> > - No kernel patches for 2.2.12 available (using 2.2.11 causes confusion)
>
> ftp://ftp.nodak.edu/pub/linux/ESD/kernel/raid0145-19990824-2.2.12.gz
Who built this patch? Is there any word on a patch being distributed by
Ingo and crew?
Thanks,
Dave
Hi out there!
This problem is with a raid'ed device, so I feel this is the right place
to ask... It goes like this:
I just wanted to add a third hd to my two-way raid array. I did the
following (I don't remember the exact wording of the messages, so I give
only glipses of them):
# init S
... ru
> For what it's worth, this particular box is NOT running any IDE
> drives. It has (4) 2.1gb SCSI drives on an aic78xx adapter.
>
> The machine itself is an old HP Netserver LXe Pro with (2)
> processors (only one running now, obviously) and 192MB of RAM.
>
> I can't switch to 2.2.13pre11-non-RA
On Sep 23, 12:22pm, Martin Lichtin wrote:
} Subject: Beginner's experiences
> from someone who just-learned-how-to-setup-mirror-disks. I stumbled
> across the following:
>
> - No kernel patches for 2.2.12 available (using 2.2.11 causes confusion)
ftp://ftp.nodak.edu/pub/linux/ESD/kernel/raid014
You know the boot process... first your boot manager boots up (lilo) which
calls your kernel, once your kernel has done its thing it looks for a file
called init init starts all your shell and all your initialisation files.
If your getting the message that it cant find init, it measn that the ini
hello all,
I just installed raid 1 on two hard disks (using raidtools package in
redbhat 6.0)
The first hard disk has a two Gb root partition which
is the linux "/"/
sda1/
sda3 Raid partition 1
sdb3Raid partition 2
Now, in this config, when the secind hard d
Tomas Fasth wrote:
>
> "Robert E. Lee" wrote:
>
> > The latest kernel patch and raid tool combination I found on
> > ftp.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/raid/alpha was for the 2.2.11 kernel.
> > Where might I find the 2.2.12 kernel patches?
>
> For some time now I have used the "pre" patches th
I am getting the feeling that something in the IDE code isn't SMP
safe as all the lockups on SMP I am hearing about involving raid
on IDE.
I have had zero flaws with SMP + raid .. but then I don't use any
IDE components in my systems at all.
HA Quoc Viet wrote:
> "Jason A. Diegmueller" wrote:
>
No, I havn't had lockups at all that I remember, regardless of how hard
I beat on the machine. The system is a Dell PowerEdge2300 using
AIC-7880 controlers for the drives, and using the AIC-7860(?) for the
dat drive and cd-rom.
I run the same patches on a Dell OptiPlex GX1 using an AIC-7880
cont
Enable what in the kernel? I did compile it with raid linear and raid0 support
also with boot raid support, i checked that.
At 19:38 23/09/99 +0200, you wrote:
>Kelina wrote:
>
> > To answer ur 2nd question. No i haven't made a separate partition since
> > according
> > to /usr/src/linux/Document
Kelina wrote:
> To answer ur 2nd question. No i haven't made a separate partition since
> according
> to /usr/src/linux/Documentation/md.txt Booting from raid linear and raid0
> is currently
> supported (might b reading it incorrectly)
Don't forget to enable this in the kernel. That is, you
Let me explain... i haven't actually ran raid yet, i want it to run raid0,
but it's
not working yet. And i'm trying to get it to work from my current setup. Which
is just 2 ide hd's of which 1 has data and the 2nd was recently added... Both
are formatted with diskdruid and have linux native parti
Tomas Fasth wrote:
> For some time now I have used the "pre" patches that Alan Cox provides. They
> have the new RAID code applied.
I gave a flat out false statement. The pre patches do NOT have new RAID code
applied. I beg your pardon for this blunder. You still has to apply the raid0145
patch
At 02:59 PM 9/23/1999 +0200, HA Quoc Viet wrote:
>Well, I jumped from 2.2.10+SMP to 2.2.12+SMP. I've never used RAID
>and never got a lock/oops ...
I went from 2.2.5 smp to 2.2.11 smp to 2.2.12 smp, all with raid.
I had a few probs with raid until I added the raid patch, but the machine
is roc
Ups, I guess it was me fault! You were right, I did not get the latest
raidtools! Now, its working!
Thanks for your help!
Greetings Kay
--
Kay A Salzwedel
Heinz Nixdorf Institute
University of Paderborn
Germany
--
At 09:52 AM 9/23/1999 -0400, Drenning Bruce wrote:
>not to quibble, but the latest version is 0.90-5 (on i386 anyway).
Ah.. I need to get it then...
Last time I grabbed them is was still -3... I need to check more often!
===
David Cooley N5X
not to quibble, but the latest version is 0.90-5 (on i386 anyway).
> -Original Message-
> From: David Cooley [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 1999 9:22 AM
> To: Kay Salzwedel; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Raidtools
>
> At 02:30 PM 9/23/1999 +0200, Kay S
Um raid0 should strip everything evenly across both hda1 and hdc1.
You should have roughly the same amount of data on each partition.
I dont see how hdc could be completely empty and hda have 2gb of data on it,
or maybe i misunderstannd your setup?
Are you using a seperate boot partition (/b
Kelina wrote:
> What i get when booting is the following:
>
> Warning: unable to open an initial console
> Kernel Panic: No init found. Try passing init= option to kernel.
This usually happens when something is mounted as root which is not installed
as root. In particular, if /dev and /etc is mi
At 02:30 PM 9/23/1999 +0200, Kay Salzwedel wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>thanks for the replays to my earlier problem. Now I got kernel 2.2.11
>and the patch raid0145-19990824-2.2.11. It went well until I tried to
>compile the latest raidtools (raidtools-0.41). During the configure it
>say's that I have n
In when i did make menuconfig it said in the kernel-help that there was
support,
for booting from a raid linear and raid0 device. Also the HOWTO says u
don't have
to fool around with init scripts anymore cuz in the new raidpatches it can
all b done
without em
Surge
At 15:14 23/09/99 +0200
"Jason A. Diegmueller" wrote:
>
> : > : A number of us are having similar problems currently with
> : > : 2.2.1? with many ide disks and SMP. It is probably worth
> : > : sending linux-kernel a summary of your difficulty, as the
> : > : topic is being discussed. What Alan would really like is
>
As far as I can see you are using the correct raidtab. I've once set up a
raid-o device. togheter with somebody else.. for as far as I can remember
you have to make a initrd with the raidmodules.. and configer lilo to use
that initrd
Sjoerd Tromp
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Kelina wrote:
> I'm trying
At 14:30 23/09/99 +0200, Kay Salzwedel wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>thanks for the replays to my earlier problem. Now I got kernel 2.2.11
>and the patch raid0145-19990824-2.2.11. It went well until I tried to
>compile the latest raidtools (raidtools-0.41). During the configure it
>say's that I have no Ra
Is anybody manage to install the RedHat 6.0 on this server ?
I've just bougth this server and want to install RH6.0 but he didn't
recognize the HP NetRaid controler.
Ok for the SCSI adapter but not the Raid.
Thanks in advance.
Sébastien
: > : A number of us are having similar problems currently with
: > : 2.2.1? with many ide disks and SMP. It is probably worth
: > : sending linux-kernel a summary of your difficulty, as the
: > : topic is being discussed. What Alan would really like is
: > : if you could run 2.2.13pre11 without
I'm trying to run a raid0 setup as boot device with ide 2 disks on my linux
2.2.12 kernel patched with the latest raidpatch and ide patch and
compiled with raid linear and raid 0 support.
What i get when booting is the following:
Warning: unable to open an initial console
Kernel Panic: No init
Hi folks,
thanks for the replays to my earlier problem. Now I got kernel 2.2.11
and the patch raid0145-19990824-2.2.11. It went well until I tried to
compile the latest raidtools (raidtools-0.41). During the configure it
say's that I have no Raid definitions in the kernel headers:
configure:789
"Jason A. Diegmueller" wrote:
>
> : A number of us are having similar problems currently with
> : 2.2.1? with many ide disks and SMP. It is probably worth
> : sending linux-kernel a summary of your difficulty, as the
> : topic is being discussed. What Alan would really like is
> : if you could
: A number of us are having similar problems currently with
: 2.2.1? with many ide disks and SMP. It is probably worth
: sending linux-kernel a summary of your difficulty, as the
: topic is being discussed. What Alan would really like is
: if you could run 2.2.13pre11 without the raid code, and
Mark...Just for the record...were you having lockups previously? I have had
2.2.12pre7 SMP and non-SMP lockup on me. However, I split out some of the
hardware on the box and now I've been up for 7 days without lockup.
What is was:
Dual PIII/450
/ - Mirrored IDE
/usr2 - RAID5 - 3x9G SCSI on AIC7
I just did the very same thing
Kernel: 2.2.12
Patch: raid0145-19990824-2.2.11
added Raid0 and Linear support, Raid5 as module
*BUT* i also used an ide patch ide.2.2.12.patch.gz which i can get from the
people's dir
under hedrick from any ftp.xx.kernel.org ftp.
I patched the kernel with raidpat
from someone who just-learned-how-to-setup-mirror-disks. I stumbled
across the following:
- No kernel patches for 2.2.12 available (using 2.2.11 causes confusion)
- raidtools-19990824-0.90 contains old 0.90.2 HOWTO
- raidtools: What are the raid?.conf.sample files for?
- /proc/mdstat: What do the
"Robert E. Lee" wrote:
> The latest kernel patch and raid tool combination I found on
> ftp.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/raid/alpha was for the 2.2.11 kernel.
> Where might I find the 2.2.12 kernel patches?
For some time now I have used the "pre" patches that Alan Cox provides. They
have the
Hi folks,
I encountered an error while compiling the kernel. Here is my
configuration:
* Kernel: 2.2.12
* Patch: raid0145-19990824-2.2.11
* added Raid0 and Linear support
This is what I got:
fs/fs.o: In function `cache_drop_behind':
fs/fs.o(.text+0x2f32): undefined reference to `buffer_lowprio'
Stephen Waters wrote:
> We have an aic7xxx (2940uw) currently and i am curious how well
> it would work in a hotswap situation. is there some sort of command you
> tell the aic7xxx driver to tell it that you're going to remove a disk?
> linux/drivers/scsi/README.aic7xxx didn't seem to say anything
36 matches
Mail list logo
