om>
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Incorrect Relationships
I agree completely that the direct relationship should be the one displaying.
I reported this a while ago as a bug, I'm sorry to hear that it's part of the
programming. If I didn'
That will be quite a trick if he can talk to them at the family reunion ;-)
Gary
- Original Message -
From: "ronald ferguson"
To:
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 4:41 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Incorrect Relationships
That's fine, Art, but how do you work it ou
H . . . it sounds like some folks have mighty tangled ancestries.
Wanna borrow mine? I have not yet discovered any dual relationships.
;) ;) ;)
Vivian White wrote:
Richard,
Except that the wife of your x-2 granduncle will be shown as the Wife
of x-2 granduncle which signifies no bl
Which I agreed is as it should be.
Gary
- Original Message -
From: "CE WOOD"
To:
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Incorrect Relationships
It is most certainly the practice in my family to call them simply Aunt and
Uncle. We are ta
ddon.com
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Incorrect Relationships
> Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:36:21 -0800
>
> Right, Gary.
>
> All my aunts and uncles, whether by blood or marriage, were always called
> aunt and uncle without reference to
Richard,
Except that the wife of your x-2 granduncle will be shown as the Wife
of x-2 granduncle which signifies no blood relationship. The correct
designation for her is your 27th Great grandmother because she is
related to you.
Vivian
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Richard Van Wasshnova
w
I also noticed such instances of xgreat-grandfather being identified
as x-2 great-granduncle but I realized that genetically an x-2
great-granduncle is closer than xgreat-grandfather so it is not wrong.
If one sibling is your 27th GGF and another is your 25th GGF the 27th
GGF is also your 25th GGUn
cyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Incorrect Relationships
> Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:36:21 -0800
>
> Right, Gary.
>
> All my aunts and uncles, whether by blood or marriage, were always called
> aunt and uncle without reference to how connected. But we knew that (for
--- Original Message -
From: _Vivian White_ (mailto:vwhit...@gmail.com)
To: _legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com_
(mailto:LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com)
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Incorrect Relationships
And then the problem is compounded when Legac
accepted into the family by marriage.
At family gatherings nobody checked with a lawyer or genealogist. We loved
them both.
Art Seddon
- Original Message -
From: Gary Templeman
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 7:10 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Incor
the default setting with an option for CLOSEST.
Carolyn
- Original Message -
From: Vivian White<mailto:vwhit...@gmail.com>
To:
LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com<mailto:LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com>
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 1:55 PM
Subject: R
And then the problem is compounded when Legacy finds the closest
relationship to one person in the marriage. Speaking of Direct
Ancestors which should always be grandparents, if it find the closest
relationship to one person in the relationship is an aunt/uncle or
cousin, then the spouse is Wife/hu
relationship should be
an available OPTION.
Carolyn
- Original Message -
From: Gene Young<mailto:n2...@cfl.rr.com>
To:
LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com<mailto:LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com>
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 4:40 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyU
Group@legacyfamilytree.com<mailto:LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com>
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 8:13 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Incorrect Relationships
Can we get someone from Legacy to weigh in on this. I have had the same
problems with incorrect and 1/2 relations since
Uncle.
Carolyn
- Original Message -
From: Gary Templeman<mailto:gtemplem...@comcast.net>
To:
LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com<mailto:LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com>
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 7:10 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Incorrect R
Can we get someone from Legacy to weigh in on this. I have had the same
problems with incorrect and 1/2 relations since switching to Legacy at V5
and continuing thru V7 and have reported them on the three releases I have
used. All I ever get is we will let the programmers know.
I have sent e-mails
Gene,
That is apparently *not* the case. I tried again and set the
relationships to 1. Legacy has to have a number. Now the people shown
in the example are my direct ancestors. They should be my
grandparents. The changes are indicated with **. It is even worse, as
some now don't appear as though t
- Original Message -
From: "Art Seddon"
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Incorrect Relationships
Gary Templeman correctly writes:
Hogwash. The Grand Uncle (or Aunt) is a brother (or sister) to one of his
grandgathers or grandmothers. W
Vivian White wrote:
If the program "knows" the she is my grandmother, why does it display
the aunt relationship on the family screen? I'm thinking it is finding
the closest relationship which is the 12th great grandaunt instead of
the logical 14th great grand mother.
Because you asked it to.
Here is a weird one I'm looking at right now
14th great grandfather Eivind Arnbjornson m. to 12th great aunt Koll
Great aunt Koll's father is shown as 13th great grandfather and I am a
direct descendant of 2 of his children.
Eivind's father is correctly shown as my 15th great grandfather and I
a
Gary Templeman correctly writes:
Hogwash. The Grand Uncle (or Aunt) is a brother (or sister) to one of his
grandgathers or grandmothers. Whether the Uncle or Aunt has any children or
not is irrelevent. My brother is still an Uncle, and related to, my children
even though he has none of his own.
G
I have just about everything, but Roots Magic does a nice job. (Sorry,
Legacy. I wish your program did too).
Viv
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 8:51 PM, CE WOOD wrote:
> What program do you use for creating the relationship reports?
>
> Carolyn
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFami
PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Incorrect Relationships
The relationship calculator is all messed up. I have 10th great
grandparents only married to each other, never married to anyone else,
that show with one side being the grandparent, the other wife of
grandfather. This happens in multipl
The relationship calculator is all messed up. I have 10th great
grandparents only married to each other, never married to anyone else,
that show with one side being the grandparent, the other wife of
grandfather. This happens in multiple places and instances. In some
places where there has been a s
Message -
From: "CE WOOD"
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 7:51 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Incorrect Relationships
The Grand Uncle (or Aunt) must have a child to be related to you. It is
their child. If the Grand Uncle and Aunt are the biological parents, they
should be
5, 2009 7:30 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Incorrect Relationships
What error? What child? What "correct designation"?
John S. Adams
Hermosa Beach, CA
--
From: "CE WOOD" mailto:wood...@msn.com>>
Sent:
What error? What child? What "correct designation"?
John S. Adams
Hermosa Beach, CA
--
From: "CE WOOD"
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 6:30 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Incorrect Relationships
Actually, the error oc
.
Carolyn
- Original Message -
From: Mary Hagen<mailto:hagen.m...@mchsi.com>
To:
LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com<mailto:LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 6:21 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Incorrect Relationships
I believe th
: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 8:11 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Incorrect Relationships
I think the one that I see the most and still boggles the mind,
you'll have your Grand Uncle and then his wife who should be
Grand Aunt labeled as "wif
yfamilytree.com
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 6:27 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Incorrect Relationships
Have you found any program that can do relationships? It is so crucial to
genealogy that I am stunned that Legacy doesn't get it fixed after ten years!
Carolyn
--
ilytree.com<mailto:LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Incorrect Relationships
I think the Relationship Calculator is, in theory, a great tool. I really
like the charts it produces showing the relationships of distant co
ll produce at least one.
I hope that Legacy can do a thorough redesign of the RC soon and it becomes
a reliable tool.
John S. Adams
Hermosa Beach, CA
--
From: "CE WOOD"
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 1:02 PM
To:
Subject: Re:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/>
_
> From: wood...@msn.com<mailto:wood...@msn.com>
> To:
LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com<mailto:LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com>
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Incorrec
gt;
>
>
> Brian is now working on it, but if anyone else is having problems with
> incorrect relationships, it would help them find the bug.
>
>
>
> Carolyn
>
>
> - Original Message -
>
> From: RICHARD
> SCHULTHIES
>
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyf
ssage -
From: RICHARD SCHULTHIES<mailto:fourpa...@verizon.net>
To:
LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com<mailto:LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 1:13 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Incorrect Relationships
I am guessing what is happeni
I am guessing what is happening. Is that 'aunt' actually both of those numbers.
For example, my son's relationship to Charlemange is over 48 different paths.
Which is correct, his 37th ggfather (x2), 38th ggfather (x31), 39th ggfather
(x15), or one of the various ways they are cousins.
I believe
36 matches
Mail list logo
