PROTECTED] To:
ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org Subject: Re: [ilugd] Belenix coming in July Issue
of LFY The jive thread takes time to update. Here is the list archive
thread:
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/advocacy-discuss/2008-June/002735.html
Followed up on
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=64464tstart=0
[if anyone is still interested]
Angad Singh
http://blogs.sun.com/angad
___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
The jive thread takes time to update. Here is the list archive thread:
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/advocacy-discuss/2008-June/002735.html
___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
On 23-Jun-08, at 2:31 AM, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
Let me repeat - on the way there != already there.
actually the main point of the discussion has been whether advocacy
of opensolaris is to be permitted on this list. Obviously advocacy of
anything proprietary is a no no. So what is the
2008/6/23 Kenneth Gonsalves [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 23-Jun-08, at 2:31 AM, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
Let me repeat - on the way there != already there.
actually the main point of the discussion has been whether advocacy
of opensolaris is to be permitted on this list. Obviously advocacy of
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 2:31 AM, Sandip Bhattacharya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These are the facts as of now according to the official sources of
Opensolaris.
a) CDDL is an OSI approved licensed.
b) The majority of OpenSolaris code is released under CDDL
On Monday 23 Jun 2008, Vipul Mathur wrote:
[snip]
So let me get this straight:
(1) With Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora etc. I can install and run a 100%
FOSS system without needing any non-free binaries.
(2) For hardware etc that *requires* non-free binaries / blobs, I
have the option of *not
Hi all,
While I didn't want to get into the conversation, still anyways I
would like to share about what RMS did .
http://www.fsf.org/blogs/rms/can-we-rescue-olpc-from-windows
This might or might not be relevant with the issue at hand :)
--
Regards,
Shirish Agarwal
This email is licensed
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Raj Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 22 Jun 2008, Angad Singh wrote:
There's a difference between open source and FOSS as is evident
and has been talked about a lot in the above discussion.
Yes there is, and OpenSolaris is neither Open Source nor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
,--[ On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:39:14AM +0530, Sudhanwa Jogalekar wrote:
[snip]
| Probably, this is similar to Ubuntu which contains proprietory
| components for video and may be some other drivers. ( I am not Ubuntu
| user and can not comment on
+++ Sudhanwa Jogalekar [23/06/08 00:39 +0530]:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Raj Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 22 Jun 2008, Angad Singh wrote:
There's a difference between open source and FOSS as is evident
and has been talked about a lot in the above discussion.
Yes there is,
Please follow up the discussion on the advocacy-cg to get a better
answer (hope this is not against any rule):
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=64464tstart=0
Please take a note of this reply as well:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=64465tstart=0
On Saturday 21 Jun 2008, Angad Singh wrote:
Please follow up the discussion on the advocacy-cg to get a better
answer (hope this is not against any rule):
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=64464tstart=0
Please take a note of this reply as well:
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Raj Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 21 Jun 2008, Angad Singh wrote:
Please follow up the discussion on the advocacy-cg to get a better
answer (hope this is not against any rule):
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=64464tstart=0
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Raj Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 21 Jun 2008, Angad Singh wrote:
Please follow up the discussion on the advocacy-cg to get a better
answer (hope this is not against any rule):
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=64464tstart=0
On Saturday 21 Jun 2008, Angad Singh wrote:
[snip]
You did not tell me your views on this post:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=64465tstart=0
Let me quote it here: In my understanding the answer is no. Please
note that the Fedora, Ubuntu, OpenSuse, FreeBSD are not 100%
+++ Sudhanwa Jogalekar [21/06/08 15:43 +0530]:
Ubuntu also has some proprietory components but nobody says it is
NON-FOSS and is promoted and accepted very well everywhere.
Perhaps you did not completely understand what Raj said in the previous
mail - all the Linux distros mentioned (Ubuntu,
Firstly, let me remind you that the original discussion was whether
OpenSolaris is or not 'open source', since I had made that claim. I
never said it was FOSS. And that you're saying it is not FOSS is a
complete FUD tactic too. Secondly, the point remains that none of the
considered FOSS
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Sandip Bhattacharya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+++ Sudhanwa Jogalekar [21/06/08 15:43 +0530]:
Ubuntu also has some proprietory components but nobody says it is
NON-FOSS and is promoted and accepted very well everywhere.
Perhaps you did not completely understand
+++ Angad Singh [22/06/08 01:13 +0530]:
I agree. OpenSolaris, though being open source, is not FOSS, my point
is just that why shud it not be discussed on this list if other
non-FOSS distro's or other non-FOSS languages and much else is already
discussed.
Uh oh. Careful about your terminology:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 2:11 AM, Sandip Bhattacharya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+++ Angad Singh [22/06/08 01:13 +0530]:
I agree. OpenSolaris, though being open source, is not FOSS, my point
is just that why shud it not be discussed on this list if other
non-FOSS distro's or other non-FOSS
On Sunday 22 Jun 2008, Angad Singh wrote:
There's a difference between open source and FOSS as is evident
and has been talked about a lot in the above discussion.
Yes there is, and OpenSolaris is neither Open Source nor FOSS nor Free
Software as of today. Please stop misleading the list.
+++ Angad Singh [22/06/08 02:32 +0530]:
There's a difference between open source and FOSS as is evident
and has been talked about a lot in the above discussion.
No. There is no confusion about this in the list. FOSS definition
includes open source, and the whole discussion was whether
I'm not going to re-iterate anything just clearly mentioned in the
entire discussion. If you just want to stick to your own conclusion
even after it being proved wrong in the thread, then the list can
decide who misled who. I'm glad its all archived. FWIW, I repeat,
OpenSolaris is open source, its
: Re: [ilugd] Belenix coming in July Issue of LFY
+++ Angad Singh [22/06/08 02:32 +0530]:
There's a difference between open source and FOSS as is evident
and has been talked about a lot in the above discussion.
No. There is no confusion about this in the list. FOSS definition
includes open
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Sandip Bhattacharya [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+++ Angad Singh [18/06/08 12:17 +0530]:
Belenix is a LiveCD distribution of OpenSolaris created by the indian
opensolaris community - bangalore opensolaris user group (BOSUG).
Angad,
What is the current
On Friday 20 Jun 2008, Angad Singh wrote:
[snip]
OpenSolaris 2008.05 is 99% opensource except for a few drivers and
userland tools. In all these cases the code is derived from third
party sources and Sun does not own the rights to open these up. These
will eventually be replaced with open
+++ Angad Singh [18/06/08 12:17 +0530]:
Belenix is a LiveCD distribution of OpenSolaris created by the indian
opensolaris community - bangalore opensolaris user group (BOSUG).
Angad,
What is the current licensing state of Opensolaris? Is it entirely open
sourced?
This is from
28 matches
Mail list logo
