found the prob ...a bad sys config file entry..
mace
At 06:50 AM 8/7/2006, Jim Bohnsack wrote:
As a junior assistant probationery trainee IBM systems engineer in
a Chicago branch office, I worked on a project that needed a lot of
data center machine time. I ran a benchmark for a custom at the IBM
Des Plaines data center and used a 360/40 that
If I had known about that (CICS development), maybe I would have snipped a
wire or two. At that time, I was installing (separate project) a S/360/40
at different IBM Chicgo customer running FASTER, which was another,
comparable online system that, I believe, was developed initially by the
At 07:16 AM 8/7/2006, you wrote:
If I had known about that (CICS development), maybe I would have
snipped a wire or two. At that time, I was installing (separate
project) a S/360/40 at different IBM Chicgo customer running FASTER,
which was another, comparable online system that, I believe,
I think that the biggest reason for keeping it in a DCSS is that it is
important code that you really don't want the casual user to muck around
with. How many problems have we all had to dig into only to find out that
there is a private copy of the XYZ EXEC on the user's a-disk that gets used
Hello all,
I have a question regarding the use of ESAALERT. I am playing with the
configuration files and trying to determine appropriate levels at which to take
action, or at least start sending messages screaming to people.
I'm curious as to what others have done with this.
Title: Removing NETVIEW
Since IBM is dropping VSAM for VM we are eliminating NETVIEW on our VM systems.
It has left some 'remnants' of its previous life on our VM systems.
At system IPL right after the 'directory is brought online' message we see:
HCPCRC8080I NETVIEW is not connected to
On Monday, 08/07/2006 at 10:51 AST, Smith, Ann (ISD, IT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since IBM is dropping VSAM for VM we are eliminating NETVIEW on our VM
systems.
It has left some 'remnants' of its previous life on our VM systems.
At system IPL right after the 'directory is brought online'
Doesn't SYSPROF execute BEFORE the user's A disk is accessed? If that's
the case, no problem with them having a copy on their A disk - it will
never execute ahead of the system version on MAINT 190 (or 19E).
Michael Coffin, President
MC Consulting Company, Inc.
57 Tamarack Drive
Stoughton,
The problem is that IE ignores the content-type header.
In Windows Help search for - 258452
In which the cause is described as -
'Internet Explorer is RFC compliant, but does not take into account some
deviations that are allowed within the specification'
Sounds like a fancy way to say the
Title: RE: Signal support
I am waiting breathlessly. Has the highly-placed and respected person at VSE developement responded, and cleared the air?
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU]On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Thursday, August
Title: RE: Signal support
Only breathlessly? EMS had to come to revive my blue-toned
face multiple times over the weekend! :)
David Wakser
From: Huegel, Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 11:58 AMTo:
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUSubject: Re: Signal
support
I am
Does anyone know where I can get a trial version of Websphere App Server
for Linux on zSeries machine? I have version 5 (and 5.0.2) but I was wanting
something a little more current. It would need to be 64bit
Thanks,
Steve
On Monday, 08/07/2006 at 10:58 EST, Huegel, Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am waiting breathlessly. Has the highly-placed and respected person at
VSE
developement responded, and cleared the air?
This just in...
Yes, VSE did briefly add registration for the LPAR deactivation signal
Tomangle Terry Pratchett, a one-in-a-million-chance will come
through nine times out of ten.
Jon
snip
I have an entry in the RTABLE to
look for NOT in positions 10 thru 13. The last three letters of the file name just so happen
to be in 10 thru 13. What are the
chances?
You're right. I forgot about that, altho I still hold that going to the
bother of removing SYSPROF from INSTSEG is bit-twiddling.
Jim
At 11:43 AM 8/7/2006, you wrote:
Doesn't SYSPROF execute BEFORE the user's A disk is accessed? If that's
the case, no problem with them having a copy on their
If somebody wants to write up a WAVV requirement, I would vote for it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This just in...
Yes, VSE did briefly add registration for the LPAR deactivation signal
(SIGNAL SHUTDOWN), but the implementation was incomplete and created other
problems. In particular, VSE
Since IBM is dropping VSAM for VM we are eliminating NETVIEW on our VM
systems.
Netview has me confused. I also was under the
impression that it required VSAM (I remember all the
VSAM work I had to do in order to get it up and
running), but, in spite of the demise of VSAM, I still
see on
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 11:43:13 -0400 Michael Coffin said:
Doesn't SYSPROF execute BEFORE the user's A disk is accessed? If that's
the case, no problem with them having a copy on their A disk - it will
never execute ahead of the system version on MAINT 190 (or 19E).
Actually, SYSPROF accesses the A
19 matches
Mail list logo
