knowing what those are
I cannot express interest.
--
Jody Garnett
On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 at 17:07, patrick way wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am a geo-spatial enthusiast and member of the OpenRewrite team. Between
> 2002 and 2010, I leveraged GeoTools for a geo-spatially enabled restricted
o the build
system; as a team we have that developers guide.
--
Jody Garnett
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 at 03:09, Kalén, Martin wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> OK, thanks - great that you are so open for this contribution, much
> appreciated. GitHub invite for sweco-semara received and accepte
Martin:
Thanks, that sounds great. I have sent you an invitation, we appreciate you
taking part directly :)
As for depreciation, there is no general pattern to follow - perhaps it
would be kind to put a note on the documentation page.
--
Jody Garnett
On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 06:52, Kalén, Martin
to COG).
--
Jody Garnett
On Sun, 30 May 2021 at 13:23, Kalén, Martin wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We have been using GeoServer 2.16.x with s3-geotiff support (in turn
> supported by GeoTools) in a Docker-image for a customer’s WMS service,
> recently upgraded to GeoServer 2.1
he two interfaces.
--
Jody Garnett
On Tue, 25 May 2021 at 15:49, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Frank I expect this is a case of not being aggressive enough with updating
> interfaces in GeoTools.
>
> When FilterFactory2 was added we were very cautious about updating
> interfaces becau
nterface
and simplify the library.
--
Jody Garnett
On Sun, 16 May 2021 at 23:46, Frank Gasdorf via GeoTools-Devel <
geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I stumbled about the SLDParser while I wass looking for final field
> initializations with CommonFactory
GeoTools / GeoServer PMC meeting - 2021-05-25Attending
Andrea Aime
Jukka Rahkonnen
Kevin Smith
Torben Barsballe
Jody Garnett
Actions from last meeting:
-
TODO: Kevin is going to fix gwc release.rb using xpath or something
-
Kevin will look at GWC website upload
-
Jody
Thanks, I appreciate the clean up. Added some feedback for you to consider
on your PR.
--
Jody Garnett
On Fri, 21 May 2021 at 00:09, Roar Brænden
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently I got aware of a bug with the WMTS cascading. The bug appears
> whenever a url set for wmts have it's own
is prohibited. If you
>> have received this email by mistake, please notify
>> us immediately by telephone or e-mail.
>> ___
>> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
>> GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>>
> ___
> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
> GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>
--
--
Jody Garnett
___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
GeoTools/GeoWebCache/GeoServer PMC meeting - 2021-04-27Attending
Torben Barsballe
Kevin Smith
Jukka Rahkonnen
Jody Garnett
Andrea Aime
Actions from last meeting:
-
[DONE] AA: ask on the list about a 2.18.3 release manager
Agenda
1.
GSIP-202
2.
GWC release script
3
as a QA activity to clear up, and then turn it into a
hard failure.
Jody
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 1:21 AM Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 10:42 PM Jody Garnett
> wrote:
>
>> WARNING: Extension lookup 'ExtensionFilter', but ApplicationContext is
>> u
ing-beans-5.1.20.RELEASE.jar] using streaming
19-Mar-2021 14:38:08.206 INFO [main]
org.apache.tomcat.jakartaee.Migration.migrateStream Migration finished for
archive [WEB-INF/lib/spring-beans-5.1.20.RELEASE.jar]
...
The resulting application ran just fine ... which was kind of fun to
vel mailing list
> GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>
--
--
Jody Garnett
___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
A draft geotools blog post is ready for review, I have set it to
automatically publish tomorrow (so your review window is limited!)
--
Jody Garnett
On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 22:29, Jody Garnett wrote:
> The GeoTools 25-RC release candidate is started, artifacts available for
> testin
To update your local checkout:
git branch -m master main
git fetch upstream
git branch -u upstream/main main
--
Jody Garnett
On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 21:53, Jody Garnett wrote:
> I am going to start in on this activity tomorrow, and enable the build
> jobs as I go.
> --
> Jody Garn
GeoTools / GeoServer PMC meeting - 2021-03-02Attending
Kevin Smith
Torben Barsballe
Jody Garnett
Andrea AIme
Gabriel Roldan
Jukka Rahkonnen
Actions from last meeting:
-
[DONE] Gabe/Jody to have a relaxed release of 2.17.5 (over the weekend?)
-
[DONE] Kevin: Review GWC Gridset
I am going to start in on this activity tomorrow, and enable the build jobs
as I go.
--
Jody Garnett
On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 11:25, Ian Turton wrote:
> If we do one, then we should definitely do all three.
>
> Ian
>
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2021, 17:45 Jody Garnett, wrote:
>
>
In today's meeting geoServer is renaming master to main branch.
I would like to do the same for geotools also.
--
Jody Garnett
___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geo
.
--
Jody Garnett
___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
Hey mate,
For security issues it is good to try and contact project leadership and
seek a responsible disclosure policy.
For GeoTools we have a bi-weekly meeting (video chat) if you wish to look
at options with the team. A reminder is sent to the email list beforehand.
--
Jody Garnett
On Fri
u have any work in progress scheduled for this release please speak up!
--
Jody Garnett
___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
The GeoTools 23.5 release is started, artifacts available here for testing:
https://build.geoserver.org/view/release/job/geotools-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/build/release/distribution/23.5/
This is the last scheduled release for 23.x
--
Jody Garnett
GeoTools / GeoServer PMC meeting - 2021-02-16Attending
Kevin Smith
Torben Barsballe
Gabriel Roldan
Michel Gabriel
Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett
Jukka Rahkonnen
Actions from last meeting:
-
None
Agenda
1.
2.17.5 release without manager
2.
Adding 2x gridsets to GWC
3
I would like to schedule this activity with the upcoming release-candidate
(since we need to edit all the build jobs anyways).
--
Jody Garnett
On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 at 17:22, Jody Garnett wrote:
> It looks like we are good to rename the default branch to main:
> https://github.com/
tps://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Release-Schedule> if you have
availability.
--
Jody Garnett
___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
Ian:
We did look at this some time ago, cannot remember all the details.
- approach works best with a hidden repository so we can respect folks
privacy.
- if you wanted to pursue this we could setup a private osgeo
repository and set up the osgeo secretary with the tooling to manage.
--
Jody
I sent in
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/GeoTools-Budget-Request-2021
based on last meeting priorities.
The board is setup for a meeting tomorrow morning.
--
Jody Garnett
___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
It looks like we are good to rename the default branch to main:
https://github.com/github/renaming/blob/main/README.md
We were waiting on branch renaming on github ( to swap any open pull
requests from master to main).
--
Jody Garnett
___
GeoTools-Devel
Worth trying, we have a few cases where we already use varargs in a few
places and I like the increase in usability; apparently some caution is
needed when using varargs and generics together.
--
Jody Garnett
On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 at 10:40, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi,
> fiddling with Intelli
Is ArcSDE still for sale these days?
--
Jody Garnett
On Sat, 9 Jan 2021 at 01:46, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi all,
> the ArcSDE module has been in unsupported for a year, without any further
> change.
> While working on the PMD fixes on test classes, I've found I'd have to f
;
/**
* @deprecated Please use org.geotools.data.http.HTTPClient
*/
interface HTTPClient extends org.geotools.data.http.HTTPClient {
...
}
That can work :)
--
Jody Garnett
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 14:43, Roar Brænden wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've seen other mention not to use CommonFactoryFinder, and
Perfect, the proposal is starting to collect votes.
I had one thing to discuss, use of CommonFactoryFinder? It would be great
if use of this module can be independent of main, this would require
its own own HTTPFactoryFinder or similar.
--
Jody Garnett
On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 14:30, Roar Brænden
I outlined the proposal here
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/HTTPClient-Factory
I will ask for a review in tomorrow's meeting and trust we can get this
done ahead of the next release.
--
Jody Garnett
On Wed, 23 Dec 2020 at 16:15, Roar Brænden
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm
While reviewing Andrea's junit 3 --> 4 PR, I was once again struck by how
stale the validation extension is, I believe it has been over ten years
since this was used by geoserver or udig and can be considered for removal?
--
Jody Garnett
___
issemination or use of this
> e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please
> notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail.
> ___
> GeoTools-Dev
here you are using factory patterns
> a lot.
>
>
> > 23. des. 2020 kl. 23:46 skrev Jody Garnett :
> >
> > Roar:
> >
> > As you may have noticed in the meeting notes your HTTPClient ideas were
> discussed. As it has grown in the telling I agreed to write thi
anges.
Before I get going what is your feeling between "gt-http" and "gt-web"?
--
Jody Garnett
___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
GeoTools / GeoServer PMC meeting - 2020-12-22Attending
Torben Barsballe
Kevin Smith
Ian Turton
Jody Garnett
Andrea Aime
Jukka Rahkonnen
Alessandro Parma
Jim Hughes
Nuno Oliveira
Actions from last meeting:
-
[DONE] Thank Brad and Mark for the migration work :)
Agenda
1
+1
--
Jody Garnett
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 07:20, Daniele Romagnoli <
daniele.romagn...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> Hi Devs,
> I'm working on a bug involving CSS style translation to SLD.
> The fix would be in gt-xml adding a dependency to gt-cql but this will
> result
Looks good, should we merge this weekend (to avoid PR going stale?)
--
Jody Garnett
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 09:21, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Sorry I can't make it today (have to go in a few minutes), but I have
> fresh news: the unchecked warning GeoServer branch is ready to mer
Just wanted to thank Brad, and everyone who helped review PRs.
I think looking at the list
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/Migrate-Travis-builds list this
activity is now done!
--
Jody Garnett
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 at 10:34, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Important update from today's
Ian I can help with the GWC release
--
Jody Garnett
On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 01:53, Ian Turton wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 09:39, Andrea Aime
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> we are looking for a volunteer to cut the above releases . Any takers?
>>
>
> I
on jenkins.
Indeed we could grep the release notes to ensure they have been edited as
part of a release job to prevent mistake.
--
Jody Garnett
On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 01:53, Ian Turton wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 09:39, Andrea Aime
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
&g
have experience or
would like to learn please help!)
See https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/Migrate-Travis-builds for
details!
--
Jody Garnett
___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/lis
tended recipient is prohibited. If you
> have received this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by
> telephone or e-mail.*
> ___
> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
> GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/
formation to use statvfs. path:
> /media/ian/windows10vm, Error code: 13" when looking at the system status
> pages but nothing else obviously wrong.
>
> Ian
>
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 07:57, Jody Garnett wrote:
>
>> Alessandro:
>>
>> All good so far: tested b
!
aside: I have an additional "state of geoserver" presentation to share for
the release announcements
--
Jody Garnett
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 09:22, Alessandro Parma <
alessandro.pa...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> Hi All, Jody
>
> Artifacts are available for testing here
>
Epic Andrea! As for merge options, is it too many changes for a rebase?
--
Jody Garnett
On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 at 08:18, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi all,
> barring no objections, I plan to merge the branch into master during the
> next weekend.
> Was thinking of doing a normal merge, r
Sounds good, thanks.
--
Jody Garnett
On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 at 23:53, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi Jody,
> as long as you're just backporting upstream changes I don't see an issue,
> just make sure everything builds (and yes, I'm aware that it wasn't at all
> at the
above is not especially exciting, is it worth
committing these fixes to the older branches? Or should I let sleeping
branches rest.
--
Jody Garnett
___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists
Sorry I could not attend, comments inline.
>
>All: Volunteer for releases - 2.18.1 in November, 2.17.4 in December
>
>
I will do 2.18.1, will update the release schedule.
>
>-
>
>Anything else? Anyone that would like to work on a migration?
>
>
Not in a position to work on this, but
Thanks Torben:
I will be in a meeting at this time, I may drop in later if folks are
still online.
--
Jody Garnett
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 at 11:38, Torben Barsballe
wrote:
> Reminder that the next PMC meeting is scheduled for tomorrow, November 10,
> at 17:30
> <https://www.tim
OSGeo just announced it for ... Nov 17-19:
https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Virtual_Community_Sprint_2020
Not sure that is enough warning for us to attend?
<https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Virtual_Community_Sprint_2020>
--
Jody Garnett
On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 at 03:02, Ian Turton wrote:
Welcome George,
Additional plugins are very much welcomed and encouraged to work in the
geotools repository!
--
Jody Garnett
On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 at 19:52, George Dewar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Land Information NZ is considering using GeoServer with our survey and
> title system (Lando
That looks good!
The geoserver-devel mailing list details are here
http://geoserver.org/devel/
--
Jody Garnett
On Wed, 4 Nov 2020 at 09:47, Joseph Miller wrote:
> Andrea,
> As requested I have validated the CQL-Object capability with the GeoServer
> OGCAPI module. You can see m
il or the information
> herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
> have received this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by
> telephone or e-mail.*
> ___
> GeoTools-
We talked about a geoserver sprint earlier, waiting on CITE testing
infrastructure.
--
Jody Garnett
On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 at 03:02, Ian Turton wrote:
>
> Is there any interest in our participation in this sprint? Or do we want
> to try to organise our own similar virtual sprint
;>>>
>>>>>> The only real requirement
>>>>>> <https://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/procedures/create.html>
>>>>>> at this time is that you do not break the build, I will merge now.
>>>>>>
>>>>&g
Thanks for carefully digging into this, it does sound like a bug in the
streaming rendering code. The use of full xpath expressions is a bit
uncommon, so you will find and fix glitches like this as you are one of the
few groups to make use of the functionality.
--
Jody Garnett
On Tue, 29 Sep
GeoTools / GeoServer PMC meeting - 2020-09-29Attending
Torben Barsballe
Jukka Rahkonen
Kevin Smith
Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett
Actions from last meeting:
-
N/A
Agenda
1.
Releases status update
2.
GeoTools bin distribution
3.
Transfer of OSGeo Domains
4
in our developer guide
<https://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/procedures/supported.html>.
--
Jody Garnett
On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 08:12, Joseph Miller wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback. I made most of the changes suggested. Since
> this is an unsupported module is there a still p
sed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
>> otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by
>> European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this
>> e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the
This content will likely move to GitHub in the near future.
>
> Is this still true? or do the notes need updating?
>
> Ian
>
> --
> Ian Turton
>
>
> ___
>
> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
>
> GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourcefor
Looks good (checked bin download and docs), thanks for making the release.
Please keep in mind the announcement blog post has now moved to the website.
--
Jody Garnett
On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 at 05:59, Alessandro Parma <
alessandro.pa...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> G
Thanks, that is interesting, some feedback provided.
--
Jody Garnett
On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 at 12:49, Joseph Miller wrote:
> I have created an unsupported module for basic conversion of CQL-JSON into
> GeoTools Filters as discussed and am looking for feedback/guidance. The PR
> for t
Not yet, I will add to the draft blog post.
Also if we can make an effort to thank those who tested the release
candidate (including yourself) it would be very much appreciated.
--
Jody Garnett
On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 at 09:12, Ian Turton wrote:
> Is it there yet? I can make a link to it if it
erver one that would be great.
>
>
> --
> Ian Turton
>
>
> ___
>
> GeoTools-Devel mailing list
>
> GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>
> --
-
"yes" I am okay with a proposal to use of Map.
I had a look for the prior work, making a *ParameterMap
extend Map*, but could not find it.
--
Jody Garnett
On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 at 23:27, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi Jody,
> thanks fo the background info. So, are you ok with swit
I see a fair bit of action in the repository as fixes are backported to the
24.x branch, a reminder that the release planned for this Friday.
So far the release candidate feedback has been positive!
--
Jody Garnett
___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
looks like it is, backgroundImgStyleTest.json
<https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/master/modules/extension/mbstyle/src/test/resources/org/geotools/mbstyle/backgroundImgStyleTest.json>,
and I need to update the documentation.
--
Jody Garnett
On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 at 15:46, Torben Barsballe via GeoTools-
Happy to set you up with access, email sent separately.
I went through all the jobs again, and caught at least one inconsistency
between build group, and shared workspace used.
I hope it will now be fixed.
--
Jody Garnett
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 at 00:11, Frank Gasdorf
wrote:
> I tried to hav
ls/build/qa/checkstyle.xml'. ->
[Help 1]
The file in question is located in on the branch here:
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/23.x/build/qa/checkstyle.xml
Because this is a java11 job there is some steps to setup a "repo" and
"geotools" folder, so the "repo&qu
Query is a class, so we can make several constructors, breaking less code.
I agree that most code will be constructing queries, so I do not expect a
lot of breakage.
aside: I looked at JDBC ResultSet and paging and it uses int
--
Jody Garnett
On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 at 11:09, Andrea Aime
wrote
collection
*/
long size( boolean lenient )
The use of lenient above gives a different method signature and is in
agreement with CRS.decode method usage.
--
Jody Garnett
On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 at 10:55, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi Jody,
> I like this road, works fine for FeatureSource.
> W
y (several were
marked as "bugs" previously).
The draft blog post is ready for review, if there are any blog posts or
presentations to link to it would be appreciated.
--
Jody Garnett
On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 at 12:21, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 8:28 PM Jody Garnett
&
o 23.x series.
--
Jody Garnett
On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 at 07:34, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Andrea:
>
> Thanks, I am aware (and watched that build go :D ). The checks I was
> looking into were the packaging ones (links going to "stable", including
> license files, etc...).
&g
api migration and does not immediately break projects
when they upgrade. The size() name matches how Collections.size() handles a
size greater than the range of Integer.MAX_VALUE.
--
Jody Garnett
On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 at 06:43, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi, any other opinion on this?
>
> Per
ing on the blog post today, and then this release candidate
should be done.
--
Jody Garnett
On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 23:56, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi Jody,
> as a reminder, the release build has been doing for a while a "full build
> with empty repository" for you,
> so any ot
Did not spot anything obviously wrong with these bundles, proceeding with
GWC release
--
Jody Garnett
On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 at 23:44, Jody Garnett wrote:
> The GeoTools 24-RC artifacts are available for pre-flight testing:
>
>
> https://build.geoserver.org/job/geot
to have both it may be wise to treat it as a new datastore,
and have the factory choose between implementations (like shapefile
factory), or leave the previous implementation as a community module for
those still working with 5.6/5.7.
--
Jody Garnett
On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 08:51, Mark Prins wrote
The GeoTools 24-RC artifacts are available for pre-flight testing:
https://build.geoserver.org/job/geotools-release/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/build/release/distribution/24-RC/
--
Jody Garnett
___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel
com/github/renaming#later-this-year> to rename the default
branch from master to main branch.
--
Jody Garnett
___
GeoTools-Devel mailing list
GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
tion to make
this easier and less reliant on reading all the javadocs.
--
Jody Garnett
On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 at 04:56, Ian Turton wrote:
> I've often wondered as to why that needs to be a Serializable, an object
> makes sense to me.
>
> Ian
>
> On Sun, 30 Aug 2020, 09:07
Gabe did the initial work if I remember, but that was a long while ago,
please feel free to dive in!
--
Jody Garnett
On Sat, 29 Aug 2020 at 12:07, Joseph Miller via GeoTools-Devel <
geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> I am interested in contributing some hours on keeping
I moved Jim's experiment to its own PR here
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/3126
It this passes tests, and looks good to you, please merge.
--
Jody Garnett
On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 at 16:11, Jody Garnett wrote:
>
> Yes Jim was experimenting.
>
> Should make a Pr for tha
Yes Jim was experimenting.
Should make a Pr for that upgraded distro now that we know the approach
works.
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 1:59 AM Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 1:58 AM Jody Garnett
> wrote:
>
>> I ran into this for a recent PR
>> https://github.
old version openjdk version "11.0.2" 2019-01-15,
can we somehow update our configuration to use a newer openjdk 11?
(If not then yes please we should skip this).
--
Jody Garnett
On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 02:33, Ian Turton wrote:
> That one passes locally for me on Ubuntu 20.04 with Jav
Please let me know if you have any outstanding fixes or PRs to make it in
for the release candidate.
Sorry for the maven repo disruption this week, reach out if your PR needs
help building.
--
Jody Garnett
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 at 00:52, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi all,a reminder that GeoTools
);
Or:
int count = (int) featureSource.getCount(query);
If you really want Java 8 has Math.toIntExact method, that produces an
exception if the long is out of range:
int count = Math. toIntExact( featureSource.getCount(query) );
--
Jody Garnett
On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 10:06, Andrea Aime
wrote
Some of the geoserver vendor parameters are implemented as hints:
https://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/user/services/wms/vendor.html
Others are controlled by the geoserver administrator during setup (as
presumably they know if their data requires advanced projection handling).
--
Jody Garnett
I think the idea is to kick out docs quick if it is only a text change.
Perhaps I can schedule this after the main build also to account for API
change.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 10:34 AM Andrea Aime
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 7:28 PM Jody Garnett
> wrote:
>
>> So no rea
ools/job/geotools-23.x-docs/
Summary:
The docs completed before the main build because they were in different
build groups?
--
Jody Garnett
On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 at 02:44, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Hi,
> anyone noticed this build persistently failing?
>
> https://build.geoserver.org/
the library for Java 11 compatibility
<http://geotoolsnews.blogspot.com/2019/01/geotools-java-11-code-sprint-results.html>
.
--
Jody Garnett
On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 at 09:26, Jody Garnett wrote:
> I appreciate you signing up to our email list to contact us directly, we
> do get a num
source makes it a fascinating subject for
research. It is a shame so many of these surveys look at design / qa /
development tools .. and do not explore the communication / funding /
collaboration aspects that have a larger impact on sustainability and open
source longevity.
--
Jody Garnett
On Wed
No direct relationship, although it is a good practice to look at PROJ when
writing a new geotools projection (so if you found a bug it can be worth a
cross check).
--
Jody Garnett
On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 14:57, Phil Scadden wrote:
> Is there any relationship between the geotools proj libr
-SNAPSHOT
geotools revision = 7d31d379fc9e7ecb19ccef9fd5759916e33d97e0
geowebcache version = 1.17-SNAPSHOT
geowebcache revision = a0645dfc5497bd66debbee96d6f0a4ec31ab505d/a0645
hudson build = -1
New release now deployed etc... sorry for the rough ride :)
--
Jody Garnett
On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 at 09
That is really funny, and your PR looks good.
--
Jody Garnett
On Wed, 22 Jul 2020 at 06:17, Andrea Aime
wrote:
> Well,
> given the issue arises because importer pom.xml depends on ArcSDE, and it
> should really not,
> this is the simplest solution:
>
> https://github.com/g
?id=565408> (it seems to be
under quite active development as an eclipse plugin).
Thanks to James for joining the hunt to figure out the transitive
dependency issue and help determine a course of action.
--
Jody Garnett
On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 at 10:04, Torben Barsballe
wrote:
> Attending
>
GeoTools 23.2 release anouncement ready for review.
--
Jody Garnett
On Sun, 19 Jul 2020 at 18:49, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Download bundles look as expected (although I had to retry the downloads a
> couple of times).
> Does anyone else have trouble downloading from the build server?
&
ightly geoserver build
(since we are still waiting to hear about restoring cite testing).
--
Jody Garnett
On Sun, 19 Jul 2020 at 17:18, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Release training proceeded with:
>
> version = 2.17-SNAPSHOT
> git revision = 1ee183d9af205080f1543dc94616bbe3b3e4f890
> git
301 - 400 of 8549 matches
Mail list logo
