[leaf-devel] LRP news

2002-09-19 Thread Mike Sensney
h usage is minimal. Directly Outside the USA (Carribean, etc) might be preferable. Dave Mike Sensney Association Services, Inc. PO Box 58530, Seattle, WA 98138-1530 206-623-8632 - Fax 206-575-9255

Re[3]: [Leaf-devel] Dave Cinege

2002-08-08 Thread Mike Sensney
Sorry. Didn't mean to cause offence. Thursday, August 8, 2002, 1:51:19 PM, Ray Olszewski wrote: RO> At 01:23 PM 8/8/02 -0700, Mike Sensney wrote: >>Thursday, August 8, 2002, 1:20:45 PM, Ray Olszewski wrote: >> >>RO> What do you mean by "DNS is not working"

Re[4]: [Leaf-devel] Dave Cinege

2002-08-08 Thread Mike Sensney
it so I stayed on the list. Well, I just checked my archive for July and counted 45 messages, ending with the one on 7/24. And there have been none since. Mike Sensney --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to

Re[2]: [Leaf-devel] Dave Cinege

2002-08-08 Thread Mike Sensney
Thursday, August 8, 2002, 1:20:45 PM, Ray Olszewski wrote: RO> What do you mean by "DNS is not working"? My tests say it is working just RO> fine. Excerpts below: RO> ray@waverly:~$ whois linuxrouter.org Whois only looks up the domain registration. It does not check to see if DNS is w

Re[2]: [Leaf-devel] Dave Cinege

2002-08-08 Thread Mike Sensney
ines >> in the Linkscape.net domain). >> >> -Scott >> >> On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Mike Sensney wrote: >> >> > News Flash for what it is worth... >> > >> > I tried to get through to www.linuxrouter.org and couldn't. Further >

RE: [Leaf-devel] q regarding an ftp site for leaf-project.org

2002-02-27 Thread Mike Sensney
same directory on the new machine. At 04:50 PM 2/27/2002 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote: >At 2002-02-27 16:28 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote: >>At 2002-02-27 10:45 -0800, Mike Sensney wrote: >>>Storage of large files including CD images don't seem to be an issue. >> >>>I

RE: [Leaf-devel] q regarding an ftp site for leaf-project.org

2002-02-27 Thread Mike Sensney
At 06:41 AM 2/27/2002 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote: >At 2002-02-26 23:16 -0800, Steven Peck wrote: >>Well, that may be a way around the storage limits I have seen message >>threads about that we are running up against on SF. >BTW, our released files are already on Ibiblio.org as part of the SF >mi

Re: [Leaf-devel] q regarding an ftp site for leaf-project.org (was different)

2002-02-26 Thread Mike Sensney
At 12:06 PM 2/26/2002 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I have no objection to this, but we would need several things to >happen. Files stored there would have to be updated through some >mechanism when there is one in place already on sourceforge. Maybe the primary file storage site should no

Re: [Leaf-devel] LRP 2.9.8

2002-02-26 Thread Mike Sensney
How is this? LRP 2.9.8 The latest release from Dave Cinege for the "Linux Router Project". Many people are still using this and earlier versions of LRP. It is getting a little long in the tooth. Last updated on ??/??/?? and included here for historical significance. At 09:54 PM 2/26/2002 -0600,

Re: [Leaf-devel] Announcing leaf-project.org site name.

2002-02-26 Thread Mike Sensney
Why do LEAF files need/have to be stored at SF? We could use Ibiblio for a file repository. They allow ftp access and recently they added another terabyte of storage. They also have excellent bandwidth. At least downloads from there seem to be faster than from SF. ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux

RE: [Leaf-devel] SF Mirror

2002-02-18 Thread Mike Sensney
Ibiblio might be a good mirror for LEAF. They just added another terabyte of storage online, they have a lot of bandwidth, they are Linux friendly, and they are willing to host .org web sites. http://www.ibiblio.org/about.html BTW, both leaf-project.org and leaf-central.org are currently availabl

Re: [Leaf-devel] CF (write protect) + IDE adapter

2002-02-08 Thread Mike Sensney
At 09:29 AM 2/8/2002 -0600, guitarlynn wrote: ... >In other words, how many folks have said: "Can I run LEAF on a >harddrive (IDE)". We say, "you can, but it is a security risk compared >to a floppy". What would it mean to be able to say: "You can use a hd, >but if you want it as secure as the flo

[Leaf-devel] The secret to Gentoo's speed

2002-01-30 Thread Mike Sensney
I am a member of a local LUG where I live. Lately there has been a lot of interest in the Gentoo distribution. Reportedly it runs faster that other distributions. So I've been loading it onto a Dell GXa 266MHz I happen to have on hand. http://www.gentoo.org/doc/build.html Since the process include

[Leaf-devel] Telnet script

2002-01-28 Thread Mike Sensney
Here is an interesting little telnet client written in bash. I haven't tried it so I don't know if it works... Author: Tim Waugh at Red Hat. http://people.redhat.com/twaugh/ftp/pmt/pmt

Re: [Leaf-devel] Re: Ticker script

2002-01-23 Thread Mike Sensney
At 03:59 PM 1/23/2002 -0600, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: >Oops! I was testing under bash...apparently echo has a somewhat broken >echo >command (as it seems like you already found out). Yes, I had noticed that little annoyance. But I just did some more testing and discovered you can double esc

Re: [Leaf-devel] Perl.lrp

2001-12-08 Thread Mike Sensney
You can find perl4.lrp, perl5.lrp and perl5m.lrp here: ftp://ftp.linuxrouter.org/pub/mirrors/ftp.linuxrouter.org/pub/linux/linux-router/dists/2.9.8/packages At 06:30 PM 12/08/2001 +0100, B. wrote: >Hello All! > >Simple Question: >Is there a perl.lrp existing?? Is it difficult to implement it??

[Leaf-devel] Initrd Dynamic

2001-09-23 Thread Mike Sensney
Dave Cinege has released a new Initrd. http://lists.kernelnotes.de/linux-kernel/Week-of-Mon-20010917/041481.html http://lists.kernelnotes.de/linux-kernel/Week-of-Mon-20010917/041482.html http://lists.kernelnotes.de/linux-kernel/Week-of-Mon-20010917/041499.html http://lists.kernelnotes.de/linux-k

Re: [Leaf-devel] ANNOUNCE: lrp.c0wz.com:81

2001-08-21 Thread Mike Sensney
@home has got troubles. It may not be around too much longer. http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1004-202-6928152.html At 09:52 AM 08/21/2001 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote >Everyone, >@Home is blocking port 80, so c0wz is now available on port 81. > >http://lrp.c0wz.com:81 > >-- >Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [Leaf-devel] Dynamic DNS client

2001-08-20 Thread Mike Sensney
I compiled it on Slink. It is small so I attached it to the list. At 11:05 PM 08/20/2001 +1000, robert stanford wrote >Hi there everybody, >Ive been trying Shane Boulters ez-ipupdate lrp but >unfortunately my isp has an invisible proxy and my requests keep resolving >to i

Re: [Leaf-devel] Compressing kernel with UPX ??? (slitghly OT)

2001-08-15 Thread Mike Sensney
At 09:40 AM 08/15/2001 +0200, Jacques Nilo wrote >That was it ! I was using the latest 1.2 version compiled under >Debian/slink and using UCL 0.92 and was getting an >UnknownExecutableFormatException error message when trying to compress >my kernel. This info cannot be found on the upx web site !

[Leaf-devel] Kernel size

2001-08-09 Thread Mike Sensney
I submit this for what it is worth. Probably not a lot. I had noticed in the past that it seemed the 486 kernel was larger than the 386 kernel. So when I set up to compile the 2.2.19 kernel I decided to set up a script file to compile the kernel in all five CPU flavors and also the 386 with F

Re: [Leaf-devel] Wireless PPP -> was NoCat.net

2001-07-27 Thread Mike Sensney
At 09:43 AM 07/27/2001 -0400, David Douthitt wrote >Mike Sensney wrote: >> >> At 05:08 PM 07/26/2001 -0400, David Douthitt wrote >> > As a ham operator myself, I've a question for you wireless wizards. >> > I've heard that newer cell phones operate

Re: [Leaf-devel] Wireless PPP -> was NoCat.net

2001-07-26 Thread Mike Sensney
At 05:08 PM 07/26/2001 -0400, David Douthitt wrote >As a ham operator myself, I've a question for you wireless wizards. >I've heard that newer cell phones operate somewhere in 2GHz, and now you >mention this. The unlicensed 2.4 GHz band is also referred to as the IMS band, or Industry, Medical

Re: [Leaf-devel] Wireless PPP -> was NoCat.net

2001-07-26 Thread Mike Sensney
At 01:22 PM 07/26/2001 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote >> BTW, have you thought about what kind of cable and what length you are going >> to use? > >'Cause I have some, I figure I'll start with some thin net 10base2. If that doesn't >work, I'll call my Uncle (serious long time Ham operator) an

Re: [Leaf-devel] NoCat Net

2001-07-26 Thread Mike Sensney
At 10:54 AM 07/26/2001 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote >I saw that one. Umm, I only need 700-900 feet, so that might be a tad overkill. :) But at the bottom of the page you'll see: Use the Feed Can By Itself You can u

Re: [Leaf-devel] NoCat Net

2001-07-26 Thread Mike Sensney
At 09:22 AM 07/26/2001 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote >While researching for my wireless setup (I'm getting ready to build the antenea) I >came across their site. The WRP looks like a derivative of the LRP. I need to pull >it down and play with it to make sure. Eventually, I hope to to have

[Leaf-devel] Palm Upgrades

2001-07-19 Thread Mike Sensney
Palm Upgrades [Updated, 16:20 PDT] Empower Technologies Inc., a 30-person company based in Redmond, WA, today announced what they are calling "the world's first major operating system upgrade for Palm IIIx and IIIxe handhelds". A preliminary "demo version" of the new Linux-based OS, called Lin

[Leaf-devel] 5.25 inch SBCs

2001-07-18 Thread Mike Sensney
This company has a variety of Crusoe and socket 370 5.25" SBCs, CPU cards, 1U cases, MicroPCI cards and a number of other components. http://www.ibase-i.com.tw/products.htm

Re: [Leaf-devel] New User Interface Tool: Breakthrough!

2001-07-13 Thread Mike Sensney
At 08:37 AM 07/13/2001 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote >On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, David Douthitt wrote: > >> Hilton Travis wrote: >> >> > Are those the 8" floppy disks? > >I think the 8" floppy disks never held more than 250KB at most, anyway. IIRC the 8" SSSD disks were 250KB in size. The 8" DSDD di

Re: [Leaf-devel] Kernel stuff...

2001-07-05 Thread Mike Sensney
Weel, I have some free time and I just set up to do my own kernel compiling. So far what I have is this: I got a fresh kernel from http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.2/linux-2.2.19.tar.gz Patches from David D initrd-archive-2.2.19.diff linuxrc-always-2.2.19.diff ip_masq_vpn-2_2

RE: [Leaf-devel] Wireless routing question

2001-07-04 Thread Mike Sensney
Here is a high performance antenna built from a recycled PrimeStar dish antenna and a recycled juice can. It has about 22 dB of gain. http://www.wwc.edu/~frohro/Airport/Primestar/Primestar.html You might want to get hold of Marlon Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.odessaoffice.com/wireless/

[Leaf-devel] Watchguard Firebox 2500

2001-06-25 Thread Mike Sensney
Check this out: Watchguard Firebox 2500, only $5,438.18!!! http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.asp?EDC=299616 Anybody want to buy a LEAF box? I'll make you a deal; only $2500. 8-)

[Leaf-devel] Re: [Leaf-user] Fw: URGENT: Samba security hole

2001-06-24 Thread Mike Sensney
The only Samba packages I'm aware of are Koon Wong's. http://lrp.c0wz.com/files/kwarchive/ From the /etc/smb.conf file in smb.lrp: # Samba config file created using SWAT # from wpkgate.kc.com.my (202.184.173.241) # Date: 1999/01/30 22:26:31 # Global parameters workgroup = LINUX-GRP

[Leaf-devel] 2.2.19 kernel for 2.9.8 LRP

2001-06-24 Thread Mike Sensney
FWIW, Dave C. has announced the release of a new kernel for 2.9.8 LRP. I've attached the readme from the kernel tarball. The kernel tarball, full source code for 2.2.19, and a tarball of the patches Dave applied are all available at Dave's ftp site. ftp://ftp.linuxrouter.org/linux-router/dists

RE: [Leaf-devel] SBC computer

2001-06-22 Thread Mike Sensney
At 02:24 PM 06/22/2001 -0700, Bao C. Ha wrote >They can do Access Point with the Prism. Does >anybody knows if this is proprietary or there >is an open-source 802.11b Access Point software >available out there. This is the _only_ Access Point product that I know of that is even close to open so

Re: [Leaf-devel] Site Updates

2001-06-22 Thread Mike Sensney
At 12:20 PM 06/22/2001 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote >Mike Noyes, 2001-06-22 11:07 -0700 >>Mike & Charles, >>There is now "Mailing Lists" page in our main menu. It's not complete yet, but it >does point to our lists. I'll continue to work on it. Thanks for the suggestion. > >Everyone, >I've done my be

Re: [Leaf-devel] Site Updates

2001-06-22 Thread Mike Sensney
At 07:25 AM 06/22/2001 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote >Charles Steinkuehler, 2001-06-22 08:59 -0500 >>I just got a private e-mail regarding LRP, and in trying to include the >>leaf-user list web page in my response, I noticed: >> >>1) We don't have a mailing list link in the 'main menu' part of the leaf

[Leaf-devel] SBC computer

2001-06-21 Thread Mike Sensney
Just saw this announcement. There is a single board computer that has just been announced. Should be shipping in a couple of weeks. It has an AMD 100 MHz processor, a 10/100 port and a PCMCIA socket, 16MB RAM and 8MB flash (which may change to 32MB and 16MB before production begins). Power is

[Leaf-devel] gcc-3.0

2001-06-19 Thread Mike Sensney
For those who are interested, gcc-3.0 was released yesterday. http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.0/gcc-3.0.html

RE: [Leaf-devel] Suggestion for improvement

2001-06-15 Thread Mike Sensney
At 11:13 AM 06/15/2001 -0700, Steven Peck wrote >A LEAF box should be able to check for updates and inform its >administrator that updates are needed. > >- >I don't necessarily agree with this. Part of the appeal of a base config'd >system for me is that eve

Re: [Leaf-devel] Suggestion for improvement

2001-06-15 Thread Mike Sensney
At 09:53 AM 06/15/2001 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote >Mike Sensney, 2001-06-15 08:35 -0700 >>At 06:31 AM 06/15/2001 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote >> >>>David Douthitt, 2001-06-15 07:45 -0500 >>>>Mike Sensney wrote: >>>>> >>>>> St

Re: [Leaf-devel] Suggestion for improvement

2001-06-15 Thread Mike Sensney
Gee. And I was just thinking of simple notification, then letting the admin do the work. :-) At 10:54 AM 06/15/2001 -0500, David Douthitt wrote >Mike Sensney wrote: > >> A LEAF box should be able to check for updates and inform its administrator >> that updates are needed.

Re: [Leaf-devel] Suggestion for improvement

2001-06-15 Thread Mike Sensney
At 06:31 AM 06/15/2001 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote >David Douthitt, 2001-06-15 07:45 -0500 >>Mike Sensney wrote: >>> >>> Still, a point well taken. It probably would be wise to institute an >>> advisory list for package updates and security issues. >> >

Re: [Leaf-devel] Suggestion for improvement

2001-06-14 Thread Mike Sensney
At 12:26 PM 06/14/2001 -0500, David Douthitt wrote >Mike Sensney wrote: >> Imagine you are a Windows user. :-) > >Not hard - but now I've got VNC on my NT box and a vnc server on the >Linux box :-) > >> You have heard about firewalling, have a >> spare c

[Leaf-devel] OT National Security Agency

2001-06-14 Thread Mike Sensney
The NSA has done some security work with Linux. They refer to it as "Security-Enhanced Linux". It is an ongoing project. http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/index.html (Pulled from the web site.) = Security-Enhanced Linux Project

Re: [Leaf-devel] Suggestion for improvement

2001-06-14 Thread Mike Sensney
Imagine you are a Windows user. :-) You have heard about firewalling, have a spare computer, and want to protect your home/office network. You don't know RedHat from YellowDog and don't really care. You don't have the time to read all of the docs. You don't want to have to make all sorts of ch

Re: [Leaf-devel] LRP seems to have become a moderated list!

2001-06-13 Thread Mike Sensney
But it does get posted to the archive: http://www.linuxrouter.org/listarch/linux-router/ :-) At 01:37 AM 06/14/2001 -0400, Morgan Reed wrote >I just my leaving message and received this reply: > >Your mail to 'linux-router' with the subject > >Leaving, PCMCIA Q/A moved to LEAF > >Is being he

Re: [Leaf-devel] Hopefully last thread on LRP and leaving

2001-06-13 Thread Mike Sensney
At 01:27 AM 06/14/2001 -0400, Morgan Reed wrote >To all, > >It would appear that the LRP project itself did not get dragged into the mud >on /. or any of the major Linux sites, so in that sense it would seem Dave's >actions created nothing more than a tempest in a teapot. > >While I am still will

Re: OT Re: [Leaf-devel] linuxrouter.org

2001-06-11 Thread Mike Sensney
At 09:39 AM 06/11/2001 -0700, Kenneth Hadley wrote: >I hope that someone hacked his web server otherwise Ive lost what little >respect for Dave Cinege I had left after his fiasco with acepting help. I echo your opinion. Would Dave C feel the same if his own family had been "collateral damage"?

[Leaf-devel] The wISP Swiss Army knife

2001-06-10 Thread Mike Sensney
I saw this and thought it might be of interest. A small (7.75x8.5x3.5) 486DX-100 PC, no moving parts, FLASH, 2 wireless cards and a 10baseT NIC. It will be offered for around $800. Cheaper w/o the wireless cards... http://www.f-tech.net/wsan/wsaninfo.html

[Leaf-devel] Free Embedded Linux seminar

2001-05-23 Thread Mike Sensney
MontaVista Software is offering a free half day seminar. The subject is "Moving from a Proprietary RTOS to Embedded Linux". http://www.mvista.com/linuxinside/seminar.html It looks like it might be interesting. If you happen to be in the neighborhood you might want to check it out. (Sorry for the

Re: [Leaf-devel] Talk of names....

2001-05-22 Thread Mike Sensney
At 02:01 PM 05/22/2001 -0500, David Douthitt wrote >George Metz wrote: > > > That's a lot of wordplay in there. I think that Oxygen/2 should > actually > > be Oxygen System/2, but that's just me. =) > >I thought "/2" was copyrighted by IBM :-( IIRC numbers can't be copyrighted. That is why Intel

Re: [Leaf-devel] The Continuing Efforts of Micronization

2001-04-27 Thread Mike Sensney
>On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Mike Sensney wrote: > > > >It's easily possible, yes. The only problem I see is that there may be > > >issues where it's best left to the person building the kernel to go in > and > > >verify by hand. [...] > > &g

Re: [Leaf-devel] The Continuing Efforts of Micronization

2001-04-25 Thread Mike Sensney
At 04:44 AM 04/25/2001 -0400, George Metz wrote >On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Mike Sensney wrote: > > Would it possible to create a "base" .config then create a series of > patch > > files to modify the .config file? Would this be manageable or would it > be a > > c

Re: [Leaf-devel] The Continuing Efforts of Micronization

2001-04-24 Thread Mike Sensney
At 09:34 PM 04/23/2001 -0400, George Metz wrote >Okay. I got the basic-level kernel compiled. Here's what we have: > >-rw-r--r-- 1 wolfstar root 470k Apr 23 16:14 kernel.standard >-rw-r--r-- 1 wolfstar root 404k Apr 23 16:15 kernel.upx > >Before we get too excited, I'm stating

Re: [Leaf-devel] Netscape download problems revealed! (was: Re: [Leaf-devel] Re: CRC error on shorewall.lrp NO ERROR)

2001-04-15 Thread Mike Sensney
At 08:57 PM 04/10/2001 -0700, Ray Olszewski wrote >Cynical Microsoft >Internet Explorer, in contrast, knows full well that the world is full of >misconfigured servers, weird file extensions, and the like ... so it >applies >some sort of test to the actual bitstream it receives to decide whether i

RE: IPTables rule set WAS: RE: [Leaf-devel] just to confirm

2001-04-15 Thread Mike Sensney
At 04:46 PM 04/09/2001 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >but for now, I just want to compile a strong iptables rule set. >I've been merging rules from every how-to and alikes that I find. Have you looked at Peter Watkin's page at http://www.tux.org/~peterw/? Bastille Linux (http://www.bastille-lin

Re: [Leaf-devel] Mirrors and upcoming Oxygen CDROM

2001-04-03 Thread Mike Sensney
Hi David, My site is at http://users.owt.com/msensney/lrp and mirrored at http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/msensney/. At 06:00 PM 04/03/2001 -0500, David Douthitt wrote: >Mike Noyes wrote: > > > > David Douthitt, 2001-04-03 14:59 -0500 > > >I'm rebuilding the data CD I told you all about - and

Re: [Leaf-devel] Poll: Ladybug Architecture

2001-03-13 Thread Mike Sensney
I saw Rick Lindsley of the IBM Linux Technology Center (LTC) at a lecture last December. He had been working for Sequent for 9 years when IBM bought Sequent, formed the Linux Technology Center with the formerly Sequent programmers as the core and has turned them loose on Linux kernel development.

Re: [Leaf-devel] SourceForge ssh & website

2001-03-07 Thread Mike Sensney
I've emailed him off the list. So far no response. But he also has been silent on the WISP list since yesterday afternoon. He's probably busy.

Re: [Leaf-devel] SourceForge ssh & website

2001-03-07 Thread Mike Sensney
>Everyone, >Is anyone able to connect to our website, or ssh into shell1? Yes to both. You can't get it???

Re: [Leaf-devel] Linux based Access Point

2001-03-06 Thread Mike Sensney
There is. Comparing a wireless bridge to an AP is kind of like comparing MS-DOS to Linux. It is the extra functionality of an AP that is important for the WISP market. There are Linux and BSD folks involved in the field. If they could use wireless bridges in place of expensive APs they would. Yet

Re: [Leaf-devel] Linux based Access Point

2001-03-06 Thread Mike Sensney
No and what license they plan to use? I _think_ some version of open source. Are they going to support more that one 802.11b AP hardware vendor? ?? If they are successful, you won't need any AP hardware vendors. Just a Linux box with AP software and a wireless card. Don't forget there are 802

Re: [Leaf-devel] Linux based Access Point

2001-03-06 Thread Mike Sensney
>Mike Sensney wrote: > > > > This is from the ISP-WIRELESS list. It is regarding a project to write > > access point code for Linux. > >Having read this message and some replies, I take it that "Access Point" >means something more than what I was thin

Re: [Leaf-devel] Linux based Access Point

2001-03-06 Thread Mike Sensney
>Mike Sensney, 2001-03-06 10:16 -0800 > >This is from the ISP-WIRELESS list. It is regarding a project to write > >access point code for Linux. It is from Lonnie Nunweiler of Webworld > >Warehouse Ltd. > > > > > >Mike, >Is this the message? >http

RE: [Leaf-devel] phpWebSite

2001-03-06 Thread Mike Sensney
You obviously have way too much time on your hands. ;-) I very much approve of the look and you have my vote to make the changeover. At 04:56 AM 03/06/2001 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001-03-06 11:23 + > >I love the layout! > > > >I just don't like the some of the colours.

[Leaf-devel] Linux based Access Point

2001-03-06 Thread Mike Sensney
At this time we only have support for Infrastructure mode. I have a list of people interested in helping with the software project to build the AP code, but have not had the time to organize a project. If there is someone out there with better organizational skills, we'd love to work with them

Re: [Leaf-devel] Re: [LRP] seti@home v3.03 for lrp won't install all files...

2001-02-27 Thread Mike Sensney
BusyBox v0.28 (19990719-2233) multi-call binary -- GPL2 I don't have 2.9.8 running... At 04:24 PM 02/27/2001 -0600, David Douthitt wrote: >Probably so. Could you detail what version of busybox (tar) is on both >of these distributions? Give the output from:

Re: [Leaf-devel] bootstrapping "signed" packages

2001-02-21 Thread Mike Sensney
>i don't see without a signature file how you know the decryption >function succeeded and therefore returned a complete, authentic, >unaltered, package. (rather than returning garbage). If the decrypted file is garbage then gunzip will fail with an error code. LRP doesn't need to know why it fai

Re: [Leaf-devel] bootstrapping "signed" packages

2001-02-21 Thread Mike Sensney
>Mike Sensney wrote: > > I may be missing something, but I think Mark was thinking about some > sort > > of public/private key signature of the whole package, not the contents. > >Interesting, but what's the point? ??Not sure what you mean?? This is what Mark asked

Re: [Leaf-devel] bootstrapping "signed" packages

2001-02-21 Thread Mike Sensney
My thought is encrypt the package using a private key. That eliminates the need for a signature file. package.lrp + private key --> encrypt --> package.crp package.crp + public key --> decrypt --> package.lrp

Re: [Leaf-devel] Ladybug kernel and modules posted

2001-02-19 Thread Mike Sensney
At 07:03 AM 02/19/2001 -0800, Jack Coates wrote: >On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Is the crypto really available to release in the U.S.? Or is it > > still a dangerous thing? I asked on a mailing list a while back and > > got ZERO responses - so I removed my Oxygen kernel with

Re: [Leaf-devel] Read-only Linux IDE drivers?

2001-02-13 Thread Mike Sensney
At 05:06 PM 02/13/2001 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Has anyone ever done this? It seems like this would be a good way to >include IDE into the kernel in an embedded application, so as to >provide the utmost security. Hardware solutions appear to be non- >existant, and software solutions eit

Re: [Leaf-devel] LEAF certification

2001-02-04 Thread Mike Sensney
At 01:27 PM 02/03/2001 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote >At 12:36 PM 2/3/01 -0800, msensney@mail wrote: >>Instead, why not test our "standard" distributions against the list of >>well know Internet scanning services? For example: the WebSaint scanning >>service. Cost for a complete scan of a single work

Re: [Leaf-devel] LEAF certification

2001-02-03 Thread Mike Sensney
At 04:16 PM 02/02/2001 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote >On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 03:23:42PM -0800, Scott C. Best scribbled: > > > Okay, sure, some of the ICSA guidelines are good ones...though > > I can't imagine using anything that didn't meet them at the > > very least. > >How about this: >"Meets

Re: [Leaf-devel] Bandwidth Manager

2001-01-26 Thread Mike Sensney
>sure does look like EigerSteinBETA2 already does this with fair >queuing... more the merrier, though. It is not exactly obvious what fair queuing does or how to do other than turn it on: # Simple QoS/fair queuing support # Turn on Stochastic Fair Queueing - useful on busy DDS links - YES/

[Leaf-devel] Bandwidth Manager

2001-01-26 Thread Mike Sensney
I got to thinking that it sure would be nice to add some of this functionality to LEAF so I did some looking at FreshMeat: rshaper is a Linux kernel module that limits the incoming bandwidth for packets aimed at different hosts ("incoming" meaning traffic that enters the shaping host; if that

Re: [Leaf-devel] SF Eigerstein link

2001-01-26 Thread Mike Sensney
Copy index.htm to index.html. :) This will make Sourceforge happy and maintain backward compatibility with the mirror sites.

Re: [Leaf-devel] Mobile Linux

2001-01-19 Thread Mike Sensney
>There is supposed to be some documentation in the 2.4 kernel tarball. >linux/Documentation/filesystems/cramfs.txt Here is the file. >I think the information on ramfs is in that directory too. I didn't see it. linux/Documentation/filesystems# ls 00-INDEX adfs.txt bfs.txt cramfs.txt ext2

Re: [Leaf-devel] Mobile Linux

2001-01-19 Thread Mike Sensney
At 08:39 AM 01/19/2001 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote: >At 08:33 AM 1/19/01 -0800, Mike Sensney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>At 08:48 AM 01/18/2001 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote: >>>I just received issue 01 of elj yesterday. It has an article that >>>mentions an embedded O

Re: [Leaf-devel] Mobile Linux

2001-01-19 Thread Mike Sensney
Another reference to cramfs and ramfs: http://www.handhelds.org/minihowto/filesystems.html And source files: http://linux.mirrors.nks.net/ftp.handhelds.org/linux/compaq/ipaq/v0.15/ At 08:33 AM 01/19/2001 -0800, Mike Sensney wrote: >At 08:48 AM 01/18/2001 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote: >&

Re: [Leaf-devel] Mobile Linux

2001-01-19 Thread Mike Sensney
At 08:48 AM 01/18/2001 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote: >I just received issue 01 of elj yesterday. It has an article that mentions >an embedded OS (Mobile Linux) created by Linus. The interesting part >(quoted below) IMO is cramfs and ramfs. Has anyone seen the source for >either of these file systems

Re: [Leaf-devel] Grand New Firewall Paradigm

2001-01-16 Thread Mike Sensney
At 08:50 AM 01/16/2001 -0600, David Douthitt wrote: >On 16 Jan 2001, at 0:53, Mike Sensney wrote: > > > I would suggest some sort of watchdog feature. If the ssh link > > breaks then revert to the previous configuration. > >I don't know about LRP 2.9.4 and its descen

Re: [Leaf-devel] Grand New Firewall Paradigm

2001-01-15 Thread Mike Sensney
At 08:39 AM 01/15/2001 -0600, David Douthitt wrote: >On 14 Jan 2001, at 20:21, Scott C. Best wrote: > > > Yes, agreed. Taking this to an extreme, you could wrap a user login > > for, say, ~firewall, into a custom shell that had nothing *but* > > compiled firewall configuration commands. > > > I'm

Re: [Leaf-devel] Grand New Firewall Paradigm

2001-01-05 Thread Mike Sensney
At 01:03 PM 01/05/2001 -0800, Scott C. Best wrote: >Mike: > > > What about DNS servers? They are best referred to by IP. > > Especially if they belong to your ISP. > > Hmm. I was working with the model that the firewall >would be giving out DHCP leases to the clients on the LAN, >and acti

Re: [Leaf-devel] Grand New Firewall Paradigm

2001-01-05 Thread Mike Sensney
At 10:30 AM 01/05/2001 -0800, Scott C. Best wrote: > > Just a thought, you could extend this a little by adding: > > [SERVICE]_HOST_IP="xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx" > > [SERVICE]_HOST_NAME="host.name" > > This would add some extra design flexibility for the firewall > > maintainer but should be easy t

Re: [Leaf-devel] Grand New Firewall Paradigm

2001-01-05 Thread Mike Sensney
Most people I know tend to write code first before they even know for sure what the whole program is going to be. I do it that way myself. The program grows in fits and starts. Design decisions are put off in favor of coding the really fun parts of the program. The problem gets worse if there

Re: [Leaf-devel] Grand New Firewall Paradigm

2001-01-04 Thread Mike Sensney
At 03:52 PM 01/04/2001 -0800, Scott C. Best wrote: > First off...hello! My name is Scott Best, and I was >recently invited to this list by Mike Sensney. I hope I >can help contribute. :) Thanks for the credit, but I think it actually was Mike Noyes who invited you. :-) Gla

[Leaf-devel] The 2.4.0 kernel is officially released

2001-01-04 Thread Mike Sensney
I bet the servers are feeling the strain. :-) Read all about it: http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-01-05-001-04-NW-LF-KN ___ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/leaf-devel

Re: [Leaf-devel] Vote on web & logo entries

2001-01-04 Thread Mike Sensney
At 06:01 AM 01/04/2001 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote: >Vote totals as of this morning (Jan 4): >6 developer votes cast 11 pending > >Home page: EntryVotes > Eric Wolzak6 Another vote for Eric. >Logo: Entry Votes >tuxnet-leaflogo1.png 2 >

Re: [Leaf-devel] Grand New Firewall Paradigm

2001-01-04 Thread Mike Sensney
From the Cygwin home page: "The Cygwin tools are ports of the popular GNU development tools and utilities for Windows 95, 98, and NT. They function by using the Cygwin library which provides a UNIX-like API on top of the Win32 API." http://www.cygwin.com I loaded Cygwin on my W2K box and have

Re: [Leaf-devel] Grand New Firewall Paradim

2001-01-03 Thread Mike Sensney
Here is my attempt at restating the problem. Charles mentions the various tools in current use, like Seawall and the extended scripts and what is wrong with them. (Not easily extended and/or modified beyond their original limited purpose.) Where I see the problem is that current routing/firewa

[Leaf-devel] Small routers

2001-01-02 Thread Mike Sensney
I just saw a reference to this and thought it might be interesting enough to pass along. They are based on PC/104 architecture. They have a serial port, a 10baseT port, and between 1 and 4 PC Card slots for wireless radios. http://www.mite.cz/wireless-en/wireless-en.html

[Leaf-devel] Re: [LRP-dev] upx

2000-12-28 Thread Mike Sensney
It looks like they are actively looking at putting UPX in initrd, which would be useful for LRP. It would be a relatively small step to go from there to using UPX on all LRP packages. (tar.upx format vs. tar.gz) From a previous post: Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 14:08:39 -0800 From: John Reiser <[E

Re: [Leaf-devel] Kernel/Module relationships

2000-12-23 Thread Mike Sensney
At 03:08 AM 12/23/2000 -0500, George Metz wrote: >Random question here, which I figure maybe David, Charles, or one or two >others might have thought of. Does anyone know if, in practice, there's a >problem with using the same modules for different architectures? > >More specifically, is there goi

[Leaf-devel] Gibralter

2000-12-22 Thread Mike Sensney
I just came across this reference to a Debian based router that runs off a CD. The following is from one of the web pages. These are the minimal requirements for running Gibraltar: · Intel 486 compatible or better · 16 MB RAM (it may or may not be possible to run with 8 MB, but this

Re: [Leaf-devel] Slink ISO image

2000-12-19 Thread Mike Sensney
At 03:04 AM 12/19/2000 -0500, George Metz wrote: >On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Mike Sensney wrote: > >> The question has come up several times lately as to where to get an ISO of >> Slink. I was thinking that it may be a good idea to host the Slink ISO >> images. Would this

[Leaf-devel] Slink ISO image

2000-12-19 Thread Mike Sensney
The question has come up several times lately as to where to get an ISO of Slink. I was thinking that it may be a good idea to host the Slink ISO images. Would this use too much storage on SourceForge? I've got the Debian-2.1r4-1 and Debian-2.1r4-2 ISOs as well as the single ISO from the CheapByte

[Leaf-devel] SYN Flood DoS protection

2000-12-13 Thread Mike Sensney
I was reading Steve Gibson's site today and came across an interesting article on how he implemented SYN Flood protection for his site. http://grc.com/r&d/nomoredos.htm On the third page of the article he mentions that Dan Bernstein and Eric Schenk implemented a similar fix for Linux back in 1

[Leaf-devel] LEAF web page design

2000-12-02 Thread Mike Sensney
I've been too busy to much except reading my email. Which on another list lead me to Seattle Wireless. The whole site is in Piki Piki. You can edit the pages in place right from your browser. Check it out. http://www.seattlewireless.net/ http://www.seattlewireless.net/index.cgi/PikiPiki If nothi

  1   2   >