s Exp $
*/
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
*
* @author Juha Lindfors ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* @author Jay Walters ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- * @version $Revision: 1.17 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.17.2.1 $
* @sinceJDK 1.3
*/
public class EJBVerifier20 extends AbstractVer
/04/14 01:12:05 jwalters Exp $
+ * $Id: EJBVerifier20.java,v 1.17 2002/04/14 12:00:07 jwalters Exp $
*/
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
*
* @author Juha Lindfors ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* @author Jay Walters ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- * @version $Revision: 1.16 $
+ * @version
User: jwalters
Date: 02/04/13 18:12:05
Modified:src/resources/org/jboss/verifier DefaultMessages.properties
Log:
Entity bean verification is working a bit better, it's now all turned on.
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +2 -4
jboss/src/resources/org/jboss/verifier/De
s.org
- * $Id: EJBVerifier20.java,v 1.15 2002/04/12 03:38:32 jwalters Exp $
+ * $Id: EJBVerifier20.java,v 1.16 2002/04/14 01:12:05 jwalters Exp $
*/
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
*
* @author Juha Lindfors ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* @author Jay Walters ([EMAIL PROT
User: jwalters
Date: 02/04/11 20:38:34
Modified:src/resources/org/jboss/verifier DefaultMessages.properties
Log:
Entity home and local home interface are now working, rest of
entity verification is still commented out pending some test.
Revision ChangesPath
1.13 +
])
* @author Jay Walters ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- * @version $Revision: 1.14 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.15 $
* @sinceJDK 1.3
*/
public class EJBVerifier20 extends AbstractVerifier {
@@ -110,8 +110,6 @@
public void checkEntity(EntityMetaData entity)
{
boolean
- * $Id: EJBVerifier20.java,v 1.13 2002/04/09 04:27:25 jwalters Exp $
+ * $Id: EJBVerifier20.java,v 1.14 2002/04/11 10:17:42 jwalters Exp $
*/
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
*
* @author Juha Lindfors ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* @author Jay Walters ([EMAIL PROTECTED
The EJB 2.0 verifier is in process. Next time I work on it I'll try to
remove all the code generating spurious messages. Many things have
changed between EJB 1.1 and EJB 2.0, and I didn't catch them all in the
process of moving the code over.
Cheers
Dave Smith wrote:
> I am getting these e
User: jwalters
Date: 02/04/08 21:27:25
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/ejbconf/beans/ejb ReadOnlyBean.java
Log:
Managed to checkin and break the testsuite... runs properly on my machine now.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +1 -2
jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/ej
User: jwalters
Date: 02/04/08 21:27:25
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/cmp2/readonly BookBean.java
PublisherBean.java
Log:
Managed to checkin and break the testsuite... runs properly on my machine now.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +1 -0 jb
www.jboss.org
- * $Id: EJBVerifier20.java,v 1.12 2002/04/09 04:06:37 jwalters Exp $
+ * $Id: EJBVerifier20.java,v 1.13 2002/04/09 04:27:25 jwalters Exp $
*/
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
*
* @author Juha Lindfors ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* @author Jay Walters ([EMAIL PROTECTED
User: jwalters
Date: 02/04/08 21:06:38
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/cmp2/readonly BookBean.java
PublisherBean.java
Log:
Updated verifier to do simple entity bean verification for EJB 2.0.
Updated some of the tests so the beans are in compliance with EJB
User: jwalters
Date: 02/04/08 21:06:38
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/cmp2/ejbselect ABean.java BBean.java
Log:
Updated verifier to do simple entity bean verification for EJB 2.0.
Updated some of the tests so the beans are in compliance with EJB 2.0.
Revision ChangesPa
$Id: EJBVerifier20.java,v 1.11 2002/04/08 02:35:01 jwalters Exp $
+ * $Id: EJBVerifier20.java,v 1.12 2002/04/09 04:06:37 jwalters Exp $
*/
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
*
* @author Juha Lindfors ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* @author Jay Walters ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- * @versio
User: jwalters
Date: 02/04/08 21:06:39
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/ejbconf/beans/ejb ReadOnlyBean.java
Log:
Updated verifier to do simple entity bean verification for EJB 2.0.
Updated some of the tests so the beans are in compliance with EJB 2.0.
Revision ChangesPat
User: jwalters
Date: 02/04/08 21:06:38
Modified:src/resources/org/jboss/verifier DefaultMessages.properties
Log:
Updated verifier to do simple entity bean verification for EJB 2.0.
Updated some of the tests so the beans are in compliance with EJB 2.0.
Revision ChangesPat
User: jwalters
Date: 02/04/07 19:35:02
Modified:src/resources/org/jboss/verifier DefaultMessages.properties
Log:
First pass at EJB 2.0 Verifier. Handles session beans, though not all
messages are in the properties file yet. Most entity bean code is in,
but not turned on until
Sorry to post this to dev, but what is the RMI port listed under the Naming
MBean? Does JBoss have an RMI registry? We are trying to deploy some
simple RMI objects as MBeans for management purposes and we're wondering if
we can avoid the use of JNDI or not?
Are there any issues with using JM
Is anybody working on this? It seems to just be stubs in the head right
now.
Cheers
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: jwalters
Date: 02/03/12 21:13:20
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb StatelessSessionContainer.java
Log:
Added patch 520631 which puts the missing method into the exception message.
Revision ChangesPath
1.34 +26 -2 jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/StatelessSession
User: jwalters
Date: 02/02/04 19:30:14
Modified:src/xdocs/howto howtonetbeansdebug.xml
Log:
Updated to JBoss 2.4 (somehow previous update was lost).
Revision ChangesPath
3.2 +30 -28manual/src/xdocs/howto/howtonetbeansdebug.xml
Index: howtonetbeansdebug.xml
--- howtonetbeansdebug.xml2001/11/18 19:14:34 2.0
+++ howtonetbeansdebug.xml2001/12/08 04:02:52 2.0.4.1
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
Jay
Walters
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Purpose
3.1
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
Jay
Walters
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Purpose
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED
User: jwalters
Date: 01/10/02 19:09:06
Modified:src/main/javax/resource/cci Connection.java
Log:
Updated Connection interface to match 1.0 spec (removed get/setAutoCommit).
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +0 -10 jboss-j2ee/src/main/javax/resource/cci/Connection.java
If you use copy on write of the MBeans (and on the list of MBeans - the
stack) then you can probably do everything needed. Of course this raises
questions about what is the impact of multiple versions of a specific MBean
is, but these are supposed to be stateless interceptor-like MBeans right, so
Definitely a much simpler idea to just build the new stack and replace the
old one atomically than to try and build a database for the MBeans.
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Rickard Öberg
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10/2/01 12:33 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JMX service architecture: nex
NetBeans appears to have quite a rich interface after a quick read of the
link you provided. But it's an IDE so it has a need for all of that.
How rich an interface does JBoss need, I have been just sort of following
the emails and not thinking too hard. Did this need start with a desire to
loa
Another problem is getting the ordering right, it is not a simple problem to
write the SQL to get the correct next row for every database for arbitrary
queries, but for a fixed query in a finder this might not be so much of an
obstacle. Also during the intervening time other transactions could ch
It was me. It sure helped to start the server up before I ran the tests the
second time! Sorry to post first and troubleshoot second...
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Jay Walters
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: 9/21/01 10:17 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Tests and new build suite
Sorry to post this on the list but I can't get to the site to read
instructions... First let me say the new build process is very nice (I've
avoided it during it's teething pains!) How does one run the test suite? I
tried "build test" in the test directory but they all keep failing with what
lo
they
fix them :)
http://sdt.cern.ch/Objecteering/
http://www.softeam.fr/us/pser_telechargement.htm
> -Mensaje original-
> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Jay
> Walters
> Enviado el: viernes, 21 de septiembre de 2001 1:05
> Para: '[EMA
Objecteering personal edition is another lowend UML modeller I've used for
sometime. It only runs on Windoze, and oddly enough 12 years after the
WIndows look and feel guidelines it has a very unique UI. It is stableand
free however.
Argo/UML and Poseidon (from same code base) are both good Jav
Looks like port 5000 from your command, but check the how-to for debugging
jboss with netbeans and there should be some info there on the setup of the
jvm...
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Colin Daly
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 8/30/01 8:47 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] remote debugging from
I would think you would want to use the EXISTS operator for the reason you
specified - portability - as well as I believe that vendors often optimize
it somewhat for performance.
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 4:32
--Original Message-
From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 3:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JDBC SQL Extensions
consice does not equal understandable
for example
a?b:c
-dain
- Original Message -----
From: "Jay Walters&quo
Not to be too much in oracle's defense, but their proprietary outer join
syntax is much more concise. I think you will need to do mapping onto the
various vendor's syntax...
-Original Message-
From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 3:11 PM
To: [EMAI
If you have a foreign key on the field which is in the parent table and you
do not have an index on the field in the parent table (naughty naughty) then
it will lock the entire parent table whenever it needs to check the
referential integrity constraint.
The fix is to index all fields which are r
User: jwalters
Date: 01/08/06 20:24:34
Modified:src/docs Tag: Branch_2_4 howtonetbeansdebug.xml
Log:
Updated list of jar files to 2.4 - jboss-j2ee,jboss-jdbc_ext.jar.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
1.2.2.1
Oops - sounds like an oversite on (perhaps my part). These jar files just
go too many places and it's all by hand.
I'm several days behind in my e-mail has anybody fixed this since it was
posted? I think there might also be some issues with the JBossCX versions
of the j2ee jar files.
Cheers
-
Did you make this change to the mainline as well?
-Original Message-
From: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 7:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss.jcml reading properties problem/bug.
Throwing away the new lines is not correct
I'm not sure what dependencies there might be between the latest
jbosspool,jbosscx, jboss-j2ee and jboss mainline changes I made and you guys
pushing a new jbosspool into 2.4. Ok, actually I'm worried something will
be fouled up because of the dependencies between the various bits and pieces
I to
Do I need an MBean for each connector which I'm deploying to JBossCX (maybe
I'm really confused here)? It seems that this is how the two which are
distributed with the standard JBoss release are configured. Is this how it
works right now? Is there some reason that it needs to be this way?
Cheer
ector MBean Config seems
off
Bugs item #442479, was opened at 2001-07-18 09:48
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=442479&group_id=
22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v2.5 Rabbit Hole (unstable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/18 07:40:15
Modified:src/resources/org/jboss/metadata connector_1_0.dtd
Log:
Completed update of jbosscx to Connector 1.0 pfd2 spec.
Thanks to Thomasz Skutnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the patches
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +13 -13jbos
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/18 07:40:14
Modified:src/lib jbosscx.jar jbosspool.jar
Log:
Completed update of jbosscx to Connector 1.0 pfd2 spec.
Thanks to Thomasz Skutnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the patches
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +36 -29jboss/src/lib/jbossc
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/18 07:40:13
Modified:src/etc/deploy jbosspool-jdbc.rar
Log:
Completed update of jbosscx to Connector 1.0 pfd2 spec.
Thanks to Thomasz Skutnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the patches
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +40 -50jboss/src/etc/deploy/
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/18 07:40:14
Modified:src/resources/org/jboss/jms/ra/META-INF ra.xml
Log:
Completed update of jbosscx to Connector 1.0 pfd2 spec.
Thanks to Thomasz Skutnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the patches
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +3 -3 jboss/sr
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/18 07:38:23
Modified:src/resources/jdbc-rar/META-INF ra.xml
Log:
Completed update of jbosscx to Connector 1.0 pfd2
Thanks to Thomasz Skutnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the patches.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +3 -3 jbosspool/src/resourc
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/18 07:36:05
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/resource/security
ManyToOnePrincipalMapping.java
Log:
Completed update to pfd2, more changes to DTD.
Thanks to Tomasz Skutnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the patches.
Revision Changes
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/18 07:36:05
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/resource RARMetaData.java
Log:
Completed update to pfd2, more changes to DTD.
Thanks to Tomasz Skutnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the patches.
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +3 -3 jbosscx/src/main/or
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/18 07:38:23
Modified:lib jbosscx.jar
Log:
Completed update of jbosscx to Connector 1.0 pfd2
Thanks to Thomasz Skutnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the patches.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +36 -29jbosspool/lib/jbosscx.jar
<>
Sorry, should have said started us down the road to pfd2. I did enough to
get the j2ee tutorial connector working.
I've taken these three patches and I'll apply them to CVS. Thanks for your
work...
-Original Message-
From: Tomasz Skutnik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/17 20:20:58
Modified:src/lib jboss-j2ee.jar jboss-jdbc_ext.jar
Log:
Updated j2ee jar files for connector pfd2
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +126 -126 jbosstest/src/lib/jboss-j2ee.jar
<>
1.3 +17 -17jbosstest/src/l
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/17 20:10:09
Modified:src/client jboss-j2ee.jar
Log:
Updated jboss-j2ee.jar in the client directory as well
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +126 -126 jboss/src/client/jboss-j2ee.jar
<>
__
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/17 20:04:47
Modified:src/lib jboss-j2ee.jar jboss-jdbc_ext.jar
Log:
Updated j2ee jar files with latest connector pfd2
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +126 -126 jbossmq/src/lib/jboss-j2ee.jar
<>
1.4 +17 -17jbossmq/s
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/17 20:01:52
Modified:src/lib jbosscx.jar jbosspool.jar
Log:
Updated Connector related jar/rar files to pfd2 transaction-supports
element in the deployment descriptor.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +60 -123 jboss/src/lib/jbosscx.jar
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/17 20:01:52
Modified:src/etc/deploy jbosspool-jdbc.rar
Log:
Updated Connector related jar/rar files to pfd2 transaction-supports
element in the deployment descriptor.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +57 -59jboss/src/etc/deploy/jbosspool-jd
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/17 20:01:52
Modified:src/resources/org/jboss/jms/ra/META-INF ra.xml
Log:
Updated Connector related jar/rar files to pfd2 transaction-supports
element in the deployment descriptor.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +2 -2 jboss/src/resources/
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/17 19:53:51
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/resource RARMetaData.java
Log:
Updated error message if bad transaction-support element supplied in
RAR deployment descriptor.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +4 -4 jbosscx/src/main/org/jboss/resour
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/17 19:52:39
Modified:lib jbosscx.jar
Log:
Updated rar deployment descriptor to PFD2 transaction-support element,
and jbosscx.jar to have proper error message if bad transaction-suppport
element supplied by RAR developer.
Revision Changes
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/17 19:52:40
Modified:src/resources/jdbc-rar/META-INF ra.xml
Log:
Updated rar deployment descriptor to PFD2 transaction-support element,
and jbosscx.jar to have proper error message if bad transaction-suppport
element supplied by RAR developer.
Rev
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/17 19:29:44
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/resource RARMetaData.java
Log:
DTD change for transaction-support element for pfd2
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +4 -4 jbosscx/src/main/org/jboss/resource/RARMetaData.java
Index: RARMetaData.ja
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/17 19:12:22
Modified:lib jboss-j2ee.jar jboss-jdbc_ext.jar
Log:
Updated j2ee jar files for connector pfd2
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +126 -126 jbosspool/lib/jboss-j2ee.jar
<>
1.3 +17 -17jbosspool/lib/jboss
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/17 19:09:33
Modified:src/lib jboss-j2ee.jar
Log:
Updated jboss-j2ee.jar file to Connector PFD2.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +126 -126 jbosscx/src/lib/jboss-j2ee.jar
<>
___
Jboss
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/17 19:05:12
Modified:src/main/javax/resource/cci ConnectionFactory.java
Log:
Removed methods from ConnectionFactory which were removed in the PFD2 doc.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +0 -28 jboss-j2ee/src/main/javax/resource/cci/ConnectionF
How about whacking him on the head! By the way maybe until then we can
avoid using more than 2 ! or x/X characters in the subject of any e-mails.
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 3:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
I have done a lot of work generating EJBs from UML models, I am willing to
share what I've learned if you are interested.
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Brian Gilman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 3:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Reverse CMP?
It isn't working for me either... I get an ssh error
-Original Message-
From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 11:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Hell---o RE: [JBoss-dev] cvs down this morning?
anyone out there?
I am alone on this planet...??
They are all case sensitive when it comes to the data...
-Original Message-
From: Vinay Menon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 8:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-438115 ] JAWS lower-cases custom
finder SQL text
Dan,
Oracle case
The bean developer uses the home/remote interfaces, Dain is building the
plumbing that makes it transparent to the bean developer. For example if
the bean developer adds an object to a 1:n CMR under the covers the
container/persistence manager/CMP beans need to get data into the bean and
the data
jects (cache, invoker etc); JBossCMP was executed
by the container via the persistence store interface. I'm going to have to
think about this.
Thanks for helping to clarify my bad feeling,
-dain
> -----Original Message-
> From: Jay Walters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Frid
I would think you'd want to be out of the guts too, that just seems a bit
too closely coupled with JBoss for the persistence manager. Shouldn't the
CMP persistence manager be some type of layer on top (well almost on top)
with a well defined interface? This should clearly tie in to take advantag
ople of our community when it comes to commercial
> databases like oracle, informix, etc (maybe payed?).
>
> thanks and have fun, CC
>
> --- Jay Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My understanding of firebird is that it's a fraction
> > of the entire
y, June 28, 2001 1:36 PM -0400 Jay Walters
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In order to listen on port 80 with tomcat does one need to run Jboss
as
> root? Does this present a security hazard - does Tomcat have any odd
> backdoors. Is jetty any different?
>
> Cheers
> Jay
>
In order to listen on port 80 with tomcat does one need to run Jboss as
root? Does this present a security hazard - does Tomcat have any odd
backdoors. Is jetty any different?
Cheers
Jay
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lis
My understanding of firebird is that it's a fraction of the entire interbase
product missing many important features and tools. (though it has XA
support?)
On another note, I agree that Postgres is the only other open source
database with XA support. I spent a bunch of time poking around open s
I think the pool hands out connections associated with a transaction,
doesn't it? Unless JAWS uses a different API than everybody else does, then
you can't set the isolation level in JAWS, it has to be done by the pooling
software prior to assigning the connection to a transaction. If JAWS set
t
That is standard locking, you should see that everywhere unless you can set
some bit to not wait for locks and just abort the statement. SQL*Plus and
JDBC both look the same to the server.
Of course with Oracle it won't block readers, with some other databases you
will block readers in the secon
:35 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: The next generation GUI (was : Re: [JBoss-dev] EJX and XML)
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Jay Walters wrote:
> I don't edit my xml by hand or by tool, I generate it!
That's not always realistic. It works great if you're wri
Original Message-
From: Peter Fagerlund [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 10:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The next generation GUI (was : Re: [JBoss-dev] EJX and XML)
on 1-06-26 15.13, Jay Walters at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You guys wouldn't want to
I don't edit my xml by hand or by tool, I generate it!
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Mulder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 10:14 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: The next generation GUI (was : Re: [JBoss-dev] EJX and XML)
On Tue, 2
#x27;t edit
xml they shouldn't be configuring the server or ejb-jar.
-dain
- Original Message -
From: "Jay Walters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 2:42 PM
Subject: RE: The next generation GUI (was : Re: [JBoss-dev] E
netbeans is another possibility...
-Original Message-
From: Peter Fagerlund [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 3:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The next generation GUI (was : Re: [JBoss-dev] EJX and XML)
on 1-06-25 19.30, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ignore me - I went onto jboss-user over the weekend and all the traffic left
me a bit dizzy
It is great to see so much traffic over there though.
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Jay Walters
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: 6/25/01 8:15 AM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] finder op
What if I've got CMP and BMP beans mixed...
-Original Message-
From: danch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 12:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] finder optimization(read-ahead) phase 3
Bill Burke wrote:
>
>>
>
>
> Can you explain this again
Ah, the real bug shows it's ugly head. We'll get that one!
Thanks Scott.
-Original Message-
From: Scott M Stark
To: JBoss Dev
Sent: 6/21/01 8:36 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] lib/jboss-j2ee.jar vs. client/jboss-j2ee.jar
This was an effort initiated by Marc due to some legal concerns. You'
These are in theory complete re-implementations of the spec, clearly not the
best - hey I did some of them myself.
Marc and the board asked for this so that we could avoid any issues about
distributing the sun jarfiles (some have licenses that don't allow people
like jboss.org to distribute them)
RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-434227 ] ejbStore delay can lead
toDB corruption
Duh!Soyy
You could probably do the same with CMP/JAWS, correct?
bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jay
> Walters
> Sent: Tuesd
t: Re: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-434227 ] ejbStore delay can lead
> to DB corruption
>
>
> Hi Gentlemen,
>
> Jay Walters wrote:
> > Seems like an application requiring a CMP Persistence Manager and EJB
> > container to execute SQL in a specific order might be ask
rs
-Original Message-
From: Bill Burke
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 6/18/01 4:34 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-434227 ] ejbStore delay can lead toDB
corruption
You'd have the same type of problems with BMP, wouldn't you?
Bill
> -Original Message-
> Fr
My IDE doesn't seem to support 'cowboy neal!' as an indent, is that some new
Java thing?
"how many spaces do you use in your identation
0(!)
1
2
3
4
1024
cowboy neal!"
and I am pretty the majority of answers is "cowboy neal"...
2 spaces sounds great!
___
Seems like an application requiring a CMP Persistence Manager and EJB
container to execute SQL in a specific order might be asking a bit much to
me...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 12:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
y the transaction itself through
> INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE statements. Serializable
> transactions do not experience nonrepeatable reads or
> phantoms.
>
> read-only
> Read-only transactions see only those changes that
> were committed at the time the transaction began and
Actually Oracle will do this, are you using Oracle? You can change the
constraint checking to be deferred until commit.
-Original Message-
From: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 3:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] ejbStore() delay see
Well I am hoping I am just confused and have misunderstood you.
It appeared that you said JDBC connections and Sql*plus ones were different,
and that a if I perform an insert inside a transaction using JDBC that
within the same transaction I would not be able to read the row inserted.
If in fact
I am wondering how many people are using declarative RI and entity beans? I
am sure the DBAs like the RI stuff in the database, but EJB seems to like to
be the only game in town - for example leaving it up to the container to
issue the SQL in whatever order it wants.
Cheers
-Original Messag
Sorry. Ok so I'll read a little slower next time.
Now that you've explained it, how would it work to use database RI
underneath an EJB application. If the bean is in memory but disappears from
the database that isn't all that good. If he's using commit option C, then
next client to reference t
You are still confused Gina, if you go into SQL*Plus and type the following
create table foo ( x varchar(32));
set autocommit off;
insert into foo values ('gina');
select * from foo;
you will see the value just inserted and you are in the middle of the
transaction. Rollback will clean out the t
He wants the update SQL to execute before the remove SQL? The commit isn't
the issue, it's the order of operations.
What does the spec say about when remove() needs to execute the SQL?
My question would be, if the bean has been removed should the persistence
manager still be trying to update it
Hey, looks good and runs good.
One sore spot, tried the search documentation feature looking for db2 and
oracle and got a 404 error back both times.
Great work Marc. Now we can eat our down dogfood...
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
