Hi Alan. We have moved about 3 small and 2 large Oracle applications over
from z/OS.
Mary Anne
On Jan 31, 2008 8:56 PM, Alan Ackerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My original topic was completely hijacked by disucssion of ZIIPS and
ZAAP so I am going to try again.
Please no more ZIIPs and ZAAPs.
On Friday, 02/01/2008 at 09:29 EST, Mark Pace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 1, 2008 9:15 AM, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Virtual network: No physical wires, switches; no (or reduced) need to
encrypt/decrypt data in transit within the box (CPU savings).
Good point, but the reason
RPN01 wrote:
We've moved IBI's I-Way and WebFocus from z/OS to Linux on zSeries, and
actually got an improvement in performance.
I was just beginning to wonder about performance. I think a brief
performance assessment from those who've done it would be beneficial.
Improved performance is
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of Mark Pace
On Feb 1, 2008 8:42 AM, Mehdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi List,
I'm a newbie not linux world but to zLinux world. As I know I should
be able to install zLinux on zseries standalone or under zvm but
don't
The s390 versions use 31 bit addressing, limiting the maximum memory for
the image to 2gig. The s390x versions use 64 bit addressing, increasing
the maximum memory to... A bit more than 2gig. :-)
Do you need 64 bit addressing? Most applications probably don't. Will you
get it? Probably. SuSE SLES
We've moved IBI's I-Way and WebFocus from z/OS to Linux on zSeries, and
actually got an improvement in performance. (We also moved I-Way and
WebFocus from a Solaris box to Linux on zSeries and got better than 60%
performance improvement. Not germane to your question, but possibly
interesting...)
Mehdi wrote:
Hi List,
I'm a newbie not linux world but to zLinux world. As I know I should be able
to install zLinux on zseries standalone or under zvm but don't know the
difference, which one is better, preferable and WHY? I know I'm limited in
number of LPARs if I install zLinux standalone
On Feb 1, 2008 2:52 PM, Mark Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gee, I really want to comment, can I, dare I ?
In der Beschränkung zeigt sich erst der Meister
-Rob ;-)
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access
On Feb 1, 2008 9:15 AM, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of Mark Pace
On Feb 1, 2008 8:42 AM, Mehdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi List,
I'm a newbie not linux world but to zLinux world. As I know I should
be
On Feb 1, 2008, at 7:44 AM, Mehdi wrote:
can anybody give me an idea about the s390 s390x versions?
Debian
doesn't have s390x version but CentOS has...
s390x is 64-bit, s390 is 31-bit.
Debian actually does have a 64-bit kernel for 64-bit machines, but its
userland is entirely 31-bit.
Adam
Hi List,
I'm a newbie not linux world but to zLinux world. As I know I should be able
to install zLinux on zseries standalone or under zvm but don't know the
difference, which one is better, preferable and WHY? I know I'm limited in
number of LPARs if I install zLinux standalone but what are
Alan, we moved our entire WebSphere (JAVA applications) environment from
z/OS to z/Linux. Saved a bunch on liscensing, we already possed the
distributed WAS liscenses. Nearly all of our our current java apps do
little more than replace 3270 screens,(no heavy cpu intensive work) most of
the data
s390 is 31-bit version of OS
s390x is 64-bit version of OS
Regards,
R.Nageswara Sastry, CSTE®,C|EH®,CSTM®
IBM India System Technology Lab
Phone - +91-80-41777527
Internet mail - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| From: |
|
can anybody give me an idea about the s390 s390x versions? Debian
doesn't have s390x version but CentOS has...
Thanks
--Mehdi
On 31/01/2008, John Summerfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob van der Heij wrote:
On Jan 30, 2008 12:28 AM, John Summerfield
What happens when one updates
Please refer to:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/linux390/whatsnew.html
... for the 2008-02-01 change summary:
October 2005 stream:
- Recommended kernel 2.6.16 patches:
Patch 20 with bug fixes
April 2004 stream:
- Recommended kernel 2.6.5 patches:
Patch 47 with bug fixes
On Feb 1, 2008 8:42 AM, Mehdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi List,
I'm a newbie not linux world but to zLinux world. As I know I should be
able
to install zLinux on zseries standalone or under zvm but don't know the
difference, which one is better, preferable and WHY? I know I'm limited in
Mehdi wrote:
--
/* Of one Essence is the human race,
Thusly has Creation put the Base;
One Limb impacted is sufficient,
For all Others to feel the Mace.
~Saadi (persian poet) -1258 */
Has anyone actually moved workload from z/OS to z/Linux?
Yes. Application development and testing, some DB/2 work, Oracle as
several people have mentioned, document conversion (PSF to ),
dataset compression and encryption, archive conversion, Websphere work.
How much more do you want? 8-)
While Linux can be installed in an LPAR directly, there are considerable
advantages to running your Linux images beneath z/VM as a hipervisor.
The first is a common interface to all the consoles. Each is just a virtual
3215 console terminal, with access gained by logging into the Linux guest
On Feb 1, 2008 4:57 PM, Alan Altmark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you don't have performance monitoring tools, life is going to be very
difficult since using VM and Linux commands to figure out what is going on
is a daunting task. Much of the good information VM has about user and
system
Hi list,
currently running RHEL4(64bit) under z/VM and NFS performance is dismal. Not
having much (hardly any) experience with linux I am beginning to wonder if I
need to ask for increased resources for the VM userid, but I don't know where
my bottleneck is located. Where should I start?
Start with the numbers... In addition to CPU, what is the I/O rate and other
performance indicators? How many clients are attempting to talk to the NFS?
What is your IP traffic load like? How many hops are the clients away from
the NFS server? What processes are causing the consumption of the CPU?
On Friday, 02/01/2008 at 10:41 EST, Warren Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
currently running RHEL4(64bit) under z/VM and NFS performance is dismal.
Not
having much (hardly any) experience with linux I am beginning to wonder
if I
need to ask for increased resources for the VM userid,
Hi, Warren.
Warren Taylor wrote:
Hi list,
currently running RHEL4(64bit) under z/VM and NFS performance is
dismal. Not having much (hardly any) experience with linux I am
beginning to wonder if I need to ask for increased resources for the
VM userid, but I don't know where my bottleneck is
I should probably mention that my OS is not even VM. Someone said here's your
vm userid and something something linux. Bring it up and use it as a support
tool. I got it all up and it works but the whole idea was to use it as a
database server, which also works but its *painfully* slow.
Marcy Cortes [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/31/08 12:11 PM
I'm pretty sure it's udev.
Correct.
Mark Post
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO
On Friday, 02/01/2008 at 11:43 EST, Warren Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I should probably mention that my OS is not even VM. Someone said
here's your
vm userid and something something linux. Bring it up and use it as a
support
tool. I got it all up and it works but the whole idea was to use
On Feb 1, 2008, at 12:02 PM, Marcy Cortes wrote:
Whew.
There is this mystery I just discovered with /dev/disk/by-path
Is there some reason why the 800a-800f disks don't result in
800ap1-800fp1? The p goes missing.
Is this a bug?
Looks like it. I'd say that's probably something to do
Whew.
There is this mystery I just discovered with /dev/disk/by-path
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/dev/disk/by-path ls -al
total 8
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Feb 1 09:00 .
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 1 09:00 ..
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 Feb 1 09:00 ccw-0.0.0100 - ../../dasda
lrwxrwxrwx 1
On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 8:42 AM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Mehdi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi List,
I'm a newbie not linux world but to zLinux world. As I know I should be able
to install zLinux on zseries standalone or under zvm but don't know the
difference, which one is better,
Adam Thornton wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008, at 2:51 PM, Kim Goldenberg wrote:
Group -
We are using both SLES 9x and SLES10. I have set up my ssh to use
keys
for authentication, and X forwarding is turned on for trusted
connections. (My desktop is Ubuntu Linux.) When I invoke an X-enabled
Mark Post wrote:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 1:18 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Kim Goldenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam Thornton wrote:
-snip-
Look in /etc/ssh/sshd_conf and see if X11 forwarding is enabled.
Adam
Yes, it is, but it doesn't work under sudo (sudo /sbin/yast2).
On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 1:18 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Kim Goldenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam Thornton wrote:
-snip-
Look in /etc/ssh/sshd_conf and see if X11 forwarding is enabled.
Adam
Yes, it is, but it doesn't work under sudo (sudo /sbin/yast2). This
does work on SLES9.
Currently running WAS on zOS and we are migrating to a zLinux system.
There are about 10 mod-9s (60-80 GB) worth of WAS data a lot of Docs and
PDF created from data mining apps that need to be migrated off of zOS,
WHILE MAINTAINING ACLs AS WELL AS PERMISSIONS. That's the big key,
getting the
Working through the addition of FCP disk to my Linux guests and
everything (now) appears to be going fine but I realized that I was
doing a dynamic attachment to the FCP ucb to the Linux guest on VM.
What should the directory entry for the device be ? Special or Dedicate
? Currently all I do is
On Friday 01 February 2008 13:53, Kim Goldenberg wrote:
Mark - I still get Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: with a sudo
gedit foo command that works when I use gedit foo.
If you pasted the entire error message here, then it looks like the DISPLAY
variable is not set in your environment. Is
DEDICATE vdev rdev
This e-mail, including any attachments, may be confidential, privileged or
otherwise legally protected. It is intended only for the addressee. If you
received this e-mail in error or from someone who was not authorized
Hi Jerry,
I am attempting a similar project. I'm trying to use an EMC DMX SCSI box
attached to my zLinux guests.
I attach (or DEDICATE) an FCP subchannel (an IODEVICE) to a zLinux guest
for each physical path I want. We are not going thru a fabric switch
but using point to point cabling. (I
Edmund R. MacKenty wrote:
On Friday 01 February 2008 13:53, Kim Goldenberg wrote:
Mark - I still get Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: with a sudo
gedit foo command that works when I use gedit foo.
If you pasted the entire error message here, then it looks like the DISPLAY
variable is
On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 2:43 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Spann,
Elizebeth (Betsie) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-snip-
I was able to get multipathing working, I believe, using DM-MPIO.
My challenge is getting LVM2 working in a multipath environment. The
/etc/multipath.conf and
On Feb 1, 2008, at 1:53 PM, Fargusson.Alan wrote:
There are two problems here.
First: doing a sudo echo $DISPLAY does not echo the DISPLAY that
sudo is using. The shell will replace the $DISPLAY before starting
the sudo command.
Second: DISPLAY=localhost can't work. I don't see how xclock
DEDICATE virt real
On 2/1/08, Jerry Whitteridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Working through the addition of FCP disk to my Linux guests and
everything (now) appears to be going fine but I realized that I was
doing a dynamic attachment to the FCP ucb to the Linux guest on VM.
What should the
There are two problems here.
First: doing a sudo echo $DISPLAY does not echo the DISPLAY that sudo is
using. The shell will replace the $DISPLAY before starting the sudo command.
Second: DISPLAY=localhost can't work. I don't see how xclock can be working.
-Original Message-
From:
Mark,
Where should I look for the doc, please?I've read the EMC doc and
looked thru the LVM HOWTO's. I'm not using fba emulation but native
SCSI.
Betsie
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark Post
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 11:56
On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 3:04 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Spann,
Elizebeth (Betsie) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
Where should I look for the doc, please?I've read the EMC doc and
looked thru the LVM HOWTO's. I'm not using fba emulation but native
SCSI.
I would start here:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 2:05 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul
J. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently running WAS on zOS and we are migrating to a zLinux system.
There are about 10 mod-9s (60-80 GB) worth of WAS data a lot of Docs and
PDF created from data mining apps that need
On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 1:02 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Marcy
Cortes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-snip-
Is there some reason why the 800a-800f disks don't result in
800ap1-800fp1? The p goes missing.
Is this a bug?
I agree with Adam. The fact that only the subchannel addresses with
Much of the doc out there is for earlier releases (I'm running SLES10)
and there is no real step by step information out there to add FCP to an
existing Linux Virtual Server.
The FCP Redbooks and NPIV Redbooks make some sign cant assumptions on
the level of knowledge that we have. So for
Actually, it has to be localhost; ssh is tunneling the connection, and
localhost:10 is the display it sets up to catch the information and tunnel
it back to the client end of ssh for actual display. There's nothing wrong
with it being localhost, so this isn't a symptom of the problem at hand.
--
Was yast supposed to create a zfcp.conf file in /etc ? I find references
to the file being needed across boots. Or do I just need to run the
mkinitrd and zipl ?
(Brad and Mark -- thanks for the pointers on multipath as that will be
my next headache after just getting FCP going)
Jerry Whitteridge
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 13:15 -0700, Mark Post wrote:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 3:04 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Spann,
Elizebeth (Betsie) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
Where should I look for the doc, please?I've read the EMC doc and
looked thru the LVM HOWTO's. I'm not using
We are using point to point cabling, so I can't use the discovery tools,
no switch.
I have connectivity after working out the LUN names. I'm struggling
with LVM2 over multipaths.
Thanks,
Betsie
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Raymond
Thanks -- Just pulled that one again. (More Night time reading !)
Jerry Whitteridge
Safeway Inc
925 951 4184
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Raymond Higgs
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 12:52 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Hi all,
We need to copy data from an HFS file system on a z/OS 1.8 system to a
SLES9 server image running under z/VM. The data contained on the z/OS
side is stored in USS and contains Access Control Lists (ACLs) which are
extended file attributes that can store more granular user access. Most
Betsie,
I was only addressing Jerry's san_disc/lsscsi/lszfcp documentation
complaints. I don't know how to help you with LVM. Sorry!
Ray Higgs
System z FCP Development
Bld. 706, B24
2455 South Road
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
(845) 435-8666, T/L 295-8666
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux on 390 Port
On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 4:24 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Spann,
Elizebeth (Betsie) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are using point to point cabling, so I can't use the discovery tools,
no switch.
I have connectivity after working out the LUN names. I'm struggling
with LVM2 over
The following Redbook has allot of information and step by step installs
of VM, sles10 and rhel5 to FCP disk.
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 17:13 -0500, Brad Hinson wrote:
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 14:47 -0700, Mark Post wrote:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 4:24 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Spann,
Elizebeth (Betsie) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are using point to point cabling, so I can't use the discovery
That's it! I've been trying to determine what to use with pvcreate.
And it's RHEL specific.
Betsie (my brain hurts - can I go home now?)
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Brad Hinson
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 2:22 PM
To:
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 14:47 -0700, Mark Post wrote:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 4:24 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Spann,
Elizebeth (Betsie) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are using point to point cabling, so I can't use the discovery tools,
no switch.
I have connectivity after working out
Using the ones shipped by Novell (sles9x - udev-021-36.69 ).
I guess I get to make use of my support contract! Let's see if I
remember how!
Marcy Cortes
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 1:53 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Kim Goldenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-snip-
Mark - I still get Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: with a sudo
gedit foo command that works when I use gedit foo.
This all works fine under SLES9x. Any thoughts?
From SLES9
North, Quinn wrote:
have been unsuccessful in compiling it on USS. Is this even possible?
3) Is there an easier w ay to do this than our two options?
from the tar manpage on RHEL-clone:
--xattrs
this option causes tar to store each file's extended
attributes in the
Paul J. Johnson wrote:
Currently running WAS on zOS and we are migrating to a zLinux system.
There are about 10 mod-9s (60-80 GB) worth of WAS data a lot of Docs and
PDF created from data mining apps that need to be migrated off of zOS,
WHILE MAINTAINING ACLs AS WELL AS PERMISSIONS. That's
Rob van der Heij wrote:
On Feb 1, 2008 2:52 PM, Mark Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gee, I really want to comment, can I, dare I ?
In der Beschr�nkung zeigt sich erst der Meister
My eyes got parity errors, they can't make any sense of that.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
North, Quinn wrote:
| Hi all,
|
| We need to copy data from an HFS file system on a z/OS 1.8 system to a
| SLES9 server image running under z/VM. The data contained on the z/OS
| side is stored in USS and contains Access Control Lists (ACLs) which
On Feb 1, 2008 11:36 PM, John Summerfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob van der Heij wrote:
On Feb 1, 2008 2:52 PM, Mark Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gee, I really want to comment, can I, dare I ?
In der Beschr�nkung zeigt sich erst der Meister
My eyes got parity errors, they can't
Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 02/01/2008 04:24:05
PM:
We are using point to point cabling, so I can't use the discovery tools,
no switch.
I have connectivity after working out the LUN names. I'm struggling
with LVM2 over multipaths.
Thanks,
Betsie
Some of san_disc's
The thinking here is that if the ACL on the file in USS contains a user id and
our SLES9 image goes out to LDAP for it's UID info, it should be the same. We
populated LDAP from RACF and we also have a particular naming/UID # convention
that is the same across the shop. User logon ID's and UID
69 matches
Mail list logo
