I have opened a change request for this :
http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/issues/detail?id=4400
Feel free to support it ... please
On Friday, 31 August 2012 20:17:56 UTC+2, sgiddings wrote:
Is there any plans to update this service to have the same functionality
as the Directions
Is there any plans to update this service to have the same functionality as
the Directions API javascript service ?
At present, the web service will treat all waypoints as stopover points.
However, I am needing pass through waypoints as is available in the
javascript service.
Any ideas ?
--
Over the last two years, I have developed a web site using the v3
javascript maps api.
I am now in the process of developing the equivalent functionality in a
native android app using the native Maps Api.
I am at the stage where I am incorporating the itinerary functionality.
Knowing that there
I have been developing an application using the Google Maps Javascript Api
v3 for over a year now.
I am now faced with the need to produce an android device version.
So I started to look at the Maps Api in the Android SDK - it is almost
empty.
- no directions service
- no region biasing for
Thank you for your reply Barry,
However, how can I reproduce other aspects such as line, polyline and
polygon drawing based on lat/lng coordonnates ?
Are there any full examples for creating real world mapping applications in
the same manner as with the v3 javascript api ?
--
You received
Has this been removed ?
The Google Groups membership panel still show it as being available ...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Maps JavaScript API v3 group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Hi Geoff,
I haven't started testing on an IPad (other than on my daughters who
is simply visiting).
I don't own one, so I started searching for advice.
As usual, the most prolific comments are negative.
My site works on Safari (PC/MAC), but knowing that there are only
fingers or a stylus for
After my (short) research, there would appear to be a large number of
problems trying to run the API in Safari on IPad 2.
Are there any known techniques to getting the API to work properly -
including all aspects of map navigation and zooming ?
Are there any tutorials for adapting an API v3 web
After having defined a position for a marker, I put the pegman on
the road next to it ... it simply shows empty fields.
Here is the lat/lng : 46.2394, 3.2297
Which shows a Château in France in satellite view and is the official
geolocalisation for the Château.
This has the same behaviour in
Since version 3.7, infowindows no-longer have rounded corners.
That said, it is probable that some of us still want rounded corners
and do not want to create a custom overlay just to reproduce this.
Is it possible to access the css used to create the infowindow to be
able to add a css
Ok guys, I obviously had not investigated far enough.
Thanks for these clarifications.
On Nov 17, 11:10 am, Rossko ros...@culzean.clara.co.uk wrote:
The resulting lat/lng pair, when used to place a marker, puts it in
the empty space next to the road.
It's not indicating empty space - have
Can you please confirm that version 3.6 is now feature stable and
version 3.7 is the current development/nightly build version ?
I don't remember seeing an official announcement for this, however.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Maps
a quick
demo:http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/javascript/examples/pl...
By typing orange france I get the correct result straight away.
Nevertheless, I've filed this problem with the data team.
Chris
--http://twitter.com/broady
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 7:01 PM, sgiddings
-Unis
Consulate General of France, 7657 Mt Carmel Dr, Orlando, Floride
32835-8164, États-Unis
France Pavilion, France Service Rd, Bay Lake, Floride 32836, États-
Unis
Something is seriously wrong here !
Simon
On Oct 14, 9:06 am, sgiddings mr.s.giddi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Chris,
Posted
Nice tip Pil.
However, this is not really an acceptable situation.
Taking into account that work has been undertaken by Google to improve
coverage in Europe, notably in France, this should not occur.
Our users will not have the reflex to do this kind of manipulation -
which will give a bad image
One further piece of information -
I have not requested the places library at all !
On Aug 17, 10:16 am, sgiddings mr.s.giddi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Chris,
Just been looking at this to be able to disable clicking on google
located pois.
Use the Styled Map Wizard to generate the required code
investigations
Simon
On Aug 17, 11:02 am, Chris Broadfoot c...@google.com wrote:
Are you able to make a quick demo page? Or tell me which airport you are
looking at.
--http://twitter.com/broady
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 6:16 PM, sgiddings mr.s.giddi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Chris,
Just
Within my site, I give the user the ability to click on the map to
place a marker.
When this is done, I then go and do a reverse geocode to get the
address of the location.
However, if the user clicks in the sea, the reverse geocode will
return the nearest land address without any indication that
Thanks for this Rossko.
Sounds like a work-around really.
Would it not be more reasonable to have the reverse geocode result
indicate that the requested lat/lng is in fact over the sea ?
On Jul 22, 11:29 am, Rossko ros...@culzean.clara.co.uk wrote:
Is there a way to determine if a given lat/lng
Alignements,
56340 Carnac, France.
This makes validation of geocoding more difficult!
On Jul 18, 11:40 am, sgiddings mr.s.giddi...@gmail.com wrote:
When I try to encode this address :
74, avenue des Druides, 56342 Carnac
with the Geocoding service of the maps api, it returns the correct
position
Thanks for this Chris,
I have added a comment to the change/enhancement request.
On Jul 18, 2:41 am, Chris Broadfoot c...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 6:15 PM, sgiddings mr.s.giddi...@gmail.com wrote:
If maps v3 no longer requires a key, shouldn't the earth utility
library
When I try to encode this address :
74, avenue des Druides, 56342 Carnac
with the Geocoding service of the maps api, it returns the correct
position without any problem.
lat/lng: 47.57361320, -3.07203240
However, when I encode with the Geocoding web service, it returns the
following location :
Hello,
Interesting post and thoroughly misleading example !
The example simply states that all you have to do is just instantiate
a new GoogleEarth object.
After further reading, it would appear that all you have to do
is
1. sign up for a jsapi key
2. include the jsapi script in your page
I am rather disappointed to have had no reply to this.
Should I be addressing this question in another forum ?
Is it not in Googles interest to give clear advice for this subject -
Google Maps Api - Google Indexing ?
Perhaps a Google person could reply - Chris ?
On Jun 15, 5:39 pm, sgiddings
I have my site up and running (although not all of the POIs are
registered yet) -
http://www.letrajet.com
I, obviously, need to get it correctly indexed by Google now.
The content is dynamic and changes based on user input, with all poi
data coming in via AJAX and displayed in infowindows
Great news, thank you.
This comes at just the right time for me!
On Jun 1, 8:21 am, Thor Mitchell (Google Employee) t...@google.com
wrote:
Hi all,
We're currently rolling out updated Map data for France, Monaco, and
Luxembourg across Google Maps and the Maps API as detailed in this blog
Ok, after further investigation, this does not happen with the standard
infowindow.
So, there would appear to be something being done by the standard infowindow
which blocks the mouseover event getting to underlying markers.
What is being done ?
--
You received this message because you are
Hi Keith,
If I am understanding you correctly, you are wanting to invent an extra
variable and attach it to the javascript object which represents the marker.
The answer to your question is yes.
You can indeed dynamically create new variables on an existing javascript
object and then
Well !!!
Considering the extensive interest that this subject has provoked, here is
the solution to this problem (if anyone really cares).
It is necessary to capture the following mouse events in the custom overlay
info window -
- mouseover
- mousemove
- mousedown
- mouseup
- click
The capture
The javascript object is deleted by the normal javascript garbage collection
when there are no more references to it.
Therefore -
marker.setMap(null);
marker = null;
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Maps JavaScript API v3 group.
To post to
Yes, you are right and wrong.
The api uses canvas objects (if available) to render markers, unless you
specifically tell it not to via the optimised option.
As you are limited to using the marker creation interface, you do not
directly create any DOM elements. This is all handled for you
Here's my context -
I have a custom information window implemented with a custom overlay
(OverlayView).
As usual, when the marker is clicked, the custom information window is
displayed.
At times, it will cover other markers.
In addition, I have a custom tooltip on the marker which is triggered
I omitted to mention that I put the custom overlay in the floatPane.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Maps JavaScript API v3 group.
To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group,
As per Rossko's suggestion, I have opened an enhancement issue :
http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/issues/detail?id=3266
On Apr 25, 10:28 pm, Rossko ros...@culzean.clara.co.uk wrote:
By this I mean that, when a map is zoomed in or out, the marker is scaled
*first
*and then the map
I have just opened an enhancement issue for the marker layer -
http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/issues/detail?id=3266
The main object is to disable marker zooming when rendered within
canvas elements.
This is because, when zooming out, markers are overly enlarged giving
an ugly user
By this I mean that, when a map is zoomed in or out, the marker is scaled
*first
*and then the map is scaled.
This leads to marks being overly scaled when zooming out with the mouse
wheel and is rather ugly.
Should this be considered as a bug ?
Is there a workaround ?
--
You received this
I have a similar problem.
I use two methods to obtain a shape with a hole in it.
The shape is either a donut or a polygon.
The problem is perfectly demonstrated here -
http://www.geocodezip.com/v3_polygon_example_donut.html
As you can see, the inner circle is no longer empty.
The same situation
Thanks Andrew,
Shame that google pushed out this change before announcing it.
I saw the effect at least 2 days ago !
Simon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Maps JavaScript API v3 group.
To post to this group, send email to
You raise an important point here Barry.
However, I am not aiming for accessibility here (at least not at the
moment).
So, what can I do short of creating a parallel, non map, site
containing all my data - which would rather defeat the purpose of what
I have done upto now ?
On Apr 9, 1:45 am,
Can anyone give me some advice (or point me in the right direction) on how
to get a map based site correctly indexed ?
To be more clear : I am developing a map site which will only display poi
information inside classic info-windows or custom info windows.
At present, the only way to access the
I could not find a group specific to this api, so I am posting my
question here
Within the documentation, it specifies that there is an enforced
number of queries per 24 hours.
Is this limit calculated by time - ie between 00:00:00 and 23:59:59 ?
If so, within which time zone ?
I would
In the case where I have to run my importation process a number of
times, knowing when the 24 hour boundary is will help me to determine
when I can run the import.
As far as the terms are concerned
10.3 - permits me to store my poi reference data so that I do not need
to geocode my +20k markers
Thanks Andrew,
I somewhat expected this.
On Mar 25, 11:41 am, Andrew Leach andrew.leac...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 March 2011 10:20, sgiddings mr.s.giddi...@gmail.com wrote:
In the case where I have to run my importation process a number of
times, knowing when the 24 hour boundary
Hi Chris,
Thanks for the clarification.
One further - related - question : will dynamically changing the zIndex (via
setZIndex) cause a redraw, visually raising or lowering the marker ?
Simon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Maps JavaScript
as expected!
Definitely a bug -- zindex of draggable markers isn't behaving as
expected when optimized is true (the new default).
Gary
On Mar 18, 6:21 am, sgiddings mr.s.giddi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Chris,
Ok, sample whipped up !http://www.pumaproductions.fr/google/markerzindex.htm
Hi Chris,
Ok, sample whipped up !
http://www.pumaproductions.fr/google/markerzindex.htm
From further tests, it would appear related to the use of the 'draggable'
property.
This leads me to the following question : would changing the draggable
property dynamically (through setDraggable) affect
Hi Chris,
Ok, I will need to knock up an example.
Here is the scenario,
1. Insert a marker at a position specifying a zIndex of 1.
2. Once this marker has been drawn - important step - insert another marker
slightly higher (ensuring overlap for validation). It is important that the
second
I have seen that there is the property cursor within MarkerOptions.
I need to display a magnifying glass over my marker image and thought that
this would be the way to go.
As the documentation only specifies « Mouse cursor to show on hover », I
tried setting it to a cursor image file = didn't
Since markers are now rendered via canvas, are requested zIndex values
respected ?
It is not my impression.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Maps JavaScript API v3 group.
To post to this group, send email to
Andri,
Your problem with animated gifs is due to the fact that the original
image is no longer used.
Instead it is drawn onto a canvas object - in your case the first
frame of the animated gif.
Should you still need to use an animated gif, you will need to create
your own overlay object which
Wow, I wasn't expecting so many exchanges.
From what I am seeing here, the only thing which is guaranteed with
versioning, are the interfaces.
The underlying code is not guaranteed - notably undocumented features
which a number of us have relied on.
On Mar 7, 12:12 am, Ben Appleton
I had developed my code relying on the undocumented, but referenced, object
pixelBounds for aligning my custom info overlay.
After having requested that this be documented and fixed, it was removed in
the version 3.4 release (despite the change request having been accepted).
So, in order to be
I have no problem with that Larry.
My problem is that the version 3.2 *has *been changed with code from the
version 3.4.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Maps JavaScript API v3 group.
To post to this group, send email to
Having taken the example page for Map Coordinates as a starting point -
http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/javascript/examples/map-coordinates.html
... I tried to do a the conversion shown here in reverse.
Obviously, I have some problems.
Here is my pseudo code -
1. Convert pixels to
Sorry,
Just realised that the values given in my opening post were simply
duplicated ... tried to go too quickly.
Input values LatLng - pixels
Latitude : 41.850033
Longitude : 87.6500522997
Zoom Level: 0
Pixel output :
X : 65
Y : 95
Now conversion back to Lat/Lng
Latitude :
Sorry,
Just realised that the values given in my opening post were simply
duplicated ... tried to go too quickly.
Input values LatLng - pixels
Latitude : 41.850033
Longitude : -87.6500522997
Zoom Level: 0
Pixel output :
X : 65
Y : 95
Now conversion back to Lat/Lng
Latitude :
As there are a number of well experienced experts on this forum, who will
only answer to questions here, I need to seek your learned advice.
I have developed my map web site (offline, awaiting full data before going
public) and have noticed that there are certain tasks performed on the
server
The implementation for issue 2860 is not acceptable.
The issue was to have the pixelBounds object documented and its
property names officially fixed.
The object - pixelBounds - represents the pixel dimensions of an
object.
It is seen as being needed notably for markers where it provides
dimension
Hi Rossko,
No, this is not what I am wanting to do.
If you capture the server response when doing a directions request,
for example, the returned json response holds entries like this :
start_location: {
lat: 47.7088700,
lng: -2.6385000
},
Now, having looked through
PM, sgiddings mr.s.giddi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Rossko,
No, this is not what I am wanting to do.
If you capture the server response when doing a directions request,
for example, the returned json response holds entries like this :
start_location: {
lat: 47.7088700,
lng: -2.6385000
I am needing to be able to generate a polygon on my server and then
pass it back to the client.
Ok, I can create the series of latitude / longitude pairs which
describe the polygon and then pass it back to the client in a JSON
response.
What I would really like to do, is to have this JSON
Fernandeshttp://www.google.com/profiles/paulofernandesjrhttp://twitter.com/paulofernandesj
+55 11 9797-5974
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 5:32 PM, sgiddings mr.s.giddi...@gmail.com wrote:
I am needing to be able to generate a polygon on my server and then
pass it back to the client.
Ok, I can create
There is an open Issue for this requesting that the via_waypoint array
be documented and stay in place officially.
http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/issues/detail?id=2746
Feel free to add a comment and 'start' it to attempt to get it taken
into account by our google friends.
On Feb 15,
Thank you Esa,
I had also seen these two sites, yet the first is for static maps and
uses kml files, while the second is also for static maps.
I had hoped for something which could correctly handle requests within
a dynamic site.
On Feb 13, 7:35 pm, Esa esa.ilm...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know
Thank you Esa,
I had also seen these two sites, yet the first is for static maps and
uses kml files, while the second is also for static maps.
I had hoped for something which could correctly handle requests within
a dynamic site.
On Feb 13, 7:35 pm, Esa esa.ilm...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know
On Feb 14, 10:33 am, Chris Broadfoot c...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 8:30 PM, sgiddings mr.s.giddi...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for this. However they are using client-side clustering, which
I need to avoid.
They are not. The clusters are determined on the server, sent back via
I have searched through this forum and have not found a satisfactory
answer.
Does there exist an article or tutorial explaining how to implement
server side clustering, including handling zoom level changes ?
I really am looking for clustering and not KML layer generation.
Simon
--
You
-maps-utility-library-v3.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/
On Feb 9, 10:49 am, sgiddings mr.s.giddi...@gmail.com wrote:
I have built a custom overlay which works.
I am now wanting to pass all my script through the Closure Compiler.
Having seen a discussion in the CC group with Chad Killingsworth, I
I have built a custom overlay which works.
I am now wanting to pass all my script through the Closure Compiler.
Having seen a discussion in the CC group with Chad Killingsworth, I
was wondering if there were any step by step instructions on how to
correctly prepare the overlay script (perhaps
...http://closure-compiler.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/contrib/externs/maps...
Thanks
-- Luke
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 6:47 AM, sgiddings mr.s.giddi...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone have the correct address for the externs file for use with
google's closure compiler ?
The addresses given
Does anyone have the correct address for the externs file for use with
google's closure compiler ?
The addresses given in the announcement by Chad and Luke are nolonger
valid (http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3/
browse_thread/thread/be037b22a148af0b/f4e587c6440847a9)
--
You
For Paulo -
It is obvious that you have not taken the time to correctly understand
my post.
I indicate two aspects - the site is still in DEV, therefore not
visible, so no demo !
Secondly, the information given was sufficiently detailed and clear
permitting Rossko to give a very pertinent reply.
?
Is there a correct means to be able to access the div DOM element to
query for this value within the attributes property ?
On Feb 1, 10:15 am, sgiddings mr.s.giddi...@gmail.com wrote:
For Paulo -
It is obvious that you have not taken the time to correctly understand
my post.
I indicate two aspects - the site
that you set, which is undefined in this case.
This behavior is consistent between browsers. Why do you mention IE in the
title of your post?
You will find this group much more helpful if you post a link to a site that
replicates the issue.
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:06 AM, sgiddings
:
Right; if you want to robustly control the placement of your markers you
should specify a zIndex for each.
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:04 PM, sgiddings mr.s.giddi...@gmail.com wrote:
I mention this because, in Firefox, I can access the z-index correctly
through getZIndex and thus place my flag
One last little note (gripe) - the documentation really needs to be
updated to reflect the rules exposed here !
On Feb 1, 1:27 pm, sgiddings mr.s.giddi...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Ben,
After some more tests, the behaviour in Firefox should be defined as
undefined.
I have tried assigning
Is the API officially supported within Opera ?
I have noticed that the mouse wheel zooming works inversly - that is -
scroll up normally for zooming in will zoom out in opera, etc.
Is there a behaviour particularities within specific browsers ?
--
You received this message because you are
accessible to users without charge)
On Jan 18, 5:23 am, sgiddings mr.s.giddi...@gmail.com wrote:
I have discovered a bug related to the dragging of a
DirectionsRenderer rendered route and have consequently opened a bug
report -http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/issues/detail?id=2995
Can anyone confirm if a DirectionsRequest with
provideRouteAlternatives set to true is limited to returning a maximum
of only 3 routes ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Maps JavaScript API v3 group.
To post to this group, send email to
I have discovered a bug related to the dragging of a
DirectionsRenderer rendered route and have consequently opened a bug
report -
http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/issues/detail?id=2995
I have provided the users of my (non-public) web site, the option of
asking for alternative routes
Hi Luke,
You state that the issue 2465 relates to accessing the size property
of a MarkerImage object, I think you referenced the wrong issue (at
least when clicking on the link, it does not display this).
Simon
On Nov 29, 8:11 am, Gary Little g...@luxcentral.com wrote:
I noticed a couple of
Hi Luke,
You state that the issue 2465 relates to accessing the size property
of a MarkerImage object, I think you referenced the wrong issue (at
least when clicking on the link, it does not display this).
Simon
On Nov 29, 8:11 am, Gary Little g...@luxcentral.com wrote:
I noticed a couple of
.
This is where my enhancement request comes in for officialising the
pixelBounds object -
- http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/issues/detail?id=2860
This request will provide the much needed dimensions at all times.
Can this be boosted up the to-do list ?
Simon
On Nov 29, 9:59 am, sgiddings
marker = new google.maps.Marker({map: map, position:
map.getCenter(), icon: markerImage});
google.maps.event.addListener(marker, 'click', function() {
alert(marker.getIcon().size);
});
Will that work for you?
Thanks,
Susannah
On Nov 29, 8:09 pm, sgiddings mr.s.giddi...@gmail.com wrote
For all of us that are building dynamic commercial sites with this
API, our added value and income generator is our database of
locations. When we have over 20 000 locations correctly geo-located
with commercial contracts behind the majority of them, protection of
our data is an issue.
Could
I indeed looked at the site diva-gis.
However, at least as France was concerned, the data was far from being
accurate enough.
On Nov 21, 7:16 pm, geocode...@gmail.com geocode...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Nov 21, 12:51 pm, Victor Angelier vangel...@diamond4it.nl wrote:
No thanks, that isn't helping
You are quite right, the pixelBounds object is the one you want.
However, even though it is mentioned in the documentation, it is not
documented and the objects property names are not fixed.
I have opened an issue to try to get this documented.
If you add a comment, the google maps team might
You are quite right, the pixelBounds object is the one you want.
However, even though it is mentioned in the documentation, it is not
documented and the objects property names are not fixed.
I have opened an issue to try to get this documented.
If you add a comment, the google maps team might
Thanks Rossko for your advice.
Here is the enhancement request - issue nº 2860
http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/issues/detail?id=2860
On Nov 10, 10:11 am, Rossko ros...@culzean.clara.co.uk wrote:
Have you had an answer from the team yet ?
Have you logged a formal enhancement
am, Luke Mahé lu...@google.com wrote:
I'll have a talk with the team about this.
-- Luke
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 7:17 PM, sgiddings mr.s.giddi...@gmail.com wrote:
Would it be possible to open up this object in the official API to fix
its property names ?
It would appear that quite a few
Hi Larry,
No, I am only working with driving directions.
Simon
On Nov 8, 2:03 pm, geocode...@gmail.com geocode...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Nov 8, 12:50 am, sgiddings mr.s.giddi...@gmail.com wrote:
I am implementing a custom rendering of Directions results
instructions.
However, I have seen
.
Simon
On Nov 8, 3:59 pm, geocode...@gmail.com geocode...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Nov 8, 6:56 am, sgiddings mr.s.giddi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Larry,
No, I am only working with driving directions.
If you try them, you may see an example of the warning messages...
-- Larry
Simon
With the advent of draggable routes in V3, I was trying to see where
or if the information concerning the dragged point was stored.
After looking at the resulting directions object held within the
DirectionsService object, where I saw a via_waypoint array holding
the required information.
My
Would it be possible to open up this object in the official API to fix
its property names ?
It would appear that quite a few people would find it useful.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google Maps JavaScript API v3 group.
To post to this group, send
I have been looking at this example and am confused over an
undocumented function.
On the first line of the object creation function there is this line :
google.maps.OverlayView.call(this);
Can anyone explain where this call(...) function comes from ?
What is it doing ?
Are we supposed to use it
Thanks for that clarification.
In fact my question came about because I was trying to display only a
given bounds.
However, I realised that the calculation carried out behind the scenes
was to find the nearest zoom level which would encompass the specified
LatLngBounds.
On Oct 4, 12:10 pm,
Are the zoom levels documented somewhere ?
My tests show that they are independent of the viewport (div) size.
Since I need to implement automatic zooming and de-zooming, this kind
of information is essential.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google
I am building a site in France and need to display the geocoding
possibilities for a given search.
Since yesterday, searches which should give multiple results are only
returning one.
For example:
- when geocoding maison blanche, I get only one result instead of at
least 5 (as shown in the public
, sgiddings mr.s.giddi...@gmail.com wrote:
I have followed the help pages on the public map site
(maps.google.com) where it tells me where to find the report a
problem link. However, the link is either consistently grayed out,
or does not exist in the location described.
Can anyone direct me
Thanks Ralph, this was exactly what I was looking for !
On Sep 23, 3:23 pm, Nathan Raley nlrale...@gmail.com wrote:
According to the example he posted above js and css coupled with some tricks
to handle the map's center among a few other caveats that are all included
in the example linked
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo