Hi,
Is it intentional that tests are not checked by checkstyle? Does it mean
that code in tests doesn't need to follow GWT style guide?
--
Grzegorz Kossakowski
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=179766).
### Need help? Want to discuss something?
Join us here: [scala...@googlegroups.com](
http://groups.google.com/group/scalagwt).
Happy playing!
*Scala+GWT team*
--
Grzegorz Kossakowski
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=179766).
### Need help? Want to discuss something?
Join us here: [scala...@googlegroups.com](
http://groups.google.com/group/scalagwt).
Happy playing!
*Scala+GWT team*
--
Grzegorz Kossakowski
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
something?
Join us here: [scala...@googlegroups.com](
http://groups.google.com/group/scalagwt).
Happy playing!
*Scala+GWT team*
--
Grzegorz Kossakowski
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
and APIs
receive enough of Scala's
[pimp-love](http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=179766).
### Need help? Want to discuss something?
Join us here: [scala...@googlegroups.com](
http://groups.google.com/group/scalagwt).
Happy playing!
--
Grzegorz Kossakowski
--
You received
and APIs
receive enough of Scala's
[pimp-love](http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=179766).
### Need help? Want to discuss something?
Join us here: [scala...@googlegroups.com](
http://groups.google.com/group/scalagwt).
Happy playing!
--
Grzegorz Kossakowski
--
http://groups.google.com
into this problem I was coming to similar
conclusions as Stephen did. They never materialized into clean patches,
though. This time it seems like we have a chance to fix it which would be
great.
--
Grzegorz Kossakowski
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
On Tuesday, August 2, 2011 5:18:51 PM UTC+2, Emilio Bravo wrote:
http://www.thoughtworks.com/articles/technology-radar-july-2011#Platforms
thoughtworks technology radar july 2011, talk negatively about gwt,
these are the 3 reasons:
First, in many ways, JavaScript is more powerful and
On Tuesday, August 2, 2011 5:18:51 PM UTC+2, Emilio Bravo wrote:
http://www.thoughtworks.com/articles/technology-radar-july-2011#Platforms
thoughtworks technology radar july 2011, talk negatively about gwt,
these are the 3 reasons:
First, in many ways, JavaScript is more powerful and
2011/5/29 Scott Blum sco...@google.com
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Grzegorz Kossakowski
grzegorz.kossakow...@gmail.com wrote:
I cannot comment on your proposals because I don't know gwt internals
enough. I decided to add a method to TypeOracle that allows me to ask if
given type comes
to fully support
Jribble. Once I gather enough of information I'll try to write some report
and let you comment on it as I expect many things to be misunderstood on my
side. This won't happen sonner than in two weeks, though.
--
Grzegorz Kossakowski
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web
or Jribble. If it's Jribble I don't try to do any
conversions.
This is ugly and fragile method but seems to be the only viable strategy for
now. If you guys can come up with systematic solution to this problem it
would be awesome.
--
Grzegorz Kossakowski
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google
on with my work-around. It would
be great if those binary names were converted to source names as soon
as possible so number of places in gwt code where we have to consider
both options is minimized.
--
Grzegorz Kossakowski
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
2011/5/26 Grzegorz Kossakowski grzegorz.kossakow...@gmail.com:
2011/5/26 Eric Ayers zun...@google.com:
Hi again,
Can you point out any of places where you saw this assumption? The
last time I was mucking around with binary type names I was told not
to assume that $ could not appear
A$B.java
class A$B extends java.lang.Object{
A$B();
}
Is gwtc handling those cases in pure java environment properly?
--
Grzegorz Kossakowski
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
?
--
Grzegorz Kossakowski
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
information as java code but jdt doesn't
know about it, obviously.
--
Grzegorz Kossakowski
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
in order to
avoid two different versions of the same .class files?
--
Grzegorz Kossakowski
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
that
there are quite a few places in the code that are asking for a
classloader.
--
Grzegorz Kossakowski
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
mentioning: I'm talking here about compiled
classes in classpath because they are used to populate TypeOracle.
Source code (used for constructing GWT AST nodes) is in one copy
corresponding to version B.
--
Grzegorz Kossakowski
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
and verify correctness JUnit style.
Thanks for pointer to JJSTestBase that will be useful for me, too.
--
Grzegorz Kossakowski
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
that.
That was exactly the behaviour I was expecting from GWT. It's not
something I'll be pushing any further but if that idea brought again
you've got another reason to implement it.
As for now I'll remember to always check my assumptions using automated tests.
--
Grzegorz Kossakowski
--
http
, TypeOracle seems to be highly mutable data structure. When it
gets updated and why?
Do you guys have anything (slides, blog posts, discussions, etc.) that
would help me to better understand those matters?
--
Grzegorz Kossakowski
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Hi Scott!
Thanks for speedy and seriously awesome response! :-)
Some questions inline.
2011/3/14 Scott Blum sco...@google.com:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Grzegorz Kossakowski
grzegorz.kossakow...@gmail.com wrote:
1. What's the difference between TypeMap and TypeOracle and why
Thanks for reply. This is in line with my schedule. I'll be watching your
progress with great interest.
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
It looks like you are working on something that might be interesting to me.
Is there any place I can find more information on this change?
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
Thanks Scott for this. It's enough for me to understand motivation and (at
least some) implications of this change.
This is something which is certainly within my interest. Actually, what you
described is exactly what I wanted to see for a long time. I parse jribble
nodes twice for exactly the
in this effort but I don't want to speak
for them.
We'll be publishing more details once some basic stuff is set up.
--
Best regards,
Grzegorz Kossakowski
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
28 matches
Mail list logo
