I am again having relationship problems with the database.
Bad enough that the relationship that shows in Family View and o Pedigree
View are not the direct relationship but the closest relationship. Many
agree with me that THAT should be the default or, at the VERY least, an
option!
However, I
-Original Message-
From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
Of CE Wood
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 2:31 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Relationships not working - AGAIN
I am again having relationship problems
] On Behalf
Of CE Wood
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 2:31 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Relationships not working - AGAIN
I am again having relationship problems with the database.
Bad enough that the relationship that shows in Family View and o Pedigree
View
...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
Of Robert Carneal USA
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 3:56 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships not working - AGAIN
I have to admit I do not know why this occurring for you. But do you feel up
to doing
.
John S. Adams
Hermosa Beach, CA
--
From: CE Wood wood...@msn.com
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 2:31 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Relationships not working - AGAIN
I am again having relationship problems
Jenny, didn't need to rename the event, just pick event and then
relationship. Works great now. Thanks.
Elsie
- Original Message -
From: Jenny M Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 6:27 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG
- Original Message -
From: Tracy Skegg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 12:42 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships
Elsie,
Your Relationship event can be viewed on the Family View screen,
right
click to the left of the screen
Elsie Saar wrote
How can I tell Legacy to use my event Relationship for this field
instead of its relationship calculator?
Do I have to rename this event before I bring the database over to 7? I
Legacy is confused between its own use of the word Relationship (which
shows relationships of
Many thanks to Jenny, Tracy, and Linda for setting me straight. Didn't
think to look for Event first!
Elsie
- Original Message -
From: Elsie Saar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 8:34 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Relationships
I
Elsie,
Your Relationship event can be viewed on the Family View screen, right
click to the left of the screen where the labels are eg born, died,
buried - 'Customise Family View Information' box will display. Pick
one of the field names (when I view something different to the default
I usually
Running latest version of Legacy, just went thru all of the database
repair-cleanup-compact etc.
On family view, for one of my Great Grandfathers, left side shows Great
Granduncle, which is correct.
Right side shows Wife of 1st Cousin, Twice Removed.
Any suggestions?
Art Seddon
Legacy User
://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/%7Ewendyh65/
- Original Message -
*From:* Art Seddon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*To:* LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
*Sent:* 04/20/2008 11:58:24 AM +1200
*Subject:* [LegacyUG] Relationships
Running latest version of Legacy, just went thru all of the database
repair
Did you redo the procedure: Tools/ Set Relationships? Is the wife
married more than once?
Richard
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Art Seddon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running latest version of Legacy, just went thru all of the database
repair-cleanup-compact etc.
On family view, for one of my
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Art
Seddon
Sent: Sunday, 20 April 2008 9:28 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Relationships
Running latest version of Legacy, just went thru all of the database
repair-cleanup-compact etc.
On family view, for one of my Great
: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships
Hi Art,
You may need to re-set the relationships. Go to the person you want
labelled as Self, then click on Tools Set Relationships.
Hope this helps. :-)
Kind Regards,
Wendy Howard
--
Kaiwaka, Northland, New Zealand
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com
Is it possible to produce reports for a selected individual which lists a
specific relationship ? Such as
All uncles of Selected Individual
All cousins of Selected Individual
All in-laws of Selected Individual
etc
Frank Cottier
Napanee, Ontario, Canada
Have you unlocked the
/fergys/
_
From: Francis Cottier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Relationships
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 10:48:41 -0400
Is it possible
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Francis
Cottier
Sent: 26 August 2007 15:49
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Relationships
Is it possible to produce reports for a selected individual which lists a
specific relationship ? Such as
All uncles of Selected Individual
All
Thank you, Graham. My goodness, Legacy capabilities just keep getting better
and better. Thank goodness some of you have experimented with various features
so you can pass them on to the rest of us.
Ruth A. (Sconza Testa) Nerud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can produce a sortable or searchable list
I have more than 50,000 individuals in my legacy file. Thus, some of this
persons are not showing a relationship, but I refer to them as non-marked
branches as they are not within the standard relationships of my families.
These individuals have marked into the family, or come to the family lines
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2007 5:27 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Relationships - Outside of Standard Legacy Relationships
I have more than 50,000 individuals in my legacy file. Thus, some of this
persons are not showing a relationship, but I refer to them
Legacy deluxe does this very nicely.
Purchase the Deluxe version and it will save your flustration.
Chap
On 4/7/07, Dick Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have more than 50,000 individuals in my legacy file. Thus, some of this
persons are not showing a relationship, but I refer to them as
the relationship is if it is not
obvious.
Hope this helps,
Russ Strong
- Original Message -
From: Dick Davis
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2007 2:27 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Relationships - Outside of Standard Legacy Relationships
I have
Hi Dick,
Is there a standard way of describing someone's relationship to you
when they are the eg the cousin of your second cousin's
sister-in-law? You'd all be linked in the one tree but have no blood
link so they show in Legacy as having no relationship when you are
the source person.
You can change the words on a case by case basis, on
Marriage Information screen. This is not a morality
thing but a relational thing. And a programming thing.
Rich
--- Adrian Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi
My brother lives with a woman, they are not married
but she still shows as
my
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RICHARD
SCHULTHIES
Sent: 19 October 2006 17:08
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] relationships
You can change the words on a case by case basis, on
Marriage Information screen. This is not a morality
thing but a relational thing
Hi Susan,
Sometimes you have to reset the Direct Line after you've added more ancestors.
If you've forgotten how:
Highlight yourself, then Tools Set Direct Line as preferred
Same goes for Apply Ancestor Colours
For others: If you don't see the Ancestor Colours or the bolding -
check your
Thank you, Cathy. That worked fine.
Susan
Sydney
Researching; Pegrum, Haggis, Pearman, Crawford, Aitchison, Armstrong,
Mewburn, Whitelaw, Foley, Rafferty, Elliott, Frost, Golding, Lewry
Sometimes you have to reset the Direct Line after you've added more
ancestors. If you've forgotten how:
Hi
My brother lives with a woman, they are not married but she still shows as
my sister in law, she is not. Also my Daughters boyfriend, shows as my son
in law. He's not. Can I do anything about it.
Thanks
Ady
Legacy User Group guidelines can be found at:
Ady,
I don't know if this will work...but have you tried setting the relationship
to never married?
Jon Raymond
St Paul Park, MN
Web site: http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~raymond/
Legacy User Group guidelines can be found at:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
To
Melanie
Thanks for the note re this bug. Although I had vague recollections of
messages on the subject earlier, I was unable to find the archive site.
Looking forward to another great response from support.
John
Upper Hutt
New Zealand
Legacy User Group guidelines can be found at:
I have seem to have lost some relationship titles where the relationship
is not displayed in the family view window although I have carried out each
of the file maintenance operations and re-run set relationships.
However when I run the relationship calculator tool the report correctly
identifies
John,
I have reported this bug and support already
knows about it.
Melanie Armstrong
--- John Groome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have seem to have lost some relationship titles
where the relationship
is not displayed in the family view window although
I have
@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships Calculator
I just reviewed the bug report list for Relationships
We have the following outstanding issues for the Relationship Calculator:
# 716 If the two people selected in the Relationship Calculator are in a
direct line
@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 8:54 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships Calculator
In the report i received of this error for set relationships, which
calculates the on screen display of relationships, the user indicated
that the relationship calculator is working correctly
I just checked my version 110. It shows the half relationships correctly.
Foxy
Original Message Follows
Something is different. I have version 110, and I am seeing the half
labels.
-Original Message-
My 2nd Great Grandfather married twice. When I view him on the Family
] Relationships Calculator
Something is different. I have version 110, and I am seeing the half
labels.
Robert
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jenny M
Benson
Sent: 2006-08-29 05:40
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG
to recalculate until the problem is fixed as I will lose a lot of
information that I use regularly
Jack
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Brian/Support
Sent: 30 August 2006 00:10
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of
Brian/Support
Sent: 30 August 2006 00:10
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships Calculator
This problem with the set relationships not
calculating
half-relationships in the new build has been
recorded in our bug
: [LegacyUG] Relationships Calculator
Jack,
I wish I would have left my relationships alone
after the update but I wasn't thinking and
recalculated them all and I took out all of the half relations to me
thinking they were no relation to me because they were no longer marked
where I could see
Restoring a backup should bring them back - both the relationships as
previously set and the people you've taken out - do you mean deleted?
Cathy
At 06:29 AM 31/08/2006, you wrote:
Jack,
I wish I would have left my relationships alone
after the update but I wasn't thinking and
@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships Calculator
John,
Have you selected to show 1/2 siblings on the Family screen. I have
the latest build and this part works correctly for me. On the
relationships issue, is it possible you're
Hello Renee,
To show 1/2
siblings:-
In the family view, right click on a child's name,
click 'view', and make sure 'show 1/2 kids' is ticked.
Cheers,
Jill
Legacy User Group guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
To find past messages, please go to our
jmglover wrote
To show 1/2 siblings:-
In the family view, right click on a child's name, click 'view', and
make sure 'show 1/2 kids' is ticked.
Renee specifically said that that is *not* what she is referring to.
My 2nd Great Grandfather married twice. When I view him on the
Hi List,
Apologies for not
reading the question properly.
Jill
Legacy User Group guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Try resetting relationships with:
Tools | Set Relationships | Set Relationships
Peter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Renee Zamora
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 3:52 PM
To: Legacy Mailing List
Subject: [LegacyUG] Relationships Calculator
I
Something is different. I have version 110, and I am seeing the half
labels.
Robert
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jenny M
Benson
Sent: 2006-08-29 05:40
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships
to.
Nancy
Original Message Follows
From: Renee Zamora [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
To: Legacy Mailing List LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Relationships Calculator
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 23:52:14 -0600
I just went back and read
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jenny M
Benson
Sent: 2006-08-29 05:40
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships Calculator
jmglover wrote
To show 1/2 siblings:-
In the family view, right click on a child's name, click 'view', and
make sure 'show 1/2 kids
e it might be one of those pesky ".usr" files that is
corrupt.
Jack
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Renee
ZamoraSent: 29 August 2006 06:52To: Legacy Mailing
ListSubject: [LegacyUG] Relationships
Calculator
I jus
: [LegacyUG] Relationships Calculator
Something is different. I have version 110, and I am seeing the half
labels.
Robert
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jenny M
Benson
Sent: 2006-08-29 05:40
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
Subject: Re
Well well well - if you look at the email Gedcom Import Issue - I
think we have a solution that does not require having or knowing how
to use access.
I created a sample file with Female Partner1 on the left and Female
Partner2 on the right (M and F) and Adopted Child. I then exported
them to a
On 7/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good Day Susan,
Unfortunately neither
individual fits into the gender categories allowed by Legacy 6.
Fortunately I haven't run across this problem, however I think that the notes
and the radio buttons on the individual screen (M F ?)
.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Cathy
Flamholtz
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 5:25 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships not Husband/Wife
Hi.
This is the first time I've responded
That's cool, Wendy. It's nice to know another people person!
Tom
- Original Message -
From: Wendy Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: PRIVATE REPLY - Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships not Husband/Wife
Well
Hi.
This is the first time I've responded to any posting. I'm a new Legacy
user and will undoubtedly have questions in the future. My first try
at sending my gedcom from my previous program (Reunion) to Legacy was
a failure. I'd kept my source notes in a manner that Legacy didn't
recognize. So
Well, that was pretty stupid of me, wasn't it?! List Posting 101 - check
the
address to which you're sending your mail!
Too funny, Wendy. Hey, come join me in the teapot...the water's fine and the
tempest is invigorating!
I appreciate the kind, supportive words from you and the others. I
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 5:25 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships not Husband/Wife
Hi.
This is the first time I've responded to any posting. I'm a new Legacy
user and will undoubtedly have questions in the future. My first try
at sending
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 6:32 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships not Husband/Wife
Genelogy is all about genes - i.e. the bloodline. Either an individual
is
in the bloodline or not. In this case if the mother of the child is indeed
in the bloodline then the partner relationship actually
PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 7:44 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships not
Husband/Wife
This debate about same-sex marriages seems to pop up again
and again, and I think people are missing the point. It really
doesn't make a differen
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cathy Flamholtz Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 5:25 PM To:
LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships not Husband/Wife Hi. This is the first time I've responded to any posting. I'm a new Legacy
user and will undoubtedly have questions
:13 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships not Husband/Wife
Tom Montgomery wrote:
Faulty logic. Both individuals have ancestors to which they have a blood
relationship. Having no children has no bearing on it..
Tom
When you used
, 2006 5:30 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Relationships not Husband/Wife
I have scoured every corner of Legacy and can't work out this problem. I
assume that it cannot be done, but wonder if anyone else has faced this
situation and found a solution.
In my tree, I
From: C.G. Ouimet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A recurring theme ...
While it may be legally possible and socially acceptable to have partners
of the same gender, it is biologically and genealogically impossible.
Legacy currently operates on biology/genealogy principles as all genealogy
programs
This is an article about a VERY distant cousin (if you believe in evolution).
From: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/02/28/goat_wedding/
Published Tuesday 28th February 2006 15:17 GMT
NSFW A Sudanese goat-fancier has been forced to walk down the aisle with his
four-legged victim after the
Message -
From: Tom Montgomery [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 12:32 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships not Husband/Wife
Genelogy is all about genes - i.e. the bloodline. Either an individual
is
in the bloodline
Tom Montgomery wrote:
But if the mother is not in the bloodline then actually none
should be included in the data base as there is no blood relationship to the
ancestors.
Using that logic, the had no children flag can be eliminated. If a
married couple had no children, only one of them can
that, but could you clarify the rules
a bit for me?
Thanks!
Judie
-Original Message-
From: Tom Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 9:33 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships not Husband/Wife
* Replies will be sent
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships not Husband/Wife
Tom Montgomery wrote:
But if the mother is not in the bloodline then actually none should be
included in the data base as there is no blood relationship to the
ancestors.
Using that logic, the had no children flag
are not in
that line.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 12:57 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships not Husband/Wife
Tom,
Wow! I didn't know that. I
Sometimes it's hard to phrase a question clearly...sorry. Let me try again.
Genelogy is all about genes - i.e. the bloodline. Either an individual is
in the bloodline or not. In this case if the mother of the child is indeed
in the bloodline then the partner relationship actually has no bearing
: Tom Montgomery [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships not Husband/Wife
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 14:42:38 -0700
Faulty logic. Both individuals have ancestors to which they have a blood
relationship
Grimshaw
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/Grimshaw/
___
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships not Husband/Wife
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:22:18 -0700
parent can
be designated as one likes but she would not be the mother.
TomM
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 4:22 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG
the discussion
I will be happy to do so off line.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ronald
ferguson
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 5:10 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships not Husband/Wife
I am afraid it's
Of Bob
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 12:21 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships not Husband/Wife
Tom Montgomery wrote:
But if the mother is not in the bloodline then actually none
should be included in the data base as there is no blood
relationship
Me, too, Tom. Actually, I learned a lot from the discussion but am sorry to
have stirred up controversy. Has anyone considered creating a FAQ for this
list so that newbies don't endlessly bring up old issues? My original
question was quite innocent, but now I feel like a troll. Even so, I am
no children has no bearing on it..
Tom
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 12:21 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships not Husband/Wife
Tom Montgomery
, July 21, 2006 5:10 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships not Husband/Wife
I am afraid it's your logic that seems faulty. If my uncle and his wife have
no children then there is no bloodliine connection between me, my
descendants and my ancestors and my
Well, that was pretty stupid of me, wasn't it?! List Posting 101 - check the
address to which you're sending your mail!
Oh well, no matter - now you all know my opinion on the subject, which I had no
intention of posting - not because I particularly wanted to keep it private but
because I
On 6/26/06, ronald ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assuming that you have set the relationship
calculator with yourself as the starting point then the relationship to you
will always take priority.
Yes, I understand that. But I was hoping for a way of seeing multiple
relationships. (One of
On 6/26/06, Jack Earnshaw wrote:
The relationship in law isn't a genetic link and so the brother in law
relationship won't show up.
Not strictly true - the non-genetic link shows up if there is nothing nearer.
I was hoping for a way to find all links, not just the nearest.
Regards
Mary Young
82 matches
Mail list logo
