On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 07:06:32 -0500 Bruce Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 13 November 2003 22:58 pm, Collins Richey wrote:
Gentoo for PowerPC G5 now available
Posted on 11 November 2003 by pvdabeel
We're proud to announce the availability of the Gentoo for PowerPC G5
32
On Friday 14 November 2003 07:03 am, Collins Richey wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 07:06:32 -0500 Bruce Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 13 November 2003 22:58 pm, Collins Richey wrote:
Gentoo for PowerPC G5 now available
Posted on 11 November 2003 by pvdabeel
We're proud
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 06:03:56 -0700
Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 07:06:32 -0500 Bruce Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thursday 13 November 2003 22:58 pm, Collins Richey wrote:
Gentoo for PowerPC G5 now available
Posted on 11 November 2003 by pvdabeel
Gentoo for PowerPC G5 now available
Posted on 11 November 2003 by pvdabeel
We're proud to announce the availability of the Gentoo for PowerPC G5 32-bit
LiveCD. ISOs are now available on our main OSU mirror.
--
Collins Richey - Denver Area
if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday
The new G5s from Apple I'd love to have one -even with OS X on it. I
understand they are awesome. My daughter's Powerbook G4 made me realize
how good Apple stuff is!
Collins Richey wrote:
Gentoo for PowerPC G5 now available
Posted on 11 November 2003 by pvdabeel
We're proud
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 05:36:53 -0500 David A. Bandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 23:01:08 -0400
Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just found this in the Gentoo Portage Tree and... well... I'm
busting at the seams to share what I found
The Linux Gazette
On Tuesday 21 October 2003 01:29 pm, Collins Richey wrote:
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 05:36:53 -0500 David A. Bandel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 23:01:08 -0400
Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just found this in the Gentoo Portage Tree and... well... I'm
busting
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 23:01:08 -0400
Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just found this in the Gentoo Portage Tree and... well... I'm
busting at the seams to share what I found
The Linux Gazette is there!
Yeah, yeah... I know... but I'm a lovable geek!
Just emerge linux
On Monday 20 October 2003 06:36 am, David A. Bandel wrote:
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 23:01:08 -0400
Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just found this in the Gentoo Portage Tree and... well... I'm
busting at the seams to share what I found
The Linux Gazette is there!
Yeah, yeah
That did it. Thanks! My son should buy you a beer. 8-)
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 23:00:54 -0400
Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 02 October 2003 10:37 pm, someone claiming to be Alan Jackson
wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 14:15:12 -0400
Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 10:48 PM
Subject: Networking / security problem in gentoo
Well, my son is upset because he can't print to my printer since I
went to gentoo. He gets a message :
lp: unable to print file: server-error-service-unavailable
When I try it from a different system, I get
: Networking / security problem in gentoo
Well, my son is upset because he can't print to my printer since I
went to gentoo. He gets a message :
lp: unable to print file: server-error-service-unavailable
When I try it from a different system, I get :
connection to 'earthman' failed - Connection
the CUPS daemon)? LPD? LPRNG?
- Original Message -
From: Alan Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 10:48 PM
Subject: Networking / security problem in gentoo
Well, my son is upset because he can't print to my printer since I
went
:*
Active UNIX domain sockets (servers and established)
- Original Message -
From: Alan Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 10:48 PM
Subject: Networking / security problem in gentoo
Well, my son is upset because he
On Thursday 02 October 2003 10:37 pm, someone claiming to be Alan Jackson
wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 14:15:12 -0400
Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it xinetd?
Does it use tcpwrappers of any sort?
(more specifically, are you being blocked by /etc/hosts.deny or
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 20:31:26 -0400
Brett I. Holcomb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You run make menuconfig which gives you a menu of stuff that you can
change. When you exit and save the file .config in /usr/src/linux is
created or modified. It uses that to figure out what to build.
Yes, but
Exactly my point. The orignal poster of this thread was wondering about
editing .config by hand. In one of my posts I told him it's not
recommended. This post was in response to how the process worked.
David A. Bandel wrote:
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 20:31:26 -0400
Brett I. Holcomb [EMAIL
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 06:53:07 -0500
David A. Bandel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 20:31:26 -0400
Brett I. Holcomb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You run make menuconfig which gives you a menu of stuff that you can
change. When you exit and save the file .config in
PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan Jackson wrote:
I installed Gentoo a week ago, and it has mostly been quite smooth.
printer.o file created. Any suggestions?
Did you run make modules first?
Yes.
I'm closer to the problem, though. For some reason, in my
/etc/kernels/default_config
the usb printer
Alan Jackson wrote:
I installed Gentoo a week ago, and it has mostly been quite smooth.
However some, but not all, of my modules missed getting compiled.
In particular, usb/printer doesn't seem to want to compile. I ran
make modules_install
and it didn't help. I get no errors, I just
Did you use makeconfig to define whatever it takes to make the module
compile?
Alan Jackson wrote:
I installed Gentoo a week ago, and it has mostly been quite smooth.
However some, but not all, of my modules missed getting compiled. In
particular, usb/printer doesn't seem to want
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:50:37 -0700
Condon Thomas A KPWA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan Jackson wrote:
I installed Gentoo a week ago, and it has mostly been quite smooth.
However some, but not all, of my modules missed getting compiled.
In particular, usb/printer doesn't seem to want
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 22:02:09 -0500
Alan Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed Gentoo a week ago, and it has mostly been quite smooth.
However some, but not all, of my modules missed getting compiled.
In particular, usb/printer doesn't seem to want to compile. I ran
make
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:40:39 -0500
Alan Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:50:37 -0700
Condon Thomas A KPWA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan Jackson wrote:
I installed Gentoo a week ago, and it has mostly been quite
smooth.
However some, but not all, of my
Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 19:04:41 -0400
Brett I. Holcomb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you use makeconfig to define whatever it takes to make the module
compile?
Alan Jackson wrote:
I installed Gentoo a week ago, and it has mostly been quite smooth.
However some
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 19:50:07 -0600
Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 22:02:09 -0500
Alan Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed Gentoo a week ago, and it has mostly been quite smooth.
However some, but not all, of my modules missed getting compiled
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 20:52:17 -0500
Alan Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 19:04:41 -0400
Brett I. Holcomb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you use makeconfig to define whatever it takes to make the
module compile?
Alan Jackson wrote:
I installed Gentoo a week ago
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 21:05:37 -0500
Alan Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 19:50:07 -0600
Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 22:02:09 -0500
Alan Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed Gentoo a week ago, and it has mostly been quite
.
Anyway, I use the rc-update command and have never had a problem.
On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 21:01:32 -0400
Brett I. Holcomb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The local.start and local.stop are the last and first respectively run by
the system when it starts up. I found the Gentoo startup order a little
I haven't had any problems either and I use rc-update so I guess I've
gotten used to the way Gentoo does it and can live with it. Still, part of
me would like it to be more standard. However, the rc-update works very
well so far.
Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
When you install a script from
On Mon, 08 Sep 2003 20:01:57 -0400, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
I haven't had any problems either and I use rc-update so I guess I've
gotten used to the way Gentoo does it and can live with it. Still, part of
me would like it to be more standard. However, the rc-update works very
well so far
On September 8, 2003 17:01, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
I haven't had any problems either and I use rc-update so I guess I've
gotten used to the way Gentoo does it and can live with it. Still, part of
me would like it to be more standard. However, the rc-update works very
well so far.
Roger
Am I correct in understanding that the scripts in /etc/runlevels/boot and
default -- run in alphabetical order? Where would someone put a command that
would have gone in rc.local (so needs to run late)?
TIA
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL
Sorry to start a new thread, but Collins mentioned yesterday using bin files
on Gentoo, how is this done with emerge?
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 12:10:09 -0700
Marianne Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry to start a new thread, but Collins mentioned yesterday using bin
files on Gentoo, how is this done with emerge?
A few ways:
1) Supported binary ebuilds (these have -bin in their name). Gentoo
puts
needs to run late)?
Nope, Gentoo uses a dependency system to find the execution order.
Check the Gentoo Linux rc-script Guide:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/rc-scripts.xml
You'll find all the info there.
There's no rc.local. Instead you have:
/etc/conf.d/local.start
/etc/conf.d/local.stop
. It really sucks too. Personally, I think this
porion of gentoo should be overhauled and re-written to work something along
the lines of good old fashioned system V startup scripts as implemented in
Open Linux...
Cheers
that would have gone in rc.local (so needs to run late)?
Nope, Gentoo uses a dependency system to find the execution order.
Check the Gentoo Linux rc-script Guide:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/rc-scripts.xml
You'll find all the info there.
There's no rc.local. Instead you have:
/etc/conf.d
The local.start and local.stop are the last and first respectively run by
the system when it starts up. I found the Gentoo startup order a little
disconcerting, too. I guess we'll get used to it G.
Jerry McBride wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2003 06:44 pm, Marianne Taylor wrote
scripts are executed
based on alphabetical order. It really sucks too. Personally, I think this
porion of gentoo should be overhauled and re-written to work something
along the lines of good old fashioned system V startup scripts as
implemented in Open Linux...
Cheers.
Agreed, at least those I
On Sat, 06 Sep 2003 13:44:50 +1000
James McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
Glad you like it! Check out alt.os.linux.gentoo if you haven't
already.
Alan Jackson wrote:
Well I got the Gentoo CD and did the install over Labor Day.
Amazinglysmooth
on a
933 it took forever - and that was KDE 2.x which is smaller.
James McDonald wrote:
Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
Glad you like it! Check out alt.os.linux.gentoo if you haven't already.
Alan Jackson wrote:
Well I got the Gentoo CD and did the install over Labor Day. Amazingly
Is the open
Well I got the Gentoo CD and did the install over Labor Day. Amazingly
smooth. The bootable CD detected all my hardware, found my ISP, just
perfect. Better and easier than my Caldera 3.1.1 install. Really.
But oh my God it was slow! I recompiled KDE and that took 20 hours
on a 1 Ghz AMD machine
Glad you like it! Check out alt.os.linux.gentoo if you haven't already.
Alan Jackson wrote:
Well I got the Gentoo CD and did the install over Labor Day. Amazingly
smooth. The bootable CD detected all my hardware, found my ISP, just
perfect. Better and easier than my Caldera 3.1.1 install
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003 19:57:52 -0500
Alan Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well I got the Gentoo CD and did the install over Labor Day. Amazingly
smooth. The bootable CD detected all my hardware, found my ISP, just
perfect. Better and easier than my Caldera 3.1.1 install. Really.
But oh my God
Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
Glad you like it! Check out alt.os.linux.gentoo if you haven't already.
Alan Jackson wrote:
Well I got the Gentoo CD and did the install over Labor Day. Amazingly
smooth. The bootable CD detected all my hardware, found my ISP, just
perfect. Better and easier than my
For those of you without a high-speed internet connection, as I
reported earlier the current gentoo LiveCD sets will get you up and
going, but if you really want realtively current sources, try the
following uri.
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 09:43:17 -0400
Phil Sexton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You could
;)
dep wrote:
quoth Ken Moffat:
| Somewhat surprising results in this quick compare, with gentoo not
| showing well:
|
|
| http://articles.linmagau.org/modules.php?op=modloadname=Sectionsfil
|e=indexreq=viewarticleartid=227page=1
| http://articles.linmagau.org/modules.php?op=modloadname
Somewhat surprising results in this quick compare, with gentoo not
showing well:
http://articles.linmagau.org/modules.php?op=modloadname=Sectionsfile=indexreq=viewarticleartid=227page=1
http://articles.linmagau.org/modules.php?op=modloadname=Sectionsfile=indexreq=viewarticleartid=227page=1
I'm
On Sat, 02 Aug 2003 14:51:48 -0700
Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somewhat surprising results in this quick compare, with gentoo not
showing well:
http://articles.linmagau.org/modules.php?op=modloadname=Sectionsfile=indexreq=viewarticleartid=227page=1
http://articles.linmagau.org
quoth Ken Moffat:
| Somewhat surprising results in this quick compare, with gentoo not
| showing well:
|
|
| http://articles.linmagau.org/modules.php?op=modloadname=Sectionsfil
|e=indexreq=viewarticleartid=227page=1
| http://articles.linmagau.org/modules.php?op=modloadname=Sectionsfi
|le=indexreq
need updating.
* Type emerge --help config to learn how to update config files.
I see no errors in /var/log/emerge.log
Every time I see this error, it is totally benign, and it goes away
after some later emerges. You could search on gentoo forums or the
gentoo-user list archive, if you want
about, don't worry and just go on.
Emerge gentoolkit to get the etc-update command to help with the config
files.
* IMPORTANT: 1 config files in /etc need updating.
* Type emerge --help config to learn how to update config files.
--
Powered by GENTOO LINUX
search on gentoo forums or the
gentoo-user list archive, if you want to know more.
You do need to run etc-update to enable the 1 config file or modify your
existing config file. Gentoo does not directly update config files in
/etc and some other directories, which is a pretty good idea, because
On 29 Jul 2003 19:24:51 -0500
Tom Jandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Be careful of the automated update of etc-update, I totally
horked one of my systems with it. Now I run a backup copy of /etc
*before* ( if) I run it.
Yep, as you have discovered, the automated update feature (in the
extended
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003, Federico Voges wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 22:16:48 -0700, Net Llama! wrote:
On 07/26/03 21:24, Myles Green wrote:
But... I have an ISO image here of 1.4rc4 with stage 1, 2 3 tarballs
contained within. If you start with a stage 1 tarball you must still
build the
On 07/26/03 22:56, Myles Green wrote:
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 23:16, Net Llama! wrote:
On 07/26/03 21:24, Myles Green wrote:
But... I have an ISO image here of 1.4rc4 with stage 1, 2 3 tarballs
contained within. If you start with a stage 1 tarball you must still
build the system (stage one is
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 20:12:47 -0700
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07/26/03 20:06, Collins Richey wrote:
On 26 Jul 2003 19:18:26 -0500
Tom Jandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 10:32, Net Llama! wrote:
I finally bit the bullet, and decided to give Gentoo
Gentoo has three stages - basically starting points. Stage 1 is real basic
- it gives you a base system, enough to create a system and then proceed
on. Yes, stage 1 is a bootstrap process. Stage 2 and 3 tarballs have more
stuff compiled in them so you loose optimizations but you have a more
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 22:16:48 -0700, Net Llama! wrote:
On 07/26/03 21:24, Myles Green wrote:
But... I have an ISO image here of 1.4rc4 with stage 1, 2 3 tarballs
contained within. If you start with a stage 1 tarball you must still
build the system (stage one is just the packages needed to
I finally bit the bullet, and decided to give Gentoo a whirl. I opted to
build everything from scratch. Stage1 went fine, however Stage2 completed
1 with one error, however I can't figure out what that error is. As a
result, I don't know if its safe to continue. I'm also puzzled how
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 10:32, Net Llama! wrote:
I finally bit the bullet, and decided to give Gentoo a whirl. I opted to
build everything from scratch. Stage1 went fine, however Stage2 completed
1 with one error, however I can't figure out what that error is. As a
result, I don't know
On 26 Jul 2003 19:18:26 -0500
Tom Jandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 10:32, Net Llama! wrote:
I finally bit the bullet, and decided to give Gentoo a whirl. I
opted to build everything from scratch. Stage1 went fine, however
Stage2 completed 1 with one error, however I
On 26 Jul 2003 19:18:26 -0500
Tom Jandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 10:32, Net Llama! wrote:
I finally bit the bullet, and decided to give Gentoo a whirl. I
opted to build everything from scratch. Stage1 went fine, however
Stage2 completed 1 with one error, however I
On 07/26/03 20:06, Collins Richey wrote:
On 26 Jul 2003 19:18:26 -0500
Tom Jandl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 10:32, Net Llama! wrote:
I finally bit the bullet, and decided to give Gentoo a whirl. I
opted to build everything from scratch. Stage1 went fine, however
Stage2
about everything else. Am i missing something obvious here?
In the previous versions of Gentoo the stage 2 and stage 3 were two
different levels
of pre compiled systems for those that would rather not go through the pain of
compiling a system from scratch. They discontinued the stage 2 and stage 3
others) from source, and stage 2 then
compiles just about everything else. Am i missing something obvious here?
In the previous versions of Gentoo the stage 2 and stage 3 were two
different levels
of pre compiled systems for those that would rather not go through the pain of
compiling a system
was discontinued. As of rc4
the tarballs are only for i386, and you have to build from stage 1 to
optimize for any other cpu. My mistake
--
Tom Jandl
Powered by GENTOO 1.4-RC4
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http
On 07/26/03 21:24, Myles Green wrote:
But... I have an ISO image here of 1.4rc4 with stage 1, 2 3 tarballs
contained within. If you start with a stage 1 tarball you must still
build the system (stage one is just the packages needed to bootstrap the
system) by going through stage 2 and stage three
and had to look at the ISO's to make sure there were still
stage[1,2,3] tarballs in there.
My $0.02: Gentoo is a super fun distro but from my experience, it's
*real* easy to shoot yourself in the foot by using the wrong USE flags
or with ~x86 (bleeding edge) rather than just x86. When it all comes
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 23:16, Net Llama! wrote:
On 07/26/03 21:24, Myles Green wrote:
But... I have an ISO image here of 1.4rc4 with stage 1, 2 3 tarballs
contained within. If you start with a stage 1 tarball you must still
build the system (stage one is just the packages needed to
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 15:46:09 -0600
Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gentoo will be joining the ranks of the boxed set of cd's distros on
August 5, 2003. For those of you who don't have DSL/Cable or a CD
burner, this will be your opportunity to avoid the slow downloads and,
if you
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 15:58:27 -0500
Alan Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 15:46:09 -0600
Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gentoo will be joining the ranks of the boxed set of cd's distros
on August 5, 2003.
I've been putting off downloading it - now this I
Gentoo will be joining the ranks of the boxed set of cd's distros on
August 5, 2003. For those of you who don't have DSL/Cable or a CD
burner, this will be your opportunity to avoid the slow downloads and,
if you choose, much of the delays due to compiles that are associated
with a gentoo install
Quoth Collins Richey:
It seems that most prominent open software gurus share one common trait:
a highly developed ego (just think of RMS). If you want a good
chuckle, go here to read about the latest squabble between Dan Robbins
and one of his developers who is leaving the fold.
Folks,
I have just stepped away from the world of rpm based distro's to have a
go at gentoo.
First impressions are the website information is excellent and the
installation guides are very accurate.
However I am having an issue with getting mod_php to work using the
instruction at http
Have you looked in the apache logs. Mine are at:
/usr/local/apache/logs.
Joel
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Have you looked in the apache logs. Mine are at:
/usr/local/apache/logs.
Joel
Yeah gentoo stashes them in /etc/apache/logs but I can't seem to get any
meaningful mod_php failed to load because errors
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003 22:08:54 +1000 (EST)
James McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you looked in the apache logs. Mine are at:
/usr/local/apache/logs.
Joel
Yeah gentoo stashes them in /etc/apache/logs but I can't seem to get
any meaningful mod_php failed to load because errors
Great! It's a fantastic distro. I don't miss RPM at all G.
You might also try alt.os.linux.gentoo newsgroup.
James McDonald wrote:
Folks,
I have just stepped away from the world of rpm based distro's to have a
go at gentoo.
First impressions are the website information is excellent
Gentoo... I love it. You see something you want, emerge (install) it and... it
works. No BS, no tracking obscure dependencies, etc...
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003 14:12:29 -0400 Brett I. Holcomb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great! It's a fantastic distro. I don't miss RPM at all G.
You might also try
using emerge with ./configure
--with-mysql=/usr --with-apxs and it installs fine.
Looks like there is a problem with the gentoo php patch.
Might have to join the gentto mailing list so I can ask about how it all
works.
James McDonald
Systems Engineer
Singleton NSW Australia
Jerry McBride wrote:
I'm trying to track down a linux app that will implement video surveillance
using motion detection via simple Logitech QuickCams and the v4l api.
So far not much has turned up. It seems that most everything available will
only capture pictures at a set interval instead of by
Not much help to me, since I don't have any MAC gear, but looks
fascinating.
Gentoo now offers a LiveCD that runs on MAC OSX and utilizes
Mac-on-Linux.
www.gentoo.org
--
Collins Richey - Denver Area
gentoo stable - ext3
___
Linux-users mailing list
On 6/8/03 13:46, Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not much help to me, since I don't have any MAC gear, but looks
fascinating.
Gentoo now offers a LiveCD that runs on MAC OSX and utilizes
Mac-on-Linux.
www.gentoo.org
They are also working on bringing Portage to the OSX platform
release.
Yellow Dog is still the best for PPC Linux in my opinion.
Gentoo won't drag Xfree off the portage server, unless you want it. As for
networking, did you happen to visit gentoo.org and follow the associated
install instructions? Works for me... There may even be a mac in my future...
running
the best for PPC Linux in my opinion.
Gentoo won't drag Xfree off the portage server, unless you want it. As for
networking, did you happen to visit gentoo.org and follow the associated
install instructions? Works for me... There may even be a mac in my future...
running Gentoo ofcourse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 08:57:23 +0200, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
On Tue, 01 Apr 2003 19:05:34 -0500
Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey list.
As a new gentoo bigot... How does one re-arrange the startup scripts? On
the laptop thta I'm
and pcmcia are, for example
Sorry, no such directory structure in Gentoo. I've got a /etc/init.d and
/etc/runlevels. The runlevels directory has boot, default, gui, nonetwork and
single... these directories contain links to the scripts in /etc/init.d. It
appears that the links are executed in alphabetical
On Wed, 02 Apr 2003 08:57:23 +0200 Roger Oberholtzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--snip--
They get run by /sbin/runscripts.sh.
Ahh... a clue.
Maybe
there is a clue to how ordering is done there. Surely is it not strictly
alphabetic. But I don't know.
I dunno... it looks like they are
Jerry McBride wrote:
On Wed, 02 Apr 2003 08:57:23 +0200 Roger Oberholtzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--snip--
They get run by /sbin/runscripts.sh.
Ahh... a clue.
Maybe
there is a clue to how ordering is done there. Surely is it not
strictly alphabetic. But I don't know.
I
for networking and pcmcia are, for example
Sorry, no such directory structure in Gentoo. I've got a /etc/init.d and
/etc/runlevels. The runlevels directory has boot, default, gui, nonetwork and
single... these directories contain links to the scripts in /etc/init.d. It
appears that the links
PROTECTED] (tom) wrote:
--snip--
The start-up scripts that reside in locations in the /etc/rc.d/r0X.d
SYS4 format, say like Caldera or Redhat, then the system numbers
are the ones you modify for networking and pcmcia are, for example
Sorry, no such directory structure in Gentoo. I've got
Caldera or Redhat, then the system numbers
are the ones you modify for networking and pcmcia are, for example
Sorry, no such directory structure in Gentoo. I've got a /etc/init.d
and/etc/runlevels. The runlevels directory has boot, default, gui,
nonetwork and single... these directories contain
On Tue, 01 Apr 2003 19:05:34 -0500
Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey list.
As a new gentoo bigot... How does one re-arrange the startup scripts?
On the laptop thta I'm testing gentoo on, during shutdown pcmcia goes
down and takes eth0 with it... before the net-eth0 script runs
Caldera or Redhat, then the system numbers
are the ones you modify for networking and pcmcia are, for example
Sorry, no such directory structure in Gentoo. I've got a /etc/init.d and
/etc/runlevels. The runlevels directory has boot, default, gui, nonetwork
and single... these directories contain
Hey list.
As a new gentoo bigot... How does one re-arrange the startup scripts? On the
laptop thta I'm testing gentoo on, during shutdown pcmcia goes down and
takes eth0 with it... before the net-eth0 script runs when the net-eth0
script runs, since eth0 is already down, it prints a nasty
Greets list, Jerry,
Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey list.
Hey,
As a new gentoo bigot... How does one re-arrange the startup scripts? On the
laptop thta I'm testing gentoo on, during shutdown pcmcia goes down and
takes eth0 with it... before the net-eth0 script runs when the net
On Tue, 01 Apr 2003 19:05:34 -0500
Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey list.
As a new gentoo bigot... How does one re-arrange the startup scripts? On
the laptop thta I'm testing gentoo on, during shutdown pcmcia goes down
and takes eth0 with it... before the net-eth0 script runs
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 23:57:32 -0500
Jerry McBride [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 20:12:10 -0700 Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--snip--
Life in Denver has now turned to the white side - 1+ foot on the ground and 1+
more expected overnight. My daughter is overjoyed
1 - 100 of 258 matches
Mail list logo
