occurances of coningum to
coniugum.
I hope this helps. Sorry for the confusion.
Christopher Barttels
Dayton, WA
- Original Message -
*From:* Ron Ferguson rnldfe...@tiscali.co.uk
*To:* LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
*Sent:* Friday, October 16, 2009 11:43 AM
*Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG
When I was entering census records... for those times when the census taker
did not record the dwelling number or the family number I had been putting
the words not given in the blank. I just read in Evidence
Explained that the proper way is to put [blank] in that spot.
So, I would
I have been entering a ton of German church records recently.
When I enter these records, I am usually entering text/comments into three
fields; name, birth and baptism.
This morning I noticed that one of the words I have been entering, coningum
is actually coniugum. This is in the name
Message -
From: Christopher Barttels
To: LegacyUserGroup
Sent: 16 October 2009 17:37
Subject: [LegacyUG] Search and Replace in Source Detail, Name, Text/Comments
I have been entering a ton of German church records recently.
When I enter these records, I am usually entering text/comments
, October 16, 2009 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Search and Replace in Source Detail, Name,
Text/Comments
I really do not understand what you mean. There are Given name, Surname,
Dates-Birth, Dates-Baptism, Location fields for each and notes, for all of
which one can use Search
Christopher Barttels wrote
I have been entering a ton of German church records recently.
When I enter these records, I am usually entering text/comments into
three fields; name, birth and baptism.
This morning I noticed that one of the words I have been entering,
coningum is actually
/
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Barttels
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: 16 October 2009 20:07
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Search and Replace in Source Detail, Name,
Text/Comments
In the Family View, I click on the icon for Show List of Assigned Sources,
which
, 2009 11:51 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Search the Internet for Current Person
Has anyone come up with a successful string to search Find-A-Grave -
where the current person in Legacy is put into the search boxes on
Find-A-Grave search? If so - may I please have the string so that I
can set up
WOW! Very cool! I have never used this feature before. What a great family tree
program. Thanks, Robert Judy.
Marilyn
--- On Sun, 8/30/09, GeoSci geosc...@gmail.com wrote:
From: GeoSci geosc...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Search the Internet for Current Person
To: LegacyUserGroup
Never having done this previously -- where do you enter the below string?
Kay
- Original Message -
From: Marilyn Clark paddypeppe...@yahoo.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 7:56 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Search the Internet for Current Person
Never mind - I figured it out. Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: Kay Fordham kayhawo...@earthlink.net
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Search the Internet for Current Person
Never having done this previously
@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Search the Internet for Current Person
Go to a person in your Legacy file, then click on the globe Internet on
the top menubar. Then click on Search Internet for Current Person...
It opens a pop-up window where you can replace one
This is working for me:
http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gsrGSfn=[FirstName]GSmn=GSln=[Surname]GSby=GSbyrel=inGSdy=GSdyrel=inGScntry=0GSst=0GSob=n
(The above is all ONE line)
In the second field, put this in:
[ ]=[%20]
Hope it works for you.
Robert
At 2009-08-30 10:51 PM, you
Less than 30 minutes - and a SOLUTION!! Excellent! Thanks Robert -
worked perfectly!!
Keith
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Robert Carneal
USAcarnea...@adelphia.net wrote:
This is working for me:
: [LegacyUG] Search Problem
Pat,
You have to reverse engineer this. A sample was also shown in one of the
Legacy news articles. Heres the gist of it:
1. Do a search for all individuals with a census event and then tag them
with a number; let's say 9.
2. Next, search for ALL Individuals
Is there a way that I can search for those persons who need Census events?
For example:
1) All persons who might appear in the 1930 Federal Census
Thanks,
Pat
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
-Original Message-
From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
Of Pat
Sent: Sunday, August 09, 2009 4:32 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup List
Subject: [LegacyUG] Search Problem
Is there a way that I can search for those persons who need Census events?
For example
...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
Of Valerie Laskowski
Sent: Sunday, August 09, 2009 5:22 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Search Problem
Pat,
You have to reverse engineer this. A sample was also shown in one of the
Legacy news articles
of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_
From: bo...@vodafone.net.nz
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Search for unsourced data
Date: Thu
...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
Of ronald ferguson
Sent: Thursday, 16 July 2009 7:37 p.m.
To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Search for unsourced data
Boyd,
I assume that you mean Version 7.0.0.97 as .98 has not been released (if
there is one
/
_
From: bo...@vodafone.net.nz
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Search for unsourced data
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:07:48 +1200
Ron,
Sorry, yes it is version 7.0.0.97.
As you have found, the search works properly with any sources entered before
@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Search for unsourced data
Boyd,
Before I test this further, would you please clarify. Version 7 has been out
since around July of last year whilst version 7.0.0.97 has only been out for
a few days, which do you mean?
Ron Ferguson
/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_
From: bo...@vodafone.net.nz
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Search
Boyd Miller wrote
I am working on a family that was entered under version 7.0.0.90 but
had most of the sources added after conversion to version 98.
I have run SearchMissing sources, with all the boxes checked except
the Everything, Anything and ALL boxes. I get the response No records
were
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:03:03 +0100
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
From: ge...@cedarbank.me.uk
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Search for unsourced data
Boyd Miller wrote
I am working on a family that was entered under version 7.0.0.90 but
had
ticket no [317-11F15604-F881].
Boyd
-Original Message-
From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
Of ronald ferguson
Sent: Thursday, 16 July 2009 10:31 p.m.
To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Search for unsourced data
I had entered people and data about then, and had attached sources to
only some of the entered fields.
Thank you, that's what I thought you meant.
Was your experience this morning of finding an entry without a source
carried out with data entered and searched for using version 7.0.0.97,
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:02:39 +0100
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
From: ge...@cedarbank.me.uk
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Search for unsourced data
I had entered people and data about then, and had attached sources to
only some
I am working on a family that was entered under version 7.0.0.90 but had
most of the sources added after conversion to version 98.
I have run SearchMissing sources, with all the boxes checked except the
Everything, Anything and ALL boxes. I get the response No records were
found that match the
Does anyone know of a way to create a list of individuals that do not have
at least one picture linked to them? trying to create a list that can be
used to solicit from direct family members and dont see an option that deals
with pictures in the search arguments.
thanks
harold
, but will only needs
to be updated when photos are recieved.
Rich in LA CA
--- On Wed, 5/27/09, Harold Watson treeoflif...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Harold Watson treeoflif...@gmail.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Search list question
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Date: Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 7
: [LegacyUG] Search list question
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Date: Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 7:04 AM
Does anyone know of a way to
create a list of individuals that do not have at least one
picture linked to them? trying to create a list that can
be used to solicit from
Tag everyone in your direct line as TAG 1. Then do a search using ONLY
those persons that are tagged under #1.
michele
- Original Message -
From: Barbara Ford pastors...@gmail.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 12:46 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG
to hi-lite the
direct lines. I would also bring a descendants report of the 'oldest' ancestor
who lived there, as an index.
Rich in LA CA
--- On Mon, 3/16/09, Barbara Ford pastors...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Barbara Ford pastors...@gmail.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Search Results not highlighting
a descendants report of the
'oldest' ancestor who lived there, as an index.
Rich in LA CA
--- On Mon, 3/16/09, Barbara Ford pastors...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Barbara Ford pastors...@gmail.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Search Results not highlighting direct line
To: LegacyUserGroup
@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 12:46 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Search Results not highlighting direct line
Since my husband and I love to plan trips to visit ancestral burial
locations (morbid I know), it is convenient for me to have Legacy show
me the people in my tree who are buried
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:31:57 -0500, Barbara Ford pastors...@gmail.com
wrote:
Part of the reason for my question was to understand why the generated
search list of Individuals, Burial Place, Contains state name only
has SOME of my direct line bolded and not everyone (seems to be random
as to whom
It has been a while since I did that...I am running 6.0.
But, what doesn't make sense to me is that within the program itself,
these individuals ARE bolded as direct line. They are just not showing
up as bolded within the search results list (some are, some not).
Could that still be the problem
Now I'm really confused. I did the clear and re-set relationship
thing. It didn't change the search report list results (still shows
same ones as not bolded, when they ARE in my direct line). But I just
noticed that, at least in one case, when I hover the mouse over the
little colored square in an
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:13:09 -0500, Barbara Ford pastors...@gmail.com
wrote:
Now I'm really confused. I did the clear and re-set relationship
thing. It didn't change the search report list results (still shows
same ones as not bolded, when they ARE in my direct line). But I just
noticed that, at
Did you want a lecture???
People helped me, I help people, when you are ready, come join us.
Rich in LA CA
--- On Mon, 3/16/09, Barbara Ford pastors...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Barbara Ford pastors...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Search Results not highlighting direct line
. Is this how it should work? I would have thought
that one should be able to set tags whether or not they were visible.
Ron Ferguson
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 10:34:23 -0500
From: br...@legacyfamilytree.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG
@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] search index report problem
Ron,
I did test that and using advanced tagging, from the search list, will
apply the tags 4-9 for any of the buttons. If the tags are not showing
in the Name List, search list and on the Family View you cannot tag them
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] search index report problem
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:03:31 -0500
Hi,
I am trying to generate a report and it is not working
correctly. Below is listed the detailed steps of what I did. If
someone would please let
Of ronald ferguson
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 4:47 AM
To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] search index report problem
Ange,
I am having difficulty in picturing this as I cannot really see what you are
trying to do and why.
However, let us take the first bit
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] search index report problem
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:57:24 -0500
Hi,
I have a family branch whose name was constantly misspelled in the census
records. I am trying to generate a handy report to show everyone with that
last name and which census records I do have so I can
Angela,
Go to Options Customize General
In the Tagging options click on the tags to show button and change those
to include at least one of the custom tags you want in the report. On
the Report Row 1 screen ensure that that number is also selected. If
tags to show are the default 1, 2, and
-
From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
Of Brian/Support
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 10:34 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] search index report problem
Angela,
Go to Options Customize General
In the Tagging options
Can I put in a plea here for a small adjustment to the screen so that
ALL the taps can be shown at once - I gather the request has been
submitted by several other people.
It really would be a great help as otherwise, when using complicated
tagging, you have to repeatedly run searches to find out
I am sorry to report it was asked for in L5, and we were told that it was a
'footprint' problem.
Rich in LA CA
--- On Mon, 2/9/09, Elizabeth roobee...@googlemail.com wrote:
From: Elizabeth roobee...@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] search index report problem
To: LegacyUserGroup
...@legacyfamilytree.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] search index report problem
Angela,
Go to Options Customize General
In the Tagging options click on the tags to show button and change those
to include at least one of the custom tags you want in the report
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:51:38 +, ronald ferguson ronfe...@msn.com
wrote:
I have been trying to use Advanced Tagging on Tag 4 with only tags, 1, 2, and
3 showing (this was in connection with Richard's mitochodrial question) and
found that tags which are not showing cannot be set. Is this how
: kowal...@iglou.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] search index report problem
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:00:03 -0500
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:51:38 +, ronald ferguson
wrote:
I have been trying to use Advanced Tagging on Tag 4 with only tags, 1, 2, and
3
Hi,
I am trying to generate a report and it is not working correctly. Below is
listed the detailed steps of what I did. If someone would please let me
know what step I might be missing or if they too have the same error.
First go into search and set the following
of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_
From: cranberryf...@charter.net
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] search and replace
Date: Tue
792 replacements! Jeepers I have a lot of census records!
michele
- Original Message -
From: ronald ferguson ronfe...@msn.com
To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 9:43 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] search and replace
Michele,
I take it that you
Anywhere in field! That was my error! It is working fine now.
michele
- Original Message -
From: ronald ferguson ronfe...@msn.com
To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 9:43 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] search and replace
Michele,
I take
Dave Johnson wrote
Does anyone know how to tag everyone in the Legacy 7 database who does
not have a birth date? I?ve tried the search but alas . . . .
Search
Look for whom? Individual
Where to look? Birth Date
How to look? ???
What
Does anyone know how to tag everyone in the Legacy 7 database who does not
have a birth date? I've tried the search but alas . . . .
Search
Look for whom? Individual
Where to look? Birth Date
How to look? ???
What to look for?
of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson
- Original Message -
From: Dave Johnson
To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 3:29 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Search Problem
Does anyone know how to tag everyone in the Legacy 7 database who does not
have a birth date
. All of these work to
return a list of people with no birth date.
Mary
From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
Of Dave Johnson
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 7:29 PM
To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Search Problem
Does anyone
@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Search Problem
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:29:09 -0800
Does anyone know how to tag everyone in the Legacy 7
database who does not have a birth date? I’ve tried the search but alas
. . . .
Search
Look for whom? Individual
I believe that's under the new Search options. Try the 'Missing
Information' tab.
-
JL
JLog - simple computer technology for genealogists
http://www.jgen.ws/jlog
Dave Johnson wrote:
Does anyone know how to tag everyone in the Legacy 7 database who does
not have a birth date? I’ve tried
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Search Problem
I believe that's under the new Search options. Try the 'Missing
Information' tab.
-
JL
JLog - simple computer technology for genealogists
http://www.jgen.ws/jlog
Dave Johnson wrote:
Does anyone know how to tag everyone
I'd like to create a list of individuals that share the Military Service
event. Is there a way to do this?
Many thanks,
Richard
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
: harmony2...@verizon.net
Subject: [LegacyUG] Search based on shared specific event?
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
I'd like to create a list of individuals that share the Military Service
event. Is there a way to do this?
Many thanks,
Richard
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:43:59 -0700, JLB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you can't afford the $20/hour I have another method, which is
slower likely, depending how many people you need to make the
changes for, but will get it done.
Based on the OP's specs, I could probably write, test, and run the
ronald ferguson wrote
BTW, don't tell Jenny, but I don't include the name in a source when it
is the same as the individual :-0.
Oi! I heard that!
--
Jenny M Benson
** $10 OFF when you spend $50 or more in our store.
Use coupon code: Legacy2008 at checkout. Offer expires 10/31/08 **
.
Does that help to clarify why a search and replace here would be soo
nice???
Tamie
- Original Message -
From: JLB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] search and replace ?
Ahem ... I'm
for the death
certificate.
Does that help to clarify why a search and replace here would be
soo nice???
Tamie
- Original Message - From: JLB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] search and replace
is slower likely, depending how many people you need to make the changes for, but will get it done. JLÂ On Oct 22, 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] search and replace ? Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:27:31 -0400 On Wed, 22
'info' means what? Is it presently included as part of each Master
Source? If so, it's individualized and no, I don't think you can do it.
You could change the Master Source, i.e. Death Certificate part but
you'd lose the parts of the Master Sources that you want added to Source
Detail.
JLB wrote
You don't need to put the person's name into the Source Detail field.
The source is already attached to each relevant person.
I would take issue with that!
Quite apart from any other reason, it makes for consistency with other
Sources where you do need to quote the relevant name.
-0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] search and replace ?
'info' means what? Is it presently included as part of each Master
Source? If so, it's individualized and no, I don't think you can do it.
You could change the Master Source, i.e
Ahem ... I'm still waiting to find out what the OP meant by 'info'.
In the case of BMD's, depending where they come from, they may include a
text rendition, starting with the person's name and then a tidy column
listing everything else, in which case I copy and paste the entire thing
into
Anyone have the customized search string for Footnote.com (to be put
in the INTERNET: search the internet for this person) ??
Thanks
Keith
--
Surnames: McKain, Horn, Riale, Ulrich, Erisman, Leiphart, Reed and Henry
Website: http://home.comcast.net/~geosci64
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Try:
http://www.footnote.com/search.php?query=[GivenNames]+[Surname]
Caveat: In order for this to work for me, I have to log into
FootNote first. If I start Legacy first, use FootNote without first
logging in, then this merely takes me to Footnote's homepage. Once I
am logged in, it works
I know this has been discussed in the past, but was wondering if there are
any plans in the future to be able to sort search results by date? I did a
search for twins in our family file and the results, when printed, come out
alphabetically rather than chronologically. This may make sense to some,
I would like to be able to search from within Legacy at Google Books
(advanced search would be best). I love the ability to do this at Ancestry
and World Vital Records. Does anyone have the code needed to make this
work?? And/Or how about Footnote?
Thanks for any help,
Jean
Legacy User
- Original Message -
From: Jean Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 12:37 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Search from Legacy
I would like to be able to search from within Legacy at Google Books
(advanced search would be best). I love
I have a bit of a mystery, I did a search in Legacy 7 for people who died in
1985 ( I know of at least 3 in my tree including my father)
I put 1985 in the 'Died' box but I got No records were found that matched
this Criteria
I tried other years that I knew people had died in like my grand parents
Subject: [LegacyUG] Search Problems
I have a bit of a mystery, I did a search in Legacy 7 for people who died in
1985 ( I know of at least 3 in my tree including my father)
I put 1985 in the 'Died' box but I got No records were found that matched
this Criteria
I tried other years that I knew
Use contains 1985. It will pick up all the 1985s no matter the exact date.
michele
- Original Message -
From: Steve Giles
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 12:55 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Search Problems
I have a bit
Did you use Contains in the field How to search ?
Bert
- Original Message -
From: Steve Giles
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Saturday 13 September 2008 18:55
Subject: [LegacyUG] Search Problems
I have a bit of a mystery, I did a search in Legacy 7 for people who
- Original Message - From: Steve Giles
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 8:55 AM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Search Problems
I have a bit of a mystery, I did a search in Legacy 7 for people who died
in 1985 ( I know of at least 3 in my tree
Steve:
What is the criteria that you used and how did you do your search?
You will have to use two conditions as follows in the Query by Example Tab:
Primary Condition:
Individual, Death Date, After, 31 Dec 1982
Second Condition:
And
Individual, Death Date, Before, 31 Dec 1983
This
only dates)
The searches work very well but, you have to be careful on the parameters
Regards
Henry
- Original Message -
From: Steve Giles
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 11:55 AM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Search Problems
I
that was on.
---Original Message---
From: Leon Chapman
Date: 13/09/2008 18:49:57
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Search Problems
Steve:
What is the criteria that you used and how did you do your search?
You will have to use two conditions as follows in the Query
: [LegacyUG] Search Problems
I just don't understand it no matter what I try it just doesn't work.
I get no results even by putting the 'Before' or 'after' in.
I've changed the Exact, Starts with Anywhere in field buttons but still no
luck.
Steve
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Search Problems
I just don't understand it no matter what I try it just doesn't work.
I get no results even by putting the 'Before' or 'after' in.
I've changed the Exact, Starts with Anywhere in field buttons but still no
luck.
Steve
PS sorry about the HTML format it my
I have tagged (with a 4) everyone for whom I have Mountain Cemetery as
part of the burial location field. Now I want to do a search and
replace for the Tag 4s and put Mountain Cemetery in the 'Burial
Address' area of their Burial Notes. I have consulted Help but I can't
find where it tells
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:54:13 -0400, Pat Hickin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have tagged (with a 4) everyone for whom I have Mountain Cemetery as
part of the burial location field. Now I want to do a search and
replace for the Tag 4s and put Mountain Cemetery in the 'Burial
Address' area of
Mary Fowler Leek wrote
I'm not able to duplicate your problem. Are you certain
you're inserting the batch number in the source details?
Is anyone else able to get results like Jenny?
No, it's ok. I don't know what on earth I was doing before, but I have
since found that it *does* work.
No, it's ok. I don't know what on earth I was doing before, but I have
since found that it *does* work.
Jenny M Benson
Jenny,
Glad to hear all is well and just happy to see someone else can get
discombobulated, too! I'm forever getting
IMHO, they are not the same thing. 'can't read and
write' shows lack of education. 'unable to read or
write' may have to do with medical situations (blind,
brain damaged, idiotic). Both sentences are the
required answers to census questions in various
locations. It is, of course, your choice to do
I am trying to standardize everything. I am trying to replace
can't read and write
to
unable to read or write
(I have both version in my notes and I want only one version)
I am trying to use the search and replace and it isn't working.
I pull up the search and here is what I put...
Find
Nevermind. I figured out what I was doing wrong on the search and replace
and now it is working
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support:
Check the check boxes on the Search and Replace dialog box. Did you
check the correct items? Good luck.
Elsie
- Original Message -
From: Michele Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Legacy E-Mail List LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 8:56 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG
When doing a SEARCH - for an Individual - does it bother anyone else
that the list of choices in Where to Look is apparently RANDOM? Why
not alphabetically? You have to read through all of the choices to
find the one you want. Surname is before Birth Date, etc. I did not
even see PRIVATE as a
Group
Subject: [LegacyUG] Search
When doing a SEARCH - for an Individual - does it bother anyone else
that the list of choices in Where to Look is apparently RANDOM? Why
not alphabetically? You have to read through all of the choices to
find the one you want. Surname is before Birth Date, etc. I
1 - 100 of 231 matches
Mail list logo
