[Leaf-user] LAPTOP AND LPR:::

hi: I need some major help. I know some of this may sound trivial to some of you but I need to get some light. I am using a DELL laptop with 3com 3CC.. card and I have a linksys card as well. I loaded Dach 2.2.19 on the machine and added pcmcia module that I found. I backed up everything and re

Re: [Leaf-user] remote access to dachstein

Erich Titl wrote: > Hi Folks > > I have my Dachstein release up and running with 4 NIC's and would like to > be able to access and configure the box without a keyboard and screen > attached. As this may not be the standard set up the documentation lacks a > little here. I had to twiddle and play

Re: [Leaf-user] caution for kernel 2.4x . . .

On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Michael D. Schleif wrote: > > Perhaps, there are other reasons that kernel 2.4x is so slow coming to > leaf: > > > > That has been a sordid story alright. I'm reasonably happy with 2.4.13-ac8 on my servers, but I had nasty VM probl

[Leaf-user] caution for kernel 2.4x . . .

Perhaps, there are other reasons that kernel 2.4x is so slow coming to leaf: -- Best Regards, mds mds resource 888.250.3987 Dare to fix things before they break . . . Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we think

Re: [Leaf-user] upgrade router

On Wednesday 16 January 2002 18:37, Paul Rimmer wrote: > As another datapoint I get 400KB/sec download speeds with Shawcable > here in Calgary. That translates to 400 x 1000 x 8 = 3.2 Mb/s (1000 > could be 1024, not sure, so I'll pick smaller). I've pulled over 500kB/sec on a couple of occasions

[Leaf-user] Speed Survey

Tried both US dslreports speed test servers (http://www.dslreports.com/stest) from up here in Canada (Calgary, Shawcable) and got the following: >From Megapath, CA Test running.. ** Speed 2325(down)/1034(up) kbps ** (At least 46 times faster than a 56k modem) Finish. >From Linkline, LA T

Re: [Leaf-user] upgrade router

Ken: And you said I was doing some overkill ;-)  when I used my PII 400 mhz desktop machine as a test. Rob Kenneth Hadley wrote: 007201c19ef9$5655e680$[EMAIL PROTECTED]"> OS - Dachstein CD v.1.01ISP - Pacific Bell (SBC DataCom)Distance from DSLAM - 2.5 miles (roughly)Speed Test from DSLrepor

Re: [Leaf-user] upgrade router

Paul: I was running a 486dlc-40 from Cyrix, 32 megs of ram and with PPPoE and I was getting about 538kbps download. Now with the 266 mhz PII the download speed is up to 1221k ~ 1230kbps. According to the speed tests at dslreports.com. I am using Covad Telesurfer Pro connection (1500kbps/ 384

Re: [Leaf-user] upgrade router

OS - Dachstein CD v.1.01 ISP - Pacific Bell (SBC DataCom) Distance from DSLAM - 2.5 miles (roughly) Speed Test from DSLreports.com - 1187(down)/104(up) at 5:35pm (PST) System - Nickname - OverKill K6-450 64MB RAM 8x IDE CDROM Reason

RE: [Leaf-user] upgrade router

As another datapoint I get 400KB/sec download speeds with Shawcable here in Calgary. That translates to 400 x 1000 x 8 = 3.2 Mb/s (1000 could be 1024, not sure, so I'll pick smaller). That is with DCD v1.01 running on a P133 with 64MB of RAM. Until a month ago I was using a 486 DX2/66 with 16MB

RE:[Leaf-user] upgrade router

not to brag on DSL...I get 1.55 meg downloads from the local newserver with a P2-75 with 32 meg ram and dual floppy of course, the telco put a dslam less than 3000 yards from the neighborhood last year :) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:14:06 -0600 From: Robert Chambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Kenne

Re: [Leaf-user] blackholing at the ISP? how to diagnose?

Just helping with two details here: At 11:14 PM 1/16/02 +, Alex McLintock wrote: [...] >Aha! Thanks for that. Please put it in the FAQ :-) >It told me that my IP address for the laptop was 80.1.127.3, >Gateway 80.1.127.1, >DNS 194.168.4.100 >DHCP server 10.0.122.70 > >Now when I boot up my

[Leaf-user] Re: 1 very simple question

Malik, I'd suggest that you first subscribe to the lear-user list at sourceforge and second visit http://lrp.steinkuehler.net/ and check out the documentation there. Once you get the hang of it, you can apply my pcmcia downloads to an otherwise running installation, and you should find drivers fo

Re: [Leaf-user] blackholing at the ISP? how to diagnose?

On Wednesday 16 January 2002 17:14, Alex McLintock wrote: > > Good, you can open a "run..." dialog box and enter "winipcfg", > > select your Nic in the adapter box, and push the "more info" button > > to get info on your Gateway and dns server ip addresses. We'll see if we can slip it in somewher

[Leaf-user] remote access to dachstein

Hi Folks I have my Dachstein release up and running with 4 NIC's and would like to be able to access and configure the box without a keyboard and screen attached. As this may not be the standard set up the documentation lacks a little here. I had to twiddle and play with a few parameters and c

Re: [Leaf-user] blackholing at the ISP? how to diagnose?

Alex McLintock wrote: > > > On Wednesday 16 January 2002 12:30, Alex McLintock wrote: [ snip ] > --- guitarlynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > My Internet provider is NTL:Home which is a UK based cable company. I > > > know that that is working to some extent because I can get it working >

Re: [Leaf-user] blackholing at the ISP? how to diagnose?

At 2002-01-16 23:14 +, Alex McLintock wrote: >I would be greatful if someone can confirm Dachstein has worked with a >10.X.X.X external IP address. Alex, Have you looked at this FAQ in sec06? Eigerstein Series LRP will not route with private range IP Address assigned to external NIC http:/

Re: [Leaf-user] blackholing at the ISP? how to diagnose?

> On Wednesday 16 January 2002 12:30, Alex McLintock wrote: > > Comments inline: > > I am after advice because my first DachStein (floppy) installation is > > stuck. I am not getting any response from my ISP except for the > > initial DHCP > > OK, do you know this for sure? More later on th

[Leaf-user] OpenSSL and fswcert

I'm just about to set up ipsec509. All the docs seem to indicate that OpenSSL is the tool to use to set up the certs. I see that certs can be issued by a MS website, but I think the format of the certs must be changed (from DER to ???) and OpenSSL is mentioned to do the conversion. Further, fsw

[Leaf-user] Re: Leaf-user digest, Vol 1 #552 - 4 msgs

Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote the following at 21:13 16.01.2002: >--__--__-- > >Message: 2 >Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 18:30:11 + (GMT) >From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Alex=20McLintock?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [Leaf-user] blackholing at the ISP? how to diagnose? > >Hi Folks, >

Re: [Leaf-user] blackholing at the ISP? how to diagnose?

On Wednesday 16 January 2002 12:30, Alex McLintock wrote: Comments inline: > I am after advice because my first DachStein (floppy) installation is > stuck. I am not getting any response from my ISP except for the > initial DHCP OK, do you know this for sure? More later on this. > I had some

Re: [Leaf-user] blackholing at the ISP? how to diagnose?

Responses below. At 06:30 PM 1/16/02 +, Alex McLintock wrote: .. >I am after advice because my first DachStein (floppy) installation is stuck. ... >I then got DachStein DENYing absolutely everything that tried to leave the >box. Happily a document on the sourceforge site gave me a clue. It s

[Leaf-user] upgrade router

Hey Ken: Just to let you know, I just finished building a new router box. 266 mhz PII, 64 meg of ram, and two FA310 nic's. Running the floppy version of Dachstein with PPPoE. Same as we talked about before, download speeds are around 1.2 meg. Robert Chambers __

Re: [Leaf-user] blackholing at the ISP? how to diagnose?

Hi Alex, I know that my cable company has a system that the cable modem records the MAC for the connection and will not let you switch to a different NIC without calling them. In my case, there was no issue, I just told them that I got a new PC, with a new NIC - 30 seconds later I was up. Of cour

[Leaf-user] blackholing at the ISP? how to diagnose?

Hi Folks, I am after advice because my first DachStein (floppy) installation is stuck. I am not getting any response from my ISP except for the initial DHCP I had some problems getting the D-Link 528's to be recognised but that was because I thought they were tulip based (like other later D

[Leaf-user] Re: multi ip port forwarding

> Thank you for your reply charles. > but forgive me for I don't quiet understand what you mean. > Are you saying that I could only have 2 machines in my DMZ ? OR I could only > have 2 ip's bound to my eth0? I was offering an alternate network structure... > Actually I want to have as many as po

Re: [Leaf-user] ssh / openssh?

Sorry for returning to this thread almost a month after it reached a natural end. At 11:55 20/12/01 -0800, Matthew Schalit wrote: >Julian Church wrote: > > > I'm a bit confused because there seem to be two versions of sshd.lrp > > available at the moment - > > > > The one I've always used is qui

Re: [Leaf-user] Confusing packet in firewall logs

Hi Patrick At 13:06 16/01/02 +0100, Patrick Benson wrote: >Is that your model that is shown here? > >http://www.adslguide.org.uk/hardware/pictures.asp >http://www.efficientnetworks.com/products/routbus.html Yes it is, but BT supply the router with different software including no user-configura

Re: [Leaf-user] need help with port forwarding

I dont' know if you have received any reply to this yet --- I had a bit of mailbox problem yesterday, and this post doesn't seem to appear in the archives... Anyway, it appears this is a simple typo: HERE===> tcp_${EXTERN_IP}_smtp_192.168.1.1_smtp is where you port forward

Re: [Leaf-user] Confusing packet in firewall logs

Julian Church wrote: > Yeah, it's got one of those pages, but I don't access it using the address > 192.168.254.254. But I just now found that browsing to 192.168.254.254 > makes the firewall produce packets very similar to the ones I was confused > by yesterday in my logs... > > Jan 16 08:17:4

Re: [Leaf-user] Confusing packet in firewall logs

Hi Patrick, At 22:16 15/01/02 +0100, Patrick Benson wrote: >Julian Church wrote: > > I was getting several of these > > packets per minute so I think it's fair to conclude that the problem has > > been solved. So it seems pretty certain that the fault was with the router > > somehow. My guess i