Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 24 Mar 2012 to 25 Mar 2012 (#2012-85)

2012-03-25 Thread Roadrunner-dsm
On Mar 26, 2012, at 12:00 AM, IBM-MAIN automatic digest system lists...@bama.ua.edu wrote: There are 6 messages totaling 209 lines in this issue. Topics of the day: 1. Grace Hopper Stories!! (was RE: Pre-Friday fun: Halon dumps and POK Resets) (2) 2. LE C calling HLASM 3. COBOL

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 4 Mar 2012 to 5 Mar 2012 (#2012-65)

2012-03-07 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In cf4c9114ed956d49a019f58166d918570a346...@tjaxp80093dag.csxt.ad.csx.com, on 03/06/2012 at 08:39 PM, Pate, Gene gene_p...@csx.com said: By PCFLIH backdoor I mean a routine whose address replaced the address of the IBM supplied PCFLIH. That's not what the others were using the term to mean.

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 4 Mar 2012 to 5 Mar 2012 (#2012-65)

2012-03-06 Thread Pate, Gene
on 03/05/2012 at 20:54:38, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net said: What do you mean by backdoor? I don't believe that it is what others were referring to. By PCFLIH backdoor I mean a routine whose address replaced the address of the IBM supplied PCFLIH. The backdoor routine

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 4 Mar 2012 to 5 Mar 2012 (#2012-65)

2012-03-06 Thread Tom Marchant
On Tue, 6 Mar 2012 20:39:02 +, Pate, Gene wrote: By PCFLIH backdoor I mean a routine whose address replaced the address of the IBM supplied PCFLIH. That would be a hook or an intercept. Backdoor means something else entirely. The backdoor routine received control every time a PC interrupt

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 21 Feb 2012 to 22 Feb 2012 (#2012-53)

2012-02-23 Thread Marc Holiwell
INFO IBM-MAIN GET IBM-MAIN INFO -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 21 Feb 2012 to 22 Feb 2012 (#2012-53)

2012-02-23 Thread Ed Finnell
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN In a message dated 2/23/2012 10:31:55 A.M. Central Standard Time, holiwe...@co.kern.ca.us writes: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 13 Feb 2012 to 14 Feb 2012 (#2012-45)

2012-02-15 Thread Jim Holloway
Natasa, If as you say, you are synchronously mirroring your DASD, I would make the following suggestion. Add the new CF to your current CFRM policy at your old site and acticvate. You'll have no connectivity to it so you can't allocate it locally. Your CFRM CDS gets mirrored with the

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 31 Dec 2011 to 1 Jan 2012 (#2012-1)

2012-01-03 Thread zMan
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote: David Boyes dbo...@sinenomine.net said: Big hassle: the illustrations in the older manuals are in APF format, which isn't documented anywhere. What gives you that idea? Well now, let's use our

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 31 Dec 2011 to 1 Jan 2012 (#2012-1)

2012-01-03 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In cafo-8tqm4mjredrfxy8vzyloa2byq6r+o25aargc-92qdou...@mail.gmail.com, on 01/03/2012 at 01:24 PM, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com said: Well now, let's use our imaginations, boys and girls. Presumably he has that idea because he's been unable to find any such documentation. I've been unable to

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 31 Dec 2011 to 1 Jan 2012 (#2012-1)

2012-01-03 Thread Roger Bolan
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 9:21 AM, David Boyes dbo...@sinenomine.net wrote: Big hassle: the illustrations in the older manuals are in APF format, which isn't documented anywhere. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 31 Dec 2011 to 1 Jan 2012 (#2012-1)

2012-01-03 Thread Roger Bolan
If you were referring to the pictures in the BookManager format of the book, rather than the AFP format, then see http://publibfi.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr/BOOKS/EPHZ2L03/4.2.10?SHELF=DT=20050922160211CASE= for an explanation. On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Roger Bolan rogerbo...@gmail.com

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 31 Dec 2011 to 1 Jan 2012 (#2012-1)

2012-01-02 Thread David Boyes
I am wondering how difficult it would be for IBM to publish their manuals in .mobi or .epub format. This would make them much more readable on cell phones or other media such a the newer Kindles or Nook ebook reader. It would even help on netbooks, laptops, and desktop as it wouldn't force

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 31 Dec 2011 to 1 Jan 2012 (#2012-1)

2012-01-02 Thread Martin Packer
: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker From: David Boyes dbo...@sinenomine.net To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu, Date: 02/01/2012 16:24 Subject: Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 31 Dec 2011 to 1 Jan 2012 (#2012-1) Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu I am

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 31 Dec 2011 to 1 Jan 2012 (#2012-1)

2012-01-02 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In 03ff351977a6114a9e3bc166d58e936d0323ba3...@dfw1mbx18.mex07a.mlsrvr.com, on 01/02/2012 at 10:21 AM, David Boyes dbo...@sinenomine.net said: Big hassle: the illustrations in the older manuals are in APF format, which isn't documented anywhere. What gives you that idea? -- Shmuel

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 12 Nov 2011 to 13 Nov 2011 (#2011-317)

2011-11-14 Thread Torre, Ronald P
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of IBM-MAIN automatic digest system Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 12:00 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: IBM-MAIN Digest - 12 Nov 2011 to 13 Nov 2011 (#2011-317

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest

2011-09-26 Thread Jim Heifetz
Every message I get in the digest includes this at the end: For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO But when I sent an email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with that message, I got

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest

2011-09-26 Thread Lizette Koehler
...@sears.ca Sent: Sep 26, 2011 10:56 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: IBM-MAIN Digest Every message I get in the digest includes this at the end: For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 12 Sep 2011 to 13 Sep 2011 (#2011-256)

2011-09-14 Thread David Boyes
BTW, what is #39,t mean? I see it frequently, is it encrypted cursing? Hahaha No, it's an attempt by smart mail user agents to insert a fancy apostrophe character instead of using the single quote. The 39 is the hex character code for the apostrophe.

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 4 Jul 2011 to 5 Jul 2011 (#2011-186)

2011-07-06 Thread John Watson
IBM-MAIN NODIGEST -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 4 Jul 2011 to 5 Jul 2011 (#2011-186)

2011-07-06 Thread Steve Conway
...@au1.ibm.com To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Date: 07/06/2011 05:37 AM Subject:Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 4 Jul 2011 to 5 Jul 2011 (#2011-186) Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu IBM-MAIN NODIGEST

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 16 Jun 2011 to 17 Jun 2011 (#2011-168)

2011-06-30 Thread Kurland, Jeff B
T From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Sent: Sat Jun 18 00:00:04 2011 Subject: IBM-MAIN Digest - 16 Jun 2011 to 17 Jun 2011 (#2011-168) This message has been archived.

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 20 Jun 2011 to 21 Jun 2011 (#2011-172)

2011-06-22 Thread Daanen, Patrick
Please remove me Patrick J. Daanen From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of IBM-MAIN automatic digest system Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 11:00 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: IBM-MAIN Digest - 20 Jun 2011 to 21 Jun 2011 (#2011-172) [http

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 20 Jun 2011 to 21 Jun 2011 (#2011-172)

2011-06-22 Thread Ted MacNEIL
-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 20 Jun 2011 to 21 Jun 2011 (#2011-172) Please remove me Patrick J. Daanen From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of IBM-MAIN automatic digest system

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 9 Jun 2011 to 10 Jun 2011 (#2011-161)

2011-06-11 Thread Dan Blake
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:27:22 +0530 Jags asks... Since Our Jes2 spool percentage has reached to 100% and even after purging all the old jobs percentage level didnt go down. I tried starting the Jes2 in COLD by giving /Replyid,COLD,NOREQ but it was not taking up and it was throwing a message like

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 9 Jun 2011 to 10 Jun 2011 (#2011-161)

2011-06-11 Thread Ted MacNEIL
Until all those queue elements are purged JES2 will not reflect the output is purged and release the spool space. I thought that was changed aeons ago (circa OS/390 V2R5). - Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca Twitter: @TedMacNEIL

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 9 Jun 2011 to 10 Jun 2011 (#2011-161)

2011-06-11 Thread Mike Schwab
Through ST, it is all there until the last file is gone. On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote: Until all those queue elements are purged JES2 will not reflect the output is purged and release the spool space. I thought that was changed aeons ago (circa OS/390

Automatic reply: IBM-MAIN Digest - 31 May 2011 to 1 Jun 2011 (#2011-152)

2011-06-01 Thread David Magee
I'll be out of the office until Monday, June 13th. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 11 Apr 2011 to 12 Apr 2011 (#2011-102)

2011-04-14 Thread McKown, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Scott Rowe Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 4:42 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 11 Apr 2011 to 12 Apr 2011 (#2011-102) Don't ignore IE (Internet Express

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 11 Apr 2011 to 12 Apr 2011 (#2011-102)

2011-04-14 Thread Kirk Talman
...a shoddy piece of dishonest marketing nonsense... how many levels of redundant redundancy is contained in that phrase? Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur. IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu wrote on 04/14/2011 08:21:07 AM: From: McKown, John

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 11 Apr 2011 to 12 Apr 2011 (#2011-102)

2011-04-13 Thread Frisbie, Jim
I would submit that the plural of virus is probably Windows. From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of IBM-MAIN automatic digest system Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 12:00 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: IBM-MAIN Digest - 11 Apr 2011 to 12 Apr 2011

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 11 Apr 2011 to 12 Apr 2011 (#2011-102)

2011-04-13 Thread Staller, Allan
snip From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Frisbie, Jim Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 7:38 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 11 Apr 2011 to 12 Apr 2011 (#2011-102) I would submit that the plural of virus is probably Windows

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 11 Apr 2011 to 12 Apr 2011 (#2011-102)

2011-04-13 Thread Rick Fochtman
snip-- I would submit that the plural of virus is probably Windows. /snip More precisely Microsoft Outlook -unsnip- Don't ignore IE

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 11 Apr 2011 to 12 Apr 2011 (#2011-102)

2011-04-13 Thread Ted MacNEIL
Don't ignore IE (Internet Express). More holes than a screen door! INTERNET Explorer. Sent wirelessly from my BlackBerry device on the Bell network. Envoyé sans fil par mon terminal mobile BlackBerry sur le réseau de Bell. --

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 11 Apr 2011 to 12 Apr 2011 (#2011-102)

2011-04-13 Thread Scott Rowe
Don't ignore IE (Internet Express). More holes than a screen door! INTERNET Explorer. Internet EXPLODER! CONFIDENTIALITY/EMAIL NOTICE: The material in this transmission contains confidential and privileged information intended only for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient,

Automatic reply: IBM-MAIN Digest - 12 Jan 2011 to 13 Jan 2011 (#2011-13)

2011-01-13 Thread David Magee
I'll be out of the office until Monday, Jan 17th. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 17 Dec 2010 to 18 Dec 2010 (#2010-352)

2010-12-19 Thread DKM
From: IBM-MAIN automatic From: IBM-MAIN automatic digest system lists...@bama.ua.edu To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Sent: Sat, December 18, 2010 11:00:03 PM Subject: IBM-MAIN Digest - 17 Dec 2010 to 18 Dec 2010 (#2010-352

Re: z/OS, TCP/IP, and OSA (Was: Some rubbish starting with IBM-MAIN Digest)

2010-10-13 Thread Chris Mason
David I'm sorry for the late response here. Although I responded swiftly after the original post of 14 Sept questioning how the Communications Server (CS) IP component could possibly communicate to the outside world without the aid of OSA features, I merely indicated that quite a lot

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 21 Sep 2010 to 22 Sep 2010 (#2010-265)

2010-09-22 Thread David Boyes
Essentially I'm looking for a method of identifying MVS images so that I can talk to my agent running in each of those images. If my agent is not running on an image then neither is any other of my software. Take a look at the Zeroconf project. You can easily have your agent announce itself,

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 19 Sep 2010 to 20 Sep 2010 (#2010-263)

2010-09-21 Thread Scott Ford
There is another one, i an ware of Anynetwhether it is used any more, I dont know.   Scott J Ford   From: David Boyes dbo...@sinenomine.net To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Sent: Tue, September 21, 2010 12:36:06 AM Subject: Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 19 Sep 2010 to 20

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 19 Sep 2010 to 20 Sep 2010 (#2010-263)

2010-09-21 Thread Staller, Allan
AFAIK ANYNET is no longer supported. Replaced w/Enterprise Extender snip There is another one, i an ware of Anynetwhether it is used any more, I dont know. /snip -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access

AnyNet, dead or alive? (Was: Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 19 Sep 2010 to 20 Sep 2010 (#2010-263) - Was: z/OS, TCP/IP, and OSA)

2010-09-21 Thread Chris Mason
Allan AFAIK ANYNET is no longer supported. This is one of those points that is very easy to discover from the on-line manuals - just as the original question was, come to think of it - and, more recently a probably for which the exact opposite is a certainty. I may find sufficient energy to

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 19 Sep 2010 to 20 Sep 2010 (#2010-263)

2010-09-20 Thread David Boyes
No real issue, just thought I would ask. I couldn't think of anything other than an OSA for TCP/IP communication. I had forgotten about the CIPS from CISCO. There are a fair number of devices that work with IBM TCPIP (both for VM and for MVS). Some other fun ones: 7170(basically

Auto Reply: IBM-MAIN Digest - 21 Jul 2010 to 22 Jul 2010 (#2010-203)

2010-07-22 Thread Mark Jones
I'm on vacation, I'll be back Monday the 2nd of August. - Mark -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - COBOL text to HEX print

2010-06-16 Thread DIANE BLAUW
-- Date:Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:46:16 -0400 From:Donald Johnson dej@gmail.com Subject: Re: Cobol routine to convert TEXT to displayable HEX Well, here is what I decided to use. I broke my text field into 100-byte segments (based on report requirements), and

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 6 Apr 2010 to 7 Apr 2010 (#2010-97)

2010-04-08 Thread Jim Holloway
Barbara Nitz wrote: Unscientific survey: How many of you use truly non-SMS-managed LOGR datasets? As in: Using the two model data sets and an IEFDB401 exit that specifies the DALLIKE text unit? Question1 : Ours are all SMS managed. Question 2: We don't share a poolfor logger datasets

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 29 Mar 2010 to 30 Mar 2010 (#2010-89)

2010-03-30 Thread Robert Wrobel
Please note my new email address is rwrob...@csc.com. Please update your address book or distribution list. Thank you. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 9 Dec 2009 to 10 Dec 2009 (#2009-344)

2009-12-11 Thread Frisbie, Jim
Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of IBM-MAIN automatic digest system Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 12:00 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: IBM-MAIN Digest - 9 Dec 2009 to 10 Dec 2009 (#2009-344) /PREThis email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole

IBM-MAIN Digest subscription cancellation

2009-11-01 Thread Johnson, Kraig A
, please delete this e-mail and any files transmitted with it and notify the sender immediately. From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of IBM-MAIN automatic digest system Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 11:00 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: IBM-MAIN

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest subscription cancellation

2009-11-01 Thread Ed Finnell
In a message dated 11/1/2009 10:07:39 A.M. Central Standard Time, kraig.john...@ca.com writes: to these emails. My job has changed and I no longer need this information. For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest subscription cancellation

2009-11-01 Thread Gibney, Dave
Truly interesting job title :) -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Johnson, Kraig A Sent: Sunday, November 01, 2009 7:57 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: IBM-MAIN Digest subscription cancellation Please cancel

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest subscription cancellation

2009-11-01 Thread P S
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Gibney, Dave gib...@wsu.edu wrote: Truly interesting job title :) Probably an internal title -- my favorite internal CA title is Client Base Owner, or CBO -- which a friend immediately rechristened Chief Bulls**t Officer!

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 6 Sep 2009 to 7 Sep 2009 (#2009-250)

2009-09-07 Thread Stephen Hall
___ Note: This e-mail is subject to the disclaimer contained at the bottom of this message. ___ Date:Mon, 7 Sep 2009

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 23 Aug 2009 to 24 Aug 2009 (#2009-236)

2009-08-25 Thread Jim Holloway
On Monday, August 24, 2009 6:55 AM Barbara Nitz wrote: Let's restate the question: How many of you can use RECEIVE FROMNETWORK directly, without starting other supporting programs? We do all IBM maintenence downloads via network receive excluding our annual Serverpac install, the download for

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 8 Aug 2009 to 9 Aug 2009 (#2009-221)

2009-08-11 Thread Petretti, Martha
How do I post a question? Martha Petretti 15 MTC rm 15-417 ph 718 510-8565 cell 347 587-9486 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of IBM-MAIN automatic digest system Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 12:00 AM To: IBM-MAIN

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 8 Aug 2009 to 9 Aug 2009 (#2009-221)

2009-08-11 Thread Barkow, Eileen
Digest - 8 Aug 2009 to 9 Aug 2009 (#2009-221) How do I post a question? Martha Petretti 15 MTC rm 15-417 ph 718 510-8565 cell 347 587-9486 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of IBM-MAIN automatic digest system Sent

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 8 Aug 2009 to 9 Aug 2009 (#2009-221)

2009-08-11 Thread Chase, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Petretti, Martha How do I post a question? You just did. -jc- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to

Re: How Do I post a question? (was IBM-MAIN Digest - 2 Aug 2009 to 3 Aug 2009 (#2009-215))

2009-08-05 Thread Jan MOEYERSONS
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 06:53:14 -0600, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com wrote: Petretti, Martha wrote: How do I post a question? Well, you just did. Send an email to IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Be sure to set the Reply-to to be the same. and, PELEAEAESE!,

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 2 Aug 2009 to 3 Aug 2009 (#2009-215)

2009-08-04 Thread Petretti, Martha
How do I post a question? Martha Petretti 15 MTC rm 15-417 ph 718 510-8565 cell 347 587-9486 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of IBM-MAIN automatic digest system Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 12:00 AM To: IBM-MAIN

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 2 Aug 2009 to 3 Aug 2009 (#2009-215)

2009-08-04 Thread Campbell Jay
Just like that. Jay -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Petretti, Martha Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 8:45 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 2 Aug 2009 to 3 Aug 2009 (#2009-215) How do I post

Re: How Do I post a question? (was IBM-MAIN Digest - 2 Aug 2009 to 3 Aug 2009 (#2009-215))

2009-08-04 Thread Steve Comstock
- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of IBM-MAIN automatic digest system Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 12:00 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: IBM-MAIN Digest - 2 Aug 2009 to 3 Aug 2009 (#2009-215) There are 71 messages totalling 4038 lines in this issue

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 10 Jul 2009 to 11 Jul 2009 (#2009-192)

2009-07-13 Thread Thompson, Steve
Sent from my Dick Tracy Two-Way Wrist Radio. Nanny Nanny Boo Boo! -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Johnson, Larry W. Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 12:11 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 10 Jul 2009

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 10 Jul 2009 to 11 Jul 2009 (#2009-192)

2009-07-11 Thread Johnson, Larry W.
Sent from my ATT Windows Mobile phone. From: IBM-MAIN automatic digest system lists...@bama.ua.edu Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 11:03 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: IBM-MAIN Digest - 10 Jul 2009 to 11 Jul 2009 (#2009-192

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 13 May 2009 to 14 May 2009 (#2009-134)

2009-05-15 Thread Frisbie, Jim
printer (Issue Intervention Message and Issue Setup messages). Other than getting the Network guys to run me some wire, I had no problems. Jim Frisbie NCSECU Dinosaur From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of IBM-MAIN automatic digest system Sent: Friday

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 7 May 2009 to 8 May 2009 (#2009-128)

2009-05-09 Thread Jim Holloway
Barbara, It may very well be that SYSLOG has always stopped at either $PJES2 or the Z EOD command being issued. I don't remember it that way nor does anyone else in the shop. So for us, it's something new and exciting We've updated OPERLOG to duplex so that we don't lose

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 7 Apr 2009 to 8 Apr 2009 (#2009-98)

2009-04-08 Thread Clark Pearson
I am away from the office, returning Wednesday 15th April. If necessary, I shall respond to your message when I return. If your query is regarding Thames Collections support, please contact the BSD, or if urgent, the Service Management team. For CES Archived Account printing, refer to Courtney

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 16 Mar 2009 to 17 Mar 2009 (#2009-76)

2009-03-18 Thread Timothy Sipples
I think you should also look at IBM's Optim Data Growth Solution for z/OS. Current product number is 5655-V01. There's a general marketing brochure here (watch the wrap): http://download.boulder.ibm.com/ibmdl/pub/software/data/sw-library/data-management/optim/solutionsheets/data_growth.pdf

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 26 Jan 2009 to 27 Jan 2009 (#2009-27)

2009-01-28 Thread E. Rabara
Ah! The not on a weekend schedule. Have you considered initiating the file transfer the other way around? Let your trading partner accumulate the data until you pick it up and have your program include a jobstep to pick up the file when it is ready to use it? Hopefully the file is not too big.

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 18 Jan 2009 to 19 Jan 2009 (#2009-19)

2009-01-19 Thread gah
Someone wrote: USING FRED,15 FRED CSECT B SAVE-*(15) What value is in register 1 here? L 15,0(1) What is in register 15 here? Remember, R15 is still the only base register, and will be used in the next instruction... B RETURN SAVE DS 0H STM 14,12,12(13)

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 31 Dec 2008 to 1 Jan 2009 (#2009-1)

2009-01-02 Thread Jim Holloway
Lizette, It seems that the behavior I described is the expected behavior for the console service if either BPX.CONSOLE is not defined or it is defined but the caller does not have the proper permissions. At my shop, BPX.CONSOLE is not defined so I receive the BPXM023I message with the

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 25 Jun 2008 to 26 Jun 2008 (#2008-178)

2008-06-29 Thread Chris Mason
David You risk your efforts being lost in the archives if you don't take care that the Subject is properly filled in. I picked this up only because I knew of the subject types to which you normally contributed. Chris Mason

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 25 Jun 2008 to 26 Jun 2008 (#2008-178)

2008-06-27 Thread David Boyes
Kind of a weird question I know, but ... it has been a day full of weird questions. A customer would like to know if they can open a TN3270 session *from* one z/OS host, to another z/OS host? Certainly. I'm typing this in one right now. I do not believe this is possible. For a start, you

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 3270 Mac

2008-06-12 Thread Nigel Bowen
-Original Message- From: Nigel Bowen Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 8:26 AM To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: IBM-MAIN Digest - 10 Jun 2008 to 11 Jun 2008 (#2008-163) For 3270 emulation, BlueZone is the way to go. For an older MAC we use BlueZone

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 26 Apr 2008 to 27 Apr 2008 (#2008-118)

2008-04-27 Thread gah
Someone wrote: If I recall correctly, FORTRAN/PLI needed explicit exponentiation, i.e., DOUBLE A,B . A = B+1.23 would use a short 1.23 rather than determining that the other operands were double thus 1.23 should be treated as a double as well. One had to do A =

DIGEST

2008-04-23 Thread Rob Weiss
DIGEST -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Logging successful attempts was Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 13 Apr 2008 to 14 Apr 2008 (#2008-105)

2008-04-16 Thread Clark Morris
On 15 Apr 2008 06:56:28 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:01:51 -0700, Skip Robinson wrote: -- Date:Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:01:51 -0700 From:Skip Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SMF in System Logger In the absence of

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 13 Apr 2008 to 14 Apr 2008 (#2008-105)

2008-04-15 Thread Jim Holloway
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:01:51 -0700, Skip Robinson wrote: -- Date:Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:01:51 -0700 From:Skip Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SMF in System Logger In the absence of CF Sizer assistance ;-( I looked at the samples from IBM and

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 27 Dec 2007 to 28 Dec 2007 (#2007-362)

2007-12-29 Thread David Boyes
If I have an IPL'd Stand Alone system running on the New z9 and zVM/CMS is installed; can I take a Full volume dump on zOS; ftp it to zVM/CMS; save the file and then use this file as input to the Stand Alone Restore process? If so how? z/OS utilities only understand z/OS I/O, so you would

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 26 Dec 2007 to 27 Dec 2007 (#2007-361)

2007-12-28 Thread David Boyes
2. Connect new server to the existing disk or old server to the new disk systems - not possible, the old system has only internal disk and the new disk is FICON and cannot be connected to the old processor. You could consider turning the Flex box into a FlexCUB temporarily, which would make

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 7 Sep 2007 to 8 Sep 2007 (#2007-251)

2007-09-09 Thread David Boyes
What does that mean? Do you want to know which manual describes the Bookmaster tags? Do you think they released the libraries you include when executing Document Composition Facility (a.k.a. SCRIPT) to the public? No. A SGML DTD is a syntax description of the tags in a formalized grammar

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 19 Aug 2007 to 20 Aug 2007 (#2007-232)

2007-08-21 Thread David Boyes
The issue is quite possibly scalability. Only a tiny fraction of Solaris users need huge machines, and scalability is something IBM is quite good at. It might make good business sense for Solaris to cede the very top end to IBM and avoid the huge expense of extreme scalability when

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 2 Aug 2007 to 3 Aug 2007 (#2007-215)

2007-08-06 Thread O'Mara, Kevin, ITD
Gil, I really liked this, and had to run and try it. Of course it worked like a charm. I have forever been mapping this char, in the emulation, to a key I actually have somewhere on the PC. But then the PC gets swapped, or 'upgraded', or I'm at home 'dialed-in', and have I remembered to map the

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 15 Jul 2007 to 16 Jul 2007 (#2007-197)

2007-07-17 Thread Timothy Sipples
Dave Barry, a great name, writes: The Windows command prompt is the legacy of MS-DOS, and so on. In turn, the 80 column DOS command prompt is a legacy of punch cards. The 80 column card format was established back in the 1920s. One might also say that base 10 arithmetic is a legacy of ten

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 24 Mar 2007 to 25 Mar 2007 (#2007-84)

2007-03-26 Thread Betsy Jeffery
I have downloaded the latest version of GDGCOPY from the CBT tape and have had no issues with it under z/OS 1.7 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message:

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 21 Mar 2007 to 22 Mar 2007 (#2007-81)

2007-03-23 Thread Henry Daries
Hi. Can anyone explain why I cannot access the info in this email. If trying the access items in the contents list the url shows #S1 for the first item and #S2 for the second, etc. For the items in the body of the email the address shows cid---BAMA.UA.ED, etc. The address to browse the

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 17 Feb 2007 to 18 Feb 2007 (#2007-49)

2007-02-19 Thread glen herrmannsfeldt
From:Clark Morris wrote: I believe that MFT and MVT went unsupported in 1977. My shop ran unsupported until the 1980's (Westinghouse Lamp Divisions, yes the plural is accurate for at least some of the period). Due to water on our mod 65 we also ran MVT on a 4341. 1977 sounds earlier

Re: [UNSCANNED INBOUND] IBM-MAIN Digest - 28 Dec 2006 to 29 Dec 2006 (#2006-364)

2007-01-02 Thread turner, mark
Hello listers, happy new year! In the last 30 minutes I received an email (I think it was from this list) that mentioned a zOS redbook and some other redbooks. If it came from this list, would someone please send me the links for the redbooks? Thanks in advance. Mark Turner

Re: [UNSCANNED INBOUND] IBM-MAIN Digest - 28 Dec 2006 to 29 Dec 2006 (#2006-364)

2007-01-02 Thread Richards.Bob
] IBM-MAIN Digest - 28 Dec 2006 to 29 Dec 2006 (#2006-364) Hello listers, happy new year! In the last 30 minutes I received an email (I think it was from this list) that mentioned a zOS redbook and some other redbooks. If it came from this list, would someone please send me the links

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 17 Dec 2006 to 18 Dec 2006 (#2006-353)

2006-12-22 Thread glen herrmannsfeldt
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: (after someone else wrote) Only if you want to match up with the vendor numbers. ;). Disk x-bytes are always in multiples of 10 instead of powers of 2 Always is a long time. There is no industry standard; even a unit of 2^10*10^3 is or was common. For disks

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 17 Dec 2006 to 18 Dec 2006 (#2006-353)

2006-12-22 Thread glen herrmannsfeldt
(snip on instruction fetch vs. execution exceptions) one of the reasons that 360/67 had an 8-entry associative array (dlat, tlb, etc) ... was the worse case for EXECXUTE of SS instructions required eight different page addresses. EX (execute) of another instruction 2 pages - instruction

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 6 Nov 2006 to 7 Nov 2006 (#2006-312)

2006-11-08 Thread Tom Russell
From:Tommy Tsui [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Query on z109 BOOK concept If I use z109 S18 that means two books and allow 18 CPs maximum. If I select 508 and fill up the book1. Can I order another 508 to fill up the book2 so that the maximum CPs are 16. Or, I only can select 709 model if CP no

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 5 Oct 2006 to 6 Oct 2006 (#2006-280)

2006-10-08 Thread John Dravnieks
Art If you know that you are running on a z/Architecture machine, then you could use the STore Facility List (STFL) instruction to help you decide what is available or not (though this does lead to dual- pathing your code which you may not want to do) STFL is priviliged but z/OS does issue it

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 19 Aug 2006 to 20 Aug 2006 (#2006-233)

2006-08-22 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 08/21/2006 at 09:07 AM, Rick Fochtman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Benjamen, ISTR that a RECFM=U, LRECL=255,KEYLEN=8 brought in a key as well as the actual block. Shirley you mean RECFM=U, LRECL=256, KEYLEN=8, BLKSIZE=264. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 19 Aug 2006 to 20 Aug 2006 (#2006-233)

2006-08-21 Thread Rick Fochtman
---snip Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 12:28:43 -0400 On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 09:54:17 -0500 Rick Fochtman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: :You can also use QSAM GETs to read the directory. And if you specify a KEYLEN=8 , you can

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 18 Aug 2006 to 19 Aug 2006 (#2006-232)

2006-08-20 Thread Rick Fochtman
snip-- In respect of your query about EXCP with DEB: Hello: Does anyone have any sample code that does I/O (read only) by manually building a DEB? (Bypassing OPEN and CLOSE.) .. I want to be able to read the directory

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 18 Aug 2006 to 19 Aug 2006 (#2006-232)

2006-08-20 Thread Rick Fochtman
---snip--- The presence of bank vaults in the world means that there must also be locksmiths in it who can open them, and I suppose that there is a similar rationale for the skills needed to breach z/OS, but this is a public forum in which I

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 18 Aug 2006 to 19 Aug 2006 (#2006-232)

2006-08-20 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 09:54:17 -0500 Rick Fochtman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : snip-- : In respect of your query about EXCP with DEB: : Hello: Does anyone have any sample code that does I/O (read only) by : manually building a DEB?

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 18 Aug 2006 to 19 Aug 2006 (#2006-232)

2006-08-20 Thread Paul Gilmartin
In a recent note, Binyamin Dissen said: Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 12:28:43 -0400 On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 09:54:17 -0500 Rick Fochtman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: :You can also use QSAM GETs to read the directory. And if you specify a KEYLEN=8 , you can see the key of each block, so you

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 3 Aug 2006 to 4 Aug 2006 (#2006-217)

2006-08-05 Thread Rick Fochtman
---snip--- If there's anybody out there old enough, they'll remember Assembler-G, from University of Waterloo, with it's temporary update facility. You supplied updates in IEBUPDTE format in a separate input file. The Assembler would

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 25 Jul 2006 to 26 Jul 2006 (#2006-208)

2006-07-26 Thread John Dravnieks
Jeffrey You might like to inspect X'A3' - the low order bit will on if the machine is in z/Architecture mode. If you are on any z/Series hardware then you might be able to use STore Facility List instruction, STFL. 'Might' because this is a privileged instruction and it updates the fullword at

Re: IBM-MAIN Digest - 24 Jun 2006 to 25 Jun 2006 (#2006-176)

2006-06-26 Thread Kacur, Wayne
Please stop sending me this. Take me off the mailing list for this. Thanks Wayne -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf of IBM-MAIN automatic digest system Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 12:00 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject

  1   2   >