottlieb wrote: > On Fri, Jan 05 2018, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > On Fri, 05 Jan 2018 13:00:20 -0500, allan gottlieb wrote: > >> I am finally moving my production machine the the 17.0 profile. > >> Currently running is > >> > >> emerge -e

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -e and --resume

On 01/05/18 18:50, allan gottlieb wrote: On Fri, Jan 05 2018, Daniel Frey wrote: On 01/05/18 13:15, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Fri, 05 Jan 2018 13:00:20 -0500, allan gottlieb wrote: I am finally moving my production machine the the 17.0 profile. Currently running is emerge -e

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -e and --resume

On Fri, Jan 05 2018, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Fri, 05 Jan 2018 13:00:20 -0500, allan gottlieb wrote: > >> I am finally moving my production machine the the 17.0 profile. >> Currently running is >> >> emerge -e --keep-going @world >> >> So far there is one failure (libcryptui, the fix is

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -e and --resume

On 01/05/18 13:15, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Fri, 05 Jan 2018 13:00:20 -0500, allan gottlieb wrote: I am finally moving my production machine the the 17.0 profile. Currently running is emerge -e --keep-going @world So far there is one failure (libcryptui, the fix is easy). Am I correct

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -e and --resume

On Fri, 05 Jan 2018 13:00:20 -0500, allan gottlieb wrote: > I am finally moving my production machine the the 17.0 profile. > Currently running is > > emerge -e --keep-going @world > > So far there is one failure (libcryptui, the fix is easy). > > Am I correct that when the above emerge

[gentoo-user] emerge -e and --resume

I am finally moving my production machine the the 17.0 profile. Currently running is emerge -e --keep-going @world So far there is one failure (libcryptui, the fix is easy). Am I correct that when the above emerge completes, I should run simply emerge --resume Thanks, allan PS in

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -e @world failed

On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 01:08:12 +0100 tu...@posteo.de wrote: > HHi, > > I did it, > > I started emerge -e @world --keep-going. > > And it failed while installing linux-gazette: > >>> Emerging (370 of 2114) app-doc/linux-gazette-117::gentoo > >>> Installing (360 of 2114)

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --info

On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 2:36 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 06/12/2017 04:31, Adam Carter wrote: > > Does the output reflect; > > 1. What will be used for the next build > > 2. What was used on the last successful build > > 3. What was used on the last build attempt > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --info

On 06/12/2017 04:31, Adam Carter wrote: > Does the output reflect; > 1. What will be used for the next build > 2. What was used on the last successful build > 3. What was used on the last build attempt > > If its 1 or 3, then USE=custom-cflags does not work on firefox... It reflects what is

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >