AUTO: Victor Boyarintsev is out of the office. (returning 20.09.2010)

2010-09-15 Thread Victor Boyarintsev
I am out of the office until 20.09.2010. I will respond to your message when I return. In urgent cases please contact my manager, Sergey Ludushkin. Note: This is an automated response to your message "IBMVM Digest - 14 Sep 2010 to 15 Sep 2010 (#2010-237)" sent on 16/9/10 9:12:45. This is the o

Re: VSM - TCPIP

2010-09-15 Thread Jim Bohnsack
IBM-I've Been Moved---even if not relocated. Jim On 9/15/2010 9:28 PM, Chip Davis wrote: And I guess Scott has the honor of the last IBMVM problem solved by Alan as a developer... :-/ I hope Alan enjoys the "deeper, more direct experience" he's going to have with us. If it weren't for all th

Re: VSM - TCPIP

2010-09-15 Thread Chip Davis
And I guess Scott has the honor of the last IBMVM problem solved by Alan as a developer... :-/ I hope Alan enjoys the "deeper, more direct experience" he's going to have with us. If it weren't for all the traveling... -Chip- On 9/16/10 00:30 Scott Rohling said: Ok - #1 helps a little (but I

Re: VSM - TCPIP

2010-09-15 Thread Scott Rohling
Ok - #1 helps a little (but I'm assuming a real user can end up by itself on a line too) - #2 a bit more (yes, sneaky) - #3 even more, but probably going a little far unless I'm going for 6 Sigma or something :-) Probably will stick with tossing VSM user cuz I'm a lazy old cuss. The good news fo

Re: VSM - TCPIP

2010-09-15 Thread Rich Smrcina
On 09/15/2010 05:57 PM, Alan Altmark wrote: Alan Altmark z/VM Development (T minus 05h 05m 42s and counting...) IBM Endicott Hours? How time flies... -- Rich Smrcina Velocity Software, Inc. Mobile: 414-491-6001 Office: 262-392-3717 http://www.velocitysoftware.com Catch the WAVV! http://www.

Re: VSM - TCPIP

2010-09-15 Thread Alan Altmark
On Wednesday, 09/15/2010 at 07:46 EDT, Scott Rohling wrote: > Ok - so this is about linemode sessions. And yeah - I get the crickets - who > the heck uses linemode? I suppose it fits. I always have a grin on my face > when I explain virtual reader/punch/printer to non-z/VM folk. > > Th

Re: VSM - TCPIP

2010-09-15 Thread Scott Rohling
Ok - so this is about linemode sessions. And yeah - I get the crickets - who the heck uses linemode? I suppose it fits. I always have a grin on my face when I explain virtual reader/punch/printer to non-z/VM folk. The consistency factor is me expecting the first word in front of the dash (-)

Re: VSM - TCPIP

2010-09-15 Thread Alan Altmark
On Wednesday, 09/15/2010 at 06:35 EDT, Scott Rohling wrote: > Just wondering if anyone else sees the value in finding "VSM - TCPIP" as an > entry when doing a 'CP QUERY NAMES'. I do, I do! > This is described as being the users of > the VTAM service machine ... As someone who often wri

Re: VSM - TCPIP

2010-09-15 Thread David Boyes
VM Tcp uses the VTAM linemode console support to do linemode telnet (not tn3270) support. Do a telnet to your VM system and log in, then do a q names. You'll see user - TCPIPn as a 'terminal id'. At the time that code was written, I don't think LDEVs did line mode and there was a requirement

Re: CP unresponsive on certain guests

2010-09-15 Thread Dave Jones
Hi, Daniel. The answer to your first question is to use the CP FORCE command (HELP CP FORCE will tell you all about it.) The VM user id issuing the FORCE command needs to have privilege class A as well. Usually this is done from either MAINT or OPERATOR. The answer to your second question is a b

VSM - TCPIP

2010-09-15 Thread Scott Rohling
Just wondering if anyone else sees the value in finding "VSM - TCPIP" as an entry when doing a 'CP QUERY NAMES'. This is described as being the users of the VTAM service machine ... As someone who often writes system utilities which do a QUERY NAMES to find the active users - this is always

Re: CP unresponsive on certain guests

2010-09-15 Thread Mike At HammockTree
When you do the IND LOAD (or just IND), does the E3 field have any non-zero number? If yes, then you have formed a Eligible list. You should investigate and understand the implications, but the "quick fix" is to set a more "reasonable" SRM STORBUFF value, for example: CP SET SRM STORBUFF 300%

Re: CP unresponsive on certain guests

2010-09-15 Thread Marcy Cortes
Q SRM And let us know what that says. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Daniel Tate Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 3:15 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: [IBMVM] CP unresponsive on certain guests We're star

Re: CP unresponsive on certain guests

2010-09-15 Thread McBride, Catherine
FORCE username entered from another user name works well providing "another user name" has the correct privileges. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Daniel Tate Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 5:15 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSER

CP unresponsive on certain guests

2010-09-15 Thread Daniel Tate
We're starting to run apps on the servers now. From time to time a guest will become unresponsive - to be more precise, ,the CP will not respond to commands, and neither will the guest OS (SLES11). not even #CP LOGOFF is acknowledged. from another login, CP INDIIC LOAD shows no appreciable loa