Active IOCDS - 9672 RB6

2006-02-14 Thread Rugel José
Hi: I actually don't remember how to make Active a new IOCDS into HMC, can anyone give me some tips ?. Old IOCDS is A2. New IOCDS must be A3, but how I can take A3 as an Active IOCDS ?. Thanks in advance. J. Rugel Phone: +593 4 2 566010

Re: Active IOCDS - 9672 RB6

2006-02-14 Thread Itschak Mugzach
Power on reset (POR). -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 10:31 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Active IOCDS - 9672 RB6 Hi: I actually don't remember how to make

REPONSE TIME QUESTION IN RMF WLM REPORT

2006-02-14 Thread Yan Ying
Hi all, I have a question about RMF report.In workload activity we can find response for certain service class.But SYSSTC always contain a SYSTEM in response time colume in the report.What is the SYSTEM meaning.Can any one help me?Thanks a lot. best regards YY ps. REPORT BY: POLICY=DEFAULT

Re: manipulating catalogs

2006-02-14 Thread Jim McAlpine
Well, we do have the ptf for that apar applied but the EXPORT/IMPORT did not delete and redifine the catalog. But most importantly to me, the IMBED attribute was removed. Jim McAlpine On 2/13/06, Mark Thomen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Barry Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message

IRD Ficon Native/Director

2006-02-14 Thread Christian Blesa
Good morning, we're studying the implementation of IRD in our installation (running on z/OS 1.4) and we have read the following redbook: SG24-5952-00 about z/OS Intelligent Resource Director. This redbook was written in August 2001 and we have seen possible obsolete references like the supported

Re: DASD allocation guidelines

2006-02-14 Thread Ron MacRae
Guys, Thanks for the replies. Sorry I should have been clearer on the question. The problem I have is that SDB is not producing the block sizes I, or more importantly my management, expect. Now it could be my understanding that is wrong or it could be that SDB is not getting it right, or,

Re: REPONSE TIME QUESTION IN RMF WLM REPORT

2006-02-14 Thread John Ticic
-- snip -- Hi all, I have a question about RMF report.In workload activity we can find response for certain service class.But SYSSTC always contain a SYSTEM in response time colume in the report.What is the SYSTEM meaning.Can any one help me?Thanks a lot. best regards YY -- snip -- SYSTC

How to configure ELF (Express Logon) to work with ACF2 and TSO Logon?

2006-02-14 Thread Hunkeler Peter (KRDO 4)
Hi, The Express Logon Feature (ELF) has recently been activated here. Is there someone using ACF2 and PCOM macros to log into TSO using ELF? I'm having troubles coding the PCOM macro. Peter Hunkeler CREDIT SUISSE -- For

Re: Active IOCDS - 9672 RB6

2006-02-14 Thread Roger Lowe
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:30:41 -0500, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rugel_Jos=E9?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi: I actually don't remember how to make Active a new IOCDS into HMC, can anyone give me some tips ?. Old IOCDS is A2. New IOCDS must be A3, but how I can take A3 as an

Re: Active IOCDS - 9672 RB6

2006-02-14 Thread Roger Lowe
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 05:38:49 -0600, Roger Lowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 03:30:41 -0500, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rugel_Jos=E9?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi: I actually don't remember how to make Active a new IOCDS into HMC, can anyone give me some tips ?. Old IOCDS

Re: Lynn at garlic.com

2006-02-14 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/13/2006 at 07:09 PM, Terry Sambrooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: This is off topic, but I keep getting e-mails from a lynn at garlic.com, Probably not; neither the return path in the envelope nor any address in the header is a reliable indicator of who actually sent

Re: Multiple address spaces

2006-02-14 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/12/2006 at 10:39 PM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Given that hardware innovation generally outpaces software exploitation, it's easy to conjecture that the continuing distinction between CS and ES arises more from a software than a hardware constraint.

Re: Multiple address spaces

2006-02-14 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/13/2006 at 08:20 AM, Tom Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: No, just under 1 TB. You're right - I calculated 253*Gi instead of 253*4*Gi :-( -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We

Re: Multiple address spaces

2006-02-14 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/13/2006 at 10:39 AM, Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: A page frame will not be built until some storage on the page is allocated. It cannot be referenced until the frame is built. FSVO referenced. You can generate a page fault when there is no page frame for

Re: z/OS Console ID Tracking facility

2006-02-14 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/12/2006 at 09:36 PM, Ed Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I don't recall having any packaging issues with JES2. I do; in fact, they inspired me to send a song[1] for the sing along. The boss said that he understood why I would want to wait A week or two to run the

Re: z/OS Console ID Tracking facility

2006-02-14 Thread ibm-main
From: Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) : : Don't get me started on the CBPDO process and smp/e. : : Kids these days. I've been around for every release of SMP, and I was : around before there was an SMP. You don't know when you're well off. M - then there was the joy of using the Fujitsu attempt at

Re: offload

2006-02-14 Thread James Robinson
Jose: Certainly - just pre-allocate the dataset (be sure it is big enough), then point OFFLOAD1 to that DSN. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rugel José Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 2:10 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU

Re: DASD allocation guidelines

2006-02-14 Thread Ron and Jenny Hawkins
Ron, SDB should be getting it right unless something is overriding the blksize. Some samples of what you are getting would help. Very General Rules: - For any RECFM=VB/VBS you get 27998 - For anything else the blksize should be half track -

Looking for assembler book by Carmine Cannatello

2006-02-14 Thread Daniel Cremieux
Dear all , I am desesperately looking for Advanced assembler language and mvs interfaces by Carmine Cannatello , 1999 edition. This book is not sold any more and impossible to find on the web (amazon ..) - If you have the book and doesn't need it anymore , i would be grateful to be able to buy it

Re: 9672 R45 with zOS 1.4

2006-02-14 Thread John Eells
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thomas/Paolo, This is very strange. We've been told by IBM that inorder run anything higher than OS/390 2.10, we had to go to a z box. We're currently running OS/390 2.6 on a 9672 R83. snip That's not correct. z/OS R5 supports G5, G6, and MP3000 processors.

Re: Looking for assembler book by Carmine Cannatello

2006-02-14 Thread Burrell, C. Todd
I have both copies of this book (the older blue slim book and the newer brown and white thick book). If you are talking about the older version, then I would be glad to sell it to you. I don't need both copies, but I would like to keep the second edition. Email me directly at [EMAIL

PQ49668 ADD CSQYASCP TO PARMLIB MEMBER SCHEDXX ?

2006-02-14 Thread Knutson, Sam
Does anyone know if BCP ever satisfies this kind of request or should PQ49668 be updated to reflect that this is simply an installation task of MQSeries and always will be? APAR Identifier .. PQ49668 Last Changed 01/07/10 ADD CSQYASCP TO PARMLIB MEMBER SCHEDXX. Symptom ..

LPAR utilization more important than MVS utilization?

2006-02-14 Thread John Ticic
Greetings, I've noticed that RMF CPU reports favour showing LPAR utilization over MVS utilization. Let me give some examples. Also, I'm only considering LPAR mode on a z990. 1. SUMMARY(INT) summary report shows MVS % 2. REPORTS(CPU) is comprised of 3 parts (relevant here). a. shows MVS%

Re: Disk vs Tape scenario

2006-02-14 Thread Bruce Black
What kind of numbers do you see when *writing*? (File must be large enough to remove the effects of any write cache.) I just ran a quick test using our FDRERASE product (which overwrites every track on a volume). I set it up so that it had to actually transfer a track-length record on

ADMINISTRIVIA: Old lost postings

2006-02-14 Thread Darren Evans-Young
Don't ask me how, but it seems like some old email that was originally lost, has resurfaced. I'm not in that dept anymore to investigate. Just ignore them. They will be dated Dec 27,28, 2005. Sorry for the confusion. This one is out of my hands. Darren Evans-Young IBM-MAIN List Owner

V CN(*),ACT undocumented

2006-02-14 Thread R.S.
I can't find description for the following command: V CN(*),ACT Of course I know this command, but it seems the command is undocumented, at least MVS System Commands does not mention it. Did I miss something ??? -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland

Re: V CN(*),ACT undocumented

2006-02-14 Thread McKown, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.S. Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 8:42 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: V CN(*),ACT undocumented I can't find description for the following command: V CN(*),ACT Of course I

Re: z/OS Console ID Tracking facility

2006-02-14 Thread Ed Gould
On Feb 14, 2006, at 6:58 AM, ibm-main wrote: From: Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) : : Don't get me started on the CBPDO process and smp/e. : : Kids these days. I've been around for every release of SMP, and I was : around before there was an SMP. You don't know when you're well off. M - then

Re: LPAR utilization more important than MVS utilization?

2006-02-14 Thread Ron and Jenny Hawkins
John, That's because MVS % Busy in LPAR mode is wrong. MVS % Busy is the compliment of CPU Wait Time, as Wait Time is what is actually captured. MVS % Busy = 1-((interval-wait time)/interval) In LPAR mode, if a Logical Processor is not dispatched by PR/SM then it does not accumulate

Re: DASD allocation guidelines

2006-02-14 Thread John P Kalinich
I have found that DSORG PS and PO don't always get half track blocking with SDB. For example, SDB picks a BLKSIZE of 7000 for LRECL 7000. Regards, John Kalinich Computer Sciences Corp

Re: V CN(*),ACT undocumented

2006-02-14 Thread Dana Mitchell
I have another System Console question. The other day we had a test system locked up with a full spool. I went to the HMC to see what was filling it, and what to purge. When I did the $DJOBQ,SPOOL=(PERCENT=.5) command to display some of the spool hogs, it showed me the names of the jobs, but

Re: ZIP/390 with Virtual Tapes

2006-02-14 Thread David Speake
Why ZIP to ANY 3490 or 3590 tape? The tape unit itself compresses before writing. The VT seems to do it twice. Once to see if it has all the data that would fit on a normal 3490 cart. I guess it writes the compressed data to its internal dasd. It would seem strange to compress data just to make it

Re: DASD allocation guidelines

2006-02-14 Thread David Andrews
On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 10:03 -0600, John P Kalinich wrote: I have found that DSORG PS and PO don't always get half track blocking with SDB. For example, SDB picks a BLKSIZE of 7000 for LRECL 7000. Interesting. On my system (z/OS 1.3... yeah, I know) an extended sequential dataset at LRECL=6991

Re: LPAR utilization more important than MVS utilization?

2006-02-14 Thread John (IBM-MAIN)
--- snip --- In LPAR mode, if a Logical Processor is not dispatched by PR/SM then it does not accumulate wait time even though it is actually waiting. This means that MVS % Busy is greater than actual time that LP within the LPAR were dispatched by PR/SM and busy. LPAR busy is the right number,

SDSF profile.

2006-02-14 Thread Claude Richbourg
Hello all, I appear to be having a 'GRAY' session today and cannot remember a certain command within SDSF. What I want to do is type ' ' on the command line to show me the user SDSF profile, similar to the command, 'TSO PROFILE'. I seem to remember doing this in the past, but cannot remember

Re: offload

2006-02-14 Thread Rugel José
Thanks. Do you know dsn characteritics ?. I mean , lrecl, po, etc. TIA. Jose. -Mensaje original- De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nombre de James Robinson Enviado el: Martes, 14 de Febrero de 2006 8:03 Para: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Asunto: Re: offload

Re: Active IOCDS - 9672 RB6

2006-02-14 Thread Rugel José
Thanks: I have donde this one year ago, but i remember using Single Object Operation option ( from HMC console ), but from SOO i don't remember the next step to select A3 as an active IODF, do you ?. This command can be done at any time after doing Power On Reset ?. TIA.

z/XDC announcement: Release z1.7 is now available for beta test

2006-02-14 Thread David Cole
Hi All, Release z1.7 of z/XDC is now available for beta testing. Major new features include: - Support for running as an FRR. - Support for debugging SRB mode routines. - Numerous lesser changes. For more details, please check www.colesoft.com/pr060213.html. Thanks, Dave Cole

Re: manipulating catalogs

2006-02-14 Thread Mark Thomen
Jim McAlpine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Well, we do have the ptf for that apar applied but the EXPORT/IMPORT did not delete and redifine the catalog. But most importantly to me, the IMBED attribute was removed. Actually, it DOES delete the catalog, because

RES: V CN(*),ACT undocumented

2006-02-14 Thread Ituriel do Nascimento Neto
You may try $DJOBQ,SPOOL=(PERCENT=.5),L=A Atenciosamente / Regards / Saludos Ituriel do Nascimento Neto Banco Bradesco S/A 4254/DPCD Alphaville Suporte Técnico - Software Básico Mainframes Tel: 55 11 4197-2021 Fax: 55 11 4197-2814 AVISO LEGAL BR Esta mensagem é destinada exclusivamente

Re: SDSF profile.

2006-02-14 Thread Tuco Bonno
i think you want the who command == /s/ tuco bonno graduate, College of Conflict Management, University of Southeast Asia. I partied on the Ho Chi Minh trail -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive

Re: SDSF profile.

2006-02-14 Thread Bill Westland
You are looking for the 'WHO' command. Claude Richbourg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, I appear to be having a 'GRAY' session today and cannot remember a certain command within SDSF. What I want to do is type ' ' on the command line to show me the user SDSF profile, similar to the

Re: DASD allocation guidelines

2006-02-14 Thread John P Kalinich
Both SMS and non-SMS allocations yield the same result here for PS. Regards, John Kalinich David Andrews

Re: SDSF profile.

2006-02-14 Thread Mendelson, Eric
There are two commands WHO and SET DISPLAY ON Project Leader - MVS HIP 32 Old Slip New York N.Y. 10005 212-806-4054 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Claude Richbourg Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 12:03 PM To:

Re: SDSF profile.

2006-02-14 Thread Claude Richbourg
Thanks all, Gray matter gone and I now have what I was looking for. For some reason I thought it was the 'WHOAMI' command. Claude Sisson, Melanie A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/14/2006 12:41 pm Like WHO - type WHO on the command line in SDSF. Melanie -Original Message- From: IBM

Re: REPONSE TIME QUESTION IN RMF WLM REPORT

2006-02-14 Thread Gerhard Adam
I have a question about RMF report.In workload activity we can find response for certain service class.But SYSSTC always contain a SYSTEM in response time colume in the report.What is the SYSTEM meaning.Can any one help me?Thanks a lot. best regards YY VELOCITY MIGRATION: I/O MGMT 41.6%

Re: offload

2006-02-14 Thread Greg Shirey
Jose, We offload the spool to a data set every night (then dump it to tape). Our data set looks like this: Data Set Name . . . : SYS3.JES2.OFFLOAD Volume serial . . . : SMF100 Device type . . . . : 3390 Organization . . . : PS Record format . . . : U Record length . . . : 0

Re: JES2 Crashing (Was: z/OS Console ID Tracking facility)

2006-02-14 Thread Edward E. Jaffe
Skip Robinson wrote: We've been running with OA13512 since the PTF came out. Not one error like that on any system. BTW it's been SOP at SCE since before I arrived here in 1994 to install each new OS release together with the corresponding JES2. Never had to back out because of JES2. ;-)

Re: SDSF profile.

2006-02-14 Thread Richard Pinion
No, who's on first, what's on second, and I don't know is on third! [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/14/2006 1:15 PM Thanks all, Gray matter gone and I now have what I was looking for. For some reason I thought it was the 'WHOAMI' command. Claude Sisson, Melanie A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/14/2006 12:41

OT post RE: SDSF profile.

2006-02-14 Thread Fletcher, Kevin
LOL. The first Abbot and Costello post I have seen. Thanks, Fletch -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Pinion Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 2:02 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SDSF profile. No, who's

Console tape mount message when 3494 in manual mode

2006-02-14 Thread Rob Wunderlich
I've got a 3494 tape library in manual mode due to a hardware problem. In manual mode, tape mount request appear on the 3494 Library Server console and the operator pulls the tape from the library storage slot and inserts it into the drive. When in manual mode, no tape mount message appears on

Re: DASD allocation guidelines

2006-02-14 Thread Barry Schwarz
Certain pathalogical LRECLs for FB data sets can store an odd number of records if unblocked but one less if blocked close to half track. In the case of 7000, 7 unblocked records will fit on a track Blocking at 14000 will allow 3 blocks (6 records) and blocking at 21000 will allow 2 blocks

Mainframe Stress Testing

2006-02-14 Thread George Bly
Hi All We are looking for products to stress test our Zseries mainframe Web CICS applications. Any one who knows of a good product or has any experience with such products please email me. We had a sales pitch from LoadRunner but it was not mainframe oriented. So any

Re: OT post RE: SDSF profile.

2006-02-14 Thread Thomas H Puddicombe
That's our shortstop! This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content,

Re: State of the Mainframe - Part II: The Capacity Conundrum

2006-02-14 Thread Hal Merritt
Some suggest that your company should insist the contract include language to protect you in the event of a 'rebranding', repackaging, or simple name change. I hear it can and has been done. My $0.02 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

Re: DASD allocation guidelines

2006-02-14 Thread Jeffrey Deaver
but we didn't care while under RVA because only the data was put onto real disk, we assumed this wastage of 3390 space was deliberate because there was no real correlation between 3390 space and RVA disk space. We have STK devices. But I still worry about proper blocking of files and try to

Re: PQ49668 ADD CSQYASCP TO PARMLIB MEMBER SCHEDXX ?

2006-02-14 Thread Jim Mulder
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 02/14/2006 08:48:39 AM: Does anyone know if BCP ever satisfies this kind of request or should PQ49668 be updated to reflect that this is simply an installation task of MQSeries and always will be? Yes, the BCP satisfies this

Re: FW: Mainframe Jobs Going Away

2006-02-14 Thread George J Shedlock
Speaking of Korvettes, anyone know what the name is purported to stand for? George Shedlock Jr PDC - 212-855-8675 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the

Re: PQ49668 ADD CSQYASCP TO PARMLIB MEMBER SCHEDXX ?

2006-02-14 Thread Skip Robinson
Our z/OS 1.7 ServerPac has a SCHED00 in CPAC.PARMLIB. It contains only one entry--CSQYASCP. So I think the answer to your question is that the 'fix' was implemented in subsequent releases. . . JO.Skip Robinson Southern California Edison Company SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager 626-302-7535 Office

Re: FW: Mainframe Jobs Going Away

2006-02-14 Thread Richard Tsujimoto
Eight Jewish Korean Veterans? George J Shedlock [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU 02/14/2006 04:24 PM Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU To IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU cc Subject Re: FW: Mainframe Jobs Going Away

Re: Mainframe Stress Testing

2006-02-14 Thread George Bly
There was talk of mainframe connectors? There were tools that could measure mainframe stress(os, cics, disk, cpu) but no specifics. The mainframe is a one engine 192mip we handle 1,767,000 transactions during an 8 hour day. Plus batch, plus DB2, and plus TSO. We run 100% and we want to see

Re: FW: Mainframe Jobs Going Away

2006-02-14 Thread Richards.Bob
Give the man a Kewpie Doll! Bob -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Tsujimoto Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 4:27 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject:Re: FW: Mainframe Jobs Going Away Eight Jewish

Re: Mainframe Stress Testing

2006-02-14 Thread Kirk Talman
1) Anyone who has a session manager that supports scripting can use it to test any VTAM application. But I thought the tests were to be run on a Web interface. One would think for this a solution should sign on as a browser. 2) As an aside, when I was a developer for Duquesne Systems' (then

Re: Mainframe Stress Testing

2006-02-14 Thread John S. Giltner, Jr.
If you want to stress test a Web based application, Load Runner will work. We do use it. As far as stressing the application it does work. It does not care if the application is mainframe based, Linux, or Windows. It is HTTP traffic, right? The problem with any application stress testing

Re: FW: Mainframe Jobs Going Away

2006-02-14 Thread Paul Gilmartin
In a recent note, Richards.Bob said: Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:37:15 -0500 Give the man a Kewpie Doll! Snopes calls this urban legend: Linkname: Urban Legends Reference Pages: Business (E.J. Korvette) URL: http://www.snopes.com/business/names/korvette.asp E.J.

Re: FW: Mainframe Jobs Going Away

2006-02-14 Thread Richards.Bob
Gil, I won't doubt you for a moment. But as one who went into the store all the time in the '60s, this *urban legend* really did have legs. It was *their* sales people that told me what it stood for! Bob -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: FW: Mainframe Jobs Going Away

2006-02-14 Thread George J Shedlock
Now, the real question. How many that had the right answer, knew it without looking it up??? I also visited the store on a fairly regular basis (New Brunswick NJ store) and was told the same thing by an employee. George Shedlock Jr PDC - 212-855-8675 Richards.Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent

Re: Mainframe Stress Testing

2006-02-14 Thread John S. Giltner, Jr.
Do you want to stress test, or performance measure? They are two different things. We use Load Runner to stress, and RMF/SMF to measure. Of couse we are using WAS and not CICS, but we have WSAM to measure that side. That I am aware of Load Runner does not have any code that will run on

IBM Purchases JZOS

2006-02-14 Thread Kirk Wolf
IBM announcement today of purchasing JZOS and their intention to integrate it into the z/OS Java SDK: See: http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/software/java/java_press.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /

Re: FW: Mainframe Jobs Going Away

2006-02-14 Thread Alan Schwartz
Worked in two stores in Pennsylvania after college; one in Valley Forge and one in Northeast Philly Alan Schwartz Assurant Shared Business Services Lead Systems Programmer Phone: 651-361-4758 Fax: 651-361-5625

Re: State of the Mainframe - Part II: The Capacity Conundrum

2006-02-14 Thread Bruce Black
AFAIR some time ago Oracle did bad trick - they repackaged the software, so most of upgrade contracts were not applicable - customers had to buy full versions. I thought I read recently that Oracle was laying off 3000 employees, about 3% of their workforce. If I remembered that accurately,

Re: FW: Mainframe Jobs Going Away

2006-02-14 Thread Richards.Bob
Alan, By Valley Forge, you really mean King of Prussia! grin And that was before the mall *doubled* in size. Bob -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Schwartz Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 5:20 PM To:

SHARE Seattle Lab - Install z/OS Tomcat in an hour

2006-02-14 Thread Kirk Wolf
We are pleased to offer a new hands-on lab this year to follow the popular z/OS Java Batch Topics presention, which won best user session last year... ( and updated for 2006). Hope to see you there early, with this much fun we don't expect any empty seats :-) Session 8369 - Java Lab: z/OS

Re: DASD allocation guidelines

2006-02-14 Thread Ron and Jenny Hawkins
John, You are absolutely correct. The aim of SDB is to maximise the space used on a track, and not to simply do half track blocking. An LRECL of 7000 with RECFM=VB will get a blksize of 27998 from SDB, but for FB a BLKSIZE of 7000 will realise more data per track. If SDB did half track blocking

DB2 for z/OS V7 - Cluster with Expiration Date EQ 99365

2006-02-14 Thread Ben Alford
Posted to IBM-Main and DB2-L: We have discovered several dozen DB2 linear databases which have the cluster's Expiration date set to 99365 (and not the data Expiration date). They were not this way the previous month and we do not see any SMF for non-started tasks which might have altered the

Re: Mainframe Stress Testing

2006-02-14 Thread Rob Wunderlich
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:28:38 -0500, George Bly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There was talk of mainframe connectors? There were tools that could measure mainframe stress(os, cics, disk, cpu) but no specifics. The mainframe is a one engine 192mip we handle 1,767,000 transactions during an 8 hour day.

Re: Mainframe Jobs Going Away

2006-02-14 Thread David Speake
This stimulates. Why should they not be able to run UNIX/LINEX/AS400/Alpha-VMS or even Windows on Z chips without Z/OS or VM. I have no idea what the instruction set burned into the metal is like nor how I/O is really done at the hardware level. The ONLY metal instruction I know of is SIE and I

Don't fully understand IBM terminal

2006-02-14 Thread Matt Collins
I just started my job as a Tape Operator. The primary instructor won't be back for a few days so the lead operator is doing his best to fill in. I monitor these terminals where information is always scrolling up the screen. I think it's: time, job#, serial#, tape#, and some other stuff. But when a

Re: LPAR utilization more important than MVS utilization?

2006-02-14 Thread Ron and Jenny Hawkins
Don, Then should I see that MVS % Busy in LPAR mode is different to the accurate measure you get in Basic Mode or with Dedicated PIP :) Useful, but still wrong - like Device Busy with PAV. Ron -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

Re: IBM Purchases JZOS

2006-02-14 Thread Ray Mullins
Boy, between this, CIMS Lab, and others, IBM's on a buying tear. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kirk Wolf Sent: Tuesday February 14 2006 14:20 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: IBM Purchases JZOS IBM announcement

Re: LPAR utilization more important than MVS utilization?

2006-02-14 Thread Don Deese
Ron, Well, no. MVS Busy is not wrong but needs understanding that it is not the same as CPU Busy. Once its definition is understood, it is as valid as any other measure. Maybe a different term would be more acceptable (maybe we should come up with a description that does not convey busy

Re: LPAR utilization more important than MVS utilization?

2006-02-14 Thread Ron and Jenny Hawkins
MVS % Measured perhaps... :) It can't be any worse than the 1st attempt they had at FICON Channel Busy :( -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don Deese Sent: Wednesday, 15 February 2006 10:19 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU

3290 Manual

2006-02-14 Thread Chester Hood
We have several 3290 display stations in our production control area and had a requirement to power cycle some of them last Sunday morning. Unfortunately, their configuration had not been saved and there was some scrambling to get the configuration adjusted back to what the folks were used

Re: z/XDC announcement: Release z1.7 is now available for beta test

2006-02-14 Thread Todd Burch
WOO-HOO!!! Thanks Dave. My people should be contacting your people. ;) Todd Subject: z/XDC announcement: Release z1.7 is now available for beta test Hi All, Release z1.7 of z/XDC is now available for beta testing. Major new features include: - Support for running as an