Re: [leaf-user] dnscache and some akamai.net hosts not resolving

Thanks to everyone for the many replies. It appears it was dnscache. The fix for me was to set FORWARDONLY option ON and set the ISP dns server addresses (for use in FORWARDONLY). I hope this helps others. Thanks, On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 12:21 +, Erich Titl wrote: > Hi Trev > > Trev Peterso

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache and some akamai.net hosts not resolving

I encountered the same problem about a year+ ago but for different websites, though I'm only running Dachstein. I got tired of dealing with it and put my ISP's dns as the dhcpd distribution. Trev Peterson wrote: >Hello, > >I'm having a bit of a problem with dnscache. If anyone has run into >

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache and some akamai.net hosts not resolving

Hi on 26.8.2008 04:17 Trev Peterson wrote: > I'm having a bit of a problem with dnscache. If anyone has run into > this problem and/or has a suggested solution it would be greatly > appreciated. > Firewall Version: Leaf Bering 2.4.32 > Package Name: dnscache.lrp > Description: Some hosts are no

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache and some akamai.net hosts not resolving

Hi Trev Trev Peterson wrote: > Hello, > > I'm having a bit of a problem with dnscache. If anyone has run into > this problem and/or has a suggested solution it would be greatly > appreciated. I should note we are not interested in changing to another > package (we use tinydns extensively and ar

[leaf-user] dnscache and some akamai.net hosts not resolving

Hello, I'm having a bit of a problem with dnscache. If anyone has run into this problem and/or has a suggested solution it would be greatly appreciated. I should note we are not interested in changing to another package (we use tinydns extensively and are otherwise happy with dnscache). Below a

[leaf-user] dnscache

Hello LEAF friends, can some one tell me why my dnscache don't work if I run my Bering on a computer without a Networkcard? I use ISDN for connect to the internet thanks in advance sayangoin _ Holen Sie sich den neuen

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache inconsistent

changed to dnsmasq and have not gotten any more complaints. Hope this helps, - Original Message - From: "Nathan Angelacos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ALParada" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 10:07 AM Subject: Re: [leaf-user] dnscache

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache inconsistent

Thanks for the info. Installed and configured dnsmasq and seems to be working well. I did had some problems getting it to respond on only one interface but it looks like it worked itself out. Thanks > ALParada wrote: > > >Hello, > > > >I'm having problems with what I think can only be dnscache.

[leaf-user] dnscache inconsistent

Hello, I'm having problems with what I think can only be dnscache. I am using uClibc 2.1.0 with Shorewall and Openvpn. Dnscache is setup to forward to my internal DNS. Openvpn is setup to use dnscache as the primary dns on the config file. Somtimes it simply doesn't resolve. I have tried it from t

RE: [leaf-user] Dnscache uses external interface to send queries

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello everyone. > > Can anyone tell me how I can configure dnscache to send its requests > using the internal interface. For some reason it has chosen the > external interface to send out the requests, but that interface won't > work with my > IPSEC connection. I am no

[leaf-user] Dnscache uses external interface to send queries

Hello everyone. Can anyone tell me how I can configure dnscache to send its requests using the internal interface. For some reason it has chosen the external interface to send out the requests, but that interface won't work with my IPSEC connection. I am not sure why it is picking that interface

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache

MAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 8:31 PM Subject: Re: [leaf-user] dnscache > At 06:52 PM 11/7/2003 -0500, ALParada wrote: > >There is no record for the LRP in the primary DNS. Now that I added one > >and the associated PTR it works. However, why did it work with th

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache

At 06:52 PM 11/7/2003 -0500, ALParada wrote: There is no record for the LRP in the primary DNS. Now that I added one and the associated PTR it works. However, why did it work with the ISP DNS servers? Beats me. Ask your ISP. Me, I can only *guess* that the ISP did something to its DNS servers that

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache

TECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 4:13 PM Subject: Re: [leaf-user] dnscache > Offnhand, I do not see a cause for this problem, now that I understand it a > bit better. I'll give it some additional thought, though. In the meantime, > could I ask you to clarify one detail?

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache

Offnhand, I do not see a cause for this problem, now that I understand it a bit better. I'll give it some additional thought, though. In the meantime, could I ask you to clarify one detail? If you tell the test host to use 192.168.63.11 as its DNS server, can nslookup then do a reverse lookup o

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache

See below. - Original Message - From: "Ray Olszewski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "ALParada" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 1:38 PM Subject: Re: [leaf-user] dnscache > Sorry to be coming into this one late.

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache

MAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 8:28 AM Subject: RE: [leaf-user] dnscache > Nothing in your config sounds incorrect, but here is what I did: > > 1. change LRP box internal IP > 2. Changed querying hosts IP (actually this may be the default, bu

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache

t;Robert K Coffman Jr - Info From Data Corporation" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ALParada" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 8:28 AM Subject: RE: [leaf-user] dnscache > Nothing in your config sounds incorrect, but here is wha

RE: [leaf-user] dnscache

Coffman -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of ALParada Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 8:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [leaf-user] dnscache Hello, I am running Bering with dnscache. Either I don't understand how a caching server

[leaf-user] dnscache

Hello, I am running Bering with dnscache. Either I don't understand how a caching server works, or I missed something in the configuration. Dnscache is running because I verified it with "ps aux". I however can't resolve any names. I changed the internal ip address under option1. Set option 4 to y

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache ??

On Monday 16 December 2002 09:10 pm, you wrote: > First, thanks to all who contributed to the development of LEAF. The > various packages just keep getting better. > > Now to my question. Recently, I moved from Dachstein to Bering. After doing > this I noticed that the images at www.weather.com do

[leaf-user] dnscache ??

First, thanks to all who contributed to the development of LEAF. The various packages just keep getting better. Now to my question. Recently, I moved from Dachstein to Bering. After doing this I noticed that the images at www.weather.com do not display. The reason they do not display is dnscache i

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

> > I'd suggest configuring dnscache to listen on the 64.4.197.65 IP for > > your DMZ hosts. You can setup a second dnscache to listen on > > 192.168.1.254 for your internal network. The two tinydns instances can > > be run on loopback interfaces (there's more than just 127.0.0.1 > > available, r

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > > > > > 17: wan1: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen > 100 > > > > link/ppp > > > > inet 64.4.222.157 peer 64.4.222.158/32 scope global wan1 > > > > inet 64.4.197.99/32 scope global wan1 > > > > inet 64.4.197.100/32 scope global wan1 > > > > inet 64.

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > So...it looks like either dnscache is mis-configured (bad send-from IP), > or more likely, that your masquerade rule connecting the internal > network with the DMZ is mangling (masquerading) the return traffic. Why am I thinking about correcting the error and dnsc

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

> > > 17: wan1: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100 > > > link/ppp > > > inet 64.4.222.157 peer 64.4.222.158/32 scope global wan1 > > > inet 64.4.197.99/32 scope global wan1 > > > inet 64.4.197.100/32 scope global wan1 > > > inet 64.4.197.101/32 scope global wan1 > > > > Please

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

> > > # ping -c 3 64.4.197.127 > > > PING 64.4.197.127 (64.4.197.127): 56 data bytes > > > 64 bytes from 64.4.197.65: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=0.3 ms > > > 64 bytes from 64.4.197.69: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=0.7 ms (DUP!) > > > 64 bytes from 64.4.197.68: icmp_seq=0 ttl=128 time=0.9 ms (DUP!) > > > 64

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

> OK, it gets more interesting ;> Indeed! Lots of in-line comments, or just skip to the "executive summary" at the end :-) > [3] As it turns out, some name resolution stuff works (e.g., nslookup); > but, other stuff does *NOT* work (e.g., host, dig, ping). tcpdump > output is here: >

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > > Comments inline. > > > Yes, I, too, have been confused by some of this. We have several > > successful proxy-arp dmz's; so, when we built this one, we started by > > cloning those other config's and changing addresses, &c. and it > appeared > > to be working as e

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

Comments inline. > Yes, I, too, have been confused by some of this. We have several > successful proxy-arp dmz's; so, when we built this one, we started by > cloning those other config's and changing addresses, &c. and it appeared > to be working as expected. > > # ip route > 64.4.222.158 dev ips

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

Thank you, for your participation . . . Ray Olszewski wrote: > > Sorry to jump into this late. > > You say: > > >[4] I need help understanding what is going on in lines like this: > > > >64.4.197.69 > 64.4.197.65: icmp: 64.4.197.69 udp port 32868 > > unreachable [tos 0xc0] > > > >

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

Sorry to jump into this late. You say: [4] I need help understanding what is going on in lines like this: 64.4.197.69 > 64.4.197.65: icmp: 64.4.197.69 udp port 32868 unreachable [tos 0xc0] I am confused with both icmp and udp specified on same line ??? I believe what this reports

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

OK, it gets more interesting ;> [1] As you know, here is a summary of the dcd: root@bluetrout:/etc # ip addr . . . 7: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100 link/ether 00:a0:c9:9e:57:70 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.1.254/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

Thank you, Charles, et al. for your continued participation . . . Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > > > root@bluetrout:/root > > # ip addr > > . . . > > 7: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100 > > link/ether 00:a0:c9:9e:57:70 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > > inet 192.168.1.254/24 brd 192.168.1

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

Michael D. Schleif wrote: Matthew Schalit wrote: Please tell me you've added ipchains -l logging to every packet 1) inbound on dmz nic 2) outbound from dmz nic 3) inbound on internal nic 4) outbound on internal nic 5) forwarded by any forward rule

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

Michael D. Schleif wrote: How about you tell me what ip tinydns-public is bound to? ==>cat /etc/tinydns-public/env/IP How about what ip is dnscache bound to? ==>cat /etc/dnscache/env/IP # cat /etc/tinydns-public/env/IP 64.4.197.65 # cat /etc/dnscache/env/IP 0.0.0.0 I've not

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

Brad Fritz wrote: > On Fri, 11 Oct 2002 09:26:54 EST mds wrote: > I still think using two instances of dnscache in front of two > instances of tinydns would be a cleaner solution if you need > separate DMZ and LAN namespaces. Otherwise you might end up > in routing kludge hell getting this to w

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

On Fri, 11 Oct 2002 09:26:54 EST mds wrote: > I'm beginning to believe that this maybe the problem. Remember, I > witness the queries in dnscache and witness the answers sent; but, > nothing gets back to dmz. Are you sure? Snippets from the ipchains logs you posted [c] 59:52 output - eth1 P

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

> root@bluetrout:/root > # ip addr > 7: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100 > link/ether 00:a0:c9:9e:57:70 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet 192.168.1.254/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global eth0 > 8: eth1: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100 > link/ether 00:a0:c9:9e:64:83 brd ff:ff:

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > > > > I think Charles hit the nail on the head when he said: > > > > > > cs> You have to point the DMZ systems at the IP of dnscache, *NOT* > tinydns, > > > cs> as tinydns does not do recursive queries. I think that's the > root of > > > cs> your problem. Switch t

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

> > I think Charles hit the nail on the head when he said: > > > > cs> You have to point the DMZ systems at the IP of dnscache, *NOT* tinydns, > > cs> as tinydns does not do recursive queries. I think that's the root of > > cs> your problem. Switch the IP in your non-working DMZ resolv.conf to th

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

Brad Fritz wrote: > > On or before Wed, 09 Oct 2002 11:06:30 EST mds and Charles S wrote: > > mds> I cannot get dmz hosts to resolve addresses for remote internet > mds> sites solely via tinydns-public and dnscache ;< tinydns tries to > mds> resolve the name and gives up, without so much as as

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

On or before Wed, 09 Oct 2002 11:06:30 EST mds and Charles S wrote: mds> I cannot get dmz hosts to resolve addresses for remote internet mds> sites solely via tinydns-public and dnscache ;< tinydns tries to mds> resolve the name and gives up, without so much as asking dnscache. [other details

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

"Michael D. Schleif" wrote: > > Matthew Schalit wrote: > > > > > Please tell me you've added ipchains -l logging to every packet > > 1) inbound on dmz nic > > 2) outbound from dmz nic > > 3) inbound on internal nic > > 4) outbound on internal nic > >

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

Matthew Schalit wrote: > Please tell me you've added ipchains -l logging to every packet > 1) inbound on dmz nic > 2) outbound from dmz nic > 3) inbound on internal nic > 4) outbound on internal nic > 5) forwarded by any forward rule > > and r

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

"Michael D. Schleif" wrote: > > Matthew Schalit wrote: > > Do you forward and masq from the dmz to internal or just forward? > > Have you posted all the rules you're using for that? > > this could be it: > > this page will update

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

Matthew Schalit wrote: > > Michael D. Schleif wrote: > > thank you, for your continued interest . . . > > > > Matthew Schalit wrote: > > > >>Michael D. Schleif wrote: > >> > >>>"Michael D. Schleif" wrote: > >>> > >>> > does anybody have a proxy-arp dmz and also running tinydns & dnscache? >

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

Michael D. Schleif wrote: > thank you, for your continued interest . . . > > Matthew Schalit wrote: > >>Michael D. Schleif wrote: >> >>>"Michael D. Schleif" wrote: >>> >>> does anybody have a proxy-arp dmz and also running tinydns & dnscache? >>> >>>Anybody have such setup that works? >> >>I

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

thank you, for your continued interest . . . Matthew Schalit wrote: > > Michael D. Schleif wrote: > > "Michael D. Schleif" wrote: > > > >>does anybody have a proxy-arp dmz and also running tinydns & dnscache? > > > > Anybody have such setup that works? > > I have three nics in Bering rc3 > >

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

Michael D. Schleif wrote: > "Michael D. Schleif" wrote: > >>does anybody have a proxy-arp dmz and also running tinydns & dnscache? > > > Anybody have such setup that works? > I have three nics in Bering rc3 eth1 10.10.10.0/24 + tinydns private + dnscach

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 15:07, Michael D. Schleif wrote: > > "Michael D. Schleif" wrote: > > > > does anybody have a proxy-arp dmz and also running tinydns & dnscache? > > Anybody have such setup that works? Yes, on Dachstein 1.0.2CD, BUT tinydns and dnscache only serve the private network. I ha

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

"Michael D. Schleif" wrote: > > does anybody have a proxy-arp dmz and also running tinydns & dnscache? Anybody have such setup that works? -- Best Regards, mds mds resource 888.250.3987 Dare to fix things before they break . . . Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > > > > >does anybody have a proxy-arp dmz and also running tinydns & > dnscache? > > > > > > > >thought that I'd resolved this sometime ago; but, tonight, for life > of > > > >me, I cannot get dmz hosts to resolve addresses for remote internet > > > >sites solely via

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

> > >does anybody have a proxy-arp dmz and also running tinydns & dnscache? > > > > > >thought that I'd resolved this sometime ago; but, tonight, for life of > > >me, I cannot get dmz hosts to resolve addresses for remote internet > > >sites solely via tinydns-public and dnscache ;< tinydns tries

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

Erich Titl wrote: > > At 07:57 09.10.2002, you wrote: > > >does anybody have a proxy-arp dmz and also running tinydns & dnscache? > > > >thought that I'd resolved this sometime ago; but, tonight, for life of > >me, I cannot get dmz hosts to resolve addresses for remote internet > >sites solely

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

Michael At 07:57 09.10.2002, you wrote: >does anybody have a proxy-arp dmz and also running tinydns & dnscache? > >thought that I'd resolved this sometime ago; but, tonight, for life of >me, I cannot get dmz hosts to resolve addresses for remote internet >sites solely via tinydns-public and dnsc

[leaf-user] dnscache vs. dmz ???

does anybody have a proxy-arp dmz and also running tinydns & dnscache? thought that I'd resolved this sometime ago; but, tonight, for life of me, I cannot get dmz hosts to resolve addresses for remote internet sites solely via tinydns-public and dnscache ;< tinydns tries to resolve the name and

Re: [leaf-user] DnsCache

H. D. Lee wrote: > On 2002.09.24_21:26:59_+, Sean wrote: > >>I'm using Dachstein. TinyDNS is on the CD. Guess I'll try to set it >>up. Thanks for the pointers! Another question: Is this a GOOD IDEA? >>It can be done, but should it be done? >> > > > Depends on what you and your users ne

Re: [leaf-user] DnsCache

On 2002.09.24_21:26:59_+, Sean wrote: > I'm using Dachstein. TinyDNS is on the CD. Guess I'll try to set it > up. Thanks for the pointers! Another question: Is this a GOOD IDEA? > It can be done, but should it be done? > Depends on what you and your users needs. On some sites I worked o

RE: [leaf-user] DnsCache

H. D. Lee Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 8:27 PM To: Leaf-User Subject: Re: [leaf-user] DnsCache On 2002.09.24_19:27:55_+, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is there any way to pre-load the dnscache with some > entries? Like telling it that *.doubleclick.* and > *.x10.* are 127.0.0.1?

Re: [leaf-user] DnsCache

On 2002.09.24_19:27:55_+, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is there any way to pre-load the dnscache with some > entries? Like telling it that *.doubleclick.* and > *.x10.* are 127.0.0.1? > As Charles and Britz suggested, use tinydns and dnscache to achieve that. Please also note that to run ti

Re: [leaf-user] DnsCache

> Is there any way to pre-load the dnscache with some > entries? Like telling it that *.doubleclick.* and > *.x10.* are 127.0.0.1? Not exactly...you can, however, setup a DNS server for those domains (see, for instance, tinydns), and configure dnscache to query the local name-server for those do

Re: [leaf-user] DnsCache

On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 19:27:55 GMT Sean wrote: > Is there any way to pre-load the dnscache with some > entries? Like telling it that *.doubleclick.* and > *.x10.* are 127.0.0.1? Yes, it's called tinydns. ;) In a nutshell, the setup for that you describe on Bering rc3 is: 1.) Install tinydns.

[leaf-user] DnsCache

Is there any way to pre-load the dnscache with some entries? Like telling it that *.doubleclick.* and *.x10.* are 127.0.0.1? TIA Sean --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf -

[leaf-user] dnscache question

Does anyone know why dnscache doesn't? If the ppp0 interface is down it will not resolve an address. Is this normal? Is there a way to change this? Antony Briggs --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board for

Re: [leaf-user] Dnscache error mesage

Le Jeudi 25 Juillet 2002 21:59, Godfried Duodu a écrit : > Can I make the syst_size much bigger siNCE i HAVE 64m RAM? Sure but you need to leave room for /var/log and /tmp and you also need some memory to run linux :-) Go for 16M it should be more than enough Jacques > Le Jeudi 25 Juillet 2002

Re: [leaf-user] Dnscache error mesage

Can I make syst_size much bigger since i have 64M ram? Godfried Duodu (713)802-5146 fax # (713}802-5140 >>> Jacques Nilo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 7/25/02 1:24:33 PM >>> Le Jeudi 25 Juillet 2002 18:46, Godfried Duodu a écrit : > I have enabled dnscache on my Bering-rc3 floppy version. When the syste

Re: [leaf-user] Dnscache error mesage

Le Jeudi 25 Juillet 2002 18:46, Godfried Duodu a écrit : > I have enabled dnscache on my Bering-rc3 floppy version. When the system > comes, up I get beau coup of the following message: "Unable to write to > dnscache/supervise/status.new: Out of disk space". I transferred the > installation to a

[leaf-user] Dnscache error mesage

I have enabled dnscache on my Bering-rc3 floppy version. When the system comes, up I get beau coup of the following message: "Unable to write to dnscache/supervise/status.new: Out of disk space". I transferred the installation to a hard disk and still getting the messages. I am even able to lo

Re: [leaf-user] dnscache: fatal: $IP not set

Le Vendredi 17 Mai 2002 21:06, Jim Van Eeckhoutte a écrit : > Im running bering rc1 with dnscache. Installed per nilo site instructions, > no problems. But when i enter dnscache at prompt i get dnscache: fatal: $IP > not set. What could be causing this also cant see any logs generated > from

[leaf-user] dnscache: fatal: $IP not set

Im running bering rc1 with dnscache. Installed per nilo site instructions, no problems. But when i enter dnscache at prompt i get dnscache: fatal: $IP not set. What could be causing this also cant see any logs generated from dnscache to verify that it is even working. __

[Leaf-user] Dnscache configuration on DCD 1.02

Hi, I was reading dnscache documentation and I wanted it to resolve internal addresses using our internal DNS server. In http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/faq/cache.html it reads: How do I tell my cache to consult internal DNS servers? Our network has internal servers at IP addresses 10.1.2.5 and 10.1.2.

[Leaf-user] dnscache/tinydns for dhcp aquired dns servers

Hi, I have a question I hope someone can help me with. Here goes: I'm running dachstein on a 1722K floppy, with dhclient.lrp, dhcpd.lrp, daemontl.lrp, tinydns.lrp and dnscache.lrp. Currently I'm in the testing phase, but I hope to use this setup in a couple of situations soon. Question: DMAC

Re: [Leaf-user] DNScache and hosts config question

At 10:37 PM 3/9/02 +, Scott C. Best wrote: >Michael: > > Heya. Each of the LAN machines gets a DHCP lease >from the DS box, with the DS box indicated as the DNS >server. Only the DS box has the /etc/hosts entries. > For example, in the /etc/hosts file it reads: > >192.168.123.1 pc

Re: [Leaf-user] DNScache and hosts config question

Scott C. Best wrote: > Heyaz. So I'm using a fairly stock DS relase, > and I've a question about properly setting up dnscache > and my "host" entries in network.conf. > Scott! I hope all is well in the South Bay. Are you going to make it up to SF for the Linux Embedded conference this we

Re: [Leaf-user] DNScache and hosts config question

Michael: Heya. Each of the LAN machines gets a DHCP lease from the DS box, with the DS box indicated as the DNS server. Only the DS box has the /etc/hosts entries. For example, in the /etc/hosts file it reads: 192.168.123.1 pc.private.network pc1 192.168.123.2 winnt.priv

Re: [Leaf-user] DNScache and hosts config question

"Scott C. Best" wrote: > > Heyaz. So I'm using a fairly stock DS relase, > and I've a question about properly setting up dnscache > and my "host" entries in network.conf. So, these host entries are visible from the DS system. > How can I keep my LAN machines from making PTR? >

[Leaf-user] DNScache and hosts config question

Heyaz. So I'm using a fairly stock DS relase, and I've a question about properly setting up dnscache and my "host" entries in network.conf. How can I keep my LAN machines from making PTR? requests to my ISP's DNS when trying to get host names for internal LAN machines? I've setup

[Leaf-user] dnscache visible from DMZ ???

Is dnscache usable from the DMZ? Any special setup? -- Best Regards, mds mds resource 888.250.3987 Dare to fix things before they break . . . Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . . ___

Re: [Leaf-user] dnscache & w2k servers ???

Not sure if this makes any difference in your situation, but Win2k does client-side DNS caching (and negative caching, I believe) To disable for testing: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q245437 ___ Leaf-user mailing list [EMAIL

[Leaf-user] dnscache & w2k servers ???

Normally, we've been setting up all systems with dhcp and assigning dns servers thusly: 192.168.1.254 # firewall, w/dnscache x.y.z.2 # ISP assigned dns server(s) x.y.z.3 ... I suppose, our theory is, if dnscache gets trashed, at least dns querie

Re: [Leaf-user] dnscache Dachstein 1.0.1 "LRP Box internal IP"

Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > > > > Under Package configuration - dnscache there is a menu entry called "LRP > box > > > internal IP (default: 192.168.1.254). > > > But if I open menu entry 1) there is not "192.168.1.254", it's > "0.0.0.0". > > > > > > What's correct now? Is the menu entry descri

Re: [Leaf-user] dnscache Dachstein 1.0.1 "LRP Box internal IP"

> > Under Package configuration - dnscache there is a menu entry called "LRP box > > internal IP (default: 192.168.1.254). > > But if I open menu entry 1) there is not "192.168.1.254", it's "0.0.0.0". > > > > What's correct now? Is the menu entry description wrong or the value itself? > > One must

Re: [Leaf-user] dnscache Dachstein 1.0.1 "LRP Box internal IP"

Jacques Nilo wrote: > > Sandro Minola wrote: > > > hi > > > > Under Package configuration - dnscache there is a menu entry called "LRP box > > internal IP (default: 192.168.1.254). > > But if I open menu entry 1) there is not "192.168.1.254", it's "0.0.0.0". > > > > What's correct now? Is the me

Re: [Leaf-user] dnscache Dachstein 1.0.1 "LRP Box internal IP"

Sandro Minola wrote: > hi > > Under Package configuration - dnscache there is a menu entry called "LRP box > internal IP (default: 192.168.1.254). > But if I open menu entry 1) there is not "192.168.1.254", it's "0.0.0.0". > > What's correct now? Is the menu entry description wrong or the value i

[Leaf-user] dnscache Dachstein 1.0.1 "LRP Box internal IP"

hi Under Package configuration - dnscache there is a menu entry called "LRP box internal IP (default: 192.168.1.254). But if I open menu entry 1) there is not "192.168.1.254", it's "0.0.0.0". What's correct now? Is the menu entry description wrong or the value itself? One must be wrong. I entere

RE: [Leaf-user] dnscache and nslookup

> Thanks all, for the responses on and off the list. I guess I'll try > setting up tinydns. It just seemed strange to me that > nslookup needed to > do a reverse name lookup on the name server ip address in > order to run > at all. > > -Steve > "nslookup produces a daft error message because it is

Re: [Leaf-user] dnscache and nslookup

server packages available for LRP - 2 > that come to mind are bind and tinydns. Most people recommend tinydns > if I'm not mistaken - due to security vulnerablilties and performance > issues with bind. > > Simon > > > >> From: Steven Cayford <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [Leaf-user] dnscache and nslookup

come to mind are bind and tinydns. Most people recommend tinydns if I'm not mistaken - due to security vulnerablilties and performance issues with bind. Simon >From: Steven Cayford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [Leaf-use

[Leaf-user] dnscache and nslookup

Hi. I'm enjoying setting up a 486 with Oxygen as a router for my home network. I wanted to set up dnscache on the machine since my isp's name servers seem kind of slow sometimes and that seems to work pretty well. For the internal side I just listed my machines (only two of them so far, more later

Re: [Leaf-user] DNSCACHE

Robert Chambers wrote: > Somebody on the list suggested that I should use DNS Cache on my LRP. > Because to get my Linux box to connect to the outside world, I must > edit my resolv.confg file and add two nameservers that are provided from > my ISP. > Ok I found a copy of dnscache.lrp. How do I

[Leaf-user] DNSCACHE

Somebody on the list suggested that I should use DNS Cache on my LRP. Because to get my Linux box to connect to the outside world, I must edit my resolv.confg file and add two nameservers that are provided from my ISP. Ok I found a copy of dnscache.lrp. How do I install it back into the Eige