'
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Mark Crispin markrcris...@panda.com wrote:
mail_versioncheck() is in the c-client.a library (it's in mail.c) so you
should not be getting an undefined by referencing it. What is the EXACT
text of the error message?
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Marian Sorin Nasoi wrote:
I am
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Shawn Walker wrote:
I have a situation that I need to get a list of UIDs in a range but I have no
idea how many UIDs is
in that range. I can't just request all of the UIDs in a range since there
might be thousands of UIDs and I can't give the impression that the
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Joel Reicher wrote:
I run a small home mail server for my family. One of them uses a
Blackberry to access her email. In order to permit a burp to happen
from time-to-time, could I occasionally bring down uw-imap, physically
unplug my Ethernet, bring up uw-imap and wait a
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Dave Halsema wrote:
I can give a thumbs up to Mark's hack to allow burping when BlackBerry
devices are involved. It is working for us and we will be making
it available here soon. Thank you for your advice and help Mark,
it is much appreciated.
Contributions are always
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, David B Funk wrote:
FWIW, we see *.blackberry.net as well as *.blackberry.com IMAP
connections on our server.
Thanks for that information. I've updated my server to match
*.blackberry.net as well as *.blackberry.com
One of the hacks I've made to our UW-imap kit is to
Perhaps alarm() is not thread-safe in your C library?
The only thing that alarm() does is suspend alarms while it is in heap
management code (such as malloc() which is called by fs_get()). It's
basically a mutex around alarms. This is because the busy spinner in Pine
runs in an alarm
Your message indicates confusion on multiple points. The following
information ought to clear up your confusion AND answer your questions:
[1] There are three separate operations associated with the removal of a
message:
[a] Marking a message as deleted (deleting)
[b] Removing
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Haral Tsitsivas wrote:
However that still leaves me with the question: how do I burp this baby?
Burping happens automatically whenever the mailbox is opened exclusively
read-write.
An added complication may be that Blackberry polls the imap server for my
messages
This sounds like a problem that was fixed several months ago. Some
defective SMTP servers respond to a QUIT command by closing the connection
rather than issuing a proper response.
In general, two things will greatly simply the problem resolution process:
[1] Make sure that you are running a
, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Mark Crispin markrcris...@panda.comwrote:
Modern versions of c-client should build and run on 64-bit. I do so all
the time.
However, file sizes remain limited to 2GB; and basic numeric types (defined
by IMAP) remain 32-bit. Because IMAP is 32-bit, and the mix format makes
The first thing you should do is to determine which version of c-client
you have. Newer versions of c-client have a #define CCLIENTVERSION near
the start of mail.h. Your April 08 as the date confuses me; there was
no release version in April 2008 or on any April 8.
Please consider upgrading
be evaluated char *
Thanks,
-Raju
-Original Message-
From: m...@hsinghsing.panda.com [mailto:m...@hsinghsing.panda.com] On
Behalf Of Mark Crispin
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 3:57 PM
To: Raju Nanduri (rnanduri)
Cc: imap-uw@u.washington.edu; Patrick Hamel (path)
Subject: Re: [Imap-uw] C
The problem with using any command line parameters in the distribution
version of imapd is that certain obscure authentication mechanisms use the
command line for their own purposes. Fortunately, it's easy enough to
patch the source with the code that you want.
It's not likely that there
For many years, there have been various proposals to add mail sending
capabilities to mail access protocols such as POP and IMAP.
These proposals are always strongly opposed. It is one of the attractive
nuisances of email protocols. The value of the capability is obvious to
many people, but
Simple answer:
If you don't have socklen_t, the getsockname() function can take an int*,
long*, or size_t* depending upon system. The problem is that assuming any
of these three will cause a compile error if the system uses one of the
other two definitions and the two definitions don't both
I think that the key is that you are using traditional UNIX format for
your Drafts mailbox. This format does not allow multiple simultaneous
access; that is not required by IMAP but the authors of Thunderbird assume
otherwise.
The other player in this is UIDPLUS. UIDPLUS is another optional
That error message indicates that something appended to that that mbx
format mailbox in traditional UNIX mailbox format. The two formats are
incompatible with each other.
That something was not anything based upon my c-client library.
The solution is not to use whatever program did the dirty
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Aaron W. LaFramboise wrote:
There's probably a way to achieve this without PAM, but I'm not sure what it
is.
In my opinion, using PAM is the best way.
-- Mark --
http://panda.com/mrc
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
Liberty is a
As you discovered, you can't use mailutil this way. The arguments are
interpreted in the context of the calling user (root in your case), thus
the commend you give tries to create root's mbx-format INBOX and then copy
from root's current INBOX to the newly created root's mbx-format INBOX.
All
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, James H. McCullars wrote:
1.) Run mixcvt on everyone's (or a selected subset) INBOX
2.) Run mailutil create -u username ~username/INBOX (I have recompiled
imap-2007d with CREATEPROTO=mix) and let the users snarf up the messages next
time they check mail
Either way will
I tested this with mtest program shipped with c-client lib. This also
reports truncated body buffer if using mail_fetchtext(I am not
remembering the Command) while mail_fetch_message returned full mail
(including header)
This does not make sense. mail_fetch_message calls themail_fetchtext
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, James H. McCullars wrote:
Is there a way for the root user
to do this on behalf of a user?
Easiest way is to create one mbx or mix format INBOX that you keep as a
prototype, then copy it to the user's home directory. Be sure to change
ownership of the copy!
-- Mark --
It looks like Mulberry is confused by the CHILDREN extension.
Given that other clients don't work well without CHILDREN, your
best bet is to contact the author of Mulberry and ask him for
assistance in getting Mulberry fixed.
-- Mark --
http://panda.com/mrc
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep
- 2006g - (Mulberry works)
A00010 LIST a/a2/a3/%/%
* LIST () / a/a2/a3/a41
* LIST () / a/a2/a3/a42
A00010 OK LIST completed
If 2006g ever did this, this is definitely a bug. a/a2/a3/a41 can not
match a/a2/a3/%/%, although it could match a/a2/a3/%.
The correct response is
Please read the MIME specification. Your question indicates
to me that you have not read it. It is impossible to write a
quality email program without reading -- and understanding --
all the email specifications.
There are no shortcuts to doing the necessary research.
The text is question
The IMAP specification explicitly requires requires that a server NOT
remove a name from the subscription list even if the mailbox is
deleted. There is a separate step required to remove a name from
the subscription list.
Try to get Thunderbird to product a transcript of the IMAP protocol
For the record, all sites running Panda IMAP (imap-2008) have already
replaced the vulnerable version of dmail (they did not run tmail). I've
updated the panda.com/imap page to reflect that UW now has these
fixes in its imap-2007d.
The tmail bug is by far the more serious of the two.
joined the IMAP
effort, and the IMAP protocol would have languished in obscurity as
some crazy idea that Mark Crispin had decades ago that never took
off. IMAP would have had good company -- there were lots of really
good protocol ideas that ended up in the refuse heap of history for
being
I've long been surprised that UW hasn't substantially forked to date.
Forking imapd makes little sense compared to building your own. There
are many other open source IMAP servers.
Forks happen in larger projects, such as kernels, which are too daunting
to recreate from the ground up.
This is probably a bug with your IMAP server.
With NNTP, POP3, and all local file formats, mail_fetch_mime() simply
returns octets starting at point in the message text, where
and were earlier calculated by parsing the message.
With IMAP, mail_fetch_mime() does a specific IMAP operation to
Very few people run SCO systems, so it may be difficult to find someone
who knows enough about the issue to help you.
Your best bet is run run imapd as root under a debugger such as gdb,
with a breakpoint at routine checkpw() (in file ckp_sv4.c). Start imapd,
give the command x login username
I noticed this issue with gmail account.
I am not surprised. Gmail violates the IMAP specification in
many ways.
I am working with a product where we need to store the
mail in different parts in SQLite/MySQL and it should be
able to be able to recreate the mail as it is. I noticed this
Actually those settings seem to be part of the experimental things under the
Labs settings tab. You have to enable it there to have it show up at all, but
there are a lot of warnings and disclaimers about doing so.
I don't see any Labs setting tab. I assumed that he misspelled Labels.
There is a Labs tab under settings. I see it in my gmail settings.
And I don't.
_
Want to read Hotmail messages in Outlook? The Wordsmiths show you how.
You never know with Google. There is also an Older Version/Newer Version
toggle at the top by the Settings link, if you're in the older version you
won't have the Labs settings available.
I tried both older version and newer version. No joy.
We all hope you are doing well, though, in your
For what it's worth, this problem sounds to me like some underlying system
failure and not anything in imapd. A little system with a mere 60 users
should not get into this kind of trouble.
In addition to hardware issues, have you checked for other possibilities, such
as a denial of service
- we currently have no quotas (you read that right) on disk usage and
despite warnings from I.T., many users' Inboxes had grown to between 400
and 600MB. Sent and Trash folders for several users 1GB. Some users
have as many as 300 imap folders, so while there are just 60 users,
we're hitting
Hi Steve -
Hope you're doing OK in spite of everything going on.
There was a patch to tmail.c itself, along with some patches to the
c-client library. I forget if those patches were important for tmail or
just imapd.
At least one of the imapd patches is important; it makes the
.BounceMail
mtest is a suitable example program to use for an initial start. mailutil and
imapd are more advanced example programs; Alpine is an even more advanced one.
You should make sure that you can build mtest, because if you can't built mtest
you can't build anything else.
The
Decades of unhappy experience proves that whatever time is saved, and
convenience gained, by the use of non-FQDN names is vastly outweighed by the
problems created.
-- Mark --
http://panda.com/mrc
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed
According the RFC822/RFC2822 then local part of email address is
case-sensive, with exception of 'postmaster' which shall be compared
insensitive.
I helped write that text. I know what it means.
Yes, sendmail does case-independent matching, but it's proprietary
extension. No program shall
speaking of features that cause problems, the feature of uw-imap that will
let users login as User or USER or user bites me on a regular basis. we
use squirrelmail and have some plugins that do vacation/procmail setup and
it uses ftp to do that, so if they log in as User, then the ftp doesn't
Actually sendmail does configurable case squashing of user-ids, with the
default of case squashing enabled. (In otherwords 'Joe' 'JOE' and 'joe'
all get converted to 'joe' before any delivery processing is done,
unless you add the 'u' mailer flag to preserve case).
imapd does something
Two other people reported the same issue. I suspect that the problem
is the unguarded fs_give().
Try the attached more detailed patch, which is what I actually did as
opposed to what I typed in off-hand into Hotmail. It replaces the
existing IDLE code in imapd.c; delete the old code and drop
The right way is to use tmail and/or dmail for delivery.
I regret ever putting in code into mbx format that accounts for the spool
in STATUS. My punishment for this ill-considered effort to be helpful was
bug reports from individuals who were upset that spool messages did
not show up in EXAMINE
Used to work until very recently. The user can no longer get email from
her RIM Blackberry. Here is a trace of the failing session. I have no
clue what the problem is. Any suggestions?
01:23:49 2 select INBOX
01:23:49 * 0 EXISTS
01:23:49 * 0 RECENT
01:23:49 * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1157559673]
It's a restriction, and it's permanent.
Snarfing requires RW access, and EXAMINE by definition is RO.
Use STATUS or EXAMINE, but don't use both.
-- Mark --
http://panda.com/mrc
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the
Yes, you can define your own flags. The flag is created the first time
it is set in a message.
-- Mark --
http://panda.com/mrc
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.
To: imap-uw@u.washington.edu
Date: Tue, 19
() is returning 4294967295 in this case.
The max value, I guess, instead of the min. Thanks again.
Mark Crispin wrote:
It's a bug in the IMAP server. It is sending a literal (a type of string)
with
a size count of -1. The size count for a literal is an unsigned, non-zero,
32-bit value.
I
Thank you. Your proposed patch is correct, and is now in Panda IMAP.
For what it's worth, there may be some news about a public distribution
of Panda IMAP later this month.
-- Mark --
http://panda.com/mrc
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
Liberty is a
Are you back to maintain c-client?
I maintain c-client for my own purposes, but I am no longer in the business of
developing or maintaining it for others.
But, after digging around the code, I found out a previous developer never
finished the code to
decode rfc2047. I have just completed
Thanks for letting me know. It makes me feel a lot better. I went to
considerable effort to get Solaris (and other SVR4) systems to work, in spite
of the serious design misfeature of POSIX locking (which, sadly, is all that
SVR4 has).
-- Mark --
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:29:28 -0400
I started that port several years ago, back in Windows CE 1.0 days, but
never finished it.
As I recall, the WCE SDK excludes most of the traditional CRT functions;
e.g., you are expected to use the wchar functions instead of the
traditional char functions such as strcpy(), etc.
So, you'll
On Mon, 19 May 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From what I can tell it seems to be down to the app to walk the results and
make a count.
That's one way. What is returned is a 0-terminated array.
for (i = 0; sort_result[i] 0; i++)
Note that message numbers are unsigned, so test for
On Sun, 18 May 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Current issue: mail_sort works as expected, consistently, with one exception.
Any search program (spg) passed to it seems to be completely ignored. I've
tried many different approaches for the last 48 hours and nothing has worked,
so I'm curious if
Tom -
You aren't missing anything. restrictBox is implemented in a very
paranoid fashion, and almost certainly can be relaxed safely.
In designing the distribution rules for restrictBox, I didn't go by what
is unsafe; I went by what might under some set of circumstances (that I
don't
Newline handling on Windows was a long-time hair-puller for me.
As we all know, the Windows standard for newline is CRLF (and IMHO that is
the correct one). Some Windows applications do not work at all well with
bare-LF line terminator text files.
15 years ago, I was forced to make the
First, you should upgrade from 2006j to 2007a immediately. 2006j was an
intermediate version.
The only temporary files are small (a few bytes) files on /tmp used to aid
in locking.
Assuming that you are using the traditional UNIX mailbox format, note that
imap-2006 implemented UIDPLUS
It would probably be more useful if you set OP_DEBUG in your mail_open()
calls and collect the mm_dlog() events; this will show a protocol
telemetry of what the server is actually doing.
With that in mind, I agree that this seems to be bad behavior on the part
of the server and your surmises
On Thu, 1 May 2008, Ken Keating wrote:
How did you do this? Did you change IMAPSSLPORT in imap4r1.c from 993
to 994 (the most straightforward way)? Or did you use some other
means? If so, what?
We didn't change IMAPSSLPORT. We're running Solaris 10 and controlling
this through inetd:
Hmm.
A couple of notes:
There is no reason to believe that a STATUS command in any way reflects
what is going on with the selected mailbox stream, even if the mailboxes
are the same. So, although interesting, the STATUS results are actually
inconclusive.
Next:
My first hunch looking at the
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008, simon haywood wrote:
Apr 27 21:12:41 Arthur imapd[1507]: imaps SSL service init from 192.168.178.29
Apr 27 21:12:42 Arthur imapd[1507]: Command stream end of file, while reading
line user=??? host=book [192.168.178.29]
Please remember, this log message only means that
On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, Ken Keating wrote:
For testing purposes we built 2007a to accept secure connections on port 994
rather than 993.
How did you do this? Did you change IMAPSSLPORT in imap4r1.c from 993 to
994 (the most straightforward way)? Or did you use some other means? If
so, what?
This is my opinion only:
I believe that a software implementation on a general-purpose processor
will always have superior price/performance to a special-purpose
processor; and furthermore that the performance (as opposed to
price/performance) of a software implementation on a general-purpose
What version of mailutil are you running? If you are not running the
latest version, try the latest version.
Why are you using mx format? mx is utterly unsupported and has been in
that state of non-support for 10 years. If you want a dual-use mailbox
format, you should use mix which is
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Brett Randall wrote:
What do you know... The latest version works perfectly. Can't believe Debian
Etch ships with such an old piece of software!
Cool. Thanks for the update!
At least Debian is in the 21st century. I still hear from people running
code from the mid
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Joel Reicher wrote:
OK, but why leave the child status indeterminate? Presumably imapd always
knows which mailbox INBOX really refers to.
It's indeterminate because any case string matches INBOX, but when
children are involved an exact case is required. INBOX matches
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Joel Reicher wrote:
If I am sure none of my
users will work around the server to create a child of INBOX is there
anything wrong with imapd reporting \NoInferiors for INBOX unconditionally?
I can see the code in dummy_scan() for this.
Yes. Just pull that code that tests
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Esh, Thomas D (Tom) wrote:
Interesting, my interpretation of the spec is that
only the inbox part is case-insensitive.
The other parts of the mailbox name are still case-sensitive.
That is *a* interpretation of the specification. There are other, equally
valid,
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Michael Cashwell wrote:
I must be being dense here, but isn't having an inferior to INBOX named
identically but with only case differences a very special case? Wouldn't it
make more sense to prohibit only that similar to how a case-preserving but
case-insensitive file
This thread is closed.
-- Mark --
http://panda.com/mrc
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.
___
Imap-uw mailing list
Imap-uw@u.washington.edu
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, Mark Crispin wrote:
By request, there is explicit code in UW imapd (dummy_scan() in dummy.c) to
list INBOX, and not report \NoInferiors if the INBOX is in a dual-use format.
But it's still not supported.
To clarify further, imapd used to report \NoInferiors for INBOX
Although the behavior seems strange and is arguably wrong, it is compliant
with the IMAP protocol specification and is brought about by how INBOX is
implemented in UW imapd.
If neither \HasChildren or \HasNoChildren is indicated, then the child
status is indeterminate. The lack of
In mbx format, there is always a read lock on the mbx mailbox.
If I'm interpreting this output correctly, process 518 is stuck and
sitting on the write lock for the file in question (what format is
/home/myuser/Mail/Trash ?) and that causes the bottleneck.
Also, what version are you running?
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Ken Mandelberg wrote:
Should there be a problem with imapd serving an mbx INBOX, with other folders
in traditional file format? Some of our users with that setup report hangs
trying to move mail from their INBOX to a folder.
There should be no problem. UW imapd looks at
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Oscar del Rio wrote:
A limitation of that feature is that the saved message (without the
attachments)
is appended to the mailbox. If you sort your mail by Mailbox Order (or Order
Received) the old message shows up at the end, with the newer messages.
That is unavoidable.
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, Dister Kemp wrote:
I was wondering if IMAP server (the protocol) supports selective
mailpart deletion instead of deleting the entire message.
No. Messages are static. The only way to delete a part of a message is
to make a new copy of the message with the desired
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, Tom Leach wrote:
Mark, I didn't mention this before, but I had already changed the CREATEPROTO
to mixproto (but I left EMPTYPROTO as unixproto).
If that is the case, then tmail behaves as follows:
1) If there is a ~/INBOX mix-format mailbox, it delivers there.
2)
First things first: dmail vs. tmail.
tmail must be run as root; the program is designed to be invoked from a
process whose UID is not the destination user, and thus it needs root in
order to be able to setuid to the user and complete delivery.
If the delivery program is run as the
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Gary Casterline wrote:
I'm keen on this thread. Not much help to offer, but a question that seems
to fit -- Has anyone tried to use a postfix 'per-user' delivery agent to test
deployment of mix format INBOX to a few folks at a time? If I could figure
out a way to do a
I would say use tmail. The cost in snarfing from traditional UNIX to
mix format is almost certainly worse.
Don't forget that there is plenty of locking necessary with traditional
UNIX mbox format.
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Tom Leach wrote:
I'm planning the migration from our current mail setup
Are you certain that the mailbox is mbx format, as opposed to traditional
UNIX (a.k.a. mbox) format?
If the mailbox is truly mbx format, then there is no reason at the server
side why Thunderbird should be behaving this way.
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Ken Mandelberg wrote:
One of our users has
On Sun, 6 Apr 2008, David Carter wrote:
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Joel Reicher wrote:
My preferred webmail client, prayer, reports mix-format mailboxes strictly
as directories, and gives no way to access the mail in them.
FWIW, I'm about to release a new version of Prayer which handles dual use
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, simon haywood wrote:
Can you be more specific? Are you saying that new mail arrived, but that
even after waiting a minute or more you never say it?
Exactly.
Mail is sent. Postfix deals with it. Then nothing happens.
The logs of the mail client indicate that Idle mode is
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, simon haywood wrote:
1. That emails will (should?) arrive to be read in my email client as soon
as they are sent - not after the next timed poll.
That assumes that there is infrastructure between the delivery system and
the IMAP server to accomplish that. That is not a
I've studied your problems with considerable concern, and I must admit to
being completely stymied. I have never seen this problem, and you are the
only site that has reported it. Another site has reported a different
class of problem on Solaris, which may have a common cause (see below)
I'm confused. What do you expect to happen?
IDLE is not something that end users would normally see any difference.
The only visible change is that a mobile phone would need to transmit a
little bit less -- assuming that there is no NAT between the mobile phone
and the server.
I see no
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008, David Severance wrote:
I didn't see an announcement but apparently there have been two releases
since the announcement of 2007 some time ago. Was there a new version
announced but I missed it?
What's in the new version? Soft quota support?
It's just a maintenance update
Once upon a time, before I had SSPI code, I built the c-client on Windows
using OpenSSL.
However, since c-client supports SSPI on Windows, and all but the very
most ancient versions of Windows have SSPI built in as part of the
operating system, it is pointless today to build Windows c-client
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Jason Mitchell wrote:
I wondered if it would be at all possible to configure an imap account in
Outlook 2007 to have a calendar that could then be shared etc.
The IMAP protocol does not have any calendaring capabilities; IMAP is a
message access protocol and not a
]
On Behalf Of Mark Crispin
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 6:26 PM
To: Alla Bogolubov
Cc: imap-uw@u.washington.edu
Subject: RE: email format and attachment
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Alla Bogolubov wrote:
Is it possible to send email in HTTP format with c-client?
Is it possible to attach to the email?
Yes
Unfortunately, problems such as these are almost invariably network
related and have little/nothing to do with IMAP.
Once logged in, the only timeout in IMAP is a 30 minute inactivity
autologout timer.
One of the biggest offenders is NAT. Many NAT devices drop the mapping if
there has not
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Alla Bogolubov wrote:
1) Where can I find full documentation on c-client functions?
Source code. Most functions have headers describing their arguments and
return values.
2) Are there any POP3 client examples available?
Not from me. Maybe someone else has something
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Alla Bogolubov wrote:
Please advise where I went wrong.
Your mail() function is missing the mandatory statement
#include linkage.c
Without that statement, the c-client library is not properly initialized.
-- Mark --
http://panda.com/mrc
Democracy is two wolves and a
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Mark Crispin wrote:
Your mail() function is missing the mandatory statement
^^
Sorry, I meant to type Your main() function.
Every application that uses c-client must have the
#include linkage.c
statement, early in its main() function.
-- Mark --
http
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Bob Atkins wrote:
I also was bitten by this include file. Is there some reason that you didn't
put this stuff on linkage.h?
linkage.c is code, not definitions. It does such tasks as driver and
authenticator linkage, application/API version match verification, etc.
This
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Alla Bogolubov wrote:
Is it possible to send email in HTTP format with c-client?
Is it possible to attach to the email?
Yes. The mechanism by which you send MIME messages is complex. You
should look at the source to an existing program, such as Pine, Alpine, or
my old
First and foremost, you should upgrade from 2006j. The current release
version is (always) on:
ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/mail/imap.tar.Z
Next, when you do your TELNET test, do you see an imapd process on your
system? If you do not see an imapd process, then something is wrong with
What you describe seems to be a good indication that it isn't an imapd
issue, but rather some inetd issue. The fact that inetd answers the port
seems to indicate that it is having trouble invoking imapd.
Since this isn't an imapd issue, you'll probably be better off getting a
local UNIX
On Sun, 9 Mar 2008, Tom Grove wrote:
Are there any major changes between 2006 and 2007 from a compilation
perspective? Libraries that it needs or anything like that? Thanks.
No change from a compilation perspective. Just better.
-- Mark --
http://panda.com/mrc
Democracy is two wolves and
101 - 200 of 1002 matches
Mail list logo
