SMTP on VM

2006-10-17 Thread Marcy Cortes
Is SMTP that comes with our TCP/IP on 5.2.0 RFC2821 and RFC2822 compliant? Inquiring minds wanna know... Marcy Cortes This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy,

Re: SMTP on VM

2006-10-17 Thread Miguel Delapaz
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 10/17/2006 11:13:33 AM: Is SMTP that comes with our TCP/IP on 5.2.0 RFC2821 and RFC2822 compliant? Inquiring minds wanna know... Marcy Cortes I don't belive any work was specifically done to update the server to be RFC 2821

Sharing unassigned tape

2006-10-17 Thread Shimon Lebowitz
Hi, I am starting to set up z/VM 5.2, and I got to the step that says to take a backup of NSS files. Since our tapes are VTS, and the 5.2 system does not yet have DFSMS set up, I figured I could mount a tape on a VTS drive in my 4.4 system, using the NOASSIGN option of DFSMSRM MOUNT, and

Re: SMTP on VM

2006-10-17 Thread Marcy Cortes
Hi Miguel. I have this from the powers that be: Certified systems, at a bare minimum, are required to fulfill the minimal functionality requirements described in Section 4.5 of RFC 2821, the address-handling requirements described in Section 5 of RFC 2821, and the problem detection and

Re: Sharing unassigned tape

2006-10-17 Thread Mike Walter
Shimon, I'm guessing that the z/VM 520 ATTACH command is causing an unload. Perhaps try attaching the drive on both systems with NOASSIGN, then mount it on 4.4 and try using it on 5.2. That may prevent the unload from the ATTACH on 520, it having been done before the tape was mounted. Mike

Re: Sharing unassigned tape

2006-10-17 Thread Imler, Steven J
Shimon, Does you z/VM 5.2 guest have STDEVOPT LIBRARY CTL in its directory entry? Even though DFSMS is not running yet, you may still need it to access and use the VTS devices on the guest? JR JR (Steven) Imler CA Senior Software Engineer Tel: +1 703 708 3479 Fax: +1 703 708 3267 [EMAIL

Re: Sharing unassigned tape

2006-10-17 Thread Romanowski, John (OFT)
Shimon, Is the 5.2 system a guest of 4.4 (not sure from your post)? If so, I would DFSMSRM MOUNT the tape to the guest userid and on 5.2 system just ATTACH the tape drive to MAINT at 181 and use the virtual cartridge. Skip the NOASSIGN stuff.

Re: SMTP on VM

2006-10-17 Thread Miguel Delapaz
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 10/17/2006 11:41:24 AM: Hi Miguel. I have this from the powers that be: Certified systems, at a bare minimum, are required to fulfill the minimal functionality requirements described in Section 4.5 of RFC 2821, the

Re: Sharing unassigned tape

2006-10-17 Thread Stephen Frazier
You message was unclear. Is z/VM 5.2 running as a guest of z/VM 4.4? If it is is XMSL the userid that z/VM 5.2 is running in? If both questions are yes then on the z/VM 4.4 system you need to have as the response to Q 0A10 be TAPE 0A10 ATTACHED TO XMSL 0A10 R/W The tape needs to be attached

Fw: SMTP on VM

2006-10-17 Thread Miguel Delapaz
Marcy, Here is the response from our SMTP developer. Also, posting to the listserv for anyone else who is/was interested. If you have any more questions/concerns please let us know! Regards, Miguel Delapaz z/VM TCP/IP Development - Forwarded by Miguel Delapaz/Endicott/IBM on 10/17/2006

MVMRUG Meeting Agenda Addition - Time to Register is Running Out

2006-10-17 Thread Moore, Terry A.
Cross posted to MVMRUG-L, IBMVM-L and LINUX-390 I am please to say that we will have added ashort presentation on Mainstar's Provisioning Expert product to the agenda for the upcoming MVMRUG meeting in Columbus, Ohio on October 27. The full slate now includes: Update on z/VM

Re: Sharing unassigned tape

2006-10-17 Thread Shimon Lebowitz
On 17 Oct 2006 at 14:52, Romanowski, John (OFT) wrote: Shimon, Is the 5.2 system a guest of 4.4 (not sure from your post)? If so, I would DFSMSRM MOUNT the tape to the guest userid and on 5.2 system just ATTACH the tape drive to MAINT at 181 and use the virtual cartridge. Skip the

Re: Sharing unassigned tape

2006-10-17 Thread Mike Walter
Well, we're sort of doing the same thing with a Sun/STK VTS. VM:Tape requests the mount, and gets the drive attached to itself. VM sends a '.MOUNT' command to z/OS to get the tape mounted by z/OS. When the tape is mounted on the z/OS system (same drive address, not only a different LPAR, but a

Re: Sharing unassigned tape

2006-10-17 Thread Marcy Cortes
I kind of went through a similar thing last week with 2 5.2.0 systems. Try a Detach with a leave option from the writing system, then vary off from there. Then try it on the other system. Marcy Cortes This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the

Re: Sharing unassigned tape

2006-10-17 Thread Shimon Lebowitz
On 17 Oct 2006 at 17:46, Mike Walter wrote: Well, we're sort of doing the same thing with a Sun/STK VTS. VM:Tape requests the mount, and gets the drive attached to itself. VM sends a '.MOUNT' command to z/OS to get the tape mounted by z/OS. When the tape is mounted on the z/OS system

Re: Sharing unassigned tape

2006-10-17 Thread Shimon Lebowitz
On 17 Oct 2006 at 14:49, Imler, Steven J wrote: Shimon, Does you z/VM 5.2 guest have STDEVOPT LIBRARY CTL in its directory entry? Even though DFSMS is not running yet, you may still need it to access and use the VTS devices on the guest? JR, I meant to respond to your post in my last

Re: Sharing unassigned tape

2006-10-17 Thread Imler, Steven J
Yes ... After you clarified this is not a 2nd level guest, the directory entry certainly no longer applies. However, I think Marcy may have something ... Try it, you'll probably like it! JR JR (Steven) Imler CA Senior Software Engineer Tel: +1 703 708 3479 Fax: +1 703 708 3267 [EMAIL