Ok, I have completed this now.
Ian Thomas
Albert Park, Victoria 3206 Australia
From: LegacyUserGroup [mailto:legacyusergroup-boun...@legacyusers.com] On
Behalf Of Cathy Pinner
Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2016 11:15 AM
To: Legacy User Group
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Tree pruning question
Ian,
I
Ian,
I don't quite follow.
But just follow the principle of working from the known to unknown.
Work up the branches and then unlink from parents when the link isn't
confirmed to your liking.
That unlinks everyone above that point from the main tree unless they
are linked through someone else.
This question arises because of a wrong choice of an individual at the top,
quite indefinite part of a tree - from which the problems cascade.
I hope I can describe it clearly.
Using a descendants view, there are just 3 individuals (+ one "unknown"
partner) in Levels 1 and 2, then of the Level 3
Doug,
Have you looked at the Families app from TelGen? See
http://www.telgen.co.uk/families/
Works on Apple or Android, phone or tablet.
Paul Gray
From: Doug Tracy [mailto:doug...@gmail.com]
Sent: September-02-13 6:09 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG
Hi Ken,
I have a large Legacy database of Pioneer names on my hometown area with
32,000+ families.
I would like to have this database on a hand held device so when travelling
around and someone asks me who married who or for some dates - I can show
them.
This might be a good topic for the cruise.
Hi,
We are excited to let everyone know that we just received "Tree Share"
Certification for FamilySearch Family Tree.
We will have a new Legacy update available soon. Before the end of the
month
http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/paf.asp
Thanks,
Ken McGinnis Millennia Corporation kenmcgin...@
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Sat, March 3, 2012 2:46:00 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Tree finder - maximum ?
I have 25 trees in my file at the moment.
Don't forget that the Tree Finder lists the individual in each tree with
the SMALLEST RIN. That might not be the person you're expe
I have 25 trees in my file at the moment.
Don't forget that the Tree Finder lists the individual in each tree with
the SMALLEST RIN. That might not be the person you're expecting to see,
so take a closer look. Who is your "candidate" linked to - is one of
them the person with the smallest RIN an
Having just learned about View > Tree Finder, I am of course taking a look at my
results. Many are a surprise, but I was expecting a few of them. Specifically,
there are two possible candidates for my husband's "jump across the pond" that I
expected to be there. (I've gone against convention and
For a moment, ignore Tree Finder. Each individual or group in Tree
Finder shows the individual with the lowest RIN for that group. The
"count" shows the number of individuals in each tree.
Go to the Name List. Clickon the # field to sort by RINs. Look at the
number at the top border in the titl
On 2011/10/25 06:39, ceaste...@aol.com wrote:
> Is this a bug? My tree's highest number today is 20760. I have set to
> reuse abandoned RINS. In another place I have 20694 individuals in my
> tree and have not deleted or merged anyone in at least two days while I
> have added at least 50 people
Hi listers,
Is this a bug? My tree's highest number today is 20760. I have set to
reuse abandoned RINS. In another place I have 20694 individuals in my
tree and have not deleted or merged anyone in at least two days while I
have added at least 50 people. There are 19291 listed in Tree Finder. I
Which is why I said in my post, to which you've replied with the
pertinent quote left attached, "tag the unwanted branches and delete them".
Actually, I did say I wasn't being particularly eloquent at the time,
and I should have said "tag the unwanted TREES".
Wendy
Joan Kemp said the following o
>killed about 20 mainframes, but who paid?
>Rich in LA CA
>
>--- On Mon, 8/22/11, Jerry wrote:
>
>> From: Jerry
>> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Tree
>> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
>> Date: Monday, August 22, 2011, 4:58 PM
>> Thanks Joan for the explanat
A while ago, someone suggested, copying a tree & deleting contacts you
don't need. Could I warn anyone who tries this that if you do this then
export as a gedcom to see what's actually there, you are left with lots
of floating fragments of tree - just because you break a link, eg delete
your mothe
e time. The one person's
killed about 20 mainframes, but who paid?
Rich in LA CA
--- On Mon, 8/22/11, Jerry wrote:
> From: Jerry
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Tree
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Date: Monday, August 22, 2011, 4:58 PM
> Thanks Joan for the explanation and
&g
Carl said:
> << Legacy's other big drawback is the difficulty of splitting off family
> groups -
> its somewhere between very cumbersome& impossible.>>
>
> I think that Legacy has great ease in splitting off family groups.
I have to agree with you, Carl. It's very easy to extract a particular
b
<< Legacy's other big drawback is the difficulty of splitting off family
groups -
its somewhere between very cumbersome & impossible.>>
I think that Legacy has great ease in splitting off family groups. I
note that the obvious ones have not been mentioned in the current
thread.
1) Advanced taggi
No problem, I understood that from your previous multiple posts on the same
subject.
Sherry/Support wrote:
>The concept is the same... no "screen shots" or graphics, whether sent
>as an attachment or inline - email programs can pull out inline
>graphics and deliver them as attachments...
>
>Gra
The concept is the same... no "screen shots" or graphics, whether sent
as an attachment or inline - email programs can pull out inline
graphics and deliver them as attachments...
Graphics can seriously cause problems for those of our listers who on
dial-up or on metered service.
Those of us with
Jerry,
Many thanks for this. There's no way you can get a virus simply by
copying & pasting a graphic into an email - you aren't running anything,
simply reading a text file (I worked in IT!). Downloading larger files
over a dial-up line is a better reason for not allowing inline graphics.
I'm n
Understood.
Jerry - MerriamFamilyTree.org
On 8/22/2011 8:20 PM, Dennis M. Kowallek wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 19:58:11 -0400, Jerry
> wrote:
>
>> I did not know
>> that you could get a virus by simply cutting and pasting either text or
>> a graphic, but maybe it's possible?
>
> You probably can
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 19:58:11 -0400, Jerry
wrote:
>I did not know
>that you could get a virus by simply cutting and pasting either text or
>a graphic, but maybe it's possible?
You probably can't, but as the recipient all I see is an HTML or
multipart email coming at me. I have no idea what is ins
Thanks Joan for the explanation and the graphic. True, they don't want
you to send any attachments to the list, but since you pasted the
graphic into the email itself and it was not an attachment, I would not
have known that was a violation of their rules either. I did not know
that you could get
Helpful? What?
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Sherry/Support
wrote:
> the few *very* helpful listers who have their email programs set to reject
> HTML emails
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-arc
No - they all got the message except for the few *very* helpful
listers who have their email programs set to reject HTML emails
because of the malware risk.
Sincerely,
Sherry
Technical Support
Legacy Family Tree
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Joan Kemp wrote:
> Sorry - just trying to be hel
On 2011/08/22 23:23, Joan Kemp wrote:
> Sorry - just trying to be helpful! Joan
>
> PS Do you want me to resubmit without the graphics?
Bit late now. Most people have seen your graphics :-)
--
Regards,
Mike Fry
Johannesburg
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquet
Sorry - just trying to be helpful! Joan
PS Do you want me to resubmit without the graphics?
On 22/08/2011 22:18, Sherry/Support wrote:
> Please NO ATTACHMENTS or in-line graphics to the LUG List! We have
> listers from around the world who are on dial-up or limited access and
> this causes them
Sorry - just trying to be helpful! Joan
On 22/08/2011 22:18, Sherry/Support wrote:
> Please NO ATTACHMENTS or in-line graphics to the LUG List! We have
> listers from around the world who are on dial-up or limited access and
> this causes them a lot of problems.
>
> If you want to upload a file
Please NO ATTACHMENTS or in-line graphics to the LUG List! We have
listers from around the world who are on dial-up or limited access and
this causes them a lot of problems.
If you want to upload a file to your website and send a link to the
file, that would be fine and dandy, but no attachments,
ll, I am afraid, no. Tree Draw has been suggested as a possibility, but
it would take an awful lot of messing around to get what you want ( if at
all)
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
-Original Message-
From: Joan Kemp
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2011 9:31 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUs
eek after working on the database but without any
change to the focus group criteria.
Ron Taylor
--- On Mon, 8/22/11, RICHARD SCHULTHIES wrote:
From: RICHARD SCHULTHIES
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Tree
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Date: Monday, August 22, 2011, 2:28 AM
The best way is to
The best way is to create a focus group, then make that group a temporary
database. The focus group has tagging options. Rich in LA CA
--- On Sun, 8/21/11, Lucy McDonald Shore wrote:
From: Lucy McDonald Shore
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Tree
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Date: Sunday
Hi again. I'm sure there is someone on the list that can tell you
specifically how to tag the ones you want in an "automated" fashion by
using the FIND features or by viewing the trees. I'm thinking that you
might have to make more than one pass through the database to do want
you want, but it ju
That's a very logical way to do it -- except that my database has 43,000
people! It would take quite a while to tag each and every individual I want
:-) You would think that, in this day and age, there would be an easier way!
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Jerry wrote:
> There are many Legacy
There are many Legacy users on this list with more experience than I
have, but could you TAG the persons you want in your cousin's genealogy
file and then transfer only the TAGGED persons into a new file, so you
will only be working with and displaying those persons?
Jerry - MerriamFamilyTree.org
Ferguson
>> http://www.fergys.co.uk/
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Joan Kemp
>> Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2011 9:31 PM
>> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
>> Subject: [LegacyUG] Tree
>>
>> Is there any way in Legacy of contruc
I, too, am attempting something along the same line as Joan. I am trying to
create a gedcom that will include only my paternal line (other than my
mother and her parents). I've even tried unlinking my mother's grandparents
from her, together with unlinking my husband from his great grandparents, to
sibility, but
> it would take an awful lot of messing around to get what you want ( if at
> all)
>
> Ron Ferguson
> http://www.fergys.co.uk/
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Joan Kemp
> Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2011 9:31 PM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
>
-
From: Joan Kemp
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2011 9:31 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Tree
Is there any way in Legacy of contructing a chart which shows all
relatives from a given line rather than just ancestors. I can do this
trivially by exporting data to GenoPro
Legacy cannot do what I think your after. Tree Draw ! Works great for
all in one charts or any other type chart. I have had it a long time and
enjoy the output. There is a large learning curve.
Tim
On 8/21/2011 2:31 PM, Joan Kemp wrote:
> Is there any way in Legacy of contructing a chart which sh
PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Tree
Is there any way in Legacy of contructing a chart which shows all
relatives from a given line rather than just ancestors. I can do this
trivially by exporting data to GenoPro, but have never managed in Legacy.
Joan
Legacy User
Is there any way in Legacy of contructing a chart which shows all
relatives from a given line rather than just ancestors. I can do this
trivially by exporting data to GenoPro, but have never managed in Legacy.
Joan
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Arch
I have direct ancestors, Zacharia Rice (1731-1811) and Abigail Hartman
(1742-1789), who had 21 children, all well documented. Guestimating at only
two children each, every twenty years would produce 21,504 people today.
That's all from only ONE family. It's very easy to have a huge database.
Same thing could be said for many Irish Catholic families also, and
I'm not just talking about 100 yearrs ago. 2 people I was in school
with in the 1970s/1980s came from large families, one of 16 siblings,
the other of 14 siblings. In fact, the guy from the larger family was
an uncle of the guy f
and let us not forget Amish and Mennonite genealogies.
Some families had 16 or more living children.
Gene Hutson
norfolk, Nebraska
From: RICHARD SCHULTHIES
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 10:35 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] v7.4.0.38 - New General Rele
46 matches
Mail list logo
