On Fri, 23 Jun 2000 00:50:13 +1000, the world broke into rejoicing as
Robert Graham Merkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I'd seen the fact that Guile 1.4 existed mentioned somewhere, but it's
> now announced on freshmeat.
>
> Release announcement is at:
>
> htt
I'd seen the fact that Guile 1.4 existed mentioned somewhere, but it's
now announced on freshmeat.
Release announcement is at:
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/guile/2000-06/msg00198.html
I suppose we should find out w
gt;
> > I don't think this is as big an issue as you might think. The average
> > balance report is probably doing the most calculations of any report,
> > and it is pretty speedy, even on large data files.
>
> I can't recall the speed of guile ever being a live
I "saw fit" to see about adding GnuCash to the Guile-related projects;
information submission listed below...
--- Forwarded Message
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 3861 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2000 16:41:58 -
Receiv
It's been rumoured that LE NY Yannick said:
>
> Take a look at this page:
> http://www.freshmeat.net/news/2000/04/01/954615693.html
lapin lapin
--
Gnucash Developer's List
To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In regard to: about scheme and guile in the future, LE NY Yannick said (at...:
>Take a look at this page:
>http://www.freshmeat.net/news/2000/04/01/954615693.html
>
>RMS said:
>"We've abandoned Scheme, and will slowly be removing Guile from all our
>projects over t
On Sun, 02 Apr 2000 20:56:12 -, the world broke into rejoicing as
LE NY Yannick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Take a look at this page:
> http://www.freshmeat.net/news/2000/04/01/954615693.html
>
> RMS said:
> "We've abandoned Scheme, and will slowly be removin
Take a look at this page:
http://www.freshmeat.net/news/2000/04/01/954615693.html
RMS said:
"We've abandoned Scheme, and will slowly be removing Guile from all our
projects over the course of this summer. We had to find an extension
language to replace it. I looked at Perl, Python, Ei
> Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Unfortunately, this problem illustrates the fact that upgrading with
> > guile-1.3.4-2 will not be a panacea. The 1.3.4 rpm does not install
> > the link to slib, while the 1.3 rpm does.
> >
> > I am
Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Unfortunately, this problem illustrates the fact that upgrading with
> guile-1.3.4-2 will not be a panacea. The 1.3.4 rpm does not install
> the link to slib, while the 1.3 rpm does.
>
> I am going to try and remove the dependen
> >
> > Put a symlink named 'slib' in /usr/share/guile that points to
> > /usr/lib/umb-scheme/slib. You may need to run gnucash once as
> > root.
> >
> > dave
>
>
> Dave,
>
> Thanks, that did it. I just didn't know where gn
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Dave Peticolas wrote:
> Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 13:10:34 -0800
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Guile and Slib
>
> >
> > OK, I managed to fix the configure guile parts problem. I apparently
OK, I managed to fix the configure guile parts problem. I apparently also
needed the 1.3.4-2 of guile-devel. I installed that and configure ran fine.
Now, gnucash seems to compile The only error I get is about a questionable
"makeinfo", but I always get that. But after I compile a
I tried to compile the latest cvs of gnucash. I got an error and saw that it
was the same error I saw mentioned here (about having the latest guile). I
downloaded the latest guile from the gnucash web site (1.3.4-6) and
installed it. No problem.
Now I get this error during configure:
checking
For everyone writing reports, you should know that your report file is
only loaded once. This means that any global variables you use will
only be initialized once.
Thus, any global variables which you change must be re-initialized
in the report generation function. Also, you can have the same r
>
> In recent versions of guile, libreadline is no longer linked directly
> or enabled by default, but as we all know, it's quite nice to have
> during development. If you'd like to turn it back on, and you didn't
> find the tidbit buried in the NEWS file, all yo
In recent versions of guile, libreadline is no longer linked directly
or enabled by default, but as we all know, it's quite nice to have
during development. If you'd like to turn it back on, and you didn't
find the tidbit buried in the NEWS file, all you need to do is execut
> > [about ny troubles with slib]
>...
> If you install guile-1.3 you should get a /usr/local/share/guile/1.3
> directory. In this dir create a subdir slib and copy the .scm files to
> that subdir.
Thank you. And thanks to the other people that replied too. This is
what I
teri wrote:
> The guile tarball I got has no such file and the slib docs don't say anything
> about guile. Given that all I want to do is run gnucash and don't
> particularly care about doing anything fancy with guile/slib, can I just
> copy the scm files someplace wher
> The guile tarball I got has no such file and the slib docs don't say anything
> about guile. Given that all I want to do is run gnucash and don't
> particularly care about doing anything fancy with guile/slib, can I just
> copy the scm files someplace where guile will f
>
> ...
>
> If you have installed guile, you already have a complete Scheme
> system. That's what guile is - a Scheme interpreter designed for
> easy embedding in other programs.
Ok. Thanks.
> slib works fine with guile. As well as the slib documentation, you
> >
> > ...
> >
> > If you have installed guile, you already have a complete Scheme
> > system. That's what guile is - a Scheme interpreter designed for
> > easy embedding in other programs.
>
> Ok. Thanks.
>
> > slib works
Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Speaking of which, when I moved to guile 1.3.4, I lost my nice
> readline interface in using the guile interpreter. Is there
> something you need to do to turn it back on?
They've moved it out to a separate module in response to
On 02 Jan 2000 14:01:31 CST, the world broke into rejoicing as
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Christopher Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I don't see one in scwm; a quick browse through the docs doesn't show
> > off an "eval" anywhere.
>
> I think it's actually called scwmrep
> This approach would have the advantage of giving you a nice readline
> interface with command history for free. You'd still have the problem
Speaking of which, when I moved to guile 1.3.4, I lost my
nice readline interface in using the guile interpreter.
Is there something you ne
Christopher Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't see one in scwm; a quick browse through the docs doesn't show
> off an "eval" anywhere.
I think it's actually called scwmrepl (there's also a one-shot
scwmexec, I think). I don't have scwm installed ATM, so I'm not sure.
I'm running sawmi
anipulate the data structures by hand or by
> >script whilst the program is running. Until someone hacks a Guile
> >Listener into GnuCash, the ability to hack on the data from the UNIX
> >side of things is Very Valuable.
>
> Could we talk a bit more here about w
I am trying to upgrade the FreeBSD port of gnucash, but am having a
problem -- the "All the World's Linux" problem.
It seems that guile and guile-config will only be detected if it is in
/usr/bin. Since 90% of the Unix world puts guile in /usr/local, I think
think the configure.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The problem with SRFI's is that they still won't provide you with a
> standard way of requesting facilities, e.g. - things like (require)
> which is different from the DrScheme equivalent.
True, though my guess is that that'll be the subject of a future SRFI.
For now
On 09 Aug 1999 00:17:53 CDT, the world broke into rejoicing as
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > What struck me Friday morning was that I really should be
> > marshalling data into somewhat more organized "structures" rather
> > than just building assoc lis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> What struck me Friday morning was that I really should be
> marshalling data into somewhat more organized "structures" rather
> than just building assoc lists.
[ General agreement. ]
> I also finally grokked define-struct, and maybe am looking at is as
> a "hammer,"
I'm starting to look Rather More Seriously at understanding the transaction
engine.
This is encouraging me to establish sets of data structures on the Guile side
of the world to represent data in the two quite distinct forms:
a) QIF's "bunch of transactions that get attache
It's been rumoured that Carey Stevens said:
>
> gnucash: bootstrap file is /usr/share/gnucash/scm/bootstrap.scm
> guile: Stack overflow
>
> The guile on my system is version 1.2
You need guile 1.3
--linas
- %< &g
is /usr/share/gnucash/scm/bootstrap.scm
> > guile: Stack overflow
> >
> > The guile on my system is version 1.2
>
> You need guile 1.3
>
> --linas
- %< >% --
The GnuCash / X-Accountant Mailing List
To unsubscribe
ootstrap file is /usr/share/gnucash/scm/bootstrap.scm
> guile: Stack overflow
>
> The guile on my system is version 1.2
>
> Does anybody know what the problem is, or have any suggestions?
Your guile is too old. Check the README. You need 1.3 or better.
--
Rob Brownin
Hi,
I have just compiled and installed motif gnucash-1.2.0 on an out of the
box Redhat 5.2 system on a Pentium Pro with 64M RAM. It compiled fine,
however when I try to run it I get only the following
gnucash: bootstrap file is /usr/share/gnucash/scm/bootstrap.scm
guile: Stack overflow
The
On Thu, 17 Jun 1999, Stephen Grant Brown wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I run
> rpm -U --force --nodeps guile-1.3-6.i386
> on my box.
first of all, why did you forced the install?
>
> I then run
> tar xzf gnucash-1.1.27.tar.gz
> cd gnucash-1.1.27
>
Hi All,
I run
rpm -U --force --nodeps guile-1.3-6.i386
on my box.
I then run
tar xzf gnucash-1.1.27.tar.gz
cd gnucash-1.1.27
./configure
and got the following
checking for guile... checking for guile...
configure: error: Cannot link with guile. Do
After a lot of playing around, I finally got the guile side working in
a way that makes me happy. We've even got really nice automatic C
header generation from the independent specification file. Now I
don't know if everyone's going to be completely comfortable with that,
but it
Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I get no other messages at all. Trying to start up the guile interpreter
> gives me the same message, so something is not quite right with guile.
> Since I've got no knowlege of Scheme or guile I wondered whether someone
> else had se
On Mon, 26 Apr 1999, Jeremy Collins wrote:
> Rob Browning is the expert on the guile code. I believe that he is busy
> right now. I'm sure that if you give it a few days he will probably
> help you out. I would help but I haven't a clue what the problem is.
> Does it s
/prefs.scm
# ERROR: In procedure gsubr-apply in expression (scm-error (quote
misc-error) #f ...):
# ERROR: Could not find slib/require.scm in
("/usr/local/share/guile/site" "/usr/local/share/guile/1.3"
"/usr/local/share/guile" ".")
# dell: {274} cd
I have g
br-apply in expression (scm-error (quote
> misc-error) #f ...):
> # ERROR: Could not find slib/require.scm in
> ("/usr/local/share/guile/site" "/usr/local/share/guile/1.3"
> "/usr/local/share/guile" ".")
> # dell: {274} cd
>
> I have guil
On Sun, 21 Feb 1999, teri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having a pretty hard time getting gnucash 1.1.26 to even configure with
> all the accessory programs it needs. The point where I'm stuck now is
> guile. I've installed guile in /usr/local. The ld.so.conf file kn
ce. I noticed that
>configure used to take --with-guile= (now commented) but now the
>automated code can't find whatever library it needs that contains
>rl_deprep_term_function, dlerror, rm_instream, etc...
The various rl_ functions are from the readline library and the dl* are
f
Hi,
I'm having a pretty hard time getting gnucash 1.1.26 to even configure with
all the accessory programs it needs. The point where I'm stuck now is
guile. I've installed guile in /usr/local. The ld.so.conf file knows
about /usr/local/lib and I've done an ldconfig.
teri wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm having a pretty hard time getting gnucash 1.1.26 to even configure with
> all the accessory programs it needs. The point where I'm stuck now is
> guile. I've installed guile in /usr/local. The ld.so.conf file knows
> about /usr
slib is missing in your system. The simplest way is to install umb-scheme
(from a rpm) and make a symbolic link from /usr/lib/umb-scheme/slib (or
wherever umb-scheme is installed) to /usr/local/share/guile/slib
best regards,
alex.
On Sun, 14 Feb 1999, Amir Marrei wrote:
> Hi
>
>
Hi
I sent a message about my guile/gnucash problem while ago but don't know if it
ever made it to the list.
Anyway, here is the message I get after having done a make motif after
following the steps as described in the Suse-readme:
bash-2.02# gnucash
gnucash: startup-dir is /usr/local/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Well, I think I'm at least partly to blame for teh state of things.
> I had this vision that somehow, magically, by using guile and/or perl,
> certain things would get simpler and easier. Wether that vision has any
> validity .. I guess we'
Hi Jeremy,
It's been rumoured that Jeremy Collins said:
> I am curious about
> the uses of the Guile code.
[...]
> Also what is wrapped? I assume just the engine, as the rest seems hard
> to wrap. Is wrap the right word anyway? hehe
Well, I think I'm at least partly
For those interested in playing around with the guile stuff, here's a
few functions I wrote for manipulating accounts and transactions...
These will probably show up in src/scm at some point, but you can play
around with them now.
To get started, you can do this:
$ gnucash --shell
Hiya all,
Hopefully Rob, or someone can easily answer this. I am curious about
the uses of the Guile code. I was wondering if it is theoretically
possible to use Gnucash-motif, and Gnome-guile to create a Gnome version
of the program. Which would also mean that it is possible to extend
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I tried hacking around this but everything I tried didn't work.
> Any ideas?
Don't waste any more time. I've got it fixed. I'll send a patch soon.
--
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
- %< -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I'm running guile 1.3 and I don't have qthreads and it works fine.
I think it proabably depends on whether or not you compiled guile with
threads support. If you did, then I think it needs qthreads.
> > We need one more case that has -lqthre
On Thu, November 19 1998, Ron Forrester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|It seems to me that we can just unconditionally add -ltermcap to the
|configure. For those platforms that don't need it, it shouldn't hurt
|(linker won't include and objects from it, right?)
At least with Debian, there is no libt
It's been rumoured that Amos Shapira said:
>
> gnucash: startup-file is NONE/share/gnucash/scm/startup/init.scm
> guile: No such file or directory: "NONE/share/gnucash/scm/startup/init.scm"
>
> I think I tracked it down to lines 2504 and 2505 of "c
It's been rumoured that Rob Browning said:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > I think I just fixed this in the latest cvs source.
>
> Nope. You've got -ltermcap in all the cases that also have
> -lqthreads. Since guile 1.3 requires libqthreads, and sinc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I think I just fixed this in the latest cvs source.
Nope. You've got -ltermcap in all the cases that also have
-lqthreads. Since guile 1.3 requires libqthreads, and since Debian
doesn't have libtermcap, none of the cases will succeed.
We need one m
Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm aware not everyone here are Debian users, but if that's any indication,
> there was a mention of this problem on the debian-devel mailing list.
> There are two points main points I picked up from this:
>
> 1. 1.3 is still considered sort of "experim
Amos Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm not sure how relevant this is, but Debian's old termcap libs'
> description say that you can just link with the new ncurses to get an
> API emulation of libtermcap. I just did "s/termcap/ncurses/" and it
> seemed to help the compilation.
Actually,
> > gnucash: startup-file is /usr/local/share/gnucash/scm/startup/init.scm
> > guile: Stack overflow
I vaguely remeber this as being typical of a guile 1.2 setup ...
--linas
- %< >% --
The GnuCash / X-Accountant Mailing L
On Thu, November 19 1998, Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|Ron Forrester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
|
|> Thanks to linas, I am past my configure problems (under slackware,
|> apparently termcap is needed for the guile tests).
|
|Ah, looking back through the list, I f
On Thu, November 19 1998, Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
|
|I wanted to know because I'd sort of like to make guile1.3 the first
|"official" version we support. There's an ugly hack or two for 1.2
|and 1.3a that I'd like to drop, but I didn't want to do that if it
|would affect very ma
Ron Forrester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It seems to me that we can just unconditionally add -ltermcap to the
> configure. For those platforms that don't need it, it shouldn't hurt
> (linker won't include and objects from it, right?)
No, on systems that don't have the library at all, the link
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > These depend on ${datadir}, which depends on ${prefix} which doesn't
> > get set at this point (unless if they are set from the command line),
> > and defaults to 'NONE'. Adding a (redundant) "--prefix=/usr/local"
> > configure's command line fixed t
Rob Browning wrote:
>
> I wanted to know because I'd sort of like to make guile1.3 the first
> "official" version we support. There's an ugly hack or two for 1.2
> and 1.3a that I'd like to drop, but I didn't want to do that if it
> would affect very many people.
>
> Thanks
>
I am using an ol
> > Thanks to linas, I am past my configure problems (under slackware,
> > apparently termcap is needed for the guile tests).
>
> Ah, looking back through the list, I found this, so it's RedHat that
> needs libtermcap.
Actually, its Slackware, not RedHat -- at least th
ld love to make 1.3 the standard. I had it installed, but
couldn't get configure to finish, so instead installed the guile-core
from the ftp site.
rjf&
- %< >% --
The GnuCash / X-Accountant Mailing List
To unsubscribe, send mail to [E
It's been rumoured that Rob Browning said:
>
> Ron Forrester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> > Thanks to linas, I am past my configure problems (under slackware,
> > apparently termcap is needed for the guile tests).
>
> Ah, looking back through th
st get the following when I run it:
>
> |butch| gnucash
> gnucash: startup-file is /usr/local/share/gnucash/scm/startup/init.scm
> guile: Stack overflow
> |butch|
Hmm, now this one I don't know about. Does it work from the build
directory when run like this?
Ron Forrester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks to linas, I am past my configure problems (under slackware,
> apparently termcap is needed for the guile tests).
Ah, looking back through the list, I found this, so it's RedHat that
needs libtermcap.
Does anyone have any good
I wanted to know because I'd sort of like to make guile1.3 the first
"official" version we support. There's an ugly hack or two for 1.2
and 1.3a that I'd like to drop, but I didn't want to do that if it
would affect very many people.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP=E80E0D04F52
Danny Backx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I've had a couple of free minutes, and I've figured out where this
problem is, and it's nasty. The problem is that I (and others) were
using guile 1.2 and guile 1.3a which required the manual loading of
boot-9.scm.
It looks like gui
ooked for under --with-xmhtml-includes (and to a
lesser degree, --with-xmhtml-libraries). An instruction to give
absolute path names would also prevnt confusion, IMHO.
When it runs, it complained with:
gnucash: startup-file is NONE/share/gnucash/scm/startup/init.scm
guile: No such file or directo
gt; string-append in expression (string-append gnc:_startup-dir-default_ "/" ...):
> ./share/scm/startup/init.scm:32:24: Unbound variable: gnc:_startup-dir-default_
>
> I'm using guile-1.3 and swig-1.1p5.
- %< >%
/init.scm:32:24: Unbound variable: gnc:_startup-dir-default_
I'm using guile-1.3 and swig-1.1p5.
If I hardcode gnc:_startup-dir-default_ into init.scm, I get
./gnucash
gnucash: startup-file is ./share/scm/startup/init.scm
loading startup file ./share/scm/startup/utilities.scm
loading startup file
On 21 Oct 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I don't have guile installed,
> and the gnucash installation breaks because of that.
>
> Does that mean, I have to install guile?
You have to install. Get source rpm from redhat contrib (if SuSE does not
have one), rebuild and in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Does that mean, I have to install guile?
Yes. Guile is now mandatory. I thought I had an AC_MSG_ERROR in
configure.in about that. Perhaps someone changed it to WARN back when
the guile stuff was just getting started, but I'd say that now it
should be chan
I don't have guile installed,
and the gnucash installation breaks because of that.
Does that mean, I have to install guile?
I don't really mind, but ...
Actually I did:
make motif
- %< >% --
The GnuCash / X-Accountant
The gnucash ftp site has a version that is sufficient to get it to compile.
ftp://ftp.gnucash.org/pub/gnucash/extra_libs/TAR/guile-core-19980818.tar.gz
Enjoy.
-Scott
Bruce Z. Lysik writes:
> Hi folks!
>
> In an attempt to get the latest version of GnuCash installed, I've
Hi folks!
In an attempt to get the latest version of GnuCash installed, I've run
into a wall.
The README states that version 1.3 or higher of guile is required, yet
all I can find is 1.2.
Do I have to go into the CVS tree of guile and grab the latest
development version to satisfy
401 - 482 of 482 matches
Mail list logo
