I'm running at 2 rate and actually can handle 3, have 8 Mbit
link. There no loss at all, thats why I'm surprised to see choke. And
from net_graph I see rate not getting even close to 20Kbit/s (12-14 max)
from server, so changing to 3 not really do anything. My server
connected to
Isn't it time that like Q clan valve stepped in and sorted out lotus clan.
Using tactics to fill there servers with fake connections is never going to
give the client end user a good gaming experience. Joining a server 25/32
and finding nobody is actually on the server is exactly what the
Its the same way with the XXL Pros servers as well. All empty.
D3vilfish wrote:
Isn't it time that like Q clan valve stepped in and sorted out lotus clan.
Using tactics to fill there servers with fake connections is never going to
give the client end user a good gaming experience. Joining a
what are these things? what are you talking about?
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 4:23 PM, D3vilfish priv...@caterhamhill.net wrote:
Isn't it time that like Q clan valve stepped in and sorted out lotus clan.
Using tactics to fill there servers with fake connections is never going to
give the client
Did valve actually kill off the Q Clan? I thought Qosis just got tired
of running game servers. Lotus Clan servers show their fake players as ?
in hlsw for me.
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 07:23:07AM +0100, D3vilfish wrote:
Isn't it time that like Q clan valve stepped in and sorted out lotus
Q clans official statement was that they quit while on top but it seems to
most that due to Q clan having server/steam issues that it fell inline with
valves test on delisting, lets also not forget the money they made by
deception and miss use of valve software would be enough for valve to slap a
I suggest you go post this topic on the steam forums, instead of leaving us
confused as to what this has to do with server operation.
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 5:15 PM, D3vilfish priv...@caterhamhill.net wrote:
Q clans official statement was that they quit while on top but it seems to
most that
I agree with Arg!
But if you want my opinion, it's just plain annoying and stupid. My favorite
server host (DiG) , for TF2, at least, makes it say theres at least 10 on.
no big deal once its ful but if its not itsa nnyoing.
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 4:02 AM, Arg! chillic...@gmail.com wrote:
I
Lotus is awesome. I'm awesome and you clearly suck :D.
There's a bunch of servers with fake players that aren't delisted. Remember
there's a public fake player plugin that hasn't been broken. Anyone is free
to use it:
https://forums.alliedmods.net/showthread.php?t=74304
Go around joining some of
Your disillusion of yourself obviously shows with your first statement.
As pointed out by members on that thread filling a server with fake clients
1. May get you delisted
2. Doesn't give a good experience for the end user.
Hence why you FAIL.
Then lets look at your next comment about top ranked
Oh... com on... Valve could just remove TF2 SDK ability to use fake players
inside plugins or just automatically temporary delist servers, who have
players with “BOT” tags. (cracked - STEAM_ID_PENDING, achievement servers –
BOT_TAGS). I bet that this would require less resources and could be
choke = number of updates that were delayed due to rate limit
if you see choke then rate setting is too low
Nikolay Shopik wrote:
I'm running at 2 rate and actually can handle 3, have 8 Mbit
link. There no loss at all, thats why I'm surprised to see choke. And
from net_graph I see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It's fairly obvious the servers are cracked when I connect to them and
do status, and see.. Steam_ID_Cracked, STEAM_666:x:x, or an
entire server full of STEAM_ID_PENDING. I'm not going to try to
trick whoever is doing this into exploiting my server,
There's legitimate reasons why servers may have bots - they could be running an
an airshot map, for example. In my community, practice maps like that are run
on match servers while there isn't any matches on, but I can see a clan with
only one server might run it public some of the time, and
Valve use bots in their developer commentary system, too.
But the IBotManager interface of the current OrangeBox SDK is broken since the
Scout update.
*still waiting for a fix* :P
-Original Message-
From: hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com
See the following.
http://whisper.ausgamers.com/wiki/index.php/Tickrate#Choke
--
Cc2iscooL
Head Admin/Owner
http://www.cc2iscool.com
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Adam Nowacki no...@xpam.de wrote:
choke = number of updates that were delayed due to rate limit
if you see choke then rate
What is the value of:
sv_maxrate
} -Original Message-
} From: hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com [mailto:hlds_linux-
} boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of Adam Nowacki
} Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 10:12 AM
} To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list
} Subject: Re:
Max bandwidth rate allowed on server, 0 == unlimited
Next time, just type the cvar into server console without the value to
see that information.
-ics
Guy Watkins kirjoitti:
What is the value of:
sv_maxrate
} -Original Message-
} From: hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com
I was asking the value, not the definition!
If it is too low you will get choke. But the server control this.
} -Original Message-
} From: hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com [mailto:hlds_linux-
} boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of ics
} Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 1:02
By entering the cvar, you would know that the default value is 0
(anything between 0-3), max is 3.
-ics
Guy Watkins kirjoitti:
I was asking the value, not the definition!
If it is too low you will get choke. But the server control this.
} -Original Message-
} From:
Hi All
We are running about 500 srcds and hlds servers behind a NATed firewall
which seems to be a problem for VAC, Content, Master or whatever servers
at valve. :-(
Most of the times the server startup just fine, but more and more often,
probably due to more and more gameservers, why either
Yes, but I am not having the problem!
I am responding to the issue, not starting a new thread.
I guess I need to ask differently.
Nikolay Shopik,
What is the value of sv_maxrate when you are having your problems?
Thanks.
} -Original Message-
} From:
The maximum value for rate in the Source engine is 1048576.
3 seems to be a good maximum to use for L4D, though.
-Richard Eid
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 1:14 PM, ics i...@ics-base.net wrote:
By entering the cvar, you would know that the
On 07.06.2009 21:47, Guy Watkins wrote:
What is the value of sv_maxrate when you are having your problems?
sv_maxrate is 3, but it appears maybe problem is CPU of server I've
seen sometimes drop to 20 fps, need to check twice this.
___
To
Hi Thomas,
I ran into a similar situation, but on a much much smaller scale (a few
running on the same host behind NAT). Basically the same thing, server
would seem to pause after adding the master servers, but not
initialise VAC. I'm pretty sure it's a mechanism on VALVe's end of
things not
There sure has been a lot of QQ about other servers on these lists
lately. Are you guys really that jealous? Is it really worth all of
the time and energy whining about de-listing these servers, de-listing
those servers, etc? Just run your servers, build your community, and
re-route that
You speak as though you haven't ever played a source game. I usually
play on servers that have lots of people already on, and sort the server
list by occupancy. When multiple clans begin to fake the number of
online players, it clutters the server window. There is no easy way to
remove
27 matches
Mail list logo
