[julia-users] Re: Julia v0.3.10

2015-06-25 Thread elextr
On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 1:47:51 PM UTC+10, Tony Kelman wrote: > > Hello all! The latest bugfix release of the 0.3.x Julia line has been > released. Binaries are available from the usual place > , > Is the ubuntu packages ppa linked from here going to be u

[julia-users] Re: Installation and User Interface issues

2015-06-25 Thread Joe Tusek
Tony, Problem solved. I was able to get things working by using your last suggestion "deleting the .julia directory then running Pkg.init() again in Julia". Juno then installed a bunch of packages when I ran it and connected to Julia and was able to evaluate the example script from within Juno.

[julia-users] Re: How to debug "Illegal Instruction" in 0.4?

2015-06-25 Thread Tony Kelman
Is this in a VM or some other unusual environment? Old hardware? What was the context, what were you running? Can you try running the same code with julia-debug, and/or inside gdb or lldb? On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 12:08:51 AM UTC-4, Sheehan Olver wrote: > > I got the following crash > > si

[julia-users] Re: Julia v0.3.10

2015-06-25 Thread Tony Kelman
Yes, I suspect it will, but it may take a week or two for Elliot Saba (@staticfloat) to get to it. I can't imagine any of the backports we've made would present any problems to updating the Ubuntu package in the releases PPA, but Elliot's been a bit busy recently and there are enough things bre

[julia-users] ANN: ValidatedNumerics v0.1: Interval arithmetic and rigorous root finding

2015-06-25 Thread David P. Sanders
We are pleased to announce the first public release version of the ValidatedNumerics.jl package, a Julia package for doing rigorous calculations using floating-point based interval arithmetic. This includes methods for rigorously finding roots of 1D real functions. To install the package, do

[julia-users] Re: Installation and User Interface issues

2015-06-25 Thread Tony Kelman
Great, good to hear that. Sorry for the trouble and thanks for your patience and sticking with it. We hope to streamline a lot of these installation hiccups over time. On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 6:58:00 AM UTC-4, Joe Tusek wrote: > > Tony, > > Problem solved. I was able to get things working

Re: [julia-users] Re: How to debug "Illegal Instruction" in 0.4?

2015-06-25 Thread Sheehan Olver
This is on OS X, julia v0.4 master How do I do julia-debug? > On 25 Jun 2015, at 9:06 pm, Tony Kelman wrote: > > Is this in a VM or some other unusual environment? Old hardware? > > What was the context, what were you running? Can you try running the same > code with julia-debug, and/or insi

Re: [julia-users] Re: How to debug "Illegal Instruction" in 0.4?

2015-06-25 Thread Tony Kelman
If you built Julia from source, do make debug On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 7:41:26 AM UTC-4, Sheehan Olver wrote: > > This is on OS X, julia v0.4 master > > How do I do julia-debug? > > > On 25 Jun 2015, at 9:06 pm, Tony Kelman > > wrote: > > Is this in a VM or some other unusual environment? O

[julia-users] Re: Julia v0.3.10

2015-06-25 Thread elextr
On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 9:11:04 PM UTC+10, Tony Kelman wrote: > > Yes, I suspect it will, but it may take a week or two for Elliot Saba > (@staticfloat) to get to it. I can't imagine any of the backports we've > made would present any problems to updating the Ubuntu package in the > rele

Re: [julia-users] Embedding Julia with C++

2015-06-25 Thread Kostas Tavlaridis-Gyparakis
Sorry didn't get your question. In general the problem is that Eclipse doesn't seem to be able to recognize/include this sys.ji file, and I don't know how to fix it. On Wednesday, June 24, 2015 at 6:52:52 PM UTC+2, Tony Kelman wrote: > > Are you running on latest master? This is probably another

[julia-users] Re: Embedding Julia with C++

2015-06-25 Thread Scott Jones
There is no .ji file anymore, although there is a command line option to produce it, --output-ji On Monday, June 22, 2015 at 9:03:31 AM UTC-4, Kostas Tavlaridis-Gyparakis wrote: > > Hello, > I am trying to embed Julia in C++ but I currently face some sort of issues. > I am trying to follow t

[julia-users] Problem with ZMQ and Ijulia

2015-06-25 Thread Grigoriy Isaev
Hi! I am trying to set up Ijulia. I've cleand my PC from all previuos versions of Julia/Ipython and installed fresh 64 bit Anaconda 3 python distribution + downloaded Juno 64 bit. After i launch Ipython i can see Ijulia option, but trying to create notebooks i get "kernell has died" message a

[julia-users] Re: Embedding Julia with C++

2015-06-25 Thread Kostas Tavlaridis-Gyparakis
But, sys.ji does exist in my folder of the path " /home/kostas/workspace/juli/Debug/../lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/julia/" On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 3:18:17 PM UTC+2, Scott Jones wrote: > > There is no .ji file anymore, although there is a command line option to > produce it, > --output-ji > > >

[julia-users] Re: Problem with ZMQ and Ijulia

2015-06-25 Thread Grigoriy Isaev
It seems that there is unfixed bug somewhere in Juno distribution. Latest 64 bit Juno is version 0.3.7 and it has this bug. If i install latest Julia 0.4.0 - zero MQ builds correctly and everything is fine with Ijulia notebooks using 0.4.0 version четверг, 25 июня 2015 г., 16:32:33 UTC+3 поль

Re: [julia-users] Re: Problem with ZMQ and Ijulia

2015-06-25 Thread Miguel Bazdresch
These issues may be relevant: https://github.com/JuliaLang/ZMQ.jl/issues/83 https://github.com/JuliaLang/IJulia.jl/issues/323 -- mb On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Grigoriy Isaev wrote: > It seems that there is unfixed bug somewhere in Juno distribution. Latest > 64 bit Juno is version 0.3.

[julia-users] Re: Guidelines for overriding Base.convert?

2015-06-25 Thread Simon Byrne
For abstract types it is acceptable to return an instance of a subtype, e.g. convert(Integer, 1.0) Otherwise, I suspect you are in for all sorts of trouble, e.g. julia> import Base.convert julia> immutable Foo x::Int end julia> function bar(x) y::Foo y=x

Re: [julia-users] Running a command line program with input arguments

2015-06-25 Thread Stefan Karpinski
The backtick syntax for commands doesn't support this kind of shell feature. You can do this: julia> run("/etc/passwd" |> `head -n10`) ## # User Database # # Note that this file is consulted directly only when the system is running # in single-user mode. At other times this information is provide

Re: [julia-users] JuliaCon registrations open

2015-06-25 Thread Kristoffer Carlsson
Any information about when recorded talks are available? For us who are jealously sitting at home.

[julia-users] libgfortran in a linux install

2015-06-25 Thread Sebastian Good
Dumb packaging question: On Linux (Ubuntu 14), running make binary-dist produces a nice relocatable tarball with relative rpath linking. However it doesn't work unless libgfortran has been installed on the system. I found this odd because libgfortran appears in the build directory (e.g. julia-

Re: [julia-users] JuliaCon registrations open

2015-06-25 Thread Iain Dunning
Hopefully should be much quicker than last year, just going to wildly guess ~2 weeks but don't hold us to it! On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Kristoffer Carlsson wrote: > Any information about when recorded talks are available? For us who are > jealously sitting at home. -- *Iain Dunning

[julia-users] Memory allocation: type uncertainty of temporary variables within in-built routines and operations

2015-06-25 Thread Stef Kynaston
I have a function "myFunc.jl", say (in actuality, this is quite a mesh generation function). I run my program once to start with, and then time the second run: julia> include("myFunc.jl") myFunc (generic function with 1 method) julia> myFunc(); julia> @time myFunc(); elapsed time: 2.745065871

[julia-users] German Wikipedia Article

2015-06-25 Thread Tobias Ruck
Yesterday I saw that the Julia Wikipedia article in German is really bad and incomplete, so I translated what I found in the English one. I'm not a Julia developer and not active in the community, so I would ask you to give me a little hint whenever you update the English Wikipedia article so I

[julia-users] Re: Getting the length of a tuple type

2015-06-25 Thread Tony Fong
I have just put out an update to the Lint.jl master which should have some examples of what you need. Hopefully this would fix the tuple length issue for you. On Wednesday, June 24, 2015 at 2:54:03 PM UTC-4, Josh Langsfeld wrote: > > Thanks, Matt. I hope your stuff does eventually make it into B

Re: [julia-users] Re: Getting the length of a tuple type

2015-06-25 Thread Josh Langsfeld
That does fix everything, but I was hoping to find something that doesn't rely on manual checks of VERSION. At any rate, I didn't have any other problematic case for this stuff, so now that you've fixed Lint I'll just return to my observer status. On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Tony Fong wrote

[julia-users] Re: German Wikipedia Article

2015-06-25 Thread Waldir Pimenta
FYI, the edits are not yet visible to unregistered visitors, and will need to be marked as reviewed by an editor with the proper permissions. I happen to have the permissions, but I don't speak German (I only do basic maintenance stuff there), so if someone can confirm the changes are ok, I can

Re: [julia-users] Tests failing on latest Julia

2015-06-25 Thread Júlio Hoffimann
Hi Matt, The tests are still failing for the same reason, should I open an issue on GitHub? -Jùlio

Re: [julia-users] libgfortran in a linux install

2015-06-25 Thread Elliot Saba
Hmmm, well, it *should*, so that's worrying that it's not doing so on your system. When you run `make binary-dist`, you the makefile should run a script called `fixup-libgfortran.sh`, which does exactly what you want. Here is an example log

Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia v0.3.10

2015-06-25 Thread Elliot Saba
Yes, that's my fault. 0.3.10 is making its way through the buildd servers as we speak. -E On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:52 AM, wrote: > > > On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 9:11:04 PM UTC+10, Tony Kelman wrote: >> >> Yes, I suspect it will, but it may take a week or two for Elliot Saba >> (@staticfloa

Re: [julia-users] Re: Problem with ZMQ and Ijulia

2015-06-25 Thread Tony Kelman
0.3.10 (released yesterday) should fix this error. On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 10:02:09 AM UTC-4, Miguel Bazdresch wrote: > > These issues may be relevant: > > https://github.com/JuliaLang/ZMQ.jl/issues/83 > > https://github.com/JuliaLang/IJulia.jl/issues/323 > > > -- mb > > On Thu, Jun 25, 201

[julia-users] Invitation to JuliaLangEs events

2015-06-25 Thread Ismael VC
To all Julians! Our community *JuliaLangEs * has been invited recently to two important technology events in Mexico. The first one and the also the closest one is "*Campus Party Mexico 2015*", which will be celebrated from 22 to 26 of July at Guadalajara and we h

Re: [julia-users] libgfortran in a linux install

2015-06-25 Thread Sebastian Good
No apparent problems ./contrib/fixup-libgfortran.sh /home/vagrant/julia/julia-cb77503114/lib/julia ‘/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1’ -> ‘/home/vagrant/julia/julia-cb77503114/lib/julia/libgcc_s.so.1’ ‘/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3’ -> ‘/home/vagrant/julia/julia-cb77503114/lib/jul

Re: [julia-users] Re: Guidelines for overriding Base.convert?

2015-06-25 Thread Sheehan Olver
Is that a bug in Julia that wrongly overloading convert is an unsafe operation? Sent from my iPad > On 26 Jun 2015, at 12:22 am, Simon Byrne wrote: > > For abstract types it is acceptable to return an instance of a subtype, e.g. > > convert(Integer, 1.0) > > Otherwise, I suspect you are in fo

Re: [julia-users] libgfortran in a linux install

2015-06-25 Thread Elliot Saba
So the file /home/vagrant/julia/julia-cb77503114/lib/julia/libgfortran.so.3 does not exist? -E On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Sebastian Good < sebast...@palladiumconsulting.com> wrote: > No apparent problems > > ./contrib/fixup-libgfortran.sh > /home/vagrant/julia/julia-cb77503114/lib/julia > ‘

Re: [julia-users] libgfortran in a linux install

2015-06-25 Thread Sebastian Good
Nope, not there. Also in the tarball there is a sys.ji but not a sys.so. In this case sys.so is in the correct location, but didn’t make it into the tarball. On June 25, 2015 at 5:40:10 PM, Elliot Saba (staticfl...@gmail.com) wrote: So the file /home/vagrant/julia/julia-cb77503114/lib/julia/libg

Re: [julia-users] Re: Problem with ZMQ and Ijulia

2015-06-25 Thread Miguel Bazdresch
It doesn't, at least for me. ZMQ tests still segfault. -- mb On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Tony Kelman wrote: > 0.3.10 (released yesterday) should fix this error. > > > On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 10:02:09 AM UTC-4, Miguel Bazdresch wrote: >> >> These issues may be relevant: >> >> https://

Re: [julia-users] How to debug "Illegal Instruction" in 0.4?

2015-06-25 Thread Sheehan Olver
Switching to juliadebug, I get ERROR: ReadOnlyMemoryError() still with no further information. I guess I can manually drill down to the offending line? > On 25 Jun 2015, at 9:51 pm, Tony Kelman wrote: > > If you built Julia from source, do make debug > > > On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at

Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia v0.3.10

2015-06-25 Thread elextr
On Friday, June 26, 2015 at 7:04:48 AM UTC+10, Elliot Saba wrote: > > Yes, that's my fault. 0.3.10 is making its way through the buildd servers > as we speak. > -E > > Thanks for making the PPA, maybe you need some more elves :) Cheers Lex > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:52 AM, > wrote: > >> >

Re: [julia-users] Re: Guidelines for overriding Base.convert?

2015-06-25 Thread Stefan Karpinski
Yes – adding a normal method should never segfault. Can you open an issue? On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Sheehan Olver wrote: > Is that a bug in Julia that wrongly overloading convert is an unsafe > operation? > > Sent from my iPad > > On 26 Jun 2015, at 12:22 am, Simon Byrne wrote: > > For

Re: [julia-users] Re: Problem with ZMQ and Ijulia

2015-06-25 Thread Tony Kelman
These are two different problems, sorry. The issues you pointed to appear to be Linux-only, and due to a version upgrade of libzmq - probably little or nothing to do with Julia base. And also not yet completely identified or solved. The original post here was on Windows, "Provider PackageManage

[julia-users] make iterators default in for-loops

2015-06-25 Thread holocronweaver
By default, Python 3 uses iterators for loop operations like zip and enumerate. Thus there is no need for a macro like @itr found in the Iterators.jl package. I am new to Julia and have difficulty understanding why the default behavior would not use iterators instead of tuples. Are there any pl

Re: [julia-users] How to debug "Illegal Instruction" in 0.4?

2015-06-25 Thread Tony Kelman
What exactly is your code doing? Does it involve mmap? On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 8:27:34 PM UTC-4, Sheehan Olver wrote: > > Switching to juliadebug, I get > > *ERROR: ReadOnlyMemoryError()* > > > still with no further information. I guess I can manually drill down to > the offending line? >

Re: [julia-users] How to debug "Illegal Instruction" in 0.4?

2015-06-25 Thread Sheehan Olver
Actually, it turned out that the cause was another faulty convert implementation, see other thread I started I'm filing an issue Sent from my iPhone > On 26 Jun 2015, at 1:07 pm, Tony Kelman wrote: > > What exactly is your code doing? Does it involve mmap? > > >> On Thursday, June 25, 201

Re: [julia-users] Re: Guidelines for overriding Base.convert?

2015-06-25 Thread Sheehan Olver
Yep I'll open an issue with Simons example. I had another issue which hadn't narrowed down the problem which I'll replace Sent from my iPhone > On 26 Jun 2015, at 12:55 pm, Stefan Karpinski wrote: > > Yes – adding a normal method should never segfault. Can you open an issue? > >> On Thu, Jun

Re: [julia-users] libgfortran in a linux install

2015-06-25 Thread Elliot Saba
Can you please gist the full output of `make cleanall; make binary-dist`? -E On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Sebastian Good < sebast...@palladiumconsulting.com> wrote: > Nope, not there. > > Also in the tarball there is a sys.ji but not a sys.so. In this case > sys.so is in the correct location,

Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia v0.3.10

2015-06-25 Thread Elliot Saba
We at the north pole of technical computing *love* elves of all kinds. Applications are open. :) -E On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:53 PM, wrote: > > > On Friday, June 26, 2015 at 7:04:48 AM UTC+10, Elliot Saba wrote: >> >> Yes, that's my fault. 0.3.10 is making its way through the buildd >> servers

Re: [julia-users] Re: Julia v0.3.10

2015-06-25 Thread Elliot Saba
Who are we kidding, we don't have an application process. We're opensource, the closest we get is contributor guidelines . :P -E

[julia-users] Re: make iterators default in for-loops

2015-06-25 Thread Matt Bauman
Zip and enumerate are also iterators in Julia. The little performance improvement that the @itr macro provides isn't because they aren't iterators… it's simply from a little quirk in Julia 0.3. In the latest development versions (0.4-), however, there is no longer a performance difference bet

Re: [julia-users] Re: Guidelines for overriding Base.convert?

2015-06-25 Thread Stefan Karpinski
Thanks! On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Sheehan Olver wrote: > Yep I'll open an issue with Simons example. I had another issue which > hadn't narrowed down the problem which I'll replace > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 26 Jun 2015, at 12:55 pm, Stefan Karpinski > wrote: > > Yes – adding a nor

Re: [julia-users] Re: Guidelines for overriding Base.convert?

2015-06-25 Thread Sheehan Olver
OK I submitted issue #11874 > On 26 Jun 2015, at 2:06 pm, Stefan Karpinski wrote: > > Thanks! > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Sheehan Olver > wrote: > Yep I'll open an issue with Simons example. I had another issue which hadn't > narrowed down the problem

Re: [julia-users] How to debug "Illegal Instruction" in 0.4?

2015-06-25 Thread Sheehan Olver
See issue #11874 for a similar example that caused the segfault > On 26 Jun 2015, at 1:11 pm, Sheehan Olver wrote: > > Actually, it turned out that the cause was another faulty convert > implementation, see other thread I started > > I'm filing an issue > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 2

Re: [julia-users] German Wikipedia Article

2015-06-25 Thread René Donner
I proof-read the changes, they look good to me! Thanks Tobias for tackling this, the previous entry was really not more than a stub.