--- On Mon, 6/21/10, Mark Yuhas mark.yu...@paccar.com wrote:
---SNIP--
Since CA is now going to distribute updates and releases via MSM, does
this mean that all of CA's products will follow the same methodology for
installation? For example, Telon would
Rick Fochtman pisze:
[...]
Disabling your own software after a certain date is one thing;
unpleasant but not unheard of. Disabling the whole shop is HIGHLY
UNETHICAL and should be condemned with all possible vigor.
Unethical - sure. Unlawful? Not necessarily. And can be hard to prove.
BTW: A
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:50:42 +0800 ibmnew ibm...@163.com wrote:
: Our shop is z/OS 1.9.
: On the one z/OS 1.9,there isn't RC of step in the joblog.Please see it below:
Done by exit IEFACTRT.
--
Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen
Dear
The exit IEFACTRT( SYSSLS0.IEFACTRT E) is enable. Do we need recompile the
exit?
Thanks a lot!
Best Regards,
Jason Cai
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:50:42 +0800 ibmnew ibm...@163.com wrote:
: Our shop is z/OS 1.9.
: On the one z/OS 1.9,there isn't RC of step in the joblog.Please see it
Kenneth
I would also be interested in any other z/OS Java discussion groups.
The one group I can refer you to is the z...@yahoogroups.com here:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/z390/
This group has over 400 IBM mainframe system programmers on it following
evolution of z390 Portable Mainframe
That message is usually generated by the IEFACTRT exit. The default one
installed by IBM is a do nothing. So somebody must have installed the
example IEFACTRT exit on one system, but not the other.
In ISPF, go to option 6 and enter DDLIST. Then enter LINKLIST. Then
enter FIND IEFACTRT LPALIST.
Hi,
We have the following request from our user.
A job step creates 14 different reports (SYSOUTS). The user would like the
whole set of reports to be printed 5 times.
For example if the reports are named d01-d14 the order should be:
d01, d02, d03, d04, d05….d01, d02, d03, d04, d05…..
All of
This is done by IEFACTRT smf exit. Check if you are using the right one
2010/6/28 ibmnew ibm...@163.com
Dear all
Our shop is z/OS 1.9.
On the one z/OS 1.9,there isn't RC of step in the joblog.Please see it
below:
09.11.48 JOB03386 THURSDAY, 10 JUN 2010
09.11.48 JOB03386
Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
Rick Fochtman pisze:
Disabling your own software after a certain date is one thing; unpleasant
but not unheard of. Disabling the whole shop is HIGHLY UNETHICAL and should
be condemned with all possible vigor.
Unethical - sure. Unlawful? Not necessarily. And can be
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
joa...@swbell.net (John McKown) writes:
I think that there is a difference between having a normal (ain't no
such beastie) application programmer and an old
In a message dated 6/28/2010 4:40:30 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
bdis...@dissensoftware.com writes:
D PROG,EXIT,EX=SYS.IEFACTRT,DIAG
D PROG,LPA,MODNAME=IEFACTRT
Depending on System/Service PAK there used to be a Null IEFACTRT in LPALIB
so if the usermod goes to LINKLIB might be
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 15:00:14 -0400, Thompson, Steve
steve_thomp...@stercomm.com wrote:
I just have to ask this one question.
How difficult is it to get the number of directory blocks from a PDS in
a _ program (where the blank can be filled in with COBOL, PL/1,
REXX, etc., but not HLASM/ASM)
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 23:14:44 -0700, Ed Gould ps2...@yahoo.com wrote:
snip
Well I was wrong *BUT* not totally. It seems as though that the glorious
folks at CA didn't want to really play the SMP/e rules.
It came out after the following 5 (or so years) that indeed CA didn't want
to put in all the
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 07:43:26 -0500 Mark Zelden mzel...@flash.net wrote:
:Even easier than you wrote...
:/* rexx - zero a PDS Directory */
:ARG dsn
:ALLOC F(PDSDIR) DA(dsn) SHR REUSE
Clark Morris wrote:
On 27 Jun 2010 07:30:35 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Until IBM provides a language or variant such as a systems flavor of
C/C++ that has access to all of the facilities (including the peculiar
linking conventions for some JES exits, any management that does not
MF vendors have played this game for years. License codes are issued annually,
when the product maintenance is paid, and have to be updated in a parmlib or
lmod. It is a well defined and accepted practice, so long as it is stated
upfront.
-Original Message-
Subject: Re: O/Topic
Timothy,
- John's question was about Java app servers and AFAIF was not restricted to
JEE app servers.
- What I said was that WAS isn't light weight, either in terms of resource
usage or administration. Of course, no JEE app server is really light
weight - its a (IMO) bloated architecture.
Compare your SMFPRMxx PARMLIB members.
Check if IEFACTRT is specified in SUBSYS(JES2... in SMFPRMxx.
Kevin.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of ibmnew
Sent: 28 June 2010 09:51
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: There isn't RC
Rick,
You can get to z/Arch Pops by starting at
http://www-05.ibm.com/e-business/linkweb/publications/servlet/pbi.wss
Enter country, then Search for publications, enter pub SA22-7832 , click Go,
and you're there. Works every time, that is until IBM changes the link again.
Al
In a message dated 6/28/2010 8:37:34 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
dennis.ro...@lmco.com writes:
in a parmlib or lmod. It is a well defined and accepted practice, so long
as it is stated upfront.
Back when it was MIX, they'd fall on some relative of Machiavelli's
birthday! Sinister
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Sharon Lopez
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 10:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: CA's Hyperbuf
Does anyone have any comments on CA's Hyperbuf product? We are
replacing
BMC's Batch
In a message dated 6/28/2010 9:50:09 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
paulgboul...@aim.com writes:
Perhaps this is statistically unremarkable. How many relatives
does Machiavelli have? Is the number increasing exponentially?
Google's pretty good at these types rhetorical discourses.
“No
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:20:48 -0500, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net wrote:
Where, in the CD-COM collection, has he hidden the Principles of
Operations manual? I don't have WEB access from work and I need that
manual!
Which CD-ROM collection, Rick?
--
Walt Farrell
I supported an app that was under ca-hyperbuf control. Tweaked
constraints, etc. I can't provide test results but from what I recall
it did a fairly decent job of providing automatic buffering for the
remaining VSAM files we had. I allowed buffering for PS files, which
occurred, but cannot
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Sharon Lopez
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 10:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: CA's Hyperbuf
Does anyone have any comments on CA's Hyperbuf product? We
are replacing
BMC's
Kenneth,
Here are some resources you may want to look at, but most don't have too
much activity:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/forums/forum.jspa?forumID=195
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/forums/forum.jspa?forumID=801start=0
Where can I find the pros and cons of controlling the content of the MC?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2010 10:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Linklst; 6
The book is called dz9zr006.pdf on my IBM-Books CDROM which was delivererd with
z/OS 1.10
--
Alexander Riedel
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Walt Farrell
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 5:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Does anyone have any comments on CA's Hyperbuf product? We are replacing
BMC's Batch optimizer and we are having alot of problems with Hyperbuf.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
So I date back to MFT and the honorable S360. However after attending the
demonstration for MSM my views are somewhat changed. Guess the old dog will
be learning some new tricks.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:04:12 EDT, Ed Finnell wrote:
Back when it was MIX, they'd fall on some relative of Machiavelli's
birthday! Sinister
Perhaps this is statistically unremarkable. How many relatives
does Machiavelli have? Is the number increasing exponentially?
-- gil
Feel free to do an advert. Your stuff is good.
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 09:32:17 -0400 Thomas David Rivers riv...@dignus.com
wrote:
:Clark Morris wrote:
: On 27 Jun 2010 07:30:35 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
:
: Until IBM provides a language or variant such as a systems flavor of
:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:40:35 -0400, Don Williams donb...@gmail.com wrote:
Where can I find the pros and cons of controlling the content of the MC?
I don't think you'll find what you are looking for (a pros/cons list). It's
mostly common sense.
There is paragraph in DFSMS Managing Catalogs
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Alan Schenck
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 9:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: PoPS Manual
Rick,
You can get to z/Arch Pops by starting at
Riedel, Alexander wrote:
The book is called dz9zr006.pdf on my IBM-Books CDROM which was
delivererd with z/OS 1.10
Same PDF book, SA22-7832-06, in 'SK3T-4269-21' CDROM set.
HTH!
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
--
For
To avoid confusion with any SMF exit (and some other user written modules),
I always use the SYSLIB facility. I always know which version of any
controversial module is being used by simply looking in, for example,
SYS1.LPALIB.SYSLIB specified in PROGxx as
SYSLIB LPALIB(SYS1.LPALIB.SYSLIB).
On
On 25 Jun 2010 15:26:46 -0700, rfocht...@ync.net (Rick Fochtman)
wrote:
Even BAL programmers can produce lousy code; it's just sometimes harder
to spot. :-)
Character string manipulations, like scanning control statements, can be
inordinately complex in BAL if you're not really careful in the
On 25 Jun 2010 13:33:38 -0700, eamacn...@yahoo.ca (Ted MacNEIL) wrote:
What is the definition of user here?
Programmers, etc.
I went into more detail of what I meant into a previous response to Mark Z.
Then that statistic is a show me stat.
Does anyone know of a list-serve, group, blog, etc for Candle (IBM) product
AF/Operator?
TIA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN
--- On Mon, 6/28/10, Mark Zelden mzel...@flash.net wrote:
From: Mark Zelden mzel...@flash.net
Subject: Re: Linklst; 6 of 1/half dozen of the other?
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Monday, June 28, 2010, 11:19 AM
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:40:35 -0400, Don Williams donb...@gmail.com wrote:
Where can
This post is trivial enough to require posting on a Friday, but it points out
the meaninglessness of anything that is not defined precisely enough.
We don't need to use Google to figure this out. If we had perfect
documentation, I think everyone on earth today could be shown to be a relative
In a message dated 6/28/2010 1:28:16 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
bi...@mainstar.com writes:
I think the poster meant MICS, and not MIX. I don't remember any MIX
product.
MIX was real. Precursor to MIM, Allen Systems. Enabled us to do stuff
with multiprocessors that GRS couldn't
MIX was real. Precursor to MIM,
Allen Systems. Enabled us to do stuff with multiprocessors that GRS couldn't
handle.
I thought it was MSX/MSI.
I don't remember MIX, but I have been wrong before.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
Ed Finnell of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
wrote on 06/28/2010 01:59:23 PM:
In a message dated 6/28/2010 1:28:16 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
bi...@mainstar.com writes:
I think the poster meant MICS, and not MIX. I don't remember any MIX
product.
MIX was
Bill Fairchild has used some very large numbers to make his entirely persuasive
case for duplications. In fact very much smaller numbers. This problem---It
is in fact called the birthday problem---has been much studied, particularly
and all but definitively by William Feller in volume 1 of
Hi:
We are at z/OS 1.9
Recently, Tape Data protection was changed (from volume level based on
TAPEVOL class to DSN level).
Relevant settings of the OLD schema:
- RACF TAPEVOL class ACTIVE
- TAPEDSN INACTIVE in SETROPTS
- TAPESECURITY(RACF) specified in DFHSM Parmlib.
-
-snip---
There was a time, not very long ago, when ad-hoc use of INTRDR was
deprecated (controlled?) because they were a finite resource. I suspect
one could still create pretty much havoc by OPENing INTRDRs up to a
system
In a message dated 6/28/2010 2:02:36 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
eamacn...@yahoo.ca writes:
don't remember MIX, but I have been wrong before
No, you're correct. The gutter folks have me a little flummoxed.
--
For
In a message dated 6/28/2010 2:05:37 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
jkali...@csc.com writes:
We used to run Super-MSI (Multiple Systems Integrity) from Allen Systems
Group, circa 1980.
Yep. MSI MSX. There was a competitor from maybe Duquense but it always
lost the benchmarks.
---snip
PS: no unethical persons were harmed while writing this post... ;-D
--unsnip---
Why not?? :-)
Rick
Yep. MSI MSX. There was a competitor from maybe Duquense but it always
lost the benchmarks.
SDSI, which I have also worked with.
But, I thought, and I could be wrong, that Duquense, became a company after
Moreno merged with the provider of SDSI.
1985?
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
In a message dated 6/28/2010 2:38:26 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
eamacn...@yahoo.ca writes:
But, I thought, and I could be wrong, that Duquense, became a company
after Moreno merged with the provider of SDSI.
Definitely foggy about the whole thing. We had MSX and MICS and were doing
-snip--
Even easier than you wrote...
/* rexx - zero a PDS Directory */
ARG dsn
ALLOC F(PDSDIR) DA(dsn) SHR REUSE RECFM(F), /* pds directory */
DSORG(PS) LRECL(256) BLKSIZE(256)
EXECIO 1 DISKRU PDSDIR (STEM
Either the 1.10 or 1.11 collection for z/OS
Rick
-
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:20:48 -0500, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net wrote:
Where, in the CD-COM collection, has he hidden the Principles of
Operations manual? I don't have WEB access
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 06/28/2010
03:38:32 PM:
From: Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: 06/28/2010 03:38 PM
Subject: Re: O/Topic Selling poisoned software
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Yep. MSI
For those people that are bored all day and PUMP 500 messages per week
into IBM-MAIN :
Original Message
Subject: SHARE Your Feedback: Your Organization’s Top Enterprise IT
Issues in 2010
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:43:06 -0500
From: SHARE Headquarters shar...@share.org
---snip
I don't think you'll find what you are looking for (a pros/cons list).
It's mostly common sense.
There is paragraph in DFSMS Managing Catalogs in the planning a
configuration chapter that states this:
For ease
snip-
The book is called dz9zr006.pdf on my IBM-Books CDROM which was
delivererd with z/OS 1.10
Same PDF book, SA22-7832-06, in 'SK3T-4269-21' CDROM set.
HTH!
It's on disk two of the DVD set I have. Look for the disk(s) labeled for
the PDF format books.
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:54:55 -0500, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net wrote:
snip-
The book is called dz9zr006.pdf on my
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/XKS/DZ9ZBK08
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-961-6183 cell
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com *
Rick,
I found them on my z/OS V1R11 2DVD set under z/Architecture and ESA/390
Principles of Operation PDFs on the 2nd disc. I used the Autorun Preferences
dialog that comes up when you insert the disk and pushed the Disk Index button.
That brings up a web page and I did a 'find' on
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 07:43:26 -0500, Mark Zelden mzel...@flash.net wrote:
/* rexx - zero a PDS Directory */
snip
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:00:39 +0300, Binyamin Dissen
bdis...@dissensoftware.com wrote:
That does not change the key.
I wonder what would happen if member GHJK was added and the
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 14:54:55 -0500, Rick Fochtman wrote:
I'm sure it's there, but WHERE?? Never mind that I prefer the .boo form,
so I can print it to a file and extract bits and pieces using SPF/PC.
Check the archives, Rick. This has been discussed several times before.
The last edition of
Which is here:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/Shelves/DZ9ZBK03
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-961-6183 cell
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com
Dear all
I checked our system.Please see informations below
On the bad system
D PROG,EXIT,EX=SYS.IEFACTRT,DIAG
RESPONSE=BT06
CSV464I 08.54.50 PROG,EXIT DISPLAY 176
EXIT SYS.IEFACTRT
Does anyone have formal IBM documentation stating that the 3375, 3380
and 3390 are FBA under the cover. I'm looking for something more
explicit than the intrusion of the cell size into capacity
calculations. Thanks.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
On 06/28/2010 02:07 PM, Juan Mautalen wrote:
Hi:
We are at z/OS 1.9
Recently, Tape Data protection was changed (from volume level based on
TAPEVOL class to DSN level).
Relevant settings of the OLD schema:
- RACF TAPEVOL class ACTIVE
- TAPEDSN INACTIVE in SETROPTS
-
On 06/28/2010 08:32 AM, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
Clark Morris wrote:
On 27 Jun 2010 07:30:35 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Until IBM provides a language or variant such as a systems flavor of
C/C++ that has access to all of the facilities (including the peculiar
linking
Joel C. Ewing wrote:
On 06/28/2010 08:32 AM, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
Clark Morris wrote:
On 27 Jun 2010 07:30:35 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Until IBM provides a language or variant such as a systems flavor of
C/C++ that has access to all of the facilities (including the
Kirk Wolf writes:
What I said was that WAS isn't light weight, either in terms of
resource usage or administration. Of course, no JEE app server
is really light weight - its a (IMO) bloated architecture. But
WAS is clearly the best, most robust, JEE app server on z/OS, and
I'm sure that it is
70 matches
Mail list logo
