Re: ISP recommendation in Israel - geek-friendly & IPv6

I do not know, I only know to begin with my external ip was a private one (if I remember correctly it was 172.x.x.x) On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 2:50 PM wrote: > On Sunday, 16 April 2023 9:07:10 IDT Erez D wrote: > > You look for a Fixed ipv4 IP, Note that some ISPs do not give you even a > > real

Re: ISP recommendation in Israel - geek-friendly & IPv6

On Sunday, 16 April 2023 9:07:10 IDT Erez D wrote: > You look for a Fixed ipv4 IP, Note that some ISPs do not give you even a > real IP but you are already behind NAT and can't even use Dynamic DNS. > Carrier grade NAT or something else ? ___

Re: ISP recommendation in Israel - geek-friendly & IPv6

You look for a Fixed ipv4 IP, Note that some ISPs do not give you even a real IP but you are already behind NAT and can't even use Dynamic DNS. With HOT they gave me a non-real IP and I needed to persuade them to change it to a real one (I do not need a real one as I am using DynDNS) At the end

Re: ISP recommendation in Israel - geek-friendly & IPv6

I have Partner fiber. Note that fiber ISP is area dependent. You'll have to check availability in your area. ISP with fiber (That I know of. There are also virtual ISPs): Bezeq, Partner, Unlimited, Cellcom and Hot. Don't use Hot. Bad customer service. No idea about static IP. As per Ministry of

Re: ISP recommendation in Israel - geek-friendly & IPv6

Hi Lionel, I don't know about all the technical issues but I'm satisfied with Triple C. And I don't use Bezeq's fibers although it's possible. If you're interested in speed (ping/download/upload) to Europe, check in speedtest.net and you can write to me offlist to compare times. Thanks, Uri.

Re: More pieces of the IPv6 puzzle (Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael)

Thanks everyone. On 30 Jan 2016 12:43 a.m., "Yuval Adam" wrote: > > > On 01/29/2016 11:52 AM, Amos Shapira wrote: > > > > Does anyone here have experience with public IPv6 in the cloud > > (AWS/DigitalOcean/Google, in decreasing order of preference)? > > > > Yes, I run my

Re: More pieces of the IPv6 puzzle (Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael)

On 01/29/2016 11:52 AM, Amos Shapira wrote: > > Does anyone here have experience with public IPv6 in the cloud > (AWS/DigitalOcean/Google, in decreasing order of preference)? > Yes, I run my personal server on Digital Ocean + native IPv6 and it works great. Unfortunately, IPv6 support on AWS

Re: More pieces of the IPv6 puzzle (Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael)

Does anyone here have experience with public IPv6 in the cloud (AWS/DigitalOcean/Google, in decreasing order of preference)? On 29 Jan 2016 6:19 a.m., "E.S. Rosenberg" wrote: 2016-01-28 20:37 GMT+02:00 Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin < beni.cherniav...@gmail.com>: > Due to

Re: More pieces of the IPv6 puzzle (Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael)

On Fri, 29 Jan 2016, Amos Shapira wrote: Does anyone here have experience with public IPv6 in the cloud (AWS/DigitalOcean/Google, in decreasing order of preference)? Regarding AWS, the word seems to be that the only way you can make an EC2 instance available via IPv6 is to put a loadbalancer

Re: More pieces of the IPv6 puzzle (Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael)

It is of course highly recommended to figure out a way to use the firewall in the router in IPv6 mode too Changing your setup to local fws only makes you both more vulnerable to attack and the total setup much harder to manage In a worst (or best depends on how you look at it) case

Re: More pieces of the IPv6 puzzle (Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael)

2016-01-28 20:37 GMT+02:00 Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin : > Due to bezeq's modem's wifi unreliability, I'm mostly connecting to my > own wifi router anyway. > I'd have switched to it completely and use a firewall there, except > it's old and doesn't support IPv6 at all, and

Re: More pieces of the IPv6 puzzle (Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael)

Due to bezeq's modem's wifi unreliability, I'm mostly connecting to my own wifi router anyway. I'd have switched to it completely and use a firewall there, except it's old and doesn't support IPv6 at all, and I haven't gotten around to buy a new one and/or install *WRT. I'm also a general

More pieces of the IPv6 puzzle (Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael)

On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 15:55 +0200, Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin wrote: > Brain dump & tips on starting with IPv6 [I imagine Shachar knows all > this but for others, including future me ;-]: A nice brain dump! To complement the brain dump, I'd like to see advice, from anyone who has experience with

Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael

2016-01-12 19:18 GMT+02:00 Shachar Shemesh : > > Down sides: > You are still going to be using NAT. Since the IPv6 support in Israel is > virtually non-existent, which means you will be using your IPv4 address quite > a lot. You only get one of those. Do you mean still

Re: IPv6 tunnels [was: Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael]

On 26/01/2016 17:04, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 03:57:01PM +0200, Evgeniy Ginzburg wrote: > >> Hi all. Do we have one or two?? Want to get rid of NAT (partially). > > Off-topic, but I saw the following error today in my mail log: > > dsn=5.7.1, status=bounced (host

IPv6 tunnels [was: Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael]

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 03:57:01PM +0200, Evgeniy Ginzburg wrote: > Hi all. > Do we have one or two?? > Want to get rid of NAT (partially). Off-topic, but I saw the following error today in my mail log: dsn=5.7.1, status=bounced (host aspmx.l.google.com[2a00:1450:4013:c01::1a] said: 550-5.7.1

Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael

Thank you for another valuable piece of information. BR, Evgeniy. On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 7:52 PM, E.S. Rosenberg wrote: > Triple C may also support IPv6, when they started I used them, my > experience with them was very positive. > Very knowledgeable support people

Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael

Triple C may also support IPv6, when they started I used them, my experience with them was very positive. Very knowledgeable support people etc. The only reason I'm not with them still is that the other people who use the link demanded Rimon for their filtering prowess. HTH, Eliyahu - אליהו

Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael

018 Xphone AFAIK they are the only ISP that supports native ipv6 on non-commercial uplinks On 01/12/2016 03:57 PM, Evgeniy Ginzburg wrote: > Hi all. > Do we have one or two?? > Want to get rid of NAT (partially). > > BR, Evgeniy. > > -- > So long, and thanks for all the fish. > > >

Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael

Thank you. Will try. On Jan 12, 2016 15:59, "Yuval Adam" wrote: > 018 Xphone > AFAIK they are the only ISP that supports native ipv6 on non-commercial > uplinks > > > On 01/12/2016 03:57 PM, Evgeniy Ginzburg wrote: > > Hi all. > > Do we have one or two?? > > Want to get rid of

Re: ISP with native ipv6 in isarael

On 12/01/16 18:05, Evgeniy Ginzburg wrote: > > Thank you. Will try. > I did try. On the plus side: They give you a real address. In fact, they give you 2^64 real addresses. Bear in mind, however, that they do not give you a fixed address. You will get a different address range every time you

Re: ISP recomendation found

I agree, the gamers package is not what I would expect from ISP in ideal world. But as my SSH connections are working much better when I use the Gamers package, I have no other choice but to follow along. I prefer paying 20-30 nis more then working with a poor connection. My work output

Re: ISP recomendation found

On Nov 8, 2009, at 1:09 PM, Michael Ben-Nes wrote: I agree, the gamers package is not what I would expect from ISP in ideal world. But as my SSH connections are working much better when I use the Gamers package, I have no other choice but to follow along. I prefer paying 20-30 nis more

Re: ISP recomendation found

Bezeqint 8mb 'Gamers package' -- Michael Ben-Nes - Internet Consultant and Director. http://www.epoch.co.il - weaving the Net. Cellular: 054-4848113 -- On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 2:42 PM, geoffrey

Re: ISP recomendation found

Hi, Not trying to flame anyone, but Mickey Israeli IS one of the owners of Comm.net.il (see: http://www.db.ripe.net/whois?form_type=simplefull_query_string=searchtext=comm.net.ildo_search=Search), so comm.net.il is very small and one of the owners (or the owner). I'm not saying it's a bad thing,

Re: ISP Suggestion

Not enough info.. Low latency connection to where? BBL maybe sucks in service, but they have the biggest pipe in IIX for example (10 Gb) (I'm not trying to recommend them, I'm not their customer).. Some do not block ports, but do use QoS to shove the priority of P2P (torrent, emule) way down...

Re: ISP Suggestion

fine. - low latency in general - reasonably good VOIP performance - at least 2.5MB asymmetric - no QoS traffic shaping - absolutely no port blocking On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Hetz Ben Hamo het...@gmail.com wrote: Not enough info.. Low latency connection to where?

Re: ISP Suggestion

I hardly believe you'll find **ANY** ISP here in Israel which doesn't do traffic shaping due to 2 simple reasons: 1. Bandwidth From/To Israel costs a fortune (thanks goes to Med-1), add it with .. 2. Israel is considered a big big big piracy heaven, which means whatever bandwidth ISP throws to

Re: ISP Suggestion

On Oct 26, 2009, at 12:28 PM, Justin wrote: I've been with Interal until now. But they are merging with Bezeq Ben Liumi. I hate BBL, and more than that their quality sucks. Does anyone have a recommendation for a Linux friendly ISP, that doesn't block ports and can provide reasonable,

Re: ISP Suggestion

On Oct 26, 2009, at 1:09 PM, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote: I hardly believe you'll find **ANY** ISP here in Israel which doesn't do traffic shaping due to 2 simple reasons: 1. Bandwidth From/To Israel costs a fortune (thanks goes to Med-1), add it with .. 2. Israel is considered a big big big

Re: ISP Suggestion

On Monday 26 October 2009 14:01:52 geoffrey mendelson wrote: Actually I want traffic shaping. I want my VoIP to work. I want my   email. I'd like YouTube to work too, but 012 has not quite caught on   to that. Could you please elaborate? I'm not aware of any issues with YouTube, and I would

Re: ISP Suggestion

On Oct 26, 2009, at 2:13 PM, Imri Zvik wrote: On Monday 26 October 2009 14:01:52 geoffrey mendelson wrote: Actually I want traffic shaping. I want my VoIP to work. I want my email. I'd like YouTube to work too, but 012 has not quite caught on to that. Could you please elaborate? I'm not

Re: ISP Suggestion

On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:45:25 +0200, geoffrey mendelson geoffreymendel...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 26, 2009, at 12:28 PM, Justin wrote: I've been with Interal until now. But they are merging with Bezeq Ben Liumi. I hate BBL, and more than that their quality sucks. Does anyone have a

Re: ISP Suggestion

On Oct 26, 2009, at 2:00 PM, Boaz Rymland wrote: True regarding connection (and security is better with router, AFAIK), but not so regarding port 25 outbound comm. Some ISPs block it, as mentioned earlier in this thread. But, I think that a simple phone call to the ISP's tech service

Re: ISP Suggestion

On Monday 26 October 2009 14:24:11 geoffrey mendelson wrote: Except for early morning, I can no longer watch YouTube videos. They   run for a few seconds, stop for a while and continue, then they stop   for a while and continue. If I switch to Netvision, they play smoothly. Wierd... Could

Re: ISP Suggestion

Imri Zvik wrote: On Monday 26 October 2009 14:24:11 geoffrey mendelson wrote: Except for early morning, I can no longer watch YouTube videos. They run for a few seconds, stop for a while and continue, then they stop for a while and continue. If I switch to Netvision, they play smoothly.

Re: ISP Suggestion

2009/10/26 Gilad Ben-Yossef gi...@codefidence.com: Just an educated  guess, but I believe Netvision might have an Akamai node hosted there while 012 may  not. Since Youtube uses Akamai as a CDN, the connection via Netvision only foes through the local loop, while in other ISPs it does the

Re: isp throttles p2p

On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 01:48:25AM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote: I have 1 machine in the US (hosted) and 1 machine here which is connected to Netvision. I did a simple test: The machine in the US and the machine here in Israel both downloaded Fedora Core 6 DVD image through bittorrent, from the

Re: isp throttles p2p

If you mean eMule, the problem is not with your ISP. Recently several influential servers in Europe were shut down by the authorities, so many users (temporary, I hope) stopped to use eMule. The solution to the situation is: a) To get new server list from one of eMule-related sites. Connect to

Re: isp throttles p2p

Hi Sara, To tell the truth, I do not know which ISP DOES NOT throttle p2p apps (emule, torrent etc) although they don't admit that. (I do realize that this thing eats their bandwidth, but I do expect them to admit it to clients at least). I have 1 machine in the US (hosted) and 1 machine here

Re: isp throttles p2p

emule included. I have kad enabled and opened the ports in the router as well. I almost gave up on emule and torrents. I mainly use dc++. The speed there started to be very slow. Less than 1kb/s sometimes. iptables can help in this case? On 10/2/07, Yigal Asnis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you

Re: isp throttles p2p

Thanks for the tip. iptables can help? using non conventional ports? What you suggest? On 10/2/07, Hetz Ben Hamo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Sara, To tell the truth, I do not know which ISP DOES NOT throttle p2p apps (emule, torrent etc) although they don't admit that. (I do realize that

Re: ISP

This bears some resemblance to copyrighted software that is free for the home user, yet costs money for the corporate one, even though the user can just-as-well download the home-user SW and run it for corporation uses. Too expensive to actually check, so in most cases you just don't bother,

Re: ISP

Hi, At 12:30 24/05/01 +, you wrote: On Wed, 23 May 2001, Eran Levy wrote: Hi, Actcom gives static IPs for not much money (less than Netvision or Internet-zahav). Actcom service ADSL and again less than the other ISPs (as I know). But, I recommend Netvision or Internet-zahav and I

Re: ISP

Flamethrower Unholstered Alex Shnitman wrote: Do the ISPs actually care (I mean, is it in their contract) whether you do the former or the latter? How come? Yes, they care, because on the average, the more machines you connect the more traffic you'll see. This is shtuyot bemitz. If

Re: ISP

On Wed, 23 May 2001, Miki Shapiro wrote: This is shtuyot bemitz. If you're gonna hog your internet link, you're gonna hog, NAT or no NAT. If you're not gonna hog, you're not gonna hog, NAT or no NAT. It depends solely on what you like to do with you inet link - read mail or run a background

Re: ISP

On Fri, 25 May 2001, Oded Arbel wrote: There was an ISP in Singapure or something that prevented its home users from doing NAT, but this really isn't the thing here in Israel - Like so many has said - the ISP has no way to check - nor do they care - if you use 1 computer at home, or 3

Re: ISP

On Wed, 23 May 2001, Eran Levy wrote: Hi, Actcom gives static IPs for not much money (less than Netvision or Internet-zahav). Actcom service ADSL and again less than the other ISPs (as I know). But, I recommend Netvision or Internet-zahav and I cant understand why you left them because I

Re: ISP

// Just responding to an off-topic..., sorry. Until last October I was a Netvision subscriber. When I learned they canceled their support for Linux users with the basic subscription _without_ notice and without compensation I canceled my subscription and moved to ActCom. From my experience,

Re: ISP

On Wed, May 23, 2001, Eran Levy wrote about Re: ISP: Hi, Actcom gives static IPs for not much money (less than Netvision or Internet-zahav). Actcom service ADSL and again less than the other ISPs (as I know). But, I recommend Netvision or Internet-zahav and I cant understand why you left

RE: ISP

Several people have already mentioned ISPs liking or not liking masquarading. What does that mean? They have no way of finding out (and should not be interested) on whether you're connecting one machine to the Internet, two machines in your home (using one machine as the gateway doing

Re: ISP

before I sent :) At 11:34 23/05/01 +0300, you wrote: On Wed, May 23, 2001, Eran Levy wrote about Re: ISP: Hi, Actcom gives static IPs for not much money (less than Netvision or Internet-zahav). Actcom service ADSL and again less than the other ISPs (as I know). But, I recommend Netvision

Re: ISP

Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please excuse me if you consider this an off topic post. I am asking here because I respect the opinion of the Linux community and I am an avid Linux user myself. I don't think this is off topic at all. Quite frankly, I'd find Linux a lot less useful if not

Re: ISP

Hi, Nadav! On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 11:34:56AM +0300, you wrote the following: Some people have one machine connected to ADSL and download Linux distributions or listen to online music all day, and other people connect 3 machines with very light email and occasional surfing load. Do the

Re: ISP

On Wed, May 23, 2001, Alex Shnitman wrote about Re: ISP: Some people have one machine connected to ADSL and download Linux distributions or listen to online music all day, and other people connect 3 machines with very light email and occasional surfing load. Do the ISPs actually care

Re: ISP

Hi, Nadav! On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 01:40:03PM +0300, you wrote the following: I'm not talking about extreme situation or someone connecting their entire neighborhood to his ADSL connection: I'm talking about two typical homes commecting to ADSL 1. A home with 2 computers, say for the

Re: ISP

Hi, Actcom gives static IPs for not much money (less than Netvision or Internet-zahav). Actcom service ADSL and again less than the other ISPs (as I know). But, I recommend Netvision or Internet-zahav and I cant understand why you left them because I think they are giving a good service and

Re: ISP Q/Not Linux Topic

about the line: consider using something bezek calls "kav timsoret". this is an E1 line that is much cheaper than sifranet, even of you do not use all of it. netvision would not let you connect with such a line because bezek will not let them, but with barak, you can. you can ask barak for

Re: ISP Q/Not Linux Topic

about the line: consider using something bezek calls "kav timsoret". this is an E1 line that is much cheaper than sifranet, even of you do not use all of it. netvision would not let you connect with such a line because bezek will not let them, but with barak, you can. you can ask barak for

Re: ISP Q/Not Linux Topic

;Alon Barzilai" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Ben-Nes Michael" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: "ILUG" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2000 11:12 AM Subject: Re: ISP Q/Not Linux Topic about the line: consider using something bezek calls "kav timsoret". this is an E1

Re: ISP Q/Not Linux Topic

ot; [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Ben-Nes Michael" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: "ILUG" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2000 11:12 AM Subject: Re: ISP Q/Not Linux Topic about the line: consider using something bezek calls "kav timsoret". this is an E1 line that is much

Re: ISP Q/Not Linux Topic

EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2000 5:02 PM Subject: Re: ISP Q/Not Linux Topic well, I can and I do. ( if we mean the same line,and it is fiber) barak orders those lines for their clients. Im not sure about other ISPs, but as far as I know, only barak,nezek binleumi and kavey za

Re: ISP Q/Not Linux Topic

] To: Ben-Nes Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: ILUG [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ISP Q/Not Linux Topic about the line: consider using something bezek calls "kav timsoret". this is an E1 line that is much cheaper than sifranet, even of you do not use all of it. netvision would n

Re: ISP Q/Not Linux Topic

You won't find speed with barak. sorry :) - Click here for Free Video!! http://www.gohip.com/free_video/ - Original Message - From: Ben-Nes Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ILUG [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 7:32 PM

RE: ISP Q/Not Linux Topic

What's the problem with Netvision? What's the bandwidth of the line you got? What kind of router do you use? Are you connected directly to Netvisions router in Haifa, or are you connected to a router in Tel Aviv? Netvision has the biggest bandwidth, both to the IIX and to the backbone, so I don't

Re: ISP Q/Not Linux Topic

Well, they used to be good, but they're lines works slo lately. Just stick with tha salamandra for a while ;) Blessed be, GW. - Original Message - From: Ben-Nes Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Game Wizard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2000 8:23 PM Subject: Re: ISP

Re: ISP Q/Not Linux Topic

Well I use a Sifranet (384k) cisco router to Tel-Aviv. Im connected to netvision from the 1.1997 and it was fast. but in the last half year the problems don't stop. 1. The satellite do lots of problems which decrease the bandwidth. 2. The ATM between Tel-Aviv and Haifa fall all the time. 3. I

Re: ISP Q/Not Linux Topic

Give me a break !!! I have 2 MB Sifranet to barak and in worst cases i can D/L only at 25 KBps. As far as i know they are the best. and trust me, we checked almost everyone in Israel. Mike - Original Message - From: "Ben-Nes Michael" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "ILUG" [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ISP Q/Not Linux Topic

On Tue, 16 May 2000 20:58:15 +0200, "Idan A." [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: By the way, Bezeq closed a 2.5GB (And I do mean GB) line in Haifa during I don't want to be a Nudnik, but you actually mean Gb, not GB. (2.5Gb is == 2.5Gbit/s == OC-48). their strike. It affected your speed in the last few

Re: ISP doesn't support Linux ?! (RE: Mounting floppy.)

On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 09:58:32PM +, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote: The man has decided to use SurFree (the free payment ISP) - and in order to connect - you must use THEIR dialer program and NOT something else. Their program will give you after connecting - a window with advertisement and you