At 2005-08-19 13:32:33 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the prevailing atmosphere???
Right. I can answer that question better now, mostly by having studied
the responses in this thread. Let's have a look, shall we?
1. Denial. What's wrong with the atmosphere, dammit?
2. Proof-by-anecdote that
hassath wrote:
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 22:45, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
And Pankaj, this thread repeatedly will raise its ugly head because
this issue has not been resolved. I am not sorry that it causes
discomfort in your complacent world.
I am neither discomforted by the discussion nor am I
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 12:25, Pankaj kaushal wrote:
I am neither discomforted by the discussion nor am I complacent, merely
un-interested in discussions without a result.
If there is a result-less discussion, maybe you could take more
responsibility for it- you too are part of this list. What
hi,
I get a license expire notice when I try to login using cpanel on some
remote server.
This is usually corrected within minutes but some cases we may not be
aware of the issue.
I don't know why it does this. sometimes it takes numerous tries to get
in.
Somebody help me about this matter??
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 12:07, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
At 2005-08-19 13:32:33 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the prevailing atmosphere???
Right. I can answer that question better now, mostly by having studied
the responses in this thread. Let's have a look, shall we?
1. Denial. What's
Pardeep == Pardeep Garg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pardeep hi, I get a license expire notice when I try to login
Pardeep using cpanel on some remote server.
Pardeep This is usually corrected within minutes but some cases
Pardeep we may not be aware of the issue.
Pardeep I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hassath == hassath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hassath [snip]
Hassath Thanks ams- i agree with all your points. I want to add
Hassath another one, which i have mentioned in my response to
Hassath Pankaj- the freedel blog has a
Fair enough. The attempt at humour was supposed to
achieve the
reverse of what you are reading it as, but that
doesn't make a
difference in this context.
As I see it, we have two options open to us:
- - Everyone introspect and figure out ways of doing
things right so
that more
On Monday, 22 Aug 2005 1:19 pm, hassath wrote:
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 12:25, Pankaj kaushal wrote:
I am neither discomforted by the discussion nor am I complacent, merely
un-interested in discussions without a result.
If there is a result-less discussion, maybe you could take more
Nitin Chandra wrote:
--if i may add the fourth option
where by women can accept men as they are and STILL
come forward and make a difference rather than be in
the stand and comment.
Well thats the standard arguement accept us as we are .
So one is not expected to change for the better.
hassath wrote:
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 12:25, Pankaj kaushal wrote:
If there is a result-less discussion, maybe you could take more
responsibility for it- you too are part of this list. What a typically
privileged attitude - Oh, nothing comes out of these discussions! If
you saw it as being in
On Monday, 22 Aug 2005 2:32 pm, Raj Mathur wrote:
Fair enough. The attempt at humour was supposed to achieve the
reverse of what you are reading it as, but that doesn't make a
difference in this context.
Actually Raj, now that I have re-read it, I agree with Hassath that it is
*potentially*
Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
Hassath, let us discuss this without getting bitter. I understand the
frustation, and I do agree with AMS that atmosphere in the LUG meets is
something that will make women (or children or any elderly people)
uncomfortable.
Sandip this bitterness - which you
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 15:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well thats the standard arguement accept us as we are .
So one is not expected to change for the better.
men are abusive so let them be - accept them as they are
men can harass women - accept that
men can use crude and filthy
Hassath
On the other hand, perhaps they need to hear more of the other
perspective...
Regards,
But it always helps to have the other around. In fact the more others
the better it will get I hope
ram
___
ilugd mailinglist --
At 2005-08-22 02:48:17 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
where by women can accept men as they are and STILL come forward
and make a difference rather than be in the stand and comment.
Which nicely removes all responsibility from you, and allows you to say,
with a straight face, that the problem
On Monday, 22 Aug 2005 3:56 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sandip this bitterness - which you see - is not being able to get an
important issue across. Check out the number of typical male mails
As I said, I understand the reason behind the bitterness, but being bitter
never helps in having a
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Nitin Chandra wrote:
--if i may add the fourth option
where by women can accept men as they are and STILL
come forward and make a difference rather than be
in
the stand and comment.
Well thats the standard arguement accept us as
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 15:33, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
On Monday, 22 Aug 2005 1:19 pm, hassath wrote:
Hassath, let us discuss this without getting bitter. I understand the
frustation, and I do agree with AMS that atmosphere in the LUG meets is
something that will make women (or children or
hi,
the first thing that comes to mind is that if the bsnl
adsl device is connected to the switch directly then
it has to be a router. I believe bsnl is giving away
huawei routers with some connections.
if this is the case then you dont have to do anything
other than setting both pcs to dhcp as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ram == ramnarayan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ram [snip]
Ram Again why somebody with experience - why make someone else
Ram responsible for the clean up - is this clean up going to be
Ram restricted to the list - thats one way . But
If you are using Firefox then have a look at Adblock extenstion and load
a filterset from Filterset.G (http://www.pierceive.com/)
Thanks... it worked!
Nandz.
--
http://nandz.blogspot.com
___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
Just one quibble in isolation:
At 2005-08-22 15:33:13 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sigh. See how difficult being politically correct all the time is?
Sandeep, it's not about being politically correct. At all. Ever.
Everyone thinks political correctness is ridiculous, including women,
At 2005-08-22 03:54:17 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well I HAVE BEEN CATCALLED N WISTLED BY GROUP OF WOMEN UNKNOWN TO ME
OH MY GOD! THOSE SHAMELESS HUSSIES!
How *dare* they complain about oppression or exclusion?!
Women just need to jump in and get the language barrier resolved
during
Couple of things that can be done are as follows :
1. You use suexec and take let AMS have fun with his bots.
2. You do a sudo and have the same problem as above. In both cases you
just hope there are no bugs in your implementation which would result
in your system being hacked or made useless
Hi,
I was wondering whether there is any consious decission not to allow
the mailing lists to be indexed by the search engines. There has been
quite a few emails I would like to refer back to but I find them
impossible to find on google atleast.
I believe we have a pretty decent sized archive of
Mithun == Mithun Bhattacharya [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mithun Hi, I was wondering whether there is any consious
Mithun decission not to allow the mailing lists to be indexed by
Mithun the search engines. There has been quite a few emails I
Mithun would like to refer back to but
On Monday, 22 Aug 2005 9:41 pm, Mithun Bhattacharya wrote:
My only concern is that there is no easy way to search the mailing
lists effectively. Google provide a effective search tool sourceforge
doesnt.
How about trying the gmane archive instead?
- Sandip
--
Sandip Bhattacharya *
--- Raj Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They're indexed as far as I can make out:
http://www.google.com/search?q=linux-india-help+raj+mathursourceid=mozilla-searchstart=0start=0ie=utf-8oe=utf-8client=firefoxrls=org.mozilla:en-US:unofficial
Simple example
--- Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check this as well:
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi
And how would anyone know about that if Google doesnt show the pages
from there ?
Try searching for mere paas ClusterKnoppix hai on google which should
show this page
- Forwarded message from Abhijit Menon-Sen [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Abhijit Menon-Sen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Oryx Mailstore 0.97
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 20:48:35 +0200 (CEST)
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 16:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But it always helps to have the other around. In fact the more others
the better it will get I hope
ram
Thanks Ram. At any rate, I am not interested in exchanging insults and
accusations.(It's not a woman's way, honestly ;-)) Those
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 15:55, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
On Monday, 22 Aug 2005 2:32 pm, Raj Mathur wrote:
Actually Raj, now that I have re-read it, I agree with Hassath that it is
*potentially* offensive to women. While it might be perceived as humorous to
men, it appears condescending to
At 2005-08-22 10:30:29 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing which we can very clearly disregard is the possibility
that the list is not interested.
Right.
Enough people are interested in solving the problem that rehashing the
argument will just give the disinclined more rope to waste
34 matches
Mail list logo
