You might be interested in apar OA28814 ...we faced it..
OA28814: $DISTERR XLOSTJQE AFTER NJE LINE ERROR
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?
rs=0q1=OA28814uid=isg1OA28814loc=en_UScs=utf-8cc=uslang=en
--
For IBM-MAIN
Timothy Sipples wrote:
Of course, I read those on-screen TCs very carefully and reviewed them
with a lawyer
I can't remember what software did this, but it requires you to SCROLL down
the whole thing up to the very last line, then the 'Ok' is highlighted.
Hope your lawyer did that for
I have done more then one migration from z/OS where the version differences
were more then 3-4.
Order a starter system and do the installation seperate from the other
volumes (no disk sharing)
Pay special attention to security (racf), Open Edition and SMS. When
migrating to the new release make a
Date: 10th June 2010
Location: NOVOTEL LONDON CITY SOUTH
53-61 SOUTWARK BRIDGE ROAD
LONDON
SE1 9HH
http://www.novotel.com/gb/hotel-3269-novotel-london-city-south/index.shtml
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za wrote:
Timothy Sipples wrote:
Of course, I read those on-screen TCs very carefully and reviewed them
with a lawyer
I can't remember what software did this, but it requires you to SCROLL down
the whole
On Tue, 11 May 2010 13:31:25 +0100, Sam Siegel wrote:
Using current z/OS technology, just imaging the questions that would
stream across this forum if there were 10,000,000 system programers
and z/OS installations. And everyone had unrestricted access to
IBMUSER.
In Mac OS X, only users
If this is to be done at all, it won't be done entirely in REXX. Some HLASM
subroutines will be required to do the real work, for the reasons that Chris
Craddock has already made clear.
I too can think of ways to do this in assembly language without using an SRB; I
once indeed implemented
On 5/10/2010 5:57 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
//SYSUT2 DD DISP=(,CATLG),DSN='FOO.BAR'
Clearly, but why prohibit cataloguing 'FOO.BAR'?
The DISP requests cataloging, but the quotes specify not to
catalog (by convention). As the request is self-contradictory,
the system takes the path
what rel are you running...was it another apar/ptf that broke this?
From:
Ravi Kumar gaur.ravi2...@gmail.com
To:
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date:
05/11/2010 03:32 AM
Subject:
APAR OA28814
Sent by:
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
You might be interested in apar OA28814 ...we
Good day to all
Could any of you be very kind to point me to documentation or web pages on
how to read, analyze and solve a U4093-92 abend?
Yes, it is a 31-bit COBOL program. I suspect the culprit is Language
Environment, but I need positive clues. I have the sources and is waiting for
my
Ref:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/ceea91a0/8.21
quote
X'5C' (92)
Anchor setup malfunctioned.
/quote
What __that__ means
LE bookshelf at
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/Shelves/CEE2BKA0
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
McKown, John wrote:
X'5C' (92)
Anchor setup malfunctioned.
Thanks. I suspect that the COBOL program is making an incorrect call with
perhaps incorrect parameters.
I suggested to the user to do an inventory of all CALLED programs and to re-
compile all of them, the called programs first
My understanding is if the target address space is non-swappable then
you can safely use non-srb code to obtain access to the other address
space's private area. I believe the unpredictability comes when the
target address spaces are swappable. Depending upon your application
requirements
A friend just sent this to me. It looks like IBM is going to make it harder to
stay on no longer supported releases. Does anyone know if this is the new
direction for IBM??
In the past if you had a IBM software product that goes past the supported date
you could order maintenance and
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Ray Overby rayove...@comcast.net wrote:
My understanding is if the target address space is non-swappable then you
can safely use non-srb code to obtain access to the other address space's
private area. I believe the unpredictability comes when the target
I have a user who reported a problem when ISPF went to create a temp data
set during the batch job submission. It appears that ISPF or the system
tried to allocate the file on a volume the user
did not have authority to use.
We use TOP SECRET (TSS) from CA as our security package.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Gerhard Postpischil
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 7:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Member name format for z/OS directory as simulated PDS?
Snipped
Might as well ask why data
Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
Good day to all
Could any of you be very kind to point me to documentation or web pages on
how to read, analyze and solve a U4093-92 abend?
Yes, it is a 31-bit COBOL program. I suspect the culprit is Language
Environment, but I need positive clues. I have the
Ray,
I think the OP and Chris were referring to a situation where the target address
space is being snooped - rather than sharing its memory by a controlled and
approved x-memory linkage. There are example code snippets out there in the
public domain that attempt to access private storage in a
What is the proper procedure for moving a VTOC Copy Data Set Entry
for a Volume from an ML1? Freevol and migrate do not appear to work.
We are migrating from a Shark to a DS8700 and I need to migrate all
the ML1 datasets to the new units.
I've seen the question asked in a previous post but
And even if you do use an SRB, there is still no guarantee that the
results won't be unpredictable. While the SRB approach protects you
from some problems, it still doesn't provide access to any serialization
techniques in use by the target address space.
I don't think so. From today's announcement at:
http://www.ibm.com/vrm/newsletter_10577_6742_158312_email_DYN_1IN/sacwv64209573
2nd paragraph of OVERVIEW
The IBM Lifecycle Extension for z/OS V1.9 (5646-A01) provides fee-based
corrective service (a fix, bypass, or restriction to a problem)
On Tue, 11 May 2010 10:13:34 -0500 Chris Craddock crashlu...@gmail.com
wrote:
:On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Ray Overby rayove...@comcast.net wrote:
:
: My understanding is if the target address space is non-swappable then you
: can safely use non-srb code to obtain access to the other address
On Tue, 11 May 2010 11:14:56 -0400 Duane Weaver weaver...@osu.edu wrote:
:I have a user who reported a problem when ISPF went to create a temp data
:set during the batch job submission. It appears that ISPF or the system
:tried to allocate the file on a volume the user
:
:did not have
If you read the announcement closely
Extended 'new defect' support (for a fee)
If you acquire the IBM Lifecycle Extension for z/OS V1.9, problem
reporting remains unchanged for the duration of the Lifecycle Extension
period. During this time, the IBM Support Center can be contacted to
report
Rob Scott wrote
I think the OP and Chris were referring to a situation where the target
address space is being snooped - rather than sharing its memory by a
controlled and approved x-memory linkage. There are example code snippets out
there in the public domain that attempt to access private
I am changing a PROC so that DEFAULT SYMBOLIC PRDHLQ=X.YYY.
All,
I am changing a PROC so that DEFAULT SYMBOLIC PRDHLQ=X.YYY.ZZ is no longer
necessary. Unfortunately, many JCL members referencde the PROC and supply
override values for PRDHLQ=. I want to change the PROC without having
Just got this in my Email this morning. This is much more like it. At
60-75/hr for W-2, that's about 90-110/hr. independent. Definitely a step in
the right direction.
zOS Support
Oklahoma City, OK
1 year
Pay rate: $60/hr. - $75/hr. w2
US citizen, GreenCard, EAD Only
w2 only, no
What about a // SET JUNK=HLQPARM ???
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Mike Kovach
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 10:44
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Killing Off Symbolic JCL Parameter
I am changing a PROC so that DEFAULT
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Mike Kovach
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 10:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Killing Off Symbolic JCL Parameter
I am changing a PROC so that DEFAULT SYMBOLIC PRDHLQ=X.YYY.=
Thanks for the answer. I must have been having a
I love this forum.
Thanks for the answer. I must have been having a brain block.
Mike Kovach
From: Field, Alan C. alan.c.fi...@supervalu.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Tue, May 11, 2010 11:56:55 AM
On Tue, 11 May 2010 11:14:56 -0400, Duane Weaver wrote:
I have a user who reported a problem when ISPF went to create a temp data
set during the batch job submission. It appears that ISPF or the system
tried to allocate the file on a volume the user did not have authority to use.
Any
Or.. rty //ANYDD DD DUMMY,DSN=HLQPARM..A
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Mike Kovach mrmach...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks for the answer. I must have been having a
I love this forum.
Thanks for the answer. I must have been having a brain block.
Mike Kovach
If I understand the flood of information that came my way when I was trying to
understand this exact same thing, the LDA is an example of a control block you
can access without using an SRB.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
You may want to take some of this over to the TSO-REXX group. We're getting a
little bored over there. The current topic is why is there no current topic.
I have some code that Rexx calls as a function that snoops the LDA from another
address space. Not sure if it is good or not. It uses
I don't have an answer to the problem but I do have a bypass for the user.
Have him save his changes in ISPF and then use the SUBMIT command from ISPF
6:
SUBMIT 'dsn(member)'
That doesn't use temporary datasets so he should be able to get the job to
run.
Thank You,
Paul Strauss
http://www.mainframezone.com/it-management/windows-and-other-x86-operating-systems-on-system-z
Windows on System z
by Philip Smith III
May 11, 2010
For more than four decades, various incarnations of IBM’s popular Virtual
Machine mainframe hypervisor—VM/370, VM/SP, VM/XA, VM/ESA, and now
I don't believe that z/OS is involved in any way. It appears to be a guest
under z/VM only
Jerry Whitteridge
Safeway Inc.
925 951 4184
If you feel in control
you just aren't going fast enough.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Or from right in his edit session
SAVE;TSO SUBMIT dsn(member)
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Paul Strauss
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 10:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ISPF temp allocation during job
Makes sense (architecturally) under VM -- VM, after all, hosts other operating
systems. Like CMS, Windows is (basically) a single-user operating system. On a
big machine a one-user OS only makes sense if you can run a lot of them (as
with CMS).
I can see a value to the product, the same value
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Charles Mills
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 12:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Windows on Z/os and Z/vm shortly?
Makes sense (architecturally) under VM -- VM, after all,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 12:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Windows on Z/os and Z/vm shortly?
SNIPPAGE
From reading, z/VOS ipls itself. It is a advanced
Duane Weaver wrote:
I have a user who reported a problem when ISPF went to create a temp data
set during the batch job submission. It appears that ISPF or the system
tried to allocate the file on a volume the user
did not have authority to use.
We use TOP SECRET (TSS) from CA as our
Is it possible this users uid.* datasets are not SMS managed?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Tom Sipusic
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 2:14 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] ISPF temp allocation during job
Start by finding every error message there is. This could be simple. For
example oftentimes we forget to create an alias for a new TSO/ISPF user and
they quickly get an access violation trying to update the master catalog.
Others have posted some good alternatives but ultimately it would be
One thing I have noticed is that if you allow logons to multiple systems
at the same time and do not modify the ISPF allocation names to be LPAR
specific you will get contention for the temporary submit dataset such
that the first system you did a submit from will be the only system you
can submit
Me thinks the title should have been
Windows on System Z and z/VM shortly?
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Thompson, Steve
steve_thomp...@stercomm.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent:
As the author of the article, I'll note that:
- It is indeed z/VM only. z/OS was never mentioned.
- Perhaps the old z/VOS name confused folks, was read as z/OS. Not
the same.
- The name is now z86VM anyway.
John McKown wrote:
Why not just have an actual Xeon on
Of course, Jerry's response makes much more sense now. I just didn't pay
attention to the original subject.
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Mark Pace mpac...@gmail.com wrote:
Me thinks the title should have been
Windows on System Z and z/VM shortly?
--
Rich Smrcina
Velocity Software, Inc.
You would need a hundred of 'em.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of McKown, John
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 10:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Windows on Z/os and Z/vm shortly?
From reading, z/VOS ipls
On 5/11/2010 at 08:21 AM, Mark Wilson ma...@rsmpartners.com wrote:
Date: 10th June 2010
Cool. A mainframe Linux user group that I didn't know about before. I'd like
to collect a list of them on wiki.linuxvm.org. If there's anyone out there
that knows about other mainframe user
On Tue, 11 May 2010 08:53:56 -0700 George Fogg gf...@nwlink.com wrote:
: Rob Scott wrote
: I think the OP and Chris were referring to a situation where the target
: address space is being snooped - rather than sharing its memory by a
: controlled and approved x-memory linkage. There are example
That is, the z/OS TCP/IP stack from CA? If so, do you use anything that relies
on IBM System SSL with it? I'm trying to verify that this works -- I can't
believe it doesn't (if it didn't, things like WebSphere would be shut out of
using TCPAccess, which I would think would have killed the
53 matches
Mail list logo
