On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:30:49 +0800, Tommy Tsui tommyt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I checked with GRSMON, there is nothing resource enqueue and can't
delete the file with rc IEC1611 rc=52 SFI=009 . Is there any way to
delete the VSAM file?
009SUBTSKMS - First open of a data set, not
I've explored the following:
(1) Issue a RACF ALU command from the console. I get the following:
IRRV003I (#) YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO ISSUE THE ALTUSER COMMAND AS AN
OPERATOR COMMAND.
Can you update PARMLIB? In particular, if you know the userid of a RACF
SPECIAL user, then
I don't see a way to do this, but maybe I'm just missing it. I am writing a
report which read the RACF database unload report. The report basically
shows IDs which have not been used in the last 90 days. This is rather
simple with a statement similar to:
INCLUDE
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:16:36 -0700, Frank Yaeger yae...@us.ibm.com wrote:
DFSORT/ICETOOL doesn't have any built-in function for calculating
n = (Current_date) - (-mm-dd)
Frank Yaeger - DFSORT Development Team (IBM) - yae...@us.ibm.com
Specialties: FINDREP, WHEN=GROUP, DATASORT, ICETOOL,
I'm a bit curious. If I understand what is being done, it is similar to a
Java JVM. The z/VOS reads and interprets the x86 arch instructions, with
some JIT on the side. However, other companies, such as AMD, need cross
licensing to create chips which run x86. That cross licensing is part of
IBM's
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:49:26 -0500, Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com
wrote:
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:36:42 -0500, John McKown wrote:
I'm a bit curious. If I understand what is being done, it is similar to a
Java JVM. The z/VOS reads and interprets the x86 arch instructions, with
some JIT
Is IEFACTRT on CBTTape file 109 still good (for z/OS 1.10)? I have a very
old version from IBM which appears to be giving wrong data. I.e. I look at
an SMF type 30 subtype 5 record and it says 109312 1/100ths of a second CPU
time. But looking at the output from the IEFACTRT exit on the job itself
I was told Tuesday that I must implement the CA-1 / RACF functions to
restrict use of EXPDT=98000 and BLP. Wednesday, I came down with something.
I'm now back with this deadline looming over me. I'm still a bit fuzzy
headed, so I'll ask the corporate intelligence for any advice on what I need
to
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:14:05 -0400, Dean Montevago
dean.montev...@vnsny.org wrote:
You have to turn on the various options to use external security
functions in CA-1's parmlib, so if the classes have a default rc=4 and
initally the functions are set to NO you should be ok. You can define
the
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:18:11 -0500, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:39:50 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote:
2009/3/17 Ulrich Krueger:
At my shop, when I was finally able to pinpoint where the SMTP performance
problems originated from, I was lucky. A single
in ascending sequence anyway. My replacement
was basically a read each file and do a 'match merge' of the transaction
with the master'.
--
Q: What do theoretical physicists drink beer from?
A: Ein Stein.
Maranatha!
John McKown
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, HyoungSeok Yim wrote:
help
Nice Beatle's song, but not on topic to this forum. Please try again.
--
Q: What do theoretical physicists drink beer from?
A: Ein Stein.
Maranatha!
John McKown
--
For IBM
'BPXWDYN' USING BPXWDYN-PARM
END-CALL
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/bpxzb680/6.6
--
Q: What do theoretical physicists drink beer from?
A: Ein Stein.
Maranatha!
John McKown
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:55:40 +0200, Itschak Mugzach imugz...@gmail.com wrote:
John,
Write a small rexx program that will read the number of records from the
catalog and then generate the appropriate IDCAMS control cards ;-) No empty
files, exact number of control cards, faster IO.
Itschak
I
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:50:52 -0500, Elardus Engelbrecht
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za wrote:
SNIP
2. Other solution is to write a COBOL/REXX program with dynamic allocation
and using a loop of 10 open/read/write/close. Read up the service
BPXWDYN.
You can use BPXWDYN in COBOL or REXX. This
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:36:21 -0600, Howard Brazee howard.bra...@cusys.edu
wrote:
I need to create a routine that can be used with a bunch of different
extracts to split files into new files of 100,000 records each. They
need to be FTPd to the same location with different names, but I don't
want
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:18:42 +0200, Itschak Mugzach imugz...@gmail.com wrote:
Idcams skip Count...
I don't think that would word in this case.
1) the OP wants CEIL(n/10) output files, where n is the number of
input records, which is not known beforehand. He stated that empty output
files
John Pape: Five ways to sabotage your chance of getting help from community
forums.
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/websphere/techjournal/0903_col_pape/0903_col_pape.html?S_TACT=105AGX01S_CMP=HP
--
John
--
For IBM-MAIN
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:21:48 -0400, Jerry Fuchs
jerry.fu...@wendysarbys.com wrote:
Mark,
My predecessor and DB2 guy did install directly into the root rather than
new files.
My problem now is how to carry that forward into z/OS 1.9.
Java was not ordered with z/OS 1.9 either.
Any ideas or am I
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:28:08 -0400, Bonno, Tuco t...@cio.sc.gov wrote:
THANK YOU. this example [infra] of bpxbatch works very well in terms of
solving my original problem/issue.
but it's at the expense of making it much more complicated (imo) to
process long complicated commands that go across 3
. This was very helpful when we were
learning the products.
IOW - we are really sold on the product. We also use their VDR and VTAR
products. We are very pleased with all three.
--
John McKown
HealthMarkets, Inc.
--
For IBM-MAIN
Or perhaps whatever has/will replace it? The reason that I ask is that it
seems that while DFSMSdfp clings tenaciously to the 3390 DASD architecture,
it is also using this interface (with 4K physical blocks) for all new I/O.
IIRC, it was first just a part of VSAM. I am not sure, but I'd bet that
than what the vendor thinks that they
can get away with. Even if the historical method actually costs more.
Business makes no sense to me.
--
Q: What do theoretical physicists drink beer from?
A: Ein Stein.
Maranatha!
John McKown
theoretical physicists drink beer from?
A: Ein Stein.
Maranatha!
John McKown
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 08:59:34 -0800, Kurt Eastwood kurtms...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello,
We are running an REXEC to a server running Redhat enterprise linux 5.3 and
receiving the following error. This was previously running to a server
running HP/UX 11.0 with no problems. Has anyone run into this
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 20:10:23 +, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
It must really be wonderful when all your customers keep up to date.
However, pontificating for those of us whose customers don't merely
demonstrates the limits of your experience.
Well said!
I've been at places that are
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 16:40:31 -0500, Gerhard Postpischil gerh...@valley.net
wrote:
Itschak Mugzach wrote:
Any other ideas?
Don't write code that branches into the middle of an instruction
- with proper choice of base registers and displacements, it's
possible to write a chain of code contained in
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 22:04:35 +, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
It wouldn't tell you much at my shop.
Users are penalized for coding REGION=0M and dropped down to the IEFUSI
default of 256M.
OTOH, one can get a larger region size by actually coding it here.
About 5 years ago I updated
I have looked on IBMLink and got no hits on this. So I thought I'd ask for
any ideas. We are running z/OS 1.8 on a z9BC. CICS/TS is release 3.2. We
have two different programs which abend with an S0C4-10 in CEECRINI at
offset x'2BC'. The abending instruction is L 4,4(,4) which is preceeded by a
L
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:26:41 -0500, Barkow, Eileen ebar...@doitt.nyc.gov
wrote:
see if CICS ptf UK40899 is on the system.
No, it is not.
if so, LE fix in pk73422 is required for z/os 1.9 - there may also be
something for z/os 1.8. the apar does not exactly match your problem but
there are
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:27:48 -0600, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com wrote:
snip
Any pointers? Oh, we are running RENTPGM=NOPROTECT because (IIRC)
Xpeditor
won't work otherwise.
Current releases (8.x) of Xpediter will work fine with RENTPGM=PROTECT.
-jc-
Thanks! I'll mention that to the main
I realize that most people likely use SAS for SMF reporting. We did this in
the past. Management has declared that SAS on the z is simply too expensive.
They also declared that installing the Windows version on our main user's PC
is also too expensive. End of discussion on that point.
So, what
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:32:49 -0600, Mark Zelden mark.zel...@zurichna.com
wrote:
What does hard money mean. Zero?
Correct. Hard money means a check made out to somebody. Soft money is
possible, but that basically means that __we__ do something to get the
report so our salary is paying for it.
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:02:25 -0500, Bill Fairchild bi...@mainstar.com wrote:
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 12:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: What do you call...
I got my Certificate in
I have a 43x162 working here on z/OS 1.10. However, to get it, I had to
specify a queryable logmode in my VTAM command which connected to the
system. E.g.
tso logmode(sna3270q)
where we created a logmode called SNA3270Q which has the query bit on. When
I didn't do this, I got a mod5 screen.
--
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:57:05 +, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
I know about IDCAMS, but the user wants a pure JCL solution.
Then the user is out of luck.
The best that can happen is there's a WTOR, to ask if it's okay.
And, I believe that's only if there is write activity to the
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:55:35 -0800, O'Mara, Kevin, ITD
kevin.om...@acgov.org wrote:
I contend that in Windoze Linux world, maybe most other operating
systems, there is at least one free C compiler readily available. When I
found that we did not have any C compiler, because of cost, I was very
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:10:02 -0600, P S zosw...@gmail.com wrote:
Do folks care about USS? That is, do most z/OS shops actually use
USS for anything beyond the things they're forced to (TCP/IP stuff,
for example)?
My experience suggests that the general answer is No (with
exceptions, of course).
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:41:24 +0900, Timothy Sipples e99...@jp.ibm.com wrote:
Now this is interesting
http://www.mantissa.com/SHARE-conference
- - - - -
Timothy Sipples
Looks like the web jockey totally messed up the HTML on that page. And all
the others that I looked at as well. It just
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:56:42 -0600, John McKown joa...@swbell.net wrote:
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:41:24 +0900, Timothy Sipples e99...@jp.ibm.com wrote:
Now this is interesting
http://www.mantissa.com/SHARE-conference
- - - - -
Timothy Sipples
Looks like the web jockey totally messed up
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:28:39 -0500, Tony Harminc tz...@attglobal.net wrote:
snip
It also seems inplausible that running Windows desktop on a z box is
going to make sense. Surely it will be Windows server flavours that
have the potential go move to big iron. And Windows servers are much
easier to
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:58:44 -0600, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
snip
There's little pride of craftsmanship left nowadays.
Management doesn't care and won't pay for it. If it works 80% of the time
and does 80% of what is required, and only costs half of what 100% would
cost, then
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:47:25 -0500, Mark Pace mpac...@gmail.com wrote:
Luminex used to have a product called VirtualBlue 3990. It was a PC with
ESCON cards to turned it into a 3990 emulator. I haven't worked with them
in a few years so I don't know if the product still exists.
FlexCUB at
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:54:30 -0600, Carlos Cordero jccorde...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Colleagues, somebody can help me to find what happen when i try to execute
a shell in z/OS?
the error is this:
Errno=82x The exec call contained a format error; Reason=5B4B000D. Press
Enter to continue.
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:28:07 -0600, Mark Zelden mark.zel...@zurichna.com
wrote:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:15:19 -0600, John McKown joa...@swbell.net wrote:
What confuses me is the SELECT RUN MEHTOD: DIRECT which I do not recognize
at all.
ISHELL pull down option under Tools to run a program
Carlos,
From looking at Mark's post, I have a few questions:
1) is the file you're trying to run marked with the eXecutable bit in the
directory. Be sure that when you check, you check the proper one (ie, the
owner and the group and the other section of the attributes).
2) If it is executable,
I'm installing z/OS 1.10 using the Internet download instead of tapes. Due
to the way that things are, the only option that I had was to download the
files to my Windows desktop, then ftp upload them to a z/OS UNIX directory.
Not really too bad. However, when I ran the installation dialog, the JCL
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:58:08 -0600, Eric Bielefeld eric-ibmm...@wi.rr.com
wrote:
I haven't heard anything about this new dasd, but I have a question. Why
would you want everything encrypted? If you have a dasd box in your
datacenter, what is the reason to encrypt all your data? I can see that
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:31:16 +, Eric Bielefeld eric-ibmm...@wi.rr.com
wrote:
Scott,
snip
I can see the value of encrypting data on PC hard drives, after all of the
problems people have had with stolen PCs with sensitive data on them, but
mainframe dasd? I just can't see it, or any
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:29:40 -0500, Dave Salt ds...@hotmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to help someone create a process that will automatically submit
several jobs at a time. For example, it might submit 20 jobs right after
each other, with only a fraction of a second between each job. It's very
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:19:53 -0800, Don Russell russell@gmail.com wrote:
BAL was pretty much obsolete when IPM came into existance. Unless of course
your code had to run on an old box. I have not come across an instance yet
when I needed BAL, and often use OPSYN to map BAL/R to BAS/R.
If I
Now this is interesting (to me). APAR OA25205.
PROBLEM SUMMARY:
* USERS AFFECTED: Users of DFSMS that use PDS or PDSE data *
* sets that require an SMF audit trail at *
* the member
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:53:03 -0600, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com wrote:
snip
This thread should also reinforce the notion, If you want it done
right, do it yourself. IOW, if you want GETMAINed storage to be
clean, then clean it yourself, every time you GETMAIN.
-jc-
I generally agree.
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:57:31 -0500, Mark Jacobs mark.jac...@custserv.com wrote:
Not exactly true. You can charge for LINUX, the question is will anyone
pay for it.
True. But we do pay for it. Why? Not for Linux, per se, but for the support.
And the support only comes when you buy that vendor's
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:39:32 -0500, Guy Gardoit ggard...@gmail.com wrote:
For the life of me, I can't understand why this is such a surprise or
problem. How many bad programmers were-there/are-there anyway?
Sorry, but one who breaks the rules, end ups broken.
Guy Gardoit
z/OS Systems
FileAid could do this sort of fix as well, if you have it. If you're really
masochistic, you could even use REXX!
--
John
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with
the following COBOL program will do what you want. Well, in my minor test it
did. Compiled with Enterprise COBOL 3.4.
000100 PROCESS MAP,TRUNC(OPT),OPTIMIZE,VBREF,XREF,APOST,LIST
000200 ID DIVISION.
000300 PROGRAM-ID. SMFALTER.
000400 AUTHOR. JOHN MCKOWN.
000500 INSTALLATION. HEALTHMARKETS, INC
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:52:11 -0600, Kirk Wolf k...@dovetail.com wrote:
John,
The JZOS Cookbook (on alphaWorks) has code samples and a nice little
class for reading RDW-delimited records. Not ugly at all :-)
Do these classes work on a non-z? I.e. are they pure Java? If not, then
that doesn't
Oh, you might also want to look at the CPYTOIMPF command on the iSeries. It
is built-in. But I don't really know what its output looks like.
iSeries info center is at:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/iseries/v5r4/index.jsp
--
John
I asked this question on the midrange-l forum and got the following response
from one person:
quote
You can go directly from I to Z via ftp. Beware of Date fields and
packed fields. Depending on which language the Z is going to use, it
may not be able to handle it.
When I do this, I make
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:10:12 -0500, Chauhan, Jasbir
jasbir.chau...@fiserv.com wrote:
One of my clients is running a DB2 application on an iSeries system (not
sure about the version). Their goal is to send us DB2 application data
in the form of a flat file that can then be loaded to a non-DB2
We are losing our SAS license. Cost containment. We are looking at getting
our main SAS user a Window desktop license so that he can continue to use
MXG. Apparently this is fairly popular.
But I was curious if anybody has ever used anything else, such as Java, to
process SMF data on a Windows or
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:36:21 -0800, Gibney, Dave gib...@wsu.edu wrote:
I would think it'd take a long time to redo the several thousand
man-years of work that MXG represents. And Dr. Merrill might get upset
if you were to just translate the SOURCLIB into Java or Whatever.
Dave Gibney
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:51:24 -0600, Scott Barry sba...@sbbworks.com wrote:
Most definitely consider the SAS-alternative WPS from World Programming
(WPS). The software runs most SAS Base application language, and it is
certified for MXG on both Windows and z/OS. The product is evolving and
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:59:23 -0600, Walt Farrell wfarr...@us.ibm.com wrote:
If you did decide to use Java, why does that require moving the data off of
z/OS?
Just curious...
--
Walt
1) no CPU power to run Java on our current system
2) no money to get a zAAP
3) Intel is dirt cheap compared to
cycles on z/OS vs. desktop?
-- gil
about 200 zillion to one grin. My desktop is basically free due to its
age.
--
Q: What do theoretical physicists drink beer from?
A: Ein Stein.
Maranatha!
John McKown
--
For IBM-MAIN
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:01:33 EST, Ed Finnell efinnel...@aol.com wrote:
Block all incoming port 23 on your switch to z/OS(s). Every now and then do
SMSG SMTP QUEUE to see if anything's passing the wrong way.
IIRC, port 23 is TELNET. SMTP is port 25.
Haven't heard all the fallout yet. Couple
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:28:21 -0600, Hal Merritt hmerr...@jackhenry.com wrote:
I've been asked to look into killing the SMTP service. We are very heavy
users of XMITIP, but inbound email is blocked at the firewall. However, that
does not seem to be good enough and we need to 'block the port' on the
It seems to me that I remember a COBOL version which had a NOTE verb. It
definitely is not in Enterprise COBOL. Am I once again confused, or did that
disappear in some primeval version?
--
John
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
theoretical physicists drink beer from?
A: Ein Stein.
Maranatha!
John McKown
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:30:22 -0500, Matt Dazzo mda...@pch.com wrote:
I found this site that has the z1.9 collection in PDF format, but they are
all separate down loads. Is there a site where they all be down loaded with
a single click? Thanks Matt
Slightly better script because the old one had an error:
#get all the pdfs
wget -O - \
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/df/zosv1r9paz.des |\
perl -p -e next unless m/ELM_DIRECT_NAME/;
if (m/\.pdf/) {
s/ELM_DIRECT_NAME//;
s/\//g;
print; } | \
while read i;do
wget
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:57:31 -0800, Natarajan Mohan nmo...@edfund.org wrote:
:-) If you really want to use wget on a windows box all you have to do is
search for unix tools for windows and you will land up in the URL
http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/
I use Cygwin. I should have mentioned that.
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:52:25 -0600, gsg gsg_...@yahoo.com wrote:
Is converting the HMC to Unix a fairly simple process? Anyone did this
recently?
TIA
You do this by the simple expedient of getting a brand new HMC. This is not
a customer installable device.
--
John
Just a quick question. We are running z/OS 1.8. Or disaster recovery site is
upgrading to a z10 or some sort. There are apparently PTFs needed to run
z/OS 1.8 on a z10. Are these PTFs still __required__ if z/OS is running
under z/VM?
--
John
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:58:06 -0600, Mark Zelden mark.zel...@zurichna.com
wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:36:58 -0600, John McKown joa...@swbell.net wrote:
I highly doubt you'll get a definitive answer because there any many PTFs
across different FMIDs. And it depends on what you mean by running
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:21:12 -0800, Patrick Falcone
patrick.falco...@verizon.net wrote:
Just checking, is there any other way to change the LPAR weights other than
HMC or the Service Element? No system commands that I'm aware of that allow
this, correct?
TIA...
z/OS does not come with any
Thanks for all replies. The problem is that our DR test is in February. It
is now 28 Jan. And I can only make changes on Infrastructure Weekends. I
simply don't see how I can get all these PTFs into my sandbox tested, then
into the development LPAR and test and then into the production LPAR and
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:31:55 -0800, Don Russell russell@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to submit a job from a VM system to one MVS system, have
it expand a JCL PROC, and submit those JCL statements to another MVS
system.
I cannot think of a way to do this. The JCL is expanded by the
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:18:36 -0600, Hal Merritt hmerr...@jackhenry.com wrote:
snip
All of which seem to point to environmental issues. Have you tried removing
power from your new desk lighting? Many modern offices are too bright anyway.
Too true! I know if keeps me awake!
--
John
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:49:24 -0800, Tom Ross tmr...@stlvm20.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
In one sense as someone who is sem-retired, I have no vested interest
other than as someone who believes that COBOL still MAY have a future.
My belief is that in order for that future to exist, COBOL programs or
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:58:11 -0600, Steve Horein steve.hor...@harcourt.com
wrote:
Hi listers,
Our core mainframe business application was sunset on 12/31/2008, with our
data migrating from the z platform to an SAP solution. Now we are faced with
what to do with data on tape (3490/3490E). Our mix
I forgot to mention that you can also attach SCSI tape drives to the FlexCUB
and use them for data storage instead of DASD. So, attach your LTO to the
FlexCUB and just copy the data.
--
John
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:38:57 -0600, Martin Kline martin.kl...@yrcw.com wrote:
I prefer to order GDGs with odd generations in LIFO order followed by the even
generations in FIFO order - except on the second Tuesday of the month,
when I want to read the data backwards in random file sequence. Why
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:53:01 -0600, Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com
wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:06:41 -0600, John McKown wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:38:57 -0600, Martin Kline wrote:
You can't satisfy everyone. I suspect it was a performance choice made many
years ago. For whatever
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:55:22 -0600, Anton Britz antonbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I still do not understand how these companies, listed on Wall Street can use
their Labor force as a Make our Financial Results look good resource ?
snip
Single word: greed. On the part of management and the
Ed will likely need to reply. However, it could be simply that the zSecure
Audit function is simply not aware of what the EJES SVC does and so flags
it. There is an SVC in CICS which could be considered problematic if one did
not know how it worked internally to ensure that it is not called
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:43:36 -0800, Edward Jaffe
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote:
Ulrich Boche wrote:
Recently, I ran a zSecure Audit MVS Tables status scan and one of its
findings was the following:
I have never heard of zSecure.
IBM's rebranding of the old Consul/RACF products.
--
John
the encoding be for
local time or GMT? OK, it's a stupid idea.
--
Q: What do theoretical physicists drink beer from?
A: Ein Stein.
Maranatha!
John McKown
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
Is there any way to ftp a UTF-16 encoded file from Windows to z/OS 1.8,
converting it to CP-037 or CP-1047? What about z/OS 1.10? I'm a bit confused
by the 1.10 documentation on this.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:00:25 +0100, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote:
John McKown wrote:
Is there any way to ftp a UTF-16 encoded file from Windows to z/OS 1.8,
converting it to CP-037 or CP-1047? What about z/OS 1.10? I'm a bit confused
by the 1.10 documentation on this.
Wild
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:28:10 -0700, Steve Comstock
st...@trainersfriend.com wrote:
John,
What are you using the data for on z/OS?
I don't have any idea.
* You can browse UTF-16 data
(browse the file then on the command line, enter === disp utf16 )
This didn't work for me. It said it did,
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:49:58 -0600, Kirk Wolf k...@dovetail.com wrote:
John,
You could write a simple Java program to convert from UTF-16LE to
IBM-1047/IBM-037.
Java supports UTF-16 encoding as its native encoding for characters, but
uses a BOM to determine endian, whereas UTF-16LE does not.
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:49:58 -0600, Kirk Wolf k...@dovetail.com wrote:
John,
You could write a simple Java program to convert from UTF-16LE to
IBM-1047/IBM-037.
Java supports UTF-16 encoding as its native encoding for characters, but
uses a BOM to determine endian, whereas UTF-16LE does not.
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:26:16 -0600, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Sewell, Raymond K.
[ snip ]
This Lpar does not work. z/os 1.7 operating system.
C:\Documents and Settings\rksewellftp 10.73.6.160
Connected
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:26:34 -0700, Steve Comstock
st...@trainersfriend.com wrote:
snip
Many thanks! I don't know if my boss will go for this or not. I just ordered
z/OS 1.10, which supposedly can handle UTF-16. Of course, that's going to
take a while to get in and installed.
I don't
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:53:30 -0600, Kirk Wolf k...@dovetail.com wrote:
John,
- If you change the code to use a BufferedReader/BufferedWriter with
readLine() and then write()/newLine() , then it will handle any line end
combo you give it. The output will use the lineend convention of the
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:47:26 -0600, Lieven Borgs lieven.bo...@sun.com wrote:
Hi,
Does Z/OS 1.8 and above still support the 3278 device type and is only the
hardware support for the real physical 3278's dropped?
We are on z/OS 1.8. We have a Visara control unit which is Escon attached to
our
I know this is not directly applicable. However, there may be mainframe
shops which are using the RDz (or whatever IBM is calling it this week) IDE
in addition to ISPF. RDz is based on Eclipse. I've never gotten the hang of
Eclipse. These articles may help.
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:07:10 -0200, Carlos Bodra cbo...@terra.com.br wrote:
Hi Listers, (xposted to VSE-L and OS/390 List)
I need to read an IBM 3490 cartridge recorded by OS/390 program in a
Linux system. If this works fine in intel server, I can migrate it to
Linux under mainframe later.
I
501 - 600 of 915 matches
Mail list logo
