Mail-Sendmail-Authentication (Gerry Doris)
Distros-Reviews-Gentoo (Collins Richey)
Window Managers-
Afterstep (old)
XFCE-Fixing GTK Errors (old) (Hunley)
XFCE-GNOME/KDE1/KDE2 compile and install (Jordan)
XFCE- Adding using KDM / Xinitrc (Hunley)
XFCE- Adding using GDM (Myles)
XFCE-
I have looked high
and low for an example of the syntax to use this in my /etc/ppp/options
file. I have seen references to tcpdump, but that doesn't help because I
don't know how to use that either.
My problem is I have
fetchmail checking mail every 5 minutes. However, it keeps my
Typing furiously on March 21, Keith Morse managed to emit:
Been reading the docs and doing various searches on Google and
www.deja.com. Still haven't found if this is possible. Ideas?
How about just rewriting the MBR with something like:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/your/disk bs=446 count=1
Kurt
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 00:41:40 -0500
begin Marvin Dickens [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
The Bush administration proposed today to drop a requirement
at the heart of federal rules protecting the privacy of
medical records. It said doctors and hospitals should not
have to obtain consent from
On 21 Mar 2002 22:11:00 -0800
begin Iraj Medifar [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
On Wed, 2002-03-20 at 04:25, David A. Bandel wrote:
On 19 Mar 2002 22:16:09 -0800
begin Iraj Medifar [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
[snip]
Thanks. I did and here's what I got:
esd: Failed
Bill Campbell wrote:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 12:41:40AM -0500, Marvin Dickens wrote:
The Bush administration proposed today to drop a requirement
at the heart of federal rules protecting the privacy of
medical records. It said doctors and hospitals should not
have to obtain consent from
Yea, you're probably right. Why would they put sound options under Sound.
Thats too obvious. Sheesh.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Andrew
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 6:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Log
It's a shame; we could have been a Great Country.
Power corrupts. Absolutely.
___
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
David A. Bandel wrote:
snip
Not sure I'm up on this amendment to the Consitution. Which amendment
provides for right to privacy of medical records?
Ciao,
David A. Bandel
--
The fourth amendment. It states:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,
and
edj wrote:
snip
The US Constitution limits only the government, not private parties.
Thus, while the US government would need a warrant to recover my papers
and effects, my doctor could disseminate my records to whomever he
wished, absent statutory prohibition. The Bush administration
Title: RE: OT: Feds want to drop protection of privacy regarding medical data
I believe we are talking about the Privileged Communications in an attorney/client relationship or the Privileged Information in a doctor/patient relationship. That is why the doctor needs a release from you to
David A. Bandel wrote:
OK, I'm not a lawyer, but I've been around enough of them to know a couple
of things: 1. Your (or my) interpretation of something as general as
what's written in the fourth (or any other) amendment is not necessarily
what you'd like to interpret it as. 2. Just
from David A. Bandel:
It can be argued that your medical records aren't yours at all. That
those papers are the property of the physician, not you. If you write
Strikes me that this spotlights the crux of the matter. That crux is
not that it might be debateable whether or on what basis
David A. Bandel wrote:
OK, I'm not a lawyer, but I've been around enough of them to know a couple
of things: 1. Your (or my) interpretation of something as general as
what's written in the fourth (or any other) amendment is not necessarily
what you'd like to interpret it as. 2. Just
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 15:42:00 -0500
begin Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
Seems that late Friday, the court ruled against M$'s request for a
preliminary injunction against Lindows using the name Lindows. Details
at www.lindows.com/opposition. Bout time some Linux company showed a
little
David A. Bandel wrote:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 15:42:00 -0500
begin Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
Seems that late Friday, the court ruled against M$'s request for a
preliminary injunction against Lindows using the name Lindows. Details
at www.lindows.com/opposition. Bout time some
Typing furiously on March 22, Net Llama managed to emit:
Just wondering if anyone had tried out the kernel pre-empt patch, and if
so, what were the results? I've read some encouraging stuff, but what i
want are personal stories of whether there is a noticable performance
improvement on a
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 11:57:58 -0600
Stuart Biggerstaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't really know the details (and don't really want to defend W.--or the
health insurance industry), but I'm not sure I can see this as a big
threat. I think most of the people involved have seen seeking
I'm going to take a slightly different tack here...
Have you seen Gattaca (1997)? The film featured one mans struggle to
break the bonds of his genetic limitations which caused him to be deemed
unfit to go into space by the big, bad MegaCorporation, despite his
skill and intelligence. He used
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 13:14:49 -0800 (PST) Net Llama [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Just wondering if anyone had tried out the kernel pre-empt patch, and if
so, what were the results? I've read some encouraging stuff, but what i
want are personal stories of whether there is a noticable performance
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002 21:05:05 -0800 Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: I'm always trying new stuff, and Gentoo looks interesting. Any
opinions here?
Just to be sure that you are referring to the gentoo linux distribution?
The gentoo folks also have a file manager named gentoo.
If its the
found it from the ppp log.
it's a private ip returned from the dial-up host.
apologize for overlooking this one.
Andrew Mathews wrote:
No, sendmail was simply unable to resolve itself. Is there an entry in
/etc/hosts for the machine name at that ip? Is /etc/nsswitch.conf set to
the order of
identity is for version 1, right? did I mis-interpret the doc?
Or that the key generation has nothing to do with protocol version?
when I used identity, I also set my putty to use version 1 protocol.
David A. Bandel wrote:
OK, time to understand what you're doing. -t rsa creates an ssh2 rsa
pre, xmp and plaintext: they are either deprecated, or required
the use of character entity lt; and gt;.
After talking to a modern generation of web programmer, this is what I
learnt about using the best replacement for them. I would resubmit my
stuffs.
#All documents should have this in the
Althoug it really don't matter, Windows has had encrypted passwords since
Win95b, I beleieve, but by default they were plain text. Win98 defaults to
encrypted.
All be it, nothing to really stop anyone from getting the password if they
really wanted it that bad, but it is there.
On Friday
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Typing furiously on March 21, Keith Morse managed to emit:
Been reading the docs and doing various searches on Google and
www.deja.com. Still haven't found if this is possible. Ideas?
How about just rewriting the MBR with something like:
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002 08:21:48 +0800
begin M.W.Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
identity is for version 1, right? did I mis-interpret the doc?
Or that the key generation has nothing to do with protocol version?
when I used identity, I also set my putty to use version 1 protocol.
David
BROWSERS- Mozilla (Doug Hunley)
=
Lonni J. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step help: http://netllama.ipfox.com
.
adsl-setup
adsl-start
adsl-stop
that's all I used.
I generated two /etc/ppp/pppoe.conf and cp them to /etc/ppp/pppoe.demand
and /etc/ppp/pppoe.persist respectively. I called adsl-start with the
right one at different time.
FYI, the rp-pppoe in redhat 7.x didn't expect you to use adsl-setup. she
I've forwarded this message from Hafiz as I don't have the time to help him
out. Please COPY [EMAIL PROTECTED] on your replies. Thanks!
--- begin forwarded msg ---
I need your help on DNS. I have a dedicated servers currently hosted at New
York. We have around 82 blocks of IP's assign to us
Collins spewed electrons into the ether that assembled into:
opinions here?
gentoo rocks. got the guys at work installing it just this week.
can choose from ext2, ext3, and Reiserfs for your filesystems.
there's only one correct choice in that list. can you guess it? :)
N.B. Depending on
Net Llama spewed electrons into the ether that assembled into:
BROWSERS- Mozilla (Doug Hunley)
this is a how to compile from source, and install all those purdy plugins
piece. please review, test, send additions..
--
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
Admin:
On Fri 22 March 2002 02:07 pm, David A. Bandel wrote:
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 13:49:11 -0500
begin edj [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
The US Constitution limits only the government, not private parties.
Thus, while the US government would need a warrant to recover my
papers and effects,
On Fri 22 March 2002 02:33 pm, Andrew Mathews wrote:
edj wrote:
snip
The US Constitution limits only the government, not private parties.
Thus, while the US government would need a warrant to recover my
papers and effects, my doctor could disseminate my records to
whomever he wished,
Hi,
take a look at:
www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/dns.html
again.
there is a warning, the forwarders entry in named.conf 127.0.0.1 will not
work. you should change this IP to a name server at your uplink.
I have never set up DNS so i cant help you.
maybe take a look at
35 matches
Mail list logo
