Shmuel Metz asks:
You don't think that, e.g., the Honeywell H-200, IBM 650, IBM 1401,
RCA 301, UNIVAC 1004, UNIVAC SS-80/SS-90, had already destroyed the
reproducer and tabulator markets and that the ubiquity of tape drives
had already destroyed the collator and sorter market?
Heading in that
I have to ask. What's harm of defining a couple 1 cylinder (or 2 track) OCDS,
BCDS that will remain empty and unused?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of nitz-...@gmx.net
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 9:14 PM
To:
I have to ask. What's harm of defining a couple 1 cylinder (or 2 track) OCDS,
BCDS that will remain empty and unused?
'Business reasons'.
I just didn't understand why something that looks to have correct syntax is
getting a syntax error. Turns out that it *should* be correct. I will just
W dniu 2013-07-11 22:02, Tom Ambros pisze:
OK, I'll try and make it clear.
PR/SM Planning Guide spells out that at partition activation the initial
storage allocation is made in contiguous segments.
If you follow the sequence of the scenario I presented, you'll see that I
am in fact asking
Anthony,
SAS provided the modifications to PDS86 for access to PDSE's in cylinder
managed space on EAV. Download from CBT Updates page.
Regards,
John K
-IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu wrote: -
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
From: Anthony Fletcher
Sent by: IBM
Q1.You can add the second segment, which you must have defined as Reserved
Storage in the LPAR's Activation Profile, with the command: CF STOR(E=1),ON
If you then Reset the system without the Clear option, the Reserved Storage
remains allocated to the LPAR, if you Reset with the Clear option,
John,
When did they do that? Is there a newer version than 86?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John P Kalinich
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 6:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: PDS86 EAV compatibility
Has anyone seen this error before and found that it is *not* that the RACF
subsystem had not been started/activated (per SIS search in IBMLINK)?
Any clue would be helpful. Seeing this on a new standalone lpar on a brand new
zEC12.
Was working yesterday. IPL'ed...no joy...same problem.
Bob
This is what I could find,
IKJ56646I IKJEFRAF FAILED - RETURN CODE return_code.
Explanation:
IKJEFRAF passed an unexpected return code to IKJEFT01. The UPT, and other
information associated with the user id could not be obtained. This message
will be followed by IKJ56644, which indicates that
How about the shutdown?
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1OA37537
-Original Message-
From: Richards, Robert B. [mailto:robert.richa...@opm.gov]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 7:10 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: TSOLOGON TERMINATED. IKJEFRAF ERROR 016
Has anyone
Thanks Neil and Anthony.
I got a hold of a coworker and he was playing around with the RACF ICHRIX01
signon exit on that system. I'll let him resolve it...he is on his way in.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of
Hello group,
I vaguely remember reading, quite some time ago, about a function to
imbed/include coding into ACS routines. E.g. if you have large
filtlists, you code them in a separate member on your ACSsource and have
them read (included) into your ACS routine at compile time. The
advantage
Nevermind, I downloaded the latest package, and see the updates. I wish that
CBt would display the revision level of the PDS86. I always just assumed that
since it was still 8.6 that the code wasn’t being changed.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Richards, Robert B. wrote:
I got a hold of a coworker and he was playing around with the RACF ICHRIX01
signon exit on that system. I'll let him resolve it...he is on his way in.
Playing with such exits without warning you? For his career safety, it helps it
is on a new LPAR on a new toy, but
Hi Timothy,
You make many interesting points in your email. I think there are some
things about IBM that you don't know, although that may not be the case.
As many of you know, I worked a little over 3 years for IBM until February
this year in Dubuque, Iowa. They have a very high turnover
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2013i.html#71 Future of COBOL based on RDz policies
was Re: RDz or RDzEnterprise developers
2nd hand about testimony in the gov. legal action ... claim that top
executive from one of the seven dwarfs testified that by the late 50s
every computer company realized
sipp...@sg.ibm.com (Timothy Sipples) writes:
Power servers are a good example of a success. IBM is the leader in the
distributed UNIX server market and by quite a margin. Yet rewind the clock
a couple decades and *nobody* would have predicted that. IBM doggedly,
persistently focused on
Eric Bielefeld wrote:
begin extract
One other thing I didn't like was the computer operations was usually
run from India. Many of the people were very sharp, but it was very
hard to understand them.
/end extract
Unfamiliar accents are hard to understand; and Americans in particular
often have
Ladies and Gentlemen,
My =3.4 reports my RMM CDS using 41910 tracks and 5 extents.
My LISTCONTROL CNTL reports Utilization = 97%.
What does this Utilization tell me?
Should I expand the size of the CDS for a little breathing room or just size
the CDS with enough space for 0 extents and let it
W dniu 2013-07-12 17:36, Schroeder, Wayne pisze:
Ladies and Gentlemen,
My =3.4 reports my RMM CDS using 41910 tracks and 5 extents.
My LISTCONTROL CNTL reports Utilization = 97%.
What does this Utilization tell me?
Should I expand the size of the CDS for a little breathing room or just size
As of z/OS a do by hand function. Would be useful as part of the ACS language :)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 5:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: ACS
I will be interested in the answer. I know you cannot have more than 255
entire in one filtlist. But I was not aware of any include function
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: Gibney, Dave gib...@wsu.edu
Sent: Jul 12, 2013 9:15 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ACS routine
I'm basing everything I'm doing on the Principles of Operations manual
(POM). The Z/Architecture is the final authority for any program even
MVS.
An interesting opinion. But I'd say not overly relevant. Sure, you can
consider the Principles of Operation to be the final authority for what
the
Actually, I should have added that most of the time when we did IPLs or
upgrades, we used Sametime to communicate with the people from India. Their
English is actually pretty good. There was enough times when we had voice
chats up though that often made things hard.
I have to admit that I
Sorry about the garble. The include function available to ACS routines is that
of the editor. There is still value to a separate member(s) for common code,
FILTLIST in particular. But it is a manual function to pull them into each
member before compiling.
Dave Gibney
Information Technology
I just found the PASSWORD clause in Enterprise COBOL for z/OS V4.2
Reference, as a part of file specification.
Now the question: what password can be specified in the clause?
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie chronione Banku
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 20:05:16 +0200, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote:
I just found the PASSWORD clause in Enterprise COBOL for z/OS V4.2
Reference, as a part of file specification.
Now the question: what password can be specified in the clause?
My guess would be that it's for the
Peter Relson's most recent post seems to me to strike the right note.
That the PrOp makes a hardware feature available is a necessary but
not a sufficient condition for its availability under an operating
system, any operating system. (I know of one old proto-OS that
effectively blocked all use
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2013i.html#71 Future of COBOL based on RDz policies
was Re: RDz or RDzEnterprise developers
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2013i.html#73 Future of COBOL based on RDz policies
was Re: RDz or RDzEnterprise developers
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2013i.html#74 Future of
On Jul 12, 2013, at 1:37 AM, Timothy Sipples wrote:
---SNIP--
IBM never seems to have acquired or internalized the value of the
concept of a loss leader.
I'm not 100% sure what you mean by loss leader here. Certain pricing
practices can
On Jul 12, 2013, at 10:33 AM, John Gilmore wrote:
In the past Timothy has argued that market forces will over time
adjust IBM salaries upward where they are too low. This does not
always happen. The market for displaced, ageing IBM z/OS sysprogs in
those parts of the world where the number of
Greetings ,
I know this is a silly question . Unfortunately I am not good at ISPF and needs
some help to fix a problem .
I have a problem with SRCHFOR command in ISPF . Normally , when a srchfor
command is issued by passing a string in 3.4 , it returns a response 'String(s)
found or not
I was testing using PDS 8.6 14.2 which I believe is the latest version.
The Tracking is still occurring, so there must be some code that hasn't
been updated. Can't tell whether the number of cases has reduced.
We don't have any EAV volumes on the system I was using so this must be
against
You need 8.6.14.4. I don't know if you have to request it or if the CBT is
current.
See: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cbt-tape/message/448
In article
of66ce2cb1.a8256d93-oncc257ba6.0077aa08-cc257ba6.007ae...@nz1.ibm.com you
wrote:
I was testing using PDS 8.6 14.2 which I believe is the
Roger
SRCHFOR, might be a REXX/CLIST that does that or an ISPF Command table
entry.
The easiest thing to do is use ISRDDN
TSO ISRDDN on any command line
Then issue
M SRCHFOR
See where it turns up
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Hello Lizette ,
Thanks for quick response . I had already tried that , but it didn't show up
.(It says member not found ) . I suspect that something is missing from my
logon proc , but not able to locate what exactly it is .
From: Lizette Koehler
Hello ,
I just did a TSO ISRDDN and tried to locate SRCHFOR member , even for me it
says member not found . But in my system , srchfor works as normal . So , i
guess the invocation happens in a different way . BTW , which release of z/os
are you using ?
Regards,
Bob
Date: Fri, 12 Jul
Can you post your logon proc JCL?
SRCHFOR should be a command table entry (I think), therefore it should not
be found in the LOGON Proc. In Opt 3 is the CMD table function, see what
you are using there. ISF or a user defined table.
The other option,
Type in on the Command line
TSO ISPVCALL
I suggest that you run your searches in batch (it's faster, allows you
to search for multiple strings in multiple PDSes and also writes the
'hard-copy' output to a sequential dataset) - as follows:
//*---*
//* 'SEARCH FOR' IN
Here it is again, hopefully formatted correctly this time grin ...
I suggest that you run your searches in batch (it's faster, allows you
to search for multiple strings in multiple PDSes and also writes the
'hard-copy' output to a sequential dataset) - as follows:
IBMLink appears to be down. Not sure if it is IBMLink or the auth
server yet. Guy on the line told me to try later, but I got a SEV 1 HEAH!!
Regards,
Tom Conley
--
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
John spake thus:
: The market for displaced, ageing IBM z/OS sysprogs in
: those parts of the world where the number of mainframe shops is
: declining steadily has almost none of the characteristics of a
: traditional 'free' labor market.
Careful fella, I resemble that.
Timothys platitudes
Hello,
Apology if this was question was repetitive.
Is it possible to fetch Users Logon detail based on IPADDR from SMF ?
IPADDR is the source IP from where the users open up the IBM 3270 emulator.
The objective is for User logon id audit.
Any idea or suggestions are appreciated.
Z/OS : 1.13
What tools will you use to get this data?
REXX, SAS/MXG, SAS/MICS, Tivoli?
There is a utility on the CBTTAPE.ORG called DAF. It is assembler but
breaks down most SMF records.
Check it out and see if it can help answer your question.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
I can give you whatever level of detail you want on this question. The IP
address (IPv6, but easy to make into an IPv4 address) is in the Type 119
record, subtype SNA Initiation. The format is IIRC in one of the Comm
Server books. I can find it if you need.
The SNA Init record will give you the
On 7/8/2013 5:55 AM, Kenneth Wilkerson wrote:
... most of the stuff I write is RMODE64.
Wow! That's ambitious!
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
46 matches
Mail list logo
