Re: [LARTC] Layer-7 don't work

Nikolay Nikolaev wrote: snip it's not SKYPE, i think it is normal? Yes. L7 relies on packet heuristics, so it may not always match the packets you're looking for. Some patterns are easier to discover and match than others. ___ LARTC mailing

Re: [LARTC] Problems with Routing and Masquerading

Vinod Chandran wrote: Hi, Thanks Jason for the solution. With CONNMARK, I was able to route the packets properly. Cool, but I don't think that was me. ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

Re: [LARTC] Problems with Routing and Masquerading

Luciano Ruete wrote: snip Besides that, you need to solve the problems that multipath will arise, like TOS situation described above or route cache expiration, that could made long term conns to be routed over a new iface. The solutions i know are CONNMARK(kernel=2.6.12) and julian's

RE: [LARTC] iptables CLASSIFY and MARK not working?

Eliot, Wireless and Server Administrator, Great Lakes Internet wrote: Ok, I ran into a different issue with using the tc filters which basically puts me right back to using the iptables classify target -- which means that I am running right back into the same problem I was on before. snip

Re: [LARTC] Re: QoS book

Robert Gabriel wrote: Thanks, I have already checked it out these sites: snip http://edseek.com/~jasonb/articles/traffic_shaping/ snip The documentation is so disparate, it's highly frustrating... That's disappointing. What can I add to help or clarify? Thanks.

Re: [LARTC] have any one tried Snmp extension to Net-SNMP daemon

server program using soap which was realy intresting but when i tried to compile it ended up with many errors ,, I had similar errors and gave up on it back in 2004. I guess it's not maintained any longer. -- Jason Boxman http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff

Re: [LARTC] Detecting p2p traffic

as ipp2p works for me. -- Jason Boxman http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Re: [LARTC] icmp latency question

Andrew Beverley wrote: snip For SSH I have: tc class add dev imq0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 50kbit ceil 800kbit prio 1 tc qdisc add dev imq0 parent 1:10 handle 10: sfq perturb 10 tc filter add dev imq0 parent 1:0 prio 0 protocol ip handle 10 fw flowid 1:10 sfq's default queue of 128

Re: [LARTC] Sip Traffic

of that include eMule traffic? I stopped having success with eMule protocols and L7 a year or two ago and the pattern hasn't been updated in ages. -- Jason Boxman http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http

Re: [LARTC] linux box as vlan p2p limiter and firewall?

Andraz Sraka wrote: re On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 19:20 -0500, Jason Boxman wrote: I like L7, but be sure you're ready to write some pattern matches. I've been using ipp2p[1] and it matches all my p2p traffic. ymmv of course. [1] http://www.ipp2p.org/ can newer 2.6 (2.6.15.x) kernels

Re: [LARTC] linux box as vlan p2p limiter and firewall?

promising .. I like L7, but be sure you're ready to write some pattern matches. I've been using ipp2p[1] and it matches all my p2p traffic. ymmv of course. [1] http://www.ipp2p.org/ -- Jason Boxman http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff

Re: [LARTC] HFSC and default qdisc backlog

packets has little effect if there's no bottleneck. -- Jason Boxman http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Re: [LARTC] Swap size

[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Thanks to all, but to be more particular, Im going to use the machine with 8 or 12 Gig of physical memory for squid caching, and we all know that caching consumes to much memory. Our objective actually is to cache the most popular pages on the memory so that it will

Re: [LARTC] tcng

something obvious, but never managed to get it to do anything interesting on my end. -- Jason Boxman http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Re: [LARTC] Patch to allow for the ATM cell tax

Jesper Dangaard Brouer said: snip I just held a technical talk about the ADSL-optimizer (4/3-2006) at linuxforum.dk. Where I promised the audience that I would try to get the patches to the kernel and TC into the main line. It seem work on this front is already in progress, Cool! :-) I

Re: [LARTC] tcng

questions I've seen go unanswered, including my own, I'd say skip it and learn `tc` itself. You'll be glad you did. -- Jason Boxman http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin

Re: [LARTC] Patch to allow for the ATM cell tax

that reduce the overhead per MTU such that it positively compensates for the standard 5 byte overhead per ATM cell for each packet? Obviously I don't follow. -- Jason Boxman http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC

Re: [LARTC] Patch to allow for the ATM cell tax

On Friday 03 March 2006 08:43, Andreas Hasenack wrote: On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 07:27:13PM -0500, Jason Boxman wrote: Any chance something like this can be applied to q_tbf? It's been classful for a while and I find a tbf with a prio under it works quite well for my tbf qdisc is classfull

Re: [LARTC] Patch to allow for the ATM cell tax

Andreas Hasenack said: On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 11:18:00AM -0500, Jason Boxman wrote: On Friday 03 March 2006 08:43, Andreas Hasenack wrote: On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 07:27:13PM -0500, Jason Boxman wrote: Any chance something like this can be applied to q_tbf? It's been classful for a while

Re: [LARTC] Patch to allow for the ATM cell tax

Stephen Hemminger said: On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 08:18:52 +1000 Russell Stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 14:51 +0100, Markus Schulz wrote: Why you don't use the existing overhead parameter? It's useless to have two parameters which do the exact same thing (existing

Re: [LARTC] Patch to allow for the ATM cell tax

something like this can be applied to q_tbf? It's been classful for a while and I find a tbf with a prio under it works quite well for my configuration. Jesper's patch indicates untested support for other schedulers including tbf, so it's certainly possible. Thanks. -- Jason Boxman http

Re: [LARTC] how mani class can i have

never had to use more than 1 to FFF, so I don't know how much higher they go. You'd need some kind of association database if you're doing it by the last IP octet. 1 - 1, 255 - FF, ect. -- Jason Boxman http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff

Re: [LARTC] load balancing and failover

://www.tksq.org/iprt2 $ host www.tksq.org www.tksq.org does not exist, try again -- Jason Boxman http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Fwd: Re: [LARTC] inspecting what's going in a class

Subject: Re: [LARTC] inspecting what's going in a class Date: Monday 05 December 2005 09:38 From: Ethy H. Brito [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 00:59:46 -0500 Jason Boxman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sadly not possible with tc-filter. But perhaps I could do this for tc

Re: [LARTC] inspecting what's going in a class

with Vincent Perrier's sch_spy module. sch_log is also good for this: http://kernel.umbrella.ro/net/sch_log/v0.4/sch_log-0.4.tar.gz /pch -- Jason Boxman http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http

Re: [LARTC] HTB - prio and rate

Brian J. Murrell said: On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 21:25 +0100, Andreas Klauer wrote: Actually, a class is always able to use it's rate at any time. The prio has only an effect when the class is trying to borrow bandwidth from others - then the high prio classes are allowed to take what they need

Re: [LARTC] HTB - prio and rate

Brian J. Murrell said: I really don't seem to be getting this. ~sigh~ It'll come with time. As I wrote before I'm not interested in dividing bandwidth up, just prioritizing the use of the full bandwidth by all-comers. Yes. So I figure I want a TBF in my root class to prevent the queue in

Re: [LARTC] Monitoring the traffic shaping setup

://edseek.com/software-ive-written/ -- Jason Boxman http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Re: [LARTC] tc - in an abnormal LAN

be far easier to just ask, no? -- Jason Boxman http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Re: [LARTC] Re:Does HTB consider PRIO or not? 3

it at your own risk only. Yes, I had that problem with earlier 2.6 kernels, but since 2.6.9 it seems to be fine. -- Jason Boxman http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman

Re: [LARTC] TC/HTB Graphs

/code/polltc-1.02.tar.gz You might find polltc useful. -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC

Re: [LARTC] QOS monitoring?

] script to log to either Munin or an RRD database it creates. [1] http://edseek.com/~jasonb/software.shtml -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff

Re: [LARTC] urgent question about tcng!

On Wednesday 27 April 2005 12:17, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote: snip I think you might want to check Apache's mod_bandwidth / mod_throttle instead of QoS. There's also bw_mod if you're running Apache2, which for me is working fine so far. http://www.ivn.cl/apache/

Re: Fwd: [LARTC] HTB Weird Shaping Question(Bug?). Please Help!

On Wednesday 27 April 2005 14:56, Andy Furniss wrote: snip It is very easy to make it look like it though, just start an upload while downloading something and watch your down rate fall apart. This is TCP and the fact that adsl modems tend to have huge buffers not the link. The first thing to

Re: [LARTC] HTB ATM MPU OVERHEAD (without any patching)

modem provides no useful information either. -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC

Re: [LARTC] ubuntu

back, you should be good to go. -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff ___ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http

Re: [LARTC] Tools to get current bandwidth of queue or speed rate?

. You can do the same thing for your qdiscs, too. -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff ___ LARTC mailing list / LARTC

Re: [LARTC] Tools to get current bandwidth of queue or speed rate?

On Tuesday 15 February 2005 00:01, Vincent wrote: How to do the same thing for the qdisc (ifconfig eth0?) ?? You could try `tc -s qdisc show dev eth0` for statistics. -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida

Re: [LARTC] Tools to get current bandwidth of queue or speed rate?

to do that is to delete the whole structure with `tc qdisc del ...` and then recreate it. If anyone else has a better way to zero out qdisc statistics I'd be curious to know. -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University

Re: [LARTC] How to save ip route 2 commands

On Thursday 10 February 2005 14:54, Deepak Seshadri wrote: Hello List, I configured a GRE tunnel between a Linux server Cisco. I would like to save the commands somewhere so that next time the machine boots up the tunnel will be formed automatically. One way is to put the commands in

Re: [LARTC] can't understand strange PRIO behaviour

. Here are the proofs, my rule filters to flowid 10:2, but everything goes to 20:1. Have I made an error? Am I missing some kernel feature? My versions: Kernel 2.6.10 and newest iproute from Debian unstable (20041019-2). Strange. snip -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems

Re: [LARTC] Info about VoiP Qos

configuration is at fault. ( Shameless plug: http://trekweb.com/~jasonb/articles/traffic_shaping/monitoring.html ) -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff

Re: [LARTC] Hardware solution? (or v.easy software fix instead)

On Thursday 20 January 2005 17:07, ajpearce wrote: snip So I need an answer to avoid arguments. - Is there a plush hardware solution to the problem? You could always get one of those Linksys routers that runs Linux and configure Linux traffic control on it. snip If I go for the computer

Re: [LARTC] iproute2 + iptables - match the connection time or packets sent/recieved

can reclassify that traffic from interactive-Web to bulk-Web or something similar. I've been meaning to do this myself, but haven't gotten to it. -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida http://edseek.com

Re: [LARTC] Sharing/splitting bandwidth on a link while bandwidth of the link is variable (or unknown) ?

On Wednesday 05 January 2005 11:59, Jonathan Day wrote: snip On the other hand, if it's an exact split over a fairly long timeslice, you use a class-based queueing system and measure what's been sent out of each queue. You then predict what the net bandwidth is over the whole timeslice, by

Re: [LARTC] Suggestion - table of QoS mechanisms

patches forward-ported to recent kernels is merged into the qnet patch series, making it hard to extract. That's too bad. I had wanted to include something about ESFQ but never got around to it, since SFQ generally suits my needs. -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator

Re: [LARTC] load balancing over multiple ISP links

ro0ot said: Hi, Can someone explain in technicality on how the load balancing over multiple ISP links? You might try Christoph Simon's howto for using multiple independent Internet connections[1]. [1] http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt ___ LARTC

Re: [LARTC] kernel configuration and tc commands for traffic shaping

/traffic_shaping/ Scuse me if some of my questions are FAQs. Thanks in advance. Best regards. -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff

Re: [LARTC] Shaping traffic on heavily oversubscribed links?

it's really encapsulated over an ATM network. Bandwidth available for Ethernet packets varies depending on how many packets are going out over the link and the size of each packet. -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University

Re: [LARTC] PARAMs

the same thing for '[d|s]port 53 0xff' matches, too. I think those keywords are syntactic sugar. [1] http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.adv-filter.html -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida http://edseek.com/ - Linux

Re: [LARTC] outbound shaping

the transfers on certain usernames and shapes them on the fly. Works very well in my situation. I will continue to test both options to see which is best for me. You could also use Netfilter and the owner match module. -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg

Re: [LARTC] Help with prioritizing internet Cafe Terminals

--set-mark 1 iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0 -p tcp -s 192.168.0.4 -j MARK --set-mark 1 -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff

Re: [LARTC] Torrent support in IPP2P

Grab all eDonkey/eMule/Overnet data packets Does anyone know if it handles the new Kademilia eMule protocol? -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff

Re: [LARTC] Bandwidth throttling/limiting for all traffic

classified. -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman

Re: [LARTC] SEPARATING VOIP AND SURFING

be hard. I don't think queue length is involved here. The difference for that leaf with sfq versus pfifo was pretty consistent. I should test with different queue lengths for pfifo. Thanks. -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing

Re: [LARTC] hfsc scheduler

situation. I think I understand what hfsc is attempting to address, but it's never been made clear how exactly you interact with Linux's hfsc implementation via the `tc` binary. -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University

Re: [LARTC] HTB: Problem with excess bandwidth distribution

- should I try it? CBQ won't magically work over multiple interfaces without something like IMQ, just like HTB. -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff

Re: [LARTC] hfsc scheduler

/plugins/hfsc.html http://trash.net/~kaber/hfsc/ I'd be curious to see actual examples of usage, though. -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff

Re: [LARTC] graphics HTB

On Tuesday 26 October 2004 11:55, Andreas Klauer wrote: Am Tuesday 26 October 2004 16:16 schrieb emo terziev: Hi is it any tool like show.pl by Stef Coene to generate graph with classes but for HTB Based on show.pl: http://www.metamorpher.de/files/tc-graph.pl Example graph:

[LARTC] Traffic Control Diagnostic Graphing Utility

://trekweb.com/~jasonb/code/polltc-1.0.tar.gz I hope someone else finds it useful. Comments welcome. -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff

Re: [LARTC] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address

: printing eip: Oct 20 16:52:24 pototogorri kernel: c0267fb4 Oct 20 16:52:24 pototogorri kernel: *pde = Oct 20 16:52:24 pototogorri kernel: Oops: [#1] I had to upgrade to 2.6.9 to resolve my Oops. -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center

Re: [LARTC] Is this actually possible?

and beyond, but not in 2.6.7 and below. (I didn't check 2.6.8.0.) -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff ___ LARTC mailing list

Re: [LARTC] HTB

On Thursday 14 October 2004 14:23, sistemas wrote: Hi all I'm new in this list and i hope to lear and to help if possible. But firt i need help :-( I have this messege in my syslog when my classes and qdiscs goes down. Can any one know what does it mean? I used to have an Oops an awful

Re: AW: [Fwd: Re: [LARTC] ssh and cs LAG]

kernels and 2.6 series kernels on the box in question. -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff ___ LARTC mailing list

Re: [LARTC] Qdisc statistics project

information every five minutes and pass that off for graphing. [3] http://edseek.com/foo.png [4] http://www.linpro.no/projects/munin/ -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS

Re: [LARTC] NAT+mangle+tc

rules. Personally, I use the gShield iptables firewall. As for `tc`, you might look into the LARTC HOWTO. http://lartc.org/ -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff

Re: [LARTC] HTB weird problem ....

On Friday 08 October 2004 10:58, Andy Furniss wrote: snip Also you may need to set Hz higher or use psched = CPU for timing. In 2.6.9 this looks like it'll be part of the `make config` process itself. :) -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center

Re: [LARTC] tc monitoring

that lets you access this data directly. Parsing tc output is just a bad hack. ;) There's also SNMP extensions for QoS. http://x-ray.prokon.cz/data/snmp/downloads/ -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida http

[LARTC] Oops from netlink or what?

value. -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman

Re: [LARTC] Oops from netlink or what?

On Wednesday 29 September 2004 19:41, Thomas Graf wrote: * Jason Boxman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-29 19:29 I reported this previously and it was verified. Is this a bug in netlink or what? Who should I report this to? Can you reproduce it? Can you try with latest bk snapshot

Re: [LARTC] Please advise how to set up for 5 IPs

On Tuesday 28 September 2004 15:36, gypsy wrote: snip How can I implement ingress shaping / policing to limit the combined incoming rate, regardless of IP, to about 700K (the connection is actually 730K in and 690K out). Only because it REALLY annoys me to drop an already received packet, I

[LARTC] New L7-Filter patterns for Kademlia / eMule?

to do with it thereafter. Thanks. -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: [LARTC] New L7-Filter patterns for Kademlia / eMule?

to decipher. I'd expect Kad to be of similar complexity. -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL

Re: [LARTC] Prioritizing forwarded traffic over locally generated traffic

On Friday 24 September 2004 12:55, Neil Greatorex wrote: Many thanks to both of you for your replies. I have managed to get the setup working how I intended now - by using HTB classes/qdiscs. I had tried this approach before as one of many, however what I had failed to do was create the two

Re: [LARTC] Prioritizing forwarded traffic over locally generated traffic

On Thursday 23 September 2004 18:09, Neil Greatorex wrote: Hi, I'm a complete newbie at this traffic shaping / QoS stuff so please excuse me if this is a silly question. I've searched and searched on Google and I just end up confusing myself even more, so I thought I'd post my question to

Re: [LARTC] HTB_HYSTERESIS???

On Thursday 09 September 2004 08:01, ciprian niculescu wrote: Hello, what does mean the HTB_HYSTERESIS? Sacrifice speed for accuracy when set to 0. ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO:

Re: [LARTC] tc script stopped working

On Wednesday 21 July 2004 16:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've used tc in the past for shaping, upon learning of tcng, I redid my config, and load it using tcc. I thought this was great, as the new script is much easier to maintain, and is so much simpler. The new script was working for about

Re: [LARTC] QoS for Voip.

On Friday 16 July 2004 11:53, Andreas Klauer wrote: snip At home, I have a different approach. There's just fair sharing between custumers (err, flatmates). Each person gets his HTB class, all HTB classes have the same priorities and rates, so everyone gets the same amount of bandwidth no

Re: [LARTC] tcng/tc setup

On Wednesday 14 July 2004 05:54, Gareth Glaccum wrote: Hi all, Can someone please help with a tcng setup? I have played with tc and tcng in the past, and now would like to get some serious rules in place. However, I have a difficulty in setting them up. I'd suggest using `tc` and using

Re: [LARTC] TC Hashing Filters

On Wednesday 14 July 2004 14:06, Adam Towarnyckyj wrote: snip As for your suggestion about the classid, I'm a bit confused as to what you mean about decrementing it. Could you be a little more specific on where this is in the script? snip script I think he means start with classid

Re: [LARTC] Layer 7 netfilter not working

On Monday 12 July 2004 13:46, Mike wrote: You may be marking on the ingress interface. Locally generated packets do not go through that NIC and therefore do not get marked. You would have to mark them on the INPUT chain of your egress interface. Keeping in mind that INPUT doesn't see both

Re: [LARTC] Layer 7 netfilter not working

On Friday 09 July 2004 13:10, FB wrote: Hello there! I am trying to get traffic shaping working on my Linux router (debian woody 3r02) and for some things I wanted to use the layer 7 packet classifier, but I can't get it to work. Here is what I did: -downloaded the patches from

Re: [LARTC] Layer 7 netfilter not working

On Friday 09 July 2004 14:58, FB wrote: snip Doesn't change anything :-( BTW, when I use the setting from the NETFILTER HOWTO page: iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -m layer7 --l7proto http -j MARK --set-mark 1 and change it (as written in the howto under blocking) to: iptables -t mangle

Re: [LARTC] htb vs hsfc

On Thursday 24 June 2004 13:21, Vincent Perrier wrote: HTB versus HFSC, both qdisc offer the same kind of service, if you want to see comparative test results, go to http://www.rawsoft.org at the line TEST RESULTS you will find the results for a sharing test and a burst test. You will see

Re: [LARTC] htb filter

parent 2: vs parent 2:0. Both give same result. Exactly. 2: is simply a short hand for 2:0, for example. -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff

Re: [LARTC] Modems: Cable or DSL digital blunders that lartc may help with.

(The TCP limit for 'giving up') * 7(The number of connectios) of these droped/missing packets that every connection gives up. read about this on your own time If you're not going to explain the situation who do you expect is going to research it on their time? -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer

Re: [LARTC] patch: HTB update for ADSL users

On Tuesday 22 June 2004 06:00, Ed Wildgoose wrote: snip Your upstream will be 256Kbits of ATM bandwidth. This consists of 53 byte packets with 48 bytes of data. So you already only have 256 * 48/53 of real bandwidth. We then have to take off PPP headers and PPPoE headers. snip We are

Re: [LARTC] patch: HTB update for ADSL users

On Sunday 20 June 2004 09:16, Ed Wildgoose wrote: Jason Boxman wrote: On Friday 18 June 2004 07:45, Ed Wildgoose wrote: OK, here it is. Near perfect bandwidth calculation for ADSL users. Patch iproute2 with the HTB stuff and then this: Did I miss this the first time around? There's

Re: [LARTC] management of virus and p2p-traffic

-- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Re: [LARTC] patch: HTB update for ADSL users

ms I have attached a unified `diff` with both the HTB `tc` patch and Ed Wildgoose's new PPPoA overhead patch as a unified patch. -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff

Re: [LARTC] patch: HTB update for ADSL users

would explain why the original tc patch did not have any effect for me. I'm eager to try this out as soon as I have some time. Thanks for the patch! snip -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida http

Re: [LARTC] QoS net-snmp ?

: snmpwalk -m GNU-LINUX-KERNEL-QOS -v 1 -c public localhost qos [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls .snmp/mibs/ QOS.txt I'm lost...!!! Bests andres -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS

Re: [LARTC] tc + snmp

On Friday 18 June 2004 07:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I have try to compile net-snmp with QoS patch from http://x-ray.prokon.cz/data/snmp/ but got error, i have try many times but still got the same result. I have compiled it without any problems. What errors did you receive? Did

Re: [LARTC] QOS Script difficulty on bridge

On Thursday 17 June 2004 03:29, Ed Wildgoose wrote: sni Consider: Internet - Router - Eth1 - br0 - Eth0 - local net Now by applying QOS to eth1 I control outgoing traffic from everywhere. By applying QOS to eth0 I control incoming to the localnet (great), but NOT to the local bridge machine

Re: [LARTC] QOS Script difficulty on bridge

On Wednesday 16 June 2004 11:53, Ed Wildgoose wrote: snip Ed W P.S. Anyone using this script on 2.6 with a bridge needs to be aware that the syntax for tc has changed. You can't use tc -i eth0 anymore, you need tc -i br0 -m physdev --physdev-in eth0. And the same for -o. Hope that helps

Re: [LARTC] Re: Shaping incoming traffic on the other interface

On Thursday 10 June 2004 16:07, Greg Stark wrote: snip I'm using sfq as well. But I'm wondering if I wouldn't be better off with pfifo with a short queue. One of the entries in the HTB faq suggests using sfq can make it hard to limit bandwidth precisely because it requires enough memory that

Re: [LARTC] Re: how flexible is ingress traffic policing to bandwidth limit?

get dropped fast enough instead of filling HTB queues and then dropping. If you're curious about RED, here's a possible example implementation for ingress policing: http://digriz.org.uk/jdg-qos-script/ snip -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center

Re: [LARTC] Re: how flexible is ingress traffic policing to bandwidth limit?

On Wednesday 09 June 2004 16:09, Greg Stark wrote: Sanjay Arora [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sorry to interrupt the flow, especially being a newbie, but won´t the sender just retransmit the dropped packets at the same rate? no. I am not so thorogh with TCP/IP, but is there something in the

[LARTC] Oops on tc-graph.pl of all things

. The box has to be toggled manually to bring it back. Thoughts anyone? Thanks. -- Jason Boxman Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff ___ LARTC

Re: [LARTC] how flexible is ingress traffic policing to bandwidth limit?

On Tuesday 08 June 2004 14:35, Greg Stark wrote: [I sent this earlier but I guess the list is subscriber-only?] I just set up wondershaper, it has a simple filter on the downstream direction to limit the bandwidth usage: tc qdisc add dev $DEV handle : ingress tc filter add dev $DEV

  1   2   >